A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National...

29
A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: United States Department of Agriculture United States Department of the Interior National Association of State Foresters October 1995 Third in a Series PMS 446-3 NFES 1845 FOAM VS FIRE Aerial Applications

Transcript of A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National...

Page 1: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

A Publication of theNational WildfireCoordinating Group

Sponsored by:United StatesDepartment of Agriculture

United StatesDepartment of the Interior

National Association ofState Foresters

October 1995

Third in a Series

PMS 446-3

NFES 1845

FOAM VS FIREAerial Applications

Page 2: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has developed thisinformation for the guidance of its member agencies and is not respon-sible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone exceptthe member agencies. The use of trade, firm, or corporation namesin this publication is for the information and convenience of the readerand does not constitute an endorsement by the NWCG of any productor service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

Additional copies of this publication may be ordered from:

National Interagency Fire CenterATTN: Supply

3833 South Development AvenueBoise, ID 83705-5354

Order NFES #

NWCG has been preparing a series of publications entitled "FoamApplications for Wildland & Urban Fire Management" (starting withVolume 1, No.1 in 1988). These documents are available at no charge.They are a series of interagency, international publications that containarticles on firefighting foam, its use and application, with much informationon class A foam and foam delivery systems, etc. in each issue. Tostart receiving a copy of these as they are issued, or to obtain backissues, send your name and complete mailing address to:

Publications, USDA Forest ServiceSan Dimas Technology and Development Center

444 East Bonita AvenueSan Dimas, CA 91773-3198

Page 3: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

A Publication of theNational WildfireCoordinating Group

Sponsored by:United StatesDepartment of Agriculture

United StatesDepartment of the Interior

National Association ofState Foresters

FOAM VS FIRE Aerial Applications

Third in a SeriesOctober1995

Prepared by:Foam Task Group

Fire Equipment Working TeamNational Wildfire Coordinating Group

In cooperation withThe Canadian Committee on Forest Fire Management

and Forest Fire Equipment Working Group

Page 4: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness
Page 5: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................... 1

INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1

FOAM CHARACTERISTICS Foam Concentrate, Solution and Foam......................................... 1AND PROPERTIES Foam Properties ............................................................................ 2

ExpansionDensityDrainage/Drain TimeSurface Tension

Foam Type ..................................................................................... 2Mix Ratio ....................................................................................... 3

PERSONAL SAFETY Working Conditions ....................................................................... 4

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ..................................................................................................... 5

AERIAL APPLICATION Proportioning ................................................................................. 6PROPORTIONING SYSTEMS Batch Mixing .................................................................................. 6

Direct Injection .............................................................................. 6

APPLICATIONS General Tactical Considerations .................................................... 7Rotary-Wing Operations ................................................................ 7Fixed-Wing Tanker Operations ...................................................... 8

Aircraft VelocityDrop HeightAircraft AttitudeWindThermal UpdraftsFuel Arrangement

Single Engine Agricultural Tankers (SEAT) ................................... 9

EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Rotary-Wing Recommendations ................................................. 10MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP Fixed Tanks and/or Buckets

Buckets OnlyFixed-Wing Recommendations ................................................... 10Maintenance and Cleanup .......................................................... 11

APPROVED, AVAILABLE FIRE .................................................................................................... 11CHEMICALS

STORAGE AND SHIPPING .................................................................................................... 11

GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................... 13

SOURCES OF INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 17

METRIC SYSTEM AND .................................................................................................... 19EQUIVALENTS

APPROXIMATE .................................................................................................... 21CONVERSION TABLES

FOAM CONCENTRATE .................................................................................................... 23TO ADD CHART

Page 6: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness
Page 7: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

1

Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness hasresulted in its use in many initial attack situations,and is often used during support actions. Increasedvisibility of foam has enhanced the efficient use ofaircraft by assisting fixed wing and helicoptercoordinators to more accurately place subsequentloads.

Ground forces have grown very enthusiastic aboutaerial use of foam as a method to "buy time". Inground evaluation tests performed in 1989, afoam drop using 0.5 percent solution removed allopen flame from a torching spruce and surround-ing fuels. Subsequently, it held the fire for 45minutes before a very low-intensity flame ap-peared at the bole of the tree. Moisture penetra-tion of the dense duff layer was 50 mm after 38minutes, with a fair amount of foam still visible onthe surface fuels.

Foam will continue to be a vital part of aerialsuppression operations, based on significantlyincreased efficiency when compared to straightwater.

FOAM CHARACTERISTICS AND PROPERTIESClass A foam is a relatively stable aggregation ofsmall bubbles that can adhere to wildland fuels.Foam is made by forcing air into a water solutioncontaining a foam concentrate. The air is intro-duced by means of suitably designed equipmentor by cascading the water and foam mixture throughthe air at high velocity.

The foam adheres to class A fuels excluding theair and enveloping the volatile combustible va-pors at the fuel interface. The foam absorbs theheat generated by combustion and releases waterfrom its bubble structure at a reduced measurablerate. When applied in adequate quantities, it re-sists disruption due to wind, heat, or flame attack,and is capable of re-sealing. Fire fighting foamsretain these properties for varying periods of time,depending on the foam solution and the fire envi-ronment.

Foam is a suppressant not a retardant, and shouldbe used in conjunction with ground forces to besuccessful in all methods of attack.

Foam Concentrate, Solution, and FoamFoam concentrates are liquids that contain foam-ing and wetting agents as well as small amountsof other chemicals to inhibit corrosion, stabilizethe foam, and maintain the homogeneity of theliquid. Although the composition of the variousfoam concentrates are similar, they are not identi-cal and should be handled and stored separately.

OBJECTIVESInterest in chemical applications for range andforest fire fighting has accelerated greatly. Manydocuments have been published concerning theapplication of class A foams. In recent years twopublications were developed by the Foam TaskGroup of the Fire Equipment Working Team (FEWT)to assist the user in foam applications. This publi-cation addresses the aerial application of class Afoams.

NOTE:This document is one of a series of three

"Foam vs Fire" publications that areavailable. These are:

PrimerClass A Foam for Wildland Fires

Aerial Applications

Readers are advised to refer to the other publica-tions for additional detail as required.

INTRODUCTIONWater has always been the mainstay for fire sup-pression. The big question has always been, "Howdo we make water last longer and do a better job?"Adding chemicals to water helps to accomplishthis purpose.

Applying fire chemicals that coat and penetratefuels is not new. Early experiments by the USDAForest Service during the 1930's and the 1940'sdealt with the problems and advantages of aerialapplication strategies. In 1954, the first "Opera-tion Firestop" evaluation program field tested chemicalsfor wildland fire control which paved the way foruse of chemicals in aircraft.

