Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis...

24
Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris Wikle

Transcript of Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis...

Page 1: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool

Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris Wikle

Page 2: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Methodology

• Procrustes Scheme– In Greek mythology, Damastes, was a thief

who often went by the name Procrustes and offered travelers a bed to rest

– The twist was he would “fit” the travelers to the bed…stretching them if they were too short and cutting their limbs off if they were too tall

Journal of Hydrology article forthcoming Micheas et al.

Page 3: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Methodology

• So in this context we will fit forecast cells to truth cells by shifting location, resizing the object, and rotating them if necessary

• Origin use is in biology (anatomy) for lining up jaw bones (landmarks) or other structure for classification

• Works with gridded data of any dimensions for spatial objects, originally designed for ensembles

Page 4: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Methodology

• Define a penalty function– Takes into account

max,mean,min intensity, location fitting

– May be user defined (apply weights)

– The lower the penalty the better the forecast

kjijkjk

j zercz jk̂ˆˆˆ

kkkk SSSSSSRSSD maxminavg

Page 5: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Advantages

• Reduction of dimensionality for speed (less than 1 minute to run on a fair sized domain)

• Takes into account shape information with intensity data

• Can alter the penalty function to get more meaningful data

• Error decomposition• User defined thresholds

Page 6: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Shortcomings

• Memory issue when running a large domain with a lot of identifiable cells– Can break down domain however

• The total penalty function adds error components that may not of the same magnitude– Can refine these in the future

• Relative comparison (interpretation)

Page 7: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Results

• Entire domain penalty was calculated by using 0.10” (memory issue)

• Minimum size of cell set to 10 pixels

• Divided domain into NE,NW,SE,SW quadrants

• Recalculated penalties based on 0.01” again minimum size set to 10 pixels

Page 8: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

13 May 2005 – WRF4NCAR

Page 9: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

13 May 2005 – Stage 2

Page 10: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Fits – WRF4NCAR

Page 11: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Total Penalties – Entire Domain

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

RSS (1*10^3) 5.9151 5.4487 4.8603

SStot (1*10^3) 1.7531 2.3083 1.9005

# Cells

(Truth = 17)

26 61 39

Tot Error (1*10^5)

2.6607 5.7858 2.8416

Page 12: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Error Decomposition – Entire Domain

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

Min Intensity 2 4 4

Mean Intensity 8926 26825 9079.9

Max Intensity 2521220 5463000 2702100

Translation 4.6711 22.669 11.596

Rotation 0 0 0

Dilation 428290 7736700 1176000

Page 13: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

NW Domain- 13 May 2005(clockwise NCAR, NCEP, CAPS, Stage 2)

Page 14: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Total Penalties – NW Domain

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

RSS (1*10^3) 5.8255 5.7583 5.34

SStot (1*10^3) 3.4659 3.8712 3.4335

# Cells

(Truth = 39)

50 33 37

Tot Error (1*10^4)

0.96153 1.8417 1.1106

Page 15: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Error Decomposition – NW Domain

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

Min Intensity 0 0 0

Mean Intensity 104.78 297.67 148.31

Max Intensity 3685 12361 5618

Translation 32.488 13.969 15.15

Rotation 0 0 0

Dilation 797540 691740 758880

Page 16: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

1 June 2005 – WRF4NCAR

Page 17: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Stage 2

Page 18: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Total Penalties

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

RSS (1*10^3) 4.3458 3.8631 4.7510

SStot (1*10^3) 1.7761 2.3113 1.8553

# Cells

(Truth = 48)

59 109 49

Tot Error (1*10^5)

3.8423 3.4230 3.4501

Page 19: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Error Decomposition

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

Min Intensity 18 13 11

Mean Intensity 16151 12394 14009

Max Intensity 363710 326030 326240

Translation 5.5781 8.139 6.3785

Rotation 0.0001 0 0

Dilation 1085000 1945500 1316600

Page 20: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

NW Domain- 01 June 2005(clockwise NCAR, NCEP, CAPS, Stage 2)

Page 21: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Total Penalties – NW Domain

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

RSS (1*10^4) 1.1838 1.6253 1.4684

SStot (1*10^3) 2.9221 3.9807 2.9628

# Cells

(Truth =30)

53 50 58

Tot Error (1*10^4)

1.7542 3.8873 2.3150

Page 22: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Error Decomposition – NW Domain

WRF4NCAR WRF4NCEP WRF2CAPS

Min Intensity 0 0 0

Mean Intensity 184.91 425.37 60.646

Max Intensity 5519 22194 8405

Translation 59.107 12.883 30.551

Rotation 0 0 0

Dilation 3217400 357250 827400

Page 23: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Conclusions

• A lot of weight is given to intensity forecasts as well as position/shape

• June 1 forecast are all handled equally well by the models

• WRF4NCAR handles intensity the best for May 13 although WRF2CAPS is close on position

• WRF4NCEP underestimates intensity in most cases

Page 24: Atmospheric Science Department University of Missouri - Columbia A Procrustes Shape Analysis Verification Tool Steve Lack Sakis Micheas Neil Fox Chris.

Atmospheric Science DepartmentUniversity of Missouri - Columbia

Acknowledgements

• Stat Group: Sakis Micheas, Chris Wikle, Yong Song, Kent Peng

• Rains Group: George Limpert and Neil Fox

Award # ATM-0434213