A PROP EVALUATION EXPANDING ON THE RESULTS · PDF fileOntario Geological Survey Compilation...

42A11NE0798 2.12222 WARK 010

f fx o Peer y

A PROPERTY EVALUATION EXPANDING ON THE RESULTS OF THE

GEOTEM SURVEY WARK TOWNSHIP

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION ONTARIO

RECEIVED

FE0271989

MINING LANDS SECTION

BRYAN T MULOIN, B.SC., B.ED.GEOLOGISTBOX 1312FORT ST JAMES BCVOJ 1PODECEMBER 1988

e 2

42A!"NE0798 2.12222 WARK 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Introduction 4

History of Exploration 5 ,

Geology 9

Geophysical Evaluation 10,11,12

Conclusions and Recommendations 13

Statement of Qualifications 14

Bibliography 15,16

LIST OF PLANS AND FIGURES

FIGURE . PAGE

1. Location of Property Area Ontario Map 7

2. Claim Location Map 8

PLAN IN POCKET

Magnetometer Surveys:

Terraquest LtdGeotemBryan T Muloin

Derivatives of Magnetic Surveys:

Geotem 2nd Vertical Derivative Terraquest Ltd vertical magnetic gradient

Electromagnetic Surveys:

Geotem, Channel l at 350 micro secondsTerraquest VLF EM Cutler Maine with Flight lines shownBryan T Muloin, VLF EM Cutler Maine ground survey

Interpretation of Geology:

Terraquest Ltd from airborne VLF EM and magneticsBryan T Muloin from ground surveyBryan T Muloin from compilation of data including Geotemsurvey

INTRODUCTION

This report is a compilation study of recent exploration

including the Geotem Survey on or in the vicinity of a group of 8

unpatented mining claims in Wark Township, porcupine Mining

Division, District of Cochrane, Ontario. See Figure l for

general location and Figure 2 for claim locations in Wark

Township.

The area is flat, locally swampy, land with total relief of about

45 feet. The North Porcupine River cuts midway through the

claims flowing south of east. See map sheet titled, Terraquest

Ltd Airborne magnetic and VLF EM Survey interpretation for local

claim locations. Access to the property is via: bush roads from

highway 656 about 5 kilometers to the west, by boat along the

river in spring runoff, or bush roads l kilometer from the

Ontario Northland Railway to the southwest. The claims are 18

kilometers north of the city of Timmins.

The group of 8 claims cover almost 320 acres, about 150 hectares,

located as follows:

Claim No Location Recorded Holder

P878501 NW1/4 Sl/2 L4 Con II Arvo Salo

P878502 NE1/4 Sl/2 L4 Con II Arvo Salo

P756530 NE1/4 Nl/2 L4 Con I Arvo Salo

P756531 SW1/4 Sl/2 L4 Con II Arvo Salo

P756532 SE1/4 Sl/2 L4 Con II Arvo Salo -

P756533 NE1/4 Sl/2 L4 Con I Arvo Salo

P1026985 SW1/4 Nl/2 L4 Con I Arvo Salo

P1026986 SW1/4 Nl/2 L4 Con I Arvo Salo

HISTORY OF EXPLORATION

The Texas Gulf rush of 1964 sparked extensive geophysical a

diamond drill examination of this area. The Kidd Creek mine, lu

km to the northwest, is in Kidd Township which adjoins Wark

township to the west. Numerous airborne surveys cover the area dating from that time, but are not generally available to the public.

North American Rare Metals Limited did magnetic and horizontal

loop Em Surveys covering the area in 1964 and is available as file T688 from the Ontario Geological Survey, Resident Geologist in Timmins. Hollinger Consolidated Gold Mines did VLF and

magnetic surveys in 1971 available as File T903. This work identified a northwest trending conductor near the western

boundary of the claim group. Comstate Resources identified soil gold anomalies south of the claim group, their work is available as file T2482 (1984).

Terraquest conducted airborne magnetometer and VLF surveys early in 1988 which cover the full 8 claim group. Their work is available in assessment file T3.063 from the Resident geologists office, Ontario Geological Survey, Timmins. Included with that

file is a ground survey including magnetometer, VLF and horizontal loop surveys conducted by this writer for Mr. Salo.

Wark TownshipTd.mmJ.ns9

Figure 1Location of the Timmins Area of Ontario and of the Wark Township property area.

