Amalgam
-
Upload
pkgargiitkgp -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Amalgam
By: Naghman Zuberi
Dental AmalgamDental Amalgam
Naghman Zuberi 2
Overview• Basic composition• Basic setting reactions• Classifications• Manufacturing• Variables in amalgam
performance
Naghman Zuberi 3
Amalgam
• An alloy of mercury with another metal.
Naghman Zuberi 4
Why Amalgam?
• Inexpensive• Ease of use• Proven track record
– >100 years• Familiarity• Resin-free
– less allergies than composite
Naghman Zuberi 5
Constituents in Amalgam• Basic
– Silver– Tin– Copper– Mercury
• Other– Zinc– Indium– Palladium
Naghman Zuberi 6
Basic Constituents
• Silver (Ag)– increases strength– increases expansion
• Tin (Sn)– decreases expansion– decreased strength– increases setting time
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 7
Basic Constituents• Copper (Cu)
– ties up tin• reducing gamma-2 formation
– increases strength– reduces tarnish and corrosion– reduces creep
• reduces marginal deterioration
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 8
Basic Constituents• Mercury (Hg)
– activates reaction– only pure metal that is liquid
at room temperature– spherical alloys
• require less mercury– smaller surface area easier to wet
» 40 to 45% Hg
– admixed alloys• require more mercury
– lathe-cut particles more difficult to wet» 45 to 50% Hg
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 9
Other Constituents• Zinc (Zn)
– used in manufacturing• decreases oxidation of other elements
– sacrificial anode
– provides better clinical performance• less marginal breakdown
– Osborne JW Am J Dent 1992
– causes delayed expansion with low Cu alloys• if contaminated with moisture during condensation
– Phillips RW JADA 1954
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
H2O + Zn ZnO + H2
Naghman Zuberi 10
Other Constituents• Indium (In)
– decreases surface tension• reduces amount of mercury necessary• reduces emitted mercury vapor
– reduces creep and marginal breakdown– increases strength– must be used in admixed alloys– example
• Indisperse (Indisperse Distributing Company)– 5% indium
Powell J Dent Res 1989
Naghman Zuberi 11
Other Constituents• Palladium (Pd)
– reduced corrosion– greater luster– example
• Valiant PhD (Ivoclar Vivadent)– 0.5% palladium
Mahler J Dent Res 1990
Naghman Zuberi 12
Basic Composition• A silver-mercury matrix containing filler
particles of silver-tin• Filler (bricks)
– Ag3Sn called gamma• can be in various shapes
– irregular (lathe-cut), spherical,or a combination
• Matrix– Ag2Hg3 called gamma 1
• cement– Sn8Hg called gamma 2
• voids
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 13
Basic Setting Reactions
• Conventional low-copper alloys• Admixed high-copper alloys• Single composition high-copper alloys
Naghman Zuberi 14
• Dissolution and precipitation• Hg dissolves Ag and Sn
from alloy• Intermetallic compounds
formed Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-Sn Alloy
Mercury(Hg)
AgAgAg
Sn
SnSn
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
Hg Hg
AgAg33Sn + HgSn + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag22HgHg33 + Sn+ Sn88HgHg
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1 2
Naghman Zuberi 15
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
• Gamma () = Ag3Sn– unreacted alloy– strongest phase and
corrodes the least– forms 30% of volume
of set amalgamAg-SnAlloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-Sn Alloy
Mercury
AgAgAg
Sn
SnSn
HgHg
Hg
AgAg33Sn + HgSn + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag22HgHg33 + Sn+ Sn88HgHg
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1 2
Naghman Zuberi 16
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys
• Gamma 1 (1) = Ag2Hg3– matrix for unreacted alloy
and 2nd strongest phase– 10 micron grains
binding gamma ()
– 60% of volume
1
AgAg33Sn + HgSn + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag22HgHg33 + Sn+ Sn88HgHg
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1 2
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Naghman Zuberi 17
Conventional Low-Copper Alloys• Gamma 2 (2) = Sn8Hg
– weakest and softest phase– corrodes fast, voids form– corrosion yields Hg which
