A process-based guide to data collection in plant health
-
Upload
luigi-ponti -
Category
Presentations & Public Speaking
-
view
34 -
download
2
Transcript of A process-based guide to data collection in plant health
A process-based guide to
data collection in plant health
Luigi Ponti
utagri.enea.it
EFSA, Parma
Wed 2 April 2014
A process-based approach is key
to managing pests effectively
Gutierrez & Ponti 2013
Cost of
management
(millions of US
dollars)
Biological information available
The biology matters
A process-based guide to
data collection in plant health
Why the biology matters
North American examples
A process-based approach
Physiological analogies
Work in progress
Tuta absoluta
A process-based guide to
data collection in plant health
Why the biology matters
North American examples
A process-based approach
Physiological analogies
Work in progress
Tuta absoluta
Pink bollworm cost 300 million $, yet in the Central
Valley of California weather is the limiting factor
Gutierrez & Ponti 2013a
Introduced
to California
in the late 60s
Mediterranean fruit fly cost >450 million $ as
threat to California agriculture was overestimated
Gutierrez & Ponti 2013a
First detected
in California
in 1975
Medfly
pupae
(103)
Large-scale monitoring and eradication since 1975
with no knowledge of the potential distribution
Gutierrez & Ponti 2011
Planned eradication (worth 100 million $) for
light brown apple moth was abandoned
Gutierrez & Ponti 2013a
USDA: risk of establishment
(Fowler et al. 2009)
First detected
in California
in 2007
A process-based guide to
data collection in plant health
Why the biology matters
North American examples
A process-based approach
Physiological analogies
Work in progress
Tuta absoluta
The regional pest status of species is affected by
many factors difficult to separate and quantify
Abiotic
(x,y) Coordinates
Biotic
Geography Organic matter, soil type, topography, etc.
Weather data
Solar radiation, temperature, rainfall, etc.
Models
Natural enemies Pests Plants
H2O and N
Geographic scale
Physiological analogy among trophic
levels is a powerful conceptual tool
Purves et al. 2013
Processes like predation play
by similar rules in all ecosystems
All organisms are consumers with common
pattern of resource acquisition and allocation
Respiration
costs
r(.)
Egesta
Assimilated
food
Growth or
reproduction
Conversion
costs
(1 - )
(1 - )
Demand
Hunger
Food in gut
Supply
Same model can be used in all trophic levels,
each level supplies resource to the next
Sun
Plant
Growth
Respiration
Wastage
Reproduction
Minerals,
CO2, H2O Herbivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Carnivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Same model can be used in all trophic levels,
each level supplies resource to the next
Sun
Plant
Growth
Respiration
Wastage
Reproduction
Minerals,
CO2, H2O Herbivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Carnivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Same model can be used in all trophic levels,
each level supplies resource to the next
Sun
Plant
Growth
Respiration
Wastage
Reproduction
Minerals,
CO2, H2O Herbivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Carnivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Same model can be used in all trophic levels,
each level supplies resource to the next
Sun
Plant
Growth
Respiration
Wastage
Reproduction
Minerals,
CO2, H2O Herbivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Carnivore
Gr.
Resp.
Egestion
Repr.
Same model describes species biology across
trophic levels including the economy of humans
Ponti et al. 2014
growth
respiration
wastagereproduction
consumption
water, minerals, CO2
respiration
growth
reproductionegestion
consumption
overhead
farmer
savings
profitwastage
supplies
x $
olive olive fly natural enemies
farmer
SUN
SOURCE
PRODUCTIO
N
CONSUM
PTION
BIOLOGICAL
ECONOMIC
BIOLOGICAL
ECONOMIC
taxes
Sub-models of biological process
are the same for all trophic levels
Physiologically based modeling
PBDM
Sub-models of biological process
are the same for all trophic levels
Physiologically based modeling
PBDM
Based on physiological analogies
Sub-models of biological process
are the same for all trophic levels
Physiologically based modeling
PBDM
Based on physiological analogies
Same process sub-models
Temperature
1 / days
Rate of development
Temperature
1 / days
Scalar for
developmental
time
Nutrition
1
Rate of development Effect of nutrition
Temperature
1 / days
Scalar for
developmental
time
Nutrition
1
Rate of development Effect of nutrition
Eggs
per female
per day
Age
Age-specific
fecundity
Temperature
1 / days
Scalar for
developmental
time
Nutrition
1
Rate of development Effect of nutrition
Eggs
per female
per day
Age
Scalar for
eggs per
female
Temperature
Age-specific
fecundity
T effect on fecundity 1
Temperature
1 / days
Scalar for
developmental
time
Nutrition
1
Rate of development Effect of nutrition
Temperature
Proportion
dying per day
T effect on mortality
Eggs
per female
per day
Age
Scalar for
eggs per
female
Temperature
Age-specific
fecundity
T effect on fecundity 1
Temperature
1 / days
Scalar for
developmental
time
Nutrition
1
Rate of development Effect of nutrition
Day length
Proportion
diapause
per day
Temperature
Proportion
dying per day
T effect on mortality Diapause
induction
Eggs
per female
per day
Age
Scalar for
eggs per
female
Temperature
Age-specific
fecundity
T effect on fecundity 1
1( )t )(2 t i t( ) k t( )
N1(t) x0(t) y(t) N2(t) Ni(t) Nk(t)
Birth
Death
…
2 ( )r t1( )ir t
1( )kr t1( )r t
Population dynamics adds more realism (and density)
via age structure, distributed delay, and attrition
k = 30
k = 10
k = 5
k = 1
Developmental time
Frequency
of maturation
times
GIS integration occurs at the population level,
factors are modeled on a per-capita basis
x,y
Individual
Population
Area
Region
Biology
Geographic distribution
Gutierrez, Ponti & Gilioli 2010
A process-based guide to
data collection in plant health
Why the biology matters
North American examples
A process-based approach
Physiological analogies
Work in progress
Tuta absoluta
PBDM clearly identifies data gaps in the biology
of T. absoluta and guides data collection
Ponti et al. submitted
As of Nov 2013
A process-based guide to
data collection in plant health
Luigi Ponti1,2, Gianni Gilioli2,3,
Antonio Biondi4, Nicolas Desneux4,
Andrew Paul Gutierrez2,5
1 Laboratorio Gestione Sostenibile degli Agro-ecosistemi (UTAGRI-ECO), Agenzia
nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA),
Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Roma, Italy, [email protected]
2 Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems Global, Kensington, CA
94707-1035, USA, http://casasglobal.org/
3 DMMT, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123 Brescia, Italy
4 French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), UMR1355-ISA, 400 Route des
Chappes, 06903 Sophia-Antipolis, France
5 College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, USA
Joint EFSA‐EPPO Workshop “Data collection and information sharing in plant health”, EFSA premises, Parma, 1‐2‐3 April 2014