A Functional Study of Lexical Conversion within Modern ...
Transcript of A Functional Study of Lexical Conversion within Modern ...
International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 7, No. 6; 2017 ISSN 1923-869X E-ISSN 1923-8703
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
138
A Functional Study of Lexical Conversion within Modern Chinese Nominal Group
Weiwei Zhang1 & Manliang Li1
1 Foreign Languages College, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China 1 Correspondence: Manliang Li, Foreign Languages College, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Tel: 86-0471-499-6235. E-mail: [email protected]
Received: July 11, 2017 Accepted: August 15, 2017 Online Published: September 25, 2017
doi:10.5539/ijel.v7n6p138 URL: http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n6p138
Abstract
The phenomenon of lexical conversion within modern Chinese nominal group is often presented in ancient Chinese grammar. For many years, there have been earnest discussions in China about how we can better study the Chinese nominal group from alternative dimensions, e.g. cognition, pragmatics, multi-category words, word-class shift as well as functional perspective, but few pay attention to the lexical conversion from perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). As the SFL itself is “a problem-oriented theory” (Huang, 2006), to apply this theory to explain some certain language phenomena merits serious consideration. This paper is based on the Cardiff Grammar, an important model of SFL and the purpose is to explore the semantic and syntactic function in lexical conversion within modern Chinese nominal group. Through the contrastive study in light of the Cardiff Grammar, the Chinese nominal group can be functionally used as a Main Verb, a Main Verb Extension (MEx) and a prepositional group (pgp).
Keywords: Systemic Functional Linguistics, the Cardiff Grammar, modern Chinese nominal group, lexical conversion, Main Verb, Main Verb Extension, prepositional group
1. Introduction
Halliday (1988) has put forward that “we live in an age of growth, in which every day more and more things come into our lives; and things, and all their parts, need names. So more and more words come in with them- new words, or new ways of exploiting, embellishing and combining the old ones; and in this way the balance is maintained”. Not only do the things need new names, but also the functions of some certain words are changing, the Chinese nouns for instance. For years, the lexical conversion of Chinese nominal group has drawn public attention of linguists. Most Chinese scholars study Chinese nominal group from the point of cognition (such as Shen, 2010; Gao, 2008), and some from the aspect of pragmatics (such as Gao & Xu, 2000); some hold that the certain Chinese characters are multi-category words, normally referring to nouns and verbs (such as Liu et al., 2004, pp. 168-170; Hu, 2006; Lv, 1979, p. 36); some regard the lexical conversion as a word-class shift (such as Wang, 1989), and others study from the functional perspective (such as Zhang & Fang, 1996, pp. 203-217; He & Hong, 2014). However, there are limited studies about the lexical conversion of Chinese nominal group from the perspective of SFL, precisely the Cardiff Grammar, a model of SFL. The discussion is mainly carried out from two fields: nominal group used as the Main Verb (sometimes the Main Verb Extension) and as the preposition. Interestingly, it is not proper to use the term “verb”, “preposition” or “adjective”, because these is no word class in the Cardiff Grammar. Instead, we should re-express: nominal group used as the Main Verb (sometimes used as the MEx) and as the prepositional group.
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1 Categories of the Cardiff Grammar
The Cardiff Grammar, as one of the two most important models of SFL (the other is the Sydney model), is a “function-oriented, multifunction-oriented and meaning-oriented linguistics” (Huang, 2007). Fawcett, the founder of the Cardiff Grammar, attributes the fundamental categories in the theory to class of UNIT, ELEMENT of structure, PLACE and ITEM, which can be illustrated by Figure 1 below:
ijel.ccsenet.
