Andrea Mennicken, Michael Power Accounting and...
Transcript of Andrea Mennicken, Michael Power Accounting and...
Andrea Mennicken, Michael Power
Accounting and the plasticity of valuation Book section
Original citation: Originally published in Mennicken, Andrea and Power, Michael (2015) Accounting and the plasticity of valuation. In: Antal , Berthoin Ariane, Hutter, Michael and Stark, David, (eds.) Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 208-228. ISBN 9780198702504 © 2015 Oxford University Press
This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61660/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 1 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
UniversityPressScholarshipOnline
OxfordScholarshipOnline
MomentsofValuation:ExploringSitesofDissonanceArianeBerthoinAntal,MichaelHutter,andDavidStark
Printpublicationdate:2015PrintISBN-13:9780198702504PublishedtoOxfordScholarshipOnline:March2015DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702504.001.0001
AccountingandthePlasticityofValuation
AndreaMennickenMichaelPower
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702504.003.0011
AbstractandKeywords
Thischapterexploresexemplarymomentsofdissonanceandinnovationinaccountingvaluation.Examiningthecasesofvalue-addedaccounting,brandaccounting,fairvalueaccountingandimpairmenttesting,thischaptertracesdebatesandshowthataccountingvaluationis‘plastic’duetobothmethodologicalvariabilityandthedifferentdomainsofworththatgetregisteredwithinaccountingconceptsandtechniques.Accountingisbothapowerfulvehicleofeconomization,valorisingeconomicconstructionsofactorsandthings,andapracticewhichhasbeensignificantlydestabilizedbyprocessesoffinancialization,namelyideasandpracticesoffinancialeconomics.Theplasticityofaccountingshouldnotbereadasweakness.Thischapterconfrontstheapparentparadoxthatthepowerandreachofaccountingasapracticeoforderingandvalorisinghasneverbeengreaterthanatthetimeofcrisiswhenitscorepracticesofmeasurementandvaluationaremostcontestedandplural.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 2 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Keywords:valuation,accounting,financialization,economization,fairvalue,plasticity
IntroductionInthemid1970sanewkindofaccountingstatementappeared—valueaddedaccounting.Promotedbyanaccountingprofessionalbodyin1975whichsoughttoreengineerthecorporatereport(AccountingStandardsSteeringCommittee[ASSC]1975),anumberofcompaniesengagedexperimentallyinproducingvalueaddedaccounts(Burchelletal.1985).Conventionalfinancialstatementswererearrangedsothat“‘valueadded’appearedasanindicatorofthevaluecreatedbytheactivitiesofanenterpriseinanumberofdifferentsites(privatecompanies,newspapers,governmentbodies,tradeunions,employerassociations,professionalaccountancybodies,etc.)”(Burchelletal.1985:385).Statementsofvalueaddedwerecreatedwhichwereaimedat“showinghowthebenefitsoftheeffortsofanenterprisearesharedbetweenemployees,providersofcapital,thestateandreinvestment”(1985:386).AsBurchelletal.(1985:387)highlight,theaccountingcategoryofvalueaddedwasnotonlypromotedasavehicleforinformationdisclosure.Itwasalsoputforwardasabasisfordeterminingrewardsattheleveloftheenterprise,anditappearedonseveraloccasionsinthecontextofpolicydiscussionsconcernedwiththeperformanceofBritishindustry.
Thisaccountinginnovationhaditsconditionsofpossibilityinadistinctivealignmentofthreekeyarenas:professionalconcernswiththenatureofaccounting;macro-economicconcernsaimedatmakingproductivityissuesmorevisible;andthepoliticalconcernsofaleftistgovernmentandthetradeunionswith“industrialdemocracy”(Müller-Jentsch2008).Despitethegreatvariabilityinvalue-addedaccounts,andtheirtechnicalambiguity,theycouldappealsimultaneouslytoanumberofdifferentactorswithdifferentagendas.Insodoing,valueaddedaccountingfunctionedasa(p.209) kindof“boundaryobject”(StarandGriesemer1989).AsStarandGriesemer(1989:393)wouldputit,valueaddedaccountswereplasticenoughtoadapttothedifferentlocalneedsandconstraintsofthepartiesemployingthem.Yet,atthesametime,theywererobustenoughtomaintainacommonidentityacrosssites(1989).However,thevalueaddedaccountingexperimentwasshortlived,andthealignmentofthedifferentarenasbegantobreakup—aprocesscompletedwiththeelectionofMargaretThatcherin1979.1
Thevalueaddedaccountingcaseperfectlyillustratesthethemeofthisvolumeandisanexemplificationofbothnewnessanddissonance.Thetemporarystabilityofvalueaddedaccountingwasitselfconditionedbyafragilealignmentofinterests,whichhungtogetherforawhilewithoutanyexplicitagreementorconsensus.Inthiscaseonemightsaythatmutualmisunderstandingcreatedcoordinationbenefits(Stark2009)—atleastforawhile.Valueaddedaccountingstatementseventuallydisappearedandtheirriseandfallcanberegardedasavaluationeventinaspecifictimeandplace.Theeventrevealsboththetemporalnatureofvaluation,itsdynamicsandcontingentpathovertime,andalsoitsspatiallocalization.Thevalueaddedaccountingeventtookplaceataspecificsite,inaparticularsocialspacemarkingoutadistinctivefieldofoperations.InBurchelletal.’s(1985:400)words,“thenecessityoftalkingaboutvalueaddedinaparticularwayaroseasaresultoftheconditionsthatmadethevalueaddedeventpossible”—conditionswhichBurchelletal.seektoencapsulatewithinthenotionofan“accountingconstellation”
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 3 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
comprisinganetworkofintersectingvaluationpractices,processesandinstitutions(1985).Theconstellationconceptresemblesthatofassemblage(seetheintroductorychapterbyHutterandStarkinthisvolume),2whichalsoreferstoatemporarilystabilizedsetoflinkagesandpracticesformedbetweendiverseactors,agencies,activities,technologiesandideas.
Valueaddedaccountingwasaboveallanattempttorepresentanewkindofobjectinaccountingterms,namelythefirmasacooperativeendeavor.Thisefforttore-valuethenatureofthefirminvolvedtheuseofvalue-addedstatementsnotsimplyasamirrorofactivity,butasamechanismfortheproductionofanalternativereality,albeitwithintheexistingframeof(p.210) standardizedcorporatefinancialreporting.Thatrealityfailedtomaterialize,butthecaseshowshowaccountscanberegardedasconstrainedwaysofproducingfictions.Valueaddedaccountsneededtobegroundedinatransactionalreality—theywerenot“madeup”andneededtopayattentiontoacertaininstitutionalobligation.Buttheywerealsofictionalinthesenseofprojectinganewmodelofeconomiccooperationintheproductionofsurplus.Inthissensewecanthinkofaccountingvaluationashavingaqualityofplasticity,namelybeingbothsimultaneouslystableandunstable.Itisthenatureofthisplasticityanditsdualpropertieswhichisthesubjectofthischapter.
CarruthersandKim(2011:253)arguethat“theplasticityofvaluationis[…]apparentwitheveryaccountingrestatement,butsuchepisodesdonotsimplyreflectvaluation-gone-wrong.Rather,theyrevealhowmuchvalueisacontestedandprovisionaljudgmentwhosecomplexityliesburiedbeneathasurfaceofnumbersandquantification.”Inthischapter,weseektotrackspecificconflictsandtensionswithinaccountingvaluationastheybearonwiderquestionsofvalue.Indeed,wesuggestthatwhilevaluationpracticesmayeventuateinsinglefiguresforfurtherconsumptionandprocessing(Miller1992;Vollmer2007),theyaresustainedbyanapparatuswhichbecomesvisibleintimesofcrisisandwhosecomponentsareinherentlymalleableandcontestable.3Inshort,“economicvaluationprocessesareeminentlycontingent”(Fourcade2011).
