ACUÑA GONZÁLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant...
-
Upload
andresabelr -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of ACUÑA GONZÁLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant...
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
1/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE
COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDERTHE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORY
S.AS. Case Study
MARIANA ACUA GONZALEZ*
IBL
TILBURG UNIVERSITYJune, 2010
*Beneficiaria Colfuturo 2009 -2010
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
2/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 1
ABSTRACT
The Legal Transplant Theory proposed by A. Watson, K. Pistor and D. Berkowitz is defined as
movement of a rule or a system of lawfrom one country to another. Under this theory, the
mentioned authors conclude that a legal change does not perform in an equal manner in the
transplanting country as in the origin country. They argue that the adoption of it in the latter is the
result of a comprehensive study of the socio-economic circumstances of the nation, while
transplanting countries import the legal entity without having similar circumstances. Furthermore,
under this theory, the successfulness of a legal transplant is determined by an adaptation process
that the legislator, the governmental institutions and the society of the transplanting country shall
undertake to prepare the scenario for the introduction. In consequence, transplanted legal
changes are called to fail due to uninformed or erroneous decision made by the law-makers. Pistor
and Berkowitz analyzed company regulation in various countries, among them Colombia, to
support their theories. Regarding the Colombian case, they referred to the Codes of Commerce of
1853 and 1887, concluding that they were unsuccessful legal transplants from Spain and Chile,
respectively. This paper analyzes the abovementioned theory pretending to determine if the legal
transplant theory was correctly applied to the Colombian case. Particular attention deserves the
Sociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S), which is a new hybrid business form adopted inColombia as a transplant from the United States Limited Liability Company. In the light of this
case, the document will determine whether this is called to be an unsuccessful legal transplant (as
predicted by the Legal Transplant Theory). If the answer is negative, the document will determine
if the S.A.S. is merely an exception of the theory or if it demonstrates the failure of such
assumption.
Keywords: Company Law, Dogmas of Company Law, Legal Transplant Theory, Limited Liability
Company (LLC), Socit par actions simplifies (SAS), Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada (S.A.S.).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_law -
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
3/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 4
II. CORPORATE LAW, TOWARDS A FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE 7
1. BACKGROUND OF HYBRID BUSINESS FORMS 7
1.1. United States Business Law 8
1.2. French Business Law 10
1.3. Colombian Business Law 122. BUSINESS LAW DOGMAS 14
2.1. Plurality of shareholders: 14
2.2. Minimum Capital Requirement: 16
2.3. Maximum Duration Term of the Company: 17
2.4. Specific Corporate Purpose: 18
3. IMPORTANCE OF HYBRID FORMS 19
III. LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORY 22
1. OVERVIEW OF LEGAL TRANSPLANT 22
2. EFFECTS OF THE LEGAL TRANSPLATS 26
3. LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORY. THE KEYSTONE FOR LEGAL CHANGES? 28
3.1. Analysis of the Legal Transplant Theory 28
3.2. Analysis Undertook by Pistor and Berkowitz Regarding Colombia 32
IV. INTRODUCTION OF HYBRID BUSINESS FORMS 35
1. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC): THE US BUSINESS FORM 35
1.1. Characteristics of the Limited Liability Company 372. SOCIT PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIES (S.A.S): THE FRENCH BUSINESS FORM 39
2.1. Characteristics of the Socit par Actions Simplifies (S.A.S) 39
3. SOCIEDAD POR ACCIONES SIMPLIFICADA (S.A.S.): THE COLOMBIAN BUSINESS FORM 40
3.1. Economical Circumstances in Colombia Before the S.A.S 40
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
4/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 3
3.2. Colombian Company Law before the Introduction of the S.A.S. 43
3.3. Characteristics of the Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada (S.A.S.) 44
3.4. Analysis of the Sociedades por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) 46
3.4.1. S.A.S.S Incorporation: A Conscious and Informed Choice 46
3.4.2. Flexibility Introduced by the S.A.S. 48
3.4.3. Exponential Number of Start-Up Companies Using the S.A.S. 50
3.4.4. Nationwide Adoption of the Sociedad Por Acciones Simplificada (S.A.S.) 53
3.4.5. Colombian Improvements in Numbers 54
V. CONCLUSION 55
VI. REFERENCES 58
TABLES AND FIGURES
FIGURES
FIGURE 1. US Company Law Structure 10
FIGURE 2. French Company Law Structure 12
FIGURE 3. Colombian Company Law Structure 14
FIGURE 4. Chronological Line: Colombian Company Law History 24
FIGURE 5. Limited Partnership Vs Limited Liability Company 36
FIGURE 6. Foreign Investment in Colombia 41
FIGURE 7. Start-up Companies Created in Colombia 50
FIGURE 8. Start-up Companies in Colombia 51
FIGURE 9. S.A.S Creation. January 2009April 2010 52
FIGURE 10. S.A.S. in Colombia Geographical Distribution (January 2009April 2010) 53
TABLES
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the Traditional Colombian Company Structures 13TABLE 2. Unemployment Rate in Colombia 42
TABLE 3. Colombian Business Environment Ranking 54
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
5/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 4
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT
THEORY
S.AS. Case Study
I. INTRODUCTION
The recent past has witnesses the continuous interest of law-makers in new business forms
which mitigate the rigidness of preexisting company forms, characterized by requirements such as
the minimum capital requirement or the plurality of shareholders. Indeed, a globalized world
claims for a reduction in the transaction costs, and the flexibilization of the corporate
requirements, in order to facilitate the cross border negotiations. This contrast with the traditional
corporate forms that countries as the United States, France and Colombia have offered to their
entrepreneurs i.e. Partnership or Corporations in the US, Socit responsabilit limite or Socit
Anonyme in France, and Sociedad Limitada or Sociedad Annima in Colombia. Those types of
business forms were criticized for their liability regime or their taxation regime, disadvantages that
discouraged the foreign investment and made difficult the start-up of companies. Such corporate
schemes demanded further requirements, such as plurality of shareholders, minimum capital
requirement, maximum duration term or specific corporate purpose. Nevertheless, rather than
been instruments for promoting the entrepreneurship, such requisites are considered negative
factors inhibiting the organization of new companies. For instance, if an entrepreneur did not have
the minimum capital required for setting-up a company, he would be discouraged from its
venture. In consequence, smaller investors did not have any opportunity to make their own
business. Such disadvantages limit the amount of companies that are incorporated in a country
per year, which in turn has an unconstructive influence in the economy. For these reasons, the
legislators focus their attention in the business forms as a cornerstone of the country
development, creating new company forms which take advantage from the positive characteristics
of existing regimes, even combining their features with the beneficial characteristics of others. As
a result, there is the perfect scenario to the origin of hybrid business forms.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
6/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 5
Nevertheless, in some countries the legislator rather than adopting original business forms to
incentivize the growth of the socio-economic environment of its own country, imitates successful
legal entities from other countries expecting to achieve similar positive results. This movement of
a rule or asystem of lawfrom one country to another is recognized as legal transplant, concept
created by Alan Watson, under which the origin country is the one who initially adopted the rule
or legal system, and the transplant countries are those who import their law from another country
or countries rather than developing it domestically. Furthermore, this concept was studied by K.
Pistor and D. Berkowitz under the analysis of the behavior of legal changes transplanted in some
countries in comparison with their origin countries. The conclusion of the mentioned work was
that a legal transplant has high probabilities of fail because most of the legal changes introduced inthe transplanting countries are the consequence of an erroneous decision, without analyzing the
conditions of the country and lacking an adaptation process. These authors sustain that the
successfulness of a legal transplant is only the result of a comprehensive law-makers analysis
about the necessity of the legal change and the level of preparation of the society and the
governmental institutions to receive the new legal figure. Along with the latter elements, it is
essential the presence of the social demand of the legal changes, since the legal change shall
correspond with such a demand. According to this theory, the absence of the abovementioned
elements determines the failure of the transplant; the so-called transplant effect.
