An introduction to geophysical...
Transcript of An introduction to geophysical...
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, VOL. 19, ES6010, doi:10.2205/2019ES000697, 2019
An introduction to geophysical distributionsA. A. Lushnikov1 and Sh. R. Bogoutdinov1,2
Received 12 November 2019; accepted 12 December 2019; published 17 December 2019.
This paper reviews the methods of treating the results of geophysical observationstypically met in various geophysical studies. The main emphasize is given to the setsof data on the phenomena undergone the actions of random factors. These data arenormally described by the distributions depending on the nature of the processes.Among them the magnitude of earthquakes, the diameters of moon craters, theintensity of solar flares, population of cities, size of aerosol and hydrosol particles,eddies in turbulent water, the strengths of tornadoes and hurricanes and manyother things. Irrespective of the causes for their randomness these manifestationsof planetary activity are characterized by few distribution functions like Gaussdistribution, lognormal distribution, gamma distribution, and algebraic distributions.Each of these distributions contains empirical parameters the values of which dependon the concrete nature of the process. Especially interesting are so called โthickโdistributions with the algebraic tails. Possible parametrizations of these distributionsare discussed. KEYWORDS: Random geophysical processes; distributions; master equation;parametrization of distributions.
Citation: Lushnikov, A. A. and Sh. R. Bogoutdinov (2019), An introduction to geophysical distributions, Russ.J. Earth. Sci., 19, ES6010, doi:10.2205/2019ES000697.
Introduction
The random factors playing the central role invarious geophysical processes insistently demandthe application of stochastic approaches for theirstudy. This is true even for phenomena describingby well based equations, because interactions be-tween several nonlinear processes often lead to theirchaotic behavior. The approaches allowing for con-sideration such processes had appeared since verylong ago and have proven their use in all cases with-out exception [Ding and Li, 2007; Eckmann and
1Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sci-ences (GC RAS), Moscow, Russia
2Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Rus-sian Academy of Sciences (IPE RAS), Moscow, Russia
Copyright 2019 by the Geophysical Center RAS.http://rjes.wdcb.ru/doi/2019ES000697-res.html
Ruelle, 1985; Van Kampen, 2007; Klyatskin, 2005;McKibben, 2011; Michael, 2012].
In this paper we discuss the geophysical phenom-ena describing by slowly varying functions of timeover significant time intervals rather than short-period fluctuations, which are in addition small (inamplitude, for example) and from the first sightcannot noticeably affect the course of the geophys-ical events. The most bright example of such phe-nomena is well known in the rock destruction the-ory, when very small and almost imperceptible chan-ges accumulate, and ultimately lead to disruptionsin the development of rock material and then tocomplete disruption of the rock [Eckmann and Ru-elle, 1985; Michael, 2012]. Among other geophys-ical phenomena it is necessary to mention one re-markable mechanism of occurrence of earthquakes.Individual oscillations of the plates can be smalland considered in the harmonic approximation. How-ever, the interactions between the individual modes
ES6010 1 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
can lead to their merger in such a way that the en-ergies of individual modes are added and a prin-cipally new mode forms, which is yet described inthe harmonic approximation, but it has the energyequal to the sum of the energies of the merged os-cillations. This merger process continues until asingle wave of very large amplitude is generated.Its energy continues to grow due to the capture oflow-energy modes, which leads to a catastrophe (anearthquake, for example). Similar mechanism canalso be responsible for the formation of giant seawaves referred often to as the killer waves. Thedynamics of these accumulation processes dependsstrongly on the distributions of the energy carriers[Bailey, 1964; Eckmann and Ruelle, 1985; Mazo,2002; McKibben, 2011; Michael, 2012].
Another example is the atmospheric aerosol andits role as the climate formation factor [Adams andSeinfeld, 2002; Barrett and Clement, 1991; Jansonet al., 2001; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998].
Generally accepted evolutionary equations moreor less correctly describe the average temporal evo-lution of complex geophysical structures (changesin the state of the atmosphere, aerosol processesand climate, the development of territorial struc-tures, demographic structures, etc) once the transi-tion rates between states of the system are known.For example, the simplest balance equation withempirically introduced birth and death rates de-scribe the dynamics of transitions between the stateswith different population sizes. If, however, we in-troduce the random factor that spreads the valuesof the birth and death rates, the dynamic picturecan radically change.
Structure of Geophysical Data
Geophysical data are represented by numericalarrays of dimension ฮฉ. For example, one-dimensio-nal arrays can represent data on concentrationsof harmful emissions in the atmosphere or a se-quence of radar signals from a satellite at prede-termined time intervals, or, for example, randomlyselected measurement times. Our idea is that thereis a certain probabilistic process behind geophysi-cal data. Each data sequence is implemented withsome probability. There are several ways to pro-cess a signal. This can be, for example, Fourier
or wavelet analysis, which allows one to select themain frequencies of the signal. With this approach,it is assumed that the signal itself is deterministic,and what we observe is a noise + signal. Our taskis to try to clear the signal from the hindrances.This is precisely the problem that always arises ina location (sound, radio), when the emitted signalis known, whereas the incoming signal is composedof noise plus the reflected (partially or completely)signal, by which we should judge on the geophysi-cal processes occurring far away from the receiver.This is how objects are located by modern posi-tioning systems. The noise introduces an error forreducing which it is necessary to establish the na-ture of the noise. In the case of satellite sensing,several such reasons have been established: we haveelucidated the role of Rydberg complexes formed ataltitudes of 70 - 110 km in the ionosphere and therole of aerosol particles exposed to solar radiation,which leads to their charging. The strong influenceof these particles on the state of the ionosphericplasma is beyond any doubt [Golubkov et al., 2010;2014].