In terms of effectiveness, foam by acting as acarrier for water affects all three parts of the firetriangle by:

1. Removing heat from the fire as moisturedrains from the foam.

2. Blanketing fuels with foam temporarily al-ters fuel availability.

3. Depriving the fire of oxygen through thesame blanketing action.

������������������������������������

FUEL

OXY

GEN

������������������������������������

FUEL

OXY

GEN HEATFIRE

������������������������

FUEL

Page 8: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

2

Drainage/Drain TimeThe stability of the bubble mass is measured bythe rate at which the foam releases the solutionfrom within its bubble structure. This process,known as drainage, is a measure of the foam'seffective life.

As the foam drains and the solution is released, itbecomes available for wetting of fuels. Foamswith short drain times provide solution for rapidwetting. Foams with long drain times release so-lution over a longer period while maintaining aninsulating capability.

Surface TensionThe foaming agent component of the foam con-centrate facilitates the formation of bubbles andthe stabilizer strengthens the bubble wall to main-tain their structure. The wetting agent (surfactant)reduces the surface tension of the draining liquidso that the fluid can spread more readily, andpenetrate deeper into organic fuels at a faster ratewhen compared to water.

Foam TypeFoam type is a term used to describe the consis-tency of foam by drain time and expansion ratio.Foam type is important to understanding how thefoam will perform. A foam with a fast drain timeand a 5:1 expansion ratio performs differentlythan a foam with a slow drain time and a 15:1 ratio.The foam types you will use are low expansiontypes and are as follows:Expansion Drainage

1:1 FOAM SOLUTION (0.1 - 0.3%) Rapid- A clear to milky fluid- Lacks bubble structure- Mostly water

WET FOAM (0.3%)- Watery- Large to small bubbles- Lacks body- Fast drain times

FLUID FOAM (0.5%)- Similar to watery shaving cream- Medium to small bubbles* Flows easily* Moderate drain times

DRY FOAM (0.8 - 1.0%)- Similar to shaving cream- Medium to small bubbles* Mostly air* Clings to vertical surfaces

20:1 - Slow drain times Slow

* These are the most important characteristics for thefirefighter.

Foam concentrates are added to water (in amountsprescribed by the manufacturer and approved byUSDA Forest Service Interim specifications) toproduce a foam solution which, when aerated,produces foam. Foam is a relatively stable massof small bubbles made by forcing air into watercontaining the foam concentrate. Class A foamsare designed specifically for fighting fires in classA fuels.

Foam PropertiesExpansion

Expansion is the increase in volume of a solution,resulting from the introduction of air. It is a char-acteristic of the specific foam concentrate beingused, the mix ratio of the solution, the age of theconcentrate, and the method of producing thefoam.

Expansion ratios are divided into three classesrelated to how much foam is generated.

Low expansion 1:1 to 20:1Medium expansion 21:1 to 200:1High expansion 201:1 to 1000:1

Note: Low end is commonly achieved,upper end needs special nozzles to

achieve.

In aerial applications, low expansion foams aremade. The expansion rate is affected by dropheight, air speed, tank or bucket configuration,and percent concentrations of the foam agent.Physical mechanisms are explained further underApplications on pages 6 and 7.

A 10 to 1 (10:1) expansion of a 1-percent solutioncreates a foam that is 90 percent air, 9.9 percentwater, and only 0.1 percent foam concentrate.The net result is a foam that is much lighter thanwater given the same volume.

The use of cold water and cold concentrate re-duces the expansion rate of the foam generated.Expansion is one of several characteristics thatshould be considered in tailoring a foam for aspecific task.

DensityThe density of a foam is its weight per unit volume.It affects how well foam holds together whenapplied from a delivery system and the resistanceto the effects of wind. A low expansion (relativelylittle air, and thus heavier) foam has a higherdensity and more resistance to deflection by thewind than a medium or high expansion (mostly air,with a little foam solution, and thus lighter) foam.

Normal Water SurfactantDroplet Added

➤➤➤➤ ➤

➤➤ ➤➤➤

➤➤➤➤ ➤

➤➤ ➤➤➤

Page 9: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

3

Ground Support (within 30 minutes No Ground support

Forest Floor Forest Floor

TreeShallow Deep

TreeShallow DeepCanopy Canopy

WET DRIPPING FLUID DRY

Open (FBP System fuel (FBP system fuel Open (FBP system ()FBP Systemtypes C-1, C-7, types C-2, S-2, fuel types fuel types

S-1, O-1 S-3 C-1, C-7 C-2, s-2, S-3)S-1, O-1)

DRIPPING WET WET WETFOLLOWED BY FOLLOWED BY FOLLOWED BY

Closed DRIPPING* Closed DRY-operational* DRY*(FBP system fuel (FBP system fuel (FBP system fuel (FBP system fuel

types types types typesC-4, C-5 C-3, M-1, C-5, C-3, M-7,C-6, D-1) M-2, M-4) C-6, D-1) M-3, M-4)

A dry foam holds its shape, adheres well, andreleases its solution slowly, creating a better insu-lating blanket than a wet foam which flows, drips,and releases its solution quickly. Fluid foam re-leases the solution more rapidly than a dry foambut holds its shape and adheres better than a wetfoam. Fluid foam may be better at cooling andwetting than dry foam. Foam solution is a slightlyfrothy fluid that may be the choice when rapidpenetration of liquid is necessary such as attack-ing deep-seated fires and smoldering snags.

As you can see, many types of foam can be made,and each type is best suited for a specific applica-tion. Different foam types are produced by alter-ing the amounts of air and/or foam concentrateused to produce the foam.

Mix RatiosThe user's specific needs and objectives must beidentified before determination of a suitable mixratio. Since each foam tank or bucket systemproduces an unique foam for a given mix ratio, thefoam can be tailored to the specific need. If theneed is to protect tree crowns, a fairly dry foam—slow draining and adhering—should be used. Forthe pretreatment of the perimeter of a prescribedburn area, a slow draining to moderately rapiddraining foam is required. The drainage should be

fast enough to provide general wetting. Eachmanufacturer suggests concentrations to be usedfor a range of needs. However, since numerousfactors such as water hardness and temperatureaffect the type of foam produced, these sugges-tions should only be considered as a startingpoint.

PERSONAL SAFETYThe U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) For-est Service approved foam concentrates havemet the standards for skin and eye irritation.Additional requirements include oral and dermaltoxicity.

Foam concentrates are strong detergents. Theycan be extremely drying and exposure to the skinmay cause mild to severe chapping. This can bealleviated by applying a topical cream or lotion tothe exposed areas. A small number of people mayexperience allergic reactions when they come incontact with the foam.