In Figure provides aunderstandgroup” andGrammar”term: ITEMitem can b
For the subincongruenthe semanbetween thHowever, See Figure
2.1.1 Elem
Elements element), mand materi(sd), ordin(pd), reprequalifier (q
.org
1, we find tha convincing ading the natured gets the Ma” (He & ZhangM. Item includ
be directly dem
bject of this pance. Fawcett (
ntics (which whe “event” andan event can
e 2 below:
Figure 2. The
ments of the No
of a typical nmodifier (m foial), determine
native determinesentational dq for short, us
In
Figure
hat the units wargument that e of English syain Verb altereg, 2008, pp. 5des both “wor
monstrated at th
aper is about “2000, p. 210) ill in turn be md the “clause”be incongruen
e relationship
ominal Group
nominal groupor short, includer (d for short,ner (od), quaneterminer (rd)sually the post
nternational Jou
e 1. The catego
within the Card“the concept oyntax rather thd into the leve6-69). In the C
rd” (in its tradihe level of form
“lexical convermentions that mapped onto a
” is said to be ntly realized b
of logical form
(ngp)
p in the Cardiding the mean, which can be
ntifying determ), typic determtmodifier plac
urnal of English
139
ories of the Ca
diff Grammarof “verbal grohan aid”. Thereel of element, Cardiff Grammitional sense) m.
rsion”, a relevaif an event in a clause in thecongruently-y a nominal g
m to semantics
iff Grammar aning of affective divided into
miner (qd), fracminer (td), quced behind the
Linguistics
ardiff Grammar
r exclude verbup” in the Sydefore, he simpwhich is also
mar, there is nand “morphem
ant but importthe belief syste syntax at thea term introdu
group, i.e., wh
and syntax (F
are head (h fove, dimension,deictic determctionative dete
ualifier-introdue head). In add
r
bal group. Fawdney Grammaly cancels the
o “a simplificao word class b
me” (Fawcett,
ant concept shtem is mappede level of formuced by Halliden “nominaliz
Fawcett, 2000,
or short, whic, epithet, age,
miner (dd), superminer (fd), pucing determindition, there is
Vol. 7, No. 6;
wcett (2008, par is a hindran
concept of “vation of the Sybut provides a2000, p. 226)
hould be introdd onto a situatim), the relationday (1970, p. zation” takes p
p. 210)
ch is an obligcolour, provenerlative determ
partitive determner (qid), etc.)s also an impo
2017
. 49) ce to erbal
ydney a new , and
duced: on in nship 149).
place.
atory nance miner miner ) and ortant
ijel.ccsenet.
relationshi
Key. ngp= noqd= quantify
Usually, aforthcominBlack is S,on the moua ngp can number, it
2.1.2 Elem
A typical essential eis usually forthcomin
Key. pgp= pr
A pgp maymorning, Sas from beintelligent
2.2 The Re
Fawcett (2filling, exp
.org
ip-SELECTIO
Fig
ominal group; h= ying determiner; sd
a ngp can fill ng a). For inst, while the ngpuntain. Moreovfill a degree tis at amount (
ments of the Pr
prepositional element), comp
preceded theng a, Chapter 2
Figure
repositional group
y fill C, A, MEShe fell in loveehind the door
than her. Last
elationships be
2000, pp. 193-ponence and co
In
ON, which is re
gure 3. element
head; dd= deictic d= superlative dete
the Subject (Stance, in Last mp London is C.ver, a ngp can temper (dt) in (am) in a quant
epositional Gr
group in the pletive (cv for e preposition).21):
e 4. Elements o
p; pt= prepositiona
Ex, XEx and Se with me. It m. Besides, it cat, it may fill a q
etween the Cat
-272; 2008, pponflation:
nternational Jou
ealized by the e
ts of a standard
determiner; &= Lerminer; m= modi
S), Complememonth, Mr Bla A ngp can alsfill the elemena quality groutity group (qtg
roup (pgp)
Cardiff Gramshort) and pre. Most prepos
of a standard p
al temper; p= prep
S of a clause, may fill q in a n
an also fill scoquantity group
tegories within
p. 75-77) outlin
urnal of English
140
element SELE
d nominal grou
Linker; rd=represeifier; q= qualifier
ent (C) and ocack went to Loso fill the compnts of another
up (qlgp), suchgp), such as on
mmar includesepositional temsitions expres
prepositional g
position; cv=comp
such as I wantngp, such as thope (s) and finip finisher (qtf)
n the Cardiff G
nes four relatio
Linguistics
ECTOR (usuall
up (Fawcett, 2
entational determi
ccasionally Adondon, the ngppletive (cv) in ngp, such as r
h as two meterse hundred and
the elementsmper (pt for sho
s a meaning
group (Fawcett
pletive.