Next, there is another type of geophysical signalswhen the characteristics of the signal generator arenot known, and the task of processing is to extractthe maximum information from the signal. For ex-ample, it may be a signal from extraterrestrial civ-ilizations. Then we can expect to find a dominantsignal in it and try to filter it out. It is possible toimagine another situation where the signal does notcontain a dominant at all. Attempts to apply someaveraging procedures to irregular signal turn outcompletely unsuccessful [Bailey, 1964; Mazo, 2002].As an example, the noises from ther Universe canbe mentioned. The question is, then what to dowith such signals?
Our probabilistic concept assumes that a stochas-tic signal is described by the probability of its im-plementation. For definiteness, we consider a sta-tionary signal with a random amplitude and intro-duce a probability to find the given amplitude in thesignal. Our task is to find this probability from themeasurement data, which are represented by a setof points belonging to signals in a given amplitudeinterval. As the interval narrows and the measure-ment time lengthens, such a procedure allows oneto calculate the density of the distribution of mea-surements. However, due to lack of data (and oftenmeasurement time), this procedure is low produc-
2 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
tive. Therefore, it is more progressive to use cu-mulative distributions, i.e., to calculate the num-ber of measurements with an amplitude above agiven one. Now, to calculate the distribution den-sity, a discrete mathematical analysis apparatus isrequired, since we will have to differentiate a func-tion defined on a discrete set.
As an example, we consider an aerosol counterthat determines the concentration of dispersed im-purities in atmospheric air [Julanov et al., 1983;Zagaynov et al., 1989]. In this counter, each par-ticle enters a countable volume illuminated by alaser beam. The signal scattered from the beamis read by the photomultiplier. This counter candetermine the concentration of particles, providedthat the speed of pumping air through the count-ing volume is known, and the particles fall into thecounting volume one at a time. But a single countcannot be guaranteed, particles in the counting vol-ume can fall in two, three, etc. This means that thecounter will underestimate the counted concentra-tion of particles. Now the signal (response from thesamples) will have a different amplitude dependingon the number of particles falling into the countingvolume . Thus, a typical task arises of analyzing astochastic signal. This task is complicated by thefact that the aerosol impurity may contain particlesof different sizes (polydisperse aerosol). Then theproblem of analysis is complicated, but still possi-ble (see refs [Adams and Seinfeld, 2002; Barrett andClement, 1991; Julanov et al., 1984; 1986; Jansonet al., 2001; Leyvraz, 2003; Lushnikov and Kagan,2016; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998; Schmeltzer et al.,1999]
Basic Equations
In what follows we will use the examples adoptedfrom the physics of dispersed particles. We considerthe systems comprising the set of particles of dif-ferent sizes and will explain the basic idea of thestochastic approach.
Particle Size Distributions
The particle size distributions play the centralrole in physics and chemistry of atmospheric aerosol,although a direct observation of the distributions
are possible only in principle. Practically what wereally measure is just a response of an instrumentto a given particle size distribution,
๐ (๐ฅ) =
โซ๏ธ๐ (๐ฅ, ๐)๐(๐)๐๐ (1)
Here ๐(๐) is the particle size distribution (normally๐ is the particle radius), ๐ (๐ฅ) is the reading ofthe instrument measuring the property of aerosol๐ฅ, and ๐ (๐ฅ, ๐) is referred to as the linear responsefunction of the instrument. For example, ๐ (๐ฅ) canbe the optical signal from an aerosol particle in thesensing volume of an optical particle counter, thepenetration of the aerosol through the diffusion bat-tery (in this case ๐ฅ is the length of the battery), orsomething else. The function ๐(๐) cannot dependon the dimensional variable ๐ alone. The particlesize is measured in some natural units ๐๐ . In thiscase the distribution is a function of ๐/๐๐ and de-pends on some other dimensionless parameters orgroups. The particle size distribution is normalizedas follows:
โโซ๏ธ0
๐(๐/๐๐ )๐๐
๐๐ = 1. (2)
The length ๐๐ is a parameter of a distribution. Al-though the aerosol particle size distribution is soelusive characteristic of the aerosol, it is still con-venient to introduce it because all properties ofaerosols can be unified in this way.
In some cases the distribution function can befound theoretically on solving dynamic equationsgoverning the time evolution of the particle sizedistribution, but the methods for analyzing theseequations are not yet reliable, not mentioning theinformation on the coefficients entering them. Thisis the reason why the phenomenological distribu-tions are so widely spread.
The Master Equation
In various geophysical problems it is principallyimpossible to exclude the influence of random fac-tors. This means that we have to operate with theprobability of finding the system in a given state,rather than average time (or ensemble) character-istics of the state. Meanwhile, ordinary considera-tions always ignore the deviations from the average
3 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
picture and operate only with the average charac-teristics or lower moments. This fact means thatit is necessary to elaborate the efficient methodsfor consideration of random processes in geophysi-cal systems. For example, global disasters such asearthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes, epidemics, envi-ronmental disasters, etc. result from a coherent in-terplay of random factors. In such cases, the math-ematical description should rely upon other prin-ciples than those widely adopted in modern geo-physics. Specifically, we refuse of the description ofthe state of the system in terms of time dependentaverage distributions and apply the description interms of the occupation numbers. We exemplifyour idea by considering the set of particles of dif-ferent size.
