NORTH AMERICAN DEPARTMENTInstitute of English and American Studies

University of Debrecen

PhD BTPA10327AV and ~BV

THEORIES OF POSTMODERNISMIN CULTURE, ARTS, AND LITERATURE

Instructor: Zoltán Abádi-Nagy (e-m: <abadi-nagy.zoltan@arts.unideb.hu>)

Semester: Fall 2013

Students: PhD

Class sessions: F 12:00-13:40 PM

Room: main bldg., 119

Office hours: Before/after classes and by appointment

Class format: seminar discussion combined with quizzes and presentation; historical and theoretical background information provided by your instructor in class where necessary; graded: 2 course credits + 10 essay credits (extra credits possible, see “Extra credit policy”)

Status of course: optional

Prospectus

Postmodernism entered the vocabularies of all the human sciences—besides literature, philosophy of history, and the fine arts—decades ago. Thus, while being an aesthetic and a style of thinking, it is a key to undrestanding our age as a cultural epoch. The course has been designed to reveal the roots of, and theories regarding, postmodernism. Questions central to aesthetics, critical theory, and literary texts, as well as the way postmodernity relates to modernism, feminism, popular culture, and so on will be studied; debates concerning terms as related to “postmodernism” like “late modernism,” “poststructuralism,” “deconstruction,” “academic postmodernism” will be highlighted. The texts introduced will inform students not only of the postmodern discourse and the variety of forms “postmodernisms” take but also of the critical stance which questions postmodernism.

General Requirements

2

The reading assignments are kept as reasonable as possible. Students will be expected to attend class faithfully, to keep up with the readings, and to come to class prepared with questions and comments for discussion. The classes will be conducted in an atmosphere in which the instructor and the students take the time to discuss readings and share their insights. We can set aside part of any class meeting for informal discussion of our work if needed.

Course Requirements

Informed attendance and participation; written response to our readings (quizzes); one presentation, two out-of-class essays (peer review, the possibility of revision), as well as final test.

Presentation

The oral presentation is based on a theoretical essay or book chapter related to postmodernity/postmodernism and included in the “Schedule” section of this syllabus. Students can fulfill this task in pairs—evaluating, comparing, and contrasting their chosen essays. The presenters should offer their positions and should generate a good debate. Sign-up deadline: October 4.

Writing Assignments

QUIZZES—will be in-class responses to the texts covered for a given class, inclusive of identification questions, multiple-choice comprehension questions, as well as othercontent questions designed to check if you have actually read the assigned text(s).

ANALYTIC ESSAYS—are two typed, five-page out-of-class analytic papers that study texts on our syllabus; the topics will have to be approved by your instructor. The first take-home paper will address the broader theme of postmodernism and culture (fine artsincluded), the second will concern the broader framework of postmodernism and literature or philosophy of history/historiography (depending on your dissertation topic). Both papers will be discussed in a peer workshop before they are submitted. You are expected to present a fully drafted version the week immediately preceding the first workshop and a half-page outline the week preceding the second workshop. The writing workshops are fundamental to the course. Students who do not participate in them because they are absent without good cause or because their fully drafted version (first paper) or outline (second paper) has not been submitted will lose 0.5 credit on the grade of the given paper once it is handed in. For due dates of draft, outline, and final versions see "Schedule" below.

2

3

FINAL TEST—It will be cumulative, a combination of various kinds of identification questions (to be described more fully near the end of the term).

NB

1. Documentation, format —When you consult or quote a source, document it according to the usual academic principles. In all matters of form, use the MLA or Chicago format.

2. Editing —Take pride in your work, edit it carefully, root out mechanical errors. Expect your in-class and out-of-class paper to lose one point per every five errors.

3. Font, margins —Out-of-class papers must be typed, double-spaced, in an ordinary font. Those with abnormally wide margins or typeface, will be returned unmarked, and must be resubmitted as directed.

4. Late paper policy —Essays may be handed in one class late without penalty, provided they have been presented on time in the peer-review workshop. Papers more than one class late cannot be accepted for credit.

5. Academic misconduct —Plagiarism will not be tolerated. The Institute of English and American Studies expects its students to adhere to the university’s policies regarding student conduct, especially academic misconduct.

The following statement must be typed on the title page of your essay and signed in

hand: “This paper has been prepared in full awareness of the international norms of academic conduct.”