t to go to schoe girl in blue. isher (f) in a qin a qtgp, such
Grammar
onships in the
ly the word of)
008, p. 251)
ner; v=selector; p
djunct (A) of p last month isa prepositiona
rd, pd, fd, qd, mrs wide. When d twenty.
s of prepositioort, an occasioof minor rela
t, 2008, p. 251)
ool, The phoneRarely, it fills
qlgp, such as gh as more than
e Cardiff Gram
Vol. 7, No. 6;
):
pd= partitive determ
a clause (Faws A and the ngal group, such m, etc. Furthera ngp is a car
on (p for shoronal element, wationship (Faw
)
e rang at two ia cv in a pgp,
good at chess, n two student.
mmar: compon
2017
miner;
wcett, p Mr as up more,
rdinal
rt, an which wcett,
n the such more
ence,
ijel.ccsenet.
Key. “/|\”= congp=nominal
Here, Cl, Snominal grabove is p(such as thexpoundedby a unit (evening). Psuch as the去北京 (I
Key. Cl= Cla
In clause Wthe head “wthe head “Figure 6.
3. The Lex
3.1 Divisio
Different finstance, ispoken or is no fixedwith Gao (
3.2 The Ve
Here are so
.org
F
omponence; “—”=l group; h= head;
S, O, M, C androup). And ev
performed in Ehe nominal grd by items (su(such as the eParticularly, ite analysis of twI go to Beijing)
ause; S= Subject; O
Wo shi xueshenwo 我” (which
“xuesheng 学生
xical Convers
on of Chinese
from the Indo-t is odd to usewritten Chine
d meaning of o(1986), there is
erbalization of
ome examples
S n
(4) I
In
Figure 5. The b
= filling; “△”= exdd= deictic determ
d A are the elemvery word in thEnglish. So froroup this evench as the head
elements S, C t is worth menwo Chinese cl):
Figu
O=Operator; M=
ng 我是学生 h means I in E生” (which me
sion of Moder
Word Category
-European lange a noun as a Mse texts, no maone Chinese cs absolutely no
f Chinese Nomi
s:
S O Mngp
h
Ivy will wa
nternational Jou
basic relations
xponence; Cl= Claminer.
ments of the clhe clause Ivy wom Figure 5, wning is compod of nominal gand A are res
ntioning that thlauses Wo shi x
ure 6. The insta
Main Verb; C= Co
(I am a studenEnglish), and theans student in
rn Chinese No
y
guages, the woM or to use a natter in ancien
character. Thero word class w
inal Group
Cl
M C ngp
dd
ash her hair
urnal of English
141
ships of syntax
ause; S= Subject; O
lause, while ddwash her hair we can see: a uosed by dd thigroup is directlpectively fillehis kind of anxuesheng 我是
ance of two Ch
omplement; E=En
nt), the S is fillhe C is also filn English). Thi
ominal Group
ord category innoun to modifyt Chinese or mrefore, there is
within Chinese
A ngp
h dd
r this even
Linguistics
x (Fawcett, 200
O=Operator; M= M
d and h are thethis evening i
unit can be comis and h evenily expounded b
ed by the nominalysis can als是学生 (I am
hinese clauses
nder.
led by a nominled by a nominis is the same
p
n Chinese langfy another nounmodern Chiness no fixed wornotional word
is com
fil
is com h
expoing.
