Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA...

61
1 Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011

Transcript of Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA...

Page 1: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

1

Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module

Third Release SCA Census 2010

Oct, 2011

Page 2: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

2

Mission and Goals

In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee was formed by the Board of Directors to develop a census-level survey to help the SCA to move forward into the next decade; to identify, address and work on current issues; to gain a deeper understanding into what makes the SCA what it is today; and to delve into the reasons for joining, remaining in, and leaving the SCA.

The survey was fielded via the internet via Survey Monkey on August 1, 2010 and ran until December 1, 2010. Data coding, data cleaning, and identity security edits were performed on the 17,821 completed surveys in the 1st and 2nd Quarters of 2011.

The results of this survey will be made available in phases on the SCA 2010 Census website. The goal is quarterly releases. Our target in the next release (Winter 2011) is to offer deep dives into key topic areas such as the Same Gender Consort questions.

As we promised, the survey data will remain completely anonymous and will not be sold or shared beyond this survey's purpose. The questions we asked make it possible to identify individual respondents (for example, by looking at kingdom, awards, and offices held); therefore, we cannot keep that promise and make the raw data available. We will be releasing data summaries (this is the first of several planned summaries) as we continue analysis. We are working with experts in the field of data and identity security determine if we can find ways to make more of the data available without violating the promises we have made.

If you would like to learn more about the SCA 2010 Census, if you have questions or ideas about the project, please contact the committee at [email protected].

Page 3: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

3

Census 2010 Committee Members

Chair: Lisa Sawyer (Ysabeau of Prague) Vice Chair: Erik Langhans (Modius von Mergentheim)

Members: John Rudin, Ph.D. (Robin of Gilwell) Dave Majors (Dafydd Blaidd)Max Nelson (Max von Halstern)Julia Smith, Ph.D. (Juliana de Luna)Mark Waks (Justin du Coeur)Sarah Lash, Ph.D. (Sibyl Sevenoke)Lew Wolkoff (Eleazar ha-Levi)Kay Mead (Jutta van der Bruegghen)Rob Bolin (Adair MacDermid)Neil Perrie (Will of Okewaite)Daniel Fenwick (Daniel de Blare)Mildred Savidge (Jaquelinne Sauvageon)Ward Ballard (Bertrand d'Avignon)Wendy Erisman, Ph.D. (Gwenllian ferch Maredudd)Benjamin M. White (Connor MacGillivray) Josh Handel (Martin Malone)Kate Daniel (Maimuna al-Bukhariyya)Mike Squires (Alan Culross)

Board Ombudsman: Denise Hundley (Denise Duvalier)

Page 4: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

4

Table of Contents

pg

Awards level by category of award 5

Peerage for other martial (Yes-No) 6

How recognized by kingdom 22

How recognized by participation 30

How recognized by activity type 38

How recognized by level of award 46

How recognized by current peerage 54

Page 5: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

5

Q29. Which of the following awards have you received (understanding that not all kingdoms or local groups give all of these awards)? (Same question but with bases switched/reversed) (By type of award)

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=10320

A&S Service Armored Combat

Fencing Other Martial Other Non-Martial

59% 66% 60% 58% 51% 54%

15% 15% 16%11% 11%

15%42% 41% 44% 36%40%

47%54% 61% 48%

45%33%

23%28% 27%22%

31% 20% 9%18% 13% 27%1% 1% 2%

Peerage

GoA (grant) level award

AoA (armigerous) level award

Kingdom award (non-armiguous)

Principality award

Baronial (local) level award (armigerous or non-armigerous)

n=5363 n=8155 n=2214 n=980 n=1206 n=1981

Page 6: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

6

Q45. The SCA currently has peerages for excellence in armored combat (Chivalry), arts and sciences (Laurel), and service (Pelican), as well as for activities as royals (Rose, royal peerage).

Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?

