Architectural Testing - Tubelite Inc. · NFRC 102-2010 THERMAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT ... EMF vs...
-
Upload
dangkhuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
231 -
download
0
Transcript of Architectural Testing - Tubelite Inc. · NFRC 102-2010 THERMAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT ... EMF vs...
Layer 1: 1/4"90% Argon*
Reference must be made to Report No. C5870.01-116-46, dated 11/08/13 for complete testspecimen description and data.
Viracon VNE163 (e=0.040*, #2)SS-D: Viracon ExtremeEdge Stainless Steel SpacerPilkington Energy Advantage (e=0.154*, #4)Layer 2:
Unit Size: 44" x 88-1/8" (1118 mm x 2238 mm) (Non-Standard Size)0.56
Summary of ResultsStandardized Thermal Transmittance (U-Factor)
0.53"1/4"
Gap 1:
NFRC 102-2010 THERMAL PERFORMANCETEST REPORT
Rendered to:
TUBELITE, INC.
SERIES/MODEL: Thermal Door w/ T24000 Framing - Glass #1TYPE: Swinging Door with Frame
Architectural Testing
130 Derry Court York, PA 17406-8405 phone: 717-764-7700 fax: 717-764-4129 www.archtest.com
Report Number:Test Date:
Report Date:
03/19/13
NFRC Standard Size:
Reed City, Michigan 49677
Thermal Door w/ T24000 Framing - Glass #1
Swinging Door with Frame
Overall Size: 37.8" x 82.3" (960 mm wide x 2090 mm high)
Test Sample Identification:
TUBELITE, INC.4878 Mackinaw Trail
C5870.01-116-46
Type:
0.56
Test Procedure: U-factor tests were performed in a Guarded Hot Box in accordance withNFRC 102-2010, Procedure for Measuring the Steady-State Thermal Transmittance ofFenestration Systems .
Btu/hr·ft2·F (CTS Method)Standardized U-factor (Ust):
Test Sample Submitted by:
Test Results Summary:
Client
11/08/13
Series/Model:
44" x 88-1/8" (1118 mm x 2238 mm) (Non-Standard Size)
Rendered to:
NFRC 102-2010 THERMAL PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT
Architectural Testing
130 Derry Court York, PA 17406-8405 phone: 717-764-7700 fax: 717-764-4129 www.archtest.com
Test Sample Description:
*Stated per Client/Manufacturer N/A Non-Applicable
Corner Joinery:
*Stiles were AU (0.18"), Top Rail was AT (0.28"), Bottom Rail was AT (0.30")
Gap 1:
Gray
Interior Finish:Exterior Color:Interior Color:
Size:
*Jambs were AU (0.18"), Sill was AT (0.27"), Head was AT (0.28")
Glazing Method:Exterior Finish:
Page 2 of 8
N/AAnodized
Square Cut / Threaded Rod / Unsealed
Single-Probe Method*
SS-D: Viracon ExtremeEdge Stainless Steel SpacerPilkington Energy Advantage (e=0.154*, #4)
AP: Aluminum with Thermal Breaks - Partial*
ExteriorSize:
Interior Color:
0.53"1/4"
Layer 1:
Anodized
Daylight Opening:
44" x 88-1/8" (Non-Standard Size)Material:
Frame:
Interior Finish:
Corner Joinery:
C5870.01-116-46
AP: Aluminum with Thermal Breaks - Partial*
N/A
Glazing Method:
Square Cut / Screws / Unsealed
Panel:
AnodizedGrayExterior Color: Exterior Finish:
Daylight Opening:
29-7/8" x 69-1/8"
GrayGray
39-3/4" x 85-1/8"Material:
Anodized
Layer 2:
Glazing Information:
Gas Fill Method:
1/4" Viracon VNE163 (e=0.040*, #2)90% Argon*
Architectural Testing
Test Sample Description: (Continued)
Weatherstripping:
Hardware:
Drainage:
AT (0.27") threshold 1 Sill
Vinyl element inhibitor 2 Top and bottom rail
Quantity
Lock stileMetal handle 1
Description
Sloped sill
Full-mortise butt hinge 3
Flexible hollow bulb gasket 1 row
Drainage Method Size Quantity Location
7 Four per lock jamb, three per hinge jambAT (0.27") snap in filler
Aluminum door stop 3 Head and jambs
Quantity
Location
Exterior glazing perimeter
Lock assembly
Location
Head and jambs
Hinge jamb/stile
Description
EPG door gasket 1 row
1 Lock stile
