Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA...
Transcript of Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module Third ... · Presentation Module Third Release SCA...
1
Additional Peerage Options Presentation Module
Third Release SCA Census 2010
Oct, 2011
2
Mission and Goals
In July 2009, the SCA Census 2010 Committee was formed by the Board of Directors to develop a census-level survey to help the SCA to move forward into the next decade; to identify, address and work on current issues; to gain a deeper understanding into what makes the SCA what it is today; and to delve into the reasons for joining, remaining in, and leaving the SCA.
The survey was fielded via the internet via Survey Monkey on August 1, 2010 and ran until December 1, 2010. Data coding, data cleaning, and identity security edits were performed on the 17,821 completed surveys in the 1st and 2nd Quarters of 2011.
The results of this survey will be made available in phases on the SCA 2010 Census website. The goal is quarterly releases. Our target in the next release (Winter 2011) is to offer deep dives into key topic areas such as the Same Gender Consort questions.
As we promised, the survey data will remain completely anonymous and will not be sold or shared beyond this survey's purpose. The questions we asked make it possible to identify individual respondents (for example, by looking at kingdom, awards, and offices held); therefore, we cannot keep that promise and make the raw data available. We will be releasing data summaries (this is the first of several planned summaries) as we continue analysis. We are working with experts in the field of data and identity security determine if we can find ways to make more of the data available without violating the promises we have made.
If you would like to learn more about the SCA 2010 Census, if you have questions or ideas about the project, please contact the committee at [email protected].
3
Census 2010 Committee Members
Chair: Lisa Sawyer (Ysabeau of Prague) Vice Chair: Erik Langhans (Modius von Mergentheim)
Members: John Rudin, Ph.D. (Robin of Gilwell) Dave Majors (Dafydd Blaidd)Max Nelson (Max von Halstern)Julia Smith, Ph.D. (Juliana de Luna)Mark Waks (Justin du Coeur)Sarah Lash, Ph.D. (Sibyl Sevenoke)Lew Wolkoff (Eleazar ha-Levi)Kay Mead (Jutta van der Bruegghen)Rob Bolin (Adair MacDermid)Neil Perrie (Will of Okewaite)Daniel Fenwick (Daniel de Blare)Mildred Savidge (Jaquelinne Sauvageon)Ward Ballard (Bertrand d'Avignon)Wendy Erisman, Ph.D. (Gwenllian ferch Maredudd)Benjamin M. White (Connor MacGillivray) Josh Handel (Martin Malone)Kate Daniel (Maimuna al-Bukhariyya)Mike Squires (Alan Culross)
Board Ombudsman: Denise Hundley (Denise Duvalier)
4
Table of Contents
pg
Awards level by category of award 5
Peerage for other martial (Yes-No) 6
How recognized by kingdom 22
How recognized by participation 30
How recognized by activity type 38
How recognized by level of award 46
How recognized by current peerage 54
5
Q29. Which of the following awards have you received (understanding that not all kingdoms or local groups give all of these awards)? (Same question but with bases switched/reversed) (By type of award)
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=10320
A&S Service Armored Combat
Fencing Other Martial Other Non-Martial
59% 66% 60% 58% 51% 54%
15% 15% 16%11% 11%
15%42% 41% 44% 36%40%
47%54% 61% 48%
45%33%
23%28% 27%22%
31% 20% 9%18% 13% 27%1% 1% 2%
Peerage
GoA (grant) level award
AoA (armigerous) level award
Kingdom award (non-armiguous)
Principality award
Baronial (local) level award (armigerous or non-armigerous)
n=5363 n=8155 n=2214 n=980 n=1206 n=1981
6
Q45. The SCA currently has peerages for excellence in armored combat (Chivalry), arts and sciences (Laurel), and service (Pelican), as well as for activities as royals (Rose, royal peerage).
Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?