Page 7: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

7

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By level of involvement)

Source: SCA Census 2010

Current participant Past participant Paid member Not paid member

71% 73% 71% 72%

17% 12% 18% 10%

13% 15% 11% 18% No Opinion

No

Yes

n=9674 n=2027 n=7990 n=1669

Page 8: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

8

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By kingdom)

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9643

Yes NoNo

OpinionÆthelmearc 100% 74% 14% 12%Ansteorra 100% 68% 20% 11%An Tir 100% 76% 12% 12%Artemisia 100% 68% 20% 12%Atenveldt 100% 69% 20% 11%Atlantia 100% 77% 13% 10%Caid 100% 68% 19% 13%Calontir 100% 67% 20% 13%Drachenwald 100% 70% 11% 19%Ealdormere 100% 70% 16% 14%East 100% 73% 14% 13%Gleann Abhann 100% 68% 20% 12%Lochac 100% 79% 10% 12%Meridies 100% 69% 19% 12%Middle 100% 70% 17% 12%Northshield 100% 69% 14% 16%Outlands 100% 69% 22% 10%Trimaris 100% 65% 24% 11%West 100% 63% 22% 15%

Page 9: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

9

SCA Inc. SCA New Zealand

SCA Australia SKA Sweden SKA Finland

70%88%

77%67% 63%

18%

5%11%

10%6%

11% 7% 12%23%

31%No Opinion

No

Yes

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=7967

n=7532 n=73 n=281 n=49

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By organization)

n=32

Page 10: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

10

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By selected demographics)

Source: SCA Census 2010

By Gender Yes NoNo

OpinionMale 69% 21% 11%Female 73% 12% 15%

By Age Yes NoNo

OpinionUnder 18 68% 9% 23%18-24 71% 11% 18%25-34 73% 12% 15%35-44 71% 19% 11%45-54 72% 16% 12%55 or older 69% 16% 15%

By HH Income Yes NoNo

OpinionUnder $30,000 76% 10% 14%$30,000-$59,999 73% 15% 12%$60,000-89,999 69% 20% 11%$90,000 or more 67% 23% 10%

Page 11: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

11

0-4 years 5-10 years 11-16 years 17-22 years 23 or more years

75% 75% 71% 68% 67%

7% 12% 19% 22% 22%

18% 13% 10% 10% 11% No Opinion

No

Yes

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=4814

n=999 n=1097 n=1000 n=853

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By time in the SCA)

n=865

Page 12: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

12

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By selected activities)

Source: SCA Census 2010

In which SCA activities do you currently participate Yes NoNo

Opinion n=Armored combat / Heavy / Hard suit fighting 61% 30% 10% 2620Fencing / Rapier / Light fighting 80% 14% 6% 2058Target archery 78% 13% 9% 3149Combat archery 75% 18% 6% 779Equestrian activities 70% 24% 6% 453Thrown weapons / Siege weapons, etc. 77% 14% 8% 1393

Which one primary SCA activity do you participate in most often or most seriously? Yes No

No Opinion n=

Armored combat / Heavy / Hard suit fighting 52% 36% 11% 1311Fencing / Rapier / Light fighting 87% 7% 6% 957Target archery 85% 6% 9% 642Combat archery 86% 8% 7% 65Equestrian activities 79% 15% 6% 112Thrown weapons / Siege weapons, etc 85% 5% 10% 102

Which one primary SCA activity do you participate in most often or most seriously? (Grouped by Type) Yes No

