Accompanying measure to support European Territorial Management Information Infrastructure

Yves ReginsterGI consultant - GERE SA

ETeMII:

2

ETeMII

Why ETeMII

Support IST programme focus on content: KA 3

Support EC policy for GI, especially EGIIAddressing pan-European

needs/aspects EC needs to support EU policies

environment, transport, regional policy, space policy (EO, GNSS), agriculture, fishery

Eurostat - GISCO contribution in user’s requirement assessment

3

ETeMII

Why ETeMII (2)

Breaking the barriers for the GI-GIS interoperability to address trans-national applications

To establish European guidelines / standards / best practice

4

ETeMII

Main aims of ETeMII (1)

To build consensus on technical issues: reference data, data access policy

(metadata, thesauri) interoperability, standards implementation Integration with EO, GNSS and telecom participation to global initiatives: OGC, ISO,

GSDI, …Awareness activity

5

ETeMII

Main aims of ETeMII (2)

To organise a network of excellence stakeholders of territorial management:

users and providers Targeting also FP4 & FP5 projects

dealing with GISupport to future GI action line in

FP5 - IST (cross-programme)

6

ETeMII

ETeMII Partnership:

National GI associations:GISFORM, AFIGEO, CNIG

European associations:EUROGI, AGILE, MEGRIN,

European Commission JRC/SAI

Consulting companies, UniversityGERE, GEOBASE Consulting, TUV

Industry, usersSIEMENS - SICAD, OGC Europe

7

ETeMII

7 Workpackages

1 - Project management - GISFORM2 - User’s requirements - GERE3 - Reference data - GISFORM4 - Metadata - GERE5 - Standards, interoperability - GEOBASE6 - Dissemination - JRC / SAI7 - Assessment and evaluation -

GISFORM

8

ETeMII

User’s requirements (1)

Needs for: reference data metadata and semantics standards, interoperability

9

ETeMII

User’s requirements (2)

Differents ways to assess user’s requirements Inventory of FP 4 and FP 5 projects,

dealing with GI User’s workshops

National workshopsEuropean workshopsInternational workshops

Desk study - Case studies

10

ETeMII

FP projects survey

290 GI projects identified up to nowContribution to main ETeMII themes

Contribution to

27%

14%

59%

Reference Data

Metadata

Interoperability in GIS

11

ETeMII

FP projects survey

Clustered Thematics

45%

2%19%

7%

24%

3%

Environment

Technological support

Public sector

Multi-media

GIS

other

12

ETeMII

FP projects survey – some conclusions

Only 27 projects dealing with interoperabilityProjects are not synchronised with market

I.e. mobile location base services is hot today, not next year

Only 2 projects on mobile information services

Good balance between research and development projects

Very few go up to exploitation of information services

13

ETeMII

Reference data (1)

Main aim: To reach a technical consensus on the

definition of reference dataat European levelat global level (GSDI)

To address data policy issues, to make data available at an affordable cost

14

ETeMII

Reference data (2)

Focus on minimum level of reference data, but pan-European

Focus on main users: medium to large scales

Public / Private relationships: to understand GI economy

Assessment of existing situation

15

ETeMII

National workshops

France: link with Lengagne and Mandelkern mission Data policy for public services Re-definition of IGN role and organisation Notion of universal public service for GI

Everybody has the right to be mapped

Need for better coordination between topo and cadastre

16

ETeMII

French workshop

Confirmed by second workshop at MARI Presentation of situations in 5 European countries

FranceNetherlandsBelgium GermanyHungary

Need for better European coordination and harmonisation

Italian workshop last weekGeerman speakers workshop at AGIT

17

ETeMII

The organisation of national workshops (1)

Learn from French oneFocus more on technical issuesCommunication about objectives:

Exploit the opportunities of e-business and e-governance

To understand interaction between public and private sector

Pay attention to updating

18

ETeMII

The organisation of national workshops (2)

Consensus about basic data definitionNeed for EC commitment

To lead EGII To provide funding for the European component

Need for national, regional and local commitment Procurement Contribution to the infrastructure

To target widest possible user’s community

19

ETeMII

The reference schema for the workshops (1)

To identify main usersTo assess main needs

Compare the weight of the different usages, at different scalesWay of representing the realityAccuracy

Express needs for data and updating To identify current and potential needs

20

ETeMII

The reference schema for the workshops (2)

Based on needs: To define basic data, in term of objects,

modelsFocus on major landmarks

The main targets of ETeMII: to create the basic data infrastructure

within 5-6 years To agree on rules: data access, policy,

public/private relationship, etc.

21

ETeMII

The main elements of the basic data infrastructure

Major landmarks, equivalent to 1/10.000

Cadastral data / land registryStandardisation of postal addresses,

enabling geo-referencing

22

ETeMII

Metadata: a key to data access (1)

Build upon existing work: CEO, ESMI, GDDD, GEIXS, ETC/CDS,

GISEDI, LaClef, etc.Main aim:

to reach some consensus on the way to meet user’s needs

link with international initiatives: ISO and JTC 1, SC 32

23

ETeMII

Metadata: a key to data access (2)

The semantic part is important work on thesauri interoperability

to record multi-cultural characteristic of Europe

to deal with multi-lingual issues

24

ETeMII

The first metadata workshop (1)

Four sessions The state of the art The European GI common core Semantics User’s needs and conclusions

25

ETeMII

The first metadata workshop

Presentation of major metadata projects MADAME Dublin Core SCHEMAS FASTER CLEAR Hungarian METATER La Clef ESMI The Global Change project ETC/CDS

26

ETeMII

Main findings (1)

Three levels of metadata Discovery Exploitation Data model

First focus on discovery metadataLack of awareness in main trends for

international standards

27

ETeMII

Main findings (2)

Need for more user friendly standardsNeed for better advertising on and

access to standards Need for metadata on standardsNeed for mapping between existing

discovery metadata standardsFocus on modelling interoperability is

important

28

ETeMII

Main findings (3)

Need for implementation guidelinesNeed for co-ordination with other

disciplinesThesaurus / semantic is important

Need for additional research on thesaurus interoperability

ETeMII should collect user’s requirements to feed ISO/OGC

29

ETeMII

Main findings (4)

Need to raise awarenessOn standardsOn the benefits of metadata and standardsOn implementation guidelines

Organisation of a second workshop13-14 July 2000 – AmsterdamSpeakers = standard makersTo inform usersTo enable to take strategic decision

Dublin Core vs ISO/IEC discovery metadata

http://www.ec-gis.org/etemii

30

ETeMII

Standards, interoperability and research organisation

Main aim: To raise awareness Target FP 4 and FP 5 projects and GI

stakeholdersFocus more on implementation

strategiesHow to improve standards to make

them more user friendly?

31

ETeMII

Dissemination (1)

Web site: http://www.ec-gis.org/etemii

White papers publicationDiscussion lists

GI2000 continuation?CD-ROM publication

32

ETeMII

Dissemination (2)

“All public” leaflets targeted to decision makers, politicians

Many workshops, with all experts invited

Plan for future actions, input to HLWP (GI2000)

33

ETeMII

International co-operation

Strong link with OGCContribution to ISO and GSDI

activitiesAGILE has equivalent in US, links

with international research community

34

ETeMII

Links with other projects

preANVIL, a GIS interoperability observatory - JRC GERE, Geobase, OGCE, Universities of

Jaumes I, Muenster and Vienna, IDELUXGETISCITUISCHEMAS, Diffuse, EPIFOCALothers ?