Baker's Book 1
-
Upload
ashish1981 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Baker's Book 1
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
1/8
As the examples drawn from our own comparative studies of bureaucrats and politicians in
Western countries democracies demonstrate, the U.S. administrative system is best understood
in a comparative context. . . . We not only understand our own systems better when we
compare, we gain a better understanding of the methods, concepts, and theories we em-
ploy. . . . The muddle of comparative administration may well be a hell, but one whose
suggested motto is abandon hope all ye who do not enter here! (Aberbach and Rockman
1988)
WHY THIS BOOK?
If only to appease the spirits of those departed trees sacrificed to produce a givenbook or article, authors and editors should be duty-bound to justify their addition to
Books in Print. The origins of this volume begin with attempts by a small group of
persons in the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration
(NASPAA), the professional accrediting body for public administration programs,
to bring the winds of international change into the curricula of the 230-plus member
institutions. That was, sad to say, a depressing experience since the indifference of
so many organizations to the geographical realities of the late-twentieth century
context of public life was, as the late Bill Siffin would have said, almost palpable.
Indeed, the international group quietly died from this lack of generalized support,
though NASPAA itself was always strongly supportive.
The reality is that it is not only President Clinton who has an agenda for
changethe world itself seems to be working with that agenda, and its impact on
U.S. public life is both comprehensive and accelerating dramatically. Publicadministration as a subject has long had a parochial cast, but even the most avowed
parochialist must be aware of some fairly radical forces at work in the local parish.
In Indiana, the economic mainstays and the revenue generators for public programs
1
Comparative Public Management:
Coming in From the Cold
Randall Baker
1
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
2/8
include automobiles and automobile accessories, agriculture, steel, and
pharmaceuticals. Not one of these operates in a state, or even a U.S., context. The
talk is about European agricultural subsidies, Japanese penetration of the auto
market, the impending employment nemesis accompanying the North American
Free Trade Agreement NAFTA that includes Mexico, the dumping of East European
steel on the American market, wholesale illegal copying of patented drugs, and so
on. At the same time, even mid-sized communities are actively trying to promote
foreign investmentsome say by giving away the store through intrastate and
interstate competition.
It has long been recognized by political scientists and pundits, from Washingtons
farewell address onward, that foreign affairs feature last in the public ranking of the
top ten policy issues of the day. President Clinton, indeed, asserted that he would
return the country to a domestic agenda and won many votes on that score. The
political history of the United States is one of exceptionalism, a deep suspicion ofinternational entanglements and organizations (unless there was a veto possibility
involved), periodic retreats into isolation, and an increasingly pervasive ignorance
of geography.
The Orthodox Approach to Teaching Public Administration
A glance at almost any major text book in the field of public administration
reveals a conspicuous absence of the word American (or, more strictly, the words
United States). The connotation is that the contents are somehowgeneric, perhaps
perpetuating the ideas of Woodrow Wilson. Quite possibly this is not the intention.
The authors are, after all, writing for the U.S. market, and this assumption is
understood. On the other hand, after the last world war there was quite an industry
exporting public management to developing countries as though it really was ageneric commodity (Baker 1991).
Of course, U.S. public administration and public management are distinctly a
product of the culture and history of this country and no other. Furthermore, the U.S.
system is dramatically different from almost all others in developed democracies.
Rowat (1990) has shown this difference admirably relative to the overall size of the
bureaucracy in terms of the working population (18 percent in the United States, 33
percent in France, and 38 percent in Sweden), the differences in the size and
importance of different levels of government, the degree of decentralization (70
percent local and regional in the United States, 13 percent in Italy), relative growth
in the size of the public service (1.3 percent in the United States versus 23 percent
in Sweden 19511981), the relative importance of public corporations (50 percent
of public employment in the United Kingdom, and 8 percent in the United States),
and the nature and composition of the upper echelons. These differences inthemselves are interesting and should be an explicit part of the consideration of U.S.
public administration. Some writers have, however, pointed to this gulf between the
2 Comparative Public Management
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
3/8
U.S. public administration system and those in other developed democracies as areason for the lack of interest in comparative study:
I continue to think that the underlying reason for this decline [of comparative public
administration since the 1950s and 1960s] has been our own ethnocentrism in continuing to
view American public administration, and the truly exceptional solutions we have found for
coping with our peculiarly presidentialist problems, as a general paradigm for the field as a
whole. (Riggs 1991, 475)
Comparative study has never achieved center-stage status in the profession. In
contrast to the requirements of the business schools professional organization,
there is no professionalrequirementto feature anything comparative, or international
for that matter, in the core teaching of a professional masters degree. Where this
material has been offered at all, it has usually been within the context of a
concentration, optional courses, or some sort of minor. Its status is somewhat akin
to that of the environmental dimension in engineering degree programs some years
ago, until that profession finally woke up to the fact that the public would not tolerate
constructions that polluted and the fact that there was money in clean technology.
