Application of Different Tracers to - EPA Archives · 2015-09-18 · Hydrogeology Group Application...
Transcript of Application of Different Tracers to - EPA Archives · 2015-09-18 · Hydrogeology Group Application...
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Application of Different Tracers to Application of Different Tracers to Evaluate the Flow Regime at Riverbank Evaluate the Flow Regime at Riverbank
Filtration Sites in Berlin (Germany)Filtration Sites in Berlin (Germany)
G. Massmann, D. Richter, J. Rümmler & A. PekdegerFree University of Berlin
A. KnappeAlfred Wegener Institute Potsdam
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
•• IntroductionIntroduction
-- NasriNasri
-- Berlin situationBerlin situation
•• Methods/Tracer Methods/Tracer
•• ResultsResults
-- Surface waterSurface water
-- Bank filtrateBank filtrate
-- MicrocystinMicrocystin Experiments (Experiments (Gesche GrützmacherGesche Grützmacher, UBA Berlin), UBA Berlin)
•• Summary/ConclusionsSummary/Conclusions
IntroductionIntroductionTalk Talk outlineoutline
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Research program in Berlin to study the fate ofpathogens and organics, geochemical processes and
hydraulics in bankfiltration and artificial rechargesystems at laboratory, semi-technical and field scale.
atural and
rtificial
ystems for
echarge and
nfiltration
May 2002 – May 2005
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
IntroductionIntroductionNasriNasri: 7 Teams: 7 Teams
Algae: Retention and elimination of cyanobacterial toxins (microcystins) (Dr. Chorus/Dr. Bartel, German Environmental Acency).
Bacteria: Using bacteriophages, indicator bacteria and viral pathogens for assessing the health risk (Dr. Lopez-Pila, Dr. Szewzyk, GermanEnvironmental Acency).
Drugs: Occurrence and fate of drug residues and related polar contaminants (Dr. Heberer, Technical University, Dr. Dünnbier, Berlin Water Company).
Hydrogeo: Hydrogeological-hydrogeochemical processes using a multi tracer approach (Prof. Pekdeger, Free University)
Models: Integrated modelling concepts: coupled groundwater transport andbiochemical reactions (Prof. Nuetzmann,Institute for Freshwater Ecology)
Organics: Organic substances– process studies (Prof. Jekel, Technical University)
BWB: Data management, water sampling, analyses
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
IntroductionIntroductionObjectives of Objectives of NasriNasri
• To ensure the long term sustainability of the groundwater resource and drinking water quality through the bankfiltration and the groundwater recharge process
• To expand the Know-How and quantify the relevant processes• To obtain quantitative and qualitative guidelines for proper design and
optimised operation of existing sites and for transfer of the integrated knowledge to other locations (use of models etc..)
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
IntroductionIntroductionBerlin characteristicsBerlin characteristics
• ~ 3.4 million inhabitants
• semi-closed water cycle
• drinking water derived from Berlin groundwater
• ~ 70 % originates from bank filtration
• production well galleries adjacent to surface water system
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
IntroductionIntroductionFactors influencing the raw water quality Factors influencing the raw water quality
Temporal and spatial variation of surface water quality
presence, permeability & thickness of clogging layer
Lithology, permeability and geochemistry of aquifer sediments
Quality of background Groundwater(inland and deeper aquifers)
Well design(location, length & depth of filter screens)
Processes occurring during infiltration
Hydraulic regime (mainly a result of pumping performances)
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
to use a variety of tracers at several fieldto use a variety of tracers at several field--sites in order sites in order to:to:
•• estimate the proportion of treated wastewater in the estimate the proportion of treated wastewater in the surface water systemsurface water system
•• estimate the proportion of bankestimate the proportion of bank--filtrate (and likewise filtrate (and likewise deeper and landside groundwater) in the production deeper and landside groundwater) in the production wells wells
•• derive travel times from the surface water to the derive travel times from the surface water to the production wells production wells
•• understand flow regimeunderstand flow regime
ObjectivesObjectivesObjectivesObjectives
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000year
