Activity Provider Risk Assessment · Equipment is suitable for the activity, properly maintained...

Activity Provider Risk Assessment

Drive D/Documents/It’s Rocket Science Adventures/Admin/Forms Reviewed April 2017

RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

Activity Description

Destination of activity

Date Time

Proposed duration of activity

Number of Participants Children Supervising Staff Parents Volunteers

Incursion Coordinator Cran Middlecoat

Mobile 0416 046 917

Email [email protected]

Hazards or risks associated with water-based activities? If yes, must be listed below.

Activity Checklist – items to be available during the activity

First Aid Kit List of adults participating in the incursion

Contact information for Event Coordinator Mobile phone / other means of communicating with the event coordinator and emergency services

Other items, please list



ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

It’s Rocket Science Adventures emphasis’ that science can be better understood through its practice, and offer school age students across Queensland the rare opportunity to explore the science behind rockets, flight and space. Our fully interactive project based workshops are Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM) focused, and directly aligned with the Australian Curriculum (ACARA). The workshops are of a duration of 90 minutes, with some additional time required to set up and pack up equipment. A water or toilet break may be appropriate prior to field launches. Workshops commence in a multipurpose room or undercover area. Participants are going to construct a simple bottle rocket from recycled items, which can be filled with water and compressed air and launched into the air under the guidance of the facilitator. During this time participants can explore large scaled model rockets and Chinese fire arrows constructed of Styrofoam, and introduced to rocket science concepts ie action and reaction forces, stability, and propulsion. ALL participants will then complete safety procedures and be directed in the safe handling of equipment from the incursion facilitators prior to launching rockets.

Part Two involves the rocket launch field experiments. Participants conduct experiments not just observe a demonstration, to apply the scientific philosophy of predict, observe and evaluate in the performance of their individual rocket. Participants will test their rockets to see who can launch it the highest (outdoors) or achieve the greatest distance (both indoors and outdoors) by aiming at various ‘planets’. The outdoor rocket launches require access to a water hose or tap to fill bottles and an outdoor open space (ie open park or school oval size). Safe position of activity is considered in relation to buildings, vehicles, other activities or personnel. Sunsafe strategies by instructing all participants to wear hats will be implemented. If weather or environmental conditions are assessed as unsafe, indoor rocket launches will require access to indoor or under cover area with high ceilings approximately 15 x 5 metres (ie basketball court size area). The recycled plastic soda bottles will be filled with a percentage of pressurised air and water throughout the outdoor workshop. Each launch team (maximum of five per session) with be supervised by a responsible adult such as incursion facilitator to manage the activity safely. Provisions for individuals with medical, behavioural or learning needs who require special considerations will be assessed by the facilitator prior to the incursion taking place to secure the additional supervising adults that may be required. The activity host authorised representative has overall responsibility for the activity. All care is taken, however we do not take responsibility and will not accept liability for injuries caused by misuse of our equipment. Equipment is suitable for the activity, properly maintained and will be appropriately used. It’s Rocket Science Adventures facilitators have the knowledge and skills to plan, induct, instruct and manage the activity safely for all participants. The facilitators are qualified in the fields of aviation, aeronautics, science and communications. Blue card compliance and certificate of currency will be provided. First aid and emergency medical treatment provisions will be made available by the event host if required.



Risk / Hazard (What could happen and How would

it happen)

Like

liho

od

Co

nse

qu

ence

s

Ris

k R

atin

g

Risk Control / Prevention Measures

(What are you going to do to prevent or reduce the risk)

Responsible

Other/s

Revised

risk factor

Participants may be at risk of falling large model rocket display or pull up banner stands set up at the front of the room or event stand. P

oss

ible

Min

or

Med

ium

• Workshop props (model rockets) will be displayed on a table at the front of the room and in close proximity to a wall.

• The exhibition banner stand will be situated away from room traffic areas close to the wall at the front of the room.

• At an event, all props will be displayed on a table at the rear of the tent.

• The model rockets have been made of light weight Styrofoam to ensure minimal harm if it impacts a person.

Workshop facilitators,

supervising adults

LOW

All participants will be exposed to fast moving objects (rockets in flight) and may be hit by falling rockets.

Like

ly

Min

or

Med

ium

• Instruction in safety procedures will be conducted by facilitators.

• All participants will be required to fully understand and comply with safety procedures prior to field experiments.

• All participants will be told NOT to attempt to catch a falling rocket.

• One supervising adult positioned at each launch site.

• All rocket field experiments will be conducted in a large open place (school oval or large open undercover area), away from other buildings, vehicles or people.

• Rocket launch angles directed away from participants.

• Participants will be located behind a designated safety line.

• ‘Rockets’ are made of recycled plastic soda bottles, thus mass of the falling object is minimal.

• The event booking authorised representative has overall responsibility for the activity.


supervising adults

MEDIUM



Risk / Hazard

(What could happen and How would it happen)

Like

liho

od

Co

nse

qu

ence

s

Ris

k R

atin

g



Responsible

Other/s

Revised

risk factor

All participants will be exposed to pressurised plastic soda bottles used during rocket launch experiments.

Alm

ost

cer

tain

Min

or

Med

ium

• It’s Rocket Science Adventures have conducted significant research into the rupture pressure levels of plastic soda bottles.

• These pressures range from 120psi up to 180psi.

• Launching apparatus supplied by It’s Rocket Science have built in pressure relief valves set to 80psi.

• At events with a limited or small open space, rocket launches will have pressure relief valves reduced to 30psi.

• During It’s Rocket Science rupture research the most significant outcome noted was participants became wet. The PET plastic soda bottles do not splinter.

• Construction of bottle rockets at ALL events will be made with fizzy drink bottles as these are pressure rated.

• Construction will NOT be from fizzy bottles with faded labels, as this may indicate sun damage and the bottles are likely to rupture at a lower pressure.


supervising adults

LOW

During the indoor rocket launches participants will be located in an indoor or undercover area and will have restricted space for rocket field experiments.

Like

ly

Min

or

Med

ium

• Instruction in safety procedures will be conducted by facilitators.

• All participants will be required to fully understand and comply with safety procedures prior to field experiments.

• One supervising adult positioned at each launch site.

• Rocket launch angles directed away from participants.

• Participants will be located behind a designated safety line.