๐ = ๐1, ๐2 . . . ๐๐ . . .
The set changes through time ๐ก. For applicationshowever it is enough to have the average spectrum,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ๐(๐ก) =โ๏ธ๐๐
๐๐(๐)๐ (๐, ๐ก)ฮ(๐๐ โ ๐๐(๐))
where ๐ (๐1, ๐2 . . .) is the probability of realizationof the given set, ๐๐(๐) denotes the number of the๐โobjects in the realization ๐, ฮ stands for theKroneker delta symbol. Of course, it is much moreconvenient to deal with the average spectrum de-pending on one variable. The problem is then fromwhere to get the probability ๐ (๐, ๐ก)?
The dynamics of the system depends on the ratesof transitions between the states ๐. Let us assumethat these rates are known and that they dependon the couple of the states ๐+ and ๐. The de-velopment of the system is then given by the timesequence
๐+ โ ๐โ ๐โ,
i.e., the system jumps from the point of the phasespace ๐+ to point ๐, the to ๐โ etc. It is possibleto write down the equation (the Master equation)governing the the time evolution of the probability๐ (๐, ๐ก).
๐๐ (๐,๐ก)๐๐ก =
โ๏ธ๐+
๐ด(๐+, ๐)๐ (๐+, ๐ก)โ
๐ (๐, ๐ก)โ๏ธ๐โ
๐ด(๐,๐โ)(3)
The first term on the rightโhand side of thisequation is just the rate of transitions from all pos-sible states ๐+ to the state ๐, the second term isresponsible for the losses of the probability becauseof the jumps to all accessible states ๐โ.
Examples of Distributions
We demonstrate first the ideology of the meanfield approach, The simplest example is the pointmoving along ๐ฅ axis with the velocity ๐ฃ(๐ก). Let theaverage velocity be ๐ฃ and otherwise the function๐ฃ(๐ก) is random. Then the natural desire comes upto write the equation of motion in the form,
๐๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ
๐๐ก= ๐ฃ
and to solve it,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) = ๐ฃ๐ก
The result can be compared to the exact solution,
๐ฅ(๐ก) =
๐กโซ๏ธ0
๐ฃ(๐กโฒ)๐๐กโฒ
It is clear that the average ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ can deviate from exactsolution very strongly.
Another example operates with the birth-deathprocess. We consider the evolution of the total size๐(๐ก) of population in a town. Let us introduce birthand death rates (๐ผ and ๐ฝ respectively). Then forthe average size ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) we can write the equation,
๐๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ
๐๐ก= ๐ผ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝโ ๐ฝ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ.
The solution to this equation is well known,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) = ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐๐๐ก,
where ๐ = ๐ผ โ ๐ฝ is the difference between fertil-ity and mortality. If ๐ > 0 the population grows,otherwise (๐ < 0) it diminishes. At ๐ = 0 the pop-ulation does not change and remain equal to ๐0 โits initial size.
4 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
Now let us introduce a random factor. We as-sume that ๐ is distributed over the Gauss low,
๐ (๐) =
โ๏ธ๐
๐๐โ๐๐2
Here ๐ is a constant. Let us calculate the averagesize,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) = ๐0
โ๏ธ๐
๐
โโซ๏ธโโ
๐โ๐๐2+๐๐ก๐๐ (4)
On integrating over ๐ yields,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) = exp(๐ก2/2โ๐)
We see that the random factor decisively changesthe result. The population grows even if the mor-tality exceeds the fertility.
Our next example is a particle jumping over 1Dlattice. The probability per unit time for a jumpbetween neighboring sites is 1/๐ . Then accordingto our ideology we can write,
๐๐
๐๐ก=
1
๐(๐๐โ1 โ๐๐)
where ๐ has the meaning of average time of a singlejump. The Laplace transform ๐ค๐(๐) =
โซ๏ธโ0 ๐๐(๐ก)๐
โ๐๐ก
is determined by the set of algebraic equations,
๐๐ค๐ โ๐๐(0) =1
๐(๐ค๐โ1 โ ๐ค๐) (5)
where ๐๐(0) is the initial probability for the parti-cle to occur at the site ๐. We assume that ๐๐(0) =๐ฟ๐,0, i.e., the particle is initially located at the ori-gin of coordinate. The set Eq. (5) is then readilysolved,
๐ค๐(๐) = (๐+ 1/๐)๐
On inverting this we find,
๐๐(๐ก) =(๐ก/๐)๐
๐!๐โ๐ก/๐
This is the Poisson distribution that emerges in-stead of ๐๐(๐ก) = ฮ(๐โ๐0(๐ก)). Here ๐0(๐ก)1/๐ is theaverage velocity of the particle and ฮ(๐โ๐) standsfor the Kroneker delta (ฮ(0) = 1 and ฮ(๐ฅ) = 0 at๐ฅ ฬธ= 0).