7
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By level of involvement)
Source: SCA Census 2010
Current participant Past participant Paid member Not paid member
71% 73% 71% 72%
17% 12% 18% 10%
13% 15% 11% 18% No Opinion
No
Yes
n=9674 n=2027 n=7990 n=1669
8
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By kingdom)
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9643
Yes NoNo
OpinionÆthelmearc 100% 74% 14% 12%Ansteorra 100% 68% 20% 11%An Tir 100% 76% 12% 12%Artemisia 100% 68% 20% 12%Atenveldt 100% 69% 20% 11%Atlantia 100% 77% 13% 10%Caid 100% 68% 19% 13%Calontir 100% 67% 20% 13%Drachenwald 100% 70% 11% 19%Ealdormere 100% 70% 16% 14%East 100% 73% 14% 13%Gleann Abhann 100% 68% 20% 12%Lochac 100% 79% 10% 12%Meridies 100% 69% 19% 12%Middle 100% 70% 17% 12%Northshield 100% 69% 14% 16%Outlands 100% 69% 22% 10%Trimaris 100% 65% 24% 11%West 100% 63% 22% 15%
9
SCA Inc. SCA New Zealand
SCA Australia SKA Sweden SKA Finland
70%88%
77%67% 63%
18%
5%11%
10%6%
11% 7% 12%23%
31%No Opinion
No
Yes
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=7967
n=7532 n=73 n=281 n=49
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By organization)
n=32
10
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By selected demographics)
Source: SCA Census 2010
By Gender Yes NoNo
OpinionMale 69% 21% 11%Female 73% 12% 15%
By Age Yes NoNo
OpinionUnder 18 68% 9% 23%18-24 71% 11% 18%25-34 73% 12% 15%35-44 71% 19% 11%45-54 72% 16% 12%55 or older 69% 16% 15%
By HH Income Yes NoNo
OpinionUnder $30,000 76% 10% 14%$30,000-$59,999 73% 15% 12%$60,000-89,999 69% 20% 11%$90,000 or more 67% 23% 10%
11
0-4 years 5-10 years 11-16 years 17-22 years 23 or more years
75% 75% 71% 68% 67%
7% 12% 19% 22% 22%
18% 13% 10% 10% 11% No Opinion
No
Yes
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=4814
n=999 n=1097 n=1000 n=853
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By time in the SCA)
n=865
12
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By selected activities)
Source: SCA Census 2010
In which SCA activities do you currently participate Yes NoNo
Opinion n=Armored combat / Heavy / Hard suit fighting 61% 30% 10% 2620Fencing / Rapier / Light fighting 80% 14% 6% 2058Target archery 78% 13% 9% 3149Combat archery 75% 18% 6% 779Equestrian activities 70% 24% 6% 453Thrown weapons / Siege weapons, etc. 77% 14% 8% 1393
Which one primary SCA activity do you participate in most often or most seriously? Yes No
No Opinion n=
Armored combat / Heavy / Hard suit fighting 52% 36% 11% 1311Fencing / Rapier / Light fighting 87% 7% 6% 957Target archery 85% 6% 9% 642Combat archery 86% 8% 7% 65Equestrian activities 79% 15% 6% 112Thrown weapons / Siege weapons, etc 85% 5% 10% 102
Which one primary SCA activity do you participate in most often or most seriously? (Grouped by Type) Yes No
No Opinion n=
Martial 68% 23% 9% 3189Service 72% 17% 11% 1600A&S 73% 13% 14% 4142
13
None Local Regional Kingdom Society
72% 74% 67% 65% 67%
8%16% 23% 28% 25%
20%10% 10% 7% 8%
No Opinion
No
Yes
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=8695
n=1924 n=4397 n=775 n=1458
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By office held)
n=141
14
None Territorial or Palatine Baron / Baroness
Prince / Princess King / Queen
73%59%
49% 45%
14%32%
43% 47%
13% 8% 8% 9%No Opinion
No
Yes
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=7693
n=7020 n=527 n=217
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By special position held)
n=213
15