Although the Pistors and Berkowitzs analysis of legal transplant is based in United Kingdom,
United States, France and Germany as origin countries, and Colombia, Spain, Chile, Malaysia, Israel
and Japan as transplanting countries, the scope of this paper is limited to United States and
France as origin countries and Colombia as a transplanted country, bear in mind that the
groundwork of this paper is the S.A.S. case study, which is the Colombian new hybrid business
form structured according to the US Limited Liability Company and adopted under the French
name Socit par actions simplifies(SAS). It is important to establish that even though the United
States was a transplanting country during its period as a British colony, nowadays it is considered a
origin country.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_law -
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
7/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 6
Pistor and Berkowitz analyzed the Colombian case as a transplant country, studying the Codes
of Commerce of 1853 and 1887, which were transplanted from Spain and Chile, respectively. The
Code of 1853 was the first code of commerce adopted in Colombia after having achieved its
independence from Spain. On the other hand, the Code of 1887 was issued after the transition of
Colombia as a federal republic to a unitary republic, which requires from the central government
the adoption of harmonized regulation applicable to all the country. Pistor and Berkowitz reduced
their studied to those two Codes without observing the development of other Colombian
institutions, taking into account that Colombia is a country with great variety of transplanted legal
entities. As a result, Pistor and Berkowitz concluded that these codes were adopted by the
Colombian legislator under the basis of an erroneous decision, according to Pistor, or anuninformed decision, proposed by Berkowitz. In consequence, they were unsuccessful legal
changes since these transplants had no significant effects on the countryseconomy.
The present paper analyzes the abovementioned theory pretending to determine if the legal
transplant theory was correctly applied to the Colombian case and if it is the explanation not only
of the failures of the Codes of Commerce of 1853 and 1887, but also of the unsuccessful of other
legal changes translated by Colombia from countries as France and the US. For the achievement of
this purpose, it is important to determine that Colombian legal system was transplanted fromSpain, whose system was in turn imported from the French civil law. Additionally, in the last years,
Colombia had transplanted legal entities from the US, as the Sociedad por Acciones Simplificadas
(S.A.S), which is the reproduction of the US Limited Liability Company (LLC).For this reason, the
S.A.S. will be evaluated in the light of the legal transplant theory, studying the characteristics of
this new company form and the results that the S.A.S. has brought to Colombia. In the light of this
case, the document will determine whether this is called to be an unsuccessful legal transplant (as
predicted by the Legal Transplant Theory). If the answer is negative, the document will determine
if the S.A.S. is merely an exception of the theory or if it demonstrates the failure of such
assumption.
In order to address this analysis, the Section II of this paper illustrates the development of
Company Law in the last years, in United States, France and Colombia. This section exhibits the
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
8/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 7
traditional businesses forms in each country, their principal characteristics and the requirements
to their conformation. Therefore, particular reference is made to the business law dogmas,
revealing how their disadvantages have opened the door to the creation of the hybrid business
forms. On the other hand, in Section III the Legal Transplant Theory proposed by A. Watson, K.
Pistor and D. Berkowitz is exposed. Firstly, the legal transplant concept and its general
characteristics are explained. Secondly, the legal transplant effect and its consequences are
described. Lastly, a critical analysis of the legal transplant theory is provided, with particular regard
to its implications to the Colombian case. Finally, Section III describes the principal hybrid business
forms issued in United States, France and Colombia, presenting their characteristics and their
achievements, with the purpose to draw a comparison. Furthermore, the section presents acomprehensive description of the socio-economic environment of Colombia before, during and
after the introduction of the S.AS. Thereafter, it is established the influence that the S.A.S has in
the Colombian economy, nowadays, in order to apply the legal transplant theory and determine
its impact in this new company form.
II. CORPORATE LAW, TOWARDS A FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE
1. BACKGROUND OF HYBRID BUSINESS FORMSIn recent years, the business law has shown a continuing development, aiming at creating new
business forms that allow the start-up companies to be part of the globalized world. The latter is a
response of the inflexibility of the corporate forms, which involves a barrier to entrepreneurship,
i.e. reflected in minimum amounts of capital. However, this innovative tendency is not only
favorable to start-up companies, but also to consolidate companies which are willing to expand.
This is the case of a multinational holding investing in a new country in terms of equity. If its
purpose is to create a new entity, the plurality requirement is the first obstacle, since it is
necessary to find a partner just to create the intended company. Clearly, this is a risky decision,
since it involves moral hazard and adverse selection problems.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
9/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 8
The abovementioned barriers are imposed by traditional corporate forms, such as the
Corporation or the Partnership in the United States. As will be discussed, they establish strict
requirements, based in traditional corporate law dogmas. Nevertheless, these dogmas are called
into question by modern doctrine, since their basis and purposes are ineffective. As a result, by
removing them, corporate forms are able to be more flexible and consequently more accurate to
the requirements of investors.
In this set of circumstances, the response to the traditional corporate forms is found in new
entities known as hybrid business forms. They can be considered as a combination of partnership
law and corporate law. Examples of them are the limited liability partnership (hereinafter LLP)
and limited liability company (hereinafter LLC) in the US, as well as their Japanese counterparts,
the J-LLP and J-LLC.
The hybrid business form adopted in Colombia is found in the Sociedades por Acciones
Simplificadas(S.A.S.). Since this business form is inspired in the American and French model, the
company law of these countries will be addressed, parallel to Colombian. In doing so, the first step
will be to discuss the traditional corporate forms in each country. Then, it will be revealed how the
traditional dogmas are embraced by the conventional company forms, highlighting the barriers
that they create. This allows us to demonstrate the importance of the hybrid business forms, in
the final stage of this section.
1.1. United States Business LawCompany Law is not a matter of federal regulation in the United States, and consequently, the
regulation on this issue is adopted by each State. As a result, the applicable business law in the
United States is determined by the entrepreneur, at the moment of setting up the company.
However, the most important company law regulation in the United States is found in Delaware.
For this reason, this section is focused on the referred regulation. In this respect, the principal
business forms we are addressing are the General Partnership, the Corporation, the LLC and the
LLP.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
10/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 9
The partnership was the dominant business entity from Roman times until the end of the
nineteenth century. It is characterized by the unlimited personal liability of its owners, since each
partner can manage the partnership. Moreover, depending of the jurisdiction and partnership
structure, this entity could have a favorable taxation regime, since in most of the cases partnership
does not incur a tax on profits before it is distributed to the partners.
Afterwards, with the emergence of the business corporation, the partnership lost prominence.
Particularly, the lack of limited liability made the latter less attractive than the corporations.
Indeed, the Corporations are separated legal entities, which count with legal personality. In
consequence, the member of it had limited liability, which means that the obligations of these
companies were bonded only by the assets held in the name of the firm itself.1This implies that
companies are considered as separate tax contributors, and as a result, pass through taxation is
impossible under it. Consequently, shareholders are not able to offset losses from the company
under their own creditworthy.
In spite of its advantages, the latter business form generates skepticism, because the lack of
personal liability and the weakness of the bankruptcy procedure made it difficult to guarantee the
creditworthy of the firm in front creditors and it was complicated to avoid opportunistic acts.
Consequently, it was established the limited partnership, whose main feature is the establishment
of limited liability for investors who do not have any management function in the entity.
Although, the abovementioned changes of the business law, it was necessary the creation of
hybrid forms that bring together the qualities of both type of firms (partnership and corporation),
and that eliminated the old dogmas of the company law with the objective of remove the rigid
requirements in the conformation and development of the explained business forms. For this
reason, in the United States was established the LLC, which is going to be studied in the third
chapter of the present paper.