Figure 1. Shown is the lognormal distributionswith ๐ = 1.5 (curve 1), ๐ = 2 (curve 2), and ๐ =2.5 (curve 3). The parameter ๐ defines the width ofthe distribution. The dimensionless size is definedas ๐/๐๐
Lognormal Distribution
The lognormal distribution looks as follows,
๐๐ฟ(๐) =1โ
2๐(๐/๐๐ ) ln๐exp
[๏ธโ 1
2 ln2 ๐ln2
๐
๐๐
]๏ธ(6)
Here ๐ is the particle radius. This distribution de-pends on two parameters: ๐๐ and ๐, where ๐๐ is thecharacteristic particle radius and ๐ (๐ > 1) is thewidth of the distribution. Equation (6) is knownas the lognormal distribution. It is important toemphasize that it is not derived from theoreticalconsiderations. Rather, it is introduced by hands.The function ๐๐ฟ(๐) is shown in Figure 1 for different๐.
Generalized Gamma Distribution
This size distribution is given by the formula:
๐๐บ(๐) =
(๏ธ๐
๐๐
)๏ธ๐ ๐
ฮ((๐ + 1)/๐)exp[โ(๐/๐๐ )
๐ ]
5 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
Figure 2. Shown is the gammaโdistributions withthree sets of parameters i. ๐ = 1, ๐ = 2, ii. ๐ =2, ๐ = 1, and iii. ๐ = 5, ๐ = 2 (curves 1, 2, and3 respectively). These parameters define the shapeof the distribution. Again, the dimensionless sizeis defined as ๐/๐๐
Here ฮ(๐ฅ) is the Euler gammaโfunction. The dis-tribution ๐๐บ depends on three parameters, ๐๐ , ๐and ๐. Figure 2 displays the generalized gamma-distribution for three sets of its parameters.
Once the particle size distributions are known,it is easy to derive the distribution over the valuesdepending only on the particle size;
๐(๐0) =
โซ๏ธ๐ฟ(๐0 โ ๐(๐))๐(๐)
๐๐
๐๐
Here ๐ฟ(๐ฅ) is the Dirac delta function. For example,if we wish to derive the distribution over the par-ticle masses, then ๐(๐) = (4๐๐3/3)๐ , where ๐ isthe density of the particle material. Of course, theproperties of aerosols depend not only on their sizedistributions. The shape of aerosol particles andtheir composition are important factors.
Lognormal distribution often applies in approx-imate calculations of important particle formationprocesses like condensation and coagulation [Bar-rett and Clement, 1991; Friedlander, 2000; Jansonet al., 2001; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998].
Figure 3. An example of the distribution with thealgebraic tail given by Eq. (6) The dimensionlesssize is defined as ๐/๐๐
Scaling and Algebraic Distributions
The distribution ๐๐(๐ฅ) possessing the property
๐๐(๐๐ฅ) = ๐๐๐๐(๐ฅ)
is referred to as the scaling invariant one. The rea-sons for this are apparent: if we change the scaleof ๐ then the distribution preserves its shape butjust acquires the multiplier ๐โ๐. Indeed, ๐(๐ฅ/๐) =๐โ๐๐(๐ฅ). The general solution to this equation is,
๐(๐ฅ) = ๐ด๐ฅโ๐
It is seen that this distribution cannot be normal-ized to 1 at ๐ โฅ 1, because the respective integraldiverges. In order to avoid this difficulty a modifieddistributions is introduced,
๐(๐ฅ) = ๐ด๐ฅโ๐๐โ๐พ๐ฅโ๐
(7)
with ๐ > 0 and
๐ดโ1 = ๐พ(๐+๐+1)/2๐โ1ฮ(๐+ 1/๐)
The exponential multiplier kills the singularity of๐(๐ฅ) at small ๐ฅ. An example of such. distributionis shown in Figure 3 Of course, another suitablefunction can be used instead of the exponent.
6 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
Figure 4. The example of the Student distribu-tion. The parameters are shown in the figure. Thedimensionless size is defined as ๐/๐๐
The Student distribution is well known to all whodeal with the statistical treatment of the result.This distribution looks as follows,
๐(๐ฅ) =2โ
๐๐ต(1/2, ๐/2)
(๏ธ1 +
๐ฅ2
๐
)๏ธโ(๐+1)/2
It reveals the algebraic behavior at large ๐ฅ. Here๐ต(๐ฅ, ๐ฆ) is the Euler beta function. Figure 4 displaysthe Student distribution for ๐ = 3.
Extended Poissonโs Distribution
Here we consider the simplest process that gen-erates the Poisson distribution. The example givenbelow is adopted from the demography but manysimilar processes are met in the geophysics.
The Malthus balance (the birth-death process๐ โ 1 โ ๐ โ ๐1) is so primitive that nobody sus-pects that something unusual can stay behind. Toour great surprise, it is not so, and an alternativeconsideration starting with the same idea that thechange in population size comes from the differ-ence between the birth and the death rates leads torather unusual probability distribution of the sizes,although from the first sight, nothing except for
the Poisson distribution is expected. The reality,however, occurs more complex.
First of all, let us formulate the balance equationfor the probability ๐ค(๐, ๐ก) to find ๐ individuals inthe population at time ๐ก assuming the rates of thebirthโdeath process to be linear in ๐. This equationclaims,
๐๐ค(๐,๐ก)๐๐ก = ฮบ[(๐โ 1)๐ค(๐โ 1, ๐ก)โ ๐๐ค(๐, ๐ก)]โ
๐[(๐+ 1)๐ค(๐+ 1, ๐ก)โ ๐๐ค(๐, ๐ก)].(8)
The rightโhand side (RHS) of this equation de-scribes the jumps ๐ โ 1 โโ ๐ (the birth process)and ๐ + 1 โโ ๐ (the death process) that changethe population size by ยฑ1 respectively.
