BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

48
ARiMI – Asia Risk Management Ins0tute By MARC RONEZ Chief Risk Strategist & Master Coach Asia Risk Management Institute NOTES BCM vs ERM The Business Case for Integra9ng Business Con9nuity & Enterprise Risk Management Business Continuity Management Award 2013, 24 January 2013

description

Marc explores and discusses the ‘business case’ for integrating Business Continuity Management (BCM) & Enterprise Risk Management (ERM).

Transcript of BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Page 1: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ARiMI  –  Asia  Risk  Management  Ins0tute  

By MARC RONEZ Chief Risk Strategist & Master Coach Asia Risk Management Institute

NOTES  

BCM  vs  ERMThe  Business  Case  for  Integra9ng  Business  Con9nuity  &  Enterprise  Risk  Management

Business Continuity Management Award 2013, 24 January 2013

Page 2: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Agenda  for  this  Session  

Explore and discuss the ‘business case’ for integrating Business Continuity Management (BCM) & Enterprise Risk Management (ERM).

þ  Conflicts & Competition between ERM & BCM functions þ  Comparing the ERM & BCM Frameworks, Process & Practices þ  Convergence of the ERM of BCM agendas þ  Understanding the life-cycle from Risk Issues to Business

Disruptions & Crises þ  Strengthening Value Creation & Sustainability by Integrating BCM &

ERM

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 2

Page 3: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

3

Risks  &  Crises..  BCM  or  ERM  issues?  

Terrorism Diseases

Earthquake

Pollution

Bank run

Subprime Explosion

NGO Attack Lawsuits

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 4: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Conflicts between ERM & BCM  

VS ERM BCM

­ SEPARATE often COMPETING Functions in Organizations ­ OVERLAPPING area of Responsibilities ­ Different OBJECTIVES, Focus & METHODOLOGICAL

Approaches

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 4

Page 5: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Different Origins for ERM & BCM  

VS ERM BCM

≠ IT departments,

with the IT Disaster Recovery program

Insurance Buying / Hazard

Risk Mgt

Both ERM & BCM have seen Tremendous SCOPE expansion and methodological development

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 5

Page 6: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

6 6

Financial & Hazard

Expanding  the  scope  of  ERM  

Finance Losses

Operational Strategic

Protect & Sustain

Operations

Create Value with effective Risk-taking

& Management Scope increase

➜ From Value PROTECTION to Value CREATION expanding to all risk domains

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 7: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 7

ERM Manage Risks & Opportunities Effectively to Ensure Achievement of Corporate Objectives

Page 8: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

RISK

   MAN

AGEM

ENT  

IT  DISAS

TER  RE

COVE

RY  

FACILITIES    M

ANAG

EMEN

T  

SUPP

LY  CHA

IN    M

ANAG

EMEN

T  

QUAL

ITY    M

ANAG

EMEN

T  

HEAL

TH  &  SAF

ETY  

KNOWLEDG

E    M

ANAG

EMEN

T  

EMER

GEN

CY    M

ANAG

EMEN

T  

SECU

RITY

 

CRISIS  COMMUNICAT

IONS  &  PR  

BCM - Business Continuity Management

Expanding  the  scope  of  BCM  

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 8

➜ From RECOVERY to CONTINUITY and from IT Processes to ALL Operations & Business processes

Page 9: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

BCM… MAINTAIN KEY Business Operations during challenging times

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 9

Page 10: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

CATALYST  for  the  ERM  &  BCM  ‘Explosion’!  

A continuous and constant stream of crises and corporate failures over the past 10-15 years have created a strong momentum for Risk, Crisis & Business management concepts.

9/11

Fukushima

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 10

Page 11: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

11 11

The  ERM  &  BCM  Explosion!  

Failures in managing risks effectively have triggered all over the world, efforts by: ¤ regulators, ¤ rating agencies, ¤ stock exchanges, ¤  institutional investors ¤ and corporate governance oversight bodies

… insist that company senior management take greater responsibility for managing proactively risks and critical disruption on an enterprise-wide scale.

