Annex 10 Vol I Amdt 89 EFOD

262
Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the difference AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS Annex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89 Standard or Recommended Practice New Zealand State Legislation, Regulation or Document Reference Level of implementation of SARP's Text of the difference to be notified to ICAO Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) Report on entire Annex IXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006 No Difference Chapter 1 Reference Definition CAR Part 1. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONS N1.All references to “Radio Regulations” are to the Radio Regulations published by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Radio Regulations are amended from time to time by the decisions embodied in the Final Acts of World Radiocommunication Conferences held normally every two to three years. Further information on the ITU processes as they relate to aeronautical radio system frequency use is contained in the Handbook on Radio Frequency Spectrum Requirements for Civil Aviation including statement of approved ICAO policies (Doc 9718). N2.Annex 10, Volume I includes Standards and Recommended Practices for certain forms of equipment for air navigation aids. While the Contracting State will determine the necessity for specific installations in accordance with the conditions prescribed in the relevant Standard or Recommended Practice, review of the need for specific installation and the formulation of ICAO opinion and recommendations to Contracting States concerned is carried out periodically by Council, ordinarily on the basis of recommendations of Regional Air Navigation Meetings (Doc 8144 — Directives to Regional Air Navigation Meetings and Rules of Procedure for their Conduct) . N3.The terminology used in this Annex to refer to instrument approach operations is based on a previous version of the Annex 6 classification of instrument approach and landing operations. It can be mapped to the Annex 6 definitions as follows: When the following terms are used in this volume, they have the following meanings: 10/1/2014 Page 1 of 262

TAGS:

description

caan

Transcript of Annex 10 Vol I Amdt 89 EFOD

Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 1.INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONSN1.AllreferencestoRadioRegulationsaretothe RadioRegulationspublishedbytheInternational TelecommunicationUnion(ITU).RadioRegulationsare amendedfromtimetotimebythedecisionsembodiedinthe FinalActsofWorldRadiocommunicationConferencesheld normallyeverytwotothreeyears.Furtherinformationon theITUprocessesastheyrelatetoaeronauticalradiosystem frequencyuseiscontainedintheHandbookonRadio FrequencySpectrumRequirementsforCivilAviation including statement of approved ICAO policies (Doc 9718).N2.Annex10,VolumeIincludesStandardsand RecommendedPracticesforcertainformsofequipmentfor airnavigationaids.WhiletheContractingStatewill determinethenecessityforspecificinstallationsin accordancewiththeconditionsprescribedintherelevant StandardorRecommendedPractice,reviewoftheneedfor specificinstallationandtheformulationofICAOopinion andrecommendationstoContractingStatesconcernedis carriedoutperiodicallybyCouncil,ordinarilyonthebasis ofrecommendationsofRegionalAirNavigationMeetings (Doc8144 DirectivestoRegionalAirNavigationMeetings and Rules of Procedure for their Conduct).N3.TheterminologyusedinthisAnnextoreferto instrumentapproachoperationsisbasedonaprevious versionoftheAnnex6 classificationofinstrumentapproach andlandingoperations.ItcanbemappedtotheAnnex6 definitions as follows:When the following terms are used in this volume, they have the following meanings:10/1/2014 Page 1 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Altitude.Theverticaldistanceofalevel,apointoranobject consideredasapoint,measuredfrommeansealevel (MSL).No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 1. Areanavigation(RNAV).Amethodofnavigationwhich permitsaircraftoperationonanydesiredflightpath withinthecoverageofground-orspace-based navigationaidsorwithinthelimitsofthecapabilityof self-contained aids, or a combination of these.Note.Areanavigationincludesperformance-based navigationaswellasotheroperationsthatdonotmeetthe definition of performance-based navigation.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionNote: any definition not otherwise referenced is deemed to be incorporated by reference (IBR) in CAR 171.53(a)(1).CAR 171.53(a)(1). Effectiveacceptancebandwidth.Therangeoffrequencies withrespecttotheassignedfrequencyforwhich receptionisassuredwhenallreceivertoleranceshave been taken into account.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionIBR. CAR 171.53(a)(1)(ii). Effectiveadjacentchannelrejection.Therejectionthatis obtainedattheappropriateadjacentchannelfrequency whenallrelevantreceivertoleranceshavebeentakeninto account.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 1. Elevation.Theverticaldistanceofapointoralevel,onor affixedtothesurfaceoftheearth,measuredfrommean sea level.10/1/2014 Page 2 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionIBR. CAR 171.53(a)(1)(ii). Essentialradionavigationservice.Aradionavigation servicewhosedisruptionhasasignificantimpacton operations in the affected airspace or aerodrome.Not ApplicableChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionFanmarkerbeacon.Atypeofradiobeacon,theemissionsof which radiate in a vertical fan-shaped pattern.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 1. Height.Theverticaldistanceofalevel,apointoranobject considered as a point, measured from a specified datum.Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionCommon usage term. CARs. Not specifically defined. HumanFactorsprinciples.Principleswhichapplytodesign, certification,training,operationsandmaintenanceand whichseeksafeinterfacebetweenthehumanandother systemcomponentsbyproperconsiderationtohuman performance.10/1/2014 Page 3 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionIBR. CAR 171.53(a)(1)(ii). Meanpower(ofaradiotransmitter).Theaveragepower suppliedtotheantennatransmissionlinebyatransmitter duringanintervaloftimesufficientlylongcomparedwith thelowestfrequencyencounteredinthemodulation taken under normal operating conditions.Note.Atimeof1/10 secondduringwhichthemean power is greatest will be selected normally.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionAvailable on CAANZ web site http://www.caa.govt.nz/PBN/PBN_Defs_and_Abbrev.pdf.New Zealand PBN Implementation Plan.Navigationspecification.Asetofaircraftandflightcrew requirementsneededtosupportperformance-based navigationoperationswithinadefinedairspace.There are two kinds of navigation specification:RequirednavigationPerformance(RNP)specification. Anavigationspecificationbasedonareanavigation thatincludestherequirementforperformance monitoringandalerting,designatedbytheprefix RNP, e.g. RNP 4, RNP APCH.Areanavigation(RNAV)specification.Anavigation specificationbasedonareanavigationthatdoesnot includetherequirementforperformancemonitoring andalerting,designatedbytheprefixRNAV,e.g. RNAV 5, RNAV 1.N1.ThePerformance-basedNavigation(PBN)Manual (Doc9613),VolumeII,containsdetailedguidanceon navigation specifications.N2.ThetermRNP,previouslydefinedasastatementof thenavigationperformancenecessaryforoperationwithina definedairspace,hasbeenremovedfromthisAnnexasthe conceptofRNPhasbeenovertakenbytheconceptofPBN. ThetermRNPinthisAnnexisnowsolelyusedinthecontext ofnavigationspecificationsthatrequireperformance monitoringandalerting,e.g.RNP4 referstotheaircraftand operatingrequirements,includinga4 NMlateral performancewithon-boardperformancemonitoringand alerting that are detailed in Doc 9613.10/1/2014 Page 4 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionAvailable on CAANZ web site http://www.caa.govt.nz/PBN/PBN_Defs_and_Abbrev.pdf.New Zealand PBN Implementation Plan.Performance-basednavigation(PBN).Areanavigation basedonperformancerequirementsforaircraftoperating alonganATSroute,onaninstrumentapproach procedure or in a designated airspace.Note.Performancerequirementsareexpressedin navigationspecifications(RNAVspecification,RNP specification)intermsofaccuracy,integrity,continuity, availabilityandfunctionalityneededfortheproposed operation in the context of a particular airspace concept.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 1. Pressure-altitude.Anatmosphericpressureexpressedin termsofaltitudewhichcorrespondstothatpressurein the Standard Atmosphere.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionIBR. CAR 171.53(a)(1)(ii). Protectedservicevolume.Apartofthefacilitycoverage wherethefacilityprovidesaparticularservicein accordancewithrelevantSARPsandwithinwhichthe facility is afforded frequency protection.No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionSee under "Aeronautical telecommunication service".CAR Part 1. Radionavigationservice.Aserviceprovidingguidance informationorpositiondatafortheefficientandsafe operationofaircraftsupportedbyoneormoreradio navigation aids.10/1/2014 Page 5 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionAirways Corporation of New Zealand (ACNZ) Manual of Air Traffic Services (MATS), RAC 1.Touchdown.Thepointwherethenominalglidepath intercepts the runway.Note.Touchdownasdefinedaboveisonlyadatum andisnotnecessarilytheactualpointatwhichtheaircraft will touch the runway.Not ApplicableChapter 1ReferenceDefinitionZmarkerbeacon.Atypeofradiobeacon,theemissionsof which radiate in a vertical cone-shaped pattern.10/1/2014 Page 6 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 2ReferenceStandardNote: New Zealand does not use MLS or VHF marker beacons.AIPNZ GEN 3.7.2.1.1 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS2.1 Standard radio navigation aidsThe standard radio navigation aids shall be:a) theinstrumentlandingsystem(ILS)conformingto the Standards contained in Chapter 3, 3.1;b) themicrowavelandingsystem(MLS)conformingto the Standards contained in Chapter 3, 3.11;c) theglobalnavigationsatellitesystem(GNSS) conformingtotheStandardscontainedinChapter3, 3.7.d) theVHFomnidirectionalradiorange(VOR) conformingtotheStandardscontainedinChapter3, 3.3;e) thenon-directionalradiobeacon(NDB)conforming to the Standards contained in Chapter 3, 3.4;f) thedistancemeasuringequipment(DME) conformingtotheStandardscontainedinChapter3, 3.5; andg) theen-routeVHFmarkerbeaconconformingtothe Standards contained in Chapter 3, 3.6.N1.Sincevisualreferenceisessentialforthefinalstages ofapproachandlanding,theinstallationofaradio navigationaiddoesnotobviatetheneedforvisualaidsto approach and landing in conditions of low visibility.N2.Itisintendedthatintroductionandapplicationof radionavigationaidstosupportprecisionapproachand landingoperationswillbeinaccordancewiththestrategy shown in Attachment B.N3.Categoriesofprecisionapproachandlanding operations are classified in Annex 6, Part I, Chapter 1.N4.Informationonoperationalobjectivesassociated 10/1/2014 Page 7 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006withILSfacilityperformancecategoriesisgivenin Attachment C, 2.1 and 2.14.N5.Informationonoperationalobjectivesassociated with MLS facility performance is given in Attachment G, 11.No DifferenceChapter 2ReferenceStandardAIP NZ GEN 3.7.2.1.2Differencesinradionavigationaidsinanyrespectfromthe StandardsofChapter3 shallbepublishedinanAeronautical Information Publication (AIP).Not ApplicableChapter 2ReferenceStandard2.1.3Whereverthereisinstalledaradionavigationaidthatis neitheranILSnoranMLS,butwhichmaybeusedinwholeor inpartwithaircraftequipmentdesignedforusewiththeILS orMLS,fulldetailsofpartsthatmaybesousedshallbe published in an Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP).Note.Thisprovisionistoestablisharequirementfor promulgationofrelevantinformationratherthanto authorize such installations.Not ApplicableChapter 2ReferenceStandard2.1.4.12.1.4 GNSS-specific provisionsItshallbepermissibletoterminateaGNSSsatelliteservice providedbyoneofitselements(Chapter3,3.7.2)onthebasis of at least a six-year advance notice by a service provider.10/1/2014 Page 8 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 2ReferenceRecommendationMay be part of PBN rules development (TBA).CAR Part 19 Subpart D. Not specifically prescribed.2.1.4.2Recommendation.AStatethatapprovesGNSS-based operationsshouldensurethatGNSSdatarelevanttothose operations are recorded.N1.Theserecordeddataareprimarilyintendedforuse inaccidentandincidentinvestigations.Theymayalso supportperiodicconfirmationthataccuracy,integrity, continuityandavailabilityaremaintainedwithinthelimits required for the operations approved.N2.GuidancematerialontherecordingofGNSS parameters is contained in Attachment D, 11.Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 2ReferenceRecommendationMay be part of PBN rules development (TBA).CAR Part 19 Subpart D. Not specifically prescribed.2.1.4.3Recommendation.Recordingsshouldberetainedfora periodofatleast14 days.Whentherecordingsarepertinent toaccidentandincidentinvestigations,theyshouldbe retainedforlongerperiodsuntilitisevidentthattheywill no longer be required.10/1/2014 Page 9 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Not ApplicableChapter 2ReferenceStandardNZ does not use PAR.2.1.5.12.1.5 Precision approach radarAprecisionapproachradar(PAR)system,whereinstalledand operatedasaradionavigationaidtogetherwithequipmentfor two-waycommunicationwithaircraftandfacilitiesforthe efficientcoordinationoftheseelementswithairtrafficcontrol, shall conform to the Standards contained in Chapter 3, 3.2.N1.Theprecisionapproachradar(PAR)elementofthe precisionapproachradarsystemmaybeinstalledand operatedwithoutthesurveillanceradarelement(SRE), whenitisdeterminedthattheSREisnotnecessarytomeet therequirementsofairtrafficcontrolforthehandlingof aircraft.N2.AlthoughSREisnotconsidered,inany circumstances,asatisfactoryalternativetotheprecision approachradarsystem,theSREmaybeinstalledand operatedwithoutthePARfortheassistanceofairtraffic controlinhandlingaircraftintendingtousearadio navigationaid,orforsurveillanceradarapproachesand departures.No DifferenceChapter 2ReferenceRecommendationAIPNZ.2.1.6Recommendation.Whenaradionavigationaidis providedtosupportprecisionapproachandlanding,it shouldbesupplemented,asnecessary,byasourceor sourcesofguidanceinformationwhich,whenusedin conjunctionwithappropriateprocedures,willprovide effectiveguidanceto,andefficientcoupling(manualor automatic) with, the desired reference path.Note.DME,GNSS,NDB,VORandaircraftnavigation systems have been used for such purposes.10/1/2014 Page 10 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 2ReferenceStandardStand-alone NDBs are flight tested only as required for special or post-accident-incident inspection.CAR 171.59. Some NDBs are not subject to priodic flight testing.2.2.12.2 Ground and flight testingRadionavigationaidsofthetypescoveredbythe specificationsinChapter3 andavailableforusebyaircraft engagedininternationalairnavigationshallbethesubjectof periodic ground and flight tests.Note.Guidanceonthegroundandflighttestingof ICAOstandardfacilities,includingtheperiodicityofthe testing,iscontainedinAttachmentCandintheManualon Testing of Radio Navigation Aids (Doc 8071).No DifferenceChapter 2ReferenceStandardCAR 171.19.2.3.12.3 Provision of information on the operational status of radio navigation servicesAerodromecontroltowersandunitsprovidingapproach controlserviceshallbeprovidedwithinformationonthe operationalstatusofradionavigationservicesessentialfor approach,landingandtake-offattheaerodrome(s)withwhich theyareconcerned,onatimelybasisconsistentwiththeuse of the service(s) involved.No DifferenceChapter 2ReferenceStandardCAR 171.53(a)(3).2.4.12.4 Power supply for radio navigation aids and communication systemsRadionavigationaidsandgroundelementsofcommunication systemsofthetypesspecifiedinAnnex10 shallbeprovided withsuitablepowersuppliesandmeanstoensurecontinuity of service consistent with the use of the service(s) involved.Note.Guidancematerialonpowersupplyswitch-over is contained in Attachment C.10/1/2014 Page 11 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Not ApplicableChapter 2ReferenceRecommendation2.5.12.5 Human Factors considerationsRecommendation.HumanFactorsprinciplesshouldbe observedinthedesignandcertificationofradionavigation aids.Note.GuidancematerialonHumanFactors principlescanbefoundintheHumanFactorsTraining Manual(Doc9683)andCircular249 (HumanFactorsDigest No. 11 Human Factors in CNS/ATM Systems).___________________No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionThe applicable standards of this Chapter are incorporated by reference in Part 171.CAR Part 171.CHAPTER 3. SPECIFICATIONS FOR RADIO NAVIGATION AIDSNote.Specificationconcerningthesitingand constructionofequipmentandinstallationsonoperational areasaimedatreducingthehazardtoaircrafttoaminimum are contained in Annex 14, Chapter 8.3.1 Specification for ILS3.1.1 DefinitionsAngulardisplacementsensitivity.Theratioofmeasured DDMtothecorrespondingangulardisplacementfrom the appropriate reference line.10/1/2014 Page 12 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Backcoursesector.Thecoursesectorwhichissituatedon the opposite side of the localizer from the runway.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Courseline.Thelocusofpointsnearesttotherunwaycentre line in any horizontal plane at which the DDM is zero.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Coursesector.Asectorinahorizontalplanecontainingthe courselineandlimitedbythelociofpointsnearesttothe course line at which the DDM is 0.155.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. DDMDifferenceindepthofmodulation.Thepercentage modulationdepthofthelargersignalminusthe percentagemodulationdepthofthesmallersignal, divided by 100.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Displacementsensitivity(localizer).Theratioofmeasured DDMtothecorrespondinglateraldisplacementfromthe appropriate reference line.10/1/2014 Page 13 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. FacilityPerformanceCategoryIILS.AnILSwhich providesguidanceinformationfromthecoveragelimitof theILStothepointatwhichthelocalizercourseline intersectstheILSglidepathataheightof60 m(200 ft)or less above the horizontal plane containing the threshold.Note.Thisdefinitionisnotintendedtopreclude theuseofFacilityPerformanceCategoryIILSbelow theheightof60 m(200 ft),withvisualreferencewhere thequalityoftheguidanceprovidedpermits,andwhere satisfactoryoperationalprocedureshavebeen established.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. FacilityPerformanceCategoryIIILS.AnILSwhich providesguidanceinformationfromthecoveragelimitof theILStothepointatwhichthelocalizercourseline intersectstheILSglidepathataheightof15 m(50 ft)or less above the horizontal plane containing the threshold.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. FacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIILS.AnILSwhich, withtheaidofancillaryequipmentwherenecessary, providesguidanceinformationfromthecoveragelimitof the facility to, and along, the surface of the runway.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Frontcoursesector.Thecoursesectorwhichissituatedon the same side of the localizer as the runway.10/1/2014 Page 14 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Halfcoursesector.Thesector,inahorizontalplane containingthecourselineandlimitedbythelociof pointsnearesttothecourselineatwhichtheDDMis 0.0775.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. HalfILSglidepathsector.Thesectorintheverticalplane containingtheILSglidepathandlimitedbythelociof pointsnearesttotheglidepathatwhichtheDDMis 0.0875.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILScontinuityofservice.Thatqualitywhichrelatestothe rarityofradiatedsignalinterruptions.Thelevelof continuityofserviceofthelocalizerortheglidepathis expressedintermsoftheprobabilityofnotlosingthe radiated guidance signals.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSglidepathangle.Theanglebetweenastraightlinewhich representsthemeanoftheILSglidepathandthe horizontal.10/1/2014 Page 15 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSglidepathsector.Thesectorintheverticalplane containingtheILSglidepathandlimitedbythelociof pointsnearesttotheglidepathatwhichtheDDMis 0.175.Note.TheILSglidepathsectorislocatedinthe verticalplanecontainingtherunwaycentreline,andis dividedbytheradiatedglidepathintwopartscalled uppersectorandlowersector,referringrespectivelyto the sectors above and below the glide path.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSglidepath.Thatlocusofpointsintheverticalplane containingtherunwaycentrelineatwhichtheDDMis zero,which,ofallsuchloci,istheclosesttothe horizontal plane.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSintegrity.Thatqualitywhichrelatestothetrustwhich canbeplacedinthecorrectnessoftheinformation suppliedbythefacility.Thelevelofintegrityofthe localizerortheglidepathisexpressedintermsofthe probability of not radiating false guidance signals.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSPointA.ApointontheILSglidepathmeasuredalong theextendedrunwaycentrelineintheapproachdirection a distance of 7.5 km (4 NM) from the threshold.10/1/2014 Page 16 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSPointB.ApointontheILSglidepathmeasuredalong theextendedrunwaycentrelineintheapproachdirection a distance of 1 050 m (3 500 ft) from the threshold.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSPointC.Apointthroughwhichthedownward extendedstraightportionofthenominalILSglidepath passesataheightof30 m(100 ft)abovethehorizontal plane containing the threshold.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSPointD.Apoint4 m(12 ft)abovetherunwaycentre lineand900 m(3 000 ft)fromthethresholdinthe direction of the localizer.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSPointE.Apoint4 m(12 ft)abovetherunwaycentre lineand600 m(2 000 ft)fromthestopendoftherunway in the direction of the threshold.Note. See Attachment C, Figure C-1.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. ILSreferencedatum(PointT).Apointataspecified heightlocatedabovetheintersectionoftherunway centrelineandthethresholdandthroughwhichthe downwardextendedstraightportionoftheILSglidepath passes.10/1/2014 Page 17 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Two-frequencyglidepathsystem.AnILSglidepathinwhich coverageisachievedbytheuseoftwoindependent radiationfieldpatternsspacedonseparatecarrier frequencies within the particular glide path channel.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceDefinitionCAR Part 171. Two-frequencylocalizersystem.Alocalizersysteminwhich coverageisachievedbytheuseoftwoindependent radiationfieldpatternsspacedonseparatecarrier frequencies within the particular localizer VHF channel.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardNote: c) DME is used in all cases.CAR Part 171.3.1.2.13.1.2 Basic requirementsThe ILS shall comprise the following basic components:a) VHFlocalizerequipment,associatedmonitorsystem, remote control and indicator equipment;b) UHFglidepathequipment,associatedmonitor system, remote control and indicator equipment;c) VHFmarkerbeacons,oradistancemeasuring equipment(DME)inaccordancewithsection3.5, togetherwithassociatedmonitorsystemandremote control and indicator equipment.Note.GuidancematerialrelativetotheuseofDMEas analternativetothemarkerbeaconcomponentoftheILSis contained in Attachment C, 2.11.10/1/2014 Page 18 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.1.1FacilityPerformanceCategoriesI,IIandIIIILSshall provideindicationsatdesignatedremotecontrolpointsofthe operationalstatusofallILSgroundsystemcomponents,as follows:a) forallCategoryIIandCategoryIIIILS,theairtraffic servicesunitinvolvedinthecontrolofaircraftonthe finalapproachshallbeoneofthedesignatedremote controlpointsandshallreceiveinformationonthe operationalstatusoftheILS,withadelay commensuratewiththerequirementsofthe operational environment;b) foraCategoryIILS,ifthatILSprovidesanessential radionavigationservice,theairtrafficservicesunit involvedinthecontrolofaircraftonthefinal approachshallbeoneofthedesignatedremote controlpointsandshallreceiveinformationonthe operationalstatusoftheILS,withadelay commensuratewiththerequirementsofthe operational environment.N1.TheindicationsrequiredbythisStandardare intendedasatooltosupportairtrafficmanagement functions,andtheapplicabletimelinessrequirementsare sizedaccordingly(consistentlywith2.8.1).Timeliness requirementsapplicabletotheILSintegritymonitoring functionsthatprotectaircraftfromILSmalfunctionsare specified in 3.1.3.11.3.1 and 3.1.5.7.3.1.N2.Itisintendedthattheairtrafficsystemislikelyto callforadditionalprovisionswhichmaybefoundessential fortheattainmentoffulloperationalCategoryIIIcapability, e.g.toprovideadditionallateralandlongitudinalguidance duringthelandingroll-out,andtaxiing,andtoensure enhancement of the integrity and reliability of the system.10/1/2014 Page 19 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.2TheILSshallbeconstructedandadjustedsothat,ata specifieddistancefromthethreshold,similarinstrumental indicationsintheaircraftrepresentsimilardisplacementsfrom thecourselineorILSglidepathasappropriate,irrespectiveof the particular ground installation in use.