reacts with more gamma ()
– 10% of volume– volume decreases with time
due to corrosion
AgAg33Sn + HgSn + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag22HgHg33 + Sn+ Sn88HgHg
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1 2
2
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Naghman Zuberi 18
Admixed High-Copper Alloys
• Ag enters Hg from Ag-Cuspherical eutectic particles– eutectic
• an alloy in which the elementsare completely soluble in liquidsolution but separate into distinctareas upon solidification
• Both Ag and Sn enter Hgfrom Ag3Sn particles
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag--Cu + HgCu + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag--Cu + AgCu + Ag22HgHg33 + Cu+ Cu66SnSn55 1
Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Mercury
AgAgAg
SnSn
Ag-Cu Alloy
AgHgHg
Naghman Zuberi 19
Admixed High-Copper Alloys
• Sn diffuses to surface ofAg-Cu particles– reacts with Cu to form
(eta) Cu6Sn5 ()• around unconsumed
Ag-Cu particles
Ag-SnAlloy
Ag-Cu Alloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag--Cu + HgCu + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag--Cu + AgCu + Ag22HgHg33 + Cu+ Cu66SnSn55 1
Naghman Zuberi 20
Admixed High-Copper Alloys
• Gamma 1 (1) (Ag2Hg3)surrounds () eta phase(Cu6Sn5) and gamma ()alloy particles (Ag3Sn) Ag-Sn
Alloy
1
Ag-Cu Alloy
Ag-SnAlloy
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag--Cu + HgCu + Hg AgAg33Sn + AgSn + Ag--Cu + AgCu + Ag22HgHg33 + Cu+ Cu66SnSn55 1
Naghman Zuberi 21
Single CompositionHigh-Copper Alloys
• Gamma sphere () (Ag3Sn)with epsilon coating ()(Cu3Sn)
• Ag and Sn dissolve in Hg
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-Sn AlloyAg-Sn Alloy
Mercury (Hg)
Ag
SnAg
Sn
AgAg33Sn + CuSn + Cu33Sn + HgSn + Hg AgAg33Sn + CuSn + Cu33Sn + AgSn + Ag22HgHg33 + Cu+ Cu66SnSn55
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1
Naghman Zuberi 22
Single CompositionHigh-Copper Alloys
• Gamma 1 (1) (Ag2Hg3) crystalsgrow binding together partially-dissolved gamma () alloyparticles (Ag3Sn)
• Epsilon () (Cu3Sn) developscrystals on surface ofgamma particle (Ag3Sn)in the form of eta () (Cu6Sn5)
– reduces creep– prevents gamma-2 formation
Ag-Sn Alloy
Ag-Sn AlloyAg-Sn Alloy
1
AgAg33Sn + CuSn + Cu33Sn + HgSn + Hg AgAg33Sn + CuSn + Cu33Sn + AgSn + Ag22HgHg33 + Cu+ Cu66SnSn55
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1
Naghman Zuberi 23
Classifications• Based on copper content• Based on particle shape• Based on method of adding
copper
Naghman Zuberi 24
Copper Content
• Low-copper alloys– 4 to 6% Cu
• High-copper alloys– thought that 6% Cu was maximum amount
• due to fear of excessive corrosion and expansion– Now contain 9 to 30% Cu
• at expense of Ag
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 25
Particle Shape• Lathe cut
– low Cu– high Cu
• Admixture– high Cu
• Spherical– low Cu– high Cu
Naghman Zuberi 26
Method of Adding Copper• Single Composition Lathe-Cut (SCL)• Single Composition Spherical (SCS)• Admixture: Lathe-cut + Spherical Eutectic (ALE)• Admixture: Lathe-cut + Single Composition
Spherical (ALSCS)
Naghman Zuberi 27
Single Composition Lathe-Cut(SCL)
• More Hg needed than spherical alloys• High condensation force needed due to
lathe cut• 20% Cu
Naghman Zuberi 28
Single Composition Spherical(SCS)
• Spherical particles wet easier with Hg– less Hg needed (42%)
• Less condensation force, larger condenser• Gamma particles as 20 micron spheres
– with epsilon layer on surface
Naghman Zuberi 29
Admixture:Lathe-cut + Spherical Eutectic
(ALE)• Composition
– 2/3 conventional lathe cut (3% Cu)– 1/3 high Cu spherical eutectic (28% Cu)– overall 12% Cu, 1% Zn
• Initial reaction produces gamma 2– no gamma 2 within two years
Naghman Zuberi 30
Admixture:Lathe-cut + Single Composition
Spherical (ALSCS)• High Cu in both lathe-cut and spherical
components– 19% Cu
• Epsilon layer forms on both components• 0.5% palladium added
– reinforce grain boundaries on gamma 1
Naghman Zuberi 31
Manufacturing Process• Lathe-cut alloys
– Ag & Sn melted together– alloy cooled
• phases solidify– heat treat
• 400 ºC for 8 hours– grind, then mill to 25 - 50 microns– heat treat to release stresses of grinding