EPG door gasket 1 row Interior glazing perimeter
C5870.01-116-46Page 3 of 8
Architectural Testing
Measured Test Data
Heat Flows1. Total Measured Input into Metering Box (Qtotal) Btu/hr 2. Surround Panel Heat Flow (Qsp) Btu/hr 3. inches4.5. Metering Box Wall Heat Flow (Qmb) Btu/hr 6. EMF vs Heat Flow Equation (equivalent information) 0.0334*EMF + 0.0097. Flanking Loss Heat Flow (Qfl) Btu/hr 8. Net Specimen Heat Loss (Qs) Btu/hr
Areas1. Test Specimen Projected Area (As) ft2
2. Test Specimen Interior Total (3-D) Surface Area (Ah) ft2
3. Test Specimen Exterior Total (3-D) Surface Area (Ac) ft2
4. Metering Box Opening Area (Amb) ft2
5. Metering Box Baffle Area (Ab1) ft2
6. Surround Panel Interior Exposed Area (Asp) ft2
Test Conditions1. Average Metering Room Air Temperature (th) F2. Average Cold Side Air Temperature (tc) F3. Average Guard/Environmental Air Temperature F4. Metering Room Average Relative Humidity %5. Metering Room Maximum Relative Humidity %6. Metering Room Minimum Relative Humidity %7. Measured Cold Side Wind Velocity (Perpendicular Flow) mph8. Measured Warm Side Wind Velocity (Parallel Flow) mph9. Measured Static Pressure Difference Across Test Specimen 0.00" ± 0.04"H2O
Average Surface Temperatures1. Metering Room Surround Panel F2. Cold Side Surround Panel F
Results
NA
9.40
1154.02
26.93
Surround Panel Conductance
12.98
12.66
27.9236.3330.99
13.37
30.95
1.
69.81-0.41
67.280.69
12.63
1211.78
71.25
Thermal Transmittance of Test Specimen (Us)
Btu/hr·ft2·F
Thermal Transmittance (U-factor)
2.96
36.45
6.000.0293
Surround Panel Thickness18.34
Page 4 of 8C5870.01-116-46
Btu/hr·ft2·F0.612. Standardized Thermal Transmittance of Test Specimen (Ust) Btu/hr·ft2·F0.56
Architectural Testing
Calculated Test Data
CTS Method1. Warm Side Emittance of Glass (e1)2. Cold Side Emittance of Glass3. Warm Side Frame Emittance*4. Cold Side Frame Emittance*5. Warm Side Sash/Panel/Vent Emittance*6. Cold Side Sash/Panel/Vent Emittance*7. Warm Side Baffle Emittance (eb1)8. Cold Side Baffle Emittance (eb2)9. Equivalent Warm Side Surface Temperature F
10. Equivalent Cold Side Surface Temperature F11. Warm Side Baffle Surface Temperature F12. Measured Warm Side Surface Conductance (hh)13. Measured Cold Side Surface Conductance (hc)14. Test Specimen Thermal Conductance (Cs)15. Convection Coefficient (Kc) Btu/(hr·ft2·F1.25)16. Radiative Test Specimen Heat Flow (Qr1) Btu/hr17. Conductive Test Specimen Heat Flow (Qc1) Btu/hr18. Radiative Heat Flux of Test Specimen (qr1)19. Convective Heat Flux of Test Specimen (qc1)20. Standardized Warm Side Surface Conductance (hsth)21. Standardized Cold Side Surface Conductance (hstc)22. Standardized Thermal Transmittance (Ust)
Test Duration1.2.
*Stated per NFRC 101
N/A
1.28
573.95
0.92
The thermal performance test results were derived from 03:55 hours, 03/19/13 to 07:55hours, 03/19/13.
21.54
5.53Btu/hr·ft2·F
40.747.34
The test parameters were considered stable for two consecutive four hour test periodsfrom 23:55 hours, 03/18/13 to 07:55 hours, 03/19/13.
0.56
The environmental systems were started at 18:30 hours, 03/18/13.
Btu/hr·ft2·FBtu/hr·ft2·F
5.28
Btu/hr·ft2·F
21.321.21 Btu/hr·ft2·F
70.12
580.07
0.800.80
1.47
Btu/hr·ft2·F
The reported Standardized Thermal Transmittance (Ust) was determined using CTS Method,per Section 8.2(A) of NFRC 102.
3.
Btu/hr·ft2·F
Btu/hr·ft2·F
0.84
C5870.01-116-46
0.84
Thermal Transmittance (U-factor)
Page 5 of 8
0.800.80
0.32
Architectural Testing
Glass collapse determined using a digital glass and air space meter
ANSI/NCSL Z540-2-1997 type B uncertainty for this test was 1.53%.