1H. Hansmann et. al., The New Business Entities in Evolutionary Perspective. February 2005.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
11/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 10
FIGURE 1. US Company Law Structure
1.2. French Business LawThere are numerous types of company structures which are provided by French Law, such as
Socit anonyme (SA), Socit responsabilit limite (SARL), Socit en nom collectif (SNC),
Socit en commandite simple (SCS), and Socit en commandite par actions (SCA). However
today the great majority of trading entities in France have taken the form either of a Socit
Anonyme(S.A.) or a Socit Responsabilit Limite (S.A.R.L.).
Under a theoretic approach, the French tradition draws differences between companies of
capital and so-called companies of persons2. The latter is built under the Latin concept of intuitu
person, which implies that the company is created regarding the qualities of the counterparties.
Although highly criticized, this classification is useful to understand some key issues in each
corporate form. The prototypical company of persons is the Socit en nom collectif (SNC), since
all the partners are able to act on behalf of the company, and consequently, they are personally
liable for the obligations of the company. This implies confidence among partners, since the acts of
any of them can compromise the interest of the others and their liability. As a result, the
2Socit de capitaux and socit de personnes
Mariana Acua 2010
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
12/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 11
participation is not freely transferable, because the rest of the partners are not willing to be
responsible for the acts of an unknown third party.
Contrastingly, instead of parts of interest, the companies of capital are capitalized by shares.
This is not only a grammatical difference, since the latter can be freely transferable and the
shareholders are generally unidentified in front of the public. Additionally, shareholders are
generally separated from management, and consequently, their liability is limited to the amount
of their investment3. The classical example of companies of capital in France is the Socit
anonyme (SA), and can be comparable with the American Corporations, while the Socit en nom
collectif (SNC) are equivalent to the US Partnerships.
Additionally, the Socit responsabilit limite (SARL) can be considered as an intermediate
figure, since it grants limited liability to the partners, while keeping characteristics of the
companies of persons. For instance, they have a maximum limit of partners (100)4, and
consequently, they cannot be traded in the public stock market. Furthermore, the Socits en
commandite (SCS and SCA) also combine the characteristics of corporations and partnerships,
regarding the liability of each partner. Indeed, they require two types of partners: limited and
general. The former are investors, whose liability is restricted to the amount of their contribution,
which can be in shares (SCA) or in parts of interest (SCS). On the contrary, the general partners are
personally liable, since they are responsible for the management of the company. In general
terms, they can be compared with the Limited Partnerships under US law.As a response to the
barriers established by the corporate law dogmas discussed below, the French company law has
introduce new figures. They are Socit par actions simplifies (SAS), Entreprise unipersonnelle
responsabilit limite (EURL), which will be analyzed in a later stage.
3Although shareholders can take part in management, the responsibility derived from fiduciary duties is not
the same as the limited liability as shareholder.4French Code of Commerce, see L223-1 to L223-43.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
13/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 12
FIGURE 2. French Company Law Structure
1.3. Colombian Business LawAs the French regulation, Colombian company structures can be classified as companies of
capital and companies of persons. The Colombian Code of Commerce establishes the principal
types of companies, whose characteristics are very close to their French counterparties.
Traditionally, the Colombian company law regulated the Sociedad Annima (S.A.);Limited Liability
Company (Sociedad Limitada (Ltda)); Collective Company (Sociedad Colectiva); Sociedades en
Cominadita.
Mariana Acua 2010
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
14/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 13
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the Traditional Colombian Company Structures
SociedadAnonima SociedadColectiva Sociedades enComandita SociedadLimitada
Legal statusIs the company able to
own assets, incur in
liabilities and to be a
party in a contract?
YES YES YES YES
Limited LiabilityIs Partners/Shareholders
liability restricted to their
contribution?
YES NOGeneralPartner
NOYES
LimitedPartner
YES
Management
Can
partners/shareholders
take part on
management?
NO YESGeneralPartner
YESYES
LimitedPartner
NO
Minimum number of
partners/shareholders 5 2 GeneralPartner 1 2LimitedPartner
1 (SCS)5 (SCA)
Maximum number of
partners/shareholders N/A N/A GeneralPartner N/A 25LimitedPartner
N/A
Are
partners/shareholders
publicly known? NO YESGeneral
Partner
YES
YESLimitedPartner
NO
Capital Shares Parts of interest SCA Shares Parts of interest
SCS Quotes
Is the interest in the
company freely
transferable?YES NO
GeneralPartner
NONO
LimitedPartner
NO (SCS)YES (SCA
All the corporate forms require the partners/shareholders to define a specificcorporate purpose and maximum duration term of the company.
Equivalent counterparts
in France and US Societe AnonymeCorporation Socit en nomcollectif GeneralPartnership
Socits encommandite
Limited Partnership
Socit Responsabilit
LimiteMariana Acua 2010
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
15/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 14
Furthermore, before the introduction of new hybrid forms (Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada
S.A.S.5), there already were two kinds of business forms that reformed the Colombian corporate
law: Sole Proprietor Enterprise(Empresa Unipersonal) and Single Shareholder Company (Sociedad
Unipersonal). This flexible business forms will be discussed later. At this stage, it is sufficient to
present an overview of the most important Colombian Business Law structures.
FIGURE 3. Colombian Company Law Structure
2. BUSINESS LAW DOGMAS2.1. Plurality of shareholders:
This requirement is referred to the number of members that are necessary to create the
business forms. Its origin is found in the traditional understanding of companies as a contract,
5This type of company is going to be explaining in detail in chapter 3.
Mariana Acua 2010
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
16/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 15
which implies the agreement between two or more parties6. The treatment of this plurality
requirement varies from one jurisdiction to another, and each corporate entity has its own
regulation under this requisite. For instance, the French Socit Anonyme (S.A.) requires a
minimum of 7 shareholders, the Socit Responsabilit Limite (S.A.R.L.) habitually has a
minimum of 2 shareholders. Besides, in the United States, the general partnership is established
by at least two partners. In contrast, the Corporation does not have any requirement of
shareholders.
A similar situation is found Colombia. Indeed, the Collective Company (Sociedad Colectiva)7
requires a minimum of two shareholders and there is no maximum limit for the existence of the
company. Furthermore, the Limited Liability Company (Sociedad Limitada, Ltd) established that it
is indispensable minimum two members and maximum twenty five shareholders. Finally, the
Sociedad Annima (S.A.) has to be conformed for a minimum of five shareholders and there is no
maximum requirement. These limits are mandatory, bear in mind, that it is not allow, for
example, to create a Sociedad Limitadawith twenty six or more members. Furthermore, if during
the development of the company the number of partners exceeds the legal limit the firm has to be
dissolved or at least it has to be transformed in different company form that allow the presence of
a higher number of shareholders. On the contrary, if the shareholders on a Sociedad Annima isreduced below the minimum number, the company has to be liquidated unless adequate measures
are adopted.
The new hybrid business forms eliminate this requirement, allowing that one person could
create a company alone without the presence of partner or shareholders.
6The adoption of the plurality concept is illustrated by the Colombian regulation. The Code of Commerce
defines the Company as a contract between two or more parties (article 98). Under the Civil Code, thecontract implies two or more parties (article 1495).7In the Sociedad Colectiva.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
17/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 16
2.2. Minimum Capital Requirement:
The capital required for the formation and development of a business form depends of the
legal regime and the structure of the company. However, it is generally established as a means to
protect third parties from companies behavior. Regulators expect this measure to be a warranty
for contractual and non-contractual liability of the company, granting a patrimony that creditors
can pursue.
In the United States the legal capital rules vary widely from State to State. In this regard, a
Delaware corporation must specify a par value for its shares (or that the shares are without par
value). Shares may not be issued by the corporation for any amount less than par value.