Thechapterisstructuredasfollows.Inthenextsectionwediscusstheroleofaccountingintermsofitseconomizing(ÇalışkanandCallon2009,2010)effectsonentitiesandactors.Wedistinguishbetweeneconomizingasageneralmodeofvaluingineconomictermsandfinancializationasadistinctivemodeofeconomizing,drawingontheideasandpracticesoffinancialeconomics.Thisdistinctionenablesustosaythataccountingisplasticinthesensethatitisbothapowerfulandstablevehicleofeconomization,valorizingeconomicconstructionsofactorsandthings,andyetisalsoitselfapracticewhichhasbeensignificantlydestabilizedbyprocessesoffinancialization.
Buildingonourdiscussionoftheeconomizingroleofaccounting,weexplorethreehistoricalmomentsofdissonanceandinnovationinaccountingvaluation.First,weexaminetheeventofbrandaccountinginthe1980sandearly1990sintheUnitedKingdomandinvestigatethestrugglesinvolvedinthecreationofanewobjectofaccountingvaluation.Brandaccountingwasanattempttotransposevaluesfromthemarketingworldintothepre-existingframeofcorporatefinancialstatements,making
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 4 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
brands,as(p.211) “intangible”sourcesofvalue,financiallyre-cognizableinaccounts.Second,wediscussthemorerecentcaseoffairvalueaccountingand,third,relatedeffortstostandardizeandstabilizethepracticeofassetimpairmenttesting.Thecaseoffairvalueaccountinggivesinsightintothedynamicsofanaspirationtomovefroma(historical)cost-basedvaluationsystemtoanaccountingsystembasedon(current)marketprice.Whilefairvalueaccountingaimsatthesystemicfinancializationoffinancialaccounting,weanalyzehowthisprocessrunsupagainstlimitsatthelevelofimpairmenttestingofassetvalues,wherenewfrictionsarecreatedwhichrevealunstableaccountsofworth.
Takingthesethreecaseswiththeopeningdiscussionofvalueaddedprovidesfourhistoricalmomentswhichdemonstratetheplasticityofaccounting,bothasapowerfulforceforeconomizingbutalsoasavehiclefordifferentandoftenfrictionalconceptionsofvalue.Thischaptershowsthataccountingresearchcanaddtothesociologyoffinanceandvaluationstudiesmorebroadlybyjointlynavigatingboththegeneralroleofaccountingasasourceofeconomizationandalsodelineatingthecomplexandcontestednatureofspecificaccountingvaluationpracticesassub-frictionswithinthesegeneraleconomizationprocesses.Inwhatfollows,weseektorevealtheproductivefrictionsinvolvedinaccountingvaluationasdifferentcalculativeframesareused,compared,putinrelationtoeachother(Stark2009,2011),andhowthisuncertaintyisonlyevertemporarilyeffaced.
AccountingandEconomizationTheopeningexampleofvalueaddedaccountingdemonstratesthataccountingstatementsarelessstableanddurablethanmaybecommonlyimagined.Thereisnoinstitutionallogicofaccountingassuch.Accountinghasnoessence,whichwouldtemptustoseeksuchalogic.AsHopwoodputsit,“accountingisnotimbuedwithpurpose,butitcanbemadepurposeful”(Hopwood1992).Yetaccountingprovidesoftenpowerfulnarrativesofeconomiclife(Hines1988)—perhapsthemostpowerful—whichexpandandspillintomanyotherdomainsandorganizations,changingthemintheprocessandchallengingexistingconfigurationsofvalue.Inthisrespectaccountingisbothavalorizingpractice(Vatin2013)whichpromotesandreproducesaconceptionofworth,asmuchasonewhichcontainsvaluations.Regardingtheformer,itisaforcefortheeconomization(seealsoÇalışkanandCallon2009,2010)ofentitiesandactivities.Accountingmakesitpossibletorendertherepresentationofentitiesandactivitiesineconomicterms,eventhoughitdoesthisinmanydifferentways(MillerandPower2013).Itisamechanismbywhichtheeconomizationoforganizationallifebecomeselaboratedandinstitutionalized,andwhichincreasinglyprovidesthedominant(p.212) narrativeofmarketrationalityatanorganizationalandatasocietallevel(CarruthersandEspeland1991;Weber1978),particularlysincethecollapseoftheSovietUnion.4Accountingpracticesoperationalizeandmaterializefictionsofefficiency,economy,“valueformoney”and“value-added”(Hines1988;Miller2001).
Specificaccountingvaluationsofassetsandliabilitiesareintertwinedwiththismoregeneralconstitutiveroleforaccounting.Therolesthataccountingplayswithin
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 5 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
organizationsandsocietyco-emergewiththeeconomizedsocialrelationsthatinturnprovideitsrationalesandthatshapetheorganizationasanaccountingentity(Hopwood1986;MillerandPower2013).While“newmodesoffinancingandtheirrepresentationshavebroughtattentiontoaccounting’sdependencyonlegalpresumptionsoftheboundaryoftheenterprise”(Hopwood1992:127),accountingpracticesalsoenableanentitytobeobservedandconstitutedineconomicterms,particularlyinthepublicsector(Kurunmäki1999;Mennicken2013).
Thataccountingentitiesarefictionalandnetwork-effacingsuperimpositionsoncomplexorganizationsissuggestedbycompetingconceptualizationsofheritageassetsinmuseums(Barton2000;CarnegieandWolnizer1996).Ifmuseumsareregardedasseparateaccountingandthereforeeconomicentities,heritageartefactsare“assets”ontheentity’sbalancesheet,whichcanbevaluedintermsoftheireconomicperformance(e.g.,payingvisitors).Butifmuseumsareregardedasholdingsuchheritageassetsintrustforsocietyandfuturegenerations,thentheyarealsosomethingthattheorganizationowes,inotherwordsaliability.Inshort,onwhichsideofthebalancesheetsomethingappearsisnotanaturalorobviousfact—itmustbeconstructedasanorganizationalfactofaspecifickind(Hines1988)whichinturndependsontheentityconstruct.Inthecaseofheritageassetsthereisapersistenttensionaboutwhatkindofaccountingobjecttheyare,andthistensioncanbetracedtofundamentaldifferencesinordersofworth(BoltanskiandThévenot2006)implicitinentities.
Accountingbestowsapparentprecisionandoperationalrealityoneconomiccategoriesofvalueandtherebyconstitutesapracticalrealmoftheeconomic.AsHopwood(1992:142)putsit,“apracticaleconomyneedstobepositivelyforgedratherthanmerelyrevealed.”Throughthisprocessorganizationalagentsevenacquirenewpreferencesastheyattendtoaccounting(p.213) constructsofeconomicvalue.Fourcade(2011:1766)makesasimilarpointaboutthecontextofeconomicvaluationpractice:“Throughthisinstitutionalizationprocess,itisnotimpossiblethatanewsetof‘individualpreferences’wereactuallymadeendogenoustothetechniquessupposedtorevealthem.”
Thispowerofaccountingtoconstituteandrealizeeconomicconceptionsofentitiesandtheperformanceoforganizationalagents,therebyshapingratherthanreflectingpreferences,doesnotimplyinanywaythataccountingisasimpletransmissionmechanismforeconomicideas.Indeed,thispowerparadoxicallyrevealstheautonomyofaccountinganditsunstablerelationshipwitheconomics:“Thepresentpracticeoftheaccountingcraftcannotbededucedfromeconomicconceptionsofitandeconomicideasforitschangeandreform,althoughoftenarticulated,finditdifficulttobecomeentangledwithacraftthatseemstohaveindependencefromwhatareseenasitsessentialroles”(Hopwood1992:130).Asweshowbelow,thefinancializationofaccounting—theintroductionoffinancialeconomicsintoaccountingandtheincreasingintertwiningofaccountingwiththegoverningofcapitalmarkets—involvesaprogramofstabilizingthisrelationshipandmakingaccountingpracticemuchlessindependentofeconomicideas.Andyet,despitethisprogram,therehasalwaysbeensomethingpermanentlyproblematicanddissonantabouttheeconomizingroleofaccounting.Accountinggiveslife
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 6 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
toeconomicsbutisnotapartofeconomics,despitemanyeffortswithintheacademytopositionitassuch.