The test sample was installed in a vertical orientation, the exterior of the specimen was exposedto the cold side. The direction of heat transfer was from the interior (warm side) to the exterior(cold side) of the specimen. The ratings were rounded in accordance to NFRC 601, NFRC Unitand Measurement Policy. The data acquisition frequency is 5 minutes.
“This test method does not include procedures to determine the heat flow due to either airmovement through the specimen or solar radiation effects. As a consequence, the thermaltransmittance results obtained do not reflect performances which are expected from fieldinstallations due to not accounting for solar radiation, air leakage effects, and the thermal bridgeeffects that have the potential to occur due to the specific design and construction of thefenestration system opening. The latter can only be determined by in-situ measurements.Therefore, it is important to recognize that the thermal transmittance results obtained from thistest method are for ideal laboratory conditions and should only be used for fenestration productcomparisons and as input to thermal performance analyses which also include solar, air leakageand thermal bridge effects.”
0.50"
Page 6 of 8
Glazing Deflection:
C5870.01-116-46
Panel
Center gap width at laboratory ambientconditions on day of testing
The sample was inspected for the formation of frost or condensation, which may influence thesurface temperature measurements. The sample showed no evidence of condensation/frost atthe conclusion of the test.
Estimated center gap width upon receipt ofspecimen in laboratory (after stabilization)
Edge Gap Width 0.53"
0.50"
0.44"Center gap width at test conditions
Required annual calibrations for the Architectural Testing Inc. 'thermal test chamber' (ICN000001) in York, Pennsylvania were last conducted in May 2012 in accordance withArchitectural Testing Inc. calibration procedure. A CTS Calibration verification was performedJune 2012. A Metering Box Wall Transducer and Surround Panel Flanking LossCharacterization was performed December 2012.
Architectural Testing
For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, INC.
Tested By: Reviewed By:
Ryan P. Moser Shon W. EinsigTechnician Senior Technician
Individual-In-Responsible-Charge
RPM:amgC5870.01-116-46
Attachments (pages): This report is complete only when all attachments listed are included.
Drawings (32)Baffle Wiring Diagram (1)
C5870.01-116-46
"Ratings included in this report are for submittal to an NFRC licensed IA for certificationpurposes and are not meant to be used for labeling purposes. Only those values identified on avalid Certification Authorization Report (CAR) are to be used for labeling purposes."
Page 7 of 8
Architectural Testing, Inc. will service this report for the entire test record retention period. Testrecords that are retained such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of testspecimens, or other pertinent project documentation will be retained by Architectural Testing,Inc. for the entire test record retention period. The test record retention end date for this reportis March 19, 2017.
Appendix-A: Appendix-B:
Architectural Testing, Inc. is accredited by the International Accreditation Service (IAS) under thespecific test methods listed under lab code TL-144, in accordance with the recognizedInternational Standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005. The laboratory’s accreditation or test report in noway constitutes or implies product certification, approval, or endorsement by IAS.
CTS Calibration Data (1)
This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement bythis laboratory. It is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and relates only to thespecimen tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the writtenapproval of Architectural Testing, Inc.
Appendix-D: Appendix-C:
Surround Panel Wiring Diagram (1)
Architectural Testing
Date
Rev. #
C5870.01-116-46Page 8 of 8
Revision(s)
Revision Log
Page(s)
.01R0 11/08/13 Original Report Issue. Work requested byPiet Visser of Tubelite, Inc.
All
This report produced from controlled document template ATI 00025(a), revised 11/12/2012.
Architectural Testing
CTS Test DateCTS Size ft2
CTS Glass/Core ConductanceWarm Side Air Temperature FCold Side Air Temperature FWarm Side Average Surface Temperature FCold Side Average Surface Temperature FConvection Coefficient (Kc)Measured Cold Side Surface Conductance (hc)Measured Thermal Transmittance
4.
1.2. 21.53
06/13/12
69.803. 0.40
C5870.01-116-46Appendix A: CTS Calibration Data
Btu/hr·ft2·F
7.Btu/(hr·ft2·F1.25)8. 0.32
5. -0.396. 54.61
Btu/hr·ft2·F
3.32
9. 5.5310. 0.30 Btu/hr·ft2·F
+1 +2 +3
+4 +5
+6 +7 +8
C5870.01-116-46Appendix B: Surround Panel Wiring Diagram
+1 +2 +3
+4 +5 +6
+7 +8 +9
+10 +11 +12
+13 +14 +15
C5870.01-116-46Appendix C: Baffle Wiring Diagram
C5870.01-116-46Appendix D: Drawings