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 12: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ERM  &  BCM  Best  Prac9ces  &  Standards  

BCM Standards þ  ISO 22301:2012 - Societal

security – Business continuity management systems (International)

þ  BS 25999:2007 - Business Continuity Management (BSI/UK) 1 Code of Practice & 2 Specification

þ  SS540:2008 - BCM Framework & Technical Reference (Singapore)

þ  NFPA1600 - Standard on Disaster/Emergency Management and Business Continuity Programs (ANSI/US)

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 12

ERM Standards þ  ISO 31000:2009 - Risk

Management Guideline (International)

þ  COSO:2004 - Integrated ERM Framework (US)

þ  AS/NZS 4360:2004 - Risk Management Standard (Australia/NZ)

þ  HM Treasury’s Orange Book:2004 – Management of Risk (UK)

þ  Rating Agencies Frameworks (S&P, Moodys)

Page 13: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

 ERM  vs  BCM  Area  of  Focus  &  Objec9ves  

13

- +

Target Performance

Expected Potential Losses

Expected Potential

Opportunities

Unexpected Catastrophic

Losses

Transformational Blue swans

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Catastrophic Losses

Black swans

Unexpected Opportunities

LOSS GAIN

Risk Can Lead to either Negative or Positive impact depending how it is managed..

Page 14: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

 ERM  vs  BCM  Area  of  Focus  &  Objec9ves  

14

- +

Target Performance

Expected Potential Losses

Expected Potential

Opportunities

Unexpected Catastrophic

Losses

Transformational Blue swans

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Catastrophic Losses

Black swans

Unexpected Opportunities

ERM  –  Create  Shared  Sustainable  Value  

BCM  –  Ensure  Business  Con9nuity  &  Societal  

Security    

LOSS GAIN

Page 15: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

BCM  perspec9ve:  How  to  Define  Business  Con9nuity?  

¤ Business Continuity is defined in British Standard for BCM (BS 25999:2006) as:

“.. The capability of an organization to plan for and respond to business interruptions in order to continue business operations at an acceptable pre-defined level”.

How to understand this definition?

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 15

Page 16: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Components  of  BS  25999  Defini9on  of  Business  Con9nuity  

Key components in the definition:

①  CAPABILITY to PLAN & RESPOND

②  To BUSINESS INTERRUPTION Events

③  To MAINTAIN KEY Business Operations

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 16

Page 17: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Components  of  BS  25999  Defini9on  of  Business  Con9nuity  

Key components in the definition:

①  CAPABILITY to PLAN & RESPOND ➜  Planning & building readiness is essential

②  To BUSINESS INTERRUPTION Events ➜  Focus on severe to critical threats

③  To MAINTAIN KEY Business Operations ➜  Focus on key processes and resources

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 17

Page 18: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

What  is  Business  Con9nuity  Management  then.  

¤ British Standard for BCM (BS 25999:2006) defines it as:

An “holistic management process that identifies potential threats to an organization and the impacts to business operations those threats, if realized, might cause, and which provides a framework for building organizational resilience with the capability for an effective response that safeguards the interests of its key stakeholders, reputation, brand and value-creating activities.”

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 18

Page 19: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

BCM  –  Business  Con9nuity  Management  Process...  

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 19

1 - BCM Program

Management

3 – DETERMINING BCM

STRATEGIES

4 – DEVELOP & IMPLEMENT BCM

RESPONSE

5 – EXERCISE, MAINTAIN &

REVIEW

Delivering better RESULTS

2 – UNDERSTAND THE

ORGANIZATION

Page 20: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

BCM  process  –  Underlying  Focus  

1 – Key Activities & FUNCTIONS

4 – Identify & Assess THREATS

The Trash Bin

3 – SCREEN based On CRITICALITY Not

critical?

6 – EXERCISING, Maintenance & Audit

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 20

5 – Design & Implement BCM Response

2 – Business IMPACT Analysis

Page 21: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ERM  Perspec9ve:  How  to  Define  RISK?  

¤  Risk is defined in ISO 31000: 2009 as:

“.. the effect of uncertainty on objectives”.

How to analyse this definition?