Nowhereisthisdissonantrelationshipmoreapparentthaninassetaccounting,whichwediscussfurtherinthecasespresentedbelow.Balancesheetsarehighlystableandinstitutionalizedaccountingforms.Yettheyarealsoimperfectrepresentationsofvalueandhavebeenabattlegroundfortherepresentationofnovelformsofasset,suchasbrands,andliabilities,suchasfuturedecommissioningcostsfornuclearfacilities.Topassthetestofaccountingrecognitionandmakeitintothebalancesheet“valuableassets”likebrandsmustbecapableofbeingcrediblymeasured.Butevenifsomethingdoesmakeitontothebalancesheetatanentrycosttotheentity,historyshowsthatthismaybeapooron-goingreflectionofeconomicvalue.Balancesheetvalueshaveperiodicallybeenchallengedbyalternativemarket-basedvalues(whichwediscussfurtherbelow),therebyunderminingtheeconomizingroleoffinancialaccounting.Withintheseperiodiccrisesofvaluerepresentationandmeasurement,theapparentobjectivityofaccounting—itsauditability(Power1996,1997)—hasplayedaconstrainingroleinthevaluationdeliberationsofanalyticalcommunities,ensuringthatnot“anythinggoes.”Andyet,auditabilityisitselfplasticandadaptableandnetworksofreliabilitycanshift,andhaveshifted,overtime.
Allthismakestherelationshipbetweenaccountingandpresumedcommunitiesofusersaverycomplexonesinceaccountingconstitutesbothobjects(p.214) andsubjectsofvalue,thelatterbeing“accountingusers”astheyarecommonlycalled(Young2006).Thepowerofaccountingresidesinthedemarcationof“calculatingselvesandcalculablespaces”(Miller1992).Presuming,andbringingintoexistence,userswhovalueaccountingisoneofthemostpowerfulaccomplishmentsofaccountinginfrastructure.Yet,exactlyhowaccountingvaluesenterthevaluationprocessesofmarketactorsispoorlyunderstoodeventhoughsomeeffectscanbeobserved(Power2012;Vollmeretal.2009).Therecanbelittledoubtthataccountingplaysanimportantsystemicroleforcapitalmarkets;itisaforcefortheeconomizationoforganizationsandsocietiesevenifthevaluationofassetsremainsabattlegroundforitspractitioners.Forexample,theexperienceoftransitioninRussiaandEasternEuropedemonstratedthecentralityofaccountingtothecreationofnewcapitalmarketsandeconomies,evenasWesternaccountingwasknowntoberiddledwithdifficulties(Mennicken2008,2010).Thisalsosuggeststhatimperfectaccountsofworthmaybehighlyfunctionalfortheconstitutionofmarketsandcertainlypreferabletonothing(DambrinandRobson2011).
Finally,accountinginvolvesthespecialistco-optationandeconomizationofordinarylanguagenotionsof“appreciation,”“depreciation,”“recognition,”“realization”and“goodwill”tonameafewkeyconcepts.Accountingisacontinuousprojectoftryingtofixaclosedtechnicalmeaningfortheseterms,whichalwayshavethepotentialtooverflowandcreateconnectionstomanyotherwaysofaccountingandtootheraccounts.Accountinghasenormouspower;indeedthepowerofthebalancesheetistantamounttoanaestheticizationofeconomicvalue,namelyawayofprovidingapersuasive“spectacleofvalue”which,inthecaseoffinancialinstitutions,asthefinancialcrisishasshown,
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 7 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
becamealsoaspectacleofvaluedestruction.5Throughbalancesheetfocusedaccounting,organizationswhichmaybeordinarilyvaluedasnon-economicinnature,suchasprisonsandhospitals,canbemadeintoeconomicentitieswhose“asset-performance”canbetested,comparedandranked(EspelandandSauder2007;Kurunmäki1999;Mennicken2013).Privatesector-orientedaccountinginstruments,toolsoffinancialreporting,performanceandcostmanagement,havebeenintroducedfromtheprivatesectortothepublicsectortodefineandoperationalize“valueformoney,”tobetterunderstandthelinkbetweenresourcesandoutputs,andtoredefinepublicsectorentitiesascompetitiveunitsresponsiblefortheirownperformancemanagement.Ironically,thebalancesheetcanmakesuchnewlyeconomizedpublicentitiesvisibleasfailingandupforclosure,whilethefailureofprivateentities,suchasbanks,andtheirinterconnectedvulnerabilities,is(p.215) notmadevisible(Miller2008).Thismeansthattheaestheticsofthebalancesheet,itssourceofpower,anditsprojectionoftheautonomouslyperformingentity,isalsohighlyselective,particularlyintermsofthenetworkpropertieswhichitsystematicallyleavesoutofaccount.Thisisshownbythecaseofbrandaccounting,towhichwenowturn.
NewAccountingObjects:BrandsintheLate1980s
Asimplemindcouldhardlyentertainthenotionofintangibleassets.Inachild’stale,wealthiscastles,land,flocks,gold—i.e.physicalthings.Itisalongstepforwardtorealisethattheessenceofwealthistheprospectofbenefits,nottheirphysicalsource.Theaccountantisthusshowinghismaturityifheceasestousethephysicaltestfordecidingwhetheroutlaysfallundertheheadingof“asset”or“expense.”Thecorrecttest,hethenargues,iswhetherornottheoutlayimprovesthefirm’sprospects(whentheoutlookattheyear’sendiscomparedwiththatatitsstart).Tangibilityhasnothingtodowiththistest;heappliesitaliketothecostofalatheandanadvertisingcampaign.
(Baxter1984:218;quotedinNapierandPower1992:85)
BrandaccountingintheUKinthelate1980sandearly1990sisanillustrativecaseofaccountinginstabilitycausedbynewobjectsandacollisionbetweentwomanagerial“ordersofworth”(BoltanskiandThévenot2006)—marketingandaccounting(NapierandPower1992;Power1992).Atthetimetheaccountingauthoritiessoughttoprohibittherecognitionandvaluationofbrandsasassetsinaccountingstatements.Theirgeneralargumentwasthatthevaluationmethodwas“unreliable”andtoosubjective.Furthermore,brandvalueswerenotobservableinliquidmarkets;brandscouldnotbesoldasseparateitemsdistinctfromtheproductstowhichtheywereattached.Forregulators,accountingassetsneededtobeseparableinordertoberepresentedonabalancesheet.Therealsoneededtobeaclearlymeasurableentrycost.Brandsdidnotseemtopasseitheroftheseaccountingtests.
ManyUKcompanieswitheconomicallyvaluablebrandswereopposedtothisview.Howcouldprominentbrandswithconsiderableeconomicvalueforcompaniessimplybeleftoutofaccount?Whatistheroleandvalueofabalancesheetwhenitomitssuchsignificant
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 8 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
assets?Afewcompaniesdecidedtoopposetheaccountingregulatorand,usingvaluationconsultants,theyproceededtovalueboththeiracquiredandself-developedbrandsasseparableassetsonthebalancesheet.Theexternalauditorsofthesecompaniessupportedthisstrategy,andregulators—inparticulartheBritishAccounting(p.216)StandardsCommittee(whichlaterbecametheAccountingStandardsBoard)—foundthemselvesincreasinglyisolated.