• At events with a limited or small open space, rocket launch apparatus will have pressure relief valves reduced to 30psi.


supervising adults

LOW



Risk / Hazard (What could happen and How would

it happen)

Like

liho

od

Co

nse

qu

ence

s

Ris

k R

atin

g



Responsible

Other/s

Revised

risk factor

During the outdoor rocket launches participants will be exposed to the sun.

Alm

ost

C

erta

in

Min

or

Med

ium

• All participants will be required to comply with our Sun Safety Policy.

• All participants will be instructed to wear a sun hat during field experiments.


supervising adults

LOW

Participants may get clothing or body parts wet whilst using water to fill plastic soda bottles during rocket field experiments.

Po

ssib

le

Insi

gnif

ican

t

Low

• Clean tap water will be used to fill plastic soda bottles for storage of water to be taken to the outdoor launches.

• Safety instructions will be given by workshop facilitators to use water for filling plastic bottles only.

• Participants who are observed to pose a risk to others will be directed to the event booking authorised representative who has overall responsibility for the activity.


supervising adults

LOW

Participants may be exposed to some minor noise as the pressurised rockets are launched.

Alm

ost

cer

tain

Insi

gnif

ican

t

Med

ium

• All participants will be encouraged to cover their ears with their hands if they feel they may experience discomfort.

• All participants will be standing away from the launch site to minimise noise discomfort and other potential harm.


supervising adults

LOW

Participants with behavioural needs, medical conditions or special needs participating in the incursion may require special considerations. P

oss

ible

Min

or

Med

ium

• A registered teacher has overall responsibility for the activity.

• Prior to the workshop the parents/guardian may provide the workshop facilitator with helpful guidance to ensure overall participation and satisfaction with the workshop.

• Additional supervising adults may be required to assist with individual participants as directed by the facilitator as needed.

Workshop facilitators, class teacher, teacher

aids, parent helpers

LOW



RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX

Consequence

Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic

Likelihood 1 2 3 4 5

Almost certain 5

Medium

High

High

Extreme

Extreme

Likely

4

Medium

Medium

High

High

Extreme

Possible

3

Low

Medium

Medium

High

Extreme

Unlikely

2

Low

Low

Medium

High

High

Rare

1

Low

Low

Medium

Medium

High

RISK LIKELIHOOD

Rating Scale Criteria

1 Rare • Remote chance of risk event and even then in highly exceptional circumstances,

• 1 in 10,000

2 Unlikely • Risk event unlikely to occur but change of circumstances or situation may create

opportunity for risk to arise

• 1 in 1,000

3 Possible • Foreseeable that risk event may occur, but is not expected to occur

• 1 in 500

4 Likely • Risk event likely to occur at least once

• 1 in 100

5 Almost Certain • Expect frequent occurrences

• 1 in 10



RISK CONSEQUENCE

Rating Description Remarks 1 Insignificant • No injuries

• No disruption to the incursion • No environmental or other damage • Minimal financial risk or loss ( 1% of budget)

2 Minor • Small number of injuries • Only first aid required • Limited disruption to incursion • Some environmental or other property damage • Some financial risk or loss (2.5% of budget)

3 Moderate • Ambulance / Hospital treatment required • Some community inconvenience • Some activities unable to proceed • Some environmental damage (minor long term effect) • Other property damage • Significant financial risk or loss (5% of budget)

4 Major • Extensive injuries • Significant hospitalisation • Some community displacement • Extensive environmental damage (long term effect) • Other extensive property damage • Serious financial risk or loss (10% of budget)

5 Critical • Fatalities • Injuries and extended hospitalisation periods • Widespread community displacement • Extensive and widespread property damage • Significant short or long term environmental damage • Extreme financial risk or loss (25% of budget)



INHERENT RISK LEVEL

Low Little change of incident or injury

Medium Some chance of an incident and injury requiring first aid

High Likely chance of a significant incident and injury requiring medical treatment

Extreme High chance of a serious incident resulting in highly debilitating injury

Approval (only required for high or extreme risk activities)

Approval as submitted

Approved with the following conditions:

Not approved for the following reasons:

**FOR DEMONSTRATION FLIGHTS: By Signing below, you certify that you have read, understand and agree to a demonstration water rocket flight knowingly and voluntarily. Furthermore, you confirm that as an Authorised Representative, It’s Rocket Science Adventures willingly satisfied and complied with all visitor requirements, and permission to enter school grounds to provide said demonstration is lawfully granted.

Workshop Facilitator

Signed

Date

Authorised Representative

Signed

Date

Work Team: Daniel Pollard

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): N/A

Activity Hazards in carrying out this step Risk (Harm) Existing risk controls/risk controls to be implemented Additional risk controls required

Ensure you number each step. List major steps or task in activity egManual handlingBiological substancesChemical handlingEnvironmentalStudent behaviour during activity

For example:Injury from lifting/crushing/pinchingContaminations/infectionSafe handling of chemicalsWeather - hot conditions - dehydration/slippery or wet surfaces - slip/trip/fallHigh risk behaviour/lack of supervision/medical conditions

For example: physical injury cut/graze chemical burnSkin irritation/eye irritation/aspiration issuesSymptoms/result from medical condition e.g. asthma attack

List all current treatments that are already in place and will be used to undertake the task for example: identify location, existing safety measures, existing emergency proceduresidentify and keep hands/fingers/feet clear of potential hazardslist of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)area free of obstacleswater available/shade availableestablish safety zones/areasteachers to supervise own students/responsible for knowledge of student medical conditions and administer aid where needed

Co

nse

que

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Additional treatments may be required to reduce risk rating. Remember the risk treatment options (hierarchy of control)EliminationSubstituteIsolationEngineeringAdministrationPPE C

on

seq

uen

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Coding / Handling Improper use of USB cables. Students use materials toinjure themselves oranother personintentionally orunintentionally.

Building Block Studio incursions are supervised byBuilding Block Studio staff. Participating teachers mustalso supervise their students for the duration of theworkshop. Building Block Studio staff are aware ofprocedures to ensure safe play and behaviour during an incursion and provide students instructions on how to use the provided material in a safe matter. The lowvoltage (5V) USB cable will not cause serious injury to the student.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Rar

e

Lo

w

Short USB cables (15cm) are used

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Rar

e

Lo

w

Coding / Handling Accidental ingestion of materials.