less than 3 events
3-4 events 5-6 events 7-12 events More than 12 events
72% 74% 74% 70%60%
10% 12% 15% 21%32%
18% 14% 11% 9% 8%No Opinion
No
Yes
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9477
n=2159 n=2227 n=1784 n=2231
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By # of events per yr)
n=1076
16
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By selected award types)
Source: SCA Census 2010
What is the highest level of award you have received in the SCA? Yes NoNo
Opinion n=I have not received an award in the SCA 75% 5% 20% 2165An award without an Award of Arms (AoA) attached (non-armigerous) 79% 9% 12% 553An Award of Arms or, AoA level award (including orders of high merit) 75% 13% 11% 3990Grant of Arms (grant) or grant level award 73% 18% 9% 1286Court Barony 62% 26% 12% 353Peerage (Chivalry, Pelican, Laurel) 58% 35% 7% 967Royal peerage (Viscount/ess, Count/ess, Duke/Duchess) 42% 51% 6% 237
Which of the following awards have you received? (At any level) Yes NoNo
Opinion n=A&S 67% 23% 10% 3490Service 69% 21% 10% 5470Armored Combat 53% 40% 7% 1139Fencing 79% 16% 5% 751Other Martial 73% 21% 6% 858Other Non-Martial 66% 27% 6% 1269Unspecified 68% 21% 11% 1914
17
Chivalry Laurel Pelican Royal Peerage
36%
63% 56%42%
59%
30% 36%51%
4% 7% 7% 6%No Opinion
No
Yes
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=1194
n=206 n=581 n=589
Q45. …Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)? (By peerage type)
n=237
18
11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ to peerage recognition in Q45.They were then asked…
19
Q46. Peerage by martial activity by type of award.
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=11701 (“Yes” to Q45.)
Rapier Combat / Target
archery
Target archery alone
Combat archery alone
Equestrian Thrown weapons
Siege weapons
1%12% 16% 18%
10%21% 19%
4%
4%11% 3% 13%
7% 11%37%25%
15% 31% 22%20%
23%0% 0% 1%
1%1% 1%
1%35%
18% 16%10% 29%
13%13%
20%
36% 38%34%
22%36% 30%
3% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4%Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
n=10984 n=10088 n=9586 n=9359 n=10250 n=10060n=10111
20
1381168 1487 1671 1020
2106 1953408
4351096 283 1339
675 10644087 25511463 2859 2255 2014
233324
45 7451 77 58
67
3857
1800 1514974
29241269
1307
2194
35853607 3212
22553635 2974
276
504345 309
380 354 362
Rapier Combat / Target archery
Target archery alone
Combat archery alone
Equestrian Thrown weapons
Siege weapons
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=11701 (“Yes” to Q45.)
n=10984 n=10088 n=9586 n=9359 n=10250 n=10060n=10111
Q46. Peerage by martial activity by type of award. (Show in respondents) (Same data shown in different chart type)
21
Q46. Peerage by martial activity by type of award. (Show in respondents) (Same data shown in different chart type) (With “Other” and “Pelican” responses removed)
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=11701 (“Yes” to Q45.)
138
1168 14
87 1671
1020
2106
1953
408
435
1096
283
1339
675
1064
4087
2551
1463
2859
2255
2014 23
33
3857
1800
1514
974
2924
1269
1307
2194
3585
3607
3212
2255
3635
2974
Rapier Combat / Target archery
Target archery alone
Combat archery alone
Equestrian Thrown weapons Siege weapons
Don't recognize Within Laurel Within Chivalry Within own Within shared
n=10984 n=10088 n=9586 n=9359 n=10250 n=10060n=10111
22
11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?
These were then asked…
Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?