Limitations on the form of payment for shares are limited to the amount paid to cover par value 8.
On the other hand, in France the minimum capital necessary for the creation of a Socit Anonyme
(S.A.) is between 225.000 and 37.000 euro, which depends if the company trades publicly or if it is
not listed on a stock exchange. Furthermore, the Sociten nom Collectief (S.N.C.) and the Socit
Responsabilit Limite (SARL)do not have limit, it is determine by the shareholders.
The Colombian Code of Commerce9establishes that the shareholders have to determine
the maximum capital of the company, as an indispensable requirement for the constitution of a
firm. In this sense, the Colombian legislation does not determine quantitative limits of capital for
some corporate forms. Instead, it only regulates the way and the period of time the capital has to
be paid. In the case of the Sociedad Annima (S.A.) it is divided in authorized share capital,10
subscribed capital,11and paid capital12. The Colombias Commerce Code13ascertain that at least
the 50% of the authorized share capital has to be subscribed, and no less than the third part of the
8R. Booth. Capital Requirements in United States Corporation Law. School of law, University of Maryland.
Page 10. Available at SSRNhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=8646859Article 122 C.Co.10
This figure corresponds to the value or agreed by the founding shareholders as necessary to develop thepurpose of the company at the initial stage or within the near or far.11
It is part of the Authorized Capital shareholders have undertaken to cover, it corresponds to thecontributions that partnersgiveto society or promised to pay off in a period not to exceed 1 year. (Art. 387of C.Co.)12
It corresponds to the amount of subscribed shares that the shareholders have to pay.13
Article 375 C.Co.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=864685http://ssrn.com/abstract=864685http://ssrn.com/abstract=864685 -
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
18/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 17
price of each share of capital that is subscribed has to be paid at the moment of the creation of
the company. In a similar sense, the capital of any Sociedad Limitada (Ltda.) has to be paid at the
moment of its formation. Although, in some business forms there is no capital requirement it is
expressly determined that if the company loses more that its 50% of capital, it has to be dissolved.
At this stage, this requirement may seem as adequate to protect third parties from
opportunistic behavior from shareholders. Nevertheless, this is far from being adequate. First,
regimes which set quantitative minimum levels can be considered arbitrary. Think about the
French regulation of non-listed S.A. How can be determined that 225.000 is a fair limit? A second
critic calls into question the feasibility to prevent misbehaviors. Using the same French regulation,
any company can commit a fraud which exceeds by far the minimum requirement of capital. For
instance, a mining company can acquire obligations reaching millions of euro, and the corporate
capital can be insufficient in case of breach of certain obligations.
The New hybrid forms desire to make this dogma flexible or to abolish it, with the idea to
allow the small entrepreneurs to constitute their own company with the capital they have.
2.3. Maximum Duration Term of the Company:As the dogmas explained above, a requirement of duration of a company depends of the
legal regulation that each country has. As an illustration, French company law established that the
maximum time of existence of a commercial company is ninety nine years from the date of the
registration of such company on the Commercial Register. In contrast, although Colombian
Legislation does not establish a maximum duration term, it requires the investors to do so at the
moment of setting up the company.
No plausible reason can be found to justify this traditional dogma. On the contrary, when
fixing a certain maximum period, regulators appear to be arbitrary. One may call into question the
term established by the French regulation: why 99 and not 95 or 100 years? Additionally,
regulations as the Colombian are less than effective. Indeed, the temporary requirement is
circumvented by entrepreneurs in an easy way, determining long term companies.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
19/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 18
With the existence of the business hybrid forms this requirement is eradicate, because this
companies forms aim to allow the entrepreneur to constitute his own firm with the fewest
restrictions.
2.4. Specific Corporate Purpose:Some regulations require investors to determine a particular scope of action for the company
they are setting up. According to this principle, the capacity of the company is established, and its
acts have to be focused on the development of those objectives. The managers of the company
cannot perform out of this scope. In this respect, the French regulation determines that the
shareholders have to establish a legal purpose for the company. On the other hand, the Colombian
Code of Commerce requires the shareholders to determine in a clear and complete manner the
main activities of the company, as an indispensable requirement for the creation of the firm. The
stipulations of undetermined activities or activities that not have direct relationship with the scope
are null.
In this matter, the corporate law developed a doctrine called ultra vires, which means beyond
the powers. Under this theory, any act attempted by a corporation outside its particular purpose
is not legally binding, since the company lacks the capacity to perform them. Further, this doctrine
establishes that such acts cannot be ratified by the shareholders.
Nevertheless, although it can be plausible to determine the scope of action, such requirement
can be easily circumvented. The practice demonstrates that entrepreneurs make the scope of
action as broad as possible, making feasible to perform activities beyond the initial purposes. For
instance, initially a technology company can focus its purpose on the manufacture of computers,
but as the business expands so does the possibility to enter in new activities not originally
considered. Under this dogma, the company is obliged to modify its statutes in order to incur in
activities not initially mentioned. This generates high transaction costs and leads to inefficiencies.
On the contrary, it is called into question the differentiation between the capacity of natural
persons and legal entities, since the former are able to incur in any legal act of commerce.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
20/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 19
However, with the modification of the business law, this doctrine became obsolete because
the new hybrid forms allow the members of the companies to determine as a scope of the firm
every legal action, without restrict it to specific commercial activities.
3. IMPORTANCE OF HYBRID FORMSHybrid business forms have attracted attention from policy makers and entrepreneurs from all
over the world. This is due to their expansion and popularity, which has been bigger than
expected.14
Several factors have contributed to the growth of the new legal business forms. One of the
reasons is the regulatory competition in the whole world. In Europe, the Centros decision,15has
had its impact on the competition between countries on the area of lawmaking. Today, in Europe,
it is possible for start-up firms of all sizes to select a statutory seat anywhere in Europe. This
means that a start-up firm can choose to incorporate in another European country, regarding the
most favorable conditions.16As a result, many entrepreneurs started a company in the UK, using
the new LLP business form, since it is the most flexible business form in the EU. Also in the US,
different business forms of the LLC arose as a result of the competition between states.17
Thecompetition between countries also had its effect on the minimal capital requirements in different
EU member states. This led to the elimination or reduction of the minimal capital requirements.18
Furthermore, interest groups have played an important role in the introduction of the hybrid
business forms. According to the public choice theory, interest groups are needed when a
14J.A. McCahery, E.P.M. Vermeulen, Corporate Governance of Non-Listed Companies, Oxford University Press,
2008, p. 102.15
ECJ 9 March 1999, case C-212/97, ECR 1999, p. I-1459 (Centros Ltd. v. Erhvers-og Selskabsstyrelsen)16W. Bratton, J. McCahery, E. Vermeulen, How does Corporate Mobility affect lawmaking? A comparativeanalysis, Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2008-01, p. 3. Available at SSRNhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1086667.17
M. Siems, Regulatory Competition in Partnership Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly,2009, p. 767-80218
W. Bratton, J. McCahery, E. Vermeulen, How does Corporate Mobility affect lawmaking? A comparative
analyses, Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2008-01, p.7. Available at SSRNhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1086667.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
21/60
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
22/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 21
entrepreneur to act under a different name, although its liability is personal, as occurs with the
partnerships.
In contrast, the French Entreprise unipersonnelle responsabilit limite (EURL) does
create a new legal entity. This implies a separated patrimony and limited liability for the sole
proprietor.22 In Colombia, the regulation is similar to the French. Indeed, the Sole Proprietor
Enterprise (Empresa Unipersonal) creates the possibility to establish a new legal entity with a part
of the assets of a legal or natural person in order to perform commercial activities. Therefore, the
sole proprietor is protected by a limited liability regime and the traditional requirement of
plurality of shareholders was removed. Additionally, it is possible to create this enterprise by a
private document without the notarization requirements. Furthermore, when determining the
purpose and the duration of the company, the entrepreneur can state that the enterprise can
involve in any business, and that the enterprise is not subject to any temporal limitations.