Thebrandvaluationmethodsthemselveswerevariedandcontested.Someinvolvedthedevelopmentofanalogieswithmoreliquidassets,suchaspatents.Othersinvolvedeffortstocapitalizeastreamofhypothesizedpremiumprofitsattachedtothebrand.Yetbelowthesurfaceofmostofthesemethodstherewasusuallysomekindofimplicitdiscountedcashflowmodelandatechnicalchallengetoidentifytheseparablecashflowsin“jointassets”(NapierandPower1992).Inmanyways,themethodswereunsurprising,yettwodifferentgroups—accountingpreparersandregulators—couldcometoopposedviewsabouttheirreliability.Thetemporaryalliancebetweenmarketing-basedknowledgeandthepro-brandcapitalizerswonthedayandtheeffectwastoreinforcethesolidityandreliabilityofbrandvalues.Insomesensebrandsexistedasobjectsbeforetheywereaccountedfor.Yettheycametohaveincreasedinstitutionalcredibilitybecausetheywereusedforbalancesheetpurposes.Bybeingpartofaccountingstatements,brandsbecamepartofanewandpowerful“orderofworth”(BoltanskiandThévenot2006).6Thisinturnsupportedtheideaofa“market”forbrandsalthoughtheywererarelytradedseparatelyfromtheunderlyingassets.
Thebrandaccountingcaseshowshowthecredibilityandreliabilityofaneconomicvaluationmethodologyisnotaninherentfeatureofthatmethodologybutdependsonnetworksofsocialsupport(Power1992)andconfigurationsofattachment(Hennion2007).Fromthispointofview,valuationpracticeisembeddedinanapparatuswhichinvolvestheconstitutionoftheobjectsthemselves.Seeminglyverytechnicalprocessesofvaluationandevaluation(auditingandothertests)co-produceboththeaccountoftheobjectandtheobjectitself.Itfollowsthatdisputesabouttechniquesareoftenalsodisputesabouttheobjectbeingvalued.Thiswasevidentinthecaseofbrandswherethecontestationwasonlypartlyaboutthereliabilityofavaluationtechniquebutwasalsoaboutthenatureofbrandsthemselves.Foraccountingstandardsettersatthetimebrandshadaflimsyreality.Yetformarketingspecialistsandwithincapitalmarketsmoregenerallytheywerefarfromflimsy—indeedtheywereasourceofcomparativeadvantageforthefirmswhichownedthem.Itwasarguedthatfailingtoreflectbrandsasassetsonthebalancesheetcouldleadtofirmsbeingundervaluedandvulnerabletotakeover—andthisbeliefmotivatedtheirvaluationandcapitalization.Thebrandscaseshowshowtheplasticityofaccounting—itscontingent(p.217) combinationofstabilityandinstabilityemergesfromboththevariableandcontestednatureofvaluationtechnologiesandalsothedifferent,andoftenconflictual,ordersofworthandtheirrespectiveobjectsofattachmentthatgetregistered(andde-registered)throughthesemethodologiesovertime.7Thisplasticityisevenmoreevidentintherelatedcasesoffairvalueaccountingandimpairmenttestingpractice.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 9 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
“Fair”ValueandtheFinancializationofAccountingItistemptingtoimaginethattheessenceofaccountingismeasurement.Yetthequestionofmeasurementisalsoasourceofinstability(Power2012).Measurementconventionsforfinancialaccountinghavechangedovertime(seethebrandandvalueaddedaccountingcasesdiscussedabove)anddifferentmeasurementconventionscoexistinthesamefinancialstatements.Theearliestandsimplestmeasurementmethodwasthatofan“entry”,orahistorical,costbasis.Thisisnotavaluationmethodascommonlyunderstoodbutitisabasisforrecordingavalueintheaccountsbasedontheacquisitioncostsofanasset.Inthecaseofassetsothermethodswerealsoused,forexampletoreflectdifferentpossiblemanagerialintentions(namelytoreplace,touseortosell).Historyshowsthatamixtureofmeasurementmethodshasbeentoleratedformanyyearsbyaccountingpractitionersandregulatorsalike.Indeed,whatneedstobehighlightedistheeclecticnatureofaccountingmeasurementandvaluations.Unpackingtheeclecticnatureofaccountingconceptsandmethodologiescontributesnotonlytoabetterunderstandingofhowaccountingworks;“italsocontributesmorebroadlytothesociologyofeconomicvaluation,bysheddinglightonthedifferentformsofcalculabilityengrainedintheestablishmentofmarket-economiclossandvalue”(MennickenandMillo2013:1).
“Fair”valuemeasurementinaccounting,atleastonthesurface,disturbedthispluralisticworld(LauxandLeuz2009).Havingexistedasacategoryformanyyears,overthefirstdecadeofthetwenty-firstcentury,therewasanambitiontoexpanditsscaleandknowledgebase.Definedas“thepricethatwouldbereceivedtosellanassetorpaidtotransferaliabilityinanorderlytransactionbetweenmarketparticipantsatthemeasurementdate”(International(p.218) AccountingStandardsBoard[IASB]2011:A491),fairvalueisbasedonanexitpriceconcept.Thenotionoffairvaluemovesattentionawayfromanasset’s“valueinuse,”i.e.,anasset’scontributiontothecreationofvaluewithintheorganization,establishedviamanagerialjudgment,toits“exchangevalue,”i.e.,itscurrentmarketprice,establishedviaanactualorimaginedmarkettransaction.8Inotherwords,theconceptoffairvalueassumesanintentiontosell,evenwherethisisnotthecaseempirically.Furthermore,theconnotationoffairnessimpliesfreedomfrombiasandimpartiality.Inthisrespect,fairvalueisbothavaluationmethodandalsoanideaaboutwhatassetpricesshouldbe.Itisforthisreasonthatcritics(Bromwich2007;Ronen2008)suggestthatfairvaluesareoftenhypotheticalandimaginativeconstructsofvalueratherthanrepresentationsofactualmarketprice.However,thisfictionalityistheverysourceofthepoweroffairvalue.Justasvalueaddedaccountinginthe1970swasinessenceafictionintendedtoreconstitutetheenterpriseasacooperativeendeavor,sodoesfairvalueaccountingseektomakefirmsmoremarket-facing,regardlessofwhetherthemarketsarerealorimagined.Foritsadvocates,fairvaluewasanideamotivatingthealignmentoffinancialaccountingwithcapitalmarkets,andincreasingitsrelevanceforcapitalmarketinvestors(Badertscheretal.2010;Barthetal.2001).Theadvocateswerepowerfulbecausefinancialassets,suchasderivativesandotherfinancialinstruments,ratherthantraditionalassets,suchasmachinery,increasinglycomprisedalargerproportionofmanybalancesheets.Inotherwords,changesandtensionsintheaccountingmodelofvalue—fromhistoricalcosttofair
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 10 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
value,fromorganizationallyfocusedusevaluetomarket-basedexchangevalue—wereimplicatedinchangesinthewidereconomy(EspelandandHirsch1990;PerryandNölke2006)andineconomicdiscourse(Burchelletal.1985;Hopwood1992;Miller1991).
