Accountability Scorecards
description
Transcript of Accountability Scorecards
![Page 1: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Accountability ScorecardsOkemos Board of EducationSeptember 2013
![Page 2: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background Information• “Michigan Accountability Scorecards” replace Michigan’s AYP
report cards that were required under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
• Michigan received a waiver from the U. S. Department of Education to develop a new accountability system for school performance
![Page 3: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Overview• Two “levels” of Accountability Scorecards:• District Scorecards & School Scorecards
• Scorecards will use a color coding system to indicate school performance• Green (85% or greater of possible points)• Lime (70% to 85% of possible points)• Yellow (60% to 70% of possible points)• Orange (50% to 60% of possible points)• Red (less than 50% of possible points)
• Combines traditional accountability metrics with Top-to-Bottom labels and other state/federal requirements.
![Page 4: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Color-Coded Scorecards• Colors are given to schools and districts for each “scorecard
component” and an overall color.
• Overall status color is determined using a point-based system from the number of target areas the school/district has met and the school ranking.
Decreasing # points received and increasing # targets not met…
![Page 5: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What Changed?
![Page 6: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What Stayed the Same?• Participation requirement = 95% for school/district overall and
all valid subgroups
• Graduation requirement = 80% for school/district overall and all valid subgroups
• Use of provisional and growth scores for accountable proficiency rates
![Page 7: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
School and District Scorecard Subgroups
Previously ONE group!
![Page 8: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Participation Target• Two options for school/district color status for this target area.
95% Assessed Met 95% Assessed Not Met
• These colors are given ONLY on the participation target portion of the scorecard. This does not change your entire school/district status, however, it can impact your overall color.
![Page 9: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Proficiency Targets
Targets are based on 2011-12 proficiency rates:
• (85 – current percent proficient) / 10 = annual increment
• Increments do not reset
• Proficiency targets are set using PLs 1 & 2 only (not Provisional or Growth Proficient)
• Provisional and/or Growth Proficient will help you meet targets
![Page 10: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Proficiency Targets Example
Example school starts from 65% proficient in subject
Example school ends at (at least) 85% proficient in subject
Example School has +2% Annual Target
![Page 11: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Proficiency “Cell” Basics• All valid subgroups (30 students or more) will have a
proficiency cell with possible points
• Schools and districts will always have an “All Students” group
• All assessed content areas will have cells (Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies)
![Page 12: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Proficiency Cell Colors and Points• Green cells are worth two points and are earned by meeting
the school’s or district’s proficiency target
• Yellow cells are worth one point and are earned by meeting the Safe Harbor target (multi-year averaging of proficiency target)
• Red cells are worth zero points and are earned by not meeting proficiency or Safe Harbor targets
• The Bottom 30% subgroup will earn a green cell and two points by meeting the Safe Harbor target
![Page 13: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Students considered proficient are…
vs.
“Accountable Proficient” versus Proficient
For ‘True Proficiency’ purposes:•Performance Level 1 or 2
For ‘Accountable Proficiency’ purposes:•Students must attain a performance level of 1 or 2 –OR– •Students must attain a scale score that is within 2 standard errors of the proficient cut score (provisionally proficient). –OR– •Students must demonstrate growth at a rate that will allow them to reach proficiency in three years (growth proficient).
![Page 14: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Full Academic Year (FAY)• Students that were present in the building for the last:
• 2 count days + student in end-of-year collection (Elem./M.S.)
• 3 count days + student in end-of-year collection (H.S.)
• Only FAY students can count toward a school or district’s proficiency rates for accountability purposes.
• Limits the impact of student transiency on accountability.
• Ensures that only students that have been educated by the school/district count for proficiency.
![Page 15: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Graduation Rates
![Page 16: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Attendance Rates
![Page 17: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Okemos School’s DataColor(total proficiency points)
School Designation Overall School Percentile Rank (top-to-bottom list)
BW Yellow (86.8%) 93
CO Yellow (86.8%) 93
HI Yellow (78.9%) 85
OPM Yellow (91.7%) Reward 99
Kin Yellow (80%) Reward 96
CMS Yellow (66.7%) Reward 96
OHS Yellow (64.5%) Focus 94
![Page 18: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Okemos District DataStudent Group Reading Proficiency Mathematics Proficiency
All Students 94.29% 86.39%
Bottom 30% 83.27% 56.58%
Black/African American 81.56% 62.14%
Economically Disadvantaged 85.34% 66.57%
English Language Learners 70.00% 56.67%
Students with Disabilities 73.40% 52.22%
![Page 19: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Where to Find the Data• MI School Data (open to the public)• https://www.mischooldata.org/DistrictSchoolProfiles/ReportCard
/AccountabilityScorecard/AccountabilityScorecard.aspx
• Button on Okemos Schools website- home page
• BAA Secure Site (need login and password)• https://baa.state.mi.us/BAASecure/Accountability/EntityScorecar
dStatus.aspx
![Page 20: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
District-Wide Improvement Strategies• Analyze district and building data to determine needs (top-to-
bottom student data file, universal screeners, and common assessments)
• Focus on “high expectations for all students”
• Increase awareness for creating “culturally responsive environments” in our schools • Strategic Plan- Diversity goals
• Study special education service delivery through “Special Education Program Review Committee”
![Page 21: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
District-Wide Improvement Strategies• Continue building a Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) • instructional coaches (expanded to OHS, CMS)• improved core and supplemental instruction• data analysis/ data meetings• professional development• PLCs
• Attend ISD sessions with building administrators and teacher leaders to increase skills in delivering MTSS
![Page 22: Accountability Scorecards](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022070401/56813751550346895d9ee2fc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Questions?