Nevertheless, this entity does not have the legal status of a company.23 As a result, it excludes
other forms of business involving two or more investors.
A further hybrid business form in Colombia is the Single Shareholder Company (Sociedad
Unipersonal), a single entrepreneur was able to create a company. The entrepreneur could choose
between the Collective Company, Limited Liability Company (Ltda.), and the Anonymous Company
(S.A.) regimes. This new law was based on the principles stated before about the Sole Proprietor
Enterprise. Therefore, this corporate form represents an improvement of thelatter, introducing
the first formal companywithout the plurality requirement, and not just an enterprise vested
with legal entity.
Nevertheless, the Single Shareholder Company faced significant limitations, since it was just
available for the small companies (those with an amount of capital equivalent to US $ 126.605 in
2009 and with less than ten employees). This did not only exclude the middle and big enterprises,
but also excluded the successful entrepreneurs. Indeed, if a company who initially fulfilled the
22French Law number 85-697 of 11 July 1985.
23The Sole Proprietor Enterprise has been defined by the Colombian Constitutional Court as an enterprise vested with
legal entity (not as a company). C.A. Arcila Salazar, Simplified Joint Stock Company e-Mercatoria Legal Review.Available athttp://www.emercatoria.edu.co/PAGINAS/VOLUMEN8/PDF01/sociedad.pdf
http://www.emercatoria.edu.co/PAGINAS/VOLUMEN8/PDF01/sociedad.pdfhttp://www.emercatoria.edu.co/PAGINAS/VOLUMEN8/PDF01/sociedad.pdf -
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
23/60
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
24/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 23
was abused, leading to monopolistic power which was reflected, inter alia, in high taxes. As a
result, the US rapidly intended its independence as a country, and since the late eighteenth
century, its legal regime has been autonomous. Over the years, its regulatory importance
increased, and foreign countries became attracted by regulations within the US. For this reasons,
nowadays the United States is seen as an origin country, in which the judicial review plays a
relevant role for the adoption of legal changes and the legal developments depends directly of the
regulation made by each State. Particularly, Delawares law is the most significant company law
regulation, and is usually transplanted by foreign countries.
On the other hand, the French legal system belongs to the civil law tradition, like most of the
continental European countries. France is often classified as part of the Romano-Germanic family
of law, because of its historical links with both Roman law, and Germanic customary law. From the
thirteenth century, the Northern part of France was under the influence of droit coutumier
(Germanic tribe customs), and the Southern part was controlled by droit crit (Roman law
influence). During the Ancien Rgime (ancien droit), dated among the 16th century until the
Revolution, France emerged as a nation-State, under the strong centralization of royal authority.
The sources of law of that period included coutumes locales (local customs), Roman law, canon
law, royal ordinances, the case-law of the Parliaments, and doctrinal writings (doctrine). Law wastaught in the universities. Academic writers exercised an important influence on the development
of a droit commun (jus commune) through systematic expositions of the law. The period of the
Droit intermdiaire (1789-1803, between the Revolution and Napoleon), saw a period of
tumultuous and violent alteration to the social order. In the midst of much bloodshed, the
Revolution abolished ancient privileges, while establishing equality before the law, the guarantee
of individual liberties, and the protection of private property. It introduced a fundamental break
with regard to constitutional law, with the introduction of a written constitution separating
legislative, executive and judicial powers, and establishing a dual court structure, regular and
administrative courts. Napoleon's major achievement was the drafting of the Code Civil des
Franais, as well as four other codes which unified private law. Under this view, the French
Corporate Law is expressly regulated in legal mandates, without giving faculties to the judge to
create rules, the authority is given to the lawmakers, and the judges are only law applicants and
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
25/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 24
interpreters. Regarding this development, countries as Spain, with a clear influence of the civil law
regime, transplanted its civil and commercial law from France, adopting, for example, the
Napoleonic Code, which later has an impact in Latin America countries as Chile and Colombia.
Quite the opposite occurred in countries as Colombia, whose entire legal regime was mainly
transplanted from France, Spain, Chile, and in the last few years from the United States. During
the colonization period the Colombian Commercial Law was directly influence by the Spanish Law
by the Ordenanzas de Bilbao (Bilbaos Ordinances). The first Commercial Code was issued 1853,
which was almost an exact copy of the Spanish Commercial Code of 1829. However, with the
expedition of a new Constitution in 1886, Colombia ceases to be a federal State to be converted as
unitary Republic. As a result of these legal changes, it was issued a second Commercial Code in
1887, which was the recompilation of norms taken of the Commercial Code of the extinct State of
Panama, and the federal Government, which regulated the maritime commerce. Both legislations
were transplanted from the Chilean Law, which in turn it was a copy of the Spanish and French
legislation. On 1971, a new Commercial Code was issued. The articles were drafted in accordance
with the country's realities of the moment. For this reason, some of its rules are the reproduction
of norms sufficiently known and praised at that moment in the world. This new code had a direct
influence from several legislations, such as the Italian, French, Swiss, German, Venezuelan,Honduran and Argentinean. This code was written in accordance with the commercial situation
in America and in the world, and regarding the commercial experience acquired by Colombia
as an independent nation. This commercial code (adopted in 1971) is currently in force, and has
been partially amended and modified through the years.
FIGURE 4. Chronological Line: Colombian Company Law History
Colombian Independence
Federal Regime Unitary RepublicSpanish domain in
Colombia
1514 1819 1853 1886 1887 1971New Constitution New Constitution Second Code of Current Code of
First Code of Commerce Commerce Commerce
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
26/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 25
Furthermore, in 1999, Berkowitz et.al. (hereinafter Berkowitz) researched the influence of
effective legal institutions (or legality) on the economic development of transplant countries
regarding the process of transplanting a law.26 Berkowitz distinguished between receptive and
unreceptive transplant countries27, and between direct and indirect transplant countries28. A
receptive transplant country is a country that made an informed choice in deciding to adopt and
adapt the law or has familiarity with the chosen law. An unreceptive transplant country is a
country that lacks both of these conditions. On the other hand, a direct transplant country is a
country that obtained the law directly from the origin country29, and an indirect transplant country
is a country that obtained the law from another transplant country. For the purpose of this paper,
it is important to note that Berkowitz concluded that Colombia was an indirect-unreceptivetransplant country.
Additionally, Pistor et.al. (hereinafter Pistor) undertook a similar study which will be
discussed latter. However, at this stage is sufficient to state that both theories (Berkowitz and
Pistor) conclude that successful transplants are obtained only if prior the introduction of a new
law, the lawmaker studies its convenience and necessity in the light of the socioeconomic
environment of the country. It means that the modification of certain law has to correspond with
the social and economic demands of the country, since they determine its efficiency. Furthermore,lawmakers shall bear in mind that the success of a legal rule in one country does not guarantee
the same outcome in the transplant country. Indeed, the socioeconomic circumstances of origin
countries arenormally different than those on transplant countries, and their legal evolution tends
to take place continuously and gradually30. In contrast, in spite of having a long period of
evolution, transplanting countries tend to adopt radical legal changes. Pistor consider such
differences as the major causes of the failure of an imported law in a host country, as presented in
the following section.
26D. Berkowitz, K. Pistor, J. F. Richard, Economic Development, Legality and the Transplant Effect, 1999, p.
