Back to the Future. The End of IoT
-
Upload
cast-inc -
Category
Devices & Hardware
-
view
78 -
download
0
Transcript of Back to the Future. The End of IoT
Back to the Future:The End of IoT
Bill FinchCAST, Inc.
Slide 2 IP-SoC 2016
Internet of ThingsIoT
IoT
IoT
IoT
Internet of Things
Internet of Things
IoTIoT IoT
IoT
Slide 3 IP-SoC 2016
A Misused PhraseAutomotive isn’t a part
We’ve had connected cars for years –On Star, Celluar, GPS are not the internetInternal systems are not the internet
Smart phones and tablets are not a partExisted well before IoTReally small portable computers, i.e. evolutionary
What else is not a partWine bottles, refrigerators, college dorm bathrooms, cat feedersJust because we can connect it doesn’t mean we shouldCBYC
Slide 4 IP-SoC 2016
Not IoT; ConnectivityWe can connect anything to anything
2006 Embedded Conference in BostonFocus on economic value to Customers/Users
Currently blinded by CBYCVisicalc
Two questionsWhat needs to be connected and how?What will these things talk about to add value?
Slide 5 IP-SoC 2016
The 1st Wave of ConnectivityWhere we are now
IDM’s did a superb job of enablingSensors of all types are reasonably availableCameras equally availableCost is an issueSecurity is a huge issue
CYBC has created access that can be exploitedInnovation is slowing
Evolution not revolutionDriverless cars are interesting, but….
Slide 6 IP-SoC 2016
The 2nd Wave Starts SoonWhat doesn’t need to be connected
My house doesn’t need moreMy car doesn’t need moreI don’t need moreMy business?
MaybeWhat will add value
Reduced energy usageReduced water usageReduced waste
Slide 7 IP-SoC 2016
Energy ExampleElectric cars are a big deal, but so are commercial buildings
Smart meters, etc. are great, but not the whole solutionBuildings, particularly older ones, are not set up for monitoring. Landlords don’t really know who’s doing what. Tenants don’t either.
Innovative solutions for tenantsSmall networks that tenants can use to monitor their spaceInexpensive and simple. Make it a “no brainer”.
Slide 8 IP-SoC 2016
WaterJust ask people in CaliforniaWe have big systems for big farmersScale the solutions for small users
Easy to do if the cost comes downAnother “no brainer”
Slide 9 IP-SoC 2016
Reduce WasteMuch tougher to quantify
Preventive maintenance“What counts is what you count”Need inside information from real customers
Pillar TechnologiesBoston start upFocused on reducing waste at construction sitesNetwork of moisture and temperature sensors that monitor materials inventories once they are delivered to a site. Local level reporting.
Slide 10 IP-SoC 2016
SecurityOf course it’s a big deal
We’ll never secure the whole thingIf everything has to be “bullet proof”, the cost will be too high for many applicationsFocus on local solutions
You don’t have to tell everybody everything all the time
Slide 11 IP-SoC 2016
Back to the FutureGet as close as possible to real customer’s needs
Can mega companies do this?Design inexpensive solutions
Mega company overheads make this difficult at start up volumes
Where will we get the true innovators?ARPA-E (Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy)EEE-F (European Energy Efficiency Fund)Where is private capital?
Slide 12 IP-SoC 2016
IP SoC 16 Panel: Globalization - The challenge to the worldwide IP business from Infrastructure to Legal and Finance
Slide 13 IP-SoC 2016
Globalization Mergers and AcquisitionsProcess TechnologyAs always, money is the driving force
Challenges
Slide 14 IP-SoC 2016
Market ExpansionSell more
Cost ReductionMake it more cheaply
Globalization
Slide 15 IP-SoC 2016
Lower CostEconomies of scale
Market ExpansionAddress different segments or geographies
Mergers and Acquisitions
Slide 16 IP-SoC 2016
Smaller GeometriesLower manufacturing costsAssumes process yield stays the same
Process Technology
Slide 17 IP-SoC 2016
Mukun PaiProgram Manager, Intel
Anne Meixner, PhDThe Engineers Daughter, LLC
Philippe QuinoGroup Vice-President, IP Sourcing & Strategy, ST Microelectronics
Gabrielle SaucierOur host and CEO of Design and Reuse
Panelists
Slide 18 IP-SoC 2016
IP Publishing by IP providers Can we adopt a standard for describing our IP?All the meta data – part number, config, provider, etc.
IP data in SoC ( from design to manufacturing and back)
Is this still an issue?Every user has their own methods?
IP in SoC /Product and Business relations Can we adopt a standard for all the legal and financial tracking?Are we facing new legal issues around usage and royalty tracking?
Questions