Child swallows or ingestsmaterials used in incursion.

Building Block Studio workshops and incursions aresupervised by Building Block Studio staff for the duration of the workshops. Participating teacher’s must also supervise their students for the duration of the workshop. The devices used are large enough that full ingestion would be extremely difficult.Building Block Studio staff are aware of procedures toensure safe play and behaviour during the workshop.

Mo

de

rate

Ra

re

Lo

w

Coding / Handling Bodily harm caused by contact with materials.

Child scratchesthemselves, pokes eyeswith materials or standson materials.

Building Block Studio workshops and incursions aresupervised by Building Block Studio staff for the duration of the workshops. Participating teacher’s must also supervise their students for the duration of the workshop. Building Block Studio workshops involve materials that are clean and safe to use.Building Block Studio staff are aware of procedures toensure safe play and behaviour during the workshop.Building Block Studio staff instructs students how to use materials in a safe manner.

Lo

w

Ra

re

Lo

w

Student Privacy Unauthorised photography. Photography is a risk forchildren whose identitiesare protected.

Written permission is sought by the Building Block Studio from parents or guardians before any photography is conducted.Strict guidelines are in place for use of photographs inBuilding Block Studio’s promotional publications such as Facebook

Mo

de

rate

Rar

e

Lo

w

Review date for risk assessment: _______13 August 2019 and 14 August 2019 (onsite)__________________

Risk rating

Risk rating

WHS Risk Assessment Date of assessment: 14/07/2019 Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment: BBC Microbit Coding during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019

Location where task/activity is being conducted: __Maryborough West State School & Bauple State School_______________________________________

Assessment completed by (team members): Daniel Pollard

Work Team: _Karen Hofman; Maria Bavins______________

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): __[list and attach any supporting paperwork/material safety data sheets (MDS) etc if required]______________________






Co

nse

que

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

uen

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Set Up and Pack Up - Slips, trips and falls - Pinch points / caught between crush pointsStrains and sprains from manual handling exertion Incorrect set up of equipment

Physical injury eg twisted ankle, grazes, injured back.

1. One person in charge at set-up2. Proper lifting techniques3. Briefing volunteers4. Work with caution

Min

or

Unl

ike

ly

5

Closely supervise all workers

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Temporary Structures e.g. table Table collapseTrip hazardsObstruction of walkways exits / or emergency access

Injury to feet or other body parts caught in table collapse.

1. Good setup according to equipment instructions2. Secure items

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Closely supervise all workers; double check instructions prior to set up.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Workshops - electricity use for workshop

Loss of electrical power Interuption to conducting workshop; participants (students) become restless

Pre-Event1. Ensure all electrical equipment is tested and tagged and fit for purpose.2. Specific electrical requirements discussed with QM Facilities and QM Exhibitions.During event1. Follow Event Emergency Management Procedures for Power Failure Incident:- Follow venue procedures and VSO instructions- Assess for possible hazards- Venue to make announcements to the public- Power failure incidents to be reported to the Organisers as soon as practicable. Incident report completed and submitted to Organisers within 2 hours.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Natural light into the space will still allow activities to all proceed without significant interupton.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Volunteer and Staff (worker) wellness Exhaustion, DehydrationStress, Long standing

Fainting, unable to continue work.

1. Pre-plan breaks2. Water bottles3. Work Schedule

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Ensure breaks are taken, check in with each other to check well-being.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Emergency Situation Person/s posing security risk to patrons, fire emergency, unforeseen emergency

Panic, injury to participants

1. Organisers to monitor who enters the venue.2. Report situation to venue / event organiser - who contacts OS1 Security and/or emergency services.3. Venue/Security takes carriage of situation and response.4. Follow procedures in Event Emergency Management Plan.5. Serious incidents or emergencies to be reported to the Organisers as soon as practicable. Incident report completed and submitted to Organisers within 2 hours.

Min

or

Po

ssib

le

5

Review site procedures prior to event commencing.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Use of VR equipment during workshop

Damage to or theft of object/s or equipment

Damage / loss of equipment

Pre-event1. Ensure external parties hold insurance for object to be displayed or used in activities/presentations.During event2. Correct manual handling techniques during bump-in including correct lifting techniques and use of trolleys and other aids where required.3. Equipment and objects to locked in secure location when not in use.4. OS1 Security on-call during event hours.5. Report serious theft/vandalism to the Organisers as soon as practicable.

Min

or

Unl

ike

ly

5

Inventory of equpment during and following each session.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2

Student behaviour during workshop

Student behvaiour causing a disruption to the delivery of the workshop

Disruption of workhop delivery; injury to another student if there is physical behaviour

Prior to commencement of each session consult with lead teacher to identify any potentially disruptive students; Discuss approach should students require more individualised attention; enlist assistance fro accompaying teachers.

Min

or

Pos

sib

le

4

Apply micro-management echniques during workshop eg standing near students who are disruptive to encourage them to behave; ask those students to be assistants to keep them busy.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly

2


Risk rating

Risk rating

WHS Risk Assessment Date of assessment:__16/7/19______________ Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment:__CoralWatch Virtual Reality Experience during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019_____________________

Location where task/activity is being conducted: ___Brolga Theatre _________________________________________

Assessment completed by: ______Karen Hofman_______________________________________________

Task / Activity Risk Assessment – OHS Unit – Dec 2014

Occupational Health & Safety Unit

Task / Activity Risk Assessment

Summary

Date Conducted: August 13th, 2019

Risk assessment number:

Name of task / activity: Maryborough Science Week, 2019: Drones

Brief summary:

Workshops for Year 10 and 11 special education students

Location: Aldridge State High School Hall

School / Directorate: CQUniversity Education and the Arts

Campus:

Review Date: (12 months from date conducted) August 13th, 2020

Legislation

Primary legislation: Work Health and Safety Act 2011

Secondary legislation: Work Health and Safety Regulations 2011

Other references:

PPE required: Safety glasses when using drones

Generic Plant Risk Assessments

CQU Risk Database

Risk Assessment Procedure


Personnel

Team Leader: Dr Wendy Fasso

Team members:

Dr Michelle Vanderburg, Ms Regina John Luan

Student volunteers, and four teachers from Maryborough Special School.