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 32
Manufacturing Process
• Spherical alloys– melt alloy– atomize
• spheres form as particles cool– sizes range from 5 - 40 microns
• variety improves condensability
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 33
Material-Related Variables
• Dimensional change• Strength• Corrosion• Creep
Naghman Zuberi 34
Dimensional Change• Most high-copper amalgams undergo a
net contraction• Contraction leaves marginal gap
– initial leakage• post-operative sensitivity
– reduced with corrosion over time
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 35
Dimensional Change• Net contraction
– type of alloy• spherical alloys have more
contraction– less mercury
– condensation technique• greater condensation = higher contraction
– trituration time• overtrituration causes higher contraction
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 36
Strength• Develops slowly
– 1 hr: 40 to 60% of maximum– 24 hrs: 90% of maximum
• Spherical alloys strengthen faster– require less mercury
• Higher compressive vs. tensile strength• Weak in thin sections
– unsupported edges fracture
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 37
Corrosion• Reduces strength• Seals margins
– low copper• 6 months
– SnO2, SnCl– gamma-2 phase
– high copper• 6 - 24 months
– SnO2 , SnCl, CuCl– eta-phase (Cu6Sn5)
Sutow J Dent Res 1991
Naghman Zuberi 38
Creep• Slow deformation of amalgam placed under
a constant load– load less than that necessary to produce
fracture• Gamma 2 dramatically affects creep rate
– slow strain rates produces plastic deformation• allows gamma-1 grains to slide
• Correlates with marginal breakdown
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 39
Creep• High-copper amalgams have creep
resistance– prevention of gamma-2 phase
• requires >12% Cu total– single composition spherical
• eta (Cu6Sn5) embedded in gamma-1 grains– interlock
– admixture• eta (Cu6Sn5) around Ag-Cu particles
– improves bonding to gamma 1
Naghman Zuberi 40
Dentist-Controlled Variables
• Manipulation– trituration– condensation– burnishing– polishing
Naghman Zuberi 41
Trituration• Mixing time
– refer to manufacturerrecommendations
• Click here for details
• Overtrituration– “hot” mix
• sticks to capsule– decreases working / setting time– slight increase in setting contraction
• Undertrituration– grainy, crumbly mix
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 42
Condensation• Forces
– lathe-cut alloys• small condensers• high force
– spherical alloys• large condensers• less sensitive to amount of force• vertical / lateral with vibratory motion
– admixture alloys• intermediate handling between lathe-cut and spherical
Naghman Zuberi 43
Burnishing
• Pre-carve– removes excess mercury– improves margin adaptation
• Post-carve– improves smoothness
• Combined– less leakage
Ben-Amar Dent Mater 1987
Naghman Zuberi 44
Early Finishing
• After initial set– prophy cup with pumice– provides initial smoothness to restorations– recommended for spherical amalgams
Naghman Zuberi 45
Polishing
• Increased smoothness• Decreased plaque retention• Decreased corrosion• Clinically effective?
– no improvement in marginal integrity• Mayhew Oper Dent 1986• Collins J Dent 1992
Naghman Zuberi 46
Alloy Selection
• Handling characteristics• Mechanical and physical
properties• Clinical performance
Naghman Zuberi 47
Handling Characteristics• Spherical
– advantages• easier to condense
– around pins• hardens rapidly• smoother polish
– disadvantages• difficult to achieve tight contacts• higher tendency for overhangs
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Naghman Zuberi 48
Handling Characteristics• Admixed
– advantages• easy to achieve tight contacts• good polish
– disadvantages• hardens slowly
– lower early strength
Naghman Zuberi 49
Amalgam PropertiesCompressive
Strength (MPa)% Creep Tensile
Strength(24 hrs) (MPa)
Amalgam Type 1 hr 7 days
Low Copper1 145 343 2.0 60
Admixture2 137 431 0.4 48
SingleComposition3
262 510 0.13 64
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
1Fine Cut, Caulk2 Dispersalloy, Caulk3Tytin, Kerr
Naghman Zuberi 50
Thanks A Lot