Autophagic programmed cell death in the suspensor and endosperm of
A SAGE Approach to Discovery of Genes Involved in Autophagic Cell Death.
-
Upload
clyde-bailey -
Category
Documents
-
view
232 -
download
12
Transcript of A SAGE Approach to Discovery of Genes Involved in Autophagic Cell Death.
A SAGE Approach to Discovery of Genes Involved in Autophagic Cell Death
Acknowledgements
Genome Sciences CentreVictor Ling
Marco Marra
Functional GenomicsSuganthi Chittaranjan
Doug FreemanCarrie AndersonShaun Coughlin
SequencingGenome Sciences Centre
Sequencing Team
BioinformaticsSteven JonesErin Garland
Richard VarholScott Zuyderduyn
SAGE team
University of MarylandBiotech InstituteEric Baehrecke
Programmed Cell Death (PCD)
Function Dysfunction
Deleting damaged cellsCancer
Culling cell number
Deleting structures
Sculpting tissues
Autoimmune diseases
Neurodegenerative diseases
Developmental abnormalities
Programmed cell death
Type I = Apoptotic
• cytoskeletal collapse
• condensation and fragmentation of chromatin and cytoplasm
• preservation of organelles
• phagocytosis by macrophages or neighbouring cells
(heterophagy)
• occurs in isolated cells
Type II = Autophagic
• preservation of cytoskeleton
• formation of vacuoles that engulf cytoplasm and
organelles
• fusion of vacuoles with lysosomes for self-degradation
• late chromatin condensation and nuclear degeneration
• occurs in groups of cells
Autophagic cell death in normal physiology
• Dictyostelium sorocarp formation
• insect metamorphosis •intersegmental muscle, gut, salivary glands
• mammalian embryogenesis •regression of interdigital webs, sexual anlagen
• mammalian adulthood •intestine, mammary gland post-weaning, ovarian atretic follicles
Autophagic cell death in disease
• human neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer and Parkinson)
• cardiomyocyte degeneration
• spontaneous regression of human neuroblastoma
• tamoxifen-treated mammary carcinoma cells (MCF-7)
• bcl-2 antisense treatment of human leukemic HL60 cells
• beclin-1 (apg6) promotes autophagy and inhibits tumorigenesis; expressed at decreased levels in human breast carcinoma
Aims
1. Identify the genes involved in autophagic cell death in vivo.
2. Determine which genes are necessary and sufficient for autophagic cell death.
3. Determine if genes function in mammalian autophagic cell death.
4. Identify the autophagic cell death genes associated with human disease and investigate potential as molecular markers and/or
therapeutic targets.
Experimental Approach
Gene expression profiling (SAGE):• Comprehensive• Gene Discovery
Drosophila model system: • Known cell death genes/pathways are conserved• Genetic and molecular tools• Sequence resources• FlyBase and GadFly databases• Multiple tissues undergo PCD; well-characterized
(Jiang et al., 1997)
• autophagic • stage-specific • synchronous
hr (APF, 18°C)
• known cell death genes are regulated transcriptionally
Reverse transcription - + - + - + - + - + - + 16 18 20 22 23 24
diap2
rpr
hid
RT-PCR analysis
Drosophila salivary gland PCD
Overview of SAGE tag abundance
SAGE
LibraryTotal tags analyzed
Transcripts % of transcripts seen at frequency:
1 2-10 11-100 >100
16 hr 34,989 3,126 32.7 55.7 10.4 1.2
20 hr 31,215 3,034 38.0 50.9 9.7 1.4
23 hr 30,823 2,963 33.3 54.0 11.2 1.4
Total number of different transcripts in all three libraries is 4,628.