All of the currently approved foam concentratesare mildly to severely irritating to the eyes. Any-one working with foam concentrates should useprotective splash goggles. Rubbing the eyes orface may result in injury if hands have becomecontaminated with the concentrate during han-dling.

Recommended Foam Consistencies for Aerial Applications

Page 10: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

4

To minimize the problems from prolonged expo-sure to the skin and eye the following precautionsshould be taken:

* Review and follow information providedin Material Safety Data Sheets.

* When mixing concentrates, goggles, wa-terproof gloves, and rubber boots shouldbe worn.

• Clothing soaked in concentrates shouldbe removed and rinsed with water.

• Inhalation of foam vapors can be irritat-ing to the upper respiratory tract, andshould be avoided.

• Eyes splashed with concentrate or so-lution should be flushed with clean wa-ter for at least 15 minutes.

• Users should be aware that spilled con-centrate is very slippery.

• Hand lotion should be used to avoidchapping.

• Avoid contaminating potable water sourceswith concentrate or solution.

• Make sure concentrate container is emptyprior to opening a new one.

• Portable eyewash stations should beconsidered for aircraft operating sites.

• All safety precautions associated withground crews near retardant drops alsoapply to aerial foam drops.

• Properly secure (or remove) used con-tainers from the aircraft operating area.

All personnel involved in handling, mixing andapplying foam concentrates or solutions should

be trained in proper procedures to protect boththeir health and safety as well as that of theenvironment. All containers of foam concentrateor solutions should be labeled to alert personnelthat they MUST NOT be used for drinking pur-poses. If a foam concentrate is ingested, theindividual should seek medical attention as soonas possible. Caution should be taken to preventthe mixing of class A and class B foam concen-trates. Personnel must follow the manufacturer'srecommendations as found on the product labeland product material safety data sheet (MSDS).

Note: Some agencies may have additionalregulations and policies that apply to the

safe handling and utilization of foam.

Working ConditionsFoam concentrates and solutions contribute toslippery conditions. All spills MUST be cleaned upimmediately.

Spills of foam concentrate can be covered withsand or absorbent material and then removedwith a shovel. Do not apply water directly to thespill area. Foaming and possible contamination tothe surrounding area may result.

Spills MUST NOT be flushed into drainage ditchesor storm drains. Do NOT flush equipment neardomestic or natural water supplies, creeks/rivers,or other bodies of water. If a spill occurs orconcentrate enters a water supply, contact yourlocal authorities immediately. Be prepared to pro-vide appropriate manufacturer's information.

Care should be taken during planning and appli-cation that personnel applying foam from the ground

Page 11: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

5

are able to stand in untreated areas as theyproceed. Stepping onto a foam blanket whichconceals objects or holes can be dangerous.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNSAs our nation strives to reduce human impacts toforest and range and ecosystems, it is importantthat we know about the environmental effects ofclass A foam products.

Aquatic toxicity is perhaps the most scrutinizedeffect of class A foam products because the sur-factants in the foam products interfere with theability of fish and other aquatic organisms toobtain oxygen from water. Aquatic toxicity is de-termined by measuring the survival or reproduc-tive impairment of an aquatic species (commonlya fish or invertebrate) at several concentrations(or mix ratios) of a chemical over a specified timeperiod. The results from these exposures can beused to estimate the amount of chemical that willresult in 1 to 100% mortality of a species. Theconcentration of chemical that results in 50%mortality (LC 50) is commonly used in reports orMaterial Safety Data Sheets because it can becompared with the same 50% value for manyother chemicals. This indicates how toxic onechemical is relative to another. Using the 50%mortality value is not appropriate for determiningan acceptable level of effect in the field. This isespecially true when one considers that the cur-rent acceptable risk for an endangered species iszero.

Fire suppressant foams diluted for use in firefighting are more than 99 percent water. Theremaining one percent contains surfactants (wet-ting agent), foaming agents, corrosion inhibitors,and dispersants.

Approved fire suppressant foam concentrates,and the solutions resulting when the concentrateis mixed with water, have been tested and meetspecific minimum requirements with regard tomammalian toxicity:

• Acute oral toxicity• Acute dermal toxicity• Primary skin irritation• Primary eye irritation.

Because a very small amount of foam concentrateretains very good wetting capabilities, extra pre-cautions should be taken to avoid getting anyconcentrate into the water.

Prior to any application of chemical products getapproval from the responsible land managementagency.

Follow these guidelines and precautions to mini-mize the possibility of foam concentrate or solu-tion entering a stream or other body of water:

1. During training or briefings, inform fieldpersonnel of the potential danger of firechemicals, (especially concentrates) instreams or lakes.

2. Locate foam mixing and loading pointswhere contamination of natural water,especially with the foam concentrate, isminimal.

3. Pumping systems are recommended forrefilling reservoirs with concentrate toreduce spillage. Commercial pour spoutsfor 5 gal tanks are available that reducespillage.

4. Maintain all equipment and use checkvalves, where appropriate, to prevent re-lease of foam concentrate into any bodyof water.

5. Exercise particular caution when usingany fire chemical in watersheds wherefish hatcheries are located.

6. Locate dip operations to avoid run-off ofcontaminated water back into the stream.

7. Use a dip tank, rather than dipping di-rectly from a convenient body of water, toavoid releasing any foam into these es-pecially sensitive areas.

8. Use a pump system equipped with checkvalves to prevent flow of any contami-

Page 12: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

6

nated water back into the main body ofwater.

9. Avoid direct drops of foam into rivers,streams, lakes or along lake shores, do-mestic wells or agricultural lands. Usealternative methods of fireline building.

10. Promptly notify proper authorities if anyfire chemical is used in an area wherethere is likelihood of negative impacts.

11. Whenever possible set up dip tanks withina containment area instead of dippingdirectly from bodies of water.

AERIAL APPLICATION PROPORTIONINGSYSTEMSProportioningThe first step in creating foam is adding the re-quired amount of foam concentrate to water tocreate foam solution. This process is known asproportioning. In aerial applications there are twomethods of proportioning foam concentrates; batchmixing and direct injection.

Batch MixingThe simplest method of making a foam solution isto manually add foam concentrate to the watersupply. This method, called batch mixing, is com-monly used with portable tanks in helicopter bucketoperations. It is also used with fixed wing tankersthat are not equipped with direct injection proportioners.A measured volume of concentrate is poured intoa measured volume of water to yield a foamsolution of the recommended strength.

Batching can be wasteful, the required volumes ofboth water and concentrate are estimated, espe-cially when refilling a partially full tank. It is diffi-cult to change mix ratios. Dip sticks or sightgauges may be useful for more accurate batchmixing.

