8/13/2019 Behind Closed Doors - Post Questionnaire Graphs & Analysis

1/3

Behind Closed Doors Post Questionnaire Graphs- For our Post-questionnaire we didnt want to ask many questions that asked about things that we as a team didnt

really have much interest in. Instead we wanted to ask precise, straight to the point questions that gave us

information on the main parts of the film such as the films strongest and weakest points and if we had pulled off

creating a Drama film.

Question 1: What Genre was the fi lm?

This question was asked to test if the genre of our film was clear to the audience. If it was clear then we

would know that we had used the codes and conventions of a drama film correctly, if it was not clearthen we would know that we had failed at upholding the codes and conventions of a typical drama film.

The graph above clearly shows that people were able to deceiver the type of film our film falls under as100% answered Drama. This means that our film was clearly a drama and that for us we'd followed thecodes and conventions enough for people to understand our conveyed genre.

Question 2: H ow much would you say you enjoyed the fi lm?

As our film's narrative was of a

controversial nature that could've

caused some, if not all people to feel

uncomfortable when watching thefilm I thought it would be great to see

how people responded to the film

despite the storyline and find out howmuch they actually enjoyed the film.

As the chart shows people seemed to

enjoy our film despite the sensitivecontent and those who filled out the

questionnaire only chose the options

enjoyed or enjoyed a lot.

8/13/2019 Behind Closed Doors - Post Questionnaire Graphs & Analysis

2/3

Question 3: What would you say was the two weakest poin ts of the fi lm out of the options below?

Question 4: What were the two strongest aspects of the fi lm?

For question three, we aimed togather information about whichaspects people thought were the

weakest within the film, so we gave

them a choice of 2 out of 7 options.As the graph depicts the majority

thought that sound was the weakness

with acting and lighting not far

behind. We gathered that soundwouldve been our weakest area as

well as lighting but acting coming in

joint second was a surprise to us, as agroup.

Question 4, was a follow on from

question 3 and it was aimed to see

which aspects people thought were

the strongest within the filmpresenting them with the same 7

options from question 3. This time

editing came on top as the strongestaspect of our film. However acting

came in joint second again,

suggesting that peoples opinion onthe acting of our film varied meaning

it was probably neither the worst nor

the strongest. Also within this

question there isnt as much variation

in the answers which could suggestthat our strongest aspects were easier

to identify and that most peoplea reed what the were.

8/13/2019 Behind Closed Doors - Post Questionnaire Graphs & Analysis

3/3

Question 5: What could there have been more of?

As a team we wondered what more we could have included in our film that might have made it thatbetter. From our discussion we came up with two things that we thought there might not been enough

of it as a team. The two things were characters and dialogue however we were mainly concerned

about the dialogue than characters. Therefore included it in the questionnaire and the outcome was that50% agreed with us and said that there couldve been more dialogue. The other 50% were spl it equally

between characters and the option of adding nothing at all.

Question 6: Would you describe the f ilm as...

Our final question was an option based question that asked participants to complete the sentence. We

wanted to see what their overall view of the film was so that wed have a rough idea as to howsuccesful the film was in terms of preference and standards. All whom answered selected the

preference of good. This was a great response as we knew that our film wasnt an absolute flop but

was to a good standard it wasnt great but good was good enough for us. There was a second part of the

qeuestion that allowed individuals to expand on their choice however it was optional so most did notcomplete it but one stated that it was puled off well.