Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián...

7
Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics István Cselényi TeliaSonera

Transcript of Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián...

Page 1: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation

Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András KornBudapest University of Technology and Economics

István CselényiTeliaSonera

Page 2: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

July 15, 2003 IETF 57 - Wien

RFC Editorial remarks

• draft-ietf-bmwg-benchres-term v2:– sent to the RFC editors, bounced back with some

comments

• Main remarks– Consistency with NSIS?– Slightly confused about diffserv– Referring to the Boomerang protocol

(research paper from the same authors)– Too much opinion (prejudgments) in a terminology

Page 3: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

July 15, 2003 IETF 57 - Wien

Updates based on remarks

• DiffServ parts are completely removed– No support for signaling protocols utilizing

DiffServ architectures (e.g. RODA)

• Boomerang protocol– NSIS presents it in its analysis draft!– Anyway, no special features are mentioned

• No more prejudgments

Page 4: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

July 15, 2003 IETF 57 - Wien

NSIS consistency

• NSIS Framework – close to Last Call!– NSIS terminology does not replace this

draft, but we can be consistent with its philosophy

• We think that it is NSIS conform now!– It was, so no big changes

Page 5: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

July 15, 2003 IETF 57 - Wien

New version: 02 -> 03

• Most important changes– A more precise QoS Session definition

(Previously Resource Reservation Session)

– New terms: Reservation States/Resource Reservation Protocol

– Unnecessary terms are removed– Many clarifications– BUT no change in the philosophy

Page 6: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

July 15, 2003 IETF 57 - Wien

Definitions6.1 Traffic Flow Types

6.1.1 Data Flow

6.1.2 Distinguished Data Flow

6.1.3 Best-Effort Data Flow

6.2 Resource Reservation Protocol Basics

6.2.1 QoS Session

6.2.2 Resource Reservation Protocol

6.2.3 Resource Reservation Capable Router

6.2.4 Reservation State

6.2.5 Resource Reservation Protocol Orientation

6.3 Router Load Factors

6.3.1 Best-Effort Traffic Load Factor

6.3.2 Distinguished Traffic Load Factor

6.3.3 Session Load Factor

6.3.4 Signaling Intensity Load Factor

6.3.5 Signaling Burst Load Factor

6.4 Performance Metrics

6.4.1 Signaling Message Handling Time

6.4.2 Distinguished Traffic Delay

6.4.3 Best-effort Traffic Delay

6.4.4 Signaling Message Loss

6.4.5 Session Maintenance Capacity

6.5 Scalability Limit

Page 7: Benchmarking Terminology for Routers Supporting Resource Reservation Gábor Fehér, Krisztián Németh, András Korn Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

July 15, 2003 IETF 57 - Wien

Future

• Need comments!– Draft was sent to the NSIS WG also