Supervisor / Manager: Professor Denise Wood

Laboratory Technician: N/A

Dean / Deputy Dean / Director: Professor Denise Wood

PVC / DVC or AVC (if required)

Risk Assessment Matrix

LIKELIHOOD

(L)

CONSEQUENCE (C)

Insignificant

1

Minor

2

Moderate

3

Major

4

Extreme

5

Almost certain

5

Moderate

5

High

10

High

15

Extreme

20

Extreme

25

Likely

4

Moderate

4

Moderate

8

High

12

High

16

Extreme

20

Possible

3

Low

3

Moderate

6

Moderate

9

High

12

High

15

Unlikely

2

Low

2

Low

4

Moderate

6

Moderate

8

High

10

Rare

1

Low

1

Low

2

Low

3

Moderate

4

Moderate

5

LIKELIHOOD (L)

Almost certain Is expected to occur in most circumstances

Likely Will probably occur in most circumstances

Possible Might occur at some time

Unlikely Could occur at some time

Rare May occur only in exceptional circumstances


CONSEQUENCE (C)

Extreme Incident causing death/s

Major Incident causing disability or longer term hospitalisation

Moderate Incident requiring hospital treatment

Minor Incident requiring medical treatment

Insignificant Incident requiring first aid only

Hierarchy of Control

In consultation with stakeholders, determine ways to eliminate risks (Level 1 controls) so far as is reasonably practicable. If that is not possible, determine ways to minimising risks (Level 2 & 3 controls) so far as is reasonably practicable by referring to the Hierarchy of Control shown below;


List steps in task / activity Identified Hazards Associated Risks

Initial Risk Score

Control measures

Residual Risk Score Controls in

place (Y / N) L C Score L C Score

1. Inside 1.1 moving around in the building /furnished room

Could result in minor injuries such as slips, trips, falls or cuts.

3

3

MOD 9

Hall furniture to be moved to the perimeter of the room.

1

3

LOW 3

Y

2.

3. Drones 3.1 flying drones could hit someone

Damage to face, head, eyes. 3

4

High 12

All Drones used have propeller guards. Also, safety rules provided at the start of the event including rules. All students supervised by adults in a ratio 3 adults: 4 students. Event area to be partitioned into testing and flying zones. All participants and staff to wear safety glasses while drones are flying. Drones are not to be handled by students or staff when operating.

1

4

MOD 4

Y

4. Drones Students could collide with each other

Physical damage and falls 3 4 High 12 Protocols will be established to avoid students moving around while drones are in the air. Drone test areas to be supervised and taped out. Protocols for flying will be established, with students advised to watch the drone at all times rather than the control pad. Drones to be flown under direct adult supervision at all times.

3 3 Low 3 Y

Drones Student Behaviours Students are potentially unpredictable in terms of

behaviours

3 4 High staff to student ratio. Teachers from the special school who are familiar with all students and have strong relationships with them will

3 3 Low 3

Y


List steps in task / activity Identified Hazards Associated Risks

Initial Risk Score

Control measures

Residual Risk Score Controls in

place (Y / N) L C Score L C Score

directly supervise. CQUniversity staff who are experienced in working with students with special needs are in attendance. A withdrawal plan is planned for students who require withdrawal to a safe space. The school has its own risk assessment and management plan in place for the activity.


What needs to be done By who Date

completed Comments

Approval & Signoff

Team Leader

Name: Wendy Fasso

July 22nd, 2019

Other Team Members

Name: Signature: Date:

Supervisor / Manager


Laboratory Technician


Dean / Deputy Dean / Director


DVC / PVC / AVC (if required)


Risk Treatment Plan

S/N Activity Hazard PossibleAccident/Illhealthtopersons,fireorpropertyloss

Severity Likelihood Riskvalue RiskControlMeasures

Severity Likelihood Riskvalue

1 Droneflying Droneshittingpeoplewhenairborne

Minorskincuts 2 3 6 Dronesselectedaresmallinsizewithlimitedrisktopeople.Limitthedistancetopeopleandprovidetrainedteachersupervisionatalltime.OnlyflyoneDroneatatime.

2 1 2

2 Droneflying Propellersfallingoffin-flightcausinginjury

Damagetoeyes 4 2 8 EyeprotectiontobewornwhenevertheDronesareoperated.

4 1 4

3 Droneflying Propellersfallingoffin-flightcausinginjury

Bodyinjury 1 2 3 ThesizeoftheDronepropellersaresmallenoughtobeharmlessifhittingapersononthebody.

2 1 2

4 Droneflying Dronefailure Collisionwithpeopleorobjects 2 2 4 MakesurethattheDronesareinanoperativestateandbatteriesarefullychargedpriortoflying.

2 1 2

5 Dronecharging Electricalwiresdamaged

Electrocution 5 2 10 Inspect240Vchargingcordsfordamage.Keepelectricalcabletaggingup-to-date

5 1 5

HazardIdentification RiskEvaluation RiskControl

RISKASSESSMENT

DocID:RiskAssessment-IndoorDroneCoding

Date:18thJanuary2018

Project:DronecodingParrotMicro-Dronesforindoorflying

ApprovedBy:MichaelHolmstrom

Students will play a board game, design their own version using computers, and then cut out the cards and boards of their own versions

Work Team: _Ariel Marcy and Caitlin Syme______________

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): __N/A______________________






Co

nse

que

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

uen

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

1) Play board game indoors Very small chance of paper cut

Cut/graze Instructors to supervise, first aid kit on hand

insi

gn

ifica

nt

Rar

e

1

N/a2) Use computers None None Instructors to supervise, first aid kit on hand

insi

gn

ifica

nt

Rar

e 1

N/a3) Cut out custom board games: print out games on thick paper, cut out components with scissors (instructor with experience will use a scalpel to cut out games more quickly, but no students will be using this tool)

Small chance of paper cut / misuse of scissors

cut/graze Instructors to supervise, first aid kit on hand

insi

gn

ifica

nt

Unl

ike

ly 2

N/a

WHS Risk Assessment Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Assessment completed by (team members): ______Ariel Marcy________________________________________________

Review date for risk assessment: _______13 August 2019 and 14 August 2019 (onsite)__________________ (specify date)

Risk rating

Risk rating

Date of assessment:__15 July 2019_______________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment:__DIY Go Extinct! during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019:

