AHA Resuscitation Quality Improvement Overview
-
Upload
david-hiltz -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
450 -
download
7
Transcript of AHA Resuscitation Quality Improvement Overview
Cardiac Arrest Incidence & Outcomes
• Estimated 209,000 in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA) each year– (4 per 1000 admissions – Chen 2013, JAMA Intern Med. –
GWTG-R)
• Culture of hopelessness in outcomes from IHCA may stem from the lack of knowledge and uniform reporting standards
• Estimated IHCA Survival Rates– 19% Adult Survival (AHA 2020 Goal: 38%)– 35% Pediatric Survival (AHA 2020 Goal: 50%)
Variability in Survival from IHCA
• Significant variability in outcomes even after risk adjustment
• 2014 Study of 135,896 IHCA - GWTG-R (468 hospitals) – 8.3% - 31.4% unadjusted survival rates– 12.4% - 22.7% risk adjusted survival rates– The hospital of admission may influence survival by 42%– Differences in patient case-mix or hospital characteristics had
no impact on variation
Merchant 2014, J Am Heart Association
• Hospitals that performed better on publically reported outcomes (AMI, HF, Pneumonia) did not necessarily have better cardiac arrest survival
Chen 2013, 700 – GWTG-R
• High-quality CPR (HQCPR) is the primary component in influencing survival from cardiac arrest
– When rescuers compress at a depth of <38 mm, survival-to-discharge rates after out-of-hospital arrest are reduced by 30%
– When rescuers compress too slowly, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after IHCA falls from 72% to 42%
Stiell et al. 2012
Metrics of HQCPR to include compressions, ventilations, rates, and chest compression fraction are primary influencers in survival rates
Click Here to View AHA Consensus on CPR Quality
High-Quality CPR Saves Lives
• Psychomotor skills decline rapidly over time
• Current two-year course completion card model does not lend itself to the maintenance of competency
• RQI provides performance data for key resuscitation quality metrics
• RQI implements QI measures in training and clinical performance
“Poor-quality CPR should be considered a
preventable harm.
In healthcare environments, variability in clinician performance
has affected the ability to reduce healthcare-
associated complications….”
Meaney et al.Circulation. 2013;128:417-435.
CPR Psychomotor Skills Rapidly Decay
• There is significant misalignment in perception of providers’ proficiency for HQCPR and reality
• 75% of healthcare providers believe they perform quality CPR
• Only 26% self-report they are compliant to AHA Guidelines in their CPR performance
• Studies show CPR performance is often low
Lpsos Survey, 2009
Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of
American drivers rate themselves as "excellent" or "very
good" drivers2011 Financial Dynamicssurvey for Allstate Insurance
CPR Skills Misperceived
Biennial Training Does Not Sustain HQ CPR
AHA Guidelines Recommend More Frequent Training
• The RQI Program requires an active course completion card to enter
• RQI Program users then continuously reinforce skills through regular, self-directed assessments
• User engagement with RQI provides a perpetual renewal of credential
RQI Program
Entering the RQI Program
What is the RQI Program?
BLS for Healthcare Provider
Q2 Q4Q3 Q2 Q3Q1 Q4
Psychomotor Skills Sessions (Approx. 48min total)
Cognitive Content Modules (Approx. 57min total)
Q1
High Frequency & Low Dose
Year 1 Year 2Introduction to RQI (2)2-Rescuer Adult BLS (3)2-Rescuer Adult BLS Patient Case 1 (10)1-Rescuer Adult BLS (3)Adult/Child Choking (3)
2-Rescuer Adult BLS Patient Case 2 (10)1-Rescuer Child BLS (10)2-Rescuer Infant BLS (5)1-Rescuer Infant BLS (10)Infant Choking (3)
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Adult / Child1 – Rescuer
CPR
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
InfantCompressionsVentilations
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Infant1 – Rescuer
CPR
6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min
BLS for HCP and ACLS Combined
Psychomotor Skills Sessions (Approx. 48min total)
Cognitive Content Modules (Approx. 233min total)
High Frequency & Low Dose
Year 1 Year 2Self-Assessment module (15)Team Dynamics Lesson (10)BLS and ACLS Surveys (25)IO Insertion (2)Adult BLS (15)Adult/Child Choking (3)1-Rescuer Child BLS (10)2-Rescuer Infant BLS (10)1-Rescuer Infant BLS (5)Infant choking (3)
ACLS Tutorial and Patient Case (15)Acute Coronary Syndromes (25)Cardiac Arrest Patient Case (10)Stroke (23)Stroke Patient Case (10)Ventricular Tachycardia Patient Case (10)Bradycardia Patient Case (10)Respiratory Arrest Patient Case (10)Megacode Patient Case 1 (10)Megacode Patient Case 2 (10)
Q2 Q4Q3 Q2 Q3Q1 Q4Q1
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Adult / Child1 – Rescuer
CPR
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
InfantCompressionsVentilations
Adult / ChildCompressionsVentilations
Infant1 – Rescuer
CPR
6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min 6-8 min
Video tutorials, eHandbook, simulation, audio-visual feedback during skills assessment
Robust Interactive User Experience
You can only improve what you measure
Quality CPR Feedback