10
100
1000
10000
Triti
um c
once
ntra
tion
in T
U
Ottawa annual meanValentia annual meanHof annual meanHof winter meanHof summer meanBerlin annual meanOder annual mean
Tritium in precipitation
data: IAEA, BfG
MethodsMethodsT/He ageT/He age dating dating
in water: 1TU 1T / 1018 H 0.118Bq/kgTH3oder He312.32y
DataData: IAEA, BfG: IAEA, BfG
t1/2 = 12.32y
τ = / ln 2t1/2 . ln (1 + / T
3He* )Groundwater „age“:
³He* = tritiogenic He
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
MethodsMethodsOverview on applicable tracers in BerlinOverview on applicable tracers in BerlinTracer:Tracer: Origin:Origin: Useful for the interpretation of:Useful for the interpretation of: Difficulties:Difficulties:
δD, δ18O surface water with seasonal variations
water movement none, conservative tracer
Temperature surface water with seasonal variations
water movement retarding
Cl- surface water with seasonal variations
water movement only if influence of saline groundwater can be excluded
Cl-, Na+, B saline deeper groundwater proportion of deeper saline groundwater
may vary strongly locally
SO42- dissolution of gypsum derived
from building rubble in the shallow aquifer
proportion of shallow “native”groundwater
may vary strongly locally
B surface water, effluent water movement, proportion of bank filtrate in raw water
only if influence of saline groundwater can be excluded
Gd surface water, effluent water movement, proportion of bank filtrate in raw water
possibly degradable
EDTA surface water, effluent water movement, proportion of bank filtrate in raw water
sometimes the background groundwater has also got very high concentrations
Sr surface water, very few seasonal variations
proportion of bank filtrate in raw water
not always applicable
T/He Surface water, through atmospheric input
groundwater “age” minimum age required is 2 months
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Mixing calculationMixing calculation
X = [Cw-CGW)/(CSW-CGW)]*100 [%]
X = Percentage of bank-filtrate in the production well
Cw= Tracer concentration in the production well
CSW= Tracer concentration in the surface water
Cgw= Tracer concentration in the groundwater
MethodsMethods
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
ResultsResultsSurface waterSurface waterSpatial variations of B and percentage of treated wastewater in the surface water
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Depending on location in space & time, the proportion of treated wastewater in the surface water can be high.
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
ResultsResultsLocation of field sitesLocation of field sites
Transect Lake Tegel
Transect GWA Tegel
Transect Lake Wannsee 1 & 2
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
ResultsResultsSurface waterSurface waterPercentage of treated wastewater in Lake Tegel near the transect
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Mai 01
Jun 0
1Ju
l 01
Aug 01
Sep 01
Okt 01
Nov 01
Dez 01
Jan 0
2Feb
02Mrz
02Apr
02Mai
02Ju
n 02
Jul 0
2Aug
02Sep
02Okt
02Nov
02Dez
02
month
% tr
eate
d w
aste
wat
er
Cl
B
Surface water pumping Surface water pumping device starts operationdevice starts operation
Since operation of pumping device started, the proportion of treated wastewater in SW near transect declined to an average of 12 %
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
FieldField--site Lakesite Lake WannseeWannsee ResultsResults
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
139
136 135 135
27
135
3.6
23.5
2.7
418*133*
SO42- [mg/l]
7.6
7.9 6.9 7.5
< 1
6.8
< 1
1.3
< 1
< 2*7.7*
EDTA [µg/l]66.7
66.3 67.1 67.4
373
66.2
54.3
143
19.8
25.0*64.5*
Cl [mg/l]
Transect LakeTransect Lake WannseeWannsee 1, 1, hydrochemistry ResultsResults
DataData: : IlatIlat averageaverage 10/2000 10/2000 ––11/200111/2001*BWB 01/2003*BWB 01/2003
DataData: : IlatIlat averageaverage 10/2000 10/2000 ––11/200111/2001*BWB 01/2003 *BWB 01/2003 –– 04/200304/2003
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
4Heterr [Nml kg-1]
7.07E-5
3.97E-5
0
2.84E-4
00
1.63E-4
T [TU]
0.02
0.02
11.12
0.03
10.7511.15
2.41
~Age [years]
65
100
0
100
00
26
Transect LakeTransect Lake WannseeWannsee 1, 1, age dating ResultsResults
Data: Helis Laboratory, University of Bremen
~Age [years]
> 50
> 50
0-0.5
>> 50
0-0.50-0.5
mixed
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Transect LakeTransect Lake WannseeWannsee 1, 1, dD versus d18O ResultsResults
lake Wannsee & most obs. wells
deeper aquifers
well 4
well 3
well 3 (new transect) has a much higher proportion of bank-filtrate!
