Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

34
Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance NCHRP Project 20-68A Domestic Scan Program Scan 09-03

description

Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance. NCHRP Project 20-68A Domestic Scan Program Scan 09-03. Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance. Sponsored by AASHTO, NCHRP and TRB. Impetus for Scan. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Page 1: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

NCHRP Project 20-68ADomestic Scan Program

Scan 09-03

Page 2: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Sponsored by AASHTO, NCHRP and TRB

Page 3: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Impetus for Scan

NCHRP Report 500, Volume 6: “A Guide for Addressing Run-Off-Road Collisions”

AASHTO’s “Driving Down Lane-Departure Crashes”

Page 4: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Focus of Scan

• While many states have implemented countermeasures, their nature and effectiveness have not been widely disseminated

• To identify and share these successful strategies in preventing lane departure crashes, and

• To ultimately save lives

Page 5: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

NJ

Scan Team MembersWA

MN

CO

ND

MO

MS

OH

MARK NELSONND DOT

INA ZISMANCO DOTDANIEL HELMSMS DOTJOHN P. MILLERMO DOT

CASSANDRA ISACKSONMN DOT

RICHARD B. (DICK) ALBINFHWA-WA

DEAN A. FOCKE, SMEOH DOT-RETIREE

JAMES KOCHENOURARORA AND ASSOCIATESNJ DOT-RETIREE

Page 6: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

PA

Participating States

CA

WAMN

MI

GA

CO

IA

MO

MS

SC

Page 7: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Preliminary Findings - Successful Lane Departure Strategies

Lane Departure Countermeasures Accurate and Timely Crash Data and Data Analysis Performance Reviews Funding Issues and Resources Institutionalized Culture of Safety Partnerships

Use of both “Proactive” and “Reactive” Strategies are important

Page 8: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Lane Departure Countermeasures

• Rumble Strips and Stripes (Shoulder, Edgeline, Centerline)• Safety Edge and Pavement Drop-offs• Paved Shoulder Widening• Pavement Markings (Edge Lines and In-Lane Markings)• Additional Horizontal Curve Signing (Chevrons, Advisory

Speed Limits)• Dynamic Signing (Speed Feedback and LED Signing) • Cable Median Barriers

Page 9: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

Shoulder Rumble Strips:~2,700 Miles

Centerline Rumble Strips:~5,400 Miles

Michigan’s Non-Freeway Rumble Strip Program

Page 10: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

Iowa’s Safety Edge on concrete pavement

Georgia’s Safety Edge on asphalt pavement

Page 11: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

Retro-reflective PavementMarkings

Curve Delineation

Advanced Pavement Markings, Signage, and Delineations

Page 12: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

Colorado’s Dynamic Curve Warning Signs

Page 13: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

Dynamic Signing for Horizontal Curves

Page 14: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

• SC DOT installed almost 500 miles of low tension cable on Interstate facilities since 2001

• Back in 2006 SC DOT reported the system had 10,000 hits, or "saves," since the program began

South Carolina - Cable Median Barrier

Page 15: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Successful Countermeasures

• Georgia DOT reports that effort to bring their off-system rural roads results in large reductions on ROR crash numbers

• Striping (Edge and CL)• Upgraded Signing and • Adding Raised Pavement Markings

Systemic use of a combination of low cost measures “gets the job done”

Page 16: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Crash Data and Data Analysis

• Agencies adept at processing crash data are better able to allocated resources

• Issues with: Ownership Data Quality

Use of automated inputs Accuracy of the accident report Precise crash location

• Ease of data queries and timeliness of reports

Page 17: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Crash Data and Data Analysis

Example: Run-off-RoadCollisions - Striking Tree(s)

Washington’s data quality allows for better selection of safety projects

Page 18: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Crash Data and Data AnalysisColorado defines a Safety Level of Service

Page 19: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Crash Data and Data Analysis

Colorado uses a Pattern Recognition algorithm for ALL projects

Page 20: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

20

Crash Data and Data Analysis1 – Good

Shoulder, Good Clear Zone

2 – No Shoulder, Good Clear Zone 2 – Good Shoulder, No Clear Zone

3 – No Shoulder,

No Clear Zone

Minnesota’s Edge RiskAssessment

Page 21: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Crash Data and Data Analysis• Mendocino County’s

Traffic Safety Review Program• Excellent low cost program

for rural counties• Identify and treat collision

generators systemically• Address problems unique

to local or low volume roads• Stretch resources• Create a road safety

program

Page 22: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Innovative Funding

• Everything is always underfunded, but• Successful states seem to be able to find funding for

safety SAFETEA-LU Section 156 and 164 are available State Set-asides can generate funds Don’t overlook Fee Revenue/fines as a source

Page 23: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Funding Issues – Local Agencies

• Wright County’s Experience• Limited

Resources• Limited tax base• Limited political

clout

Page 24: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Performance Reviews

• Appropriate follow-up project tracking is important for future success• Post project tracking gives good indication of what has

been done• Also show progress of mitigation strategies• Informs of what work is remaining• Can be used to inform Management, or Public of progress

Page 25: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Performance Reviews

Pennsylvania’s Trend Line Graphs

Page 26: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Performance ReviewsPennsylvania’s Pinwheel Plots shows progress to a goal

Page 27: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Safety Culture

• Institutionalized “Culture of Safety” successfully drives some agencies Safety Advocate

Someone’s personal mission Formalizing Safety into Departmental Policies

SOP, Standard Plans, Design Manuals, etc. Department-wide Safety Focus

Top management driven

Page 28: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Safety Culture

Page 29: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Partnerships

• Successful agencies team with other interested and affected agencies to increase the synergy of the effectiveness of Safety Programs

• Makes better use of the 4E’s of Highway Safety Engineering Enforcement Education Emergency Response

Page 30: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Partnerships – Other Agencies

Page 31: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Partnerships - Enforcement• Driver Behavior• Seat Belt Enforcement Campaigns• Conduct DWI Saturations• GDL Enforcement Campaigns• Speed Enforcement Campaigns

Page 32: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Partnerships - Education

• Education Regarding Cable Barrier in Michigan• Public Service Announcements• Informational Flyers• Project-Specific Training• Presentations • Website

Page 33: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Implementation of Findings

• Participate in conferences of national transportation organizations AASHTO, ITE, NACE, TRB

• Provide Web Seminars utilizing agencies which are advanced in selected topic areas Safety Edge, Low-Cost Program, Accident Data Collection,

etc., as deemed necessary.• Final Scan Report due by Summer 2011

Page 34: Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Best Practices in Solutions for Lane Departure Avoidance

Thanks to these hosting agencies: Colorado State DOT Georgia State DOT Iowa State DOT Mendocino County, California, Dept. of Transportation Michigan State DOT Minnesota State DOT Pennsylvania State DOT South Carolina State DOT Washington State DOT Wright County, Minnesota, Highway Department