Deriving SAGE tag abundance
Total SAGE tags analyzed: • remove linker sequences and duplicate ditags• select a quality cut-off • remove singletons i.e. found only once in all 3 libraries
•Number of different transcripts at each timepoint: • combine libraries (e.g. 16a + 16b) in SAGEspace• export to Excel and count lines/sort by tag numbers
Total number of different transcripts:• compare 16 + 20 vs 23• export to Excel and count lines
Alternate: use Unix commands, e.g. grep – c , unique
Tag-to-gene Mapping in Drosophila(E. Pleasance, M. Marra and S. Jones, in preparation)
Resources: Drosophila genomic sequence, full-length cDNAs, ESTs, salivary gland ESTs
4,628 transcripts:
2866 (61.9%) – known or predicted genes 289 ( 6.2 %) – genomic DNA and EST (but no predicted gene)1170 (25.3%) – genomic DNA and/or reverse strand of gene 303 ( 6.5%) – no match
Comparison of SAGE and real-time quantitative RT-PCR
Fold-difference by SAGE
Fo
ld-d
iffe
ren
ce b
y Q
RT
-PC
R
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0
Correlation coefficient = 0.5
II. Correlation coefficient between fold-difference values (64 samples):
I. Direction of Change:
91/96 samples = 95% concordance
Real time quantitative RT-PCR analyses
• Applied Biosystems 7900 Sequence Detection System
• gene specific primers designed (near SAGE tag) using Primer Express V software
• SYBR Green One-step RT-PCR reagent kit / Melting curve analysis
• sample volume reduced to 15 μl ; n = 3
• “housekeeping” gene and known cell death gene as controls
• used to confirm expression profiles and to resolve ambiguous tag-to-gene mappings
An ecdysone induced transcriptional cascade regulates salivary gland cell death
BFTZ-F1
EcR/USP
BR-C
E74
E93
rprhidarkdronccrq
diap2
Cell Death
E75
SAGE Identifies Genes Associated Previously With Salivary Gland Death
0
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006B
R-C
E7
4
E7
5
E9
3
rpr
ark
dro
nc
iap
2
crq
Ta
g F
req
ue
nc
y (
tag
co
un
t/to
tal t
ag
s)
SG16
SG20
SG23BFTZ-F1
EcR/USP
BR-CE74E93
rprhidark
dronccrq
iap2
CellDeath
E75
Question: What genes didn’t
we find?
Do they contain anNlaIII site?
1244 genes are expressed differentially (p < .05) prior to salivary gland PCD
512 genes have associated
biological annotations (Flybase Gene Ontology)
R. Varhol, S. Zuyderduyn
732 genes have unknown functions
377 of thesewere unpredicted
FlyBase Gene Annotation
Automating the association of differentially expressed genes with biological annotations
Behind the scenes:Incorporation of FlyBase, GadFly, Swissprot, etc.
into DISCOVERYdb
Link database information with differential expression and tag-to-gene mapping data
6 files of pairwise comparisons with genesassociated with annotations of interest
Several trials……
Output of “flyannotation.pl”
Molecular Function SCOP id Protein Domain GO id Bio Process GO id Cell CompartmentATP-citrate (pro-S)-lyase 56059 Glutathione synthetase ATP-binding domain-like6085 acetyl-CoA biosynthesis 5737 cytoplasmactin binding 7015 actin filament organizationgram-positive antibacterial peptide 6961 antibacterial humoral responsegram-positive antibacterial peptide 6961 antibacterial humoral responseeukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding 6961 antibacterial humoral responsegram-positive antibacterial peptide 6961 antibacterial humoral responseantibacterial peptide 6961 antibacterial humoral responseantifungal peptide 57095 Scorpion toxin-like 6966 antifungal humoral responsetranscription factor, cytoplasmic sequestering 48403 Ankyrin repeat 6966 antifungal humoral response 5737 cytoplasmlysozyme 53955 Lysozyme-like 6960 antimicrobial humoral responsemacrophage receptor 52374 Nucleotidylyl transferase 6915 apoptosis 5887 integral plasma membrane proteincaspase 52129 Caspase-like 6915 apoptosis 5737 cytoplasm
6915 apoptosisubiquitin-specific protease 7412 axon target recognitionprotein serine/threonine kinase 56112 Protein kinase-like (PK-like) 7350 blastoderm segmentationprotein serine/threonine kinase 56112 Protein kinase-like (PK-like) 7350 blastoderm segmentationactin binding 7420 brain developmentcaspase activator 50978 Trp-Asp repeat (WD-repeat) 6919 caspase activationcatalase 56634 Heme-linked catalases 6802 catalase reaction 5777 peroxisomeGTPase 16288 cytokinesis 5940 septin ringactin binding 53067 Actin-like ATPase domain 7010 cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis 5869 dynactin complexstructural protein of cytoskeleton 53067 Actin-like ATPase domain 7010 cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis 5884 actin filamentstructural protein of cytoskeleton 53067 Actin-like ATPase domain 7010 cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis 5884 actin filament
49599 TRAF domain 6952 defense responsemonophenol monooxygenase activator 6952 defense responsescavenger receptor 6952 defense response 5887 integral plasma membrane proteinscavenger receptor 6952 defense response 5887 integral plasma membrane proteintransmembrane receptor 52047 RNI-like 6952 defense response 5886 plasma membranescavenger receptor 6952 defense response 5887 integral plasma membrane proteininositol-1,4,5-triphosphate phosphatase 56219 DNase I-like 16311 dephosphorylation
8340 determination of adult life spanubiquitin-specific protease 6514 deubiquitylation
SG16 vs SG23 upregulated (p < 0.05)
Secondary screening of differentially expressed genes
I. Data Mining
II. Gene expression in salivary gland cell death-defective mutant (E93)
III. Gene expression in other dying tissues
IV. Loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutant analyses
Data mining related questions
What differentially expressed Drosophila genes are similar to mammalian genes and associated previously with:
cell death?autophagy?