In order to solve Eq. (8) we introduce the gener-ating function for ๐ค(๐, ๐ก),
๐น (๐ง, ๐ก) =
โโ๏ธ๐=0
๐ค(๐, ๐ก)๐ง๐.
On multiplying both sides of Eq. (4) by ๐ง๐ andsumming over all ๐ yield the firstโorder partial dif-ferential equation for ๐น (๐ง, ๐ก),
๐๐น
๐๐ก= (๐ง โ 1)(ฮบ๐ง โ ๐)
๐๐น
๐๐ง. (9)
It is easy to check that the general solution toEq. (6) has the form:
๐น (๐ง, ๐ก) = ๐
(๏ธ1โ ๐ง
๐โ ฮบ๐ง๐๐๐ก
)๏ธ. (10)
The function ๐ should be determined from the ini-tial condition ๐น (๐ง, 0) = ๐น0(๐ง) or
๐น0(๐ง) = ๐
(๏ธ1โ ๐ง
๐โ ฮบ๐ง
)๏ธ.
We introduce ๐ง(๐) as the solution to the equation๐ = (1โ ๐ง)/(๐โ ฮบ๐ง). Hence,
๐ง(๐) =1โ ๐๐
1โ ฮบ๐
and
๐(๐) = ๐น0
(๏ธ1โ ๐๐
1โ ฮบ๐
)๏ธ. (11)
On substituting ๐ = [(1 โ ๐ง)/(๐ โ ฮบ๐ง)]๐๐๐ก fromEq.(10) into Eq. (11) finally yields,
7 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
๐น (๐ง, ๐ก) = ๐น0
(๏ธ๐โ ฮบ๐ง โ ๐(1โ ๐ง)๐๐๐ก
๐โ ฮบ๐ง โ ฮบ(1โ ๐ง)๐๐๐ก
)๏ธ.
For further analysis it is more convenient to havethe generating function ๐น (๐ง, ๐ก) in the form:
๐น (๐ง, ๐ก) = ๐น0
โโโ๐ด+๐๐ง
1โ ๐ง
๐ง0
โโโ . (12)
Here
๐ด =๐(๐๐๐ก โ 1)
ฮบ๐๐๐ก โ ๐, ๐ =
๐2๐๐๐ก
(ฮบ๐๐๐ก โ ๐)2,
and
๐ง0 =ฮบ๐๐๐ก โ ๐
ฮบ(๐๐๐ก โ 1)
It is important to note that above three func-tions are always positive because sgn(๐๐๐ก โ 1) =sgn(ฮบ๐๐๐ก โ ๐) = sgn(ฮบ โ ๐). Here sgn(๐ฅ) = 1 atpositive ๐ฅ and sgn(๐ฅ) = โ1 otherwise.
It is easy to find two first moments of ๐ค(๐, ๐ก).On differentiating Eq. (6) once over ๐ง and putting๐ง = 1 reproduce Eq. (11) for ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) =
โ๏ธ๐ ๐๐ค(๐, ๐ก) =
๐๐ง๐น (1, ๐ก). Repeating this operation gives the closedequation for ๐2๐ง๐ง๐น |๐ง=1 = ฮฆ2(๐ก) =
โ๏ธ๐(๐
2โ๐)๐ค(๐, ๐ก),
๐ฮฆ2
๐๐ก= 2๐ฮฆ2 + 2ฮบ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ.
The solution to this equation is,
ฮฆ2(๐ก) =
(๏ธฮฆ2,0
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ20+
2ฮบ๐๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0
)๏ธ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ2(๐ก)โ 2ฮบ
๐๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก). (13)
Let us analyze the initial Poissonโs distribution.In this case ฮฆ2,0 = ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ20. We calculate the differenceฮ = ๐2(๐ก)โ ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ2(๐ก). This difference is readily foundfrom Eq. (13),
ฮ(๐ก) = ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก)
[๏ธ1 +
2ฮบ๐
(๐๐๐ก โ 1)
]๏ธ.
It is interesting to note that ฮ(๐ก) grows linearlywith time as ๐ โโ 0, ฮ(๐ก) = ๐0(1 + 2ฮบ๐ก), whereasthe total population size does not change.
Of great interest is thus to find the time depen-dence of the distribution explicitly. To this end weapply Eq. (12) to the function
๐น0(๐ง) = ๐๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0(๐งโ1). (14)
This initial generating function corresponds to thePoisson distribution Eq. (1)
The size distribution ๐ค(๐, ๐ก) is expressed throughthe contour integral of ๐น (๐ง, ๐ก),
๐ค(๐, ๐ก) =1
2๐๐
โฎ๏ธ๐น (๐ง, ๐ก)
๐ง๐+1๐๐ง. (15)
The integration goes counterclockwise along thecontour surrounding the origin of coordinates inthe complex plane ๐ง. On applying Eq. (4) to ๐น0(๐ง)given by Eq. (14) and substituting the result intoEq. (15) yield,
๐ค(๐, ๐ก) =1
2๐๐๐โ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐(๐ก)
โฎ๏ธexp
โโโ ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐ง๐(๐ก)
1โ ๐ง
๐ง0
โโโ ๐๐ง
๐ง๐+1,
(16)where
๐(๐ก) = [๐ด(๐ก)โ 1] =๐๐๐๐ก
ฮบ๐๐๐ก โ ๐.