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.3Thelocalizerandglidepathcomponentsspecifiedin3.1.2.1 a) andb)whichformpartofaFacilityPerformanceCategoryI ILSshallcomplyatleastwiththeStandardsin3.1.3 and3.1.5 respectively,exceptingthoseinwhichapplicationtoFacility Performance Category II ILS is prescribed.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.4Thelocalizerandglidepathcomponentsspecifiedin3.1.2.1 a) andb)abovewhichformpartofaFacilityPerformance CategoryIIILSshallcomplywiththeStandardsapplicable tothesecomponentsinaFacilityPerformanceCategoryI ILS,assupplementedoramendedbytheStandardsin3.1.3 and3.1.5 inwhichapplicationtoFacilityPerformance Category II ILS is prescribed.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.5Thelocalizerandglidepathcomponentsandotherancillary equipmentspecifiedin3.1.2.1.1,whichformpartofaFacility PerformanceCategoryIIIILS,shallotherwisecomplywith theStandardsapplicabletothesecomponentsinFacility PerformanceCategoriesIandIIILS,exceptas supplementedbytheStandardsin3.1.3 and3.1.5 inwhich applicationtoFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIILSis prescribed.10/1/2014 Page 20 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.6Toensureanadequatelevelofsafety,theILSshallbeso designedandmaintainedthattheprobabilityofoperation withintheperformancerequirementsspecifiedisofahigh value,consistentwiththecategoryofoperational performance concerned.Note.ThespecificationsforFacilityPerformance CategoriesIIandIIIILSareintendedtoachievethe highestdegreeofsystemintegrity,reliabilityandstabilityof operationunderthemostadverseenvironmentalconditions tobeencountered.Guidancematerialtoachievethis objectiveinCategoriesIIandIIIoperationsisgivenin2.8 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.7AtthoselocationswheretwoseparateILSfacilitiesserve oppositeendsofasinglerunway,aninterlockshallensure thatonlythelocalizerservingtheapproachdirectioninuse shallradiate,exceptwherethelocalizerinoperationaluseis FacilityPerformanceCategoryIILSandnooperationally harmful interference results.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.2.7.1Recommendation.Atthoselocationswheretwoseparate ILSfacilitiesserveoppositeendsofasinglerunwayand whereaFacilityPerformanceCategoryI-ILSistobeused forauto-coupledapproachesandlandingsinvisual conditionsaninterlockshouldensurethatonlythelocalizer servingtheapproachdirectioninuseradiates,providing theotherlocalizerisnotrequiredforsimultaneous operational use.Note.Ifbothlocalizersradiatethereisapossibilityof interferencetothelocalizersignalsinthethresholdregion. Additionalguidancematerialiscontainedin2.1.9 and2.13 of Attachment C.10/1/2014 Page 21 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.2.7.2AtlocationswhereILSfacilitiesservingoppositeendsofthe samerunwayordifferentrunwaysatthesameairportusethe samepairedfrequencies,aninterlockshallensurethatonly onefacilityshallradiateatatime.Whenswitchingfromone ILSfacilitytoanother,radiationfrombothshallbe suppressed for not less than 20 seconds.Note.Additionalguidancematerialontheoperation oflocalizersonthesamefrequencychanneliscontainedin 2.1.9 of Attachment C and Volume V, Chapter 4.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.1.13.1.3 VHF localizer and associated monitorIntroduction.ThespecificationsinthissectioncoverILS localizersprovidingeitherpositiveguidanceinformationover 360 degreesofazimuth,orprovidingsuchguidanceonly withinaspecifiedportionofthefrontcoverage(see3.1.3.7.4). WhereILSlocalizersprovidingpositiveguidanceinformation inalimitedsectorareinstalled,informationfromsomesuitably locatednavigationaid,togetherwithappropriateprocedures, willgenerallyberequiredtoensurethatanymisleading guidanceinformationoutsidethesectorisnotoperationally significant.3.1.3.1 GeneralTheradiationfromthelocalizerantennasystemshallproduce acompositefieldpatternwhichisamplitudemodulatedbya 90 Hzanda150 Hztone.Theradiationfieldpatternshall produceacoursesectorwithonetonepredominatingonone sideofthecourseandwiththeothertonepredominatingon the opposite side.10/1/2014 Page 22 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.1.2Whenanobserverfacesthelocalizerfromtheapproachend ofarunway,thedepthofmodulationoftheradiofrequency carrierduetothe150 Hztoneshallpredominateonthe observer'srighthandandthatduetothe90 Hztoneshall predominate on the observer's left hand.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.1.3Allhorizontalanglesemployedinspecifyingthelocalizerfield patternsshalloriginatefromthecentreofthelocalizerantenna systemwhichprovidesthesignalsusedinthefrontcourse sector.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.2.13.1.3.2 Radio frequencyThelocalizershalloperateintheband108 MHzto111.975 MHz.Whereasingleradiofrequencycarrierisused,the frequencytoleranceshallnotexceedplusorminus0.005 per cent.Wheretworadiofrequencycarriersareused,the frequencytoleranceshallnotexceed0.002 percentandthe nominalbandoccupiedbythecarriersshallbesymmetrical abouttheassignedfrequency.Withalltolerancesapplied,the frequencyseparationbetweenthecarriersshallnotbeless than 5 kHz nor more than 14 kHz.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.2.2Theemissionfromthelocalizershallbehorizontallypolarized. Theverticallypolarizedcomponentoftheradiationonthe courselineshallnotexceedthatwhichcorrespondstoaDDM errorof0.016 whenanaircraftispositionedonthecourseline and is in a roll attitude of 20 degrees from the horizontal.10/1/2014 Page 23 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.2.2.1ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIlocalizers,thevertically polarizedcomponentoftheradiationonthecourselineshall notexceedthatwhichcorrespondstoaDDMerrorof0.008 whenanaircraftispositionedonthecourselineandisina roll attitude of 20 degrees from the horizontal.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.2.2.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers,thevertically polarizedcomponentoftheradiationwithinasectorbounded by0.02 DDMeithersideofthecourselineshallnotexceed thatwhichcorrespondstoaDDMerrorof0.005 whenan aircraft is in a roll attitude of 20 degrees from the horizontal.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.2.3ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers,signals emanatingfromthetransmittershallcontainnocomponents whichresultinanapparentcourselinefluctuationofmore than0.005 DDMpeaktopeakinthefrequencyband0.01 Hz to 10 Hz.10/1/2014 Page 24 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 3ReferenceStandardNote: details of limitations are published in AIPNZ.CAR Part 171. Because of siting problems and terrain limitations some localizers do not meet Category I facility performance criteria for off course clearance.3.1.3.3.13.1.3.3 CoverageNote.Guidancematerialonlocalizercoverageis giveninAttachmentC,2.1.10 andFiguresC-7A,C-7B,C-8A and C-8B.Thelocalizershallprovidesignalssufficienttoallow satisfactoryoperationofatypicalaircraftinstallationwithin thelocalizerandglidepathcoveragesectors.Thelocalizer coveragesectorshallextendfromthecentreofthelocalizer antenna system to distances of:46.3 km(25 NM)withinplusorminus10 degreesfromthe front course line;31.5 km(17 NM)between10 degreesand35 degreesfrom the front course line;18.5 km(10 NM)outsideofplusorminus35 degreesfrom the front course line if coverage is provided;exceptthat,wheretopographicalfeaturesdictateor operationalrequirementspermit,thelimitsmaybereduced downto33.3 km(18 NM)withintheplusorminus10-degree sectorand18.5 km(10 NM)withintheremainderofthe coveragewhenalternativenavigationalmeansprovide satisfactorycoveragewithintheintermediateapproacharea. Thelocalizersignalsshallbereceivableatthedistances specifiedatandaboveaheightof600 m(2 000 ft)abovethe elevationofthethreshold,or300 m(1 000 ft)abovethe elevationofthehighestpointwithintheintermediateandfinal approachareas,whicheveristhehigher,exceptthat,where neededtoprotectILSperformanceandifoperational requirementspermit,thelowerlimitofcoverageatangles beyond15 degreesfromthefrontcourselineshallberaised linearlyfromitsheightat15 degreestoashighas1 350 m(4 500 ft)abovetheelevationofthethresholdat35 degreesfrom thefrontcourseline.Suchsignalsshallbereceivable,tothe distancesspecified,uptoasurfaceextendingoutwardfrom thelocalizerantennaandinclinedat7 degreesabovethe horizontal.Note.Whereinterveningobstaclespenetratethelower 10/1/2014 Page 25 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006surface,itisintendedthatguidanceneednotbeprovidedat less than line-of-sight heights.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.2Inallpartsofthecoveragevolumespecifiedin3.1.3.3.1,other thanasspecifiedin3.1.3.3.2.1,3.1.3.3.2.2 and3.1.3.3.2.3,the fieldstrengthshallbenotlessthan40 microvoltspermetre (minus 114 dBW/m2).Note.Thisminimumfieldstrengthisrequiredto permitsatisfactoryoperationalusageofILSlocalizer facilities.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.2.1ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIlocalizers,theminimum fieldstrengthontheILSgatepathandwithinthelocalizer coursesectorfromadistanceof18.5 km(10 NM)toaheight of60 m(200 ft)abovethehorizontalplanecontainingthe thresholdshallbenotlessthan90 microvoltspermetre (minus 107 dBW/m2).No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.2.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIlocalizers,theminimum fieldstrengthontheILSglidepathandwithinthelocalizer coursesectorshallbenotlessthan100 microvoltspermetre (minus106 dBW/m2)atadistanceof18.5 km(10 NM) increasingtonotlessthan200 microvoltspermetre(minus 100dBW/m2)ataheightof15 m(50 ft)abovethehorizontal plane containing the threshold.10/1/2014 Page 26 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.2.3ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers,theminimum fieldstrengthontheILSglidepathandwithinthelocalizer coursesectorshallbenotlessthan100 microvoltspermetre (minus106 dBW/m2)atadistanceof18.5 km(10 NM), increasingtonotlessthan200 microvoltspermetre(minus 100 dBW/m2)at6 m(20 ft)abovethehorizontalplane containingthethreshold.Fromthispointtoafurtherpoint4 m(12 ft)abovetherunwaycentreline,and300 m(1 000 ft) fromthethresholdinthedirectionofthelocalizer,and thereafterataheightof4 m(12 ft)alongthelengthofthe runwayinthedirectionofthelocalizer,thefieldstrengthshall benotlessthan100 microvoltspermetre(minus106 dBW/m2).Note.Thefieldstrengthsgivenin3.1.3.3.2.2 and 3.1.3.3.2.3 arenecessarytoprovidethesignal-to-noiseratio required for improved integrity.