A Study of the Innovation Usability Model for the Heterogeneous Mobile Product Development

12
- 130 - Scientific Journal of Information Engineering October 2012, Volume 2, Issue 5, PP.130-141 A Study of the Innovation Usability Model for the Heterogeneous Mobile Product Development Yung-Chung Tsao 1 , Kevin Chihcheng Hsu 1 , Yin-Te Tsai 2# 1. Dept. of Information Management, National Central University, Taiwan 32033 2. Dept. of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, Providence University, Taiwan 43001 Email: [email protected] Abstract Information Technology (IT) and Mobile Product Technology (MPT) were not a slogan with the popularity and convenience by rapid growth of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in the world. The mobile products including PC, notebook, GPS Navigator, mobile-phone, etc. are used everywhere including the working, living, leisure and entertainment today, especially for i-phone, i-Pad, Android Tablet have been the necessary equipments for us with the new characteristics of the mobility and networking communication these years. There were many user cognitive gaps (UCGs) and misunderstanding between the New Product Development (NPD) and commercial products according to the related research issues in NPD. The developers always misunderstand and confuse the real user' requirements because of the ambiguous and fuzzy essential. The developed products (especially for those mobile products) usually became failures after those products commercialized into market. As the problems mentioned above, the study uses Innovation Usability Model (IUM) extended from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), as a foundational model as an inspective tools for the user-requirements. The IUM also divides the involved users into the conceptual designers, developers, marketing managers, purchasers and users based on the innovation approach for MPT development. The IUM can inspect and analyze the priority of the critical design-factors in the new product development and reduce the fuzzy criteria of the homogeneous and heterogeneous user-requirements. The results of the study can reduce the failures of the commercialized products in NPD. Keywords: Innovation Usability Model (IUM); Mobile Product Technology (MPT); New Product Development (NPD); User Cognitive Gaps (UCGs); Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) 運用創新可用性模式解決行動產品開發之研究 * 曹永忠 1 ,許智誠 1 ,蔡英德 2 1. 中央大學 資訊管理學系,台灣 32033 2. 靜宜大學 資訊傳播工程學系,台灣 43301 要:全球資訊產品進步與普及,在生活上到處可見資訊產品之使用,資訊科技產品已不再是口號,舉如個人電腦、 筆記型電腦、汽車導航器與手機等等,工作、生活、休閒、娛樂都與這些資訊產品離不開關係。最近幾年,行動性與網 路通訊性的特質加值於這些資訊產品之上,平板電腦、智慧型手機更取代了原有筆記型電腦與手機,成為當紅炸子機, i phone, i Pad, Android 平板電腦等,更成為許多人身邊不可或缺的裝備。 對於新產品研發相關議題,研發時期的產品與上市商業產品常常存在著極大的差異,由於使用者認知差異與真實需求之 * 感謝國科會對本研究之贊助: NSC100-2218-E126-001, NSC100-2410-H-008-051, NSC99-2632-E126-001-MY3, NSC99-2218-E- 126-001, NSC99-2632-E-126-001-MY3, NSC99-2632-E-126 -005 -MY3, NSC98-2511-008-003-MY2, NSC97-2410-H-008-039.

description

Information Technology (IT) and Mobile Product Technology (MPT) were not a slogan with the popularity and convenience by rapid growth of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in the world. The mobile products including PC, notebook, GPS Navigator, mobile-phone, etc. are used everywhere including the working, living, leisure and entertainment today, especially for i-phone, i-Pad, Android Tablet have been the necessary equipments for us with the new characteristics of the mobility and networking communication these years.

Transcript of A Study of the Innovation Usability Model for the Heterogeneous Mobile Product Development

  • - 130 -

    Scientific Journal of Information Engineering

    October 2012, Volume 2, Issue 5, PP.130-141

    A Study of the Innovation Usability Model for

    the Heterogeneous Mobile Product Development Yung-Chung Tsao

    1, Kevin Chihcheng Hsu

    1, Yin-Te Tsai

    2#

    1. Dept. of Information Management, National Central University, Taiwan 32033

    2. Dept. of Computer Science and Communication Engineering, Providence University, Taiwan 43001

    Email: [email protected]

    Abstract

    Information Technology (IT) and Mobile Product Technology (MPT) were not a slogan with the popularity and convenience by

    rapid growth of Information Communication Technology (ICT) in the world. The mobile products including PC, notebook, GPS

    Navigator, mobile-phone, etc. are used everywhere including the working, living, leisure and entertainment today, especially for

    i-phone, i-Pad, Android Tablet have been the necessary equipments for us with the new characteristics of the mobility and

    networking communication these years.