Figure 2: Location of the Salo 8 Claim Block in Wark Township. Photoreproduction of SE part of Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Claim Map G3989 dated Octover 15, 1987; Scale, approximately Ifc mile to 1 inch.

GEOLOGY

Ontario Geological Survey Compilation Series Map 2205 covers Wark

Township. It indicates the presence of a northwest trending

fault following the North Porcupine River across the claim group.

Northeast of the fault clastic sedimentary rocks, composed of

greywackes, argillites, siltstones cover the area, to the

southeast a series of felsic pyroclastic meta volcanics is

indicated in contact with the sediments and forming a synclinal

fold. Beyond these interpretations from a map at a scale of l

inch to 4 miles little is known of the geology as there are no

out crops and no close drill holes.

GEOPHYSICAL EVALUATION

This study is an expansion on the data from the Geotem airborne

EM survey. To accomplish this, the flight line profiles were

obtained from R. B. Barlow, Chief of the Geophysics/Geochemistry

Section, Ontario Geological Survey. Of the information

represented on these profiles, the 2nd Vertical derivative of

magnetics was extractable and channel l at 350 microseconds which

is the most responsive and representative profile was extracted.

Because of low amplitude in the magnetics on the profiles this

data was recovered from the map of the total intensity magnetic

survey. All are plotted on the same base maps at a scale of l to

5,000 covering the claims area. With this data the several other

surveys pertinent to the area including Terraquests airborne VLF

EM and magnetic surveys and this writej^^rjsund surveys with

interpretations are included. In all a collection of 11 maps are

reproduced at the same scale showing the available data on this

interesting property.

The writer has a natural bias to ground surveys, first because

this is what he does, but primarily as is concluded by the study

of Kornik, McGrath, Holroyd and Hood 1975 "Airborne surveys can

never possess the same resolution of an equivalent ground

survey" . The ground surveys were conducted using a proton

precession magnetometer, Scintrex MP2, a Crone VLF, and Geonix

EM17L. The grid used has lines 125 meters apart in an east-west

direction and stations every 25 meters.

GEOPHYSICAL EVALUATION (Continued)

The Geotem EM survey strongly identifies a series of north-south

conductors on the north side of the North Porcupine River,

flight line 2300/2N flies directly over and along one of these

that has been located by the ground surveys. To the west on line

2280N another structure is traced. The intensity of the response

is due to the transmitter and receiver both on the same conductor

at the same time, effectively causing a short circuiting of the

signal. Though these conductors respond on 9 channels they are

not identified as anomalies. It is possible a third parallel

structure to the east between flight lines 2320/2N and 2330S is

responsible for the strong but wandering response since neither

line is close enough to resolve the signal. These three weak

conductors north of the river are thought to be tensional

fractures radiating from an intrusive structure located along and

to the south of the North Porcupine River.

The intrusive structure is identifiable by the presence of

flanking magnetic highs. These are associated with potassic

alteration halos including the presence of iron oxides. The

magnetic low over the structure is associated with a capping

alteration indicated by quartz carbonate veins and often

tourmaline epidote type mineralization. These patterns are

readily identified from both terraquests and Geotems derivative

studies of the magnetic field and the ground magnetic survey.

GEOPHYSICAL EVALUATION (Continued)

The Geotem survey does not identify a conductor over this

proposed intrusive structure but just west of the property along

the same trend on flight line 2260N fiducle 404210, a 12 channel

response, anomaly S is identified. Terraquest identified but one

conductor associated with the intrusive structure. The ground

survey identified several conductive structures but due to the

wide grid spacing it was impossible to identify their

orientation. As a result the conductors in the intrusive

structure are indicated as two amorphous zones.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The interesting structure on this property is along the North

Porcupine River and the areas directly south of it. It is marked

by a magnetic depression coincident with several short

conductors. Lateral to this zone are magnetically high shoulders

and identified to the north are lateral radiating tensional

fractures.

A first step before drilling can be considered is the definition

of the internal components of this structure. To do this a new

grid should be run using line 1+87.5 S as baseline. Picket lines

should be run both north and south from this baseline a minimum

of 200 meters with stations marked every 10 meters. These lines

should be spaced a maximum of 50 meters apart but ideally on 25

meter or closer centers. Most of this area has been logged so

line cutting is not difficult.