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.3Recommendation.Above7 degrees,thesignalsshouldbe reduced to as low a value as practicable.N1.Therequirementsin3.1.3.3.1,3.1.3.3.2.1,3.1.3.3.2.2 and3.1.3.3.2.3 arebasedontheassumptionthattheaircraft is heading directly toward the facility.N2.Guidancematerialonsignificantairbornereceiver parameters is given in 2.2.2 and 2.2.4 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.4Whencoverageisachievedbyalocalizerusingtworadio frequencycarriers,onecarrierprovidingaradiationfield patterninthefrontcoursesectorandtheotherprovidinga radiationfieldpatternoutsidethatsector,theratioofthetwo carriersignalstrengthsinspacewithinthefrontcoursesector tothecoveragelimitsspecifiedat3.1.3.3.1 aboveshallnotbe less than 10 dB.Note.Guidancematerialonlocalizersachieving coveragewithtworadiofrequencycarriersisgiveninthe Note to 3.1.3.11.2 and in 2.7 of Attachment C.10/1/2014 Page 27 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.3.5Recommendation.ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIII localizers,theratioofthetwocarriersignalstrengthsin spacewithinthefrontcoursesectorshouldnotbelessthan 16 dB.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.4.13.1.3.4 Course structureForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIlocalizers,bendsinthe courselineshallnothaveamplitudeswhichexceedthe following: Zone Amplitude (DDM) (95% probability)Outer limit of coverage to ILS Point A0.031ILS Point A to ILS Point B 0.031 at ILS Point A decreasing at a linear rate to 0.015 at ILS Point BILS Point B to ILS Point C0.01510/1/2014 Page 28 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.4.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIIandIIIlocalizers,bends inthecourselineshallnothaveamplitudeswhichexceedthe following: Zone Amplitude (DDM) (95% probability)Outer limit of coverage to ILS Point A0.031ILS Point A to ILS Point B 0.031 at ILS Point A decreasing at a linear rate to 0.005 at ILS Point BILS Point B to ILS reference datum0.005and, for Category III only:ILS reference datum to ILS Point D0.005ILS Point D to ILS Point E 0.005 at ILS Point D increasing at a linear rate to 0.010 at ILS Point EN1.Theamplitudesreferredtoin3.1.3.4.1 and 43.1.3.4.2 aretheDDMsduetobendsasrealizedonthe mean course line, when correctly adjusted.N2.Guidancematerialrelevanttothelocalizercourse structure is given in 32.1.4, 2.1.6 and 2.1.7 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.13.1.3.5 Carrier modulationThenominaldepthofmodulationoftheradiofrequency carrierduetoeachofthe90 Hzand150 Hztonesshallbe20 per cent along the course line.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.2Thedepthofmodulationoftheradiofrequencycarrierdueto eachofthe90 Hzand150 Hztonesshallbewithinthelimitsof 18 and 22 per cent.10/1/2014 Page 29 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3Thefollowingtolerancesshallbeappliedtothefrequenciesof the modulating tones:a) themodulatingtonesshallbe90Hzand150Hz within plus or minus 2.5 per cent;b) themodulatingtonesshallbe90Hzand150Hz withinplusorminus1.5percentforFacility Performance Category II installations;c) themodulatingtonesshallbe90Hzand150Hz withinplusorminus1percentforFacility Performance Category III installations;d) thetotalharmoniccontentofthe90Hztoneshallnot exceed10percent;additionally,forFacility PerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers,thesecond harmonicofthe90Hztoneshallnotexceed5per cent;e) thetotalharmoniccontentofthe150Hztoneshall not exceed 10 per cent.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.1Recommendation.ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryI ILS,themodulatingtonesshouldbe90 Hzand150 Hz within plus or minus 1.5 per cent where practicable.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers,thedepthof amplitudemodulationoftheradiofrequencycarrieratthe powersupplyfrequencyoritsharmonics,orbyother unwantedcomponents,shallnotexceed0.5 percent. Harmonicsofthesupply,orotherunwantednoise componentsthatmayintermodulatewiththe90 Hzand150Hz navigationtonesortheirharmonicstoproducefluctuationsin thecourseline,shallnotexceed0.05 percentmodulation depth of the radio frequency carrier.10/1/2014 Page 30 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.3Themodulationtonesshallbephase-lockedsothatwithinthe halfcoursesector,thedemodulated90 Hzand150 Hzwave forms pass through zero in the same direction within:a) forFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIandIIlocalizers: 20 degrees; andb) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers:10 degrees,ofphaserelativetothe150 Hzcomponent,everyhalfcycleof the combined 90 Hz and 150 Hz wave form.N1.Thedefinitionofphaserelationshipinthismanneris notintendedtoimplyarequirementtomeasurethephase within the half course sector.N2.Guidancematerialrelativetosuchmeasurementis given at Figure C-6 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.4Withtwo-frequencylocalizersystems,3.1.3.5.3.3 shallapply toeachcarrier.Inaddition,the90 Hzmodulatingtoneofone carriershallbephase-lockedtothe90 Hzmodulatingtoneof theothercarriersothatthedemodulatedwaveformspass through zero in the same direction within:a) for Categories I and II localizers: 20 degrees; andb) for Category III localizers: 10 degrees,ofphaserelativeto90 Hz.Similarly,the150 Hztonesofthe twocarriersshallbephase-lockedsothatthedemodulated wave forms pass through zero in the same direction within:1)for Categories I and II localizers: 20 degrees; and2)for Category III localizers: 10 degrees,of phase relative to 150 Hz.10/1/2014 Page 31 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.5Alternativetwo-frequencylocalizersystemsthatemploy audiophasingdifferentfromthenormalin-phaseconditions describedin3.1.3.5.3.4 shallbepermitted.Inthisalternative system,the90 Hzto90 Hzphasingandthe150 Hzto150 Hz phasingshallbeadjustedtotheirnominalvaluestowithin limits equivalent to those stated in 3.1.3.5.3.4.Note.Thisistoensurecorrectairbornereceiver operationintheregionawayfromthecourselinewherethe two carrier signal strengths are approximately equal.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.6Recommendation.Thesumofthemodulationdepthsofthe radiofrequencycarrierduetothe90 Hzand150 Hztones shouldnotexceed60 percentorbelessthan30 percent within the required coverage.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.6.1Forequipmentfirstinstalledafter1 January2000,thesumof themodulationdepthsoftheradiofrequencycarrierdueto the90 Hzand150 Hztonesshallnotexceed60 percentorbe less than 30 per cent within the required coverage.N1.Ifthesumofthemodulationdepthsisgreaterthan60 percentforFacilityPerformanceCategoryIlocalizers,the nominaldisplacementsensitivitymaybeadjustedas providedforin3.1.3.7.1 toachievetheabovemodulation limit.N2.Fortwo-frequencysystems,thestandardfor maximumsumofmodulationdepthsdoesnotapplyator nearazimuthswherethecourseandclearancecarriersignal levelsareequalinamplitude(i.e.atazimuthswhereboth transmittingsystemshaveasignificantcontributiontothe total modulation depth).N3.Thestandardforminimumsumofmodulationdepths isbasedonthemalfunctioningalarmlevelbeingsetashigh as 30 per cent as stated in 2.3.3 of Attachment C.10/1/2014 Page 32 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.3.7Whenutilizingalocalizerforradiotelephonecommunications, thesumofthemodulationdepthsoftheradiofrequency carrierduetothe90 Hzand150 Hztonesshallnotexceed65 percentwithin10 degreesofthecourselineandshallnot exceed 78 per cent at any other point around the localizer.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.5.4Recommendation.Undesiredfrequencyandphase modulationonILSlocalizerradiofrequencycarriersthat canaffectthedisplayedDDMvaluesinlocalizerreceivers should be minimized to the extent practical.Note.Relevantguidancematerialisgivenin2.15 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.6.13.1.3.6 Course alignment accuracyThemeancourselineshallbeadjustedandmaintainedwithin limitsequivalenttothefollowingdisplacementsfromthe runway centre line at the ILS reference datum:a) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIlocalizers:plusor minus10.5m(35ft),orthelinearequivalentof0.015 DDM, whichever is less;b) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIlocalizers:plus or minus 7.5 m (25 ft);c) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers:plus or minus 3 m (10 ft).10/1/2014 Page 33 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.6.2Recommendation.ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryII localizers,themeancourselineshouldbeadjustedand maintainedwithinlimitsequivalenttoplusorminus4.5 m (15 ft)displacementfromrunwaycentrelineattheILS reference datum.N1.ItisintendedthatFacilityPerformanceCategoriesII andIIIinstallationsbeadjustedandmaintainedsothatthe limitsspecifiedin3.1.3.6.1 and3.1.3.6.2 arereachedonvery rareoccasions.Itisfurtherintendedthatdesignand operationofthetotalILSgroundsystembeofsufficient integrity to accomplish this aim.N2.ItisintendedthatnewCategoryIIinstallationsare to meet the requirements of 3.1.3.6.2.N3.Guidancematerialonmeasurementoflocalizer course alignment is given in 2.1.3 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.7.13.1.3.7 Displacement sensitivityThenominaldisplacementsensitivitywithinthehalfcourse sectorshallbetheequivalentof0.00145 DDM/m(0.00044 DDM/ft)attheILSreferencedatumexceptthatforCategoryI localizers,wherethespecifiednominaldisplacement sensitivitycannotbemet,thedisplacementsensitivityshall beadjustedasnearaspossibletothatvalue.ForFacility PerformanceCategoryIlocalizersonrunwaycodes1 and2, thenominaldisplacementsensitivityshallbeachievedatthe ILSPointB.Themaximumcoursesectorangleshallnot exceed 6 degrees.Note. Runway codes 1 and 2 are defined in Annex 14.10/1/2014 Page 34 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.7.2Thelateraldisplacementsensitivityshallbeadjustedand maintained within the limits of plus or minus:a) 17percentofthenominalvalueforFacility Performance Categories I and II;b) 10percentofthenominalvalueforFacility Performance Category III.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.7.3Recommendation.ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryII- ILS,displacementsensitivityshouldbeadjustedand maintainedwithinthelimitsofplusorminus10 percent where practicable.N1.Thefiguresgivenin3.1.3.7.1,3.1.3.7.2 and3.1.3.7.3 arebaseduponanominalsectorwidthof210 m(700 ft)at theappropriatepoint,i.e.ILSPointBonrunwaycodes1 and 2, and the ILS reference datum on other runways.N2.Guidancematerialonthealignmentand displacementsensitivityoflocalizersusingtworadio frequency carriers is given in 2.7 of Attachment C.N3.Guidancematerialonmeasurementoflocalizer displacement sensitivity is given in 2.9 of Attachment C.10/1/2014 Page 35 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.7.4TheincreaseofDDMshallbesubstantiallylinearwithrespect toangulardisplacementfromthefrontcourseline(where DDMiszero)uptoanangleoneithersideofthefrontcourse linewheretheDDMis0.180.Fromthatangletoplusorminus 10 degrees,theDDMshallnotbelessthan0.180.Fromplus orminus10 degreestoplusorminus35 degrees,theDDM shallnotbelessthan0.155.Wherecoverageisrequired outsideoftheplusorminus35 degreessector,theDDMin theareaofthecoverage,exceptinthebackcoursesector, shall not be less than 0.155.N1.ThelinearityofchangeofDDMwithrespectto angulardisplacementisparticularlyimportantinthe neighbourhood of the course line.N2.TheaboveDDMinthe10-35 degreesectoristobe consideredaminimumrequirementfortheuseofILSasa landingaid.Whereverpracticable,ahigherDDM,e.g. 0.180,isadvantageoustoassisthighspeedaircraftto executelargeangleinterceptsatoperationallydesirable distancesprovidedthatlimitsonmodulationpercentage given in 3.1.3.5.3.6 are metN3.Whereverpracticable,thelocalizercapturelevelof automaticflightcontrolsystemsistobesetatorbelow 0.175 DDM in order to prevent false localizer captures.