Beyond the PROFET Juergen Schulze MET Norway. Who's MET Norway?
-
Upload
maud-powell -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
2
Transcript of Beyond the PROFET Juergen Schulze MET Norway. Who's MET Norway?
Beyond the PROFETJuergen SchulzeMET Norway
Who's MET Norway?
3
PROFET ?
4
PROFF Field Editor
5
6
Prior to PROFET
7
Text forecast
· 50000 Pages of Text forecasts a year
· 5-20 people 24/7
8
TV forecast
9
Edited Meteogram
· Offshore forecast· Subjective Point
forecasts
10
Auto Meteogram
11
ICAO Products
12
And then came yr.no
13
yr.no
· Launched in September 2007
· Free data policy· 5th biggest weather
website on the planet· Interpolation on demand· 9 mio places registered· Top=6.9 mio unique
users/week· Point forecasts obsolete
14
YR Heatmap
15
PROFET … the intentions
Bringing the forecaster into the production chain
16
More intentions
Creating products from a single source
17
Even more intentions
Forecast consistency by using a single source
18
How PROFET works
· Choosing the “correct” model
· Fixing systematic errors in the model fields
19
Usage – Intended
· Intention to point out dangerous errors
20
Usage – Intended … and real
· Intention to point out dangerous errors
· Used to adapt the model output to fit the forecasters opinion
21
Usage - frequency
PARAMETERPARAMETER SUMMERSUMMER WINTERWINTER
1h Precipitation 1.9 % 2.8 %
Wind 0.9 % 2.4 %
22
VERIFICATION
23
Equitable Threat Score (ETS)
YESYES NONO
YESYES a b
NONO c d
· Threat Score: TS= a / ( a + b + c )· Hits expected by chance: E = (a+b) ( a+c ) / n· ETS = ( a – E ) / ( a + b +c – E )
24
Verification: Precipitation24h precipitation / summer1h precipitation / summer
APPROVED DATASET / DEFAULT MODEL
25
Verification Systematic error
Precipitation +30h forecastBIAS [mm / 24h ]
SUMMER WINTER
ALL CASESDEFAULT MODEL 0.8 0.5
APPROVED DATASET 0.7 0.7
EDITED CASES
DEFAULT MODEL 4.2 0.8APPROVED DATASET 3.7 1.7
26
Verification: comments
· Edited forecasts are more pessimistic than the model· Forecasters are able to identify situations where the model
has considerable errors, but editing the fields is not the optimal way to distribute this knowledge
· Situation has changed since the beginning. The default model has been improved by postprocessing the dataset
27
And the production chain?
More and more statistical and parametrisation fixes
28
Temperature?
· High resolution height model (50m horizontal)
· Inhomogeneous· Deep valleys
29
Temperature?
· High resolution height model (50m horizontal)
· Inhomogeneous· Deep valleys· Editing forbidden
30
Precipitation
· Use of prob forecasts by median
· Editing is not WYSIWYG· Post processing is time cost
31
Wind
· Statistical corrections for mountains and coastlines
32
Chosing the model ?
Just two times a day, night shift has not the capacity
33
Single point of production?
· Auto text forecasts – only at high sea.· Norway is quite Inhomogeneous – auto text did not succeed
over land
34
Consistency then?
· Still TV forecast produced by table· ICAO Products made by hand· Text forecasts still 50K pages
35
Consistency - yr.no/kart vs yr.no
36
Consistency - yr.no/kart vs yr.no
37
Consistency - yr.no/kart vs yr.no
38
Why stopping right now?
· New Supercomputer – New Model· AROME 2.5 km High res model over Norway· Updates 6 or 8 times a day· High res postprocess chains – time intensive with editing
39
The final reason
· Moving PROFET to AROME would cost a recognizable amount of infrastructural change – due to the implementation of NetCDF as the new grid format
40
What next?
The Forecaster is off the production chain again
41
Meteorologen live
· Making direct comments on the situation· Model/run/grid independent· Issuing geolocalised warnings, alerts, etc directly into the
final product· Maximum latency of 10 minutes
42
Implementation
· Phase 0: Soon· Using Common Technology for communication
(Twitter/Blog)· Phase 1: September 2013
· Adapting existing infrastructure to a set of the new requirements
· Phase 2: Not yet set· Complete new infrastructure with a postGIS database
engine for the geolocalisation