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 21

Page 22: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Components  of  ISO  31000  Defini9on  of  Risk  

Key components in the definition:

①  OBJECTIVES

②  UNCERTAINTY EFFECTS

③  EXPOSURE to Uncertainty

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 22

Page 23: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Components  of  ISO  31000  Defini9on  of  Risk  

Key components in the definition:

①  OBJECTIVES ➜  Something important you want to achieve

②  UNCERTAINTY EFFECTS ➜  Threats, Opportunities & Volatility. Can be the result of

our actions and others internal/external factors

③  EXPOSURE to Uncertainty ➜  (Your objectives and the processes and resources

that support them)

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 23

Page 24: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ISO  31  000  Guide  -­‐  Risk  Management  Process  

3  –  Risk  Assessment  

2  -­‐  Establish  the  Context  

3.2  Risk  Analysis  

5  –  Monitoring  &    Review  

1  –    Communica9on  &  Consulta9on  

3.1  Risk  Iden9fica9on  

4  -­‐  Risk  Treatment  

3.3  Risk  Evalua9on  

Managers can optimize the tradeoff between Risk and Return..

while consistently and systematically, and ensuring the timely communication of risk related information across the enterprise in a transparent manner.

…by identifying, assessing and assigning ownership, taking actions to mitigate or anticipate risks, and monitoring & reviewing progress

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 24

Page 25: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ISO  31000  –  GUIDE  for  Managing  Risk  

Principles Framework Process

2"–"Design"of"framework""for"managing"

•  Understanding+organiza.on+•  Risk+Management+policy+•  Integra.on+into+organiza.on+•  Accountability+•  Resources+•  Establish+Internal/External+

Context+

1"–"Mandate"&"Commitment"

5"–"Con8nual"improvement"of"the"framework"

3"–"Implemen8ng"Risk"Management"

•  Implemen.ng+the+Framework+•  Implemen.ng+the+Risk+

Management+Process+

4"–"Monitoring"&"Review"of"the"Framework"

3"–"Risk"Assessment"

2"."Establish"the"Context"

3.2"Risk"Analysis"5"–"Monitoring"&""

Review"

1"–""CommunicaCon"&"ConsultaCon"

3.1"Risk"IdenCficaCon"

4"."Risk"Treatment"

3.3"Risk"EvaluaCon"

!1)!creates!value.!2)!is!an!integral!part!of!organiza6onal!processes.!!3)!is!part!of!decision!making.!!4)!explicitly!addresses!uncertainty.!!5)!is!systema6c,!structured!and!6mely.!!6)!is!based!on!the!best!available!informa6on.!!7)!is!tailored.!!8)!takes!human!and!cultural!factors!into!account.!!9)!is!transparent!and!inclusive.!!10)!is!dynamic,!itera6ve!and!responsive!to!change.!!11)!facilitates!con6nual!improvement!and!enhancement!of!the!organiza6on.!!!

ERM is the System, Methodology & processes used by organizations to takes risk in a controlled manner so that the business is viable for a longer term (SUSTAINABILITY) while meeting the expectations of the stakeholders by CREATING SHARED VALUE in line with Corporate OBJECTIVES.

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 25

Page 26: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ERM  process  –  Underlying  Focus  

4 – Identify & Assess THREATS Based on Likelihood & Impact

1 – Corporate OBJECTIVES & Risk APPETITE

The Trash Bin

3 – SCREEN based on LIKELIHOOD × IMPACT

Low Priority

9 - Review & MONITORING (KRIs)

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 26

8 – Design & Implement ERM Controls

Page 27: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

27

In  SUMMARY:  Comparing  BCM  and  ERM  

BCM ERM Primary Focus Key Functions (Processes &

resources) Key Corporate Objectives & Risk Appetite

Protected Areas Balance sheet & reputation P&L, Cash flows & Market Capitalization

Operational Objectives

Ensure Crisis & Business Continuity preparedness (Exercising, testing)

Risk awareness & cost of risk control. Continuous process improvement, effective risk decision-making

Time Horizon of Assessment

Medium to long-term Short to Medium

Critical Dimension of Risk focus

The Business IMPACT The LIKELIHOOD

Type of Loss Exposure under watch

Severe to Catastrophic (High Impact) with medium to low frequency business interruptions

Expected Losses: High to medium frequency loss events with medium to severe impact

Strategic Objectives

Ensure Continuity of Critical Operations

Ensure Achievement of Corporate Objectives

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 28: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Nega9ve consequences of the lack of integration between ERM & BCM activities  

­ Unhealthy Competition for Management Attention & Resources

­ Double works & Uncoordinated/independent efforts to deal with the same risk issues

­ Resulting in waste and inefficiencies (increased expenses, both programs are expensive & wrong focus)

­  Increasing risk of critical failure to management risk and ensure business sustainability

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 28

Page 29: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

BCM  is  a  NATURAL  part  of  an  ERM  framework..  