No Opinion n=

Martial 68% 23% 9% 3189Service 72% 17% 11% 1600A&S 73% 13% 14% 4142

Page 13: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

13

None Local Regional Kingdom Society

72% 74% 67% 65% 67%

8%16% 23% 28% 25%

20%10% 10% 7% 8%

No Opinion

No

Yes

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=8695

n=1924 n=4397 n=775 n=1458

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By office held)

n=141

Page 14: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

14

None Territorial or Palatine Baron / Baroness

Prince / Princess King / Queen

73%59%

49% 45%

14%32%

43% 47%

13% 8% 8% 9%No Opinion

No

Yes

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=7693

n=7020 n=527 n=217

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By special position held)

n=213

Page 15: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

15

less than 3 events

3-4 events 5-6 events 7-12 events More than 12 events

72% 74% 74% 70%60%

10% 12% 15% 21%32%

18% 14% 11% 9% 8%No Opinion

No

Yes

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9477

n=2159 n=2227 n=1784 n=2231

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By # of events per yr)

n=1076

Page 16: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

16

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By selected award types)

Source: SCA Census 2010

What is the highest level of award you have received in the SCA? Yes NoNo

Opinion n=I have not received an award in the SCA 75% 5% 20% 2165An award without an Award of Arms (AoA) attached (non-armigerous) 79% 9% 12% 553An Award of Arms or, AoA level award (including orders of high merit) 75% 13% 11% 3990Grant of Arms (grant) or grant level award 73% 18% 9% 1286Court Barony 62% 26% 12% 353Peerage (Chivalry, Pelican, Laurel) 58% 35% 7% 967Royal peerage (Viscount/ess, Count/ess, Duke/Duchess) 42% 51% 6% 237

Which of the following awards have you received? (At any level) Yes NoNo

Opinion n=A&S 67% 23% 10% 3490Service 69% 21% 10% 5470Armored Combat 53% 40% 7% 1139Fencing 79% 16% 5% 751Other Martial 73% 21% 6% 858Other Non-Martial 66% 27% 6% 1269Unspecified 68% 21% 11% 1914

Page 17: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

17

Chivalry Laurel Pelican Royal Peerage

36%

63% 56%42%

59%

30% 36%51%

4% 7% 7% 6%No Opinion

No

Yes

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=1194

n=206 n=581 n=589

Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By peerage type)

n=237

Page 18: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

18

11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ to peerage recognition in Q45.They were then asked…

Page 19: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

19

Q46. Peerage by martial activity by type of award.

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=11701 (“Yes” to Q45.)

Rapier Combat / Target

archery

Target archery alone

Combat archery alone

Equestrian Thrown weapons

Siege weapons

1%12% 16% 18%

10%21% 19%

4%

4%11% 3% 13%

7% 11%37%25%

15% 31% 22%20%

23%0% 0% 1%

1%1% 1%

1%35%

18% 16%10% 29%

13%13%

20%

36% 38%34%

22%36% 30%

3% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

n=10984 n=10088 n=9586 n=9359 n=10250 n=10060n=10111

Page 20: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

20

1381168 1487 1671 1020

2106 1953408

4351096 283 1339

675 10644087 25511463 2859 2255 2014

233324

45 7451 77 58

67

3857

1800 1514974

29241269

1307

2194

35853607 3212

22553635 2974

276

504345 309

380 354 362

Rapier Combat / Target archery

Target archery alone

Combat archery alone

Equestrian Thrown weapons

Siege weapons

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=11701 (“Yes” to Q45.)

n=10984 n=10088 n=9586 n=9359 n=10250 n=10060n=10111

Q46. Peerage by martial activity by type of award. (Show in respondents) (Same data shown in different chart type)

Page 21: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

21

Q46. Peerage by martial activity by type of award. (Show in respondents) (Same data shown in different chart type) (With “Other” and “Pelican” responses removed)

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=11701 (“Yes” to Q45.)

138

1168 14

87 1671

1020

2106

1953

408

435

1096

283

1339

675

1064

4087

2551

1463

2859

2255

2014 23

33

3857

1800

1514

974

2924

1269

1307

2194

3585

3607

3212

2255

3635

2974

Rapier Combat / Target archery

Target archery alone

Combat archery alone

Equestrian Thrown weapons Siege weapons

Don't recognize Within Laurel Within Chivalry Within own Within shared

n=10984 n=10088 n=9586 n=9359 n=10250 n=10060n=10111

Page 22: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

22

11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?