The concentrate should be added to water, be-cause adding water to the foam concentrate causesexcessive foaming in the tank when water is added.Bucketing operations generate rotor downwashwhich can cause foam generation and blow foamaround the site. Since foam concentrate is heavierthan water, mixing or recirculation of the concen-trate/water mixture is required to obtain a homo-geneous solution. To improve mixing in cold wa-ter, use relatively warm concentrate. The solutionshould be used as soon as possible for optimumperformance.

Direct InjectionThe proportioning systems used to produce foamsolution in airtankers and helitankers inject thefoam concentrate into a tank or bucket using apump and timer system triggered by the pilot.Circulating systems have been devised for somehelibuckets but dispersion of the foam concen-trate depends on injection pressure and the oftenminimal agitation occurring during flight.

The consistent foam injection rate combined withcareful calibration provides an accurate methodof proportioning that is straightforward and reli-able.

Many exclusive use contracts require helicoptercontractors to furnish equipment for dispensingfoam concentrates into buckets. Call-When-Needed(CWN) contracts have provisions allowing thecontractors to furnish equipment for dispensingfoam concentrates.

APPLICATIONSFoam has no long-term retardant effect. It is thewater component that suppresses the fire. Whenthe water drains away or evaporates it is noteffective. Foam's performance is determined byits drain rate, expansion ratio, and surface ten-sion. The inability to generate useful foam may bedue to use of the wrong type of foaming agent,foam generator problems, improper application,or inappropriate expectations of the foam's per-formance.

One important feature of foam is that the applica-tor can see where it has been applied; and foamtends to stay where it is applied. Usually, as longas foam is visible, the treated fuel remains wet.However, a foam's effectiveness as a barrier should

Page 13: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

7

not be judged by visibility alone. Fire may burnunder or through a thick blanket of foam thatdrains too slowly to thoroughly wet adjacent fuels,while a rapidly draining foam that disappearsquickly may leave behind very wet fuels as thedraining fluid penetrates the fuels.

The width and depth of foam drop pattern dependprimarily upon aircraft attitude, drop height anddrop speed.

Foam durability depends on the weather. Foamwill be visible in exposed areas for at least 15minutes in hot weather, up to several hours in coolweather, and in shaded areas it will be visibleeven longer.

Drainage information should be a key consider-ation when delivering foam. The objective beingthe most cost effective method to suppress thefire. If the user knows the fuels and can read thefire's activity from a vantage point, the most effi-cient use of each measure of foam delivered byfixed wing and helicopters will be made. This canbe achieved by specifying the mix ratio that yieldsa foam draining at a rate that is most beneficial.Matching foam with the fire fighting needs in-creases the effectiveness of the water being ap-plied, and decreases the effort necessary to ac-complish the mission.

Air shear is the main mechanism for incorporatingair to generate the bubble structure when solu-tions are delivered by airtankers, helitankers, andhelibuckets. How efficiently the solution is con-verted from a liquid to a foam depends on thevolume of the tank or bucket, the air speed, thedrop height, and the mix ratio. Exiting liquid issheared only on the periphery of the solutionpackage; consequently the smaller the volume

the more rapid is foam generated. The rate atwhich the outer boundaries of the fluid mass areaerated depends on the velocity of the solutionthrough the air.

General Tactical Considerations:• Wind drift is higher with drier foams (>0.3%).

• Deep fine fuels such as grass require foamsolution or wet foam to penetrate the fuelbed—foam solution (0.1-0.3%).

• Exposed medium fuels such as chaparral orsouthern rough require wet foam (0.3%).

• Heavy fuels such as slash piles—Wet foam(0.1% to 0.3%).

• Hover drops where you want foam to clingto snags, down logs or brush piles—in-crease concentrations but not to exceed1.0%.

• Surface fines under canopy—wetter foamsat lower concentrations to penetrate canopy.

• When working closely with ground forces -use lowest effective concentration to mini-mize impact on crews (ie. slippery condi-tions, masking fire from ground crews). Com-munications with ground forces is essentialin this type of operation.

• Use foam with care in steep rocky areaswhere footing can be hazardous for crews.

• Consider use of foam drop on helispot fordust abatement—more effective than water(0.3-0.6%).

Rotary-Wing OperationsAirspeed and height above the ground will directlyeffect the length of line and coverage level. Varia-tions in airspeed and altitude can be used tochange coverage and pattern. Drops generallywill be made directly on the fire line, at the head offires with short flame lengths, or on the flanksworking toward the head on fires with longer flamelengths. Caution should be used when performinghover drops to avoid rotor down wash fanning thefire.

Close coordination between the crew leader andpilot is absolutely essential. Using the pilot as anobserver/scout, the risk can be minimized and thetime to control a fire greatly reduced. Cautionmust be used when applying direct attack tech-niques.

Page 14: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

8

There appears to be adequate air shear from 60feet with helicopter hover drops. An increase inthe mix ratio generally works the same as in-creased aircraft speed or increased drop heightfor increased aeration of foam.

Fixed-Wing Tanker OperationAircraft velocity, drop height, tank system flowrate and drop volume, aircraft attitude, wind con-ditions and fuel arrangement will affect the groundpattern or footprint of the foam drop. The affectwill be more pronounced as foam concentrate mixratios increase (drier foams). Knowledge of howthese parameters effect foam delivery can beused to increase the effective use of foam. Themix of techniques used will depend on individualfire situations encountered. Fixed wing delivery offluid or wet foam will have similar drop character-istics to water-like retardant. Recommended lit-erature can be found in the Sources of Informationsection.

Aircraft VelocityAircraft velocity can have a significant effect onthe shearing (foam generation) of the load andground pattern placement. Increased velocitieslengthen patterns, decrease the coverage levelon fuels and also produces drier foam.

As fire intensity increases, the foam coveragelevel should be increased.

Making drops at a consistent ground speed shouldincrease the accuracy of the drops.

Fixed wing tankers are limited to a narrow rangeof drop speeds as compared to rotary wing tank-ers (the CL-215 normally drop at 100-110 kts).

Drop HeightFoam drops from lower than recommendedheight are unsafe and will reduce the patternseffectiveness. This will have significant potentialto cause injury to ground personnel, break out theoverstory, damage equipment and dislodge rocks,logs, and tools from the large unbroken mass offoam solution (not generated foam) impactingvelocity and force.

A drop height of 100 feet is adequate when thesolution exit rate is slow but as the volume in theexiting mass increases, drop height must be in-creased above canopy to achieve foam formation.As fire intensity increases a lower drop height canbe used to form a more dense, compact andwetter foam load. A lower drop height will alsoincrease the forward momentum of the load whichcan be used to penetrate thicker canopies.