By Kingdom
23
1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1%1% 3% 4%10%
4% 4% 2%
9%
5% 1% 3%5% 4% 3% 3%
5% 4% 8%4%
36% 30%36%
30%
29%
37% 44%
35%
38%
29%
38%38% 38% 42%
37% 34% 35%35%
37%
0%0%
0% 0%
1%
0%
0% 0%0%
0%
0%0% 0%
0%
0% 0% 0%0%
0%
37% 46%
40%35%
43%
40% 30% 28% 32%
33%
33%35% 33%
33%37% 40% 38% 29% 31%
22% 17% 16% 24% 23%14%
19% 21% 22%
34%22%
19% 21% 19% 19% 17% 19%25% 23%
2% 3% 2% 0% 1% 3% 3% 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% 4%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By kingdom)
24
13%17%
9% 11% 14% 14% 12% 9% 9% 10% 11%17%
7%13% 14% 14% 15% 12% 13%
2%
4%
4%
10% 4% 4%4% 8%
4% 3% 4%
5%
3%
3%5% 4% 5%
7% 5%
25%21%
23%
22%20% 23%
33%26%
31%
19%23%
23%
28%25%
23% 24%24% 26%
24%
1%0%
0%
0%1%
0%
0%
0% 1%
0%
1%
0%
0%1% 0% 0%
1% 0%0%
14%19%
27% 14% 21% 18%
14%19%
9%
14%
18%
20%
23% 16% 16% 15%18%
14% 17%
39%33% 32% 39%
36% 36% 31% 34%
40% 48%36%
32%36%
37% 37% 37%32%
36% 35%
6% 5% 4% 4% 3% 5% 6% 4%8% 5% 7%
3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 5% 5% 6%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)
25Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)
9%
26%17% 14% 16% 19% 16%
8%13%
8% 10%
22% 23%16% 15% 13%
17% 19% 20%9%
10%
10% 17% 10%8% 16%
17%15%
7%9%
15% 13%
12% 11% 14%13%
15% 15%15%
12%
14%12%
12%14%
19%
15%18%
14%
17%
10% 15%
15%14% 15%
13%
16% 15%
1%
1%
1% 0%1%
1%
1%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%1%
1%1% 0%
1%
0% 0%
18%
13%19% 17%
20% 15%
14%
17%12%
17%
20%
17% 8%
14% 16% 16%19% 10%
14%
43%
33% 36% 38% 39% 38%29%
37% 39%
51%41%
33%35% 39% 39% 40%
34%35%
32%
4% 4% 3% 2% 2% 4% 4% 5% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 4%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
26Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)
15%24%
18% 16%21% 19% 17%
22%14%
19%14%
26%17% 15%
20% 18%24%
15%23%
2%
3%
3% 8% 1% 3%3%
5%
3%2%
3%
3%
2%1%
3%4%
3%
7%
3%
32%
24%
27%31%
29% 27%
41% 29%
35% 24% 32%
27%
32% 36%27% 28%
31%34% 27%
1%0%
0%
0%1%
0%
1%
1%1%
0%
1%
0%0%
1%0% 0%
1%1%
0%11%12%
14%
11%10%
10%
8%
8%
7%
8%
10%
12%
8%11%
9% 11%
8%8% 11%
36% 31% 35%33% 36% 36%
26%31%
38%45%
35%30%
38%33%
35% 36%30% 31% 30%
3% 5% 3% 2% 2% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
27Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)
8%15%
9% 11% 13% 14%8%
4%13% 16%
8%14%
9% 10% 9% 8%14%
7% 7%
12%
12%
11%
20% 14% 11%16%
20%
11% 9%
11%
18%
12% 10% 12% 15%
14%
16% 16%
22%
21%
19%
16%17% 23% 26%
21%26%
17%21%
17%32%
27% 22% 21%
21%22% 19%
0%
1%
1%
1%1%
1%1%
0%
1%
1%1%
0%0%
1%1% 0%
0%0%
1%
29%
28%38% 22% 29%
29% 25%32% 16%
22% 29%
29%24%
26%28% 30%
27%27%
27%
26%19% 19% 27%
23% 19%20% 19%
27% 32%26%
19% 17% 24% 24% 23% 21% 24%25%
3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 5% 5% 3% 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
28Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)
12%
28%23% 22%
27% 27%22% 18% 18% 15% 17%
24% 27%
17% 18% 16%
31%22% 25%
6%
7%
6% 11%6% 6%
9%11%
8%
4%6%
7% 4%
9% 8% 8%
5%
7%7%19%
16%20% 14% 17% 16%
25%18% 25%
16%
18%
14%
30%
17% 19% 20%
19%
20%20%
1%
0%0% 0%
2%0%
1%
0%0%
1%
1%1%
0%
1%1% 0%
0%
0%0%
17%
13% 14%13%
13%13%
10%
11% 6%
14%