Theriseoffairvalueaccountingwasenabledbyanincreaseintheculturalauthorityoffinancialeconomics(Whitley1986)andbytheproblemofaccountingfor,andrepresentingtherisksofderivatives(e.g.,options,swaps,convertiblebonds)(Morley2011;Power2010;Young1996).Thesenewderivativefinancialinstrumentswereachallengetoexistingpluralmeasurementconventionsinaccountingandwereanobviousapplicationforfairvaluemethods.Thesuccessfulapplicationoffairvaluesinthiscontextgaveasmallgroupofstandardsettersconfidencetoexpandtheirusageinotherareas.Fromthispointofview,fairvalueaccountingwasmorethanamethodbutalsoastakefortheprofessionalidentityofaccountingstandardsettersand(p.219) achallengetoexistingformsofaccountingknowledgebecauseoftheneedformoreengagementwithcorporatefinanceandfinancialeconomics(Power2010;Young1996).Today,the“fair”valuationofassetshasbecomeaspecializedactivity,andaccountantshavenonecessarymonopoly.Newcentersofvaluationhavebeeninvented,suchastheInternationalValuationsStandardsCommittee(IVSC).Valuationhasnotbecomemorescientificorlessjudgmentladenasaresult—ratheraccountantsarenolongernecessarilyincontrolofvalue.9
Thebattlegroundforthefairvaluedebatewas,andremains,thebalancesheet,itselfadeeplyinstitutionalizedandcompressedrepresentationofanorganizationasnotedabove.Thepromotionoffairvaluemeasurementofassetsandliabilitieswasineffectachallengetothelegallogicofthebalancesheetanditsgroundinginspecificjurisdictions.Thefairvalueprogramrepresentedade-localizationofthebalancesheetandgreateralignmentwithglobalcapitalmarkets.Itpromotedthefinancializationofaccountingpractices—theintegrationofvaluationtechniquesderivedfromfinancialeconomicsintoaccountingmeasurementsandtheriseofdefinitionsofvaluederivedfromcapitalmarketsandcapitalmarket-basedexchange(Dore2008;FroudandWilliams2001;Krippner2005;PerryandNölke2006).
Yet,thefinancializationofaccountingthroughfairvaluedidnottaketheformofasweepingcolonizingprocessresultinginanewmeasurementstability.Indeeditwasasourceofconsiderabledissonancewithintheaccountingprofession,andbeyond.10Thepressuretoexpandtheapplicationoffairvalueswithinaccountingwasmorethevisionofasmallsub-setofaccountingpolicymakersandacademicsratherthananyfailureofthemarketforaccountinginformation(Bignonetal.2009;Botzem2012;Power2010).Indeed,itcanbereadascontestwithintheaccountingpolicyworldbetweenmeasurementidealistsandpragmatists(Power2010;Walton2004;Whittington2008).Theearlysuccessbytheidealistsinvolvedanewconceptionofaccountingreliability.Inplaceoftransactionalpragmatismgroundedinthecashrealizabilityofrecordedprofits,fairvalueenthusiastsappealedtothereliabilityofvaluationmodelsderivedandadaptedfromfinancialeconomics.Yetthisassemblageofactorsandideaswhichgavefairvalueaccountingitsoriginalboost(p.220) haschangedsignificantlysincethefinancialcrisis
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 11 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
(LauxandLeuz2009).Notonlyhavekeyfigureswhopromotedfairvalueinaccountingstandardsetting,likeSirDavidTweedie,formerChairmanoftheIASB,movedon,buttheauthorityoffinancialmarketswastemporarilydamaged.In2014,fairvalueremainsstrongbutlessimperialisticthanhitherto,andwehaveseenareturntomorevaluationpluralism.Thisisparticularlyevidentinthetestingofassetvaluationsforimpairmentwhichweconsidernext.
TestingValuations:AssetImpairment11Combiningmanagerialandmarket-basedvaluationapproaches,impairmenttestspositionaccounting,andeconomicvaluationmorebroadly,attheinterfacebetweenmarketsandorganizations(MennickenandMillo2013;butseealsoHuikkuetal.2012).Impairmenttestsareaccountingvaluationsthatseektoestablishwhetherornotanasset’srecoverableamounthasfallenbelowitscarryingamount(i.e.bookvalue)duetoobsolescence,damage,orafallinmarketvalue.Impairmenttestsinvolveboththeapplicationofmarket-basedvaluationapproachesbasedonaconceptof“valueinexchange”(fairvalue)andalso“valueinuse”calculationsbasedonmanagerialestimatesofthediscountedfuturecashflowsthatanassetisexpectedtogenerateforitsowner.
Impairmenttestsarecontrivedandstructuredde-stabilizationsofvalue.Impairmentcalculationsrequiremanagers(andaccountants)toputpreviousvaluationsintoquestion.Insodoing,theplasticityofaccountingvaluationsbecomesapparent.ParaphrasingCarruthersandKim(2011:253),wecansaythatimpairmentlossesdonotsimplyreflectaccountingvaluationsgonewrong.Rather,impairmenttests“revealhowmuchvalueisacontestedandprovisionaljudgementwhosecomplexityliesburiedbeneathasurfaceofnumbersandquantification”(2011).Impairmentofassets,intheformoftherequirementtowritedownassetswhentheirvaluetothebusinessislowerthantheirbookvalue,hasbeeninexistenceformorethan100years.Write-downrequirementsareengrainedinthelong-standingaccountingprinciplesofconservatismandprudence(Dicksee1892).Yet,itwasonlyinthelate1980sthatsuchwrite-downrequirementsstartedtoberedefinedandregulatedintermsofstandardizedimpairmenttests(MennickenandMillo2013).Inshort,anapparatusforimpairmenttestinginvolvingstandardsandregulationwasconstructed,butthatveryconstructionisfoundedon,andreveals,thelatentdissonancecontainedinanyaccountingvaluation.(p.221) Liketheriseoffairvalueaccounting,thenewnessofimpairmenttestingdidnotinvolvetheconstructionofnewaccountingobjects,asinthecaseofvalueaddedorbrands.Ratheritinvolvedtheexpansioninscaleandscopeofpracticestoassurevaluations.Onemightputitlikethisinthecontextofthisvolume:thegrowthandelaborationoftestsofaccountingvaluessimultaneouslyrevealsthatthesevaluesareamatterofcontestedcollectivetasteorjudgment.FollowingHennion(2007andinthisvolume),whodrawsourattentiontotheimportanceofacontinuouselaborationofproceduresthatputtastetothetest,wearguethataccountingvaluations,likewinetastingandartisticevaluation,arealsocomplex,distributedcollectiveendeavors,shapednotsomuchbythemechanicalfollowingofsomealgorithm,butbyemotion,ritualandtherelianceonothers—theirjudgment,experienceandpreferences(seealsoBoedkerandChua2013;Pentland1993).
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 12 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Theconceptualunderpinningsandvaluationmethodologiesunderlyingstandardizedimpairmenttestsarenotsingularandstable.Impairmenttestingrulesembracedifferentcalculativecomponentsandvaluationmethodologies,partlydrawingonconceptsandtechniquesderivedfromfinancialeconomics(e.g.,theconceptofmarketrelevance,fairvalueanddiscountedcashflowanalyses),partlydrawingonconceptsandtechniquesderivedfrommoretraditionalaccountingpractice(e.g.,theprincipleofcost-or-less,thenotionofcash-generatingunit,andfirm-based,ratherthanmarket-oriented,notionsofdeprivalvalue).12Impairmenttestsrequiremanagers(andaccountants)tocompareandcontrastdifferentvaluationmethodologies:themarket-basedfairvalueofanassetoragroupofassets(i.e.theamountatwhichanassetcouldbedisposedof,lessanydirectsellingcosts)andthe“valueinuse”ofanasset(i.e.itsvalue—definedintermsofusefulness—fortheowningorganization,e.g.,intermsoffuturecashflowsthatcanbegeneratedbytheassetinquestion).13
Throughimpairmenttests,managersarebeingmadeawareoftheimportanceofmarketsandoftheimplicationofmarket-basedinformationinorganizationalimpairmentvaluations.Butatthesametime,market-basedinformationbecomesmoremanagerialized(MennickenandMillo2013).Althoughimpairmenttests,likefairvalueaccounting,shiftattentionfromanotionofreliabilityrootedintheobjectivityofhistoricalcosttoa(p.222)notionofreliabilityrootedinfuture-orientedmanagerialestimationsandmarket-basedvaluationexpertise(Power2010),itwouldbewrongtoviewthisprocessoffinancializationasaone-waystreet,inwhichfinanceandfinancialmarketscaptureandcolonizeaccountingvaluationsandorganizations.Bothmanagerialandmarket-basedordersofworthareco-transformedinaprocessofdisciplineddissonancebetweenthem.14
Furthermore,itisimportanttonotethatimpairmenttestsarenoteasilyputintopractice(Huikkuetal.2012).Ratherthancontributingtothe“doingofaccounting,”impairmenttestsaskmanagers,accountantsandauditorsto“undoaccounting”andtogetuncomfortablewiththenumberstheyproduce.AsMennickenandMillo(2013:8)highlight,althoughpresentedintheformofastandardizedalgorithm,impairmenttestsare“anti-formulaic.”Thedissonantnatureofimpairmenttestsrequiresthatvaluationismultipliedandaccountingrepresentationdestabilized(seealsoHuikkuetal.2012).Inessence,impairmentrulescarrywiththemthepotentialforinducingmorereflexivityandthereforenoveltyaboutthepositioningoforganizationsvis-à-vismarkets.