well 5
Data: Alfred-Wegener Institute Potsdam
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
FieldField--site Lakesite Lake WannseeWannseeTime-series of EDTA in production wells
ResultsResults
Proportion of bank-filtrate calc. with EDTA:Well3 = 61-97 %Well4 = 10-47 %Well5 = 88-96 %
Data: Berlin Water Company
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Transect LakeTransect Lake WannseeWannsee 11Time-series of d18O in shallow observation wells
ResultsResults
o o o
Travel time Lake-well4 1-2 months in shallow aquifer
Data: Alfred-Wegener Institute Potsdam
All production wells show no seasonal variation
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
#S
##
#
##
#
##
##
##
## #
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
# #
#
###
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
TegelortNord
TegelortSüd
Saatwinkel
GalerieWest
GalerieOst
WW Tegel
Hohenzollern-kanal
Baumwerder
Scharfenberg
HASSELWERDER
LINDWERDERGÄNSEWERDER
N4583000
4583000
4584000
4584000
4585000
4585000
4586000
4586000
4587000
4587000
4588000
4588000
4589000
4589000
4590000
4590000
5825
000 5825000
5826
000 5826000
5827
000 5827000
5828
000 5828000
5829
000 5829000
5830
000 5830000
model regiontransect Tegel
#
TegelortSüd
well
name of well gallery
Legend
# ## well gallery
Kartengrund: TK 50 Blatt L3544Berlin-Spandau, 1998Koordinaten: Gauß-KrügerPotsdam-Datum (Zentralpunkt Rauenberg)BesselellipsoidErstellungsdatum: 12/2002Bearbeiter: Jeannette Rümmler
0 2000 4000 Meter
Flow model LakeFlow model Lake TegelTegel ResultsResults
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
3311
TEG371O
PTEG37
1UP
3307
3302
3303 3304
3310
3309
3308
3301
TEG372
3306
3305
m belowground
m abovesea-level
W E
Lithologyrocks
gravel
coarse sand
medium sand
fine sand
silt
clay
glacial till
0 10 20 30 40 m
brown coal
3311 3310
330933083301neu TEG371OPTEG371UP
3307neu3302 TEG372 33063303
0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.08.09.010.011.012.013.014.015.016.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.0
34.033.032.031.030.029.028.027.026.025.024.023.022.021.020.019.018.017.016.015.014.013.012.011.010.09.08.07.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.0-1.0-2.0-3.0-4.0-5.0-6.0
33053304neu
Transect LakeTransect Lake TegelTegel ResultsResults
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Flow model LakeFlow model Lake TegelTegel ResultsResults
Shortest travel timebetween single wells and
position shoreline*in weeks/days
*Flow field after 190 days
Bearbeiter: J. Rümmler, 7/2003
0 200 Meter
Well 10
Well 16
N
well 10 = 31/217well 11 = 32/224well 12 = 29/203well 13 = 26/182well 14 = 34/238well 15 = 32/224well
16 = 28/196
Well
Leakage aquifer 1Leakage lake sedimentBoulder clay above aquifer 2
steady state model
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
ResultsResults
0 100 Meter
Well 16
Well 10
Br 10 = 23
Br 13 = -
Br 15 = 32
Br 11 = 29/30Br 12 = 29
Br 14 = 30/31
Br 16 = 22/23
N
Schaltung und Fördermenge Szene 1 bis 3
0,0092
0,00925
0,0093
0,00935
0,0094
0,00945
0,0095
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
StressperiodenFö
rder
men
gein
m³/s
Br 10 Br 11 Br 12 Br 13 Br 14 Br 15 Br 16
Bearbeiter: J. Rümmler, 7/2003
Intervall < < = 1 WeekWell
Leakage aquifer 1Leakage lake sediment
Boulder clay above aquifer 2
Shortest travel timebetween single wells and
position shoreline in weeks
Scenario 3
Well operation and pumping rate scenario 3
Pum
ping
rate
in m
³/sStress period
Pumping regime is very complicated –Flow models help to understand the influence of different pumping scenarios on groundwater flow paths!
Flow model LakeFlow model Lake TegelTegel
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
xx xxxx
xx
LakeLake TegelTegel, age dating and hydrochemistry, age dating and hydrochemistry ResultsResults
Lake to 3301: 2 - 3 months
Lake to 3303: 3 - 4 months
Production well water shows no seasonal variationTravel time Lake-well 13: 6-9 months (Fritz 2002)
Data: Alfred-Wegener Institute Potsdam
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
-8 -7 -6 -5δ18Ο [ vs SMOW]
-64
-62
-60
-58
-56
-54
-52
-50
-48
-46
δD [
vs.
