Annuities in Poland Current state of discussions Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak Ministry of Labour and...
-
Upload
angel-baldwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Annuities in Poland Current state of discussions Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak Ministry of Labour and...
Annuities in PolandCurrent state of discussions
Agnieszka Chłoń-DomińczakMinistry of Labour and Social Policy
Tallin, October 12, 2006
Outline of the presentation
The pension system in Poland
Prospects of future annuity market
Principles of annuity payments
Possible organisational structure
Mandatory Social Security System
New system architecture
NDC
PAYGmandatory,administered by thepublic institution,individual accounts
First Tier
Open Pension Funds
Fundedmandatory,administered by privateinstitutions,individual accounts
Second Tier
Savings and additional insurance
Fundedvoluntary,administered privately,individual accounts
Third Tier
7 Years of the System
21 funds started their activity in 19994 biggest funds attracted 65% of clientsTotal number of enrolments in 1999 – around 10 millionTwo age groups:• Born in 1969 and later – second pillar mandatory• Born between 1949 and 1968 – second pillar
voluntary
About 64% of voluntary age group 30-50 joined the new system in 1999
Market overviewPresently 15 funds exist after M&As4 biggest funds have 72% of assets under managementTotal number of members 12.2 million Total assets under management – PLN 102 billion (around $34 b)Major amendment to the Pension Funds Act came into force in October 2003; key changes introduced in April 2004: • New terms for rate of return comparison • New principles of the ZUS lottery• Decrease of fees
Market players in numbers
Pension FundNet Assets
Aug. 31, 2006 (PLN million)
Market Share by Assets
Members Aug. 25, 2006
Commercial Union OFE 27,448 26.9% 2,592,663ING Nationale-Nederlanden OFE 23,707 23.3% 2,366,870OFE PZU „Złota Jesień" 13,907 13.6% 1,881,357AIG OFE 8,548 8.4% 1,026,739Winterthur OFE 4,064 4.0% 520,346Nordea OFE 3,714 3.6% 674,247Generali OFE 3,536 3.5% 466,367Bankowy OFE 3,206 3.1% 438,817OFE Skarbiec-Emerytura 2,720 2.7% 445,256Allianz Polska OFE 2,542 2.5% 296,251OFE Ergo Hestia 2,345 2.3% 372,402OFE Pocztylion 2,046 2.0% 361,026Pekao OFE 1,618 1.6% 242,806OFE „DOM" 1,590 1.6% 278,732OFE Polsat 919 0.9% 269,271Total: 101,910 100% 12,233,150
Source: KNUiFE
Investment performance of Open Pension Funds
AVERAGE UNIT PRICE OF THE EXISTING FUNDS
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
01/00 08/00 03/01 10/01 05/02 12/02 07/03 02/04 09/04 04/05 11/05 06/06
Future annuity market
Pension funds• 10 million participants in
the first year
• Simple investment product with stable flow of contributions
• Relatively quick break-even
• Possiblity to change provider
Annuities• Gradual flow of
participants, low numbers at the beginning
• Gradually raising flow of contributions and complex product
• Long-term outlook for higher profits
• No option to change provider
Prerequisites
Developed insurance market
Availability of annuity products
Availability of long-term bonds at least as a benchmark• inflation-indexed?
Projections of market development
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025
men women
-
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025
mln
PL
N
New pensioners Premium value
Principles of annuity payments
Life-time payments
Security
Equal status of men and women
Protection of purchasing power
Competition
Simplicity and transparency
Low costs
Immune to political interventions
Annuities - first approachSpecialised annuity companiesLicensed and supervised by Second Pillar SupervisorFees:
• lump-sum fee up to 7% of accumulated capital• additional fee in case of higher returns
Gender-specific life tablesProducts:
• single annuity• single annuity with guarantee period• joint annuity• joint annuity with guarantee period
Annuities - first approach controversies
Political issues:• Too expensive• Gender specific tables are unfair
Professional issues:• the fee system does not allow for efficient functioning • better solution: fee deducted from reserves combined
with fee deducted from benefit payments• companies should be allowed to use their own life
tables• products are not defined fully (usually no maximum
values)
Annuities - alternative optionsCompetitive solutions:• Specialised companies• Life insurance companies• Group savings institutions
Quasi-market solutions:• Tender: one winner, one cohort• Tender: multiple products, multiple winners, one cohort• Extending products of open pensin funds
Non-market solutions:• One public annuity company
Conclusions
There is no “best solution”Careful design in necessary• Economies of scale• Competition
Not only legislation, but the market must be readyWhere are we right now?• Not very far from 1999
When do we have to be ready• by 2009