Apart from its peripheral, specialist status, comparative study is also generally
acknowledged, as Riggs observed above, to have been in decline for some time,
which is unfortunate now that the international and global pressures of the
environment, trade blocs, terrorism, AIDS, tourism, finance, communications, and
almost every other aspect of life have changed so dramatically. Later in this book,
two of the contributors, Ventriss and Ryan, show conclusively how international the
agenda has become, even at the state level, and some of the wrong-headed things
we are doing to react to this.
Herein lies the purpose, and we hope the value, of this book. We should not bereacting, we should be anticipating, and we need to understand that the people
graduating from public administration education programs are going to have their
greatest impact, perhaps, ten years from now. This means that we should be
equipping them for that world, not this years or last. In other words the comparative
component, and an exposure to an international agenda, are something that every
public official emerging from a public administration program should havenot
some favored few headed for the State Department or the Peace Corps. One of the
missions of this book is to make it undeniably clear just how far into the global
context we have moved, even if our curricula still owe allegiance to Harry Truman
and Ike.
A New and Revitalized Approach
The approach to comparative study should now be an integrative one. Ferrel
Heady (1984, 48) has written, It is neither necessary nor feasible to strive for
restoration of the degree of autonomy and separatism once characteristic of the
Coming in From the Cold 3
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
4/8
burgeoning comparative public administration movement. Looking at the earlier
attempts to broaden the scope of our teaching, van Wart and Cayer (1990, 238)
observed that the major criticisms were that the field was too involved in the quest
for a comprehensive paradigm or metatheory, that it was not empirical enough, and
that it was too self-absorbed in academic concerns and insufficiently relevant.
The same pair of authors, reviewing the evidence presented in the leading
journals for a recent change of attitude and approach toward the comparative
context, observed the following characteristics:
[They] include a significant practitioner component, a substantial orientation toward policy
recommendations, a relative paucity of theory-testing studies, wide and mature coverage of
a range of studies, and methodological studies that seem slightly better than in the past, but
still far from ideal. The field as a whole, however, lacks features that give it clear identity (e.g.,
state-of-the-art critiques, methodological pieces, and broader, middle-range theorizing), and
thus the overall status of comparative public administration remains ambiguous. (Ibid. 238)
Another issue that lurks beneath the surface, closely related to the startling
pedagogical indifference to comparative and international material in the approved
core of degree programs, is the issue of tenure and promotion. A study conducted
by professor Larry Schroeder of the Maxwell School for NASPAAs now dormant
international activities section indicated clearly that younger faculty perceived,
rightly or wrongly, serious dangers in fooling with comparative fields before their
tenure was affirmed. Many thought that this was some sort of luxury reserved for
older, more secure faculty members. The general impression was that since this
material received no official recognition in accreditation or core course construction,
then it must be peripheral. In many cases they may well be wise to so believe. It is
not so long ago that a faculty member at Indiana Universitys School of Public and
Environmental Affairsone of the most international schools in the countrywas
advised not to mess around with this international study until the serious matter
of tenure was completed. The peripheral role is still the one that seems to prevail in
most institutions, forcing younger faculty to fit into the mold of the orthodoxy.
Heady stated the matter this way: . . . parochialism is a persistent dominant feature
of American public administration, evidenced in the curricula of institutions of
higher education and in the conduct of public administration by practicing
professionals (Heady 1987, 480).
THE APPROACH OF THIS BOOK
One of the principal concerns voiced at discussions about internationalizing
the curriculum for public administration at NASPAA was that there was no one to
teach this, especially in the smaller departments, and that there were no useful
books. The intention behind this book is that everyone can and should teach
comparative material. It is neither exotic, nor is it peripheral. As Bekke and others
4 Comparative Public Management
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
5/8
stated, Comparative analysis is integral to theory development and testing. It is
necessary for identification of key concepts, relations among concepts, and the
underlying logic or dynamic of the associations (Bekke et al. 1991, 28).
