Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs...
-
Upload
dinah-harris -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs...
![Page 1: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011
Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based
evaluation approaches.
Margaret Scott, Senior Consultant WestWood Spice, Sydney
![Page 2: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
• Need to build evidence base • Need to capture successes• Need to build capacity• Need to influence service managers, non-
Aboriginal workers, funders and policy makers and community
• Need for appropriate approaches to legitimise Aboriginal ways of working
![Page 3: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Context
• Services and programs • Settings - mainstream & Aboriginal community
controlled• Partnerships between services - variable• Different ways of working needed• Mismatch with mainstream protocols,
frameworks, indicators
![Page 4: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Case studies
• MRAMSA Review of mental health and social and emotional well-being services.
• Capacity building review of NSW aboriginal Sexual Health Worker Network
• Review of SSWAHS Aboriginal Chronic Disease Program.
• Evaluation of Aboriginal Legal Access Program• Evaluation of Walgan Tilly – Aboriginal Chronic
Disease Program.
![Page 5: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Aboriginal workers – the vital links
• Ways of working– community engagement, outreach,
informal/indirect, cultural/community protocols• Cultural & community knowledge • Conduits to services, advocates for community• Multiple roles, community expectations• Racism & discrimination• Personal & community issues
![Page 6: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Evaluation challenges/opportunities
• Lack of program/service planning/logic• Variable quality & approaches• Poor data collection systems• Inconsistent roles• Workforce capacity & experience variable• Need appropriate indicators, meaningful data• Navigating sensitivities & politics• Relationship building
![Page 7: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Approaches
• Flexible, tailored to purpose – mixed methods• Strengths based – appreciative focus• Consultative, participatory • Capacity building• Cultural considerations• Strong scoping, attention to framing questions• Attention to outcomes as well as process• Settings/informal conversations – “yarn-ups” • Feedback & checking findings
![Page 8: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Levels of influence
• Workers• Non-Aboriginal workers• Managers• Funders, policy makers• Other service providers• Community members
![Page 9: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Overall comments
• Many examples of quality programs – local successes• Diversity, innovation• Leadership matters• Strong partnerships essential• Service capacity is building incrementally• Need for – workforce reform, development & support– robust logic models – impact pathways, appropriate
indicators– advocacy with mainstream, cultural competence
![Page 10: Australasian Evaluation Society Conference 2011 Influencing best practice in Aboriginal programs through strengths based evaluation approaches. Margaret.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062806/5697c02f1a28abf838cda6c7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusion
• Quality Aboriginal community based programs and services are models of best practice for the whole community.
• Current opportunities with focus on Closing the Gap
• Need for ongoing capacity building