This new grid should be read using both magnetometer and VLF EM

tuned to Cutler, Maine. All four components of the VLF field

should also be measured, these including: field strength/ dip

angle quadrature, and reverse quadrature. Frazer filtering the

dip angle component is not necessary as it obscures the half

cross overs that sometimes identify lateral conductive

structures. Only when the central source of this structure is

identified should horizontal loop EM techniques be used for the

purpose of depth sounding this structure.

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Bryan Thomas Muloin of Fort St James, British Columbia,certify that:

1. I am a consulting geologist, resident of the ruralmunicipality of Fort St James, British Columbia, and can be contacted through post office Box 1312, VOJ 3AO, or phone: (604) 996 2253.

2. I am a graduate of Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, with the degrees of Bachelor of Science from the faculty of Applied Science, 1971, and Bachelor of Education from McArthur College of Education 1972.

3. I have been actively practicing my profession since 1970.

4. My report, dated December 1988, is the result of bothphysical examination and the study of the available surveys covering the Salo claim group, ^J^JJK TOWNSHIPOntario.

5. My involvement with this property is a partner of the prospector Arvo J Salo.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ontario Geological Survey 1980 - Geological Compilation Series Hoyle Township, Preliminary Map P2088 Scale 1:15,840

Geological Survey of Canada 1947 - Aeromagnetic survey, by the Dominion Gulf Company for the Geological Survey of Canada. Sheet 298G scale 1:63,360

1969 - Aeromagnetic survey for the Geological Survey of Canada, Map 20,014G at a scale 1:25,000

Terraquest 1986 - Magnetic and Electromagnetic surveys performed by Terraquest for Arvo Salo, File T-3063, Resident Geologists' Files, Ontario Geological Survey, Timmins

Consolidated Manitoba Mines Ltd 1969 - Very Low Frequency (VLF) EM and ground magnetometer surveys. File T-1316 Resident Geologists' Files, Ontario Geological Survey, Timmins

Bryan T Muloin 1987 - Ground geophysical surveys performed by Bryan T Muloin for Arvo Salo, File T-3063, Resident Geologists' Files, Ontario Geological Survey, Timmins

Ontario Gelogical Survey 1988 - Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Survey, Timmins Area, Wark Township, Districts of Cochrane and Timiskaming Ontario; by Geoterrex Limited, for Ontario Geological Survey. Geophysical/Geochemical Series Map 81063 Scale 1:20,000. Survey and compilation from March 1987 to October 1987.

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Fryer BJ, Kerrich R, Hutchinson RW, Peirce MG, and Rogers DS 1979,Archean precious-metal hydrothermal systems, Dome Mine, Abitibi Greenstone Belt I. Patterns of alteration and metal distribution. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 16, pp 421 439.

Kerrich R and Fryer BJ 1979 - Archean precious-metal hydrothermal systems. Dome Mine, Abitibi Greenstone Belt II REE and oxygen isotope relations. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 16 pp 440 458.

LJ Kornik, PH McGrath r MT Holroyd and PJ Hood 1975 - Evaluation of high resolution aeromagnetic survey data over a test range in the Timmins Area Ontario. GSC Report of Activities Part B paper 75-1B, 23-39.

McNeil AM and Kerrich R 1986 - Archean lamprophyre dykes and gold mineralization, Matheson, Ontario: The conjunction of LILE- enriched magmas, deep crustal structures and Gold concentration, Can J Earth Science 23, 324 343.

Berry LG 1939 - Geology of the Bigwater Lake Area. Ontario Dept. of Mines Annual. Report, Vo. XLVIII Part XII.

Bright EG 1970 - Pamour Sheet {Preliminary Map) Scale 1:126,720, Ontario Geological Survey Map P000139.

Kirwan JL 1968 - Geology of the Precambrian of the Porcupine Area. PhD thesis, University of London. This includes an airborne geophysical survey by the Barringer INPUT system at a scale of l inch equals 1/2 mike, from surveys made in 1964.

ntario 42A11NE8798 3 .12223 WARK

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

900

Mining Lands Section 3rd Floor, 880 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5S 1Z8

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

May 31, 1989 File: 2.12222

Arvo J. Salo General Delivery Vi rginiatown, Ontario POK 1X0

Dear Sir:

Re: Consultant's Report on Mining Claims P 756531 et al in Wark Township.

ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEYASSESSMENT FILES

OFFICE

JUN 5 1989

RECEIVED

The assessment credits as were recorded on the enclosed Report of Work have been approved.

However, it is considered that the author of the report is not experienced or qualified to write technical interpretation reports on Airborne Geophysics.

The approval of this submission should not be considered a precedent. Future submissions of this nature should have the interpretation prepared by someone qualified to do so.

Yours sincerely,

r^- ^^^W,*tf. towan ^"~^ Provincial Manager, Mining Lands Mines S Minerals Division

ONTARIO GEOLOGICAL SURVEYASSESSMENT FILES

OFFICE

.nil 05 15

RECEIVED

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario #W8906-103

Ministry otNorthern Developmentand Mines

Technical Assessment Work Credits

JntarioMay 31, 1989

File

2.1MJnlno Record*

2222'i Report of

03

Recorded Holder

ARVO J. SALOTownthlp or Area

WARK TOWNSHIPTyp* of wrvey and number of

Assessment dayi credit par diim Mining Claims AsutMdGeophysical

Electromagnetic.

Magnetometer.

Radiometric.—

Induced polarization.

Other.————————

.days

.days

. dayt

.days

-days

$4,980.00 spent on a Consultant's Report on Mining Claims:

P 878501 -02 756530 to 33 incl.

Section 77 (19) Se* "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological ___________________ day*

Geochemical —————.—————-.———.day*

Man days [~1 Airborn* [~!

Special provision (~| Ground f~i

f~l Credits have been reduced because of partial l coverage of claims.

l f~1 Credits have been reduced because of corrections 10 work dates and figures of applicant.

332 days credit allowed which may be grouped in accordance with Section 76(6) of the Mining Act.

Special crcdiu under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims(~| not sufficiently covered by th* survey inefficient uchnical data filed

The Mming Recorder may reduce the above crcditi if necessary in oroVr that the total number of approved asseftment days recorded on each claim does not exceed Hie maximum allowed as fo'lowi: Ceophyiicil-60: Ceologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(191 '60.

tie (8VIJ)

Please type or print. If number of mining claims traverspd exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Only days credits calculated in tlin "Expenditures" section may bc entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below.

Ministry ofDevelopment

and Mines

Report of WorkDOCUMENT No(Geophysical, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditui

f32-.-.J?JL#?f.7~{te* 77-xf/ .*

^ /s. /v 4; A ^ c.VjA&JAs/rf.TP

S S1 g

Na'me and Address of Author (of Geo-Techn^c/il report)por ~ *

o tt ^ 6Cre'ditf Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

FFor caeusing the same grid:

Enter

MINING LANDSMan Days

Complete reverse side

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

*^- Radiornetric

- Other

Geological

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisionscredits do not apply (o Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

' Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

ological

TTeochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

f l Sal. T4*!7j 77- PPerformed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may 1)0 apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of (Joys credits por claitri selected in columns nt right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

/?

Number

^ 7S'5^/^7^^Z

7r6nT

7r^u.

. . . .

Expend. Days Cr.

^)

feJt^

14^vO

— — -

- - - —

. .... —— .

Mining ClaimPrefix

RE(

FE

Number

-- ---- - —— -—

CORDED

3 2 k 1989

Expend. Days Cr.

•- - -

---- -

Total ruirnbor of mining . claims covcicd by this f leport of work. w-^

RocorcliHl Holder or Aljcnt (Siqnnjurcl

CortHication VoiifyjMg-Rc'oorrTif Work

^

For Office Use OnlyTota) Days C'.[D,T^ Recorded Recorded

330 ate Approved H

Mining Roco

Br.inch Dtntcioi

^/S&^i

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the (nets set fonh in the Report o) Woik annexed hnrin, h.ivinn pmloinifd lin- wo i k

or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed icpoit is true.

Name and Postal Address of Peson Certifyingnd Postal Address of Peys/7 si,/^ , s

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

1988-04-15

Mr. Arvo J. Salo, General Delivery, Prince George, British Columbia, V2L 4R8

Dear Sir,

After receiving the maps detailing your properties we have selected some flight lines from which we have made copies of the analog data traces. Your properties in HOYLE TWSP are covered by flight lines 2560N - 2640N and your properties in WARK TWSP are covered by flight lines 2260N - 2340N. The information can be verified by viewing the 1:20 000 scale maps 81063 and 81072.