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 29

You  could  see  Business  Con9nuity  Management  (BCM)  as…      Part  of  the  management  RESPONSE  to  an  important  risk  issue…      taking  its  place  during  the  Treatment  phase  alongside  with  risk  Preven9on  &  Transfer.  

Page 30: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Pressure

Time Potential Emerging Current Recovering

Life-­‐cycle  from  a  Risk  issue  to  a  Crisis  –  4  phases  

Media Coverage & amplification

Signal

CRISIS

Incident OR Signal

Issues Signal

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 30

Page 31: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Example: BP oil spill, Gulf of Mexico 2010

­ The catastrophe resulted in a loss of: –  Direct Cost to BP: Over $20 billion –  Market capitalization loss. i.e. cost to shareholders:

$87 billion

¤ BP explosion and oil spill could have been prevented with additional spending of $7 - $12 million on safety controls

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 31

Page 32: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Pressure

Time Potential Emerging Current Recovering

From  Risk  issue  to  Crisis:  BP  Gulf  of  Mexico  2010  

Media Coverage & amplification

Signal

CRISIS

Issues Signal

Opportunity to influence Difficult to influence

Maintenance equipment

Reports

Problems

Drop from news

Enormous cost & damage to reputation

Incident OR Signal

Explosion

Stop the leak & cleaning

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 32

Emergency evacuation & protection

Media onslaught

Page 33: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Impact  on  BP  share  price  /  market  capitaliza9on  

Gulf of Mexico Disaster

MTBE Contamination lawsuits

$243 Billions

$90 Billions

Enormous Shareholder Value Loss

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 33

Page 34: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Pressure

Time Potential Emerging Current Recovering

Life-­‐cycle  from  a  Risk  issue  to  a  Crisis  

Signal

CRISIS

Incident OR Signal

Issues Signal

Opportunity to influence Difficult to influence

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 34

Time for ACTION

REACTION Too Late!

Page 35: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Road  Map  to  Managing  Risk  &  Crisis:  The  steps  

35 BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 36: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

36

Pressure

Time Potential Emerging Current Recovering

Road  Map  to  Managing  Risk,  Crisis  &  Change

Signal

CRISIS

Incident OR Signal

Issues Signal

Opportunity to influence Difficult to influence

Media Coverage & amplification

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 37: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

 Cover  all  the  bases!  

37

- +

Target Performance

Expected Potential Losses

Expected Potential

Opportunities

Unexpected Catastrophic

Losses

Transformational Blue swans

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Catastrophic Losses

Black swans

Unexpected Opportunities

LOSS GAIN

Shareholders  and  Management  are  typically  concerned  with  variability  below  &  above  the  target  

You  should  also    be  looking  out  for  cri9cal  NEW  Changes  in  the  Biz  environment  

Organisa9ons  should  also    be  concerned  with  catastrophic  risks  &  the  risk  of  Insolvency  

Page 38: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Road  Map  to  Managing  Risk  &  Crisis:  The  Solu9ons  

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 38

Page 39: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

How  ERM  &  BCM  can  add  value  to  each  other?  

BCM can provide ERM with: þ  A better understanding of the critical activities (processes) and the

infrastructure & resources that support these with the BIA þ  A stronger focus on exercising and testing the risk mitigation framework þ  Promotes a better understanding communication dependency between

critical functions

ERM can provide BCM with: þ  A broader view of risk issues þ  A better definition of Corporate Objectives & understanding of Risk

Appetite þ  Systematic approach of consistently and continuously monitoring and

managing risk þ  A better view of any emerging threats and promotes cross functional

communication of key threats

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 39

Page 40: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

What  is  preven9ng  effec9ve  coordina9on  &  integra9on  between  ERM  &  BCM?  

­ Obstacle type 1: Resisting because of a cognitive difference of opinion about BCM & ERM mission, objectives, methodology & tools.

