18/04/2013: Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical

research for the benefits of human beings. While other people argue that it is

wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

________________________________________

It is argued that global population/humans can take advantage of medical experiments

on animals. While reasons can be given to justify this, I would contend that the this

unethical way can be substituted with other measures.

On the one hand, there are those who believe that animals can be used for crucial

scientific research. Firstly, it may be beneficial for researchers to develop medical and

scientific knowledge. A variety of medical discoveries is originated from

experimentations on animals, and the effectiveness of new drugs are is also tested.

Scientists also aim to minimize the suffering that animals with human-like genetic

structures experience. For example, operations on monkeys gain popularity in medical

research. By dint of clinical trials on their bodies, scientists can reachgo to decisions

conclusions about whether new treatments save many patients' life lives and create

have significant impacts on the development of the human race. on ny em c 1 idea,

vy khng c dng Firstly. Mnh expect v d. Nu b , hy dng if not: Without

testing new drugs on animals, no one would be able to confirm the effectiveness of new

drugs on human bodies.

On the other hand, I agree with those who argue that aforementioned experimentations

have several drawbacks. Primarily, on moral ground, all the lives of all creatures should

be respected. Because experiments can be risky to lives, we have no right to deprive

animals of their survival/humans have no right to cause animals to suffer. Another

justification would be that the ecological imbalance may take undesirable influences.

Continuous lines of the failure of medical operations on a certain creature are likely the

precursor of its extinction. There is an inextricably link among animals, and a lack of one

link in food chain tends to result in a globally environmental disaster. As a result, the

mankind's existence seems to be strongly affected. Furthermore, it is advisable for

environment-friendly measures to be applied. For instance, research on man-made

bodies should be taken into consideration. Idea ko ngi c. People often claim that

the extinction of a certain species may lead to an unbalanced ecosystem, but this is not

true. The mass disappearance of the dinosaur had no significant impacts on other

animals on Earth. It even triggered the rise of humans.

In conclusion, while medical trials on animal prompt enormous advantages to human's

life, alternative methods can be manipulated with the aim of creature protection.

(295 words)

Commented [V1]: It is necessary to use / there are those who are in favour of/who advocate the use of animals in

medical research

Commented [V2]: Cm dng cm ny!

Commented [V3]: Ko bm cu hi. However, I side with those who loathe using animals in medical research.

Commented [V4]: Awkward

Commented [V5]: ?