Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

29
ASERL’s Collaborative Federal Depository Program: Innovating within a Regulatory Framework Bonnie MacEwan, Auburn University David Durant, East Carolina University Bill Sudduth, University of South Carolina ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN RESEARCH LIBRARIES

Transcript of Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Page 1: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

ASERL’s CollaborativeFederal Depository Program:

Innovating within a Regulatory Framework

Bonnie MacEwan, Auburn UniversityDavid Durant, East Carolina University

Bill Sudduth, University of South Carolina

ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN RESEARCH LIBRARIES

Page 2: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Association of Southeastern Research Libraries (ASERL)Collaborative Federal Depository Program (CFDP)

Bill Sudduth

Head, Government Information, Microforms, Newspapers, and Maps

University of South Carolina

Page 3: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

CFDP Goals• Collections – complete cataloged collections based

on an agency (Dept. of Education), topic (Panama Canal), or format (maps)

• Spaces – shared spaces throughout the southeast

• Services – Centers of Excellence (COE) supported by expertise and access to collections

• Tangible item based program

o COE collects copies for access as well as preservation

o Collections at regionals are above Tittle 44 requirements

Page 4: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Parallel Projects – One Outcome

IMLS Grant

• Oct 2009-Sept 2012

• South Carolina (US Dept. of Ed 1979-, Kentucky (WPA), Florida (Canal Zone) and ASERL

• Proof of concept for CFDP

• Inventory, catalog, identify gaps, and develop tools to complete targeted collections based on local strengths

ASERL Guidelines for FDLP Collections

• Dean’s Implementation Plan

• Draft approved April 2010

• Final approved April 2011

• Administrative support to implement a developing proof of concept

• Commitment to expanding Centers of Excellence concept

• Development of the ASERL Disposition tool

Page 5: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

A Dean’s Perspective

Bonnie MacEwan

Dean, University Libraries

Auburn University

Page 6: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

What has changed?

• All of our processes

• The nature of our collections

• Our workflows and staffing

• Our public areas

Page 7: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Collections• Paper to electronic

• Owned to licensed

• Delivered to user’s desktop or office

• “Just In Case” to “Just In Time” selection models

• Information in short supply to Information Overload

• Paper on a shelf to many delivery mechanisms –iPad, iPhone, computer -- and trusty paper

Page 8: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Are government documents a collection?

• Collections are managed

• Collections are selected to serve the primary clientele

• Collections are made available to other users but not collected for them

• Collections support the reputational aspirations of the holding institution

Page 9: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Auburn University LibrariesGovernment Documents Collection

Over 1 million paper volumes

Over 2 million microfiches/microcards

Occupies ¼ of the 1st floor of the library

Occupies ¼ of the closed stacks area

A depository since 1907

Page 10: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

But are these documents…

“Free” likea beer?

“Free” likea puppy?

Page 11: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Costs?

• Cost to process

• Cost to maintain

• Cost of the space

Page 12: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Service questions

• Who is using the collection?

• How are they using it?

• What are the alternatives?

Page 13: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Why the ASERL FDLP Plan?• We need to explore a viable alternative – the current plan is

not sustainable

• ASERL is the right group, the right size and has the right mission and history of cooperation

• ASERL has a strong organizational structure and leadership

• We have the expertise and energy including the expertise Judy Russell brings

• We are motivated – like most large library deans, we believe the time has come

Page 14: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

How this would be an improvement

• My library has a huge investment in terms of space and other resources

• Much material is not cataloged so it is not really accessible even if we have it

• The model of depending on a staff member to interpret the collection is long out of date

• Current GPO policies do not reflect the way users access and find information

Page 15: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Tough Love• I’m a collections person. I value well selected, accessible, well

maintained collections

• I value subject expertise

• I am concerned about patron access

• I am concerned about the lack of discovery for government documents

• I know we have to respond to change

• If documents collections don’t change, they will die of their own weight

Page 16: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

The ASERL plan

• Probably isn’t perfect and may need to change over time

• It does make sense

• It doesn’t threaten the existence of government documents

• It doesn’t mandate that any ASERL member get rid of anything -- although it provides the opportunity for Selectives