1-2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=183269. (Hereinafter: Berkowitz et.al.).27
Id. p. 10-13.28
Id. p. 13-15.29
The origin countries are those from which the transplanting countries adopt its law models.30
Id. K. Pistor et. al. p.91
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
27/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 26
2. EFFECTS OF THE LEGAL TRANSPLATS
As explained above, in order for a law to become as effective in a transplant country as it is in
an origin country, a demand for that particular law must already be present in the country to
facilitate the actual use of the law in practice. In addition, it was found that the legal institutions
must be swift in responding to this demand by developing the transplanted law according to the
specific needs and circumstances of the country. 31When these two circumstances are not present
in the country at the moment of the legal transplant, the effectiveness of the law will be lower
than in the origin country, the so-called transplant effect. Berkowitz concluded that every
transplant country is exposed to the transplant effect, unless it is a direct-receptive transplant
country.
Pistor and Berkowitz concluded that Colombian company law fits the general rule, rather than
the exception. In other words, the adoption of foreign laws was followed by the transplant effect,
since the performance of the transplanted law would be less effectively then in its country of
origin. Their analysis of the Colombian company law was limited to the codes of commerce
adopted in 1853 and 1887, which were transplanted from Spain and Chile, respectively. According
to Berkowitz, Colombian laws during this period were chosen and adopted without even
considering their contents.32
In 2003, Pistor delved into the development of corporate law all over the world.33Pistor found
clear distinctions in the development of corporate law between origin countries that developed
their respective corporate law systems internally and the transplant countries that copied and
adopted the entire (or part of the) corporate law of the origin countries into their legal systems.
Pistor observed two different patterns of change in the legal environments of transplant countries,
which in turn could not be detect in the origin countries. The first pattern is lethargy, while the
31Id. p. 2
32D. Berkowitz et. al. Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. European Economic Review
47 (2003), p. 180.33
K. Pistor, Y. Keinan, J. Kleinheisterkamp, M.D. West, The Evolution of Corporate Law: A Cross-CountryComparison, Columbia Law School Center For Law and Economic Studies , Working Paper No. 232, 2003, p. 3-7. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=419881
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
28/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 27
second pattern is the direct opposite, namely erratic change.34Pistor argued that the pattern of
erratic change could be found in French civil law countries, including among other countries,
Colombia. In this regard, Pistor uphold that with the Code of Commerce of 1853, which followed
the Spain model, Colombia enacted an unsuccessfully liberal corporate law, as a consequenceof
the economic backwardness of the country, which rendered corporate law largely irrelevant.35
Pistor also consider the Colombian Code of Commerce of 1887, based on the Chilean model, as
another erratic change. She concluded that this legal change occurred because lawmakers felt a
need to follow one of the most advanced legal systems in Latin America of the time, not because
there were particular domestic reasons for doing so.36
In conclusion, according to Pistor, the erratic changes in Colombia did not result directly
from the effect that the transplanted corporate law had on Colombian domestic affairs, but were
more due to the diverse choice of countries from which it decided to transplant corporate law. 37
Pistor pointed out that after several transplants of corporate law, Colombian corporate law was
still not much of a success, since these changes in corporate law did not have any significant effect
on Colombian economy. Pistor also concluded that in transplant countries the development of
corporate law either tends to be erratic or to decline altogether,38since transplanting countries
are not prepared to assume the changes inherent to the change in the law. Pistor found that legaltransplants cannot function in the host countries as they do in the home countries.39
Furthermore, related to legal transplants, Alan Watson40analyzed the basic factors that
may determine the failure or success of a legal transplant. These factors include among others the
problems that occur when transplanting legal concepts and the political and historical differences
34Id. p. 37.
35 K. Pistor et. al. Evolution of Corporate Law and the Transplant Effect: Lessons from Six Countries. TheWorld Bank Research Observer. Vol 18. No 1 (Spring 2003). Page 98.36
Id, Pistor et.al. Evolution of Corporate Law and the Transplant Effect: Lessons from Six Countries.Pag 9837
Pistor mentioned corporate law transplants from Spain in 1853 and from Chile in 1887. See Id.p. 41-42.38
Id. p. 59-60.39
Id, Pistor et.al. Evolution of Corporate Law and the Transplant Effect: Lessons from Six Countries.Pag 9940
F. Reyes Villamizar, Corporate Governance in Latin American. A Functional Analysis, Paul M. Hebert LawCenter; Louisiana State University. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1005208. See supra note 9.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
29/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 28
between the origin and the transplant countries. All of these factors must be considered in our
analysis of the effects of legal transplants in Colombia.
3. LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORY. THE KEYSTONE FOR LEGAL CHANGES?3.1. Analysis of the Legal Transplant TheoryThe Legal Transplant Theory proposed by Pistor, Berkowitz and Alan Watson, described in the
previous section, deserves some comments and observations. First, lawmakers in both, origin and
transplanting countries, shall undertake a comprehensive analysis about the socioeconomic
circumstances of the country prior the adoption of a legal change. Origin and transplanting
countries must follow an adaptation process to guaranty the successfulness of the modification. As
a result, unsuccessful legal changes can occur in either system, resulting from uninformed
decisions.
Since origin countries create the law under the basis of their own experience in a particular
moment, the effectiveness of legal changes is expected to be higher than in transplanting
countries, which merely replicate foreign models. However, although the successfulness of a legal
change is more feasible in an origin country than in transplanting countries, not all the legal
transplants are called to fail. The German and Brazilian experience of the Neuer Markt and Novo
Mercado (New Market), respectively, is illustrative of the previous affirmation. Neuer Markt and
Novo Mercado are considered as alternative new markets created within the established stock
exchange. Their similar characteristics allow us to conclude that Brazilian Novo Mecado is a legal
transplant from German Neuer Markt, despite no author has explicitly reached such conclusion.41
As a result, Germany is deemed to be the origin country, while Brazil shall be the transplanting
country in this case. In such circumstances, Neuer Markt is expected to be more effective and
successful than Novo Mercado, applying the general rule stated above. However, the Neuer Markt
41() To be sure, Brazils Novo Mercado and Costa Ricas Mercado Alternativo para Acciones appear to be
less modeled on AIM than on the now extinct German Neuer Markt. (See 3rd Board Listing: A viablealternative for SMEs looking for growth, Entrepreneurs Digest Association of Small and Medium Enterprises,
Singapore, available at http://www.asme.org.sg/).
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
30/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 29
was closed in the end of 2003 after losing nearly all of its value, in no more than six years of
existence. In contrast, Novo Mecado is almost the most successful stock exchange market in the
world.42
The previous example demonstrates how unsuccessful can be a legal change, in spite of being
adopted by an origin country, even if it theoretically corresponds with the specific socioeconomic
conditions of the country. On the contrary, the Novo Mercado proves that the legal change in the
transplant country can be even more effective, despite being imported. Indeed, Brazilian
lawmakers did not only reproduce the main characteristic of the German Neuer Markt, but also
adapted the legal change into Brazilian reality after an exhaustive examination of the economic,
social and legal needs.
Although the legal transplant theory suggest that legal changes in origin countries are
somehow infallible, several famous cases reveal the entirely opposite. For instance, it is hard to
explain under the legal transplant theory the financial crisis generated by Enron and Parmalat, in
the US and Italy, respectively. Indeed, it is irrelevant whether they where origin or transplant
countries regarding their financial systems at that moment. The truth is that American and Italian
corporate governance rules were insufficient to protect investors interests. For example, some
authors established that Enron scandal demonstrated that companys corporate governance
exhibited serious failures of monitoring, which can be traced back to conflicts of interest on the
part of board members and its auditors.43Particularly, the American crisis generated after Enrons
collapse proves that origin countries are not immune to unsuccessful legal changes. On the
contrary, failures in origin countries tend to have cross-border effects, since origin countries are
42 In 2007, Brazil was the third most active IPO market in the world, after China and the U.S., and was
responsiblefor 10% of the volume of such offerings worldwide.()The So Paulo Stock Exchange was hometo the largest IPO worldwide through the first three quartersof 2009, which, at approximately $8 billion, wasthe largest in its history. The Novo Mercados apparent success to date has not gone unnoticed by stock
exchanges in other developing countries. Major stock exchanges in India and the Philippines are drawing on
Brazils experiment as they design their own corporate governance listing standards (R. Gilson et. al.Regulatory Dualism as a Development Strategy: Corporate Reform in Brazil, the U.S., and the EU.Availableat: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1541226)43
S. Deakin and S. Konzelmann. Corporate Governance after Enron: An Age of Enlightenment. Available atthe book: After Enron. Improving Corporate Law and Modernising Securities Regulation in Europe and theUS.Pages 155156.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
31/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 30
usually the most developed in the global context.44Actually, some authors argue that Enron was
the prelude of the current market meltdown45.