The function ๐(๐ก) โฅ 0.The integration in Eq. (16) is readily performed
to give
1
2๐๐
โฎ๏ธexp
โโโ ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐ง๐(๐ก)
1โ ๐ง
๐ง0
โโโ ๐๐ง
๐ง๐+1= โ๐(๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐๐ง0), (17)
where โ๐(๐ฅ) are the polynomials of the ๐โth orderthat can be expressed through Laguerreโs polyno-mials ๐ฟ๐(๐ฅ) as follows:
โ๐(๐ฅ) = ๐ฟ๐(โ๐ง0๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐)โ ๐ฟ๐โ1(โ๐ง0๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐),
where
๐ฟ๐ (๐ฅ) =๐๐ฅ
๐ !
๐๐
๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฅ๐ ๐โ๐ฅ.
In deriving Eq. (17) we used the fact that
(1โ ๐ง)โ1 exp(๐ฅ๐ง/(๐ง โ 1)) =
โโ๏ธ๐=1
๐ฟ๐(๐ฅ)๐ง๐
8 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
Figure 5. This figure displays the nor-mal distribution for three sets of parame-ters. The dimensionless size is defined as๐/๐๐
is the generating function for the Laguerre polyno-mials ๐ฟ๐ (๐ฅ) [Lushnikov and Kagan, 2016].
From Eqs (16) and (17) we finally have,
๐ค(๐, ๐ก) = ๐โ๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐๐งโ๐0 โ๐(๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ0๐๐ง0).
Normal Distribution
Let us consider a collection of sites occupied by๐1, ๐2 . . . ๐๐บ elements These occupation numbersare considered as random variables. Let the to-tal number of the elements is fixed and equal to ๐พ.Let us try to find the probability to find ๐ (๐) theprobability to have exactly ๐ units in one of thesite.
๐ (๐) =โ๏ธ
ฮ(๐1 + ๐2 + . . . ๐๐ โ๐พ) (18)
where ฮ(๐) = 1 at ๐ = 0 and ฮ(๐) = 0 otherwise.The summation on the right-hand side of Eq. (18)
goes over all sites except the site with number ๐.Of course, the final result is independent of ๐. Weapply the integral representation of ฮ(๐).
ฮ(๐) =1
2๐๐
โฎ๏ธ๐๐ง
๐ง๐+1
where the integration contour surrounds the point๐ง = 0 and the integration goes in the counterclock-wise direction. Then we have instead of Eq. (18),
๐ (๐) =1
2๐๐
โฎ๏ธ โ๏ธ ๐๐ง
๐ง๐+1=
1
2๐๐
โฎ๏ธ๐๐ง
๐ง๐พ+1๐น๐พ(๐ง)
(19)where
๐น (๐ง) =1
2๐๐
โฎ๏ธ๐๐ง
๐(๐ง)
At large ๐ the integral in Eq. (19) can be eval-uated by the saddle point method. the result hasthe well familiar form:
๐ (๐) =1โ2๐๐2
exp
(๏ธโ(๐ฅโ ๐ฅ0)
2
2๐
)๏ธTht normal distribution is shown in Figure 5.
Scaling Distributions
Let us consider the distributions evolving withtime. A simplest example is the diffusion of aerosolparticles in the atmosphere. This process is gov-erned by the wellโknown diffusion equation,
๐๐
๐๐ก= ๐ท
๐2๐
๐๐ฅ2(20)
Here ๐ก is time, ๐ฅ is the spatial coordinate of parti-cle, ๐ท is the diffusivity of the particle. The solu-tion to this equation should depend a dimension-less group composed the values entering the diffu-sion equation. The only dimensionless combinationcomposed of time, coordinate, and the diffusivity is๐ = ๐ฅ2/๐ท๐ก. Therefore
๐ (๐ฅ, ๐ก) = ๐(๐ฅ2/๐ท๐ก) (21)
The function ๐(๐) can be found by substitutingEq. (21) into Eq. (20). The final answer is,
๐(๐) =1โ2๐๐
๐๐2/2. (22)
A hundred years ago Smoluchowski (see [Fried-lander, 2000]) formulated his salient equation thatdescribes the coagulation process in aerosols. Sincethen the Smoluchowski approach found wide ap-plications in numerous areas of physics, chemistry,
9 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
economy, epidemiology, and many other branchesof science [Adams and Seinfeld, 2002; Janson et al.,2001; Leyvraz, 2003; Pruppacher and Klett, 2006;Schmeltzer et al., 1999; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998;Seinfeld, 2008].
From the first sight the coagulation process looksrather offenceless, a system of ๐ monomeric ob-jects begins to evolve by pair coalescence of ๐โ and๐โmers according to the scheme,
(๐) + (๐) โโ (๐ + ๐).
