Advanced Emergency Braking System

/Lane Departure Warning

System

OICA POSITION1

Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008Agenda item 4(a)

Summary

2

Data: EU, F, J

Scope and justifications for a future UNECE regulation

Requirements for AEBS

Requirements for LDWS

Organization of the work

Fatalities and Serious Injuriesby Vehicle Category (EU19)

3

60,0%

16,2%

5,5%

15,6%

2,2%0,5%

HCV

Light vehicles

Cat L vehicles

Bikes

Pedestrians

Others

16,1%

47,3%

8,3%

5,4%

10,3%

12,7%

PLVL2RMVéloPiétonAutre

Light vehicles mainly collide with each other

Heavy commercial vehicles mainly

collide with light vehicles

Source: CARE, EU19 in 2006 (LAB)

Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one light vehicle

Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one heavy commercial vehicle

When 1 HCV involved, nearly ½ of all serious injuries and fatalities occur in light vehicles.

Accidents Caused by Large Trucksby Accident Type (Japan)

4Source: Macro Accident Data Japan 2005

When 1 HCV involved, more than ½ of all accidents are rear-end accidents

43,7%

19,0%

23,0%

14,3%

Others

Front-rear

Head on

Front-lateral5

Fatalities and Serious Injuriesby Accident Type (France)

10,6%

28,9%

47,0%13,5%

Others

Front-rear

Head on

Front-lateral

Source: BAAC, France in 2007 (LAB)

The part of front-rear accidents is nearly the

double for HCV compared to light vehicles

Conclusions about available data:The efficiency of one given AEBS/LDWS varies according to the vehicle category (slide 3)

The efficiency of a system potentially preventing front-rear accidents is nearly the double on a HCV compared to a light vehicle (slides 4 & 5)

Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one light vehicle

Fatalities and serious injuries for accidents with at least one heavy commercial vehicle

Current Situation forAdvanced Vehicle Systems

6

No safety need for rulemaking whenvoluntarily fitted

Advanced Vehicle Warning Systems already exist on a

few vehicles

Warning Systems

Safety is ensured by CEL Annex of UNECE

R13/13H and R79

Advanced Vehicle Active Systems already exist on a

few vehicles (acting on braking or steering)

Active (intervening) Systems

With regard to existing regulations, additional rulemaking has the only purpose to align the provisions if

the systems are fitted or required.

Installation of AEBS/LDWS

7

Scope proposed by EC:"Vehicles in Categories M2, M3, N2 and N3 shall be equipped with an AEBS/LDWS which shall meet the requirements of this Regulation."

Timeframe proposed by EC:

29 October 2013 for New Types29 October 2015 for New Registrations

In order not to waste time and resources, future UNECE Regulations on AEBS and LDWS should be “if fittedif fitted” requirements based on the scope proposed by OICA and the timeframe for

mandatory installation proposed by EC.

EU is the first region to require installation of AEBS and LDWS on some categories

Mileage data helps defining the relevant scope

8

0

500.000.000

1.000.000.000

1.500.000.000

2.000.000.000

2.500.000.000

3.000.000.000

3.500.000.000

4.000.000.000

4.500.000.000

5.000.000.000

35

01

bis

40

00

40

01

bis

50

00

50

01

bis

60

00

60

01

bis

70

00

70

01

bis

75

00

75

01

bis

80

00

80

01

bis

90

00

90

01

bis

10

00

0

10

00

1b

is1

20

00

12

00

1b

is1

40

00

14

00

1b

is1

60

00

16

00

1b

is1

80

00

18

00

1b

is2

00

00

20

00

1b

is2

20

00

22

00

1b

is2

40

00

24

00

1b

is2

60

00

Gross vehicle mass (kg)

Mileag

e x

Nu

mb

er

of

veh

icle

s (

km

)

N2, 3,5t to 12t N3, > 12t

Fahrleistungen (Annahme)> 12t 135.000 km7 - 12t 60.000 km< 7t 17.000 km

Average vehicle mileage:> 12 tonnes : 135.000 km/year7 – 12 tonnes: 60.000 km/year< 7 tonnes: 17.000 km/year

Source: VDA 2007

Gross Vehicle Mass (kg)

Mil

eage

x q

uant

ity

of v

ehic

les

(km

)

Implementation of new UNECE Regulation

9

The systems are the most efficient on the following categories:

M3 Class II and III, > 12 t 4 x 2 and 6 x 2

(exception for M3G)

and

N3 > 16 t 4 x 2 and 6 x 2

(exception for N3G)

A reasonable limitation of the scope is also necessary to respect the EU time frame

Should the installation be unavoidable,

OICA recommends to

limit the scope to these categories

Requirements for AEBS

10

This regulation to be separated from LDWS

Aim: Collision avoidance Aim: Collision mitigation/reduction

Some systems already available

Currently no specific regulation

No need to regulate categories where system

is not required

Avoid unnecessary packaging

AEBS to be introduced into a new UNECE

regulationKeep legal flexibility

for non EU CPs

Requirements for LDWS

11

This regulation to be separated from AEBS

Aim: lane keep and change assist

Aim: warning only

Some systems already available

Currently no specific regulation

No need to regulate categories where system

is not required

UNECE R79 covers active systems

LDWS to be introduced into a new UNECE

regulationKeep legal flexibility

for non EU CPs

• October 2013 for New Types• October 2015 for New Registration

Organization of work

12

• Time frame for development of the new regulation should be compatible with the introduction dates

• Content of the regulation should be compatible with the introduction dates

• One informal working group is sufficient

EU dates

Time frame

Content

Optimization of the resources