For lower intensity fires a higher drop produces alarger, less dense drop cloud (greater foam gen-eration). The most efficient and uniform coverageof foam on fuels is realized when near vertical fallof the suppressant is achieved if the canopy is nottoo dense.

Recommended drop heights vary with the aircraftused. The CL-215/415 aircraft drops range be-tween 100-175 feet above canopy. Single engineagricultural aircraft have recommended drop heightsbetween 40 to 120 feet above canopy.

Drop heights will also vary with vegetation coverand terrain. If drop heights are too low, there willbe considerable movement and breakage in thecanopy. If drop heights are too high, the dropcloud will tend to break up and drift away from thetarget. The suppressant cloud "breakup" will de-crease the level of foam coverage on the fire.

Aircraft AttitudeAircraft attitude is more a function of load place-ment than a planned influence on the shape of thefootprint:

1. Level attitude normally produces a uni-form elliptical pattern

2. Diving tends to shorten the pattern andbrings the core of the load forward re-ducing the available effective length.

Page 15: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

9

3. Lofting or lifting tends to elongate thepattern increasing the line length in traceamounts at the tail end of the load.

4. Banking tends to force the core of theload to the outside on the turn due to thecentrifugal force. The effects on thepattern is usually minimal. This can beeffective for "throwing" a load into asection of the fire where the airtankercannot fly.

5. Dropping loads on a downhill run tendsto elongate the pattern.

Diving and lofting are not commonly used in fixedwing tanker foam operations.

WindThe effect of wind on foam suppressant can besignificant and can be used to advantage:

1. Headwind has a similar effect on the pat-tern as diving.

2. Downwind affects the pattern similar tolofting by elongating the drop.(Less intensefires—longer line increased coverage).

3. Crosswind can have the most significanteffect on pattern placement. Crosswind dropsare subject to drift and will diffuse the pat-terns core. The effect is relative to windvelocity and can be considerable. The flightpath needs to be moved upwind to com-pensate for the drift.

Thermal UpdraftsHigh intensity fires often generate thermal up-drafts which erode foam drops and reduce theireffectiveness. To compensate, use a combinationof wetter loads, lower drop heights, or headwinddrops.

Fuel ArrangementCanopies intercept foam preventing it from reach-ing surface fuels and fires. When attacking sur-face fires mix ratios should be reduced to make awetter foam to penetrate the canopy.

In canopies with laddered fuels, foam can be usedto treat all fuel levels by dropping progressivelydrier foams.

Single Engine Agricultural Tankers (SEAT)These aircraft are best used with short turnaroundtimes. To maintain short turnaround times, air-fields closest to the fire or fires in need of aerialsuppression should be evaluated for suitabilityand avenues secured for SEAT operations prior toemergency needs. This can include, road accessto enable the support truck to move to the closestairfield to supply foam concentrate and fuel. Availablewater supply at the remote airfield to supportSEAT operations is preferred, but this can bereplaced or supplemented by a water tender ornurse tanker. Agency oversight may be needed atthese remote operations. This should be some-one familiar with SEAT, foam and fire suppressionoperations.

The SEAT aircraft must be able to communicatewith ground firefighters, other aircraft, and withdispatching centers assigned to the incident. Aradio system to meet this need should be utilizedin all SEAT aircraft. The radio system used tocontact ground personnel should be separate fromradio systems required for air to air transmis-sions.

SEAT pilots should have working knowledge ofwildfire terminology, size up, strategy and tacticsprior to being assigned any operational missions.A pilot of a SEAT aircraft that is dispatched to anarea they are not familiar with should require abriefing addressing dispatching procedures, flighthazards, fire behavior, fuel types, and local poli-cies. As pilots gain experience in aerial attack ofwildfires, they can be dispatched as initial attackwithout other aerial or ground forces directingthem. This type of use is an agency organizationdecision and should be predicated on the level ofperformance required for such operations.

Page 16: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

10

EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS,MAINTENANCE AND CLEAN-UPRotary-Wing Recommendations

Fixed Tanks and/or BucketsCompatibility of Materials: The materials used inconstruction of any foam dispensing unit must becompatible with all foams, and resistant to corro-sion, erosion, pitting, etching, or softening.

Installation: The foam pumping unit and concen-trate reservoir must be affixed to the helicopter ina way that prevents injury to personnel or damageto the helicopter. The design must meet the ulti-mate inertia forces specified in Federal AviationRegulations (FAR) 23.56 1(b)(2). All parts of thefoam pumping unit must be designed so that noabrasion or damage occurs at points of contactwith the helicopter.

Location of Unit: The preferred mounting locationof the foam pumping unit and concentrate reser-voir is external to the helicopter and attached to(or within) the water supply.

Maintenance: The foam dispensing system isexpected to require no major maintenance duringeach fire season. In the event that maintenance isrequired it is the contractor's responsibility, un-less furnished by the government or agency.

Operation: The pilot of the aircraft must be able tooperate the unit with a minimal level of attentionso as not to interfere with normal flying of theaircraft. An automatic system would be preferred.Under no circumstances can any phase or aspectof the foam dispensing system impair the flightsafety of the aircraft. Once the control is set forflow rate, there should be no adjustment neces-sary to the unit.

Flow Rate: The system must be capable of dis-pensing a variable amount of concentrate, in flight,to achieve a mix ratio ranging from 0.1 to 1.0percent by volume. See page 23.

Concentrate Loading: If bulk loading is to be used,a system must be employed such that any spillageof the concentrate will not come into contact withthe helicopter. Servicing must be accomplishedduring normal refueling time for the helicopter andtake no longer than the refueling operation.

Buckets OnlyRouting of Hose: The hose used to carry theconcentrate must be routed out the side of thehelicopter away from the pilot. Hoses must berouted in a manner that will not interfere with flightcontrols.

Breakaway Fittings or Connectors: All hose orelectrical connections must have a disconnectthat will pull away from the hose when the bucketis released. The disconnect must be close to thehelicopter to keep the hose or electrical cablesfrom beating against the helicopter. The helicop-ter side of the disconnect must be able to hold thefluid pressure in the line, and be able to be pulledapart at one-third the buckets empty weight. Thelower part of the hose must be securely attachedat the bucket so that, if the bucket is released, asufficient load is applied to the disconnect torelease it.

Containment: Any unit mounted inside the heli-copter (other than those that have Standard Tech-nical Approvals or 337's), must have a contain-ment vessel around the pumping unit and concen-trate storage supply. The concentrate reservoirmust be able to hold 125 percent of the concen-trate supply. Even in moderate turbulence, thecontainment vessel must be able to contain thefoam concentrate. The discharge hose and fit-tings must have a containment sleeve of clearhose so that leaks will be visible.