And there is not a problem to write down the ki-netic equation governing the process, everyone cando it,
๐๐๐๐๐ก
= ๐ผ +1
2
๐โซ๏ธ0
๐พ(๐ โ ๐, ๐)๐๐โ๐๐๐๐๐โ
๐๐
โโซ๏ธ๐=0
๐พ(๐, ๐)๐๐๐๐. (23)
This is the famous Smoluchowskiโs equation. Herethe coagulation kernel ๐พ(๐, ๐) is the transition ratefor the process given by Eq. (22) which is assumedto br a homogeneous function of its arguments๐พ(๐๐, ๐๐) = ๐๐๐พ(๐, ๐). The first term on the rightโhand side (RHS) of Eq. (2) describes the gain inthe ๐โmer concentration ๐๐(๐ก) due to coalescence of(๐โ ๐)โ and ๐โmers, while the second one is respon-sible for the losses of ๐โmers due to their stickingto all other particles. In what follows we will usethe dimensionless version of this equation, i.e., allconcentrations are measured in units of the initialmonomer concentration ๐0 and the time in unitsof 1/๐0๐พ(1, 1). More details can be found in thereview article [Leyvraz, 2003].
Here we consider a stationary version of thisequation: we put ๐๐ก๐ = 0 and, in addition, considera simplified version of the kernel ๐พ(๐, ๐) = ๐๐ผ๐๐ผ. Inthis case Eq. (23) can be solved exactly. The resultis,
๐๐ = ๐ด๐3/2+๐ผ
where ๐ด is a constant.
Random Factors and Distributions
The random factors can affect the geophysicalprocesses and change the shapes of the distribution.Here we consider two examples.
BirthโDeath Process
Let the population growth is governed by theMalthus equation .
๐๐
๐๐ก= ๐ ๐โ ๐๐ = ๐๐
with ๐(๐ก) being the mean population size at time ๐ก,๐ and ๐ are the birth and death rates respectivelyand ๐ = ๐ โ๐ being the growth rate coefficient. Thepopulation size grows at ๐ > 0 or falls at ๐ < 0)
๐ = ๐0๐๐๐ก
Let us assume now that the rate coefficient is arandom value distributed over the Gauss law
๐ (๐) = ๐ด exp[โ๐(๐โ ๐0)2]
where ๐ด =โ๏ธ๐/๐ is the normalization coefficient
and ๐ is a dispersion parameter The distribution๐ (๐) is normalized to 1, i.e.,.
โซ๏ธ โ
โโ๐ (๐)๐๐ = 1
We average ๐(๐ก) over the distribution ๐ and find,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) = ๐ด๐0
โซ๏ธ โ
โโ๐ (๐)๐๐๐ก๐๐ = ๐0๐
๐0๐ก๐๐ก2/4๐
Hence, irrespective of the value of mean fertility thepopulation swiftly grows The distribution functionfor ๐ can also be readily found. It is,
๐ค(๐, ๐ก) =
โ๏ธ๐
๐
โซ๏ธ โ
โโ๐ (๐)๐ฟ(๐โ ๐0๐
๐๐ก)๐๐
The integration gives the lognormal distribution
๐ค(๐, ๐ก) =
โ๏ธ๐
๐
1
๐ก๐exp
[๏ธโ ๐
๐ก2ln2(๐/๐0)
]๏ธ
10 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
Figure 6. Time dependence of the size in the caseof logistic distribution. The parameters are shownin the figure.
Logistic Model
Let us consider now the logistic growth
๐๐
๐๐ก= ๐ ๐โ ๐ฝ๐2 โ ๐๐ = ๐๐โ ๐ฝ๐2
It is readily seen that the average population size
๐
๐โ ๐ฝ๐= ๐ถ๐๐๐ก
or
๐(๐ก) =๐0๐
๐ฅ
1 + ๐ฝ๐0๐ก๐น (๐ฅ)
where
๐น (๐ฅ) =๐๐ฅ โ 1
๐ฅ๐ฅ = ๐๐ก
Now let us average this over the Gauss distributioncentered at ๐ = ๐0.
๐(๐ก) =๐0๐
๐๐ก
1 + ๐ฝ๐01โexp(๐๐ก)
๐
=๐0๐
๐๐ก
1 + ๐ฝ๐0๐ก๐น (๐๐ก)
where ๐น (๐ฅ) = (1โ ๐๐ฅ)/๐ฅ. On averaging this gives,
๏ฟฝฬ๏ฟฝ(๐ก) = ๐0
โซ๏ธ๐ (๐)
๐๐๐ก
1 + ๐ฝ๐0๐ก๐น (๐๐ก)๐๐ก
For the logistic law the result is more complicatedthan in the case of the Malthus distribution
๐ค(๐) =
โซ๏ธ๐ (๐)๐ฟ
[๏ธ๐โ ๐0๐
๐๐ก
1 + ๐ฝ๐0๐ก๐น (๐๐ก)
]๏ธ๐๐
Time dependence of the population size is shown inFigure 6.
Conclusion
We have presented several types of probabilitydistributions widely used in geophysics (and notonly) We have classified the geophysical randomprocesses into two groups. The first group operateswith random processes having a dominant structurei.e.,those including a deterministic process possess-ing all the feature of the whole process. In this casethe task of the statistical study can be reduced tothe search of this dominant process and the studythe respective deterministic model underlying it.The randomness in this case reveals itself as cor-rections to the dominant process and plays the mi-nor role. The example of such process is the waveson the oceanic surface or mountains on the Earthsurface.