08, p. 75)
Main Verb; C= Co
e elements of ths respectively mposed of oneing); some eleby Ivy); other inal group Ivyo be applied ta student) and
nal group withnal group withto the second
guage is not ren in English, be. According trd class. Howed.
mposed of
islled by
mposed of
isounded by
Vol. 7, No. 6;
omplement; A= A
he group (exacitem. The ana
e or more elemements are direlements are f
y, her hair andto Chinese clad Wo qu Beijin
h only one elemh only one elemd Chinese clau
elatively fixedbut it is commto Ma (1898), ever, in accord
2017
Adjunct;
ctly a alysis ments rectly filled d this auses, g 我
ment- ment- use in
d. For on in there
dance
ijel.ccsenet.
(1) Wo ye
(2) Wo ye
(3) Ta dahead teach
In these tteacher in shunv 淑女illustrated
Key. ngp= noNote. You mmodifier plurelationship bthe third nomeach compos
However, Accordingthe M expdakuan 大in charge o
The M at process, rprocess. Wbut througFor examp
(4) Ivy gav
Fawcett (fexpansion is a MEx. elements Jwhole mea(1), lai 来plays a rol
.org
e lai shunv yix
e dakuan guo y
ang guo banzhher of only one
three examplecharge of a cl女) as far as thby the tree dia
Figure 7. A sy
ominal group; m=may be aware that us head. First of between each otheminal groups diffesed by two Chines
if the above g to Fawcett (fpress a whole 大款 and zhure
of a class), tho
the level of serelational procWhat is more, tgh the MEx- anple:
ve [Pro] him a
forthcoming bin its internal The MEx has
JOINTLY expraning except a
来 is the M of thle of “reified ev
In
xia 我也来淑女
yihui 我也大款
huren 他当过班e class )。Shen
es, shunv 淑女lass) are all noheir original magram (in Figu
ystemic functio
modifier; h= headall these three no
all, shunv 淑女 iser is modified, wher from the first onse characters, they
three exampleforthcoming a)process. From
en 主任 functough they are n
emantics is cacess, mental pthere is a spec
nd here it is pre
kiss [PrEx]. (F
b) also summastructures andthis name bec
ress a Process”dding a kiss. Ahis clause, andvent”:
nternational Jou
女一下 (Let m
款过一回 (I u
班主任,dan zn (2010).
女 (a kind ladouns (preciselymeaning conceure 7) in the fra
onal analysis o
d. ominal groups has composed by twhich means the quane in terms of the together express
es are attribute), a normal cla
m the comprehtion as M or Mnouns morphol
alled process, aprocess, envircial process caesented as a “t
Fawcett, forthc
arizes the chard meanings as icause “it functi” (Fawcett, 200Among the Chid shunv 淑女
urnal of English
142
me pretend to b
used to be a we
zhi zhuren le y
dy), dakuan 大y nominal grouerned. Thereforamework of th
f the Chinese n
ave two Chinese cwo elements shuality that this ladyeir internal structuone complete mea
ed to nominalause has just ohension of the MEx (to be a lalogically.
and Fawcett (fronmental proalled reified prthing” realized
coming b)
racteristic of tif it were a “thions as an “ex08, p. 184). Ininese clauses, is reasonably
Linguistics
be a lady too)。
ealthy man)。
yige ban 但只主
大款 (a wealthups and each ore, these three
he Cardiff Gram
nominal group
characters, but wiu 淑 (kind) and ny possesses is shuures. Despite that aning without mod
l groups, the one M, and som whole clauseady, to be a we
forthcoming aocess, influentrocess, which
d by a nominal
this kind of phing” (a “reifiextension” of the
other words, gwe find a simia MEx. Furthe
。
主任了一个班
hy person) anof which only e Chinese nommmar:
ps in example (
ith the first one anv 女 (lady) horiz淑 (kindness). Hdakuan 大款 as
dified relation.