Bear in mind that the legal transplant theory states that origin countries always adopt their
legal changes in an informed manner, regarding the particular socioeconomic circumstances of the
country. Under such statement, Pistor, Berkowitz and Alan Watson conclude that legal changes in
origin countries are deemed to be successful. If the theory is accurate, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
(SOX) shall comply with all these conditions. However, this is far from being the case. In the
second semester of 2001, some listed companies in the American markets collapsed. Nonetheless,
it is uncontested that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was adopted as a direct response to a specific
situation: the Enron crisis. Even if the SOX dealt with some of the legal loopholes, 46 those are
precisely the legal failures revealed by Enron. Additionally, the SOX was adopted in less than nine
months after Enrons bankruptcy which proves that the SOX was not the result of a conscientious
decision by the US Congress. This conclusion is reached by D. Skeel, summarized by J. McCahery
et. al.,
Skeels account is thus sympathetic to the widely-held view that Sarbanex-Oxley Act was
a knee-jerk response to populist pressure. It is doubtful whether this piece of legislation,
passed as quickly as it was, can have been adequately thought through.
47
Consequently, the Neuer Markt and Enron cases prove that legal changes in origin countries
can fail. It is not a matter of origin or transplanting countries.
Another relevant aspect of the Legal Transplant Theory is the similarity of the legal regimes
between origin and transplanting country. Pistor stated that legal transplants between members
44Origin countries are not necessarily developed economies. Instead, legal rules adopted by developing or
less developed countries can be transplanted into other systems. However, this is the exception, rather than
the general rule.45
R. Bryce, From Enron to the Financial Crisis, With Alan Greenspan in Between Today's disaster is a result oflessons not learned during the Enron mess. U.S. News & World Report. May 14th, 2010. 46
Mainly, the SOX adopted specific rules concerned auditors and protection of their independence; imposesstandards on the certification of annual and quarterly reports by CEO and other leading officers; introducesa definition of non-executive director independence, and so on.47
J. McCahery and J Armour. After Enron, Improving Corporate Law and Modernising Securities Regulationin Europe and the US. Hart PublishingOxford and Portland, Oregon. 2006. Page 4.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
32/60
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
33/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 32
realistic reasons, mainly the budget constraints. Indeed, an adversarial system requires huge
investments, in which a developing country as Colombia cannot incur at once. The adoption has to
be progressive and the rate of growing will not be the same as in a developed State. Nevertheless,
regardless of the transplant effects, the Colombian criminal law is more efficient and guarantor.
3.2. Analysis Undertook by Pistor and Berkowitz Regarding ColombiaHowever, the previous example is not the most important case in Colombian Law for the
purpose of this paper. Instead, it is necessary to refer to Pistors and Berkowitzs studies of
Colombian company law, mainly to the codes of commerce adopted in 1853 and 1887. Bear in
mind that Pistor issue its study in 2003, while Berkowitz did so in 1999. In spite of that, their study
about the Colombian case was based in laws that were issued approximately 157 years ago, and
which are no longer applicable, leading to an outdated and erroneous study.
Although it is true that Colombia transplanted its Code of Commerce in 1853 from Spain, its
decline cannot be adjudicated to the Legal Transplant Effect. To understand why this Code
failed, it is necessary to analyze the socioeconomic conditions of the country. Colombia was a
colonized country by the Spanish crown, and only 34 years after the independence the first Code
of Commerce was issued. For the Colombian reality of that moment it was clear that its legal
regime had to follow the steps of Spain, because they governed the country for more than 200
years. Colombia followed the legal system of its colonizer, as all the colonized countries made. For
instance, although in the present days the United States have an independent legal regime, in the
immediately years after their independence of England they pursued the British rules. The
adoption of the Code of Commerce in 1853 was neither an uninformed decision nor an
unnecessary decision, on the contrary, the socioeconomic conditions of the country claimed for a
Commercial regulation. It was a decision made by a country that did not have any independent
commercial practice at the moment. In consequence, neither a new law created in Colombia nor
the transplanted laws were called to success. Furthermore, it is not plausible to pretend that a
colonized country had to set up a commercial regulation from nothing, ignoring the tradition
learned from Spain.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
34/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 33
The failure of the second Colombian Code of Commerce, issued in 1887 based in Chilean legal
regime, was explained by Pistor as follows. The legal change occurred because lawmakers felt a
need to follow one of the most advanced legal systems in Latin America of the time, not because
there were particular domestic reasons for doing so.50This statement deserves several comments,
demonstrating that the further change of this Code of Commerce did not result from the Legal
Transplant effect either. Indeed, several socioeconomic circumstances determined the need for a
new regulation. As mentioned above, in 1886 Colombian ceased to be a federal state to become a
Unitary Republic. For that reason, the legislator analyzed the commercial circumstances of each
extinct State and after a comprehensive study of Colombian reality, adopted the regulation of one
of them (Panama), based on its great development and success, adding some former federal rules.
Consequently, Pistor fails in asserting that there were no particular domestic reasons for
adopting the legal change. Additionally, the Code of Commerce was not adopted merely because it
was based on the Chilean model. It is true that Panama (at the moment part of Colombia)
transplanted its commercial regulation from Chile. However, the early constituted Republic of
Colombia adopted the Panamanian Code of Commerce based on its great performance in that
State. It is plausible for the lawmaker to suppose that a successful regulation in one of its States
(Panama) would succeed in the rest of the country. Consequently, the lawmaker considered thatthe risk of failure were low, based on such experience.
Surprisingly, neither Pistor nor Berkowitz studied the current Code of Commerce, adopted in
1971, in spite of being a legal transplant from different countries, as mentioned above. It was a
Code adopted after a broad analysis of the socioeconomic conditions of the country, with the
objective to introduce Colombia in a globalized world. Prior its adoption, the most notable legal
experts in the country debated the content of the code. After their advise, the Colombian
Congress enacted the Code of Commerce, transplanting new rules from other advanced legalsystems and adjusting former Colombian norms to the new reality.
50Id, Pistor et.al. Evolution of Corporate Law and the Transplant Effect: Lessons from Six Countries.Pag 98
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
35/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 34
Nowadays, this Code regulated all the commercial transactions developed in the country,
including company law. Through the years, the legislator modified and complemented some rules
of it, in order to actualize its content to improve Colombian economy and make it an attractive
country for foreign investors. As a result, it could be concluded that the Colombian Code of
Commerce of 1971 is a successful legal transplant because it has been survived for 39 years, and it
is witness and one of the direct promoters of the positive evolution of the Colombian economy in
the last years.51
Bear in mind that the entire Colombian legal regime is a transplant especially from France,
Chile, Spain, and in the current years US. For instance, the Colombian Code Civil of 1887 is the
copy of the Chilean Code Civil, which in turn was adapted from Napo leons Code. In spite of the
decline and modification of some rules, it contains the founding rules of Colombian legal system.
However, under the Legal Transplant Theory, the Colombian legal regime is called to fail,
particularly regarding rules imported from common law countries. This assumption leads to the
conclusion that non-origin countries should come up with new legal rules, ignoring successful
developments obtained through the world.
