A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

32
Presented by: Get It, See It, Use It: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story October 4, 2016 Tammy Kobliuk GIS Coordinator Corporate GIS, I.T. Services

Transcript of A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

Page 1: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

Presented by:

Get It, See It, Use It:A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story

October 4, 2016

Tammy KobliukGIS CoordinatorCorporate GIS, I.T. Services

Page 2: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

2

St. Albert’s History with Pictometry

The When

Page 3: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

3

Flight History

2012 Initial Flight

2013 Fill-in Flight

2014 Complete Flight

2016 Complete Flight

Page 4: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

4

Funding

Contracted Services – Data(Operational)

LiDAR

Pictometry

ERJOI (Orthos)

Page 5: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

5

Cost Determinates

Resolution

Area

Required Minimum

Cost

Correction

Page 6: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

6

To RFP or Not To RFP?

Sole-Source

Cost

Integration

Vendors

Page 7: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

7

St. Albert’s Project Specs

The What

Page 8: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

8

Technical Specifications

7.5 cm Resolution

CorrectionNo AccuPlus

Ortho-photo Extra product

Page 9: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

9

Non-Technical Requirements

Spring

Leaf OffNo Snow/Ice

Page 10: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

10

Project Area

• 61.9 km2

• 83 sectors• Primarily urban• some rural

Page 11: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

11

Deployment Model

The How

Page 12: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

12

“Explore” The Cloud• Cloud-based• 500 named / 100 concurrent user license• Corporate GIS administrators• Low cost (< $3000 / year)• Turn key – plug and play

Page 13: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

13

Integration• CAMAlot• Tempest (2017) via Geocortex

Page 14: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

14

Training: Building Our User Base

The Who

Page 15: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

15

Targeting Users• New Employee onboarding form• Employee position changes• Formal course catalog• Gap analysis

Page 16: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

16

Internal Training• Custom to organizational uses/data• Learn use cases• Learn data needs• Build relationships

Page 17: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

17

Breakdown of Accounts by Dept.

Asses

smen

t & Tax

ation

City M

anag

ers O

ffice

Commun

icatio

ns

Culture

Econo

mic Dev

elopm

ent

Engine

ering

FCSS

Financ

e

Fire D

epart

ment

Infras

tructu

re Serv

ices

ITSLe

gal

Enviro

nmen

t

Plannin

g & D

evelo

pmen

t

Policin

g

Public

Work

s

Recrea

tion &

Park

s

Strateg

ic Serv

ices

Transit

Contra

ctor

14

26 6 7

33

15

16

2

10

31

19

11

42

16

36

2

Page 18: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

18

Tips

• Don’t call it GIS• Target enthusiasts• Relevant examples• Quick tips sheet

Page 19: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

19

Organizational Usage

The Uptake

Page 20: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

20

Running The Numbers (last 30 days)

Image Views (4562)

Logins (602)

Named User Accounts (185)

Active Users (72)

Page 21: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

21

Most Prolific Users

Eng.P&DPublic WorksRec & Parks

EngineeringFront Counter

Page 22: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

22

Growth in Active User Numbers

2012

Octo

ber

2012

Dec

embe

r

2013

Februa

ry

2013

Apri

l

2013

June

2013

Aug

ust

2013

Octo

ber

2013

Dec

embe

r

2014

Februa

ry

2014

Apri

l

2014

June

2014

Aug

ust

2014

Octo

ber

2014

Dec

embe

r

2015

Februa

ry

2015

Apri

l

2015

June

2015

Aug

ust

2015

Octo

ber

2015

Dec

embe

r

2016

Februa

ry

2016

Apri

l

2016

June

2016

Aug

ust

2016

Octo

ber

2016

Dec

embe

r

Page 23: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

23

User Stories

The Why

Page 24: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

24

Utility Billing• Water usage reconnaissance• Utility bill audits• Waste pickup complaints• Site visit planning

Page 25: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

25

Development Permits• Real property report compliance• Permit application checks

• Driveway extensions• Sign permits

• Penalty assessments

Page 26: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

26

Development Permits (cont)• Pre-existing structures• Time period evidence• Dimensions • No. stories• Street furniture• Infrastructure

Page 27: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

27

Street Construction Permits1. Confirm details with client2. Correct map information3. Create traffic plan map4. Attach to TMP

Page 28: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

28

Fire Prevention Uses• Large/critical structure pre-plans• Post incident analysis• Arson investigations• Large-scale events• Illegal fire pits

Page 29: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

29

High Content Structures

• A.k.a. hoarder house• Outside vs inside• Complaint driven

Page 30: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

30

What Does the Future Hold?

What would we like to do next?

Page 31: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

31

Future Plans and Desires• Next flight 2018• Geocortex/Tempest integration• 9-1-1 (FDM) integration• Building footprint capture• 3D buildings• Outlaw Google Earth

Page 32: A Successful Pictometry Implementation Story - 2016Oct

32

Questions?

Tammy KobliukGIS Coordinator, I.T. Services

: (780) 459-1730: [email protected]