17%17%
4%
14% 13% 14%
8%
9%10%
42%32% 34% 39% 33% 35% 31%
36% 39%50%
38%35% 32%
39% 38% 39%34%
39% 33%
3% 4% 3% 0% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
29Source: SCA Census 2010, n=9105
Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By kingdom)
17%26% 24%
18% 20%24%
20% 23%17%
21%16%
26%17% 18% 18% 16%
24%17% 20%
9%
9% 11%17% 9%
7% 13%16%
13%9%
8%
9%
12% 8% 8% 14%
14%
9%
13%
23%
20% 20% 18%21% 21%
29% 20%
25%17%
25%
20% 30%
24% 24%21%
24%
25%19%
1%
0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
1%0%
0%
0%1%
1%0%
1% 1% 0%
0%
1% 1%14%
12% 15%12% 15% 13%
10%11%
7%14%
15%
15% 6%15% 12% 14%
7%
14% 9%
33% 29% 27% 34% 29% 30%24%
27%34% 38% 31%
28%30% 31%
33% 31%27%
32%31%
3% 4% 4% 1% 3% 4% 3% 4% 4% 1% 4% 2% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3%7%
Æthelm
earc
Ansteorra
An Tir
Artem
isia
Atenveldt
Atlantia
Caid
Calontir
Drachenw
ald
Ealdorm
ere
East
Gleann
Abhann
Lochac
Meridies
Middle
Northshield
Outlands
Trimaris
West
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
30
11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?
These were then asked…
Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?
By Participation
31
1% 2% 1% 2% 2%4% 3% 4% 2% 3%
36%42%
36% 39% 37%
0%
0%
0%0% 0%
36%30%
37% 33% 35%
20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
3% 3% 2% 3% 3%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By participation)
32Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By participation)
12% 8%13% 10% 11%
4%4%
5%3% 4%
24% 31% 24%27% 25%
0% 1% 0% 0% 0%
18% 16% 18% 21% 21%
35% 36% 36%34% 34%
5% 4% 5% 5% 5%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
33Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By participation)
16% 14% 17% 13% 14%
12%10%
12%10% 11%
14% 19% 14%16% 15%
1% 1% 1%1% 1%
16% 14% 16% 18% 18%
37% 39% 37% 37% 37%
4% 3% 4% 5% 4%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
34Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By participation)
19%14%
20%14% 16%
3%3%
3%
2% 2%
30%34%
30%
31% 30%
1% 1%0%
1% 1%
10% 10% 10%13% 13%
34% 36% 34% 34% 35%
3% 3% 3% 4% 4%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
35Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By participation)
10% 10% 10% 9% 10%
13% 14% 13%11% 12%
22% 23% 21%23% 22%
1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
29% 27% 28% 31% 31%
22% 21% 23% 20% 20%
4% 4% 3% 4% 4%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
36Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By participation)
21% 19% 22% 18% 21%
7%5%
7%5%
5%
19% 24% 18%21% 19%
1% 1% 0%1% 1%
13% 12% 12% 16% 15%
36% 35% 36% 35% 36%
3% 4% 3% 4% 4%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
37Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By participation)
20% 16%21%
16% 18%
10%11%
11%
9%9%
23% 26%22%
24% 22%
1% 1% 1%1% 0%
13% 14% 12%17% 15%
30% 28% 30% 29% 30%
4% 4% 3% 4% 4%
Current
participant
Past participant
Current
participantpaid m
ember
Current
participant not paid m
ember
Current
participant past paid m
ember
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
38
11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?