    There were many user cognitive gaps (UCGs) and misunderstanding between the New Product Development (NPD) and

    commercial products according to the related research issues in NPD. The developers always misunderstand and confuse the real

    user' requirements because of the ambiguous and fuzzy essential. The developed products (especially for those mobile products)

    usually became failures after those products commercialized into market.

    As the problems mentioned above, the study uses Innovation Usability Model (IUM) extended from Technology Acceptance

    Model (TAM), as a foundational model as an inspective tools for the user-requirements. The IUM also divides the involved users

    into the conceptual designers, developers, marketing managers, purchasers and users based on the innovation approach for MPT

    development. The IUM can inspect and analyze the priority of the critical design-factors in the new product development and

    reduce the fuzzy criteria of the homogeneous and heterogeneous user-requirements. The results of the study can reduce the failures

    of the commercialized products in NPD.

    Keywords: Innovation Usability Model (IUM); Mobile Product Technology (MPT); New Product Development (NPD); User

    Cognitive Gaps (UCGs); Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

    * 1 1 2

    1. 32033

    2. 43301

    i phone, i Pad, Android

    *: NSC100-2218-E126-001, NSC100-2410-H-008-051, NSC99-2632-E126-001-MY3, NSC99-2218-E- 126-001, NSC99-2632-E-126-001-MY3, NSC99-2632-E-126 -005 -MY3, NSC98-2511-008-003-MY2, NSC97-2410-H-008-039.

  • - 131 -

    1

    1.1

    (PC) PC

    (Notebook, NB)

    (Personal Digital Assistant)

    (Central Process Unit: CPU)(Ghz) CPU

    (Service Science)

    (Communication Technology)

    (GSM) NokiaMotorolaSony Erisson

    /

    90%(NCC) 1 2011 2

    2,829 122.1 [13]

    1 ( FIND)

  • - 132 -

    (First Generation, 1G) GSM (Second Generation, 2G)

    9.6kbps 2.5G GPRS GPRS

    144kbps WAP 2000 5

    (ITU) W-CDMACDMA2000 TDS-CDMA 2000

    IMT-2000 3G

    7.2Mbps

    3G ADSL

    3G (NCC)

    2 2011 2 2,829 2,829

    2,003 70.8%3G 1,717 85.7%

    (WBA) (WiMAX) 2,059 [13]

    2 ( FIND)

    1.2

    iphoneAndroid

    iPadAndroid GPRS 144kbps

    WAP

  • - 133 -

    1.3

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    1.4

    1.

    2.

    2

    2.1

    (the Theory of Reasoned Action, TRA)[5](the

    Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB)[1](Technology Acceptance Model, TAM) (Davis, 1989)[2]

    TRATPBTAM

    Davis TRA TAM

    [2] TRA

    TRA

    Ajzen (TPB)[1](TRA)Mathieson [9] Taylor

    and Todd [10] TPB TAM

    Mathieson TAM TPBMathieson

    [9]

    Taylor and Todd[10] TPB Mathieson

    [9] TPB TAM

    Taylor and Todd TPB

    TPB Taylor and Todd

    TPB

  • - 134 -

    TRATPBTAM

    2.2

    Davis TRA[5][2](TAM) 3

    (Perceived usefulness)(Perceived

    ease of use)

    [4] [6] [7][8]

    3

    [2]

    3 TAM

    1. (Usage Behavior) (Behavioral Intention)

    2. (Attitude)(Perceived Usefulness)

    [3]

    3. (perceived ease of use)

    4.

    Davis

    [3]

    ;

  • - 135 -

    2.3

    [11]

    4

    4

    4

    2.4

    (Product Life Cycle)

    [12]

    5

  • - 136 -

    5

    3

    3.1

    4 1G 4G

    5

    (Usability) (Function) (Innovation)

    (Usability) 6

    7

    6

    7

    3.2

    1.

    2.

  • - 137 -

    3.

    4.

    5.