clauses are grmetimes has a
e, we can inferealthy person
) regarded thetial process ais expressed “group” (Fawc
process: someted event”). Suce Main Verb (Mgave is not enoilar principle aermore, the ME
Vol. 7, No. 6;
班 (He used to
nd zhuren 主任has a head, ex
minal groups ca
(1) to (3)
analyzed by the fozontally. And the
However, the seconwell as zhuren 主
rammatically fa MEx which hr that shunv 淑and to be a tea
e process as: aand event- rel“not through thcett, forthcomin
times it can bch as “a kiss” iM), so that theough to expresat work. In exaEx shunv 淑女
2017
be a
任 (a xcept an be
orm of en, the nd and 主任 is
false. helps 淑女, acher
ction ating he M ng b).
be an in (4), e two ss the mple
女 also
ijel.ccsenet.
Key. Cl= ClaNote. In Figu(once) is also
Example (have introdbut here w
Here, we flanguage eChinese doall of whiChinese suexpressingis not the smeaning, bcommon san exclamthat althouclause hasChinese “ngroup in C
.org
Figu
ause; S= Subject; Mure 8, “wo 我” (I)o the A.
(2) is different duced a concep
we have to mak
Figu
find obvious dexpresses a moes not. In Chich have a pauch as “bu 不g the meaning same as O in Ebut Chinese dosense tells us th
matory sentenceugh an event is an obvious Mnominalization
Chinese, and ex
In
ure 8. A system
M= Main Verb; M) is the S; “ye 也”
from (1) at thpt of incongru
ke a change:
ure 9. A system
differences betwmeaning of pol
inese, “tense iast meaning” (” (a negation wof tense (past English. O in Eoes not. Chinehat “dakuan 大e in tradition) is incongruentlM, such as wn” word is direxample (2) can
nternational Jou
mic functional
MEx= Main Verb E” (too) is the A; “la
he level of formuence and a tab
mic functional a
ween the gramarity, tense anis specified by (Halliday & Eword) expressitense), etc. AlEnglish sentenese Grammar h大款” is considshould have aly realized by
was in His obsectly used as an be shown in a
urnal of English
143
analysis of ve
Extension; A= Adjai 来” (to be) is th
m, because it dble of the relati
analysis of ver
mmar of Chinend modality, it
three particlesEllis, 1951). Ning the meaninlthough these mnce can be movhas its own sydered to be an an M, and this
a nominal groservation on tan M, and thisa tree diagram
Linguistics
erbalization of
junct; E= Ender.he M; “shunv 淑女
does not have ionship of logi
rbalization of d
ese and the grat has the Opers added to the
Nonetheless, thng of polarity marked words ved to the beg
ystem to expresM. This is becM is a kind o
oup in the wathe bee’s behas is exactly the
m in the followi
example (1)
女” (a kind lady) i
an obvious Mical form to sem
dakuan 大款
ammar of Englrator (O) to “hverb: le 了, gu
here are someand the word “function as Oinning to exhibss an interrogacause a normalof nominalizatiay of nominaliavior was caree lexical conveing Figure 10:
Vol. 7, No. 6;
is the MEx; “yixia
. In section 2.1mantics and sy
lish. When Enhelp” the M, wuo 过, laizh 来e marked wor“guo 过” (use, the usage of bit an interrogative meaning.l clause (otherion. We also nzation, the En
reful. Howeverersion of a nom
2017
a 一下”
1, we yntax,
nglish while 来着, ds in ed to) them
gative . Yet, r than notice nglish r, the minal
ijel.ccsenet.