Size: The unit must be small enough to easily fitinto or onto the helicopter or inside the bucketitself.

Foam Quantity: The unit shall carry a minimum of5 gallons of concentrate for every 100 gallons ofbucket capacity.

Vibration: The unit must be designed and con-structed so as not to be damaged or fail due tovibration or shock loading when installed in thehelicopter. The unit must not cause undue vibra-tion in the helicopter during operation or in flight.The unit must be designed and installed so as notto cause any concentrated stress on the helicop-ter.

Fixed-Wing RecommendationsThe foam concentrate pumps should have bronzeor stainless steel body housings. Aluminum pumphousings will not last very long.

The electric motors used in the aircraft should beof sufficient horse power to drive the pump. Themotor should be reversible to allow filling of thefoam concentrate holding tank.

The use of plastic fittings or plumbing (rigid tubingor flex hose) should be limited to areas where therisk of being damaged is low or if the plasticplumbing fails, the resulting foam concentratespillage will not cause damage to the aircraft.Plumbing should be routed so that maintenance

Page 17: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

11

personnel and flight crews can visually monitorthe system so that any leaks can be dealt withimmediately. The use of plastic fittings mountedabove water tanks would be acceptable.

Maintenance and CleanupScheduled calibration checks and adjustmentsshould be included in maintenance schedules toensure the systems are operating correctly.

All foam concentrates have a detergent base.Therefore, cleansing of all plumbing, pumps, tanks,and other exposed surfaces can be expected.This may promote the corrosive actions of water.

The CL-215/415 tanks can be flushed at the endof each mission by picking up and dropping 1 or 2loads of fresh water. Loads can be dropped aheadof the fire, on hotspots or flaming brands that havebeen missed, or in the center of the fire to aid withsmoke abatement. They should not be droppedon the foam line or into the water source. Theaircraft can also be washed on its return to base.

APPROVED, AVAILABLE FIRE CHEMICALSA wildland chemical qualification, testing, andapproval program (Interim Requirements for WildlandFire Foam) is carried out for the various agenciesby the National Wildfire Suppression Technology(NWST) Group, Missoula, MT, and the Technol-ogy and Development Center, San Dimas, CA(SDTDC). The program covers all fire chemicalsincluding long and short-term retardants, as wellas foam concentrates. For use in Canadair CL-215/415 aircraft, Canadair carries out a qualifica-tion testing and approval program. In the future allfoams are expected to be approved under anInternational Wildland Fire Foam Specification.

The Qualified Products List (QPL) for approvedclass A foams is updated annually and madeavailable to the field by mid January of each year.Current QPL's can be obtained from either NWSTor SDTDC.

STORAGE AND SHIPPINGIt is recommended that concentrates be stored inthe original polyethylene containers only. Do notstore concentrates in steel tanks. The concen-trates are corrosive (as are foam solutions); how-ever, they meet USFS requirements for corrosionlimits.

All concentrate being shipped is required to betransported with Material Safety Data Sheets(MSDS).

Page 18: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

12

Page 19: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

13

Aspirate To draw in air; nozzle aspirating systems draw air into the nozzle to mixwith the foam solution.

Automatically Regulated A proportioning method or device that readily adjusts to changes in waterflow and or pressure to maintain a desired mix ratio.

Balanced See Automatically Regulated.

Barrier Any obstruction to the spread of fire; typically, an area or strip devoid offlammable fuel.

Batch Mix Manual method of proportioning; the addition of foam concentrate to awater storage container or tank to make foam solution.

Biodegradation Decomposition by natural biological processes.

Blanket A body of foam—used for fuel protection and/or suppression.

Bubble The building block of foam; bubble characteristics of water's content anddurability influence foam performance.

Class A Fire Fire in "ordinary" combustible solids. (However, if a plastic readily meltsin a fire, it might be Class B rather than Class A.)

Class A Foam Foam intended for use on Class A or woody fuels; made from hydrocar-bon-based surfactants, which possess excellent wetting properties.

Class B Fire Fire in flammable liquids, gasses, and greases.

Class B Foam Foam designed for use on Class B or flammable liquid fires; made fromfluorocarbon-based surfactants, therefore capable of strong filming ac-tion, but incapable of efficient wetting of Class A foam.

Combination Nozzle Also called an "adjustable fog nozzle." This nozzle is designed to provideSystems (CAFS) either a solid stream or a fixed spray pattern suitable for water or wet w a -

ter application.

Compressed Air Foam A generic term used to describe foam systems which combine air underpressure with foam solution to create foam in the hose.

Concentrate A substance that has been concentrated. The form in which foamsuppressant is transported and stored. Water is added to prepare it foruse.

Consistency Uniformity and size of bubbles.

Corrosion Result of chemical reaction between a metal and its environment (i.e., air,water, and impurities in same).

Degradation The act of foam degrading or being reduced in rank, status, or condition.

Density The weight of a specific volume of material.

Drain Time The time (minutes) it takes for foam solution to drain from the foam mass;for a specified percent of the total solution contained in the foam to revertto liquid and drain out of the bubble structure.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Page 20: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

14

Dry Foam A low expansion foam type with stable bubble structure and slow draintime which is used primarily for resource and property protection.

Durability The effective life span of foam bubbles.

Durable Foam Foam products, as yet undeveloped, which, when mixed at 1 percent orless, will remain effective at preventing ignition for 12 hours; will workwith current class A foam delivery systems including proportioners,aspirating nozzles, CAFS, fixed wing and rotor wing aircraft; will meetrequirements for corrosion, health, safety and environmental impact.

Eductor A mixing system that uses the drop in pressure created by water flow todraw the fire chemical into the water stream for mixing; enables a systemto draw foam concentrate, as well as water, into the hose line.

Environment The complex surroundings of an item or area of interest, such as air,water, natural resources, and their physical conditions (temperature,humidity).

Expansion The ratio of the volume of the foam in its aerated state to the originalvolume of the non-aerated foam solution.

Fire Retardant Any substance that by chemical or physical action reduces the flamma-bility of combustibles.

Fire Suppressant Any agent used to extinguish the flaming and glowing phases of combus-tion by direct application to the burning fuel.

Fluid Foam A low expansion foam type with some bubble structure and moderatedrain time, exhibiting properties of both wet and dry foam types, which isused for extinguishment, protection and mop-up.

Foam The aerated solution created by forcing air into, or entraining air in, awater solution containing a foam concentrate, by means of suitablydesigned equipment or by cascading it through the air at a high velocity.

Foam Blanket A layer of foam which forms an insulating and reflective barrier to heatand is used for fuel protection, suppression and mop-up.