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.8.13.1.3.8 VoiceFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIandIIlocalizersmayprovide aground-to-airradiotelephonecommunicationchanneltobe operatedsimultaneouslywiththenavigationand identificationsignals,providedthatsuchoperationshallnot interfere in any way with the basic localizer function.10/1/2014 Page 36 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.8.2CategoryIIIlocalizersshallnotprovidesuchachannel, exceptwhereextremecarehasbeentakeninthedesignand operationofthefacilitytoensurethatthereisnopossibility of interference with the navigational guidance.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.8.3Ifthechannelisprovided,itshallconformwiththefollowing Standards:No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.8.3.1Thechannelshallbeonthesameradiofrequencycarrieror carriersasusedforthelocalizerfunction,andtheradiation shallbehorizontallypolarized.Wheretwocarriersare modulatedwithspeech,therelativephasesofthe modulationsonthetwocarriersshallbesuchastoavoidthe occurrence of nulls within the coverage of the localizer.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.8.3.2Thepeakmodulationdepthofthecarrierorcarriersduetothe radiotelephonecommunicationsshallnotexceed50 percent but shall be adjusted so that:a) theratioofpeakmodulationdepthduetothe radiotelephonecommunicationstothatduetothe identification signal is approximately 9:1; b) thesumofmodulationcomponentsduetouseofthe radiotelephonechannel,navigationalsignalsand identification signals shall not exceed 95 per cent.10/1/2014 Page 37 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.8.3.3Theaudiofrequencycharacteristicsoftheradiotelephone channelshallbeflattowithin3 dBrelativetothelevelat1 000 Hz over the range 300 Hz to 3 000 Hz.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.9.13.1.3.9 IdentificationThelocalizershallprovideforthesimultaneoustransmission ofanidentificationsignal,specifictotherunwayand approachdirection,onthesameradiofrequencycarrieror carriersasusedforthelocalizerfunction.Thetransmissionof theidentificationsignalshallnotinterfereinanywaywiththe basic localizer function.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.9.2TheidentificationsignalshallbeproducedbyClassA2A modulationoftheradiofrequencycarrierorcarriersusinga modulationtoneof1 020 Hzwithinplusorminus50 Hz.The depthofmodulationshallbebetweenthelimitsof5 and15 percentexceptthat,wherearadiotelephonecommunication channelisprovided,thedepthofmodulationshallbe adjustedsothattheratioofpeakmodulationdepthdueto radiotelephonecommunicationstothatduetothe identificationsignalmodulationisapproximately9:1 (see 3.1.3.8.3.2).Theemissionscarryingtheidentificationsignal shallbehorizontallypolarized.Wheretwocarriersare modulatedwithidentificationsignals,therelativephaseofthe modulationsshallbesuchastoavoidtheoccurrenceofnulls within the coverage of the localizer.10/1/2014 Page 38 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.9.3TheidentificationsignalshallemploytheInternationalMorse Codeandconsistoftwoorthreeletters.Itmaybepreceded bytheInternationalMorseCodesignaloftheletterI, followedbyashortpausewhereitisnecessarytodistinguish theILSfacilityfromothernavigationalfacilitiesinthe immediate area.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.9.4Theidentificationsignalshallbetransmittedbydotsand dashesataspeedcorrespondingtoapproximatelyseven wordsperminute,andshallberepeatedatapproximately equalintervals,notlessthansixtimesperminute,atalltimes duringwhichthelocalizerisavailableforoperationaluse. Whenthetransmissionsofthelocalizerarenotavailablefor operationaluse,as,forexample,afterremovalofnavigational components,orduringmaintenanceortesttransmissions,the identificationsignalshallbesuppressed.Thedotsshallhave adurationof0.1 secondto0.160 second.Thedashduration shallbetypicallythreetimesthedurationofadot.The intervalbetweendotsand/ordashesshallbeequaltothatof onedotplusorminus10 percent.Theintervalbetweenletters shall not be less than the duration of three dots.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.10.13.1.3.10 SitingForFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIIandIII,thelocalizer antennasystemshallbelocatedontheextensionofthecentre lineoftherunwayatthestopend,andtheequipmentshallbe adjustedsothatthecourselineswillbeinaverticalplane containingthecentrelineoftherunwayserved.Theantenna heightandlocationshallbeconsistentwithsafeobstruction clearance practices.10/1/2014 Page 39 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.10.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryI,thelocalizerantenna systemshallbelocatedandadjustedasin3.1.3.10.1,unless siteconstraintsdictatethattheantennabeoffsetfromthe centre line of the runway.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.10.2.1Theoffsetlocalizersystemshallbelocatedandadjustedin accordancewiththeoffsetILSprovisionsoftheProcedures forAirNavigationServicesAircraftOperations (PANS-OPS)(Doc8168),VolumeII,andthelocalizer standardsshallbereferencedtotheassociatedfictitious threshold point.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.13.1.3.11 MonitoringTheautomaticmonitorsystemshallprovideawarningtothe designatedcontrolpointsandcauseoneofthefollowingto occur,withintheperiodspecifiedin3.1.3.11.3.1,ifanyofthe conditions stated in 3.1.3.11.2 persist:a) radiation to cease; andb) removalofthenavigationandidentification components from the carrier.10/1/2014 Page 40 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.2Theconditionsrequiringinitiationofmonitoractionshallbe the following:a) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIlocalizers,ashift ofthemeancourselinefromtherunwaycentreline equivalenttomorethan10.5m(35ft),orthelinear equivalentto0.015DDM,whicheverisless,atthe ILS reference datum;b) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIlocalizers,ashift ofthemeancourselinefromtherunwaycentreline equivalenttomorethan7.5m(25ft)attheILS reference datum;c) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizers,a shiftofthemeancourselinefromtherunwaycentre lineequivalenttomorethan6m(20ft)attheILS reference datum;d) inthecaseoflocalizersinwhichthebasicfunctions areprovidedbytheuseofasingle-frequency system,areductionofpoweroutputtoalevelsuch thatanyoftherequirementsof3.1.3.3,3.1.3.4or 3.1.3.5arenolongersatisfied,ortoalevelthatisless than50percentofthenormallevel(whichever occurs first);e) inthecaseoflocalizersinwhichthebasicfunctions areprovidedbytheuseofatwo-frequencysystem,a reductionofpoweroutputforeithercarriertoless than80percentofnormal,exceptthatagreater reductiontobetween80percentand50percentof normalmaybepermitted,providedthelocalizer continuestomeettherequirementsof3.1.3.3,3.1.3.4 and 3.1.3.5;Note.Itisimportanttorecognizethatafrequency changeresultinginalossofthefrequencydifference specifiedin3.1.3.2.1 mayproduceahazardouscondition. Thisproblemisofgreateroperationalsignificancefor CategoriesIIandIIIinstallations.Asnecessary,thisproblem canbedealtwiththroughspecialmonitoringprovisionsor highly reliable circuitry.10/1/2014 Page 41 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006f) changeofdisplacementsensitivitytoavalue differingbymorethan17percentfromthenominal value for the localizer facility.Note.Inselectingthepowerreductionfiguretobe employedinmonitoringreferredtoin3.1.3.11.2 e), particularattentionisdirectedtoverticalandhorizontal lobestructure(verticallobingduetodifferentantenna heights)ofthecombinedradiationsystemswhentwo carriersareemployed.Largechangesinthepowerratio betweencarriersmayresultinlowclearanceareasandfalse coursesintheoff-courseareastothelimitsofthevertical coverage requirements specified in 3.1.3.3.1.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.2.1Recommendation.Inthecaseoflocalizersinwhichthe basicfunctionsareprovidedbytheuseofatwo-frequency system,theconditionsrequiringinitiationofmonitoraction shouldincludethecasewhentheDDMintherequired coveragebeyondplusorminus10 degreesfromthefront courseline,exceptinthebackcoursesector,decreases below 0.155.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.3Thetotalperiodofradiation,includingperiod(s)ofzero radiation,outsidetheperformancelimitsspecifiedina),b),c), d),e)andf)of3.1.3.11.2 shallbeasshortaspracticable, consistentwiththeneedforavoidinginterruptionsofthe navigation service provided by the localizer.10/1/2014 Page 42 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.3.1Thetotalperiodreferredtounder3.1.3.11.3 shallnotexceed under any circumstances:10 seconds for Category I localizers;5 seconds for Category II localizers;2 seconds for Category III localizers.N1. Thet ot al t i meperi odsspeci f i edare never-to-be-exceededlimitsandareintendedtoprotect aircraftinthefinalstagesofapproachagainstprolongedor repeatedperiodsoflocalizerguidanceoutsidethemonitor limits.Forthisreason,theyincludenotonlytheinitial periodofoutsidetoleranceoperationbutalsothetotalof anyorallperiodsofoutsidetoleranceradiationincluding period(s)ofzeroradiationandtimerequiredtoremovethe navigationandidentificationcomponentsfromthecarrier, whichmightoccurduringactiontorestoreservice,for example,inthecourseofconsecutivemonitorfunctioning andconsequentchangeover(s)tolocalizerequipmentor elements thereof.N2.Fromanoperationalpointofview,theintentionis thatnoguidanceoutsidethemonitorlimitsberadiatedafter thetimeperiodsgiven,andthatnofurtherattemptsbemade torestoreserviceuntilaperiodintheorderof20 seconds has elapsed.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.3.2Recommendation.Wherepracticable,thetotalperiod under3.1.3.11.3.1 shouldbereducedsoasnottoexceedtwo secondsforCategoryIIlocalizersandonesecondfor Category III localizers.10/1/2014 Page 43 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.11.4Designandoperationofthemonitorsystemshallbe consistentwiththerequirementthatnavigationguidanceand identificationwillberemovedandawarningprovidedatthe designatedremotecontrolpointsintheeventoffailureofthe monitor system itself.Note.Guidancematerialonthedesignandoperation of monitor systems is given in Attachment C, 2.1.7.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.12.13.1.3.12 Integrity and continuity of service requirementsTheprobabilityofnotradiatingfalseguidancesignalsshall notbelessthan1 0.5 10-9inanyonelandingforFacility Performance Categories II and III localizers.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.12.2Recommendation.Theprobabilityofnotradiatingfalse guidancesignalsshouldnotbelessthan1 1.0 10-7in anyonelandingforFacilityPerformanceCategoryI localizers.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.3.12.3Theprobabilityofnotlosingtheradiatedguidancesignal shall be greater than:a) 1210-6inanyperiodof15secondsforFacility PerformanceCategoryIIlocalizersorlocalizers intendedtobeusedforCategoryIIIAoperations (equivalentto2000hoursmeantimebetween outages); andb) 1210-6inanyperiodof30secondsforFacility PerformanceCategoryIIIlocalizersintendedtobe usedforthefullrangeofCategoryIIIoperations (equivalentto4000hoursmeantimebetween outages).10/1/2014 Page 44 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.3.12.4Recommendation.Theprobabilityofnotlosingthe radiatedguidancesignalshouldexceed1 4 10-6inany periodof15 secondsforFacilityPerformanceCategoryI localizers(equivalentto1 000 hoursmeantimebetween outages).Note.Guidancematerialonintegrityandcontinuity of service is given in Attachment C, 2.8.Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 3ReferenceStandardRules project currently addressing this; estimated applicablity early 2011.CAR Part 91 Appendix A, A.9.Not a mandatory requirement for ILS localizer receiving systems fitted to NZ registered aircraft.3.1.4.13.1.4 Interference immunity performance for ILS localizer receiving systemsTheILSlocalizerreceivingsystemshallprovideadequate immunitytointerferencefromtwo-signal,third-order intermodulationproductscausedbyVHFFMbroadcast signals having levels in accordance with the following:2N1 + N2 + 720forVHFFMsoundbroadcastingsignalsintherange107.7 108.0 MHzandfor VHF FM sound broadcasting signals below 107.7 MHz,wherethefrequenciesofthetwoVHFFMsound broadcastingsignalsproduce,withinthereceiver,a two-signal,third-orderintermodulationproductonthedesired ILS localizer frequency.N1andN2arethelevels(dBm)ofthetwoVHFFMsound broadcastingsignalsattheILSlocalizerreceiverinput. Neitherlevelshallexceedthedesensitizationcriteriasetforth in 3.1.4.2.!f=108.1 f1,wheref1isthefrequencyofN1,theVHFFM sound broadcasting signal closer to 108.1 MHz.10/1/2014 Page 45 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 3ReferenceStandardRules project currently addressing this; estimated applicablity early 2011.CAR Part 91 Appendix A, A.9.Not a mandatory requirement for ILS localizer receiving systems fitted to NZ registered aircraft.3.1.4.2TheILSlocalizerreceivingsystemshallnotbedesensitizedin thepresenceofVHFFMbroadcastsignalshavinglevelsin accordance with the following table: Frequency (MHz) Maximum level of unwanted signal at receiver input (dBm)88-102 +15104 +10106 +5107.9 10N1.Therelationshipislinearbetweenadjacentpoints designated by the above frequencies.N2.Guidancematerialonimmunitycriteriatobeused fortheperformancequotedin3.1.4.1 and3.1.4.2 is contained in Attachment C, 2.2.2.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.13.1.5 UHF glide path equipment and associated monitorNote."isusedinthisparagraphtodenotethe nominal glide path angle.3.1.5.1 GeneralTheradiationfromtheUHFglidepathantennasystemshall produceacompositefieldpatternwhichisamplitude modulatedbya90 Hzanda150 Hztone.Thepatternshallbe arrangedtoprovideastraightlinedescentpathinthevertical planecontainingthecentrelineoftherunway,withthe150 Hz tonepredominatingbelowthepathandthe90 Hztone predominatingabovethepathtoatleastanangleequalto 1.75 ".10/1/2014 Page 46 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.2Recommendation.TheILSglidepathangleshouldbe3 degrees.ILSglidepathanglesinexcessof3 degreesshould notbeusedexceptwherealternativemeansofsatisfying obstruction clearance requirements are impracticable.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.2.1The glide path angle shall be adjusted and maintained within:a) 0.075"from"forFacilityPerformanceCategoriesI and II ILS glide paths;b) 0.04"from"forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIII ILS glide paths.N1.Guidancematerialonadjustmentandmaintenance of glide path angles is given in 2.4 of Attachment C.N2.GuidancematerialonILSglidepathcurvature, alignmentandsiting,relevanttotheselectionoftheheight oftheILSreferencedatumisgivenin2.4 ofAttachmentC and Figure C-5.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.3ThedownwardextendedstraightportionoftheILSglidepath shallpassthroughtheILSreferencedatumataheight ensuringsafeguidanceoverobstructionsandalsosafeand efficient use of the runway served.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.4TheheightoftheILSreferencedatumforFacilityPerformance CategoriesIIandIIIILSshallbe15 m(50 ft).Atoleranceof plus 3 m (10 ft) is permitted.10/1/2014 Page 47 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.5Recommendation.TheheightoftheILSreferencedatum forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIILSshouldbe15 m (50 ft). A tolerance of plus 3 m (10 ft) is permitted.N1.InarrivingattheaboveheightvaluesfortheILS referencedatum,amaximumverticaldistanceof5.8 m(19 ft) betweenthepathoftheaircraftglidepathantennaandthe pathofthelowestpartofthewheelsatthethresholdwas assumed.Foraircraftexceedingthiscriterion,appropriate stepsmayhavetobetakeneithertomaintainadequate clearanceatthresholdortoadjustthepermittedoperating minima.N2.Appropriateguidancematerialisgivenin2.4 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.5.1.6Recommendation.TheheightoftheILSreferencedatum forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIILSusedonshort precisionapproachrunwaycodes1 and2 shouldbe12 m (40 ft). A tolerance of plus 6 m (20 ft) is permitted.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.2.13.1.5.2 Radio frequencyTheglidepathequipmentshalloperateintheband328.6 MHz to335.4 MHz.Whereasingleradiofrequencycarrierisused, thefrequencytoleranceshallnotexceed0.005 percent. Wheretwocarrierglidepathsystemsareused,thefrequency toleranceshallnotexceed0.002 percentandthenominalband occupiedbythecarriersshallbesymmetricalaboutthe assignedfrequency.Withalltolerancesapplied,the frequencyseparationbetweenthecarriersshallnotbeless than 4 kHz nor more than 32 kHz.10/1/2014 Page 48 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.2.2Theemissionfromtheglidepathequipmentshallbe horizontally polarized.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.2.3ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIILSglidepath equipment,signalsemanatingfromthetransmittershall containnocomponentswhichresultinapparentglidepath fluctuationsofmorethan0.02 DDMpeaktopeakinthe frequency band 0.01 Hz to 10 Hz.Less protective or partially implemented or not implementedChapter 3ReferenceStandardNote: details of limitations are published in AIPNZ.CAR Part 171. Because of siting problems and terrain limitations some glide paths do not meet Category I facility performance criteria up to 8 degrees in azimuth on each side of the centre line.3.1.5.3.13.1.5.3 CoverageTheglidepathequipmentshallprovidesignalssufficientto allowsatisfactoryoperationofatypicalaircraftinstallationin sectorsof8 degreesinazimuthoneachsideofthecentreline oftheILSglidepath,toadistanceofatleast18.5 km(10 NM) upto1.75 "anddownto0.45 "abovethehorizontalorto suchlowerangle,downto0.30 ",asrequiredtosafeguardthe promulgated glide path intercept procedure.10/1/2014 Page 49 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.3.2Inordertoprovidethecoverageforglidepathperformance specifiedin3.1.5.3.1,theminimumfieldstrengthwithinthis coveragesectorshallbe400 microvoltspermetre(minus95 dBW/m2).ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIglidepaths, thisfieldstrengthshallbeprovideddowntoaheightof30 m (100 ft)abovethehorizontalplanecontainingthethreshold. ForFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIIandIIIglidepaths,this fieldstrengthshallbeprovideddowntoaheightof15 m(50 ft) above the horizontal plane containing the threshold.N1.Therequirementsintheforegoingparagraphsare basedontheassumptionthattheaircraftisheadingdirectly toward the facility.N2.Guidancematerialonsignificantairbornereceiver parameters is given in 2.2 of Attachment C.N3.Materialconcerningreductionincoverageoutside 8 degreesoneachsideofthecentrelineoftheILSglidepath appears in 2.4 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.4.13.1.5.4 ILS glide path structureForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIILSglidepaths,bends intheglidepathshallnothaveamplitudeswhichexceedthe following: Zone Amplitude (DDM_ (95% probability)Outer limit of coverage to ILS Point C0.03510/1/2014 Page 50 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.4.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIIandIIIILSglide paths,bendsintheglidepathshallnothaveamplitudes which exceed the following: Zone Amplitude (DDM_ (95% probability)Outer limit of coverage to ILS Point A0.035ILS Point A to ILS Point B 0.035 at :ILS Point A decreasing at a linear rate to 0.023 at ILS Point BILS Point B to theILS reference datum0.023N1.Theamplitudesreferredtoin3.1.5.4.1 and3.1.5.4.2 aretheDDMsduetobendsasrealizedonthemeanILSglide path correctly adjusted.N2.InregionsoftheapproachwhereILSglidepath curvatureissignificant,bendamplitudesarecalculatedfrom themeancurvedpath,andnotthedownwardextended straight line.N3.GuidancematerialrelevanttotheILSglidepath course structure is given in 2.1.4 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.5.13.1.5.5 Carrier modulationThenominaldepthofmodulationoftheradiofrequency carrierduetoeachofthe90 Hzand150 Hztonesshallbe40 percentalongtheILSglidepath.Thedepthofmodulation shallnotdeviateoutsidethelimitsof37.5 percentto42.5 per cent.10/1/2014 Page 51 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.5.2Thefollowingtolerancesshallbeappliedtothefrequenciesof the modulating tones:a) themodulatingtonesshallbe90Hzand150Hz within2.5percentforFacilityPerformanceCategory I ILS;b) themodulatingtonesshallbe90Hzand150Hz within1.5percentforFacilityPerformanceCategory II ILS;c) themodulatingtonesshallbe90Hzand150Hz within1percentforFacilityPerformanceCategory III ILS;d) thetotalharmoniccontentofthe90Hztoneshallnot exceed10percent:additionally,forFacility PerformanceCategoryIIIequipment,thesecond harmonicofthe90Hztoneshallnotexceed5per cent;e) thetotalharmoniccontentofthe150Hztoneshall not exceed 10 per cent.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceRecommendationCAR Part 171.3.1.5.5.2.1Recommendation.ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryI ILS,themodulatingtonesshouldbe90 Hzand150 Hz within plus or minus 1.5 per cent where practicable.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.5.2.2ForFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIglidepathequipment, thedepthofamplitudemodulationoftheradiofrequency carrieratthepowersupplyfrequencyorharmonics,orat other noise frequencies, shall not exceed 1 per cent.10/1/2014 Page 52 of 262Annex Reference Comments including the reason for the differenceAERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONSAnnex 10, Volume 1, Amendment 89Standard or Recommended PracticeNew ZealandState Legislation, Regulation or Document ReferenceLevel of implementation of SARP'sText of the difference to be notified to ICAOCompliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD)Report on entire AnnexSIXTH EDITION OF VOLUME I- JULY 2006No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.5.3Themodulationshallbephase-lockedsothatwithintheILS halfglidepathsector,thedemodulated90 Hzand150 Hzwave forms pass through zero in the same direction within:a) forFacilityPerformanceCategoriesIandIIILS glide paths: 20 degrees;b) forFacilityPerformanceCategoryIIIILSglide paths: 10 degrees,ofphaserelativetothe150 Hzcomponent,everyhalfcycleof the combined 90 Hz and 150 Hz wave form.Note1.Thedefinitionofphaserelationshipinthis mannerisnotintendedtoimplyarequirementfor measurement of phase within the ILS half glide path sector.Note2.Guidancematerialrelatingtosuchmeasures is given at Figure C-6 of Attachment C.No DifferenceChapter 3ReferenceStandardCAR Part 171.3.1.5.5.3.1Withtwo-frequencyglidepathsystems,3.1.5.5.3 shallapply toeachcarrier.Inaddition,the90 Hzmodulatingtoneofone carriershallbephase-lockedtothe90 Hzmodulatingtoneof theothercarriersothatthedemodulatedwaveformspa