• It’s a start and it’s past time to get started

Page 17: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

A Regional’s Perspective

Bill Sudduth

Head, Government Information, Microforms, Newspapers, and Maps

University of South Carolina

Page 18: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Requirements of a Regional Federal

Depository Library (Title 44)• Retain publications permanently, except superseded

(Section 1911)

• Receive copies of all new and revised publications authorized for distribution (Section 1912)

• Provide ILL, reference service and assistance to depository in the disposal of unwanted publications (Section 1912)

• Permit depository libraries, within the area served by them, to dispose of publications which they have retained for 5 years after first offering them to other depository libraries within their area, then to other libraries (Section 1912)

Source: Legal Requirements & Program Regulations of the Federal Depository Library Program, June 2011, p. 3

Page 19: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Withdrawal of depository material

• Three options in the current guidelines

o Require Selectives to compile lists of publications they wish to withdraw from their collections

• Specific categories of formats can be exempted

o Conduct an in-person review of the publications to be discarded

o Require Selectives to check discards against the regional’s or a union “needs” list

Source: Legal Requirements & Program Regulations of the Federal Depository Library Program, June 2011, p. 9 (Guideline #61)

Page 20: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

• Need for retrospective cataloging

• Ensure complete collections

oDo we need 10 complete collections in SE?

• Managed approach to build targeted collections based on local strength and expertise

• Collections + expertise = value

• Outreach + training = public awareness

A Regional’s Perspective

Page 21: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

• Original partner on IMLS grant

• Academic interest with strong Education programs

• U.S. Department of Education (1979-current)

o Issues related to a current on going agency

o Multiple formats

o Assumption that collections are cataloged

• Many Selectives in SC are weeding paper collections –opportunity to fill gaps and build what might become the ONLY tangible collection in the state

• Leverage the strengths of the ASERL partnership including shared catalog and ILL delivery

University of South Carolina

Page 22: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

A Selective’s Perspective

David Durant

Federal Documents & Social Sciences Librarian

East Carolina University

Page 23: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

• Member since 1951

• Selective Depository (currently receives 68% of available items)

• Legacy collection in print and microfiche; Electronic collection

• Largest depository east of the Triangle

The J. Y. Joyner Libraryin the FDLP

Page 24: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Why is the J. Y. Joyner Library

Involved in CFDP?

• Enhance role within ASERL

• Build ties to other depository libraries in the region and foster greater local and regional cooperation

• Help preserve print documents

Page 25: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

• Increase awareness and visibility of federal documents at the J. Y. Joyner Library (enhance value of legacy print collection)

• Greater ability to build collection as needed

• Streamlined, more rapid and efficient Needs & Offers process

• Involvement in ASERL program increases our commitment to and effectiveness within the FDLP

Why is the J. Y. Joyner Library

Involved in CFDP?

Page 26: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Why HUAC/HCIS?• Great historic importance

• Tied to other library collections (ex: Hoover Collection)

• Relatively small collection

• Already cataloged

• Already have sizable holdings (250 HUAC, 60 HCIS)

• Retrospective (1938-1975: no major growth)

Page 27: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Issues• Filling gaps in collection

(pre-1950 materials in particular)

• Circulation?

• Obtaining second copies

• Digitization?

• Promotion / rollout

• Web presence

Page 28: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Questions?

Page 29: Aserl cfdp 2011 11_2

Contact InformationDavid DurantEast Carolina UniversityJ. Y. Joyner LibraryGreenville, NC 27858Ph. (252) 328-2258E-mail: [email protected]

ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEASTERN RESEARCH LIBRARIES

Bonnie MacEwan, DeanAuburn University LibrariesAuburn, Al 36849-5606Ph. (334) 844-1714E-mail: [email protected]

Bill SudduthUniversity of South CarolinaThomas Cooper LibraryColumbia, SC 29208Ph. (803) 777-1775E-mail: [email protected]