• RQI attests to the competence for single rescuers to demonstrate high-quality CPR skills
• Approved mock codes and team resuscitation training are encouraged to enhance the RQI program:– Can be used for quarterly RQI activity and completion requirement for
ongoing BLS and ACLS training
• Skill station(s) can be used to support mock codes for local simulation– Adult manikins can be placed on bed and connected wirelessly to tablet for
collection of performance data
• RQI learning events are intended to support the HQ resuscitation efforts to sustain optimal team dynamics
Mock Codes for Team Dynamics
• Students enter the program with an active course completion card
• Every quarter that is successfully completed automatically updates the expiration date of student’s course completion card by 90 days
Perpetual Course Completion
Virtual Course Completion Card (eCard)• Available from RQI eCard
website; provides eCard as shown at right that may be printed locally
Benefits• Simplifies card management• Eco-Friendly • Convenient authentication in
AHA eCard system• Providers have self-serve
access to card replacement• Can be printed by participants
and managed by administration for compliance purposes
AHA eCards
• Three pilot sites ran a rudimentary version of the program that began in 2012:– Ohio State University– University of Chicago– Kaiser Permanente San Diego
• Surveys of participants revealed a high level of satisfaction with program outcomes
RQI Pilot Success
• Independently conducted cost-benefit analysis resulted in significant savings over conventional life support training programs
• RQI positioned as a core institutional value with a goal to save more lives
• Over 2,500 participants with 99% compliance
“With 24/7 access to the mobile skills station, the
program supports
autonomous, self-directed
learning” – Texas Health Dallas
RQI Implementation Success
• The RQI Program offers significant overall institutional savings when compared to conventional BLS and ACLS programs
• Program activities in work areas provide less program administration and operational expense; price is based on number of participants
• Case studies using current eLearning methods demonstrate decreased BLS/ACLS program administration costs and savings by eliminating time off the floor
• The greatest value is improved patient safety and resuscitation outcomes
The Savings of the RQI Program
• The RQI Program is a service delivery platform; organizations do not purchase RQI like traditional products
• RQI is a subscription based on the number of students and carts within the program:– Ongoing simulation practice brought to work areas to
assimilate into normal work day – 24/7 access – Drive for quality, not course completion cards– Facilitation of self-directed CPR training so educators can
focus on high-quality events like mock codes and team building exercises
Key Features of Subscription
• Organizations who value quality in resuscitation improvement initiatives and who are looking for solutions to improve performance and patient outcomes are ideal for the RQI Program
• Characteristics common to ideal RQI sites:– Maintenance of competence strategies – Utilization of Simulation – High-quality CPR focus– Regular mock codes and team training– Resuscitation committees focused outcomes– High importance on tracking of IHCA outcomes
Is Your Organization Prepared to Improve Resuscitation Quality?
• High-quality CPR is the single most influential factor that has been shown to improve survival from cardiac arrest
• The RQI Program supports sustaining the skills to perform high-quality CPR for improved patient safety and outcomes
• The RQI Program’s low-dose, high-frequency education model with simulation brought to the work area offers increased efficiency and focuses on resuscitation quality
In Summary
Slide Appendix:
The remaining slides provide an overview of key research in support of the RQI program
Edelson et al. Resuscitation 2006
Clinical effects of compression depth and pre-shock pause
AHA Consensus Statement: CPR Quality
Return To Presentation
Optimized CCF can be sustained in clinical practice through maintenance of competency, focusing on performance skills and team training, mock codes, and clinical debriefings
Vaillancourt Resuscitation 2011
Chest Compression Fraction vs. ROSC in Non-VF/VT
Return To Presentation
Mean compression depth:Exp. Group > Control (p=0.03)
Performance over time:Exp. Group – no changeControl - ↓after 9 mos (p=0.004)
Oermann, M.H., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2011). Effects of monthly practice on nursing students¹ CPR psychomotor skill performance.Resuscitation, 82, 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.022.
2010 CPR Skills Study
Return To Presentation
Mean ventilation volume:Exp. Group > Control (p=0.001)
Performance over time:Exp. Group – continual ↑Control – < recommended for
all 12 months
Oermann, M.H., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2011). Effects of monthly practice on nursing students¹ CPR psychomotor skill performance.Resuscitation, 82, 447-453. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.022
2010 CPR Skills Study
Return To Presentation