Location where task/activity is being conducted: ___Tinana State School (13 Aug), Riverside, Aldridge (14 Aug)_________________________________________

Work Team: _Adam Jacobs, Andrew Brodie, Ian Kotze, Fiona Reilly, Angus Wood, Georgia Brnada, Hannah Dalton, Jarryd Stringfellow, Maxime Steuhrenberg, Corey Robinson, Angelica Nicholas, Bhagyashree Shelke ______________

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): __Certificate of Insurance, Work Cover Certificate______________________






Co

nse

que

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

uen

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Arrival at venue and setup Tripping over power cables Physical injury Cloth tape is used to tape down cords to the ground and eliminate tripping hazards

Min

or

Un

likel

y

Lo

w

NA

NA

NA

NA

Arrival at venue and setup Electrocution from power cables Physical injury All power cords tagged and tested as of June 2019

Min

or

Un

likel

y

Lo

w

NA

NA

NA

NA

Arrival at venue and setup Injury due to lifting multiple laptops Physical injury Laptops transported in Pelican box that can be rolled on wheels. Additionally, trolleys are used to transport other heavy equipment M

ino

r

Ra

re

Lo

w

NA

NA

NA

NA

Delivery of program Cyber security - ensuring that students are not accessing inappropriate websites

Child Safety Junior Engineers delivers programs with a 1:9 instructor to student ratio meaning that all children will be thoroughly supervised. In the event they visit a website that they shouldn't, instructors have been trained to identify this, ensure that the website is closed and that the student returns to the coding platform. Additionally, many of the programs are being delivered at school, using their hardware. School firewalls are in place to ensure that the risk of accessing inappropriate sites are mitigated. Lastly, all of Junior Engineers' laptops have website safeguards and firewalls built into them as well.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Ra

re

Lo

w

NA

NA

NA

NA

Delivery of program Student data housing Student personal information shared online

Junior Engineers creates accounts prior to the workshops using complete anonymity for each user. A key value to using Junior Engineers' online coding platform is that no personal information is required to create accounts i.e. student profiles are created as student 1, student 2, student 3 etc. In

sig

nifi

can

t

Ra

re

Lo

wNA

NA

NA

NA

Delivery of Program Student safety Physical Injury 1. All Junior Engineers instructors are either qualified and registered teachers or hold current blue cards, meaning that every instructor has been approved to work with children as part of a recent police check. 2. Junior Engineers delivers 75 classes a week to school children and have stringent child safety policies in place e.g. no instructor is ever to be alone with a student, no instructor ever uses the same bathrooms as students etc. 3. All instructors undergo regular professional development where Duty of Care obligations are constantly reinforced 4. Junior Engineers has a first aid escalation process and all instructors are trained in following this process, should the need for first aid arise

Mo

dera

te

Ra

re

Lo

w

NA

NA

NA

NA

Students leaving the program Tripping and duty of care Physical Injury and No Supervision

1. All cords will be taped to the ground to eliminate tripping hazards. 2. Junior Engineers instructors are trained to be mindful of Duty of Care where no child will be left unsupervised. Despite the program being delivered in school, Junior Engineers will still employ the most stringent policies around Duty of Care

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Ra

re

Lo

w

NA

NA

NA

NA


Risk rating with

Risk rating with

WHS Risk Assessment Date of assessment:__4/07/2019______________ Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment:__90 minute workshops in the text based coding language of coffee script during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019_____________________

Location where task/activity is being conducted: ___Various locations in local Maryborough _________________________________________

Assessment completed by (team members): ______Andrew Brodie________________________________________________

Work Team: _[Michael Mills]______________

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): __N/A






Co

nse

que

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

uen

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Audience participation Injury from overexertion Strained muscle Movement asked at appropriate level to audience skill level, and with advice from teachers who know the students.

3 1 4

N/APerformer Singing and dancing Injury from overexertion Strained muscle As a skilled performer, am highly trained in in appropriate

execution of movements on stage, and with level of fitness to ensure such possibilities are extremely unlikely.

3 1 4

N/APerformer Singing and dancing Fall from stage Sprain. Break. On stage rehearsal and appropriate marking

of space with appropriate boundaries.

6 1 7

N/AAdditional note In more than 20 years of

performing, Michael Mills has never sustained an injury during any performance. In that same period, and in performing to hundreds of thousands of people, no audience member has sustained an injury in any performance or workshop, and no claim for public liability has ever been made.


Risk rating with

Risk rating with

WHS Risk Assessment Date of assessment:__[10th July 2019]_______________ Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment:__[Science Based Musical Theatre] during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019_____________________

Location where task/activity is being conducted: ___[Brolga Theatre Auditorium]_________________________________________

Assessment completed by (team members): ______[Michael Mills]________________________________________________

Work Team: _Desley Pidgeon, Alana Sinnamon and 4 CQU students_____________

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): __[list and attach any supporting paperwork/material safety data sheets (MDS) etc if required]______________________






Co

nse

qu

en

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

ue

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Colour changing carnations

* flowes placed in cloured water

split wter physical injury Supervised and pre- done by team 1

<10 2

materials to mop up and spills

1

<10 2

Hover craftsprepartaion of material ( glue bottle top to CD)

Super glue errorspossbile cut form broken CD

physical injury Pre-pard by team 2

10

to 3

0 2

Use of gloves

2

10

to 3

0

2

ralease of hovercraft injuy from being hit by hover craft

physical injury ensure safe distance for all participants 2

10

to 3

0 2

Have additional student teachers monitor the students

2

10

to 3

0

2

Lava Lamps

adding the alka-selzer tablet

not capping the bottle in time could result in water spliage could have a splip image

physical injury all participants having saftey glassestarpoline on ground to ensure splills are adequately controlled

2

10

to 3

0 2

adult supervison to minimise spillage

2

10

to 3

0

2

WHS Risk Assessment Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Assessment completed by (team members): _____Desley Pidgeon, Alana Sinnamon______________________________________________


Risk rating

Risk rating

Date of assessment:__August 2019_______________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment:__Street Science during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019_____________________

Location where task/activity is being conducted: ___Marybrough State School multipurpose hall_______________________________________

NATIONAL SCIENCE WEEK STEM POP-UP - MARYBOROUGH

LEAP INTO STEM PROGRAM RISK ASSESSMENT

Activity Provider Name: CQ University

Activity Name: Creating and Extending Realities (CREATE XR) with Oculus Go & Oculus Quest

Name of Person completing this risk assessment: A/Prof. Michael A. Cowling (CQ University Brisbane)

Date of Assessment: 29th July 2019 (for 13th/14th August Event)

RISK CALCULATOR How do you assess the Risk? For each hazard, answer A, then answer B. A + B = The Risk and the action required:

PART A What is the potential impact or consequence?