Grading

For 2 course creditsParticipation in discussion (inclusive of occasional quizzes—unannounced, and

evaluated on an S/F basis, F meaning a loss of 0.1credit in each case): 0.7 credit(NB, each unexcused absence will mean an automatic loss of 0.1 credit point.)

presentation: 0.3 creditfinal test: 1.00 credit

For 10 essay credits (two 5-page essays)out-of-class essay 1 (culture): 5 credits,out-of-class essay 2 (history or literature) 5 credits

Extra credit policy—see NB-item 5 below

NB

1. Course requirements — The out-of-class papers and the final test are course requirements; i.e., a student must complete all of these assignments in order to pass the course.

2. Incompletes —Incompletes will be granted only if you must miss classes or the final test because of verified illness or for scheduled activities of official university organizations provided that I am notified in advance of your absence.

3

4

3. Absence policy — Regular attendance and participation are required. Faithful and alert attendance is extremely important to what you learn in the course, as well as to the success of the course as a whole. Grades can be lowered for unexcused absences. If circumstances exist that cause you to be absent more than twice in the semester, make an appointment to speak to me about your progress in the course. I reserve the right to lower your final grade by 5 points for each unofficial absence when, in my judgment, absences have been unwarranted. It is possible to fail the course by absences alone.

4. Tardy policy —Tardiness and early departures are not allowable. They are offensive to your fellow students and to the instructor because they disrupt class work. If you have a compelling reason for arriving late or leaving early, speak with me about the problem. If you regularly cut the beginning and/or the end of class sessions, it can add up to unexcused full-class-time absences.

5. Extra credit —You can get 5 extra credits for researching and electronically submitting (in MLA format) the 2000-2012 book-, book chapter-, and periodical bibliography of any ONE of the following: “theories of postmodernism 2000-2012” in 1) culture; 2) arts; 3) history); 4) literature. It may be necessary to subdivide “culture” further into cultural theory and social sciences (e.g., sociology). It is negotiable and will be discussed in class. It is mandatory in all categories that your bibliography should be based on the FULL exploration of what is available in our Institute Library and University Library on the one hand (IL and UL availability should be indicated at the end of each and every such item, by adding “IL or “UL” alternately); on the other hand, it should pick up all books but only essential book-chapter and periodical items of what is “out there in the world,” beyond the limits of our libraries. Sign-up deadline: October 4; submission deadline: December 20 at the latest.

6. Borderline grades —If your grade is borderline, it depends on attendance and the general pattern of your performance if you can get a break.

7. Discussing grades —If you have questions about how I evaluated your work, please stop by to see me. It is my policy to discuss grades in person only, and not over the telephone.

S C H E D U L ENB—In order to make the reading load manageable, reading dynamic is introduced with the symbols “i” (intensive reading is needed, comprehension quizzes can be expected) and “e” (extensive reading is enough; i.e., it is enough to cull the main points from those texts;

the main points will be tested).

Nr. Month Day Assignment1 September 13 Orientation

2 20 I.Postmodernism

andculture

Postmodern culture1

To identify the assigned readings in this column, go to the “Text” section below

4

5

Hassan 2 (i)Bertens 1 (i)Lyotard 1 (i)Kuhn (i)MacIntyre (e)Lacan (e)Rorty 1 (e)

Nr. Month Day Assignment3 Sept-Oct 27

Presentationsign-updeadline

Postmodern culture2

Jameson-interview (Stephanson 1) (i)Jameson 1 (e)Leitch 2 (e)Baudrillard 1, 2 (i)Norris (e)Hutcheon 1 (i)Eagleton 3 (e)

4 4 Modernismversus

postmodernism

Kant (i)Foucault 1 (i)Nietzsche (i)Lyotard 2 (i)Habermas (i)Rorty 2, 3 (e)Hassan 4, 5 (e)Bertens 2 (e)Leitch 1 (e)Montag (i)Bauman (e)Harvey (e)Waugh 3 (e)

5

6

5 11 Postmodernism and

culture, cont.

Postmodernismand

gender

Foucault 3 (i)Kristeva 1 (e), 2 (i)Butler (i)Kipnis (i)Sherzer (e)Waugh 1 (e)Simpson (i)Polan (e)Owens (i)Fraser and Nicholson (e)Haraway (e)

Nr. Month Day Assignment6 Oct-Nov 18 Drafted culture essay

duePostmodernism:

race andpostcolonialism

Vizenor (i)West 1 (e), 2 (i)hooks (i)Yúdice (i)Christian (e)During (i)Richard (e)Connor 1 (i)

7 25 Writing session I Postmodernism and

popular culture

Grossberg (i)Chambers (i)Connor 2 (i), 3 (e)Jameson 4 (e)

8 8 Culture paper due Postmodernismin

architecture andthe visual arts

Connor 4 (i)Gaggi 2 (i)Foster 2 (i)Vattimo (e)II.

