An Up Close Look at a Home Care Led Bundled Payment...

23
Confidential and Proprietary Not for Distribution (except to authorized persons). An Up Close Look at a Home Care Led Bundled Payment Program Amy Weiss VP, Solution Development Visiting Nurse Service of NY The statements contained in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CMS. The authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this document.

Transcript of An Up Close Look at a Home Care Led Bundled Payment...

Confidential and ProprietaryNot for Distribution (except to authorized persons).

An Up Close Look at a Home Care Led Bundled Payment Program

Amy WeissVP, Solution DevelopmentVisiting Nurse Service of NY

The statements contained in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CMS. The authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this document.

2

Visiting Nurse Service of New York

• The largest not-for-profit homecare agency in the country

• We are more than just nursing− More than 1,535 nurses, 535 rehab therapists, 340 social

workers, 85 other clinicians, 12,370 home health aides, speaking over 50 languages

− Hospice & Palliative Care− Private Duty Services− Utilization Management and Care Management− Population Health Analytics− NY Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP)

Performing Provider System (PPS) support• Participate with 14 PPSs; On Executive Committees with 6

and 53 other workgroups− Health Home and behavioral health transitions− Center for Home Care Policy & Research− CHOICE Health Plan (MA, MLTC, Dual, FIDA, SNP)

• We visit more than 32,000 people each day

3

VNSNY in a Changing Healthcare System

AffordableCare Act

Industry Driven Towards Post-acute Care

Value-Based Arrangements

Population Health

Shared Risk and Bundling

MedicaidRedesign

Ability to Care for High Cost, Complex Patients

New Payment Methodologies

Revenue Compression

PredictiveAnalytics

Triple Aim

4

A Dual Imperative for Home Health Providers

Source: Advisory Board

Traditional Home Care Under

Medicare/Managed Care Fee for

Service

Care Coordination and

Management Outside Core

Patient Population

5

Our Partners

Academic Medical Centers

Academic Medical Centers

Health Technology Companies

Health Technology Companies

Specialty HospitalsSpecialty Hospitals

Non-traditional Community Based

Providers

Non-traditional Community Based

Providers

Sub-acute Care Facilities

Sub-acute Care Facilities

Integrated Delivery Systems

Integrated Delivery Systems

DSRIP Performing Provider SystemsDSRIP Performing Provider Systems

Federal + State Institutions

Federal + State Institutions

National + RegionalInsurance ProvidersNational + RegionalInsurance Providers

PhysiciansPhysicians

Rehabilitation Centers

Rehabilitation Centers

Accountable Care Organizations

6

VNSNY Approach to Value Based Care and Payment

• Medicare and Medicaid Fee for Service is drying up

• Managed Care payers are seeking a cheaper alternative to facility based care

• Utilizing years of data and recent experiences in episode bundles, we began entering into case rates with managed care payers in 2014

• In early 2016 we began entering into performance-based contracts with incentives around a few core quality measures

• Late 2016 we are expanding the in-scope quality measures with a goal of 1/3 of our managed care revenue under some form of value-based arrangement

• Preparing for clinical episode based payments with managed care for 2017 and accountability for additional quality metrics

7

Experience with CMS Bundles

• VNSNY is a risk-bearing provider for a 90-day cardiac post-acute bundle• VNSNY shares in upside and downside risk for all patients admitted to VNSNY

with a recent hospitalization for congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction• Our Population Care Coordinators provide ongoing assessment and care

coordination throughout the 90-day episode• VNSNY has successfully reduced readmission rates and overall episode cost in

preliminary data from our first full risk-bearing year (2015) and achieved almost $1M in NPRA over first two years

• We are a preferred post-acute provider for cardiac and orthopedic bundles at two large health systems in NYC

• Co-designed clinical pathways leveraging our expertise in clinically and socially complex patient care

• Developed a health information exchange for the transfer of clinical visit data between VNSNY and the hospital providers

• Established enhanced communication pathways between VNSNY and hospital care coordinators

• Helped hospitals reduce episode cost through SNF avoidance programs and readmission reduction strategies

• We are a preferred post-acute provider for a top-ranked orthopedic specialty hospital’s joint replacement bundle

• Developed customized home care episode utilization reporting and population analytics

• Achieved the hospital’s targets for timeliness of care, readmissions, and other quality metrics

8

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative launched (voluntary)

CMS expands the BPCI participant

pool

BPCI participants offered a 2 year

extension

Comprehensive Care for Joint

Replacement (CJR) Bundle goes live

(mandatory in select MSAs3)

Oncology Care Model goes live

(voluntary)

CMS announces 3 new EPMs2 for orthopedic and

cardiac care (mandatory)

2013-2014 20162015

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement…an eye toward the (very near) future

A bundled episode is triggered by a hospitalization coded with one of the 48 MS-DRG groups selected by the BPCI

participant. The episode starts when the patient is admitted to the Episode

Initiating Provider.