PART B How likely is it?

PART A + PART B =

Risk Action

1 = Minor. First Aid is required. Little or no lost time.

1 = Low. It may happen, but only rarely.

Score of 1-2 = Low Risk Proceed with caution.

2 = Moderate. Medical Treatment required. Reversible damage to health.

2 = Moderate. It could happen occasionally.

Score of 3-4 = Moderate Risk Regularly monitor the situation.

3 = Serious. Medical treatment required. Irreversible damage including death.

3 = High. It could happen frequently. Score of 5-6 = High to Extreme Risk Do not proceed.

RISK ASSESSMENT

RISK ASSESSMENT RISK CONTROL PLAN STEP 1:

Spot the Hazards (Hazards are things, situations or arrangements that could potentially cause harm to

people, property or the environment)

STEP 2: Assess the Risk

STEP 3: Fix the Problem

Controls & Actions

STEP 4: Responsibility Who & When

STEP 5: Reassess the risk

What task are you doing? What are the risks associated with the task? Is the risk low, moderate, significant or high? (A + B = Risk)

If the task is potentially hazardous, what will you do to reduce or remove the risk?

By whom? And when? Now that you’ve put the strategies in place, assess the risk again.

Extended Reality demonstration with public interaction using iPad digital technology, as well as virtual reality headsets

1. Headsets – drop hazard 2. Supporting equipment – trip / bump

hazard 3. Disorientation/nausea as a result of

adverse reaction to VR software. Worst case, 1 in 4000 chance of an Epileptic seizure.

Moderate (2) + Low (1)

1. Educate participants on handling of headsets.

2. Thoughtful placement of supporting hardware

3. Limit general public exposure times to very short sessions and monitor interaction (especially younger people)

Michael Cowling Low Risk (1)

Work Team: Daniel Pollard

References (Acts, regulations, policies, procedures or any other supporting documentation): N/A






Co

nse

que

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

uen

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Assembly Improper use of Tools. Students use materials toinjure themselves oranother personintentionally orunintentionally.

Building Block Studio incursions are supervised byBuilding Block Studio staff. Participating teachers mustalso supervise their students for the duration of theworkshop. Building Block Studio staff are aware ofprocedures to ensure safe play and behaviour during an incursion and provide students instructions on how to use the provided material in a safe matter. The screw drivers used do not have a sharp end.

Insi

gn

ifica

nt

Rar

e

Lo

w

Assembly / Wiring Shock from Solar Panel Child connects solar panels incorrectly.

The Solar panels used do not pose a shock risk, even in full sunlight. Furthermore the panels do not pose any risk should they be connected incorrectly.

Rar

e

Rar

e

Lo

w

Testing Solar Car Bodily harm caused by contact with gear motors

Child scratchesthemselves, pokes eyeswith materials, puts fingers into gear motor or standson materials.

Building Block Studio workshops involve materials that are clean and safe to use.Building Block Studio staff are aware of procedures toensure safe play and behaviour during the workshop.Building Block Studio staff instructs students how to use materials in a safe manner. Building Block Studio workshops and incursions aresupervised by Building Block Studio staff for the duration of the workshops. Participating teacher’s must also supervise their students for the duration of the workshop.

Lo

w

Rar

e

Lo

w

Student Privacy Unauthorised photography. Photography is a risk forchildren whose identitiesare protected.

Written permission is sought by the Building Block Studio from parents or guardians before any photography is conducted.Strict guidelines are in place for use of photographs inBuilding Block Studio’s promotional publications such as Facebook

Mo

de

rate

Rar

e

Lo

w


Risk rating

Risk rating

WHS Risk Assessment Date of assessment:10/07/2019 Risk Assessment number: ______n/a__________________

Briefly describe the task/activity/plant/equipment: Solar Car Racing during National Science Week Regional STEM Pop-up - Maryborough 2019

Location where task/activity is being conducted: ___Solar car racing________________________________________

Assessment completed by (team members): Daniel Pollard

S/N Activity Hazard PossibleAccident/Illhealthtopersons,fireorpropertyloss

Severity Likelihood Riskvalue RiskControlMeasures

Severity Likelihood Riskvalue

1 VirtualRealityimmersion Nausea StudentsmightexperiencenauseaduringprolongeduseoftheVRheadsets.

2 2 4 StudentsinformedofhazardandsupervisedbySTEMEducatorwhileVRimmersiontakesplace.Studentsarelimitedtoshorterperiodsusingtheheadsetstominimisethelikelihood.

2 1 2

2 VirtualRealityimmersion Fall/bumpofbodyparts

WhilewearingtheVRheadsetsthestudentscanseetheareaaroundthem.Potentialforfallsandcollisionwithfellowstudentsandobjectsintheclassroom.

2 3 6 StudentsinformedofhazardandsupervisedbySTEMEducatorwhileVRimmersiontakesplace.Studentsarelimitedtoshorterperiodsusingtheheadsetstominimisethelikelihood.

3 1 3

3 3DDesignoniPads Electricalwiresdamagedtochargers

Electrocution 5 2 10 Inspect240Vchargingcordsfordamage.Keepelectricalcabletaggingup-to-date

5 1 5

HazardIdentification RiskEvaluation RiskControl

RISKASSESSMENT

DocID:RiskAssessment-STEMprojectbasedlearningworkshop

Date:18thJanuary2019(Rev1.1)

Project:3DDesign,VirtualReality,AugmentedReality

ApprovedBy:MichaelHolmstrom(MDSTEMPunksVenturesPtyLtd)

PUBLICATIONSCASR101Part 101 MOS / AC101-01 (until all parts of MOS are implemented)Ace Aviation Operations Manual and Operational Procedures Library

REFERENCES/ASSUMPTIONS

ACTIVITY OBJECTIVES

Safely and accurately train students basic flight skills and Safety

STAKEHOLDERS1. Ace Aviation2. Students3. Local students

Hazards applicable to this activity which are addressed in the documents listed below are not considered in this risk plan unless deviations exist.