Postmodernismin art,

literature, and history

6

7

9 15 Postmodernism and

literature

Fiedler (e)Sontag (e)Kermode (e)Hassan 3 (e)Spanos (e)Belsey (e)

10 22 NB. From this point on

(classes 10-11-12) you have the option to

do either track “A”

(literature) or track “B”

(history) each remaining

week

A.Literature

Authorship,representa-

tion,reference

Barthes (i), Foucault 2 (i)McHale 1 (e), Gaggi 3 (e)Thiher 1 (i), 2 (i), Hutcheon 3 (i), White 1 (e)

B.History

White 1 (i), Jameson 2 (i), Eagleton 4 (e), Kaplan (e), Hutcheon 4 (i), Rosenau (e)

Nr. Month Day Assignment11 Nov-Dec 29 Poststruc-

turalism,post-

criticism

Deleuze and Guattari (i), Derrida (i), Ricoeur (e), Eagleton 2 (e), Culler(e), Ulmer (i), Atkins (e), Gaggi 4 (e)

History Deleuze and Guattari (i), Derrida (i), Giddens (e), Eagleton 1 (e), White 2 (i), Jameson 3 (i)

12 6 Literature essay outlinedue

Post-modernfiction

McHale 2 (e), Waugh 2 (i),Fokkema 1 (e), 2 (e), Docherty 2(e),Eco1 (i), Fuentes (i), Mepham (i)

History Howe (i), White 3 and 4 (i), Jameson 4 (e), Hutcheon 5 (e), Ermarth (e)

7

8

13 13 Writing session II Postmodernpoetry and

theatre

Allen and Butterick (e)Holden (i)Connor 5 (i)Geis (e)

14 20 Final testLit/hist paper due

Concluding remarks

Text

The texts referred to by the authors’ names will be identified in the bibliography below. The items detailed below can all be found in one of these anthologies:1. Peter Brooker’s Modernism/Postmodernism;2. Patricia Waugh’s Postmodernism: A Reader;3. the three-volume course packet.If the source of an essay or book chapter is other than the Brooker or the Waugh anthology, and no volume number is indicated with “CP,” the text is available in course packets 1 or 2 (“CP3” items are always specified as such).

Bibilography of schedule items

Allen, David, and George F. Butterick. Preface. The Postmoderns: The New American Poetry

Revised. New York: Grove, 1982. 9-12. CP2.Appleby, Joyce, et al., eds. Knowledge and Postmodernism in Historical Perspective. New

York: Routledge, 1996.

Atkins, G. Douglas. “Reading Deconstruction.” Reading Deconstruction—Deconstructive Reading. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1983. 13-76. CP2.

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Caughie 208-13. CP2.

Bauman, Zygmunt. “Postmodernity, or Living with Ambivalence.” Natoli and Hutcheon

9-24. CP3.Baudrillard, Jean. 1. “From ‘Simulacra and Simulations.’” Brooker 151-62.

---. 2. “From ‘The Orders of Simulacra.’” Waugh, Postmodernism 186-88.

---. 3. “The Ecstasy of Communication.” Foster 126-34. CP1.

Belsey, Catherine. “Towards Cultural History.” Natoli and Hutcheon 551-67. CP3.

8

9

Bertens, Hans. 1. “Postmodern Culture(s).” Smyth 123-37. CP1.

---. 2. “The Postmodern Weltanschauung and Its Relation to Modernism: An IntroductorySurvey.” Natoli and Hutcheon 25-70. CP3.

Brooker, Peter, ed. Modernism/Postmodernism. London: Longman, 1992.

Butler, Judith. “Gender Trouble, Feminist Theory, and Psychoanalytic Discourse.” Feminism/Postmodernism. Ed. Linda J. Nicholson. New York: Routledge, 1990. 324-

40. CP3.

Caughie, John, ed. Theories of Authorship: A Reader. London: Routledge, 1981.

Chambers, Ian. “Contamination, Coincidence and Collusion. Pop Music, Urban Culture and the Avant-Garde.” Brooker 190-96.

Christian, Barbara. “The Race for Theory.” Leitch, Norton 2257-66. CP3.

Connor, Steven. Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989.

---. 1. “Postmodernism and Cultural Politics.” (Feminism and Postcoloniality.) Postmodernist Culture 224-37. CP1.

---. 2. “Postmodern TV, Video and Film.” Postmodernist Culture 158-83. CP1.