ThePlasticityofValuationThischapterhasprogressedthroughfour“moments”inthehistoryofaccountingandvaluewhichareclearly“sitesofdissonance.”Webeganinthelate1970swiththeshort-livedappearanceofvalueaddedstatements.Thenweconsideredthebrandaccountingcontroversyinthelate1980s.Thirdlywediscussedthecontroversialriseoffairvalueaccountingandhowthisconstitutedthefinancializationoffinancialaccounting.Fourthly,thecaseofimpairmenttestingrevealsthelimitsofthisfinancializationprocessandtheessentiallypluralisticandplasticnatureofaccountingvalues.Allfourcasesoraccounting“moments”suggestthatvaluationpracticeswithinaccountingarefarfrombeingthecool
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 13 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
applicationofcalculativetechnique.Suchtechniqueshavecomplexcontingenthistoriesofinstitutionalization,andtheydependonaweboftacitnon-oppositionfromavarietyofactorswhoseordersofwortharefarfrombeingaligned.Evenatthespecificpracticelevelwehaveshownhowtheproductionofparticularvaluationsisthetemporaryoutcomeofanetworkofactors,andaformofdistributedcognitionwithpluralattachments,whichisnotnecessarilyfullycoordinated.Thelimitedstabilityofthisnetworkisquicktorevealitselfatmomentsofinnovationandrelatedconflictanduncertainty.
(p.223) Inadditionwehavesuggestedthatvaluationisalsoworkinvolvingthemultiplicationandtransportationofinscriptions(LatourandWoolgar1979;Robson1992)aswellasactsofjudgmentandinterpretationatcrucialjunctures.Thisworkmoreorlesshangstogether,andmoreorlessproducesstability.Intimesofgreatinstability,suchaswesawinthefinancialcrisisof2008onwards,theworkofaccountingvaluationintensifies.Forexample,thevaluationoffinancialassetswithquestionableliquidityduringtheheightofthefinancialcrisisshowshowtheextendedelaborationofinscriptionsisnecessarytoanchorjudgmentsaboutvalue,essentialfictions,inamaterialsubstrate,notleastforthepurposesofmakingsuchvaluationsauditable,traceableandcomfortableagain(Power2013).Indeed,asvaluationscometoberecognizedasessentiallyplasticandcontestableweobserveanintensificationofevidentiaryprocesses.Actorsinvolvedinvaluationworkincreasinglyrecordanddefendwhattheydo.Keyvaluejudgmentsmustbearticulatedanddefended.Forumsexist,suchasriskandauditcommitteesinsideorganizations,wheresuchjudgmentsarechallengedandmustbejustified.Inthisrespectjudgment,calculationandauditabilityarenecessarilyintertwinedintheproductionofaccountingvalues.
Thisplasticityofaccountingvaluationhasbroaderimplicationsforvaluationstudiesandsocialstudiesoffinance.Ourargumentscutacrossfinanceandaccounting(Power2012;Vollmeretal.2009),andwesuggestanunderexploreddynamicwithinbroadargumentsaboutfinancialization.Wehavearguedthattheeconomizingroleofaccountingisnotinvariant.Financialaccountingasadeeplyinstitutionalizedpracticewithincapitalmarketshasundergoneprofoundchangesandchallengestoitsinternallogicororientation,becomingprogressivelyfinancializedbystages.Byprioritizingbalancesheetelementsoverincomestatementsintheearly1970s,theUS-AmericanFinancialAccountingStandardsBoard(FASB)createdagatewayformeasurementpracticesinformedbyfinancialeconomics.Asthelattergrewinlegitimacyandwasvalidated,financialaccountingwaseffectively“financialized”(Morley2011),butthisislessastoryofinevitableprogressinvaluationmethodssomuchasthetemporarytriumphofonevaluecenter—thecapitalmarkets—overanother—thejudgmentsofmanagement.
Itisintheplayingoutofvalueandvaluationclasheswithinaccountingthatamoraleconomyofvaluationingeneralbecomesvisible.Whereisthegroundofvalue?Whosevaluecounts?Isittheworkofmultipleactorsonthecrowdedvirtualtradingfloor,whosescreen-basedtechnologiesfascinatesociologistsoffinance?Orisittothemanagersoffirmswithintimateknowledgeoftheirproducts?Thisisatension,whichhas
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 14 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
beenaddressedbymanyscholarsofeconomiclife,butwehavesuggestedthatthisisalsoadramaplayedoutwithintherealmofmarket-orientedvaluationpracticesthemselves,andrevealedbyourfourmomentsinaccountinghistory.
(p.224) Toconclude:Wehavearguedthataninvestigationofthemultipleformsofcalculabilityengrainedineconomicvaluationandmeasurementtechnologies,suchasbrandaccountingandimpairmenttests,helpstogettogripswiththe“plasticityofvaluation”(CarruthersandKim2011)and“theproductivefrictions”(Stark2009,2011)involvedasdifferentcalculativeframesareused,compared,andputinrelationtoeachother.Theplasticityofaccountingvaluationunderwritesthepowerofaccountingandshouldnotbereadasweakness.Indeed,associologistsweneedtoworkhardertounderstandhowthesystemicreachofaccountingasapracticeoforderingandvalorizinghasneverbeengreateratatimewhencorepracticesofmeasurementandvaluationaremostcontestedandplural,andevervulnerabletothedissonantforceofinnovation.
References
Bibliographyreferences:
AccountingStandardsSteeringCommittee[ASSC](1975).TheCorporateReport.London:ASSC.
Badertscher,B.,Burks,J.,andEaston,P.(2010).FairValueAccounting,Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments,andtheFinancialCrisis.TheAcccountingReview87(1):59–90.
Barth,M.E.,Beaver,W.,andLandsman,W.(2001).TheRelevanceoftheValueRelevanceLiteratureforFinancialAccountingStandardSetting:AnotherView.JournalofAccountingandEconomics31(1–3):77–104.
Barton,A.D.(2000).AccountingforPublicHeritageFacilities—AssetsorLiabilitiesoftheGovernment?Accounting,AuditingandAccountabilityJournal13(2):219–236.
Baxter,W.T.(1984).InflationAccounting.Deddington:PhilipAllan.
Bignon,V.,Biondi,Y.,andRagot,X.(2009).AnEconomicAnalysisofFairValue:AccountingasaVectoroftheCrisis:Prisme,15,CournotCentreforEconomicStudies.(accessedFebruary5,2014)
Boedker,C.andChua,W.F.(2013).AccountingasanAffectiveTechnology:AStudyofCirculation,AgencyandEntrancement.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety38(4):245–267.
Boltanski,L.andThévenot,L.(2006).OnJustification.EconomiesofWorth.PrincetonandOxford:PrincetonUniversityPress.
Botzem,S.(2012).ThePoliticsofAccountingRegulation:OrganizingTransnationalStandardSettinginFinancialReporting.Cheltenham:EdwardElgar.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 15 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Bromwich,M.(2007).FairValues,ImaginaryPricesandMysticalMarkets.InP.Walton(ed.),TheRoutledgeCompaniontoFairValueandFinancialReporting.London:Routledge,46–68.