AVIATION RISK MANAGEMENT (AVRM) PLAN

Maryborough Chief Scientist STEM Pop-up Training

CONTEXT:

ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

Conduct Multirotor RePL (<7kg) training

ASSUMPTIONSAll staff competent and currentTask requirements and complexity matches the skills of the crew.

LIMITATIONS Needs to be conducted at each site between 09:00am - 03:00pm (potential to extend to 03:30)

MISSION To conduct safe and efficient training operations

OTHER Ace Aviation CRM

NOMINAL CONDITIONS / SCOPE:

EQUIPMENT

RPA Operations SignageDJI Mavic and associated support equipmentVHF Radio - Aviation bandTraining area layoutGazebos/s for WHS

PERSONNEL

Experienced RPA Pilot/s/trainer/s (The maximum student ratio is 5:1 Instructors)1x Observer (May be a student/teacher/parent)Maryborough SHS has 22 student programmed - will have to spilt into 2 groups for flying and theory, plus reduce flying timings to accommodate number. Aldridge SHS hasa 20 students programmed - will have to split into 2 groups for flying and theory.

ENVIRONMENT Day VMC

Student BehaviourStudents not adhering to safety requirements and venturing into flying

areas - POTENTIAL INJURY

Crossing Kent St if the additional flying area is needed

Safety of crew members (Instructor and students), general public and airspace users is paramount.At any time any ACE Aviation staff may cancel the activity.

Compiled by: Approved By:

Relatively busy road for regional town - MVA risk

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS PARTICULAR TO ACTIVITY

Operating RPAS at the school oval

RPAS mechanical, software or electrical failure

Other approved/unapproved users entering /using the field

RPAS rapid, uncontrollable descent. Impact student pilots or instructor/s on site

RPAS control failure (human or machine)RPA unable to return to landing site and impact with students / Instructors on site, impact with people in surrounding area, impact with infrastructure

or impact with vehicles around site

Fly away AIRPROX or collsion.

Unexpected weather event Rain event, wind or thunderstorm resulting in loss of RPA

Loss of site control Potential breach of 30m regulation by people or vehicles

Operating within 3nm of YMYB. Increased traffic. Maryborough SHS is outside the splays but near

downwind and base RWY 35Aldridge SHS is near downwind RWY 35

AIRPROX or collsion

Maryborough Chief Scientist STEM Pop-up Training SUMMARY

COMMERCIAL-IN-CONFIDENCE AL 1.0

MAIN HAZARDS POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCE

Flying in close proximity to objects (trees, poles and powerlines) and buildings

Collision with objects/buildings resulting in loss of RPA

Date 8-Jul-19Date 8-Jul-19

Dean Witherall

Name:

Position

Dean WitherallCompliance

Manager

Name:

Position

Mark Viswanathan

CRP

HAZARD

Strategic theme Risk CONSEQUENCE Existing ControlsRISK

SEVERITYRISK

LIKELIHOODRISK

LEVELRISK

SEVERITYLIKELIHOOD

RISK LEVEL

ACCEPTABLE TO PROCEED?

T01 RPAS Flying in close proximity to objects (trees, poles and powerlines) and buildings

Collision with objects/buildings resulting in loss of RPA

1. General disposition of flying training area from the nearest obstacles (distance) provides sufficient distance to stop2. Mavics are GPS enabled and can easily/quickly be stopped3. Mavics in ATTI mode have geo-fenced area set to about 40m where they will automatically return to a GPS (Sports) mode

Tolerable Unlikely Medium 5 CRP/RPAS Pilot

1. Instructor/Student ratio is low (5:1 - refer; MOS 2.27 non-complex RPA) and the instructor is present when student is first flying in ATTI to assist.2. Instructor assessment of wind conditions - training terminated if too great3. Pre-flight checks to confirm RTH height/Max distance is set

Tolerable Unlikely Medium 5 Yes

T02 Equitable access of airspace

Operating within 3nm of YMYB. Increased traffic. Maryborough SHS is outside the splays but near downwind and

base RWY 35Aldridge SHS is near downwind RWY 35

AIRPROX or collsion

1. Operational height limit of 100ft (~30m) - set in software.2. Communication methods - RPA Pilot and/or Observer maintaining VHF listening watch3. Observers (number of people on the course)

Minor Rare Low 3 CRP/RPAS Pilot

1. Student briefing before each course2. Emergency descent or motor shutdown3. CTAF 126.554. Activity broadcast every 30mins5. UHF or phone communications between instructors

Minor Rare Low 3 Yes

T03 RPAS Fly away AIRPROX or collsion.

1. Communication methods with BN CEN VHF 124.62. Observers3. RTH limit set to 100ft (~70m)4. Checklists available

Minor Unlikely Medium 4 RPAS Pilot 1. Maintenance procedures2. Pre-Flight checks

Minor Unlikely Medium 4 Yes

T04 RPAS Unexpected weather eventRain event, wind or thunderstorm resulting in loss of

RPA

1. NAIPS Briefings (Must include TAF & TTF/METAR for YMYB and YBAF and Area 40)2.Instructor (or observer if AVBL) tasked with monitoring Wx radar and windspeed onsite if conditions are likely (ie. NR when eg. CAVOK and calm) and observer is to keep the Instructor informed3. Tasks require RPA to be no more than ~20m from primary or secondary landing point

Minor Likely High 6 RPAS Pilot

1. Instructor is to cease flying training if;a) Rain is within 3km or being feltb) Thunderstorm is observed or on radar within 5nm/9.5kmc) Wind is forecast or is above 19kts (Mavic, P3 and P4) or 15kts (M600)

Minor Extremely Rare

Low 2 Yes

T05 People Loss of site controlPotential breach of 30m regulation by people or

vehicles

1. Signage placed at 'usual' entry points2. Observers3. There is limited access for vehicles4.Training areas are laid out to provide natural separation between students5. Parts of grounds are fully fenced6. PPE - Students wear Yellow High Vis and Instructors wear Orange High Vis vests - making non approved persons easier to detect.

