A Top-down Design Methodology with Embedded Aging Sensors for Robust System Design
18
A Top-down Design Methodology with Embedded Aging Sensors for Robust System Design Xinfei Guo 5/9/2014 2014 Spring ASIC/SOC Design
description
2014 Spring ASIC /SOC Design. A Top-down Design Methodology with Embedded Aging Sensors for Robust System Design. Xinfei Guo 5/9/2014. Outline. Motivation Aging sensor cell Top-down design methodology Future work. Aging/ Wearout. Reliability: time dependent degradation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of A Top-down Design Methodology with Embedded Aging Sensors for Robust System Design
A Top-down Design Methodology with Embedded Aging Sensors for Robust System Design
Xinfei Guo5/9/2014
2014 Spring ASIC/SOC Design
2
Outline Motivation Aging sensor cell Top-down design methodology Future work
3
Aging/Wearout Reliability: time dependent degradation Device level: parametric shift over time (e.g.Vth,u) Circuit and architecture level Irreversible and reversible(e.g. BTI)
&0
0
0
Q
QSET
CL R
S
R
Timing Error!
High Power! Failure!
Slow!
10-1 100 101 102 103 104 10510-3
10-2
10-1
100
TPHY=36A, VG=-4.5V
25OC (0.23)
90OC (0.25)
150OC (0.27)
VT (
V)
stress time (s)
[M. Alam et al. Microelectronics Reliability ’07]
4
Bias Temperature Instability(BTI) Trapping/Detrapping [J. Velamala et al. DAC’12] Get worse and worse Both NBTI and PBTI Stress and Recovery
[M. Lee et al. ASP-DAC ’11]
Time
∆Vth(t1)
t1 t1+t2
∆Vth
0
Vstress RemoveVstress Vstress
RemoveVstress
5
Why Aging Sensor? Track and monitor aging Adaptive circuit tuning (e.g. DVFS) “Check engine light” for recovery techniques
6
Related Work Ring Oscillator based “Silicon Odometer” [T. Kim et al. VLSI ’07, JSSC ’08] - Area overhead, complex, process variation Metastable element based [A. Cabe et al. ISQED ’09][S. Wooters, et al. TVLSI ’12]
- Small and embedded - Good time resolution - Distributed
7
Sensor Cell
Source: S. Wooters, et al. TVLSI ’12
Set the margin
Design the sensor
Check the engine
8
Why Top-Down Design?
Top-down design for sensor itself - Reduce design time - Reduce impact of process variations - Designware cell Top-down design with sensor embedded - Different behavior of each block - Different Thermal Behavior - Distributed with Smaller area overhead
9
Sensor Cell Instantiate the library cell
10
Scan chain cell – Read Output
MUX
FFD
Scan_in
SE
clk
Q
Q
rst
Scan cellNew Scan Cell
MUX
FFD
Scan_in
SE
clk
Q
Q
rst
MUX
Aging Sensor
sel
11
Scan chain cell
12
agingsensor.v
Design Compiler
agingsensor_dc.vScancell
newscancell.v
Design Compiler
newscancell_dc.v
IC Compiler
agingsensor.CELagingsensor.FRAMIC Compiler
newscancell.CELnewscancell.FRAM
New ScanCell Flow
Std cell lib
Architectural choices, RTL compilation and simulation(VCS)
Logic synthesis (Design Compiler)
Formal verification (Formality)
Generation of test patterns (TetraMAX)
Physical design (IC Compiler)
Physical Verification (Hercules)
Layout Parasitics Extraction (StarRC)
SPICE-level simulation of completed design (HSPICE)
Basic DC Synthesis(Design Compiler)
Basic Scan Synthesis Flow(Design For Test Compiler)
Update the netlist
Add to Reference Library (New scan cell library)
13
Top-down design with aging sensor embedded
14
Case Study: Johnson Counter
…n=total # of SDFF;t=user defined parameter; # application dependent for(i=0;i<=n;i+t) {Replace the SDFFARX1 with sensorSDFFX1; Add global control signals; D=deg_in; }…
15
Case Study: Johnson Counter
16
Case Study: Johnson Counter
t=2
t=1
17
Future work Verification Tradeoff between # of sensor vs. accuracy Placement of the sensor Both NBTI and PBTI Optimize area Trigger recovery Silicon Validation
18
Thanks! Q & A