These were then asked…

Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?

By Kingdom

Page 23: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

23

1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1%1% 3% 4%10%

4% 4% 2%

9%

5% 1% 3%5% 4% 3% 3%

5% 4% 8%4%

36% 30%36%

30%

29%

37% 44%

35%

38%

29%

38%38% 38% 42%

37% 34% 35%35%

37%

0%0%

0% 0%

1%

0%

0% 0%0%

0%

0%0% 0%

0%

0% 0% 0%0%

0%

37% 46%

40%35%

43%

40% 30% 28% 32%

33%

33%35% 33%

33%37% 40% 38% 29% 31%

22% 17% 16% 24% 23%14%

19% 21% 22%

34%22%

19% 21% 19% 19% 17% 19%25% 23%

2% 3% 2% 0% 1% 3% 3% 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By kingdom)

Page 24: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

24

13%17%

9% 11% 14% 14% 12% 9% 9% 10% 11%17%

7%13% 14% 14% 15% 12% 13%

2%

4%

4%

10% 4% 4%4% 8%

4% 3% 4%

5%

3%

3%5% 4% 5%

7% 5%

25%21%

23%

22%20% 23%

33%26%

31%

19%23%

23%

28%25%

23% 24%24% 26%

24%

1%0%

0%

0%1%

0%

0%

0% 1%

0%

1%

0%

0%1% 0% 0%

1% 0%0%

14%19%

27% 14% 21% 18%

14%19%

9%

14%

18%

20%

23% 16% 16% 15%18%

14% 17%

39%33% 32% 39%

36% 36% 31% 34%

40% 48%36%

32%36%

37% 37% 37%32%

36% 35%

6% 5% 4% 4% 3% 5% 6% 4%8% 5% 7%

3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% 6%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)

Page 25: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

25Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)

9%

26%17% 14% 16% 19% 16%

8%13%

8% 10%

22% 23%16% 15% 13%

17% 19% 20%9%

10%

10% 17% 10%8% 16%

17%15%

7%9%

15% 13%

12% 11% 14%13%

15% 15%15%

12%

14%12%

12%14%

19%

15%18%

14%

17%

10% 15%

15%14% 15%

13%

16% 15%

1%

1%

1% 0%1%

1%

1%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%1%

1%1% 0%

1%

0% 0%

18%

13%19% 17%

20% 15%

14%

17%12%

17%

20%

17% 8%

14% 16% 16%19% 10%

14%

43%

33% 36% 38% 39% 38%29%

37% 39%

51%41%

33%35% 39% 39% 40%

34%35%

32%

4% 4% 3% 2% 2% 4% 4% 5% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 4%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 26: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

26Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)

15%24%

18% 16%21% 19% 17%

22%14%

19%14%

26%17% 15%

20% 18%24%

15%23%

2%

3%

3% 8% 1% 3%3%

5%

3%2%

3%

3%

2%1%

3%4%

3%

7%

3%

32%

24%

27%31%

29% 27%

41% 29%

35% 24% 32%

27%

32% 36%27% 28%

31%34% 27%

1%0%

0%

0%1%

0%

1%

1%1%

0%

1%

0%0%

1%0% 0%

1%1%

0%11%12%

14%

11%10%

10%

8%

8%

7%

8%

10%

12%

8%11%

9% 11%

8%8% 11%

36% 31% 35%33% 36% 36%

26%31%

38%45%

35%30%

38%33%

35% 36%30% 31% 30%

3% 5% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 27: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

27Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)