Foam Concentrate The concentrated foaming agent as received from the manufacturer; useonly those approved for use in wildland fire.

Foam Generation The foam production process of forcing air into or intraining air in foamsolution, creating a mass of bubbles.

Foam Line A body of foam placed along areas to be protected from fire; also used asan anchor for indirect attack in place of hand-made fire trail.

Foam Solution A homogeneous mixture of water and foam concentrate.

Foam Systems The apparatus and techniques used to mix concentrate with water tomake solution, pump and mix air and solution to make foam, andtransport and eject foam.

Foam Type A term used to describe the consistency and viscosity of low expansionfoam as the combination of drain time and expansion.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Page 21: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

15

High Expansion Foam with an expansion between 201:1 and 1000:1.

Inductor A control mechanism that allows a regulated quantity of foam concen-trate to be introduced into the main hose line.

Ingredient Each chemical component used in the formulation of a product.

Low Expansion Foam with an expansion between 1:1 and 20:1.

Manually Regulated A proportioning method or device that requires the operator to makeadjustments to maintain a desired mix ratio over a changing range ofwater flows and pressures.

Medium Expansion Foam with an expansion between 21:1 and 200:1.

Mix Ratio The ratio of foam concentrate to water, usually expressed as a percent.

Mixing Chamber A tube constructed with deflectors or baffles, that mixes foam solutionand air to produce tiny, uniform bubbles in a short distance (1 to 2 ft).

Monitor A turret-type nozzle usually mounted on an engine.

Nozzle Aspirated A foam generating device that mixes air at atmospheric pressure withFoam System foam solution in a nozzle chamber.

Proportioner A device that adds a predetermined amount of foam concentrate to waterto form foam solution.

Scrubbing The process of agitating foam solution and air within a confined space(usually a hose) that produces tiny, uniform bubbles - the length and typeof hose determine the amount of scrubbing and, therefore, foam quality.

Slug Flow The discharge of distinct pockets of water and air due to the insufficientmixing of foam concentrate, water and air in a compressed air foamsystem.

Suppressant An agent used to extinguish the flaming and flowing phases of combus-tion by direct application to the burning fuel.

Surface Tension The elastic-like force in the surface of a liquid, tending to minimize thesurface area and causing drops to form.

Surfactant A surface active agent; any wetting agent. A formulation which whenadded to water in proper amounts will materially reduce the surfacetension of the water and increase penetration and spreading abilities ofthe water.

Toxicity The quality or state of being harmful, destructive or deadly, oftenexpressed as a lethal concentrate or dosage necessary to kill a givenpercentage of a test population.

Use Level The appropriate ratio of liquid foam concentrate to water recommendedby the chemical manufacturer for each class of fire.

Vapor Suppression Creating a seal with foam which prevents a release of flammable vaporsfrom fuels.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Page 22: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

16

Viscosity A measure of a fluids resistance to flow, an indication of the ability of thefoam to spread over and cling to fuels and to cling to itself.

Wet Foam A low expansion foam type with few and varied bubbles and rapid draintime which is used for rapid penetration and fire extinguishment.

Wet Water Water with added chemicals, called wetting agents, that increase water'sspreading and penetrating properties due to a reduction in surfacetension.

Wetting Agent A chemical that, when added to water, reduces the surface tension of thesolution and causes it to spread and penetrate exposed objects moreeffectively.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Page 23: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

17

Aerial Retardant Application and Use. 1995. NARTC Training Course. Joe Madar, Course Leader.Marana, AZ.

Cote, Arthur E. 1986. Fire Protection Handbook, 16th edition. National Fire Protection Association,Quincy, Massachusetts.

Dip Tanks for Type 1 Helicopter Operations, Aviation Tech Tips. 9457 1307-August 1994. San DimasTechnology & Development Center, USDA Forest Service, 444 E. Bonita Ave., San Dimas,California 91773.

Friedman, Raymond 1989. Principles of Fire Protection Chemistry, 2nd edition. National Fire ProtectionAssociation, Quincy, Massachusetts.

George, Charles W. 1981. Determining Airtanker Delivery Performance Using a Simple Slide Chart-Retardant Coverage Computer INT-113. Intermountain Research Station, Missoula, Mon-tana.

George, Charles W. An Update on the Operational Retardant Effectivieness (ORE) Program. Intermoun-tain Research Station, Missoula, Montana.

George, Charles W. 1992 Improving the Performance of Fire Retardant Delivery Systems on the Fixed-Wing Aircraft. Intermountain Research Station, Missoula Montana.

Hill, Paul R., Charles W. George, George Roby, Interim Requirements and Manufacturer SubmissionProcedures for Wildland Fire Foam. August 1986. (Special Report 8651 1803) Copiesavailable from Technology & Development Center, USDA Forest Service, 444 E. Bonita Ave.,San Dimas, California 91773.

International Fire Service Training Association 1983. Essentials of Fire Fighting, 2nd edition. FireProtection Publications, Stillwater, Oklahoma.

McKenzie, Dan W. Proportioners For Use in Wildland Fire Applications, 9251 1204—SDTDC. Copiesavailable from Technology & Development Center, USDA Forest Service, 444 E. Bonita Ave.,San Dimas, California.

NFPA, 298, 1989. Foam Chemicals for Wildland Fire Control. National Fire Protection Association,Quincy, Massachusetts.

NFPA, 1967 Chemicals for Forest Fire Fighting. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massa-chusetts.

Norecol Environmental Consultants Ltd. 1989. Toxicological Review of Fire Fighting Foams. Preparedfor Manager, Fire Management Forest Protection Branch, Ministry of Forests and Lands,Victoria, BC, Canada.

NWCG Fire Equipment Working Team, Foam Task Group. Foam Applications for Wildland & Urban FireManagement. Copies available from Technology and Development Center, USDA ForestService, 444 E. Bonita Ave., San Dimas, California.

NWCG Fire Equipment Working Team, Foam Task Group. Foam vs Fire Primer. Copies available fromthe National Interagency Fire Center, 3833 S. Development Ave., Boise, Idaho, 83705. NFES2270

NWCG Fire Equipment Working Team, Foam Task Group. Foam vs Fire Class A Foam for Wildland Fires.Copies available from the National Interagency Fire Center, 3833 S. Development Ave.,Boise, Idaho 83705. NFES 2246

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Page 24: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

18

NWCG, NWST, 1992. Foambib, A Bibliography of Wildland Fire Foam Evaluation and Use. NationalWildfire Suppression Technology Group. Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, P.O. Box8089, Missoula, Montana 59807

Ogilvie C.J., M.E. Alexander, R.J. Lieskovsky, and J. Bird. Guidelines for aerial application of foam onforest fires in western and northern Canada 1994 (In press)

Parminter, John 1989. A Primer On Wildland Fire-Fighting Foams. Ministry Of Forests, British Columbia,Canada.