Burchell,S.,Clubb,C.,andHopwood,A.G.(1985).AccountinginitsSocialContext:TowardsaHistoryofValueAddedintheUnitedKingdom.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety10(4):381–413.
Çalışkan,K.andCallon,M.(2009).Economization,part1:ShiftingAttentionfromtheEconomyTowardsProcessesofEconomization.EconomyandSociety38(3):369–398.
Çalışkan,K.andCallon,M.(2010).Economization,part2:AResearchProgrammefortheStudyofMarkets.EconomyandSociety39(1):1–32.
Carnegie,G.D.andWolnizer,P.W.(1996).EnablingAccountabilityinMuseums.Accounting,AuditingandAccountabilityJournal9(5):84–99.
Carruthers,B.G.andEspeland,W.N.(1991).AccountingforRationality:Double-EntryBookkeepingandtheRhetoricofEconomicRationality.AmericanJournalofSociology97(1):31–69.
Carruthers,B.G.andKim,J.-C.(2011).TheSociologyofFinance.AnnualReviewofSociology37:239–259.
Dambrin,C.andRobson,K.(2011).TracingPerformanceinthePharmaceuticalIndustry:Ambivalence,OpacityandthePerformativityofFlawedMeasures.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety36(7):428–455.
Dicksee,L.R.(1892).Auditing:APracticalManualforAuditors.London:Gee.
Dore,R.(2008).FinancializationoftheGlobalEconomy.IndustrialandCorporateChange17(6):1097–1112.
Espeland,W.N.andHirsch,P.(1990).OwnershipChanges,AccountingPracticesandtheRedefinitionoftheCorporation.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety15(1–2):77–96.
Espeland,W.N.andSauder,M.(2007).RankingsandReactivity:HowPublicMeasuresRecreateSocialWorlds.AmericanJournalofSociology113(1):1–40.
Fourcade,M.(2011).CentsandSensibility:EconomicValuationandtheNatureof“Nature.”AmericanJournalofSociology116(6):1721–1777.
Froud,J.andWilliams,K.(2001).ANewBusinessModel?TheCapitalMarketandtheNewEconomy.EconomyandSociety30(4):467–503.
Georgiou,O.andJack,L.(2011).InPursuitofLegitimacy:AHistoryBehindFairValueAccounting.TheBritishAccountingReview43(4):311–323.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 16 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Hennion,A.(2007).ThoseThingsThatHoldUsTogether:TasteandSociology.CulturalSociology1(1):97–114.
Hines,R.D.(1988).FinancialAccounting:InCommunicatingReality,WeConstructReality.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety13(2):251–262.
Hopwood,A.G.(1986).ManagementAccountingandOrganizationalAction:AnIntroduction.InM.BromwichandA.G.Hopwood(eds.),ResearchandCurrentIssuesinManagementAccounting.London:Pitman,9–30.
Hopwood,A.G.(1992).AccountingCalculationandtheShiftingSphereoftheEconomic.EuropeanAccountingReview1(1):125–143.
Huikku,J.,Mouritsen,J.,andSilvola,H.(2012).TheProductionofNumbersabouttheFuture:TheCaseofImpairmentTestingofGoodwill,IPAConferenceCardiff,July11–13,2012.
Hutter,M.(2010).Wertwechselstrom:ZumVerhältniszwischenökonomischemundästhetischemWert[AlternatingCurrentsintheCreationofValue:OntheRelationshipbetweenEconomicandAestheticValue].InM.Hutter(ed.),Wertwechselstrom:TextezuKunstundWissenschaft.Hamburg:FundusPhiloFineArts,241–278.
InternationalAccountingStandardsBoard(IASB)(2011).InternationalFinancialReportingStandard13:FairValueMeasurement.London:IASB.
Krippner,G.R.(2005).TheFinancializationoftheAmericanEconomy.Socio-EconomicReview3(2):173–208.
Kurunmäki,L.(1999).MakinganAccountingEntity:TheCaseoftheHospitalinFinnishHealthCareReforms.EuropeanAccountingReview8(2):219–237.
Latour,B.andWoolgar,S.(1979).LaboratoryLife:TheConstructionofScientificFacts.BeverlyHills:Sage.
Laux,C.andLeuz,C.(2009).TheCrisisofFairValueAccounting:MakingSenseoftheRecentDebate.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety34(6–7):826–834.
Macve,R.(2010).TheCaseforDeprivalValue.Abacus46(1):111–119.
Mennicken,A.(2008).ConnectingWorlds:TheTranslationofInternationalAuditingStandardsintoPost-SovietAuditPractice.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety33(4–5):384–414.
Mennicken,A.(2010).FromInspectiontoAuditing:AuditandMarketsasLinkedEcologies.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety35(3):334–359.
Mennicken,A.(2013).“TooBigtoFailandTooBigtoSucceed”:AccountingandPrivatisationinthePrisonServiceofEnglandandWales.FinancialAccountabilityand
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 17 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Management29(2):206–226.
Mennicken,A.andMillo,Y.(2013).TestingValues:Financialization,OrganizationandtheEmergenceofImpairmentRules.WorkingPaper.LondonSchoolofEconomicsandPoliticalScience.
Miller,P.(1991).AccountingInnovationBeyondtheEnterprise:ProblematizingInvestmentDecisionsandProgrammingEconomicGrowthintheU.K.inthe1960s.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety16(8):733–762.
Miller,P.(1992).AccountingandObjectivity:TheInventionofCalculatingSelvesandCalculableSpaces.AnnalsofScholarship9(1–2):61–86.
Miller,P.(2001).GoverningbyNumbers:WhyCalculativePracticesMatter.SocialResearch68(2):379–396.
Miller,P.(2008).WhenMarketsandModelsFail:RethinkingRisk,RegulationandtheState.RiskandRegulation.SpecialIssueonFinancialCrisisDecember:6–7.
Miller,P.andO’Leary,T.(1994).TheFactoryasLaboratory.ScienceinContext7(3):469–496.
Miller,P.andPower,M.(2013).Accounting,Organizing,andEconomizing:ConnectingAccountingResearchandOrganizationTheory.AcademyofManagementAnnals7(1):557–605.
Morley,J.(2011).SequencesofChangeinFinancialReporting:TheInfluenceofFinancialEconomicsinFinancialReportingPractice.PhDThesis,LondonSchoolofEconomicsandPoliticalScience,London.
Müller-Jentsch,W.(2008).IndustrialDemocracy:HistoricalDevelopmentandCurrentChallenges.ManagementRevue19(4):260–273.
Muniesa,F.,Millo,Y.,andCallon,M.(2007).AnIntroductiontoMarketDevices.InM.Callon,Y.Millo,andF.Muniesa(eds.),MarketDevices.Oxford:Blackwell,1–12.
Napier,C.andPower,M.(1992).ProfessionalResearch,LobbyingandIntangibles:AReviewEssay.AccountingandBusinessResearch23(89):85–95.
Penman,S.(2007).IsFairValueaPlusorMinus?AccountingandBusinessResearch37(4):33–44.
Pentland,B.T.(1993).GettingComfortablewiththeNumbers:TheMicroProductionofMacroOrder.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety18(7–8):605–620.
Perry,J.andNölke,A.(2006).ThePoliticalEconomyofInternationalAccountingStandards.ReviewofInternationalPoliticalEconomy13(4):559–586.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 18 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Power,M.(1992).ThePoliticsofBrandAccountingintheUnitedKingdom.EuropeanAccountingReview1(1):39–68.
Power,M.(1996).MakingThingsAuditable.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety21(2–3):289–315.
Power,M.(1997).TheAuditSociety:RitualsofVerification.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Power,M.(2010).FairValueAccounting,FinancialEconomicsandtheTransformationofReliability.AccountingandBusinessResearch40(3):197–210.