WARK TWSP HOYLE TWSP

Line

2260 2270/3N

2290/2S

23O 2320/2N 2330 2340

FID*

40400417565431400443400'496298"513547531000544200557400

Line

25602570258

262026302640

FID*

573000586800599400613200625200619600651600265200280200

* The nearest printed FID, of the 1:20 000 scale maps, from your properties were found.

The copies of the analogs contain two sheets illustrating the legend, common to all traces used. Due to the photocopying technique used the horizontal and vertical scales have been altered. The vertical scales are expressed for each of the sixteen channels in units per cm and the horizontal scale was expressed as 1:30 000 or l cm equals 300 m. The original traces were drawn on a cm gridded background. This gridded background is shown on the photo copied traces. Therefore, the scale expressed as units per cm are units per large division on the copies (see first sheet of legend).

\

Page 2 1988-04-15 A.J. Salo

Each photocopy has the corresponding line number and township recorded on the back of the sheet. Using the fids it should be a simple matter to locate your properties. It should be noted that the entire Timmins survey can be viewed via microfiche at the nearest resident geologist's office.

Yours truly,

R.B. Barlow,Chief,Geophysics/Geochemistry Section,Ontario Geological Survey,Ministry of Northern Development and Mines,708-77 Grenville Street,Toronto, Ontario,M7A 1W4

Tel: (416) 965-1697

jBatttUitiiin

.i;::;.-•-

: i

i -4- ..,...... :......... ..i... ... ..i......;......,.

•t

i . .. ,. . ..i. ,.:., ,. . '

iBfflflfflHmlHHflfflllmfliH^m^^^^BnHIHIHHHHHHIHI

.i..i

"T--

' . ' ' j .... . .. . . . .: .. ,

i : ! 'L-r- 'l!; ,.......|....... .... ........,

: i

i ; ! i ' - i . : . , . , i ...i. .. . . .i. . . . ., ...i,., j. . . . .. , . :.. . :.... . - '

21! l*

... i

..i.......i..,. ! ,..!. . ...... Jonyp:w..8siqu |AI3 .9.1. .M31039 S l

.039 Vli 039 21 033.

uaawirauaBiaiiBSiraisiw^ iiHioumiMMmiHmiS UHHMUttmillMHIW•*m**l*W**MWBI*JSî^ iMM'lilliliS85iiiu5^^ 1™™™™,,,,,,,,.,,,™,,.,,™™^t^^^Ml^^^^^^MîMMMM^^^M^Mtn^^Z^B^SS^S^B^^^tliMIMMMniiMM^MniM^MIlMttMnifitlM^MMMilitllinilliMtlinitMflliniflMltinillinilllttlll Hi irm *l**ralBI*M^*MBIIgg*MitHn**l**BIBHPft^.^*CTtaBm'ilf fililBBUl^^ wnoniHMivHpHniMHinîHiuiHtHiHnHiniwiipuitiniiMfiMli v f".t~ **IM 111^1118111*1^*1^*11^11^*10111^11^^*11^1^*111010^^0^11*^^1^1*1^*1^^*1^^*^*^1^18

.......................^..........,' i i i ' i i .....,....,...:.........s .

i|ttttaBiintiigMitfii|i|iBHiB^p|IlHiBIIBIUIIPfllttilffillfflMMtM MttiBttnMHiHVlnlf Wnn^nPWVIQRw Hln Din UVHKiTtNBi DIM HIM Kin HHf Hilt HlflMHtMl HiliHiiiliWHHi^^HinHimHMHWMNHBMH^Hii^^Q^aimmmmmmwmmmmwmmmwmmm&mwwffllCTMHifllffiiitHffnHMtfflMIIHIHffllMI^I^™i8Kll)fl^PWuiroffipPwBfflffl^P!j]|l!llllllP^ ''

I.Sj....ilot'2 1^3f4 l 5 16

GEOTEM EM Phahnei 7 ! GEdf^'EMljChQhrier'B! GEOTEM "EM pahnet'S ; GEOTEM EM Channel GEOTEM EM Channel GEOTEM EM Channel EM noise monitor

0

?.