SM
OW
]
3301-3302-3303below lake, 3310, 3311 inland, 3305lake Tegelmedium depth, TEG371-372 production wells 12-14 shallow, 3306-3309
‰
‰
obs. wells inland
production wells
Transect LakeTransect Lake TegelTegel, , dD versus d18O
lake tegel, shallow & deep obs. wells
Production well water is a mixture of background groundwater and bank-filtrateProportion of bank-filtrate: ~ 80 %
Data: Alfred-Wegener Institute Potsdam
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
LakeLake TegelTegel, , age datingage dating ResultsResults
~Age [years]
12.7
11.94.3
0-0.6
1.7
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
LakeLake TegelTegel, , age datingage dating ResultsResults
Specific water constituents confirm that production wells may contain a considerable amount of older bank-filtrate!
production wells
groundwater
surface water (at present)
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6amdoph [µg/l]
10
20
30
ED
TA [
g/l]
lake Tegelobs. wells, TS Tegelinland TS Tegel, 3304, 3305prod. wells 13, 14, 15
< 2
Data: Berlin Water Company
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Summary & ConclusionsSummary & Conclusions•• Combining a number of tracer may help to understand the hydrogeoCombining a number of tracer may help to understand the hydrogeology and logy and
hydraulics at a very complex bankhydraulics at a very complex bank--filtration system in Berlin.filtration system in Berlin.
•• With the help of T/He, ages of groundwater from different aquifeWith the help of T/He, ages of groundwater from different aquifers can be estimated.rs can be estimated.
•• Combining discharge measurements with the concentrations of wastCombining discharge measurements with the concentrations of wastewater indicators, ewater indicators, proportions of wastewater in the surface water can be calculatedproportions of wastewater in the surface water can be calculated. (. (WannseeWannsee: : ∅∅ 8.5 % in 8.5 % in winter, 20.1 % in summer; Lakewinter, 20.1 % in summer; Lake TegelTegel ∅∅ 12 % near respective transects).12 % near respective transects).
•• With tracers showing strong seasonal variations in the surface wWith tracers showing strong seasonal variations in the surface water, travel times can be ater, travel times can be estimated (Lake to wells:estimated (Lake to wells: WannseeWannsee: 1: 1--2 months,2 months, TegelTegel: 5: 5--8 months).8 months).
•• Relatively Relatively ““youngyoung”” water constituents like EDTA are only present in the bankwater constituents like EDTA are only present in the bank--filtrate filtrate and can be used to calculate proportions of bankand can be used to calculate proportions of bank--filtrate in the wells at Lakefiltrate in the wells at Lake WannseeWannsee. . Large differences exist in the different wells (~ 10 % BF in welLarge differences exist in the different wells (~ 10 % BF in well 4, ~ 90 % BF in well 5).l 4, ~ 90 % BF in well 5).
•• At LakeAt Lake TegelTegel, proportions of bank, proportions of bank--filtrate in the wells are generally high (~ 80 % in filtrate in the wells are generally high (~ 80 % in average).average).
•• Age dating, lack of seasonal variations in the wells as well as Age dating, lack of seasonal variations in the wells as well as substances formerly substances formerly present in the surface water in higher concentrations (e.g. present in the surface water in higher concentrations (e.g. amdophamdoph) indicate that a ) indicate that a proportion of the bankproportion of the bank--filtrate is much older that predicated from observation wells.filtrate is much older that predicated from observation wells.
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroupUBA`s Experimental Field in Berlin
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Slow Sand Filter Experiments
50 to 8 µg/L MC
1 cm/h
live cyanobacteria (Planktothrix agardhii)
samples of water body
samples of effluent
samplesfrom 10 cmdepth
Results Results GrützmacherGrützmacher et al.et al.
Free University of Berlin Hydrogeology Hydrogeology GroupGroup
Cellbound / Extracellular Cyanotoxins (Microcystins)
Cells can act as long-term source for microcystins
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
50 55 60 65 70 75 80days aber beginning of experiment
biovolume in water body
total MC in water body
total MC 10 cm below filtersurface
end of dosingof cyanobacteria
Results Results Grützmacher Grützmacher et al.et al.