More sophisticated tasks appear in the cases wherethe dominant absents. The simplest example is therandom walks of a billiard ball. Its coordinate ofits stops cannot be predicted, neither its associatedwith some regular trajectories. It is clear that whensuch situations emerge we should attack it by usingthe probabilistic approaches
In both these cases the description goes in termsof the distributions. Sometimes these distributioncan be found theoretically. If not, then we canchose a distribution from our collection and to tryto match its parameters in such a way that the av-erage characteristics would be reproduced.
Acknowledgment. This work was carried out withinthe project of the fundamental research program of RASPresidium No. 2 with financial support by the Ministryof Science and Higher Education of the Russian Feder-ation.
11 of 12
ES6010lushnikov and bogoutdinov: introduction to geophysical distributions ES6010
References
Adams, P. J., J. H. Seinfeld (2002), Predictingglobal aerosol size distribution in general circulationmodels, J. Geophys. Res., 107, No. D19, 4370,Crossref
Bailey, N. T. J. (1964), The Elements of StochasticProcesses, With Applications to Natural Sciences, 130pp. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkโLondonโSydney.
Barrett, J. C., C. F. Clement (1991), Aerosolconcentrations from a burst of nucleation, J. AerosolSci., 22, 327โ335, Crossref
Ding, R., J. Li (2007), Nonlinear finite-timeLyapunov exponent and predictability, Phys. Lett.A, 364, 396โ400, Crossref
Eckmann, J.-P., D. Ruelle (1985), Ergodic theoryof chaos and strange attractors, Rev. Modern Phys.,57, 617โ656, Crossref
Friedlander, S. K. (2000), Smoke, Dust and Haze:Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics (2nd Edition),Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Golubkov, G. V., M. G. Golubkov, G. K. Ivanov(2010), Rydberg states of atoms and molecules ina field of neutral particles, The Atmosphere and Iono-sphere: Dynamics, Processes and Monitoring, By-chkov V. L., Golubkov G. V. and Nikitin A. I. (eds.)p. 1โ67, Springer, New York. Crossref
Golubkov, G. V., M. G. Golubkov, M. I. Manzhelii,et al. (2014), Optical quantum proper-ties of GPS signal propagation medium โ ๐ท layer,The Atmosphere and Ionosphere: Elementary Pro-cesses, Monitoring, and Ball Lightning, Bychkov V.L., Golubkov G. V. and Nikitin A. I. (eds.) p. 1โ68,Springer, New York.
Janson, R., K. Rozman, A. Karlsson, H.-C. Hansson(2001), Biogenic emission and gaseous precursorto forest aerosols, Tellus, 53B, 423โ440, Crossref
Julanov, Yu. V., A. A. Lushnikov, I. A. Nevskii(1983), Statistics of particle counting in highlyconcentrated disperse systems, DAN SSSR, 270,1140.
Julanov, Yu. V., A. A. Lushnikov, I. A. Nevskii(1984), Statistics of Multiple Counting in AerosolCounters, J. Aerosol Sci., 15, 69โ79, Crossref
Julanov, Yu. V., A. A. Lushnikov, I. A. Nevskii(1986), Statistics of Multiple Counting II. Con-centration Counters, J. Aerosol Sci., 17, 87โ93,Crossref
Klyatskin, V. I. (2005), Stochastic Equationsthrough the Eye of the Physicist: Basic Concepts, Ex-act Results and Asymptotic Approximations, 556 pp.Elsevier, Amsterdam. Crossref
Leyvraz, F. (2003), Scaling theory and exactlysolved models in the kinetics of irreversible aggrega-tion, Phys. Rep., 383, 95โ212, Crossref
Lushnikov, A. A., J. S. Bhatt, I. J. Ford (2003),Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics in ultrafineaerosols, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 1117โ1133, Crossref
Lushnikov, A. A., A. S. Kagan (2016), A linearmodel of population dynamics, Int. J. Mod. Phys.B, 30, No. 15, 1541008, Crossref
Mazo, R. M. (2002), Brownian Motion: Fluctua-tions, Dynamics, and Applications, Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.
McKibben, M. A. (2011), Discovering EvolutionEquations with Applications: Volume 2. StochasticEquations, 463 pp. Chapman & Hall/CRC, NewYork.
Michael, A. J. (2012), Fundamental questions ofearthquake statistics, source behavior, and the esti-mation of earthquake probabilities from possible fore-shocks, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of Amer-ica, 102, No. 6, 2547, Crossref
Pruppacher, H. R., J. D. Klett (2006), Micro-physics of clouds and precipitation, Kluwer Academic,New York.
Schmeltzer, J., G. Rโopke, R. Mahnke (1999), Ag-gregation Phenomena in Complex Systems, WileyโVCH, Weinbeim.
Seinfeld, J. H. (2008), Climate Change, Review ofChemical Engineering, 24, No. 1, 1โ65, Crossref
Seinfeld, J. H., S. N. Pandis (1998), Atmo-spheric Chemistry and Physics, John Wiley & Sons,Inc., New York.
Van Kampen, N. G. (2007), Stochastic Processesin Physics and Chemistry, 464 pp. Elsevier, Am-sterdam.
Zagaynov, V. A., A. A. Lushnikov, O. N. Nikitin, etal. (1989), Background aerosol over lake ofBaikal, DAN SSSR, 308, 1087.
Corresponding author:A. A. Lushnikov, Geophysical Center of the Rus-
sian Academy of Sciences (GC RAS), Moscow, Russia.([email protected])
12 of 12