pathways of interest?tumorigenesis?
cancer?other diseases?
I. Data mining by sequence similarity searches and keyword queries
SAGE tag maps to Drosophila gene
Extract gene sequence from GadFly Database
GadFly – Swissprot Homology (tBLASTX)
Keyword query of Swissprot comments, keywords and identification fields
SAGE tag maps to novel EST
tBLASTX search EST vs Swissprot
Keyword query of FlyBase and PCD database
KeywordData
base
SG
16
SG
23Gene
Sim
(%)Score
Length
(aa)Swiss
Prot idDatabase Description
death
apoptosis
apoptosis
apoptosis
apoptosis
apoptosis
apoptosis
death
death
survivalautophagy
hormone
hormone
cancer
cancer
tumor
tumor
tumor
apoptosis
TNF
BH3
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
FB
FB
PCD
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
45
10
65
1
1EST only
15
0
6
5
4
4
7
61
7
7
7
73
12
7
15
1
0
0
5
102
Nc
debcl
cact
Traf1
CG4719
Ptpmeg
CG4859
CG10777
Rpn2
stck
chrw
ciboulot
CG8706
Atet
CG13907
botv
sp6
CG11335
CG10990
CG4091
CG2023
27.2
25.5
37.1
37.0
39.3
31.3
41.6
18.7
23.7
65.7
35.3
68.6
29.6
39.9
33.2
48.6
28.3
42.7
59.9
59.6
53.9
251
127
322
300
232
101
772
87
160
1276
257
114
1204
469
311
2044
427
423
592
330
247
253
133
203
179
116
80
407
444
267
321
170
34
984
240
203
838
361
182
469
188
228
ICE6_HUMAN
BCL2_HUMAN
IKBA_HUMAN
TRA1_HUMAN
BAR1_HUMAN
PTND_HUMAN
MM11_MOUSE
WRN_HUMAN
PSD2_HUMAN
PINC_HUMAN
RB24_MOUSE
TYB4_HUMAN
LRP2_HUMAN
ABG2_HUMAN
MOT1_HUMAN
EXL3_HUMAN
MASP_MOUSE
LYOX_HUMAN
CASPASE-6 PRECURSOR
APOPTOSIS REGULATOR BCL-2
NF-KAPPAB INHIBITOR ALPHA
TRAF1
BRCA1-ASSOCIATED RING DOMAIN
FAS-ASSOCIATED PTP-1
STROMELYSIN-3 PRECURSOR
WERNER SYNDROME HELICASE
26S PROTEASOME S2
PINCH PROTEIN
RAS-RELATED PROTEIN RAB-24
THYMOSIN BETA-4
LDL RECEPTOR-RELATED PROT
BREAST CANCER RESISTANCE
MONOCARBOXYLATE TRANSPORT
TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR EXL3-LIKE
PROTEASE INHIBITOR 5
PROT-LYSINE 6-OXIDASE PREC.
MM 'APOPTOSIS PROTEIN MA-3'
HS 'TNF-INDUCED PROTEIN GG2-1'
BH3
Data Mining - What next?
• Is it possible to include the “best” match from Swissprot?
• How can we best incorporate information from TrEMBL?
• What genes belong to the same metabolic or signal transduction pathways?