This book is intended as a vehicle that will allow all teachers to integrate some
comparative material into most of the major fields of public administration, or at
least understand why and how they should. The main purpose is to equip all public
servants with a new perspective on their own countrynot to make them authorities
on Sweden, Singapore, or some other place. For many years the business literature
ran article after article trying to discover the secret of the Japanese miracle, much
as they had done with the German miracle years earlier. The most accurate
conclusion from all this is that the secret of the Japanese miracle may be that they
are Japanese, and facile attempts at copying deny the reality of a U.S. cultural
context. We should, instead, be clear about what we do well, value, and feel we
should preserve. One of the best ways of understanding this is to examine how othersapproach the same problem, not that we may copy it, but that by making comparisons,
all sorts ofimplicitand underpinningcultural assumptions come out of the shadows.
This is as it should be. The secret of the American miracle may be revealed when
we finally realize that we are Americans, and ask what we do well and why that
works here. The main value of comparative study is to understand ourselves. Riggs
makes this point clearly in his chapter in this book, and presents this as a radical
revision in the thinking behind comparative study. It is also a profound reason why
comparative study should now be integral to all elements of the syllabus, finance,
management, policy, whatever.
What Comparative Study is Not
It is not the search for universal truths, generic culture-neutral models.
a vehicle to help us to copy.
descriptive; instead it is analytical. Articles about other places do not
necessarily qualify as comparative. We look instead for the analytical
underpinnings of comparison, and the utility of transferring policy and
practice across cultures.
a country a- and country b-type study that simply describes approaches
and practices from place to place apropos of nothing in particular.
The Structure and Purpose of the Book
The underlying purpose of this book is to provide, in one volume, the
following elements: the international context of public service in the United States.
an overview of the comparative approach.
comparative studies of different components of public administration as
taught in programs in the United Statesin effect: comparative modules.
Coming in From the Cold 5
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
6/8
The International Context. In this section two authors demonstrate, in concrete
terms, the pervasive significance of the international context in all areas of public
administration. In one study, Ventriss uses the medium of international trade to
illustrate the profound degree to which this has a decisive impact on both national
and subnational levels, demonstrating a need for awareness at all levels. Ryan
explores the practical importance of a comparative agenda in the training of future
public servants by looking at the realities of what practitioners dowhich is
frequently distinctly international. Riggs, emphasizing his belief that comparative
study is a major tool for understanding the American system, presents a study of why
the bureaucracy has not assumed the smothering political role it has in other
presidential systems and highlights the unique historical and cultural qualities of
this countrys bureaucratic institutions and traditions. A concluding article by Baker
illustrates the malaise of public service in a developed state that has, until recently,
been denied democratic rights. This study is used to illustrate the crucial role ofdemocratic principles embodied, but possibly well hidden, in the operation of our
national bureaucracy.
The Comparative Approach. The strengths and pitfalls of the comparative
method over time are explored in this section by two authors approaching the subject
from a different perspective. Though this book is not devoted to theories of
government, it is necessary to present the state-of-the-art on the methods and utility
of the comparative approach. Making comparisons is fraught with problems of
definition, overlapping terminology, different roles for the state in a democracy, and
so forth. All too often the conceptual framework for comparative study has been
woolly or indefinable. Peters provides an exhaustive insight into the comparative
tradition and provides useful guidelines for the application of this dimension. He
examines many of the worrisome questions about how far we are looking at
universal management principles and practices, and how far at culture-specificaspects such as the role of the state, acceptable levels of taxation, the role of the
family, etc. Carrying these ideas forward, McGregor outlines a research agenda to
give comparative study of the public service more relevance and methodological
integrity in the future.
The Component Elements. In this final section authorities from different
recognized fields of public administration provide an examination of the comparative
element in each field. Each study provides a module that may be used to broaden
the dimensions of the course material taught within any conventional MPA or
related public administration degree in this country. We hope this takes care of the
questions, Who teaches this? and Where are the books?
Insinuating the comparative approach into the broad spectrum of the public
administration curriculum is but one element. Institutions may also pursue exchange
programs, the utilization of visiting overseas professionals and academics (to talkabout the United States and not just their home country), creative use of international
students, and other avenues. But until full recognition of the value of comparative
study shows up in the baseline requirements for the professional degree, and as a
6 Comparative Public Management
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
7/8
fully recognized legitimate area of study for tenure purposes, I fear we are dealing
with little more than lip service.
This book was deliberately called Comparative Public Managementto stress
its applied and practical nature. Managementis also a word that carries with it
connotations of dynamism and the need to anticipate and respond to change. Ours
is a world in which change is the order of the day, and sometimes it appears that the
pace of change is itself moving along an exponential curve. On the other hand, the
use of the term management must not be taken to imply any crude idea that
government is a businessfor it is not.