    3.3

    7 (Constructs)

    8

    H1~H3 H4~H8 2.3 Davis 3

    8

    4

    4.1

    3.2

    (Mobility)

    (Complexity)

    (Effectiveness)

    (Efficiency)

    (Extension)

    4.2

    4.1

    1

    8

    1

  • - 138 -

    1

    1~9 10~14

    15

    1

    1

    ()

    (Mobility)

    Wireless

    Mobile

    Recharging

    Portability

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    *

    ***

    *

    ***

    *****

    *****

    ***

    *****

    *****

    *****

    *****

    ****

    ***

    ****

    *

    ****

    *

    ***

    *

    ****

    15

    20

    10**

    20

    (Complexity)

    Easy to use

    Total Solution

    Handy

    Visual Use

    ***

    ***

    ***

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    ****

    *****

    ***

    *****

    *

    ****

    **

    *

    *****

    **

    ****

    ****

    ***

    *****

    *

    ****

    ****

    *

    ***

    ***

    17

    16

    13**

    16

    (Effectiveness)

    Multi-Functions

    Handy Writing

    Single Control

    Visual Operation

    Yes

    ***

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    ***

    ***

    *

    ****

    *

    *****

    ****

    ****

    *

    ****

    ***

    ****

    *

    *****

    ****

    **

    *

    **

    *

    **

    *

    ****

    13**

    16

    5***

    20

    (Efficiency)

    Easy to use

    Data Sharing

    Composed Function

    Computer-Based

    Yes

    ***

    Yes

    ***

    ***

    Yes

    ***

    Yes

    ***

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    ***

    ****

    *****

    ***

    **

    ***

    ****

    *****

    *****

    ****

    *****

    *

    *

    *

    18

    11**

    12*

    13*

    (Extension)

    Data Share

    Intelligent Use

    Automatic Functions

    Standard

    Yes

    ***

    ***

    Yes

    ***

    Yes

    Yes

    Yes

    ***

    ****

    ***

    *

    ****

    *

    ***

    *

    ***

    **

    **

    *

    *****

    *****

    ****

    **

    *

    *

    *

    **

    16

    12**

    13**

    7***

    Yes 1~5*,15-26*,10-14,1-9

    5

    5.1

    3.2

    9

    9

    5.2 5.3

  • - 139 -

    5.2

    9

    10

    9 10

    9 10

    9

    5.3

    9

    USB

    11

  • - 140 -

    10 11

    6

    [1] Ajzen, I.. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior[M]. Heidelberg:

    Springer (1985)

    [2] Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, et al. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models[J].

    Management Science 35: pp. 982-1003

    [3] Davis, Fred D.. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology[J]. Mis Quarterly,

    Vol.13, Iss.3, pp.319-340 (1989)

  • - 141 -

    [4] Dishaw, M. T. and Strong, D. M.. Extending the technology acceptance model with task--technology fit constructs[J]. Information

    & Management, (36)1, pp. 9-21 (1999)

    [5] Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research[M].

    Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    [6] Hsu and Lu. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience[J]. Information

    and Management (41)7, pp. 853-868 (2004)

    [7] Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W.. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use[J]. Information and

    Management (35)4, pp. 237-250 (1999)

    [8] Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P. and Zhuang Y.. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web[J]. Decision

    Support Systems, (29)3, pp. 269-282 (2000)

    [9] Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned

    Behavior[J]. Information Systems Research (2:3), pp.173-191

    [10] Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A.. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models[J]. Information System

    Research, Vol.6, No.2, pp.145-176(1995)

    [11] Yung-Chung Tsao, Hsin-Kuang Hsuen, Kevin C. Hsu, Yin-Te Tsai. A Exploratory Study on Cognitive Gap Model Based on

    Extension of TAM Applied in Conceptual Design among Designers, Purchasers & Users[J]. 17th World Congress on Ergonomics,

    9-14 August 2009, Beijing, China

    [12] Yung-Chung Tsao, Yin-Te Tsai, Kevin Chihcheng Hsu, Hsin-Kuang Hsuen. The Exploratory Study of the Mobile Device

    Development Strategies Based on Cognitive Usability Model Based Extended from TAM[J]. 2011 International Conference

    Interaction Design, 9-12 Nov 2011, Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    [13] 2011 2 [EB/OL], FIND : http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=295

    11970-

    Email:[email protected]

    3#1964-

    Email: [email protected]

    21966-

    (UCLA)

    (SUNY at Stony Brook)

    Email: [email protected]