Additionally, the adoption of further legal changes replacing current transplants is not a proof
of their failure. Law shall follow society, and therefore even origin countries are introducing
changes regarding the evolving socioeconomic circumstances. This is not to say that every legal
transplant is necessarily successful. Transplanting countries, such as Colombia, are full of examples
of imported legal changes whose outcome is contrasting. While some are real failures other prove
to be efficient in their implementation in the country. However, either outcome cannot be
explained under the legal transplant theory. The Congress is the main lawmaker in democratic
societies, and its political character is undeniable. Its decisions do not always met the social needs,
and sometimes its decisions are rather uninformed. Nevertheless, legal changes (transplantsincluded) can also be the result of coherent and informed decisions.
51 The BBCMundo.com on April 2007 classified Colombia the third Latin American country attractive for
private investment.
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
36/60
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
37/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 36
Wyoming as a response of the oil and gas enterprises needs, in order to adapt a legal entity that
allowed the entrepreneurs to keep the tax benefits with a limited liability regime. Nowadays,
every US State has a LLC statute.
From the creation of the Limited Liability Company until the present days, it is the most
attractive business form for small entrepreneurs, and every year increase the percentage of
companies that are constituted under this type of business form. Quite the opposite occurs with
Limited Partnerships that, in comparison with the LLC, their constitution do not have substantial
variations per year. Limited Partnerships became unattractive for the entrepreneurs since it is
require, for its constitution, at least one general partner that always assumes personal liability for
the debts of the company, condition that ends to be the biggest drawback of this form.
Furthermore, although the limited partners have limited liability, the role that they have on the
running of the company is also limited and if they exceed their limits, they have the risk to lose the
limited liability benefits, which also constitute a disadvantage. The following graphic
demonstrated the successful of the Limited Liability Company in the last few years while the
Limited Partnership does not have further progress.
FIGURE 5. Limited Partnership Vs Limited Liability Company
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
LP
LLC
Mariana Acua2010
Source: Internal Revenue Service United States Department of the Treasury
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
38/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 37
1.1. Characteristics of the Limited Liability Company
Firstly, it is important to establish that although the US Federal Legislator promulgated the
Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, each State has its proper legislation, based in the above
mentioned act, to regulate the Limited Liability Companies. However, those regulations are default
rules, which only apply in the events that are not expressly regulated by parties in the LLC
operating agreement, and they can be modify by the LLCs members.
Limited Liability Companies are consider as entities separated from their members, and can be
formed for any purpose necessary for the development of their activities. The only requirement is
that the purpose has to be lawful. The LLC has to be constituted trough articles of organization53
,
and the members could created an operating agreement54, in which they decide how the company
is going to be governed, that is, under which legal regime the company is going to perform.55
Moreover, for the formation and development of the LLCs, it is necessary to fulfill some
formalities, such as maintaining a registered office and keeping certain records, as well as,
including in the name of the company specific words, such as LLC or Limited Liability Company,
that allow third parties to know the owners of the company are protected with limited liability.
Furthermore, most States require that the operating agreement establishes the LLCs existence
period (usually 30 years). In the absence of such clause the LLC will cease to exist in the event of
53The articles of organization are comparable to the corporate articles of incorporation. They are the basic
organizational document of the LLC. This document is obligatory for the formation of an LLC, is consider asthe certificate of formation. Articles of organization are filed with the secretary of the State where the LLC isto be created, and only after they are filed the limited liability protection come into effect.54
The operating agreement is a contract between the members of the LLC related to the operation andgovernance of the LLC. In this agreement can be found who the members of the LLC are and what theirinterest in the capital of the LLC is. This contract is also useful for the members of the LLC to modify the
statutory default rules that might otherwise apply to the company.55
Most Statutes, known as flexible Statutes, permit members (who are owners) of an LLC to enter into anyagreement they desire to govern internal relationship within the LLC; they are only limited by broad public
policy restrictions () In other words, you can agree in the contract between the members (the operating
agreement which is analogous to a shareholders agreement for corporate shareholders or a partnership
agreement in the partnership context) to almost anything you wish. If, however, you dont agree as to a
specific matter then the rules of the State law where the LLC is formed will apply. (M. Shenkman et. al.
Starting a Limited Liability Company. Second Edition. United States of America, 2003. Page 5).
-
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
39/60
IBL MARIANA ACUA GONZLEZ
Page 38
the death, retirement, withdrawal or bankruptcy of a member. However, in the present of any of
those events, the members could decide to continue the LLC's existence at a later date.
Most States allow the LLC to be set up by one person (single member) and there is not any
maximum number of membersrequirement. In this respect, members are considered as persons
who have the right to vote on the LLC matters, the right to obtain information from the LLC and
the right to act as an agent of the company (non-economic rights), as well asthey have the right
to allocate LLC profits and losses, and the right to receive distribution of the LLC assets (LLC
interest - economic right)).56 The member interest could be transferable only if there is
unanimous consent, unless the operating agreement provides different regulation in this respect.
All the restricting transferability rules can be changed by the owner of the LLC. Moreover, the
members could delegate the management of the company in third persons. Nonetheless, if they
do not make it expressly in the operating agreement, the default rule provides that the LLC shall
be managed by its members. The fact that the members are managers of the LLC does not mean
that they lose the limited liability protection.
On the other hand, the LLC provides flexibility in the way the members structure the voting
rights and the decision-making processes. Normally, the financial rights and control of the
company through voting rights are given according to members contributions to the company.
The contributions could be made in many forms, including cash, property, services, promises to
provide those things, or debt guarantees. Additionally, one of the benefits of a limited liability
company is that there is no minimum amount of contributions. In fact, the members do not have
any obligations to make contributions.
As previously explained, the most attractive quality of the LLC is the assignation of limited
liability to all its members. However, the limited liability does not imply owners are always fully
protected from personal liabilities. Courts canpierce the corporate veil of LLCs when some type of
fraud or misrepresentation is involved. Furthermore, the members are personally liable for the
collection and payment of employment taxes, as well as for failure to submit withheld taxes.
56J. Cunningham. Drafting Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. Aspaen Publishers Inc., 2004.
Page 3-14.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_the_corporate_veilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_the_corporate_veil -
8/12/2019 ACUA GONZLEZ, Mariana, Current and Prospective Colombian Company Law Under the Legal Transplant Theor
40/60
CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE COLOMBIAN COMPANY LAW UNDER THE LEGAL TRANSPLANT THEORYSociedad por Acciones Simplificadas (S.A.S.) Case
IBL
Page 39
Additionally, it is possible to transform a Corporation, Partnership or a Limited Partnership in a
Limited Liability Company. Nevertheless, the debts or the obligations that the corporation, the
partnership or the limited partnership had acquired automatically became debts of the LLC.
Finally, in the operating agreement the LLC members should established the taxation regime
that is imposed to the company. However, the default rules determine that the LLC itself does not
ordinarily pay taxes on its own behalf as a separate entity. The income of the Limited Liability
Company passes through to its members, who report the income on their personal tax returns.
2. SOCIT PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIES (S.A.S): THE FRENCH BUSINESS FORMSocit par actions simplifie (S.A.S.)was introduced by Law 91-1 of 3 January 1994. It was
created under the idea to give the founder of the company more flexibility setting its basic rules.
It is considered as the first hybrid business form adopted under the French Law. It is modeled by
the Common Law Principles, which means that have similar characteristics to the US Limited
Liability Company and the UK Limited Company. Nowadays, Socit par actions simplifie (S.A.S.)is
increasingly used, especially by small and mid-size businesses. Furthermore, the SAS are clearly
favored by foreign groups which are setting up subsidiaries in France.
2.1. Characteristics of the Socit par Actions Simplifies (S.A.S)The organization of the