---. 3. “Postmodernism and Popular Culture” (Rock Music, Style and Fashion). Postmodernist

Culture 184-98. CP1.

---. 4. “Postmodernism in Architecture and the Visual Arts.” Postmodernist Culture 65-102. CP1.

---. 5. “Postmodern Performance.” Postmodernist Culture 132-57. CP2.

Culler, Jonathan. “Critical Consequences.” On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism afterStructuralism. Ithaca: Cornell, 1982. 180-225. CP2.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. From “Introduction: Rhizome.” Leitch, Norton 1593-1609. CP3.

Derrida, Jacques. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” Writing and Difference. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1978. 278-93. CP3.

Docherty, Thomas, ed. 1. Postmodernism: A Reader. New York: Columbia UP, 1993.

---. 2. “Postmodern Characterization: The Ethics of Alterity.” Smyth 169-88. CP2.

During, Simon. “Postmodernism or Post-Colonialism Today.” Docherty, Postmodernism 448-62. CP3.

Eagleton, Terry. The Illusions of Postmodernism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.---. 1. “From ‘Capitalism, Modernism and Postmodernism.’” Waugh,

Postmodernism 152-59. CP.---. 2. “Post-Structuralism.” Literary Theory: An Introduction . Minneapolis: U of Minnesota

P, 1983. 127-50. CP.

9

10

---. 3. “Fallacies.” Illusions. 93-130. CP3.---. 4. “History.” Illusions 45-68.

Eco, Umberto. “Postmodernism, Irony, the Enjoyable.” Brooker 225-28.

Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. “Historical Time as a Thing of the Past.” Sequel to History: Postmodernism and the Crisis of Representational Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1992. 25-45.

Fiedler, Leslie. “From ‘Cross the Border, Close the Gap.’” Waugh, Postmodernism 31-48.

Fokkema, Aleid. 1. “Conventions and Innovations: A Critical Survey.” 2. “General Discussion: Postmodern Character and the Issue of Representation.” Postmodern

Characters. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1991. 56-71; 181-90. CP2.

Foster, Hal, ed. 1. The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Port Townsend: Bay, 1983.

---. 2. “Wild Signs: The Breakup of the Signs in Seventies’ Art.” Ross 251-68. CP1.

Foucault, Michel. 1. “From ‘What is Enlightenment?’” Waugh, Postmodernism 96-108.

---. 2. “From ‘What Is an Author?’” Caughie 282-91. CP2.

---. 3. “From The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction.” Natoli and Hutcheon 333-41. CP3.

Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Nicholson. “Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism.” Ross 83-104. CP1.

Fuentes, Carlos. “Words Apart.” Brooker 243-47.

Gaggi, Silvio. 1. Modern/Postmodern: A Study in Twentieth-Century Arts and Ideas. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1989.

---. 2. “Replications and Convergencies.” Modern/Postmodern 57-87. CP1.

---. 3. Introduction. Modern/Postmodern 3-23. CP2.

---. 4. “Postmodernism, Posthumanism, and Politics.” Modern/Postmodern 157-91. CP2.

Geis, Deborah R. “Moving in the Present Tense: Monologue and the Discourses of Postmodernism in the American Experimental Theater.” Postmodern Theatric(k)s. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1993. 29-44. CP2.

Giddens, Anthony. “From ‘Modernism and Post-Modernism.’” Waugh, Postmodernism 11-13.

Grossberg, Lawrence. “Putting the Pop Back into Postmodernism.” Ross 167-90. CP.

Habermas, Jürgen. “From ‘Modernity: An Incomplete Project.’” Waugh, Postmodernism160-70.

Haraway, Donna. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Social Feminism in the 1980s.” Leitch, Norton 226-99. CP3.

Harvey, David. “Fordist modernism versus flexible postmodernism” (sic). The Condition

10

11

of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990. 338-42. CP3.

Hassan, Ihab. 1. The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture.Ohio State UP, 1987.

---. 2. “Culture, Indeterminacy and Immanence: Margins of the (Postmodern) Age.”Postmodern Turn 46-83. CP1.

---. 3. “From ‘The New Gnosticism: Speculation on an Aspect of the Postmodern Mind.’”Waugh, Postmodernism 60-77.

---. 4. “PostmodernISM: A Paracritical Bibliography.” Postmodern Turn 25-45. CP2.

---. 5. “Toward a Concept of Postmodernism.” Postmodern Turn 84-96. CP2.