8%15%

9% 11% 13% 14%8%

4%13% 16%

8%14%

9% 10% 9% 8%14%

7% 7%

12%

12%

11%

20% 14% 11%16%

20%

11% 9%

11%

18%

12% 10% 12% 15%

14%

16% 16%

22%

21%

19%

16%17% 23% 26%

21%26%

17%21%

17%32%

27% 22% 21%

21%22% 19%

0%

1%

1%

1%1%

1%1%

0%

1%

1%1%

0%0%

1%1% 0%

0%0%

1%

29%

28%38% 22% 29%

29% 25%32% 16%

22% 29%

29%24%

26%28% 30%

27%27%

27%

26%19% 19% 27%

23% 19%20% 19%

27% 32%26%

19% 17% 24% 24% 23% 21% 24%25%

3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 28: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

28Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)

12%

28%23% 22%

27% 27%22% 18% 18% 15% 17%

24% 27%

17% 18% 16%

31%22% 25%

6%

7%

6% 11%6% 6%

9%11%

8%

4%6%

7% 4%

9% 8% 8%

5%

7%7%19%

16%20% 14% 17% 16%

25%18% 25%

16%

18%

14%

30%

17% 19% 20%

19%

20%20%

1%

0%0% 0%

2%0%

1%

0%0%

1%

1%1%

0%

1%1% 0%

0%

0%0%

17%

13% 14%13%

13%13%

10%

11% 6%

14%

17%17%

4%

14% 13% 14%

8%

9%10%

42%32% 34% 39% 33% 35% 31%

36% 39%50%

38%35% 32%

39% 38% 39%34%

39% 33%

3% 4% 3% 0% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 29: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

29Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105

Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)

17%26% 24%

18% 20%24%

20% 23%17%

21%16%

26%17% 18% 18% 16%

24%17% 20%

9%

9% 11%17% 9%

7% 13%16%

13%9%

8%

9%

12% 8% 8% 14%

14%

9%

13%

23%

20% 20% 18%21% 21%

29% 20%

25%17%

25%

20% 30%

24% 24%21%

24%

25%19%

1%

0% 0% 0% 1% 0%

1%0%

0%

0%1%

1%0%

1% 1% 0%

0%

1% 1%14%

12% 15%12% 15% 13%

10%11%

7%14%

15%

15% 6%15% 12% 14%

7%

14% 9%

33% 29% 27% 34% 29% 30%24%

27%34% 38% 31%

28%30% 31%

33% 31%27%

32%31%

3% 4% 4% 1% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 1% 4% 2% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3%7%

Æthelm

earc

Ansteorra

An Tir

Artem

isia

Atenveldt

Atlantia

Caid

Calontir

Drachenw

ald

Ealdorm

ere

East

Gleann

Abhann

Lochac

Meridies

Middle

Northshield

Outlands

Trimaris

West

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 30: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

30

11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?

These were then asked…

Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?

By Participation

Page 31: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

31

1% 2% 1% 2% 2%4% 3% 4% 2% 3%

36%42%

36% 39% 37%

0%

0%

0%0% 0%

36%30%

37% 33% 35%

20% 20% 20% 20% 20%

3% 3% 2% 3% 3%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By participation)

Page 32: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

32Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By participation)

12% 8%13% 10% 11%

4%4%

5%3% 4%

24% 31% 24%27% 25%

0% 1% 0% 0% 0%

18% 16% 18% 21% 21%

35% 36% 36%34% 34%

5% 4% 5% 5% 5%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 33: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

33Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By participation)

16% 14% 17% 13% 14%

12%10%

12%10% 11%

14% 19% 14%16% 15%

1% 1% 1%1% 1%

16% 14% 16% 18% 18%

37% 39% 37% 37% 37%

4% 3% 4% 5% 4%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 34: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

34Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By participation)

19%14%

20%14% 16%

3%3%

3%

2% 2%

30%34%

30%

31% 30%

1% 1%0%

1% 1%

10% 10% 10%13% 13%

34% 36% 34% 34% 35%

3% 3% 3% 4% 4%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 35: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

35Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By participation)

10% 10% 10% 9% 10%

13% 14% 13%11% 12%

22% 23% 21%23% 22%

1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

29% 27% 28% 31% 31%

22% 21% 23% 20% 20%

4% 4% 3% 4% 4%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 36: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

36Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By participation)

21% 19% 22% 18% 21%

7%5%

7%5%

5%

19% 24% 18%21% 19%

1% 1% 0%1% 1%

13% 12% 12% 16% 15%

36% 35% 36% 35% 36%

3% 4% 3% 4% 4%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 37: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

37Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By participation)

20% 16%21%

16% 18%

10%11%

11%

9%9%

23% 26%22%

24% 22%

1% 1% 1%1% 0%

13% 14% 12%17% 15%

30% 28% 30% 29% 30%

4% 4% 3% 4% 4%

Current

participant

Past participant

Current

participantpaid m

ember

Current

participant not paid m

ember

Current

participant past paid m

ember

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 38: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

38

11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?

These were then asked…

Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?

By Activity

Page 39: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

39

2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2%7%

4% 3% 5% 6% 4%

32%33% 36% 31% 33% 35%

0%0%

0%0%

0% 0%

39% 41% 36% 37% 30% 36%

17% 18% 21% 22% 27%21%

3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By activity)

Page 40: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

40Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By activity)

20%15% 12% 14% 14% 12%

7%

6%4%

5% 5% 5%

19%

21%24%

22% 22% 23%

0%1% 1% 0% 1% 1%

18%18% 19% 20%

13% 17%

30%35% 36%

33%41% 36%

6% 6% 6% 6% 4% 6%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 41: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

41Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By activity)

22% 18%11% 14%

19%13%

17%14%

11%16%

15%

12%

10%11%

14%

11%12%

12%

1%1%

1%1%

1%

1%

15%15%

23%19%

12%20%

31%36% 37% 34% 38% 37%

4% 5% 3% 5% 3% 4%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 42: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

42Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By activity)

29%22%

16% 20% 23%17%

4%

3%

2%3%

3%4%

26%

28%32%

31% 27%30%

1%

1%1%

0% 1% 1%

9%10% 13%

12%8% 12%

28%33% 33% 29% 35% 32%

4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 43: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

43Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By activity)

14% 11% 9% 10%4%

11%

17%14%

12% 13%

11%

12%

18%21%

21% 18%24%

20%

1%1%

1% 0% 1%1%

27%26%

31% 30% 31%30%

19% 22% 23% 24% 27% 23%

4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 4%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 44: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

44Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By activity)

32%25%

19%24% 27%

17%

10%

8%

7%8% 6%

8%

14%

15%

17%15% 17%

15%

1%

1%

1%0%

1%

1%

11%12%

15%14% 9%

18%

29%34% 38%

34% 37% 38%

4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 45: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

45Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By activity)

29%23% 19% 21%

25%18%

14%

12%10% 11%

13%

10%

18%

21%23% 21%

18%

21%

1%

1%1% 1%

1%

1%

11%12%

14% 14% 9%16%

23%28% 30% 29% 30% 31%

4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3%

Armored

Rapier

Target archery

Com

bat archery

Equstrian

Thrown-

SiegeOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 46: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

46

11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?

These were then asked…

Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?

By type of highest level of award

Page 47: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

47

1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4%2% 3% 3% 4% 5% 7%

16%

43%36% 37% 31%

32% 32%18%

0%

1% 0%0%

0% 0% 0%

32%38% 39%

40%42%

28% 31%

19% 20% 18% 21%17%

27% 26%

2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 5% 4%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By type of highest level of award )

Page 48: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

48Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)

8% 9% 12% 13% 17% 19%27%

3% 4%4% 5%

8% 6%

14%

29% 26%24% 21%

19% 22%

9%

0% 1% 0% 0%

0%0%

1%21% 22% 19%18%

19% 9%10%

35% 35%36% 38%

31%36% 33%

4% 3% 5% 6% 6% 8% 5%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

Peerage

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 49: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

49Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)