Undesirable Unlikely High 6 RPAS Pilot

1. Due diligence by individual pilots2. Due diligence by Instructor3. Schools asked to advise students ovals are out of bounds between 09:00am and 03:30pm.4. Caution tape for open areas with access

Undesirable Rare Medium 5 Yes

Risk Rating after all controls added

H01: Risks associated with student flying training at Maryborough - Maryborough SHS and Aldridge SHS

Risk/ ID

Risk Owner Additional Risk treatment strategies (MITIGATIONS )

08-July-2019Date of last Review:

PRE-MITIGATION Risk Rating

0 (Acceptable) 1 (Negligible) 2 (Minor) 3 (Tolerable) 4 (Undesirable) 5 (Intolerable)

People No injuryMinor injury that does not require medical treatment

Minor injury that requires first aid treatment

Serious injury causing hospitalisation or multiple medical treatment cases

Permanent injury or disability (including blinding)

that may result in hospitalisation of at least

one person

One or more deaths, multiple severe injuries or permanent total

disability

RPASAny element of the RPAS

is degraded but task unaffected

A failure not serious enough to cause RPAS damage but which will result in unscheduled maintenance, repair or

incomplete task

Minor RPAS damage resulting in damage to

components, incomplete task and some future

unserviceability of RPAS

Significant RPAS damage but repairable

Complete loss of or destruction of a RPAS

component (RPA, camera transmitter, sensor, etc.)

Loss of all RPAS elements

ReputationSmall delay, internal inconvenience only

May threaten an element of the service resulting in the task or objective being

delayed

Risk does not violate any law and can be easily remedied. It has some

effect on reputation and/or external stakeholders

Risk does not violate any law and can be easily remedied. It has some

residual effect on reputation and/or external

stakeholders and while reputation is damaged it is

recoverable

Risk violates a law but can be remedied. It has a

residual effect on reputation and/or external

stakeholders and may result in damage to reputation

Risk violates a law and is unable to be remedied. It has a significant

impact on reputation and/or external stakeholders and will

result in loss of reputation

Cost/Property Damage

Negligible Less than $1,000More than $1,000 less than

$10,000More than $10,000 less

than $100,000More than $100,000 less

than $1,000,000Loss or damage exceeding $M1

AirspaceNo aviation airspace safety implication

Minor breach of aviation safety regulations or RPA Area Approval

Serious issues of compliance with aviation safety regulations, RPA Area Approval or operations resulting in potential avoiding action by a manned aircraft but no collision

Serious issue of compliance with aviation safety regulations or operations or the loss of separation resulting in the potential for a collision with a manned aircraft, but the manned aircraft can land with no serious injuries or fatalities

Potential for aviation safety incident/s involving multiple life-threatening injuries, or fatalities, to less than 10 people

Potential for multiple fatal aviation safety incidents causing multiple fatalities, to 10 or more people

Equitable access of airspace

No effect on access to airspace users

Some users of the airspace may perceive or experience airspace inequality resulting in between 5 to 10-minute delay or minor detour

Some users of the airspace may perceive or experience airspace inequality resulting in more than 10-minute delay or major detours

Most users of the airspace will experience airspace inequality resulting in long delay (>30 minutes) or major detours

All users of the airspace will experience airspace inequality resulting in long delay (>30 minutes) or major detours

Airspace users are prohibited from operating in the airspace causing significant disruptions to operations and financial cost

Consequence

0 1 2 3 4 5

Almost Certain 5 5 6 7 8 9 10

Likely 4 4 5 6 7 8 9

Possible 3 3 4 5 6 7 8

Unlikely 2 2 3 4 5 6 7

Rare 1 1 2 3 4 5 6

Extremely Rare 0 0 1 2 3 4 5

Key

>7 Extreme risk

6 to 7 High risk

4 to 5 Medium risk

<4 Low risk Task may proceed.

Consequence

Like

lihoo

d

Task is not permitted. Risk controls are required to ensure residual risk is acceptable. A detailed treatment plan is required.Task is not permitted. Risk controls are required to ensure residual risk is acceptable. Requires CRP attention and treatment plan as appropriateTask may proceed, however, risk must be reduced to ‘as low as reasonably practicable’ (ALARP). Requires CRP monitoring as appropriate.

Leslie Lowe Russell Bennett Lisa Powel Daniel hicks

References Child Protection Act 1999, Work Health and Safety Act 2011, Food Act 2006






Co

nse

qu

en

ces

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore


on

seq

ue

nce

s

Lik

elih

oo

d

Ris

k sc

ore

Vehicle movements Collisions with other vehicles and pedestrians

Physical Injury, impact, crushing

vehicle and pedestrian access and egress are separated

mo

de

rate

rare

me

diu

m 6

Bunting barricading Insufficient and/or unsuitable first aid cover

Untrained person(s) administering first aid

not able to administer first-aid

trained competent personnel, first aid kit,

min

or

rare

low

5

School resources first aid roomThe use of external companies for activities

Staff not trained or vetted for work with children

potential risk/harm to minors

Trained competent personnel, Working with children, Blue Card registration current. m

ino

r

rare

low

5

Poor supervision of event and number of staff not sufficient unsupervised students Number of staff sufficient to supervise mi

no

ru

nli

kel

low

5

Electrical equipment electrocution by faulty equipment, fire

burns, electrocution ensure all electrical equipment tested and tagged

mo

de

rate

rare

me

diu

m 6

Fire (Hot activities e.g. BBQ) fire burns ensue all flammables contained in suitable fire proof containers, fire extinguisher, fire blanket, water access, restricted access (barricaded area), supervised, no student entry

mo

de

rate

rare

me

diu

m 6

School fire emergency/evacuation informationPoor food hygiene preparation Contamination Poisoning Ensure all safe handaing of food procedures followed, trained staffm

ino

r

po

ssib

le

me

diu

m 6

Disposal of waste Contamination pollution Ensure all waste materials removed from site min

or

un

like

ly

low

5

WHS Risk Assessment Risk Assessment number: TECK

Leslie Lowe Russell Bennett Lisa Powel Daniel hicks

13-Aug-19

Risk rating with

Risk rating with

27/07/2019

Indigenous Sciences

Aldridge State High School Maryborough

Activity Provider Risk Assessment · Equipment is suitable for the activity, properly maintained...

Documents

Transcript of Activity Provider Risk Assessment · Equipment is suitable for the activity, properly maintained...