• A new release of GadFly will be available soon. How are the Drosophila databases updated?
• What differentially expressed genes are similar to mammaliangenes up/downregulated in cancer?
(e.g. compare to cancer SAGE libraries)
Secondary screening of differentially expressed genes
I. Data Mining
II. Gene expression in salivary gland cell death-defective mutant (E93)
III. Gene expression in other dying tissues
IV. Loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutant analyses
II. Analysis of differential gene expression in E93 mutant salivary glands
• E93 is a DNA binding protein required for salivary gland cell death (Lee et al. 2000)
• 65 different E93 chromosomal binding positions are known
• Expression of known cell death genes is reduced in E93 mutant salivary glands
• We tested 20 differentially expressed genes with map positions corresponding to E93 binding sites
Gene expression is reduced in E93 mutant salivary glands
19/20 upregulated genes showed a reduction in relative levels of transcription.
Gene Cytological
location
OreR SAGE (16:23)
OreR RT-PCR (16:23)
E93 RT-PCR (16:23)
E93 RT-PCR (16:30)
CecB
CG4091
CecA1
Doa
CG4859
CG14995
BACR19J1.2
CG3845
Ptpmeg
CG9321
Cp1
CG12789
CG1216
larp
CG7860
Cyp1
Phm
Sox14
CG13448
CG8149
ark (control)
3R 99E4-99E4
2R 59F5-59F5
3R 99E4-99E4
3R 98F1-98F2
2R 60D10-60D10
3L 64A7-64A8
X 1B10-1B10
2R 49E1-49E1
3L 61C1-61C1
2L 29E4-29E4
2R 50C20-50C20
2L 28A1-28A1
3L 61A6-61A6
3R 98C3-98C3
X 13E3-13E3
X 14B15-14B15
2R 60A14-60A14
2R 60A14-60A14
3L 71E1-71E1
3R 85D25-85D25
N/A
> 30
105
> 106
> 38
12
> 22
34
25
> 4
23
12
7
> 4
> 11
10.5
11
> 4
> 7
7.2
6
15
2765.7
206.7
177.5
71.9
47.2
40.8
34.6
29.6
14.2
13.7
12.8
10.7
9.1
7.8
4.9
3.5
3.4
2.9
2.5
2.1
2.0
0.1
0.8
0.4
2.1
1.1
0.6
1.4
0.8
0.5
2.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.2
0.5
0.7
3.2
0.5
0.7
3.0
34.2
2.7
2.6
1.2
1.5
0.5
1.9
1.8
0.5
2.2
0.9
1.5
0.8
1.8
0.8
0.5
0.7
2.9
0.2
0.5
3.2
III. Expression of salivary gland genes in the embryo coincides with patterns of PCD
3/15 genes examined have embryonic expression patterns that at least partially coincide with patterns of PCD
CG3132 Cp1
akap200 akap200
IV. Loss-of-function mutant analyses.
e.g. akap200 mutants indicate a possible defect in PCD:
• salivary glands• embryos• retinas
wild-type (41 hr APF) akap200EP2254 (41 hr APF)
Differentially expressed genes reveal molecular features associated with autophagic cell death
• Autophagic cell death involves the induction of genes required for protein synthesis
e.g. 6 different translation initiation factors
• Novel transcription factors share transcription profiles with known salivary gland transcription factors
e.g. maf-S, CG3350
• Components of multiple signal transduction pathways are involvede.g. TNF- like pathway, akap200, Doa
Differentially expressed genes and molecular features of autophagic cell death, continued.
• some apg-like genes are upregulated transcriptionallye.g. genes involved in two ubiquitin-like pathways
CG6194 (apg4;novel cysteine protease)CG5429 (apg6/beclin-1)
• Other autophagy-associated genes are likely involvede.g. lysosomal enzymes, rab-7
• Autophagic and apoptotic cell death appear to utilize at least some common pathways or pathway components
Acknowledgements
Genome Sciences CentreVictor Ling
Marco Marra
Functional GenomicsSuganthi Chittaranjan
Doug FreemanCarrie AndersonShaun Coughlin
SequencingGenome Sciences Centre
Sequencing Team
BioinformaticsSteven JonesErin Garland
Richard VarholScott Zuyderduyn
SAGE team
University of MarylandBiotech InstituteEric Baehrecke