400iO 40oiO400;o400,0 4OO.O 400.0 30.0

ppm. X cm ppm j cm ppm X' 'cm ppm X cmppm X cm ppm X cm mv X cm

COMRILED BY GEOTERREX LIMITED

;....j—..-..j_!-uJ—:_-J_j-:i - : .;- •.i-: |.;-.':.

m ir

MH

iHB

Hffl M

^tj

::.. "

'•k":-

.:

,....

.:i :;

:

. .::

...,

. .

. .-:.-

::'

li

m in3RHF jjSjjfjf

•JlttiiiffiilnL

lllllllllllfJullllllilllflMS

.iirriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiHiiiniiHiiiiiHiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiiiii! [llll!!!llP]lilll!llil!ll!li!l!illl!!iiy!l!llli!fliilll|]!Pllll!llllllllll]!!!iiiiiiiieiiiniieiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitttiiyiiyiiiiiiiiiiiiuiiimffliiiiiiiiiiniifii

KID

DT

OW

NS

HIP

Z

P

5*

?

3DJ"

P b

1 i

iS

"

3*

E; c

H 1-5

S S

So

ci

^

m

3,1

2 5

1/1 9

5c

3 ^

2 d o

oD

O

H

m

B 5 3

ra Q 0

O O) re

o 00

ro

"D

33

O

C/)

O) rn ro H

O CO x

^ V

^ .

v-;

s

/

X

1 1'

N\

I | 1

1 t l |

, "' i

f '

zr

E

-

<

:

dIH

SN

MO

i

S ^ '•U

o It

in

ni

'U H r-t s: ID

"1

T 'D

U)

Of

1 ( K! "

CD

00

CD

I@Minist

ry of

Natural

Resources HI

y j

W5!

(t) ^

co 3

^ MDevelopm

ent

s *

0;-

u*H

3

^C

3o ^

o z

—

^ ^

sO

a

73

z S

x

-]^

xxô^S

g

^^

*

73

2

O

33 C3

W O Z

m —4 ~o n -^

1

Co

(•^M

ifJii

Jl^g

Sgy

ISsg

S1 )

,

" "~

-

1

NV

M09 i

"

w

w

Cft

M

M

3) ff

—

O

Z

M

H

' r

- o

o

01

j*

—

01

Oo

'n >

1

0

r

^

0

i"

O

M

5- S

0t

^

O 0

8 0

3 * o JT 5' o

if "S o o Si M O g o ,I

2 3o -4 M

O O

Ik S s 3 ? i

E S 9 "s " :

f.

tn

O

35

O

r~

Jr-

z

Or-y?

ma

7 30

m

H

O

^

j: 0

o o

^M

T

"

"'

* i

( )

* J L

' f

1 i

' 11

r"

' .

, '

'

;-i

; j

On*

^

sis

?O

JO

I?G

H

^

O '

Hm

m

"1 m

O•^ c*

5

S|c

i

i i

i i

rn w

k

- l

, .

.

n:*

r^r.

rô^

- n

*

\3 ®

\"

<t

4

r-

' -o

m

J)

:

: >

.

. H

z ^

:j ^

j; n

D in

rt

i '

' '

( )

I

Q

? i

V V

w i 1

?4 'i s

z* 0

o

-' w

r

H T3 m

O D

O

f)

C m

7. H

^ z

^

-* 0

cir~

:z

r~

Z

I

i J

O

H

I

i i i

i i

iii;

D li

n D

o a

to < l

a 01 T)

O

CO p

o m O ra a ?* r- r '., O en

< m

m

w*

O

T1

ir

33 O

J ^

——

—

-K

1/1

——

—

S

S

T

O

U

( fj

-'

^

-;1

FI f71

;:, f-'-

r-

< V *- iî

"^

?

CZ 1

3D

^^

Oi

—

l*

0

z

P

n-

3o

r. :.

--

rr' 7*

i" '

-jf

(J-

*-

* 11

n

n

J" '

f)

O

"Jo

e ^

3 z

j"S

o s

c : o1 c i

- P

r

" V.

~

; n

F

C

v

-^

C

3 "

tO

"~

~*

3)

JT

:..

0

O

<

- '

-D

-* ^

m [

^ "3

l' ^

o n

'•n S > K

n J

*^

r"

j; - m

TJ

VI

I

HIQHVv A1!