These were then asked…
Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?
By Activity
39
2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2%7%
4% 3% 5% 6% 4%
32%33% 36% 31% 33% 35%
0%0%
0%0%
0% 0%
39% 41% 36% 37% 30% 36%
17% 18% 21% 22% 27%21%
3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By activity)
40Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By activity)
20%15% 12% 14% 14% 12%
7%
6%4%
5% 5% 5%
19%
21%24%
22% 22% 23%
0%1% 1% 0% 1% 1%
18%18% 19% 20%
13% 17%
30%35% 36%
33%41% 36%
6% 6% 6% 6% 4% 6%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
41Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By activity)
22% 18%11% 14%
19%13%
17%14%
11%16%
15%
12%
10%11%
14%
11%12%
12%
1%1%
1%1%
1%
1%
15%15%
23%19%
12%20%
31%36% 37% 34% 38% 37%
4% 5% 3% 5% 3% 4%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
42Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By activity)
29%22%
16% 20% 23%17%
4%
3%
2%3%
3%4%
26%
28%32%
31% 27%30%
1%
1%1%
0% 1% 1%
9%10% 13%
12%8% 12%
28%33% 33% 29% 35% 32%
4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
43Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By activity)
14% 11% 9% 10%4%
11%
17%14%
12% 13%
11%
12%
18%21%
21% 18%24%
20%
1%1%
1% 0% 1%1%
27%26%
31% 30% 31%30%
19% 22% 23% 24% 27% 23%
4% 4% 4% 5% 3% 4%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
44Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By activity)
32%25%
19%24% 27%
17%
10%
8%
7%8% 6%
8%
14%
15%
17%15% 17%
15%
1%
1%
1%0%
1%
1%
11%12%
15%14% 9%
18%
29%34% 38%
34% 37% 38%
4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
45Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By activity)
29%23% 19% 21%
25%18%
14%
12%10% 11%
13%
10%
18%
21%23% 21%
18%
21%
1%
1%1% 1%
1%
1%
11%12%
14% 14% 9%16%
23%28% 30% 29% 30% 31%
4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3%
Armored
Rapier
Target archery
Com
bat archery
Equstrian
Thrown-
SiegeOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
46
11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?
These were then asked…
Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?