Key. Cl= Cla
Example (to be a tea
Key. Cl= Cla
3.3 Chines
In ancientadjectives.of time anclassify it (see Wang
In English
(1) A short
(2) The sch
(3) The loa
(4) This in
Such usagFawcett (2occurs whclass occur
In the Cardmore, due (but this grammar):
(5) Zanm
(6) Zanm
(7) Ta chan
.org
Figu
ause; S= Subject; M
(3) is more or cher in charge
Figu
ause; S= Subject; M
se Nominal Gr
t Chinese, the . Yet, modern
nd location), beas the noun u
g, 1962). In add
h, there are som
t circuit will re
hematic of a p
ad-bearing inte
nstrument shou
ge of the nouns2000, p. 264), hen a unit fills rs above it in t
diff Grammar,to the embedd
is an advanta:
men Beijing jian
men dianhua lia
ng shijian juzh
In
ure 10. A syste
M= Main Verb; O
less similar toe of only one cl
ure 11. A syste
M= Main Verb; O
roup Used as a
noun is frequChinese nounsecause it break
used as adverbdition, some ev
me nouns prece
esult when cur
ressure reduci
ernal walls are
uld always be k
s above usuallythe complexit
an element of the tree structu
a prepositionading and fillinage to demon
n 咱们北京见
anxi 咱们电话
hu zaiBeijing
nternational Jou
mic functional
O= Operator; A= A
o (2), with the lass:
mic functional
O= Operator; A= A
a Prepositional
uently used ass barely deal wks the gramma
b, such as illusven hold that t
eding verbs or
rrent-carrying w
ng valve is sho
e cast from rein
kept dust-free.
y expresses thty of languagethe same class
ure”.
al group typicang occurrence, nstrate some l
见 (See you in
话联系 (Let’s c
他长时间居住
urnal of English
144
l analysis of ve
Adjunct; E= Ender.
second “zhure
l analysis of ve
Adjunct; E= Ender
l Group
s Adjunct (A),with the noun aatical rules. Asstrated by Ma the noun canno
adjectives too
wires touch ea
own in Fig 4.
nforced concre
——Wang (1
he meaning of e is in part caus of unit- and a
ally contains athe internal stanguage phen
Beijing)。
connect by pho
住在北京 (He
Linguistics
erbalization of
.
en 主任” as a
erbalization of
; C= Complement
, with the formas A (except ths for this phen(1898). Some
ot be A at all (Z
o. For example
ach other.
ete, generally a
987).
time, place, mused by the realso, in a loose
a preposition (ptructure of lannomena that c
one)。
lived in Beijin
f example (2)
an M. “zhuren
f example (3)
t; ∑= Sentence.
m of a noun phe nouns exprenomenon, som
consider it asZhu, 1982, p. 1
:
about 6in in th
manner, degreeecursion of emer sense, when
p) and a complnguage can be cannot be cle
ng for a long tim
Vol. 7, No. 6;
主任” here m
preceding verbessing the meae Chinese ling
s a word-class 141).
ickness.
e, etc. Accordinmbedding, and n a unit of the
letive (cv). Whrelatively comared in tradit
me)。
2017
means
bs or aning guists
shift
ng to “this same
hat is mplex tional
ijel.ccsenet.
In (5) Zan北京(only(in) is cove
Key: Cl= Cla
Key. Cl= Cla
4. Conclus
This paperfunction ostudy furththat the SFto study Rsuccessorssometimesthe follow
.org
nmen Beijing jiy have a head) ert, and this is
ause; S= Subject; M
ause; S= Subject; M
sions
r is a new attof the phenomeher indicates thFL can be appl
Russian, Germas. Last but nots MEx (as illuing Figure 14:
In
ian 咱们北京is a cv of the the same with
Figure 12.
