AKI POSTER

2
RIFLE CLASS RIFLE GFR Criteria UO Criteria AKIN GFR CRITERIA AKIN CLASS RISK Increase Cr × 1.5 Or GFR decreases >25% UO < 0.5 ml/kg/hr × 6 hr Increase Cr × 1.5 Or 0.3 mg/dl STAGE 1 INJURY Increase Cr × 2 Or GFR decreases > 50% UO < 0.5 ml/kg/hr × 12 hr Increase Cr × 2 STAGE 2 FAILURE Increase Cr × 3 Or GFR decreases > 75% Or Cr 4mg/dl ( with acute rise of 0.5 mg/dl) UO < 0.3 ml/kg/hr × 24 hr Or  Anuria × 12 hr Increase Cr × 3 Or Cr 4mg/dl ( with acute rise of 0.5 mg/dl) STAGE 3 LOSS Complete loss of renal function for > 4 weeks ESRD END STAGE RENAL DISEASES T able-4 : RIFLE v/s AKIN differen ces  ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN POST -OP NEUROSURGERY P A TIENTS IN ICU: A COMPARISON BETWEEN RIFLE AND AKIN CLASSIFICATIONS Dr. V idit J oshi 1  Col(Dr) R Ramprasad 2 , Brig (Dr)G S Ramesh 3  1 Resident Anesthesiology , AFMC Pune. 2 Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology AFMC Pune 3 Professor & HOD, Department of Anaesthesiology AFMC Pune 1.To study the incidence of AKI in post op Neurosurgery patients in ICU using RIFLE & AKIN criteria 2.To note whether there are differences in identification of Acute Kidney injury in post- op Neurosurgery patients in ICU using RIFLE and AKIN criteria 3.To study, associated risk factors in the development of AKI Objectives Acknowledgement References Discussion Introduction Observation Sr No. Criteria AKIN RIFLE 1 Sr Creatinine changes Change Within a 48- hour Over a one-week period from Baseline 3 Absolute S.Cr increment in Stage 1 Rise of 0.3 mg/dL in 48 hrs - 4 Renal replacement therapy Stage 3 No severity class assigned   Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly seen in the perioperative period and in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, high morbidity and mortality. 1 To date, there is no universally accepted definition for acute kidney dysfunction. The criteria for AKI was first published with acronym RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage renal failure), to overcome different definitions for AKI 2 More recently, a modified version was proposed by the Acute Kidney injury Network (AKIN) 3   Neurosurgical patients are more prone to kidney stress due to blood loss & major fluid shift, water imbalance in peri-op period and excessive use of diuretics.  Materials & Methods Results T able-3 :RIFLE & AKIN criteria  Study Design: Prospective observational study Study Place: ICU CH(SC), AFMC, Pune Study Population: All adult Neurosurgical patients with ICU admission post-op for > 24 hrs Study Period: DEC 2012 - SEPT 2013 Sample Size: 72 patient  All patients assessed daily for 7 post-op day using both the RIFLE and AKIN criteria MALE 43 (60%) FEMALE 29 (40%) Figure-1: Distribution accordin g to Sex Non AKI 48 (67%) Stage 1 19 (26%) Stage 2 1 (1%) Stage 3 4 (6%) Figure-3: Incidence of AKI by AKIN No AKI 57 (79%) RISK 10 (14%) Injury 3 (4%) Failure 2 (3%) Figure-4: Incidence of AKI by RIFLE criteria 15 23 10 19 5 4 0 5 10 15 20 25 RIFLE AKIN Figure-7: PROGRESS OF STAGE 1 / RISK ST AGE 1 RECOVERY HI GHE R GRADING 3 5 0 1 1 0 5 9 4 2 1 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 IM DAY 1 DAY2 DAY3 DAY4 DAY5 DAY6 DAY7 Figure-6: Incidence of AKI ON Post-op Day by AKIN/RIFLE RIFLE AKIN 1. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3365-7 0. 2. Bellomo R, Ron co C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Pale vsky P . Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup. Acute renal failure definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs:the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) .Crit Care. 2004;8:R204- 12. 3. Mehta RL, Ke llum JA, Shah SV , Molitoris BA, Ro nco C, War nock DG, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury.Crit Care. 2007;11:R31 No AKI 45 (62%) AKIN only 12 (17%) AKIN + RIFLE 12 (17%) RIFLE only 3 (4%) Figure-5: Comparison of AKIN & RIFLE We are grateful to the Col (Dr) S Singh, Gp Capt.(Dr) R M Sharma, Lt Col. (Dr) R Goyal and Department of Anaesthes iology and critical care, AFMC Pune for their kind guidence and support. 16 9 11 9 4 3 9 11 0 5 10 15 20 25 < 30 yrs 31-45 yrs 46-60 yrs > 60 yrs Figure-2: Distribution according to Age No AKI AKI  Criteria AKI Mean sd) Non AKI Mean sd) p- Value Pre-op Cr (mg/dl) 0.83 (±0.24) 0.96 (±0.20) 0.018 Pre- Op Urea (mg/dl) 29.11 (±10.25) 22.68 (±8.08) 0.795 Pre- Op K + (mmol)  4.267 (± 0.38) 4.193 (±0.43) 0.470 Intra-Op Urine output (ml) 1082.59 (±963) 956.89 (±418) 0.446 Intra-Op Blood loss (ml) 653.33 (±256) 529.33 (±190) 0.022 Duration of Surgery (hr) 5.74 (±1.14) 4.84 (±1.84) 0.013 APACHE score 8.33 (±3.96) 6.04 (±4.95) 0.045 Criteria ALL cases 72) AKI 27) Non AKI 45) p-Value Hypertension 16(22.2%) 8(29.6%) 8(17.8%) 0.258 Diabetes 15(20.8%) 10(37.0%) 5(11.1%) 0.015 Liver diseases 2(2.8%) 2(7.4%) 0(0%) 0.047 LVH/ CAD 3(4.2%) 3(11.1%) 0(0%) 0.049 Malignancy 12(16.7%) 4(14.8%) 8(17.8%) 1.000 Seizures 20(27.8%) 8(29.6%) 12(26.7%) 0.792 Immobilization 7(9.7%) 4(14.8%) 3(6.7%) 0.413 Chemotherapy 1(1.4%) 0(0%) 1(2.2%) 1.000 Contrast study 20(27.8%) 13(48.1%) 7(15.6%) 0.006 Transfusion Reaction 2(2.8%) 1(3.7%) 1(2.2%) 1.000 Hypo albuminemia 22(30.6%) 12(44.4%) 10(22.2%) 0.045 Conclusion Diagnosis of early AKI was found to be higher using the AKIN than RIFLE criteria Whether there is over-diagnosis by AKIN than RIFLE criteria cannot be interpreted in this study.  All data analyse d using SPSS Version 20.0 software Patient’s age > 60 yr are more prone to AKI (Figure-2) More patients were diagnosed as early AKI by AKIN (33.33%) than by RIFLE (20.83%) criteria (P<0.0001). (Figure3-5) The majority of patients had serum creatinine value increases of greater than 50% or greater than 0.3 mg/Dl from baseline within the first 48 hours postoperatively (Figure-6)  Association of Quantitative risk factor suc h as Pre-op Sr Creatinine, Intra-op blood loss, Duration of surgery and APACHE II score on ICU admission was found significant using un-paired test.  Association of Qualitative risk factor such as Contrast, Diabetes, Hypo albuminemia, CAD/LVH and Liver diseases was found significant. Diagnosis of early AKI was higher using  AKIN than RIFLE criteria. Outcome prediction (recovery/failure) was comparable in both. (Figure-7) Increased blood loss, increased operative time, higher APACHE II score at admission & hypoalbumenemia were found to be associated with early AKI. Limitations : Small sample size , single center study and no sub group analysis has been done. TAB LE 1: Peri-op risk factors TABLE 2: Risk factors