By type of highest level of award
47
1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4%2% 3% 3% 4% 5% 7%
16%
43%36% 37% 31%
32% 32%18%
0%
1% 0%0%
0% 0% 0%
32%38% 39%
40%42%
28% 31%
19% 20% 18% 21%17%
27% 26%
2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 5% 4%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By type of highest level of award )
48Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)
8% 9% 12% 13% 17% 19%27%
3% 4%4% 5%
8% 6%
14%
29% 26%24% 21%
19% 22%
9%
0% 1% 0% 0%
0%0%
1%21% 22% 19%18%
19% 9%10%
35% 35%36% 38%
31%36% 33%
4% 3% 5% 6% 6% 8% 5%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
Peerage
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
49Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)
11% 11%16% 18% 19%
25% 28%9% 10%11%
13% 14%
17%
26%
17% 17%14%
11%11%
14%
7%
1% 1%1% 1%
0%
1%2%
19%20% 18% 14%
16%
6%4%
40%39% 38% 39% 35% 31% 30%
3% 2% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
Peerage
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
50Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)
11% 12%19%
23% 23%30%
43%
3% 3%
3%3% 5%
4%
11%
32%34%
30%27% 27%
27%
13%
1%1%
0%0% 0%
0%
2%
14%13% 11% 8% 9%
4%
1%
37%35% 34% 35% 32% 29% 27%
3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 5% 4%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
Peerage
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
51Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)
6% 9% 10% 12% 13% 12% 13%10%
9%12%
14%17% 20%
28%25% 22%22%
19%17%
20%11%
1% 2%0% 0% 0%
0% 1%
35% 33% 31% 26% 25% 14% 16%
20% 23% 21% 25% 23% 27% 25%
3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 6%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
Peerage
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
52Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)
14% 16% 20%25% 28% 32%
42%5%
6%7%
8%8%
9%
14%
24%22%
19%14%
15%17%
7%
1% 1% 0% 0%0%
0%
2%
18% 16% 13% 9%
12% 3%
3%
35% 37%37% 40%
33% 33%28%
3% 1% 3% 3% 4% 6% 3%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
Peerage
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
53Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized?(By type of highest level of award)
13% 17% 20%26% 24% 27%
38%6%
8%10%
13% 15%16%
22%
26%26%
24%
18% 19%19%
8%
1%
1%0%
0% 0%0%
2%
20%17% 13% 8%
11% 3%
2%
30%29% 30% 32%
27%30% 25%
4% 2% 3% 3% 4% 6% 4%
None
Award
without AoA
AoA level
Grant
level
Court
Barony
Peerage (C
hiv, Pel, Lau)
Royal
Peerage
Other
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
54
11,701 respondents answered 'Yes‘ in Q45. Should SCA participants be able to receive a peerage for excellence in non-armored combat or other martial activities (for example, fencing, archery and the like)?
These were then asked…
Q46. How should the following additional martial activities be recognized?
By type of peerage currently held
55
5%1% 1% 4%
23%
8% 7%
16%
14%
32% 30%
18%
0% 0%0% 0%
29%27%
27%31%
24% 27% 29%26%
5% 4% 6% 4%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Fencing/Rapier/Light Fighting peerage be recognized? (By type of peerage currently held)
56Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target/Combat Archery peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)
38%
15%21%
27%
18%
7%5%
14%
7%
22%20%
9%
2%
0% 1%1%
6%
9% 10%10%
23%
38% 36%
33%
7% 8% 8% 5%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
57Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Target Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)
31%21%
27% 28%
37%
17%15%
26%
2%
15%13%
7%
2%
0%1%
2%
6%
6%7%
4%
16%
36% 30%30%
5% 6% 7% 5%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
58Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Combat Archery only peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)
51%
28% 31%
43%
11%
5% 4%
11%
13%
27% 24%
13%
2%
0% 1%
2%
3%
2% 5%
1%
16%
32% 30%
27%
4% 5% 7% 4%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
59Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should an Equestrian peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)
15%9% 12% 13%
39%
20% 19%28%
6%
21% 17%
11%
1%
1%1%
1%
12%
13%15%
16%
19%28% 29%
25%
7% 7% 7% 6%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
60Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Thrown Weapons peerage be recognized?(By type of peerage currently held)
51%
27%33%
42%
19%
8%
9%
14%
2%
19%
15%
7%
2%
0%1%
2%
3%
2%3%
3%
18%
37%31%
28%
5% 6% 7% 3%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize
61Source: SCA Census 2010
Q46. How should a Siege Weapons peerage be recognized? (By type of peerage currently held)
43%
22%28%
38%
28%
17%15%
22%
5%
19%17%
8%
2%
0% 0%
2%
2%
3% 3%
2%
16%
33% 30%
25%
4% 6% 7% 4%
Knight
Laurel
Pelican
Royal
PeerageOther
Within shared
Within own
Within Pelican
Within Chivalry
Within Laurel
Don't recognize