11% 11%16% 18% 19%

25% 28%9% 10%11%

13% 14%

17%

26%

17% 17%14%

11%11%

14%

7%

1% 1%1% 1%

0%

1%2%

19%20% 18% 14%

16%

6%4%

40%39% 38% 39% 35% 31% 30%

3% 2% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

Peerage

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 50: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

50Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)

11% 12%19%

23% 23%30%

43%

3% 3%

3%3% 5%

4%

11%

32%34%

30%27% 27%

27%

13%

1%1%

0%0% 0%

0%

2%

14%13% 11% 8% 9%

4%

1%

37%35% 34% 35% 32% 29% 27%

3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

Peerage

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 51: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

51Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)

6% 9% 10% 12% 13% 12% 13%10%

9%12%

14%17% 20%

28%25% 22%22%

19%17%

20%11%

1% 2%0% 0% 0%

0% 1%

35% 33% 31% 26% 25% 14% 16%

20% 23% 21% 25% 23% 27% 25%

3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 6%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

Peerage

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 52: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

52Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)

14% 16% 20%25% 28% 32%

42%5%

6%7%

8%8%

9%

14%

24%22%

19%14%

15%17%

7%

1% 1% 0% 0%0%

0%

2%

18% 16% 13% 9%

12% 3%

3%

35% 37%37% 40%

33% 33%28%

3% 1% 3% 3% 4% 6% 3%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

Peerage

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 53: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

53Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)

13% 17% 20%26% 24% 27%

38%6%

8%10%

13% 15%16%

22%

26%26%

24%

18% 19%19%

8%

1%

1%0%

0% 0%0%

2%

20%17% 13% 8%

11% 3%

2%

30%29% 30% 32%

27%30% 25%

4% 2% 3% 3% 4% 6% 4%

None

Award

without AoA

AoA level

Grant

level

Court

Barony

Peerage (C

hiv, Pel, Lau)

Royal

Peerage

Other

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 54: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

54

11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?

These were then asked…

Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?

By type of peerage currently held

Page 55: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

55

5%1% 1% 4%

23%

8% 7%

16%

14%

32% 30%

18%

0% 0%0% 0%

29%27%

27%31%

24% 27% 29%26%

5% 4% 6% 4%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By type of peerage currently held)

Page 56: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

56Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)

38%

15%21%

27%

18%

7%5%

14%

7%

22%20%

9%

2%

0% 1%1%

6%

9% 10%10%

23%

38% 36%

33%

7% 8% 8% 5%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 57: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

57Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)

31%21%

27% 28%

37%

17%15%

26%

2%

15%13%

7%

2%

0%1%

2%

6%

6%7%

4%

16%

36% 30%30%

5% 6% 7% 5%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 58: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

58Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)

51%

28% 31%

43%

11%

5% 4%

11%

13%

27% 24%

13%

2%

0% 1%

2%

3%

2% 5%

1%

16%

32% 30%

27%

4% 5% 7% 4%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 59: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

59Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)

15%9% 12% 13%

39%

20% 19%28%

6%

21% 17%

11%

1%

1%1%

1%

12%

13%15%

16%

19%28% 29%

25%

7% 7% 7% 6%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 60: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

60Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)

51%

27%33%

42%

19%

8%

9%

14%

2%

19%

15%

7%

2%

0%1%

2%

3%

2%3%

3%

18%

37%31%

28%

5% 6% 7% 3%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize

Page 61: Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA Census 2010 Oct, 2011. 2 Mission and Goals. In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee

61Source: SCA Census 2010

Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized? (By type of peerage currently held)

43%

22%28%

38%

28%

17%15%

22%

5%

19%17%

8%

2%

0% 0%

2%

2%

3% 3%

2%

16%

33% 30%

25%

4% 6% 7% 4%

Knight

Laurel

Pelican

Royal

PeerageOther

Within shared

Within own

Within Pelican

Within Chivalry

Within Laurel

Don't recognize