OTHER

R: 1*

I-C

3 -'

l/i

'"l t] ( )

in

O

S '

H

rn 0

f- H

1*) f '

1 l

i ^

i' !

1 \

! U lii 1

1'

r— m

en m r ^ O

TERRAQUfSTLTD

AND VLF-EM53120 SURVEY

INTERPRETATI

LEGEND

CONTACT

FAULT

PROPERTIY BOUNDAR

VLF-EMCONDUCTOR

FLIGHT LINES NOT SHOWN

LITHOLOGYPIO26986

DIABASE DYKE

^GABBROI

GREYWA&KE v ^ '

42A11NE0798 2.12222 WARK

l ARVO J. SALO-NTS 42 A SCALE l to 5,000

AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDY

(M4IT565 ..287198

/+87SS- /f

TOTAL FIELDMAGNETOMETER

SURVEY INSTRUMENT'

SCINTREX MP2 CONTOUR INTERVAL'

5 ff (gammas) 35*

READINGS' evejy 25 meterson lines" J25 meters apart

OPERATOR'BRYAN T MULOIN

NTS 42 All SCALE l to 5,000ARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDY

.287000

'/

/

\

230

ARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY

/

496100

STRUCTURALINTERPRETATION

FROM GROUNDSURVEYS

LEGEND

CON DUCTIVE

B A

INDUCTIVE ZONES

ROCK UNITS- MORE MAFIC- LESJS MAFIC

CONTACT

NTERPRETERBRJAN'f MULOIN

/

53IIOO

\NTS 42 All SCALE l to 5,000


K ALTERATION

CORE ZONE OFINTRUSIVE STRUCTURELOW MAG. WITH E,M. CONDUCTORS^

SILICA. CARBONATE FLOODTNG

K ALTERATIONHIGH MAG. RESPONSEIRON OXIDE 8POTASH ENRICHED ZONE

.443900-—^-- xx

STRUCTURALINTERPRETATIONFROM GEOTEMSURVEY ET AL.

INTERPRETER' lBRYAN T MULOIN

42AMNEE798 2.12222

SCALE l to 5,000NTS 42 AllARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDY

AIRBORNE MAGNE SURVEY

^LEVATION- 100 M

FLitSHSPACED- lOOMETERS

CONTOURS10 G AMMAS 2 GAMMAS

42M1NEB/9B 2.12222

\_______ARVO J. S*\LO- WARK PROPERTYNTS 42 All SCALE l to 5,000


COMPUTED VERTI MAGNETIC

AIRBO SURVEY

CONTOURS:0-1 GAMMAS

O-025 GAMMASO-O05 GAMMAS

SCALE l to 5,000 Y DETAIL STUDY

NTS 4 2 A AIRBORNE E LECTROMAGNETICAKVU J. bALU-WAKK

TOTAL INTENSITY MAGNETIC SURVEY

from GEOTEM SURVEY

l l lARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY

SCALE l to 5,000 'AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDY

0-7,2

CHANNEL l at 350 u sec from GEOTEM SURVEY

EM SENSOR^ALTITUDE' 40mel6rs CONTOUR INTERVAL 0

NTS 42 A SCALE l to 5,000ARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDY

(M4I7565 -287198

2nd VERTICAL D DERIVATIVE O F

MAGNETICSfrom GEOTEM

SURVEY E LEVATION' 120 meters

CONTOURS' -400,f-200 0,200,409,800 in nt/km 2

NTS 42 A SCALE l to 5,000AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDYARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY

4+400

TERRAQUESTLTD

ELEVATION -

SEPERATION-IOOMETERS

FIELD STRENGTH CONTOURS

no INTERVAL 2 0Xo

QUADRATURE

300

VLF E.M. FIELD STRENGTH SURVEY

INSTRUMENT'CR^NE RADEM

CONTOURS 1VLF Transmitter

2 '/o INTERVALNAA Cutler

24.0 kHz

Azimuth l I5 0 -LOPERATOR 1

BRYAN T. M U LOIN

NTS 42 A SCALE l to 5,000

ARVO J. SALO-WARK PROPERTY AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY DETAIL STUDY

A PROP EVALUATION EXPANDING ON THE RESULTS · PDF fileOntario Geological Survey Compilation...

Documents

Transcript of A PROP EVALUATION EXPANDING ON THE RESULTS · PDF fileOntario Geological Survey Compilation...