Transcript of AKI POSTER

Page 1: AKI POSTER

8/10/2019 AKI POSTER

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aki-poster 1/1

RIFLE

CLASS

RIFLE GFR Criteria UO Criteria AKIN GFR

CRITERIA

AKIN

CLASS

RISK Increase Cr × 1.5 Or

GFR decreases

>25%

UO < 0.5

ml/kg/hr

× 6 hr

Increase Cr × 

1.5 Or

≥ 0.3 mg/dl 

STAGE 1

INJURY Increase Cr ×  2 Or

GFR decreases

> 50%

UO < 0.5

ml/kg/hr

× 12 hr

Increase Cr × 

2

STAGE 2

FAILURE Increase Cr × 3 Or

GFR decreases

> 75% Or

Cr ≥ 4mg/dl ( with

acute rise of

≥ 0.5 mg/dl) 

UO < 0.3

ml/kg/hr

× 24 hr Or

 Anuria × 12

hr

Increase Cr × 

3 Or

Cr ≥ 4mg/dl (

with acute rise

of ≥ 0.5 mg/dl) 

STAGE 3

LOSS Complete loss of renal function for >

4 weeks

ESRD END STAGE RENAL DISEASES

Table-4 : RIFLE v/s AKIN differences 

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN POST-OP NEUROSURGERY PATIENTS IN

CU: A COMPARISON BETWEEN RIFLE AND AKIN CLASSIFICATION

Dr. Vidit Joshi1 Col(Dr) R Ramprasad2, Brig (Dr)G S Ramesh3 

1Resident Anesthesiology, AFMC Pune.2Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology AFMC Pune

3Professor & HOD, Department of Anaesthesiology AFMC Pune

To study the incidence of AKI in post op

eurosurgery patients in ICU using RIFLE

AKIN criteria

To note whether there are differences in

entification of Acute Kidney injury in post-

p Neurosurgery patients in ICU using

IFLE and AKIN criteria

To study, associated risk factors in the

evelopment of AKI

Objectives 

Acknowledgemen

References

Discussion

Introduction Observation 

Sr No.  Criteria  AKIN  RIFLE 

1  Sr Creatinine

changes 

Change

Within a 48-

hour 

Over a one-week

period from

Baseline 

3  Absolute S.Cr

increment in Stage 1 

Rise of ≥0.3

mg/dL in 48

hrs 

4  Renal replacement

therapy 

Stage 3  No severity class

assigned 

 Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly

seen in the perioperative period and in

the intensive care unit (ICU). It is

associated with a prolonged hospital stay,

high morbidity and mortality.1

To date, there is no universally accepted

definition for acute kidney dysfunction.

The criteria for AKI was first published

with acronym RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure,

Loss of kidney function, and End-stage

renal failure), to overcome different

definitions for AKI2

More recently, a modified version was

proposed by the Acute Kidney injuryNetwork (AKIN)3 

Neurosurgical patients are more prone to

kidney stress due to blood loss & major

fluid shift, water imbalance in peri-op

period and excessive use of diuretics. 

Materials &

Methods 

Results

Table-3 :RIFLE & AKIN criteria 

Study Design: Prospective observational

study

Study Place: ICU CH(SC), AFMC, Pune

Study Population: All adult Neurosurgical

patients with ICU admission post-op for >

24 hrs

Study Period: DEC 2012 - SEPT 2013

Sample Size: 72 patient

All patients assessed daily for 7 post-op

day using both the RIFLE and AKIN

criteria

MALE43 (60%)

FEMALE29 (40%)

Figure-1: Distribution according to Sex

Non AKI48 (67%)

Stage 119 (26%)

Stage 21 (1%) Stage 3

4 (6%)

Figure-3: Incidence of AKIby AKIN

No AKI57 (79%)

RISK10 (14%)

Injury3 (4%)

Failure2 (3%)

Figure-4: Incidence of AKIby RIFLE criteria

15

23

10

19

54

0

5

10

15

20

25

RIFLE AKIN

Figure-7: PROGRESS OF STAGE 1 / RISK

S TA GE 1 RE COV ER Y H IGH ER GR ADI NG

3

5

0

1 1

0

5

9

4

21

10

2

4

6

8

10

IM DAY 1 DAY2 DAY3 DAY4 DAY5 DAY6 DAY7

Figure-6: Incidence of AKI ON

Post-op Day by AKIN/RIFLE

RIFLE AKIN

1. Chertow GM, Burdick E, Honour M, Bonventre JV, Bates DW. A

kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalizedpatients.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3365-70.

2. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute

Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup. Acute renal failure—definitoutcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and informatio

technology needs:the Second International Consensus Conferen

the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) .Crit Care. 2004;8:R212.

3. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnoc

et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to impr

outcomes in acute kidney injury.Crit Care. 2007;11:R31

No AKI45 (62%)

AKINonly

12 (17%)

AKIN +RIFLE

12 (17%)

RIFLEonly

3 (4%)

Figure-5: Comparison ofAKIN & RIFLE

We are grateful to the Col (Dr) S Singh, Gp Capt.(Dr) R M Sh

Lt Col. (Dr) R Goyal and Department of Anaesthesiology and

critical care, AFMC Pune for their kind guidence and support.

16

911

9

4

3

911

0

5

10

15

20

25

< 30 yrs 31-45 yrs 46-60 yrs > 60 yrs

Figure-2: Distribution according to Age

No AKI AKI

 

Criteria AKI

Mean sd)

Non AKI

Mean sd)

p-

Value

Pre-op Cr (mg/dl)  0.83

(±0.24)

0.96

(±0.20)

0.018 

Pre- Op Urea

(mg/dl) 

29.11

(±10.25)

22.68

(±8.08)

0.795 

Pre- Op K+ (mmol)  4.267

(± 0.38)

4.193

(±0.43)

0.470 

Intra-Op Urine

output (ml) 

1082.59

(±963)

956.89

(±418)

0.446 

Intra-Op Blood loss

(ml) 

653.33

(±256)

529.33

(±190)

0.022 

Duration of Surgery(hr) 

5.74(±1.14)

4.84(±1.84)

0.013 

APACHE score  8.33

(±3.96)

6.04

(±4.95)

0.045 

Criteria

ALL

cases 72)

AKI 27)

Non

AKI 45)

p-Value

Hypertension 16(22.2%) 8(29.6%) 8(17.8%) 0.258

Diabetes 15(20.8%) 10(37.0%) 5(11.1%) 0.015

Liver diseases 2(2.8%) 2(7.4%) 0(0%) 0.047

LVH/ CAD 3(4.2%) 3(11.1%) 0(0%) 0.049

Malignancy 12(16.7%) 4(14.8%) 8(17.8%) 1.000

Seizures 20(27.8%) 8(29.6%) 12(26.7%) 0.792

Immobilization 7(9.7%) 4(14.8%) 3(6.7%) 0.413

Chemotherapy 1(1.4%) 0(0%) 1(2.2%) 1.000

Contrast study 20(27.8%) 13(48.1%) 7(15.6%) 0.006

Transfusion

Reaction

2(2.8%) 1(3.7%) 1(2.2%) 1.000

Hypo

albuminemia

22(30.6%) 12(44.4%) 10(22.2%) 0.045

Conclusion Diagnosis of early AKI was found to

higher using the AKIN than RIFLE criter

Whether there is over-diagnosis by A

than RIFLE criteria cannot be interprete

this study.

 All data analysed using SPSS Version

software

Patient’s age > 60 yr are more prone to

(Figure-2)

More patients were diagnosed as early

by AKIN (33.33%) than by RIFLE (20.8

criteria (P<0.0001). (Figure3-5)

The majority of patients had se

creatinine value increases of greater

50% or greater than 0.3 mg/Dl baseline within the first 48 h

postoperatively (Figure-6)

 Association of Quantitative risk factor s

as Pre-op Sr Creatinine, Intra-op b

loss, Duration of surgery and APACH

score on ICU admission was fo

significant using un-paired test.

 Association of Qualitative risk factor s

as Contrast, Diabetes, Hypo albumine

CAD/LVH and Liver diseases was fo

significant.

Diagnosis of early AKI was higher u

 AKIN than RIFLE criteria.

Outcome prediction (recovery/failure)

comparable in both. (Figure-7)

Increased blood loss, increased opera

time, higher APACHE II score

admission & hypoalbumenemia were fo

to be associated with early AKI.

Limitations : Small sample size , si

center study and no sub group analysis

been done.

TABLE 1: Peri-op risk factors TABLE 2: Risk factors