­ Obstacle type 2: Resistance due to emotional issues (Fears, ego, etc)

­ Obstacle type 3: Resistance due to Political or Personal issues ( Animosity, red tape, etc)

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 40

Page 41: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

In  conclusion:  Three  Models  for  ERM  and  BCM  in  a  organiza9on  

There are three different models for ERM & BCM in Organization: ­  STATUS QUO - is to maintain separate silos for both disciplines

with different teams, reporting lines, methodologies, etc.

þ  COORDINATION – by having a central management unit/function coordinating for both BCM and ERM activities.

þ  INTEGRATION – by integrating BCM functionally & methodologically into the ERM framework.

­  Unfortunately, the STATUS QUO model is what many organizations are doing today. It is more than time for change!

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 41

Page 42: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Marc  Ronez  -­‐  Chief  Risk  Strategist  &  Knowledge  Leader  at  ARiMI  -­‐  Asia  Risk  Management  Ins9tute  

An ERM & Governance expert with 20 years of experience both as a practitioner & trainer for large MNCs, Governments & Charities. Marc has an MBA from the University of Chicago GSB, an MSc in Insurance & a LLM from the University of La Sorbonne

What do I do? Help managers & leaders to use Risk Management to:

þ  Resolve difficult operational and business challenges þ  Take & manage risks effectively to build sustainable & profitable growth models

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Marc’s specific areas of expertise include ERM, risk decision-making processes, corporate governance, Business Ethics, Social Responsibility, risk-aware culture, risk communication and crisis management, business model/Strategy Risk Management, corporate learning systems development.

42

Page 43: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Risk  Management  is  a  con/nuous  journey,  not  a  des/na/on!  

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Marc Ronez is on Linked in & WordPress

You can find his profile & read his blogs at: P: sg.linkedin.com/pub/marc-ronez/1/3b6/465/ B: theriskmanagementparadox.com B: riskmanagementdemystified.com

43

Page 44: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

 ARiMI  –  Asia  Risk  Management  Ins9tute  

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 44

Page 45: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

ARiMI  is  an  applied  research  and  business  studies  ins0tute  that  was  set  up  in  2003  (in  partnership  with  NUS)  and  has  established  itself  as  the  Ins0tute  of  Reference  for  Enterprise  Risk  Management  studies  in  Singapore  and  in  the  region.    

 We  FOCUS  on  programs:    

1.   For  Decision-­‐Makers  (Middle  to  Top  Management):  Developing  PRACTICAL  Knowledge  &  Skills  in  Risk  &  Crisis  Management  

2.   For  Organiza9ons:  Building  CAPABILITIES  for  Sustainable  and  Profitable  Growth  by  EMBEDDING  Risk  Aware  &  Crisis  Readiness  Culture  

ARiMI,  Asia  Risk  Management  Ins9tute    

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 45

Page 46: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

     ARiMI  -­‐  Focus  and  Exper9se  

● Crisis management & Business Continuity

● Leadership risk decision-

making and Social Capital ● Reputational Risk &

stakeholders management ● Corporate governance &

business ethics

Research

● Professional Designation Programs

CERM (Certified Enterprise Risk Manager), CPRM (Certified Professional Risk Manager), ARM (Associate in Risk Management), FSRM (Fellow in Strategic Risk Management)

● Public Seminars and

Workshops ● Corporate Training &

learning Programs

Education

● Risks & Opportunities Assessment & Mapping

● Crisis & Business

Continuity Mgt ● Reputation Risk Mgt &

CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) ● Fraud Risk Mgt ● Risk Appetite & Risk

Aware Culture Readiness ● Project risk management ● Risk Champions

MasterClass

Expertise

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013 46

Page 47: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

47

For more information on ARiMI,

check our website at: www.arimi.org

BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013

Page 48: BCM vs ERM: The Business Case for Integration..

Important Note: Please note that that this presentation and its contents, is the intellectual property of the Asia Risk Management Institute Pte Ltd. It has been prepared for this BCM Award session and it cannot be used for any other purposes without the specific written consent of the Asia Risk Management Institute.

48 BCM vs ERM – Marc Ronez - Copyright @ ARiMI 2013