Holden, Jonathan. “Postmodern Poetic Form: A Theory.” Style and Authenticity in Postmodern Poetry. Columbia: U of Missouri P, 1986. 9-32. CP2.

hooks, bell. “Postmodern Blackness.” Natoli and Hutcheon 510-18. CP3.

Howe, Irving. “Mass Society and Postmodern Fiction.” Waugh, Postmodernism 24-31.

Hutcheon, Linda. 1. “Beginning to Theorize Postmodernism.” Natoli and Hutcheon 243-72. CP3

---. 2. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York: Routledge, 1988.

---. 3. “The Problem of Reference.” Poetics 141-55. CP2.

---. 4. “Intertextuality, Parody and the Discovery of History.” Poetics 121-40. CP2.

---. 5. “Telling Stories: Fiction and History.” Brooker 229-42.

Jameson, Fredric. 1. “From Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” Natoli and Hutcheon 312-32. CP3.

---. 2. “From Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” Docherty 62-92. CP3.

---. 3. “From ‘Periodizing the Sixties.’” Waugh, Postmodernism 125-52.

---. 4. “Transformations of the Image in Postmodernity.” The Cultural Turn. London: Verso, 1998. 93-135. CP3.

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” Waugh, Postmodernism 89-95.

Kaplan, E. Ann. “Feminism/Oedipus/Postmodernism: The Case of MTV.” Postmodernism and Its Discontents: Theories and Practices. London: Verso, 1988. 30-44. CP1.

Kermode, Frank. “From A Sense of an Ending.” Waugh, Postmodernism 56-60.

Kipnis, Laura. “From ‘Feminism: The Political Conscience of Postmodernism?’” Brooker 204-12.

Kristeva, Julia. 1. “From One Identity to an Other.” The Portable Kristeva. New York: Columbia UP, 1997. 93-115. CP3.

11

12

---. 2. “A Feminist Postmodernism?” Brooker 197-203.

Kuhn, Thomas. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.” Appleby 340-55. CP3.

Lacan, Jacques. “The agency of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud” (sic). Écrits: A Selection. New York: Norton, 1977. 146-78. CP3.

Leitch, Vincent B. 1. “Writing Cultural History: The Case of Postmodernism” and 2. “Postmodern Culture: The Ambivalence of Fredric Jameson.” Postmodernism: Local Effects, Global Flows. Albany, NY: State U of New York P, 1996. 109-15 and 117-32. CP3.

---. 3. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism.New York: Norton, 2001.

Lyotard, Jean-François. 1. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984. xxiii-67. CP1.

---. 2. “From ‘Answering the Question: What Is Postmodernism?’” Waugh, Postmodernism117-25.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative, and the Philosophy of Science.” Appleby 357-67. CP3.

McHale, Brian. 1. “Authors: Dead and Posthumous.” 2. “Worlds of Discourse.” Postmodernist Fiction. New York: Methuen, 1987. 197-202; 162-75. CP2.

Mepham, John. “Narratives of Postmodernism.” Smyth 138-55. CP2.

Montag, Warren. “What Is at Stake in the Debate on Postmodernism?” Kaplan 88-103. CP.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. “From Twilight of the Idols.” Waugh, Postmodernism 108-12.

Natoli, Joseph, and Linda Hutcheon, eds. A Postmodern Reader. Albany, NY: State U of New York, 1993.

Norris, Christopher. “Lost in the Funhouse: Baudrillard and the Politics of Postmodernism.”

What’s Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Philosophy and the Ends of Philosophy.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1990. 164-93. CP.

Owens, Craig. “The Discourse of Others: Feminists and Postmodernism.” Foster, Anti-Aesthetic 57-82. CP1.

Polan, Dana. “Postmodernism and Cultural Analysis Today.” Kaplan 45-58. CP1.

Richard, Nelly. “Postmodernism and Periphery.” Docherty, Postmodernism 463-70. CP3.

Ricoeur, Paul. “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text.” Appleby 369-81. CP3.

Rorty, Richard. 1. “From ‘The Contingency of Language.’” Waugh, Postmodernism 170-86.

---. 2. “Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism.” Docherty 323-28. CP3.

---. 3. “Private Irony and Liberal Hope.” Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge:

12

13

Cambridge UP, 1989. 73-95. CP3.

Rosenau, Pauline Marie. “Humbling History, Transforming Time, and Garbling Geography

(Space).” Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1992. 61-76.

Ross, Andrew, ed. Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988.

Sherzer, Dina. “Postmodernism and Feminisms.” Smyth 156-68. CP1.

Simpson, David. “Feminisms and Feminizations in the Postmodern.” The Academic Postmodern and the Rule of Literature: A Report on Half Knowledge. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995. 92-110. CP1.