The authors of this book are concerned with the way in which problems are
tackled, rights defended, society advanced, and the earth protected around the
globe. Consider, for instance, what is happening in the health field. In Britain the
nanny state is finding itself financially unable to bear the burden of supporting a
universal health system. In the United States the concern is about the states inactionsince more than 30 million people, supposedly, are without health insurance. Are
these two nations facing different crises, or are they converging toward some
practical middle ground of state involvement in health-care delivery? Most
developed democracies are facing tax revolts and are coping with AIDS, privatization,
footloose capital, aging populations, and many other common phenomena. All too
often these are perceived as national issues amenable only to national solutions.
Deliberately we have held our frame of reference to the developed democracies,
for once we move outside it, many other variables start to assume critical importance,
and these modules will be much harder to teach. For many students the move to a
radically different (National Geographic class, as one student put it) cultural
context may result in all comparisons being rendered inoperative because there is
no way for the student to relate to the society involvedat least without deeper
instruction than the typical Master of Public Administration program could provide.Again, this should not be taken as saying that developing democracies require
fundamentally different principles, concepts, and methods. It is just that the
preoccupation of the earlier comparative movement with developmentleft many in
the teaching profession out of the picture. At one astonishing annual meeting of the
American Society of Public Administration held in Miami not too long ago, there
was a two-day development jamboree held before the conference. On the other hand
there was almost nothing to reflect the multiethnic workforce, or the culture of
public administration in the subsequent main program, even though the whole event
was inMiami! In the face of such cultural insensitivity, what hope has comparative
awareness?
Our focus, as we have stated, is to put the United States center stage, for it is
there that the vast majority of the students will inevitably work. Incidentally the
predominance of the U.S. job market was often used in the past as a reason for notmessing with the international dimension. While we are so wrapped up right now
in the need to reinvent government, it is sad to note that the principal work on this
subject, and most of the political rhetoric since, continues to be stalwartly parochial.
Coming in From the Cold 7
-
7/29/2019 Baker's Book 1
8/8
We seem to be on the eve of a true millenniuma world in which new territorial
polities emerge for which there is no precedent, such as the European Community.
It is also a world in which global phenomena, such as ozone depletion or the
possibility of global warming, produce consequences that are global. This stretches
our comfortable concepts of national sovereignty to the limits, and perhaps beyond.
Future public administrators may live not only in an increasingly international and
global context, but in a world in which shared sovereignty becomes a reality in some
fields.
The comparative element is a context. Rather than thinking of it as a field, or
subfield, it should be thought of as an essential dimension of all parts of the basic
curriculum. It is true that some of the larger schools and programs may also support
a specialized concentration, but that should be in addition to the first line of attack.
In fact anything that creates the illusion that comparative and international study is
different can be misleading because it goes against the contextual approach. In1947 Dahl stated, As long as public administration is not comparative, claims for
a science of public administration sound rather hollow. Nothing has changed the
relevance of this remark in the intervening 45 or so years.
REFERENCES
Aberbach, J. D., and B. A. Rockman. 1988. Problems of Cross-National Comparison. In
Public Administration in Developed Democracies: A Comparative Study, ed. D. C.
Rowat. New York: Marcel Dekker, 419440.
Baker, R. 1991. The Role of the State and the Bureaucracy in Developing Countries Since
the War. In Handbook of Comparative and Development Administration, ed. A.
Farazmand. New York: Marcel Dekker, 353367.
Bekke, H., J. L. Perry, and Th. A. J. Toonen. 1991. The Need for Comparative Research on
Civil Service Systems. Conference on comparative civil service systems, Leiden/
Rotterdam, October (unpublished).
Dahl, R. A. 1947. The Science of Public Administration. Public Administration Review
7:111.
Heady, F. 1984. Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Marcel
Dekker.
_____. 1987. Comparative Public Administration in the United States. In A Centennial
History of the American Administrative State, ed. R. Candler. New York: Free Press.
Riggs, F. W. 1991. Public Administration: A Comparativist Framework. Public
Administration Review 51(6).
Rowat, D. C. 1990. Comparing Bureaucracies in Developed and Developing Countries: A
Statistical Analysis.International Review of Administrative Sciences 56:211236.
van Wart, M., and N. J. Cayer. 1990. Public Administration: Defunct, Dispersed, or
Redefined? Public Administration Review 50.
8 Comparative Public Management