In Models 2 and 3, Medicare A and B payments are grouped into a care

episode for 30/60/90 days and retrospectively reconciled against the

target price. Target price = historical spend – 2-3%

discount

BPCI participants have the option to gainshare with other providers,

incentivizing care coordination and clinical efficiency.

Financial and quality performance including NPRA1 is reported quarterly

followed by a series of true-ups.

BPCI Framework

1NPRA: Net Payment Reconciliation Amount2Episodic Payment Models3MSA: Metropolitan Statistical Area

9

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement…an eye toward the (very near) future

• As of July 1, 2016, the BPCI initiative has 1448 participants in Phase 2 comprised of 305 Awardees and 1143 Episode Initiators

360

658

262

979

0100200300400500600700

Acute CareHospitals

SkilledNursingFacilities

PhysicianGroup

Practices

Home HealthAgencies

InpatientRehab

Facilities

Participants by Provider Type*

*Non-provider Awardees excluded

296

3

1[VALUE]

BPCI in New York State

Skilled Nursing FacilitiesHome Health AgenciesPhysician Group

296

3

1[VALUE]

Model 2

Model 3

Source: Where Innovation is Happening. www.innovation.cms.gov

10

CMS Results in Bundles

11

The VNSNY Bundled Payment Program

Bundled Care

DRGs selected from 48 CMS-designated episodes: congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction

Defined episode duration: 90 days

Episode is initiated when VNSNY admits a patient within 30 days of an acute hospitalization for the selected DRG

Medicare Part A and Part B services are bundled, including physician visits, DME, outpatient rehabilitation, and hospital readmissions

Payment Model

A target price is established based on historical performance data; this incorporates a 3% discount to Medicare

Post-acute service claims are paid by Medicare on a fee for service basis

A retrospective review of costs determines if total cost of care in the bundle fell above or below the target price

If costs fell below target, Medicare pays the participant the difference and savings are distributed between contracted partners; if cost is above target, the participant pays Medicare the difference

12

Program Timeline

2012 - 2013

2014 - 2015

Evaluated options for participation in BPCI

Evaluated: Existing capabilities to be

leveraged for this engagement New capabilities needed to meet

intended outcomes Identified the appropriate target diagnosis Highest hospitalization rates Highest health system cost

Identified convening partner Designed 90 day model:

Care components Staffing needs

2015 - 2016

Launched the program in 2014 (non-risk sharing year)

Tweaked risk stratifying tool based on actual BPCI patient data

Adjusted workflows to meet program goals

Continued to streamline transitions Focused on training and

communication improvements with other VNSNY hospital and field based staff

Received preliminary program performance data

Expansion into new MI DRGs in 2015

Leveraging RHIO alert data Exploring data integration

with upstream providers Enhancing our Population

Health Care Management platform

Seeking direct agreement with CMS

13

Care Redesign in a Bundle: Beyond Traditional Home Care

Triggering hospitalization

Traditional home care episode Remainder of 90-day episode

• VNSNY RN on-site hospital liaisons (~40 facilities): shift from intake processing to transitional care

• Additional focus on transitional care & HF/MI home care pathways

• Calculation of acuity score using enhanced risk stratification algorithm (low, rising, high risk)

• Ongoing internal tracking of key outcome metrics, with frequent feedback loop to core clinical operations teams

• Introduction of VNSNY CO•CARE 90 model, anchored by a Nurse Population Care Coordinator who delivers/manages care with other providers beyond traditional home care period of service

• Stratification-driven mix of face-to-face, telehealth, telephonic communication; emphasis on goal-setting via motivational interviewing and behavior activation

• Partnership with community resources to tailor care plans and interventions to cultural/demographic needs

Initial Care Redesign Elements

Goal: Reduced 90-day rehospitalization rates and improved coordination of post-acute care

14

Program Timeline

2012 - 2013

2014 - 2015

Evaluated options for participation in BPCI

Evaluated: Existing capabilities to be

leveraged for this engagement New capabilities needed to meet

intended outcomes Identified the appropriate target diagnosis Highest hospitalization rates Highest health system cost

Identified convening partner Designed 90 day model:

Care components Staffing needs

2015 - 2016

Launched the program in 2014 (non-risk sharing year)

Tweaked risk stratifying tool based on actual BPCI patient data

Adjusted workflows to meet program goals

Continued to streamline transitions Focused on training and

communication improvements with other VNSNY hospital and field based staff

Received preliminary program performance data

Expansion into new MI DRGs in 2015

Leveraging RHIO alert data Exploring data integration

with upstream providers Enhancing our Population

Health Care Management platform

Seeking direct agreement with CMS

15

Population Care Management is Used to Provide Comprehensive and Patient-Centered Care

16

Care Redesign

Triggering hospitalization Traditional home care episode Remainder of 90-day episode