Smyth, Edmund J., ed. Postmodernism and Contemporary Fiction. London: Batsford, 1991.

Sontag, Susan. “From ‘Against Interpretation.’” Waugh, Postmodernism 48-55.

Spanos, William. “From ‘The Detective and the Boundary: Some Notes on the PostmodernLiterary Imagination.” Waugh, Postmodernism 78-86.

Stephanson, Anders. 1. “Regarding Postmodernism: A Conversation with Fredric Jameson.” Ross 3-30. CP1.

---. 2. “From ‘An Interview with Cornel West.’” Brooker 213-24.

Ulmer, Gregory L. “The Object of Post-Criticism.” Foster, Anti-Aesthetic 83-110. CP2.

Thiher, Allen. 1. “Representation.” 2. “Reference.” Words in Reflection: Modern Language

Theory and Postmodern Fiction. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. 91-119; 188-223. CP.

Vattimo, Gianni. “The Structure of Artistic Revolution.” The End of Modernity. Baltimore:

Johns Hopkins UP, 1991. 90-109. CP2.

Vizenor, Gerald. “From Manifest Manners: Postindian Warrior of Survivance.” Leitch, Norton 1975-86. CP3

Waugh, Patricia. 1. “Modernism, Postmodernism, Feminism: Gender and Autonomy Theory.” Postmodernism: A Reader. London: Arnold, 1992. 189-204.

---. 2. “What is metafiction and why are they saying such awful things about it?” (sic)Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. London: Metheun,1984. 1-19. CP2.

---. 3. “The Violence of Being Modern: Postmodernism as Critique of Enlightenment.” Practising POSTMODERNISM Reading MODERNISM.” London, Arnold: 1992. 66-85.

West, Cornel. 1. “Black Culture and Postmodernism.” Natoli and Hutcheon 390-97. CP3.

---. 2. Cf. Stephanson 2, “Interview.”

13

14

White, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. 1978. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1985.

---. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1987.

---.1. “The Historical Text as Literary Artifact “. Tropics of Discourse 81-100. Also Leitch, The

Norton Anthology 1536-53.---. 2. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” The Content of the Form

1-25. Also Appleby 393-407. CP3.---. 3. “The Fictions of Factual Representation.” Tropics of Discourse 121-34.---. 4. “The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory.” The Content of the Form

26-57.

Wilde, Alan. “From ‘Modernism and the Aesthetics of Crisis.’” Waugh, Postmodernism14-21.

Yúdice, George. “Marginality and the Ethics of Survival.” Ross 214-36. CP1

Recommended Further Reading (selective important items not mentioned above, inclusive of some Hungarian translations)

Altieri, Charles. “From Symbolist Thought to Immanence: The Ground of Postmodern American Poetry.” Boundary 2 1.3 (1973): 605-41.

Antin, David. “Modernism and Postmodernism: Approaching the Present in AmericanPoetry.” Boundary 2 1.1 (1972): 98-133.

Barth, John. “The Literature of Exhaustion.” “The Literature of Replenishment.” The Friday

Book: Essays and Other Nonfiction. New York: Perigee, 1988. 62-76; 193-206.

Baudrillard, Jean. Amerika.. 1986. Trans. Tótfalusi Ágnes. Budapest: Magvető, 1996.

Benamou, Michel, and Charles Caramello, eds. Performance in Postmodern Culture.Madison, WI: Coda, 1977.

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. London: Fontana, 1970. 219-54.

Bényei, Tamás. Rejtélyes rend: A krimi, a metafizika és a posztmodern. Modern Filológiai Füzetek 57. Budapest: Akadémiai, 2000.

Bradbury, Malcolm. The Novel Today. London: Fontana, 1977.

Butler, Christopher. After the Wake: An Essay on the Contemporary Avant-Garde. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1980.

Calinescu, M., and Douwe Fokkema, eds. Exploring Postmodernism. Amsterdam:

14

15

Benjamins, 1988.

Castells, Manuel. A hálózati társadalom kialakulása. (The Rise of the Network Society). 2000. Tr. Rohonyi András. Budapest: Gondolat-Infonia, 2005. It is useful to consult thetwo other volumes of his trilogy too: End of Millenium (Az évezred vége) and The

Power of Identity (Az identitás hatalma).

Couturier, Maurice. Representation and Performance in Postmodern Fiction. Montpellier:

U Paul Valéry, 1983.

Davis, D. Artculture: Essays on the postmodern (sic). New York: Harper, 1977.

de Certeau, M. Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Trans. B. Massumi. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1986.