M= Main Verb; A
Figure 13. A s
M= Main Verb; A
tempt of functena in lexical hat SFL is a glied to other dian, French, Japt least, the studstrated in secti
nternational Jou
京见 (which meprepositional g
h (6) and (7):
. A systemic fu
A= Adjunct; E= En
systemic functi
= Adjunct; E= En
tional syntacticonversion w
general linguisifferent languapanese, and evdy shows thation 3.2) and e
urnal of English
145
eans See you igroup (zai Bei
unctional analy
nder.
ional analysis
nder.
ic analysis whwithin modern
tic theory, justages (at least Cven Sanskrit, et the Chinese nven a pgp, and
Linguistics
in Beijing), theijing 在北京
ysis of exampl
of example (6
hich is to explChinese nomit like Huang (
Chinese) besideetc., which givnominal groupd the research
e Chinese nomin Beijing) in
le (5)
6) and (7)
lore the semaninal group. On(2007) has putes English. Thves enough resp can be functfindings can b
Vol. 7, No. 6;
minal group Bewhich the p z
ntics and syntn the one handt forward. It pris makes it feaearch space fotionally used abe demonstrat
2017
eijingzai 在
tactic d, the roves asible or the as M, ed as
ijel.ccsenet.
Notes. 1. ThWEALTHY M大”, “kuan 款
(“yong dianhsemantics- BChinese char长”, “shi 时”很长时间” (a
Acknowle
This reseaNominal GLi is the co
Reference
Fawcett, Rhttps:
Fawcett, Rand S
Fawcett, RLond
Fawcett, RLond
Gao, F., &
.org
Figur
he event “zuo dakMAN, which will款”, but it is inconhua 用电话”; “yoBY PHONE and Fracters “yong 用””, “jian 间” for tha long time).
edgments
arch is financiaGroups: A Systorresponding a
es
R. P. (2000).://doi.org/10.1
R. P. (2008). InSimplification o
R. P. (forthcomdon: Equinox.
R. P. (forthcomdon: Equinox.
& Xu, S. H.
In
re 14. A summ
kuan 做大款” in l in turn be mappengruently realized
ongle henchang shFOR A LONG TIM”, “dian 电”, “huahe latter one, but
ally supportedtemic Functionauthor.
A Theory of075/cilt.206
nvitation to Sysof Halliday’s S
ming a). The
ming b). The F
(2000). Ming
nternational Jou
mary of lexical
the belief systemed onto a clause ind by a nominal ghijian 用了很长时
ME, which will ina 话” for the formit incongruently r
d by the nationnal Approach (
of Syntax for
stemic FunctioSystemic Func
Functional Sy
Functional Syn
dong zhuanyo
urnal of English
146
conversion wi
m is supposed to n the syntax at th
group “dakuan 大款
时间”) in the beliefn turn be mapped
mer one, and by sixrealized by a nomi
nal project: A (12BYY007).
Systemic Fun
onal Linguisticctional Gramm
yntax Handbo
ntax Handbook
ong yu yuyon
Linguistics
ithin Chinese n
be mapped onto he level of form by款” (a wealthy mf system is suppod onto a clause inx Chinese characteinal group “dianh
Contrastive StWeiwei Zhang
nctional Lingu
cs through the mar (3rd ed.). L
ook: Analyzing
k: Analyzing E
ng tuili (N-V
nominal group
a situation in they three Chinese ch
man). 2. The minoosed to be mappedn the syntax at theers “yong 用”, “le hua 电话” (phone
tudy of the Eng is the first au
uistics. Amste
Cardiff GramLondon: Equino
g English at t
English at the
Shift and Pra
Vol. 7, No. 6;
e semantics- TO haracters “zuo 做
or relationship of d onto a situation e level of form by了”, “hen 很”, “
) and “henchang s
nglish and Chuthor, and Man
erdam: Benjam
mmar: An Extenox.
the Level of F
Level of Mea
agmatic Infere
2017
BE A 做”, “da
object in the
y three “chang shijian
inese nliang
mins.
nsion
Form.
ning.
ence).
ijel.ccsenet.org International Journal of English Linguistics Vol. 7, No. 6; 2017
147
Waiguoyu (Journal of Foreign Languages), (2), 7-14. https://dx.doi.org/1004-5139(2000)02-0007-08.
