Academic Literacy and Study Strategies for Secondary-level and College Readers: A Research Update...
-
Upload
hunter-phillips -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Academic Literacy and Study Strategies for Secondary-level and College Readers: A Research Update...
Academic Literacy and Study Strategies for Secondary-level and College Readers: A Research UpdateInternational Reading Association’s 2007 Annual ConventionToronto, Ontario, CanadaMay 14, 2007Co-Sponsored Session College Reading and Learning Association
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D.University of Bridgeport
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
2
Research about Academic Literacies
Flippo, R. F. & Caverly, D. C. (2000). Handbook of college reading and study strategy research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., Barr, R. (2000). Handbook of reading research, Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J. R., Jensen, J. (2003). Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, 2nd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
3
Research about Academic Literacies
• College Teaching• Educational Psychologist• Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy• Journal of College Reading and Learning• Journal of Developmental Education• Journal of Instructional Psychology
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
4
Strategic Studying and Learning
Question 1:
What’s characteristic of “learning?”
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
5
Strategic Studying and Learning
Question 1:
What’s characteristic of “learning?” – Meaningful: Surface versus Deep Learning
(Glaser, 1991; Haggis, 2003)– Long-term versus Short-term Effect– Task Specific (Jenkins, 1979)– Subject Specific– Knowledge Rich (Alexander, 1996)
What works? What doesn’t?
Myths, lies, and misconceptions…
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
6
Strategic Study Reading and Learning
How a Learner Processes Information (Mayer, 1988)
• The focus is on the learner, not on teacher instruction.
• This is not reading comprehension as such but the processes inherent in working with texts for the purposes of recalling, remembering, and producing responses.
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
7
Metacognitive Act
“Know what to do and when to do it”
(Allgood, Risko, Alvarez, & Fairbanks, 2000)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
8
Study Goals
Question 2:
What are basic goals of studying?
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
9
Study Goals
Question 2:
What are basic goals of studying?• Locate Information• Understand and Remember Content• Organize Information (Roe, 2007)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
10
Self-Regulated Learning (Winne, 1995, Martin, 2004)
• Skill & Will to Learn
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
11
Study Strategies
Question 3:
What are strategies?
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
12
Study StrategiesQuestion 3:
What are strategies?• Study Strategies versus Skills• Procedural (Alexander et al., 2000)
» Internalized Procedures & Heuristics» Effect of Subject-Matter Knowledge
– Purposeful– Effortful– Willful– Essential– Facilitative
• Goal Directed• Efficient
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
13
Study Strategies
Question 4:
Name some widely used college and secondary-level study strategies:Before Reading the Text…
Working with the Text…
After Reading the Text….
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
14
Study Strategies• Before Reading the Text Strategies
– Previewing (Surveying)• Working with the Text Strategies
– Underlining– Notetaking– Annotating– Questioning– Outlining– Mapping
• After Reading Strategies– Summarizing– Reviewing– Remembering Vocabulary
• Taking the Test Strategies
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
15
Study Processes
Question 5:
What are underlying processes for successful study?
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
16
Study Processes
Question 5:
What are underlying processes for successful study? – Encoding– Organizing– Monitoring– Employing a Study Plan
• Selecting the Appropriate Strategy for the Task (such as studying for a test) and for the Domain (for example: English Literature or Mathematics)
(Cukras, G. G., 2006)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
17
A Theoretical Framework (Weinstein & Mayer, 1985)
• Rehearsal• Elaboration• Organizational• Monitoring• Affective & Motivational
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
18
Study Processes and Strategies
Weak Strong
_________________________________________
Rehearsal Organizational Elaboration
_________________________________________
Underlining Mapping Annotating
Highlighting Outlining Summarizing
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
19
Discussion Question #1
You are preparing for an exam in psychology. The exam will cover about 8 chapters from your course textbook and your class notes. The test is in two weeks. The test focuses primarily on concepts and vocabulary from those chapters. The test includes application-type questions in which you are expected to choose the appropriate term that illustrates the concept. What would be the best study strategies?
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
20
Discussion Question #1You are preparing for an exam in psychology. The exam will cover about 8 chapters from your course textbook and your class notes. The test is in two weeks. The test focuses primarily on concepts and vocabulary from those chapters. The test includes application-type questions in which you are expected to choose the appropriate term that illustrates the concept. What would be the best study strategies?
– Factual Study Guides (Brothen T. & Wambach, C., 2000)
– Concept Mapping (Romance & Vitale, 1999)– Vocabulary Note Cards– Reviewing Lecture Notes (Austin, J. L., Lee,
M.; Carr, J., 2004)– Practice Test-taking (Gloe, 1999; Collins,
1999)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
21
Discussion Question #2
You have an assignment in your English class to write a paper in two weeks that is a critical analysis of a short story. What would be the best study strategies?
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
22
Discussion Question #2
You have an assignment in your English class to write a paper in two weeks that is a critical analysis of a short story. What would be the best study strategies?
– Annotation– Summarization (Nist & Simpson, 2000)– Generating “why” Questions (Pressley, et al.,
1990)– Theme Writing (SIM, 2006)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
23
Online Study Processes
Question 7:
What strategies have proven successful in online environments?
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
24
Online Study Processes
Question 7:
What strategies have proven successful in online environments?
• Reviewing and Revising Self-Authored Text • Notetaking/Mapping (Hartley, 2002)• Speech-to-Text Support (Elliott, L.; Foster, S.;
Stinson, M, 2002)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
25
Online Study Processes
• Highlighting• Notetaking• Organizing• Summarizing• Annotating• Mapping
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
26
Study Processes and Strategies
Weak Strong
_________________________________________
Rehearsal Organizational Elaboration
_________________________________________
Underlining Mapping Annotating
Highlighting Outlining Summarizing
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
27
New Literacies
Online Processes• identify important questions • navigate complex information networks to locate
appropriate information• critically evaluate that information• synthesize it to address those questions• and then communicate
(Leu, D. J. et al., 2004; Leu, D., et al., in press)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
28
Student Factors• Prior Knowledge
– Domain knowledge the student already has (Alexander & Judy, 1988)
– Declarative, Procedural, Metacognitive, Conditional Knowledge, Volitional (Paris, et al., 1983)
• Student Ability– Metacognitive Ability (Nist et al., 1991; Pressley et al., 1987)– Reading Ability (Poor word recognition skills and low
comprehension versus well-developed reading skills)• Motivation
– “Skill and Will”– Internal Drive– Belief that Studying will make a difference in performance
• Interest– Influences how information is processed – Domain Knowledge makes a difference, too, along with
Interest (Shallert, et al., 1995)
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
29
For more information about the presentation contact:
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D.
Professor of Education
School of Education and Human Resources
Carlson Hall 118
University of Bridgeport
Bridgeport, CT 06604
Patricia Mulcahy-Ernt, Ph. D., IRA 2007
30
For information about the College Reading and Learning Association:
• Annual Conference• State and Regional Meetings• Tutor Certification• Special Interest Groups• Scholarships• Journal of College Reading and Learning
www.crla.net