De Lauretis, T. Technologies of Gender. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1987.

D’haen, Theo. “Post-Colonial Literature and Postmodern Literary Historiography.” Neohelicon 26.2 (1999): 19-29.

Dipple, Elizabeth. The Unresolvable Plot: Reading Contemporary Fiction. New York:Routledge, 1988.

Docherty, Thomas. After Theory: Postmodernism/postmarxism. London: Routledge, 1990.

Eco, Umberto. Travels in Hyperreality. Trans. W. Weaver. London: Pan, 1987.

Faurschou, G. “Fashion and the cultural logic of postmodernity” (sic). Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 11 (1987): 68-84.

Federman, Raymond, ed. Surfiction: Fiction Now and Tomorrow. Chicago: Swallow, 1975.

Fekete, J., ed. Life After Postmodernism: Essays on Value and Culture. London: Macmillan, 1988.

Fokkema, Douwe, and Hans Bertens, eds. Approaching Postmodernism.Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1986.

Foucault, Michel. “Mi a szerző?” Trans. Erős Ferenc and Kicsák Lóránt. Nyelv a végtelenhez. Debrecen: Latin betűk, 2000. 119-45.

Gardner, John. On Moral Fiction. New York: Basic, 1977.

Gass,William H. Fiction& the Figures of Life. Boston: Nonpareil, 1971.

Graff,Gerald. Literature Against Itself: Literary Ideas in Modern Society. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1979.

Habermas, Jürgen. Cf. Lyotard.

---. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. F. G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1987.

Harper, Phillip Brian. Framing the Margins: The Social Logic of Postmodern Culture.

15

16

New York: Oxford UP, 1994.

Hassan, Ihab. The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literatrure. 2nd ed. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1982.

---. Paracriticisms: Seven Speculations of the Times. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1975.

---. Innovation/Renovation: New Perspective on the Humanities. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1983.

Hutcheon, Linda. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier UP, 1980.

---. The Politics of Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1989.

Jameson, Fredric. A posztmodern, avagy a késői kapitalizmus logikája. (Only selected chapters from the original.) Budapest: Jószöveg, 1997.

Jencks, Charles. The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. London: Academy, 1977.

---. What is Postmodernism. London: Academy, 1986.

Kafalenos, “Fragments of a discourse on Roland Barthes and the postmodern mind” (sic). Chicago Review 35 (1985): 72-94.

Kellman, Steven G. The Self-Begetting Novel. London: Macmillan, 1980.

Kermode, Frank. “Modernisms.” Innovations: Essays on Art and Ideas. Ed. Bernard Bergonzi. London: Macmillan, 1968.

Klinkowitz, Jerome. Literary Disruptions: The Making of a Post-Contemporary American Fiction. 2nd ed. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1980.

---. Literary Subversions: New American Fiction and the Practice of Criticism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1985.

Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language. Trans. T. Gora, et al. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.

LeClair, Tom, and Larry McCaffery, eds. Anything Can Happen: Interviews with Contemporary American Novelists. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1983.

Lodge, David. Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metnoymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature. London: Arnold, 1977.

Lyotard, Jean-François. A posztmodern állapot: Jürgen Habermas, Jean-François Lyotard,

Richard Rorty tanulmányai.Trans. Angyalosi Gergely, Bujalos Istvaán Nyizsnyánszky Ferenc, Orosz László. BudapestÉ Századvég, 1993.

Mazzaro, Jerome. Postmodern American Poetry. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1980.

McCaffery, Larry. Postmodern Fiction: A Bio-Bibliographical Guide. New York: Greenwood, 1986.

Morisette, Bruce. “Post-Modern Generative Fiction.” Critical Inquiry 2 (1975): 253-62.

16

17

Newman, Charles. The Post-Modern Aura: The Act of Fiction in an Age of Inflation.Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP, 1985.

Nicholson, Linda J., ed. Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1990.

O’Neill, J. “Religion and Postmodernism.” Theory, Culture & Society 5.2-3 (1988): 225-39.

Pavel, Thomas. The Feud of Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.

Perloff, Marjorie. The Poetics of Indeterminacy. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1981.

Pethő Bertalan. A posztmodern. Budapest, Gondolat, 1992.

Poggioli, Renato. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Trans. Gerald Fitzgerald. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1968.

Portoghesi, P. Postmodern: The Architecture of the Postindustrial Society. Trans. E. Shapiro. New York: Rizzoli, 1983.