AIP AMDT: AIRAC AMDT EFF Date: 30 Mar 2017 AIRAC

AIP AMDT: AIRAC AMDT EFF Date: 30 Mar 2017 AIRAC

AMDT 36 - AIP

AMDT 36 - AIP

Imdg Code Amdt 33

Imdg Code Amdt 33

New IMDG-Code Amdt. 37-14 CTU-Code - VAG Schweiz · 2016. 10. 17. · IMDG-Code Amdt. 37-14 CTU-Code. August 2014 Irena Meyer 2 IMDG-Code Amdt. 37-14. August 2014 Irena Meyer Teil

New IMDG-Code Amdt. 37-14 CTU-Code - VAG Schweiz · 2016. 10. 17. · IMDG-Code Amdt. 37-14 CTU-Code. August 2014 Irena Meyer 2 IMDG-Code Amdt. 37-14. August 2014 Irena Meyer Teil

CS-25 Amdt 12

CS-25 Amdt 12

KH2066 iss 1 amdt 5

KH2066 iss 1 amdt 5

Amdt 37-14.pdf

Amdt 37-14.pdf

Annex 10 Vol 5 CC Report to Amdt 85

Annex 10 Vol 5 CC Report to Amdt 85

Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD… · 2020. 4. 20. · Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) Report on entire Annex

Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD… · 2020. 4. 20. · Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) Report on entire Annex

Amdt 2042/2003 to Opinion 05/2009

Amdt 2042/2003 to Opinion 05/2009

Strengthening Transparency and Open Access to Govt Amdt Act

Strengthening Transparency and Open Access to Govt Amdt Act

Casr Part 135 Amdt. 8

Casr Part 135 Amdt. 8

AIP Australia 25 MAY 2017 - airservicesaustralia.com · PART 1 – GENERAL (GEN) ... AMDT Date Inserted Inserted by (Init.) 89 112 90 113 91 114 92 115 93 116 ... 1.2 - 21 & 22 24

AIP Australia 25 MAY 2017 - airservicesaustralia.com · PART 1 – GENERAL (GEN) ... AMDT Date Inserted Inserted by (Init.) 89 112 90 113 91 114 92 115 93 116 ... 1.2 - 21 & 22 24

SI 47-01 Amdt

SI 47-01 Amdt

RDSO Specification for LED Based Luminaire (Amdt-2)

RDSO Specification for LED Based Luminaire (Amdt-2)

Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD… · 2019. 10. 7. · Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) Report on entire Annex

Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD… · 2019. 10. 7. · Compliance Checklist (CC) / Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) Report on entire Annex

Spec. of Escalator Amdt. 5

Spec. of Escalator Amdt. 5

CASR Part 107 Amdt. 0 - Small Unmanned Aircraft System

CASR Part 107 Amdt. 0 - Small Unmanned Aircraft System

Specimen AIP Incl Amdt 2

Specimen AIP Incl Amdt 2

March 29, 2010 AMDT Seminar Series Karen K. Leonas

March 29, 2010 AMDT Seminar Series Karen K. Leonas