Patient & Family

Hospital‐Based RN Liaison

HomeCareNurse

HomeCare

Therapist

RNPopulation

CareCoordinator

Social Worker

Health Coach

Nurse Practitioner

Psych Nurse Practitioner

Pharmacist

Referring MD

D/C Planner

Other Care Managers

PrimaryCare

Physician

SpecialistPhysicians

Post‐AcuteFacilities

Community‐Based

Organizations

Hospital‐Based RN Liaison

HomeCareNurse

HomeCare

Therapist

RNPopulation

CareCoordinator

Social Worker

Health Coach

Nurse Practitioner

Psych Nurse Practitioner

Pharmacist

Referring MD

D/C Planner

Other Care Managers

PrimaryCare

Physician

SpecialistPhysicians

Post‐AcuteFacilities

Community‐Based

Organizations

17

Program Timeline

2012 - 2013

2014 - 2015

Evaluated options for participation in BPCI

Evaluated: Existing capabilities to be

leveraged for this engagement New capabilities needed to meet

intended outcomes Identified the appropriate target diagnosis Highest hospitalization rates Highest health system cost

Identified convening partner Designed 90 day model:

Care components Staffing needs

2015 - 2016

Launched the program in 2014 (non-risk sharing year)

Tweaked risk stratifying tool based on actual BPCI patient data

Adjusted workflows to meet program goals

Continued to streamline transitions Focused on training and

communication improvements with other VNSNY hospital and field based staff

Received preliminary program performance data

Expansion into new MI DRGs in 2015

Leveraging RHIO alert data Exploring data integration

with upstream providers Enhancing our Population

Health Care Management platform

Seeking direct agreement with CMS

18

Boosting the Power of VNSNY’s Population Health Through Technology

• Care management platform that provides “real time” decision support tools− Built-in risk stratification algorithm

• Identifying the right patients for the right clinical pathway, and the right level of care

− Status changes and event notifications− Care management clinical pathways and evidence-based

assessment tools− Outcomes reporting for identifying improvement opportunities

and areas of success• Remote patient monitoring

• Data integration with upstream providers

19

Boosting the Power of VNSNY’s Population Health Through Technology

Enhancing our BPCI Bundle:• Leveraging the additional information made available through CMS

− Monthly claims− Reconciliation reporting

• Supporting care management over the 90 day bundle period

− Using home care assessment data− Risk stratification time points− CHHA to post-CHHA workflows − Population Care Coordinator encounters (types and dosing)− Use of evidence based tools and assessments

• Reporting and analytics

− Clinical quality and outcomes− Process performance metrics− Financial performance − External reporting requirements − Building your quality and financial ROI

20

• Challenge: Ensuring that workflows and processes are constantly monitored for relevance and effectiveness

• Solution: Identify dedicated staff that constantly monitors program performance and evaluates processes to identify patterns or trends that must trigger workflow and protocol changes for continued possible program effectiveness-and leverage technology wherever to produce meaningful and actionable program analytics

Challenges and Lessons Learned in BPCI

Identifying and providing care for the right patient cohort

Aligning the risk stratification tool with the target patient population traits and program goals

Focusing on care transition points for improved hand-offs and continuity of care

Ensuring that workflows and processes are revised to incorporate program findings

• Challenge: Hospital “working” DRG is not always aligned with the final DRG, so targeting the right patients was a challenge

• Solution: Develop a predictive model that runs in the background of our EMR to assist with identification of BPCI cases that may have been missed at intake

• Challenge: Adjusting existing tools to stratify patients into a high, rising or low risk bucket that reflects the needs of our program and guides the right set of interventions

• Solution: Used actual BPCI patient data to tweak the algorithm on an ongoing basis so that it is aligned with the program and patient goals

• Challenge: Seamless transitioning from a hospital to a home setting and from a CHHA episode to the remainder of the 90 day episode

• Solution: Provide extensive education on the BPCI program and goals for clinical staff across settings and across VNSNY departments and ensure that guiding principles of our care model are used throughout the 90 day episode of care

21

VNSNY and BPCI: Moving Forward

• In 2016 VNSNY published a report of program performance to date:

• Continued positive performance has facilitated our move to extend our BPCI participation through 2018

• VNSNY is seeking Single Awardee status with CMS for the duration of our participation

22

Value Based Programs with Provider Partners: Challenges

• Early engagement of post-acute care providers is key in developing value-based models across the care continuum

• Lack of EMR integration or even basic clinical information exchange can be a significant hindrance in care coordination efforts

• Hospital systems, ACOs, and physician groups are hesitant to enter into risk sharing arrangements with an independent post-acute care provider

• Alignment between senior leadership across organizations may not trickle down to ground-level clinical staff

23

Questions

• Questions?

• Thank you Amy WeissVP, Solution Development

[email protected]

212-609-4861