Radhakrishnan, R. “The post-modern event and the end of logocentrism” (sic). Boundary2 12.1 (1983): 33-60.

Richters, A. “Modernity—postmodernity controversies: Habermas and Foucault” (sic).Theory, Culture & Society 5.4 (1988): 611-43.

Riffaterre, Michael. “Intertextual Representation: On Mimesis as Interpretive Discourse.” Critical Inquiry 11.1 (1984): 141-62.

Roberts, J. “Postmodern Television and the Visual Arts.” Screen 28.2 (1987): 118-27.

---. Postmodernism, Politics and Art. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1990.

Rorty, Richard. Cf. Lyotard.

---. Consequences of Pragmatism. Brighton: Harvester, 1982.

Rose, M. A. The Postmodern and the Postindustrial. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991.

Ryan, M. “Postmodern Politics.” Theory, Culture & Society 5.2-3 (1988): 559-76.

Said, Edward. The World, The Text, The Critic (sic). London: Faber, 1983.

Sarup, Madan. An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism. 2nd ed. Athens: GA: U of Gerogia P, 1993.

Scholes, Robert. Structural Fabulation: Fiction of the Future. Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 1975.

---. Fabulation and Metafiction. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1979.

Schulte-Sasse, J. “Modernity and Modernism, Postmodernity and Postmodernism: Framing the Issue.” “Imagination and Modernity; or, the Taming of the Human Mind.”Cultural Critique 5 (1987): 5-22; 23-48.

Schusterman, R. “Postmodernist Aestheticism.” Theory, Culture & Society 5.2-3 (1988): 337-56.

17

18

Séllei Nóra. Mért félünk a farkastól? – Feminista irodalomszemlélet itt és most. Debrecen: Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó, 2007.

Silverman, H. J., ed. Postmodernism: Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge, 1990.

Silverman, H. J., and D. Welton, eds. Postmodernism and Continental Philosophy. Albany: State u of New York P, 1988.

Soja, Edward. Postmodern Geographies. London: Verso, 1990.

Spanos, William, ed. Martin Heidegger and the Question of Literature: Toward a Postmodern Literary Hermeneutics. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1979.

Stevick, Philip. “Scheherezade runs out of plots, goes on talking: the king, puzzled, listens: An essay on new fiction” (sic). TriQuarterly 26 (1973): 332-62.

---. Alternative Pleasures: Postrealist Fiction and the Tradition. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1981.

Sukenick, Ronald. IN FORM: Digressions on the Act of Fiction. Crosscurrents/Modern Critiques. 3rd Ser. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1985.

Tanner, Tony. City of Words: American Fiction 1950-1970. New York: Harper, 1971.

Tarn, N. “Fresh Frozen Fenix: Random Notes on the Sublime, the Beautiful and the Uglyin the Postmodern Era.” New Literary History 16 (1985): 417-26.

Tester, Keith. The Life and Times of Postmodernity. London: Routledge, 1993.

Thurley, G. Counter-Modernism in Current Critical Theory. London: Macmillan, 1983.

Turner, B. S., ed. Theories of Modernity and Postmodernity. London: Sage, 1990.

Trachtenberg, S, ed. The Postmodern Moment. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1985.

Vay Tamás. A postmodern Amerikában. Budapest: Platon, 1991.

Wasson, Richard. “Notes on a New Sensibility.” Partisan Review 36 (1969): 460-77.

---. “From Priest to Prometheus: Culture and Criticism in the Postmodern Period.” Journal of Modern Literature 3 (1974): 1188-1202.

White, A., and P. Stallybrass. The Poetics and Politics of Transgression. London: Metheun, 1986.

White, Hayden. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP, 1978.

Wilde, Alan. Horizons of Assent: Modernism, Postmodernism, and the Ironic Imagination.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1981.

---. “The Narrativization of Real Events.” Critical Inquiry 7.4 (1981): 793-98.

---. “Historical Pluralism.” Critical Inquiry 12.3 (1986): 480-93.

Wolfe, Tom. The Painted Word. New York: Bantam, 1975.

Wolin, R. “Modernism versus Postmodernism.” Telos 62 (1984-85): 9-29.

18

19

Zavarzadeh, Mas’ud. The Mythopeic Reality: The Postwar American Nonfiction Novel.Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1976.

---. Theory (Post) Modernity Opposition: An “Other” Introduction to Cultural Theory. Washington, D.C.: Maisonneuve, 1991.

Ziegler, Heide, and Christopher Bigsby, eds. The Radical Imagination and the Liberal Tradition: Interviews with English and American Novelists. London: Junctions, 1982.

19