Power,M.(2012).AccountingandFinance.InK.Knorr-CetinaandA.Preda(eds.),TheOxfordHandbookoftheSociologyofFinance.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,293–314.
Power,M.(2013).OrganizationsandAuditTrails.WorkingPaper:LondonSchoolofEconomicsandPoliticalScience.
Robson,K.(1992).AccountingNumbersas“Inscription”:ActionataDistanceandtheDevelopmentofAccounting.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety17(7):685–708.
Ronen,J.(2008).ToFairValueorNottoFairValue:ABroaderPerspective.Abacus44(2):181–208.
Smith,A.(1776/1970).AnInquiryintotheNatureandCausesoftheWealthofNations.Harmondsworth:Penguin.
Star,S.L.andGriesemer,J.R.(1989).InstitutionalEcology,“Translations”andBoundaryObjects:AmateursandProfessionalsinBerkeley’sMuseumofVertebrateZoology,1907–39.SocialStudiesofScience19(3):387–420.
Stark,D.(2009).TheSenseofDissonance:AccountsofWorthinEconomicLife.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.
Stark,D.(2011).What’sValuable?InJ.BeckertandP.Aspers(eds.),TheWorthofGoods.ValuationandPricingintheEconomy.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,319–338.
Vatin,F.(2013).ValuationasEvaluatingandValorizing.ValuationStudies1(1):31–50.
Vollmer,H.(2007).HowtoDoMoreWithNumbers:ElementaryStakes,Framing,Keying,andtheThree-dimensionalCharacterofNumericalSigns.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety32(6):577–600.
Vollmer,H.,Mennicken,A.,andPreda,A.(2009).TrackingtheNumbers:AcrossAccountingandFinance,OrganizationsandMarkets.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety34(5):619–637.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 19 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
Walton,P.(2004).IAS39:WhereDifferentAccountingModelsCollide.AccountinginEurope1(1):5–16.
Walton,P.(2007).TheNatureofFairValue.InP.Walton(ed.),TheRoutledgeCompaniontoFairValueandFinancialReporting.London:Routledge,3–8.
Weber,M.(1922/1978).EconomyandSociety.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Whitley,R.(1986).TheTransformationofBusinessFinanceintoFinancialEconomics:TheRolesofAcademicExpansionandChangesinU.S.CapitalMarkets.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety11(2):171–192.
Whittington,G.(2008).FairValueandthelASB/FASBConceptualFrameworkProject:AnAlternativeView.Abacus44(2):139–168.
Young,J.J.(1996).InstitutionalThinking:TheCaseofFinancialInstruments.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety21(5):487–512.
Young,J.J.(2006).MakingUpUsers.Accounting,OrganizationsandSociety31(6):579–600.
Notes:
(1)ToputitinBurchelletal.’s(1985:405)terms,“withtheelectionofanewConservativeGovernmentin1979thethreearenasofthevalueaddedconstellationweresuddenlyrupturedandtransformed.”Valueaddedaccountingwasnolongerseenasatoolforthemanagementofthenationaleconomy.“Marketpressuresinanincreasinglyhighunemploymenteconomywereseentooffermoreeffectivemeansforincomecontrol”(ibid.).
(2)SeealsoMiller(1991),MillerandO’Leary(1994),andMuniesaetal.(2007).Inhisstudyoftheriseofdiscountedcashflowaccounting,Miller(1991:737),forexample,usesthenotionofassemblagetounravelhowacomplexinterplayofnewbodiesofknowledge,novelregulatoryattempts,changingtheoreticalconceptionsofgovernanceandanewaccountingrhetoriccontributedtotheriseofdiscountedcashflowtechniques.
(3)Forexample,thecontingentnatureofthediscreteaccountingentityassumptionunderlyingcorporatefinancialstatementsbecamevisibleandproblematicinthefinancialcrisisof2008asriskandvaluemigratedfromfragilecorporateentitiestostatesandtocitizens.
(4)Thisisnottosaythattherewerenoattemptsto“economize”organizationswithoutappealtothenotionofmarkets—plannedeconomiesprovideagoodcaseinpointhere,andaccountingplayedanimportantroleintheorganizingofstate-led,plannedeconomies.However,sincethecollapseoftheSovietUnion,economization,predominantly,goeshandinhandwiththemarketizationofmuchofsociallife.
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 20 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
(5)WeowethispointtoKimberlyChong.
(6)(Accounting)worthwasnolongermanifestedintermsof(historical)cost.Attentionwasshiftedfrom(historical)costaccountingand“tangibility”totheaccountingforafirm’sprospectsandthewaysinwhichassets,tangibleandintangibleonescontributetothegenerationofafirm’sfuturecashflows.
(7)Today,brandvaluationstillrepresentsanimportantareaofvaluation.Yet,mostaccountingstandards,includingtheinternationalaccountingstandards,donotallowfirmstoaccountforbrandsseparatelyintheirbalancesheetsduetothestringencyoftheirintangibleassetrecognitiontests.Yet,indirectly,brandsareoftensubsumedundertheaccountingforgoodwill,whichariseswhenonecompanyacquiresanothercompany.Suchexternallyacquiredgoodwillismeasuredintermsofthedifferencebetweenthepricepaidfortheacquiredassetsandtheirfairvalueatthepurchasedate.
(8)Forthedistinctionbetween“valueinuse”and“valueinexchange”seeforexampleAdamSmith(1970),citedinHutter(2010:244).Thisdistinctionhasbeenre-inscribedintoaccounting,andalthoughfairvaluefocusesonthe“valueinexchange”ofanasset,“valueinuse”isstillusedasanimportantreferencepointinaccountingvaluations,asforinstanceinthecaseofimpairmenttesting,whichwediscussfurtherbelow.
(9)AlthoughtheIVSCwasoriginallyestablishedindependentlyfromtheaccountingprofession,itisworthnotingtheincreasingintertwinementbetweentheIVSCandtheaccountingprofession.In2012,forexample,SirDavidTweedie,formerChairmanoftheIASBwasappointedasChairmanoftheIVSC’sBoardofTrustees.
(10)Theuses,usefulnessandmeasurementoffairvaluewere,andstillare,hotlydebatedamongstaccountingacademics,accountingstandardsettersandpreparers(seee.g.Bromwich2007;Macve2010;Penman2007;Walton2004;Whittington2008).Fairvalueisalsonotanewconcept.AsWalton(2007:5)pointsout,variantsoffairvaluedefinedintermsofmarketvaluecanbefoundinmuchofthenineteenth-centurycompanylegislationinEurope(GeorgiouandJack2011).However,thefocusingoffairvalueonexitpriceisrelativelyrecent.
(11)ThissectionislargelybasedonMennickenandMillo(2013).
(12)Deprivalvalueisthelowerofreplacementcostandrecoverableamount,whererecoverableamountrepresentsthehigherofanasset’snetrealizablevalueanditspresentvalue(valueinuse)(Macve2010:113).Macvearguesthatdeprivalvalue“copesmuchmoreadequatelyandsimplythanFV[fairvalue,added]doeswithtypicalreal-worldmarketimperfections”(2010:114).
(13)Seee.g.,InternationalAccountingStandard(IAS)36“ImpairmentofAssets,”whichstatesthattheimpairmentreviewshouldcompriseacomparisonofthecarryingamount(bookvalue)ofthefixedassetorgoodwillwithitsrecoverableamount,whererecoverableamountisdefinedasthehigherofanasset’sorcash-generatingunit’sfair
Accounting and the Plasticity of Valuation
Page 21 of 21
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: LondonSchool of Economics and Political Science; date: 10 April 2015
valuelesscostsofdisposalanditsvalueinuse.
(14)Wespeakofdisciplineddissonanceheretostressitsorchestratedandorganizednature.
Accessbroughttoyouby: LondonSchoolofEconomics
andPoliticalScience