Gao, H. (2008). Dongcihua jizhi de renzhi yufa kaocha (A Cognitive Grammar Analysis of Conversion from Nouns to Verbs in Chinese). Jiefangjun waiguoyu xueyuan xuebao (Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages), (5), 20-25. https://dx.doi.org/1002-722X(2008)05-0020-06
Gao, M. K. (1986). Hanyu yufa lun (On Chinese Grammar). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1988). On the Ineffability of Grammatical Categories. In J. Webster (Ed.), Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday: On Grammar (pp. 291-322). Beijing: Peking University Press. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.39.03hal
Halliday, M. A. K., & Ellis, J. O. (1951). Temporal Categories in the Modern Chinese Verb. In J. Webster (Ed.), Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday: Studies in Chinese Language (pp. 177-208). Beijing: Peking University Press.
He, W., & Hong, N. Z. (2014). “De” zai hanyu mingci cizuzhong de gongneng yanjiu (A Functional Study of de within Chinese Nominal Groups). Jiefangjun waiguoyu xueyuan xuebao (Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages), (5), 82-90. https://dx.doi.org/1002-722X(2014)05-0082-09
He, W., & Zhang, J. Y. (2008). Jiadefu yufa dui xini yufa de jianhua pingshu (The Cardiff Grammar: a Simplification of Halliday’s Functional Grammar). In G. W. Huang, W. He, & C. Y. Liao (Eds.), Xitong gongneng yufa rumen: jiadefu moshi (An Introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar: The Cardiff Model) (pp. 56-69). Beijing: Peking University Press.
Hu, A. S. (2006). Mingci dongyong yu jianleici de jiexian (Delimitation between Verbaliz 2014ed Nouns and Multifunctional Words). Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu (Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies), (5), 1-6.
Huang, G. W. (2006). Zuowei shiyong yuyanxue de xitong gongneng yuyanxue (Systemic Functional Linguistics as Applied Linguistics). Yingyu yanjiu (The Journal of English Studies), (4), 1-6.
Huang, G. W. (2007). Xitong gongneng jufa fenxi de mudi he yuanze (Aims and Principles for Systemic Functional Syntax Analysis). Waiyu xuekan (Foreign Language Research), (3), 39-45. https://dx.doi.org/1000-0100(2007)03-0039-7
Huang, G. W. (2007). Zuowei putong yuyanxue de xitong gongneng yuyanxue (Systemic Functional Linguistics as a General Linguistics Theory). Zhongguo waiyu (Foreign Languages in China), (5), 14-19. https://dx.doi.org/1672-9382(2007)05-0014-06
Liu, Y. H., Gu, W., & Pan, W. Y. (2004). Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa (Practical Modern Chinese Grammar). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Lv, S. X. (1979). Hanyu yufa fenxi wenti (Issues on Chinese Grammatical Analysis). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Ma, J. Z. (1898). Mashi wentong (Mashi Wentong). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Shen, J. X. (2010). Cong yanyuan shi ge dongci shuoqi (Start with the word “actor” being a verb). Dangdai xiucixue (Dangdai Xiucixue Journal), (1), 1-12.
Wang, K. Z. (1989). Guhanyu de cilei huoyong (Word-class Shift in Ancient Chinese). Changsha: Hu’nan People’s Press.
Wang, L. (1962). Gudai Hanyu (Ancient Chinese). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Press.
Wang, W. S. (1987). Yingyu mingci yongzuo zhuangyu (English Nouns Used as Adjunct). Shandong waiyu jiaoxue (Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal), (3), 29-31.
Zhang, B. J., & Fang, M. (1996). Hanyu gongneng jufa yanjiu (Studies in Chinese Functional Syntax). Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Press.
Zhu, D. X. (1982). Yufa jiangyi (Explanations on Grammar). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).