Seevers, Melinda R. and John A., Field Survey of Helicopter Foam Injection Systems. Copies availablefrom Technology & Development Center, USDA Forest Service, 444 E. Bonita Ave., SanDimas, California 91773.

The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has sponsored the publication of the following videosproduced by the NWCG Fire Equipment Working team. Copies of each of these items may be orderedfrom the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC). Attn: Supply, 3833 Development Avenue, Boise,Idaho 83705-5354.

Introduction to Class A Foam, 1989NFES #2073

The Properties of Foam, 1992,NFES #2219.

Class A Foam Proportioners, 1992,NFES #2245

Aspirating Nozzles, 1992,NFES #2272

Compressed Air Foam Systems, 1993,NFES #2161

Tactical Applications with Class A Foam, 1994NFES #2404

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Page 25: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

19

METRIC SYSTEM AND EQUIVALENTS

The purpose for including the following metric system equivalents and approximate conversion factorsis to meet the requirements of Public Law 100-418. This law requires each Federal agency to use themetric system of measurement by Fiscal Year 1992, in procurements, grants, and other business relatedactivities.

Linear Measure Liquid Measure

1 centimeter = 10 millimeters = 0.39 inch 1 centiliter = 10 milliliters = 0.34 fl ounce

1 decimeters = 10 centimeters = 3.94 inches 1 deciliter = 10 centiliters = 3.38 fl ounces

1 meter = 10 decimeters = 39.37 inches 1 lite r= 10 deciliters = 38.82 fl ounces

1 dekameter = 10 meters = 32.80 feet 1 dekaliter =10 liters = 2.64 gallons

1 hectometer = 10 dekameters = 328.08 feet 1 hectoliter =10 dekaliters = 26.42 gallons

1 kilometer = 10 hectometers = 3,280.8 feet 1 kiloliter = 10 hectoliters = 264.18 gallons

Weights Square Measure

1 centigram = 10 milligrams = 0.15 grain 1 sq centimeter = 100 sq millimeters = 0.155 sq in

1 decigram = 10 centigrams = 1.54 grains 1 sq decimeter = 100 sq centimeters = 15.5 sq in

1 gram = 10 decigrams = 0.035 ounce 1 sq meter = 100 sq decimeters = 10.76 sq ft (centare)

1 dekagram = 10 grams = 0.35 ounce1 sq dekameter = 100 sq meters = 1,076.4 sq ft

1 hectogram = 10 dekagrams = 3.52 ounces (are)

1 kilogram = 10 hectograms = 2.20 pounds 1 sq hectometer = 100 sq dekameters = 2.47 acres (hectare)

1 quintal = 100 kilograms = 220.46 pounds1 sq kilometer= 100 sq hectometers = 0.386 sq mi

1 metric ton = 10 quintals = 1.1 short tons

Cubic Measure

1 cu centimeter = 1000 cu millimeters = 0.06 cu inch1 cu meter = 1000 cu decimeters = 35.31 cu feet1 cu decimeter = 1000 cu centimeters = 61.02 cu inches

Page 26: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

20

Page 27: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

21

APPROXIMATE CONVERSION FACTORS

To Change To Multiply By To Change To Multiply By

inches centimeters 2.54 ounce-inches newton-meters 0.007062

feet meters 0.305 centimeters inches 0.394

yards meters 0.914 meters feet 3.280

miles kilometers 1.609 meters yards 1.094

square inches square centimeters 6.451 kilometers miles 0.621

square feet square meters 0.093 square centimeters square inches 0.155

square yards square meters 0.836 square meters square feet 10.764

square miles square kilometers 2.590 square meters square yards 1.196

acres square hectometers 0.405 square kilometers square miles 0.386

cubic feet cubic meters 0.028 square hectometer acres 2.471

cubic yards cubic meters 0.765

cubic meters cubic feet 35.315

fluid ounces milliliters 29,573 cubic meters cubic yards 1.308

pints liters 0.473 milliliters fluid ounces 0.034

quarts liters 0.946 liters pints 0.2113

gallons (US) liters 3.785 liters quarts 1.057

liters gallons (US) 0.264

gallons (Imp) liters 4.546 liters gallons 0.264

liters gallons (Imp) 2.220 grams ounces 0.035

gallon (US) gallon (Imp) 0.333 kilograms pounds 2.205

gallon (Imp) gallon (US) 1.201 metric tons short tons 1.102

ounces grams 28.349

pounds kilograms 0.454 PSI kilopascals 6.895

short tons metric tons 0.907 kilopascals PSI 0.145

pound-feet newton-meters 1.365 acres hectares 0.405

pound-inches newton-meters 0.11375 hectares acres 2.470

Temperature (Exact)

°F=Fahrenheit °C=Celsius

°F=(°Cx9/5)+32 °C=5/9x(°F-32)

Page 28: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

22

Page 29: A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group ... · A Publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Sponsored by: ... Ongoing evaluation of foam effectiveness

23

.1 12.8 19.2 25.6 32.0 38.4 44.8 51.2 57.6 64.0 76.8 96.0 1.0 1.5 2.0oz oz oz oz oz oz oz oz oz oz oz gal gal gal

.2 25.6 38.4 51.2 0.5 76.8 89.6 102.4 115.2 1.0 153.6 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0oz oz oz gal oz oz oz oz gal oz gal gal gal gal

.3 38.4 57.6 76.8 96.0 115.2 134.4 153.6 172.8 1.5 230.4 2.25 3.0 4.5 6.0oz oz oz oz oz oz oz oz gal oz gal gal gal gal

.4 51.2 76.8 102.4 1.0 153.6 176.2 204.8 230.4 2.0 307.2 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0oz oz oz gal oz oz oz oz gal oz gal gal gal gal

.5 0.5 96.0 1.0 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.0 2.25 2.5 3.0 3.75 5.0 7.5 10.0gal oz gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal

.6 76.8 115.2 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.6 4.5 6.0 9.0 12.0oz oz gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal

.7 89.6 1.05 1.4 1.75 2.1 2.45 2.8 3.15 3.5 4.2 5.25 7.0 10.5 14.0oz gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal

.8 102.4 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.8 6.0 8.0 12.0 16.0oz gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal

.9 115.2 1.35 1.8 2.25 2.7 3.15 3.6 4.05 4.5 5.4 6.75 9.0 13.5 18.0oz gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal

1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 6.0 7.5 10.0 15.0 20.0gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal gal

FOAM CONCENTRATE TO ADD CHART

Gallons of Water100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 750 1000 1500 2000

Per

cen

t F

oam