Licking County Players The Donations Festival The Donations Festival.
A drop in the bucket? The Analytic System and Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims
description
Transcript of A drop in the bucket? The Analytic System and Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims
A drop in the bucket? The Analytic System and Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims
Zheng (Sharon) BiPsychology and Social BehaviorUniversity of California, Irvine
“Baby Jessica”Received over $700,000 in donations from the
public, when she fell in a well near her home in Texas.
Identifiable Victim Effect (IVE)
Society is willing to spend far more money to save the lives of single, identifiable victims than to save statistical, groups of victims.
Lives are valued inconsistently.
“The death of a single Russian soldier is a tragedy. A million deaths is a statistic.”
----Josef Stalin Every dog has its day—but at
what price? More than $48,000 was
contributed to save a dog stranded on a ship adrift on the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii.
Food shortages in Malawi are affecting more than three million children.
More than 11 million people in Ethiopia need immediate food assistance.
Why is this happening?
Affect Heuristic (Slovic)Psychophysical
(emotional) numbing towards group of victims.
Logical connection (Sharon)“my donation does not
make a significant difference. It is just a drop in the bucket.”
My Research Proposal
Identifiable victim effect is not simply caused by emotion or affect, it has logical reasoning behind it as well.
Less money is donated to Statistical victims because people perceive their donation as “a drop in the bucket”.
Research Design
People read information from charity letters.Information on the charity letters was
manipulated.Intervention
Purpose: donation towards statistical victims is not “a drop in the bucket”.
Research Design: Groups and Conditions
Two groupsIdentifiable versus Statistical Victim groups
Three conditionsControl conditionTwo intervention conditions
Metric conditionGroup effort condition
Hypotheses
Control conditionThe identifiable victim effect will be replicated
Intervention conditionsThe identifiable victim effect will be reduced or
eliminated.
Control Condition Identifiable Victim
Any money that you donate will go to Shona, a 7-year-old girl from Mali, Africa. Shona is desperately poor, and faces a threat of severe hunger or even starvation. Her life will be changed for the better as a result of your financial gift. Save the Children will work with Shona’s family and other members of the community to help feed her, provide her with education, as well as basic medical care and hygiene education.
Control Condition Identifiable Victim
Any money that you donate will go to Shona, a 7-year-old girl from Mali, Africa. Shona is desperately poor, and faces a threat of severe hunger or even starvation. Her life will be changed for the better as a result of your financial gift. Save the Children will work with Shona’s family and other members of the community to help feed her, provide her with education, as well as basic medical care and hygiene education.
Statistical Victim Any money that you donate
will go to more than three million children in Mali, Africa. They are desperately poor, and face a threat of severe hunger or even starvation. Their lives will be changed for the better as a result of your financial gift. Save the Children will work with these children’s families and other members of the community to help feed them, provide them with education, as well as basic medical care and hygiene education.
Metric Condition
Identifiable Victim group“$5 is enough to feed
Shona for a week”
Statistical Victim group“$5 is enough to feed
an African child for a week”
“Oh, I see how much my ‘drop’ can help.”
Group Effort Condition-- Individual efforts can be combined into a significant group effort The compact fluorescent light bulbs, also
called the energy saving light bulbs, emit the same light as classic light bulbs but use 75% or 80% less electricity. What that means is that if every one of 110 million American households bought just one energy saving light bulbs, took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. A similar group effort could help save African children.
Dependent Measures
Willingness to Contribute ($) After you have read the information above, are you willing
to contribute money to save the child (children)? Yes or NO
If yes, how much money you would like to donate at this moment?
Analytical questions—measures logical reasoning. Emotional/affective reactions Interpersonal Reactivity Index- Mark H. Davis (1980)-
measurement of empathy.
Dependent Measures
Willingness to Contribute ($) After you have read the information above, are
you willing to contribute money to save the child (children)? Yes or NO
If yes, how much money you would like to donate at this moment?
Analytical questions Emotional Reactions Interpersonal Reactivity Index- Mark H. Davis
(1980)-measure of empathy.
Sample
Ethnicity
1%
0%
55%16%
4%
19%5%
Black/African American
Native American
Asian
Latino
Middle Eastern
Whit/European American
Other
Gender
19%
81%
Male
Female
203 UCI students completed the survey online Randomly assigned to each group and condition.
Results
6.164.6
14.8513.23
6.24
12.21
02468
10121416
Control Metric Group Effort
Amou
nt o
f mon
ey
Condition
Amount of money people are willing to donate
Identifiable VictimStatistical Victim
Failed to replicate Identifiable victim effect ($IV<$SV)Significant condition difference (p=.002)
Group effort manipulation increased donationsMetric manipulation anchored responses to $5
More Results
Emotional reactions 7-point scale & 5 questionsNo significant differences among groups and
conditions.
More Results—Analytical Questions
“To what extent do you feel that it is effective to give money to aid this cause?”Positive correlation (r=.37, p<.01)
More Results—Analytical Questions
“Do you think that your contribution can make a significant difference in these children’s lives?”Positive correlation (r=.33, p<.01)
Follow-up Study
No evidence for the identifiable victim effect in the present study.
Follow-up Study Identifiable Victim
Any money that you donate will go to Shona, a 7-year-old girl from Mali, Africa. Shona is desperately poor, and faces a threat of severe hunger or even starvation. Her life will be changed for the better as a result of your financial gift. Save the Children will work with Shona’s family and other members of the community to help feed her, provide her with education, as well as basic medical care and hygiene education.
My version of Statistical Victim Any money that you donate
will go to more than three million children in Mali, Africa. They are desperately poor, and face a threat of severe hunger or even starvation. Their lives will be changed for the better as a result of your financial gift. Save the Children will work with these children’s families and other members of the community to help feed them, provide them with education, as well as basic medical care and hygiene education.
Identifiable Victim Any money that you donate
will go to Shona, a 7-year-old girl from Mali, Africa. Shona is desperately poor, and faces a threat of severe hunger or even starvation. Her life will be changed for the better as a result of your financial gift. Save the Children will work with Shona’s family and other members of the community to help feed her, provide her with education, as well as basic medical care and hygiene education.
Slovic’s version of Statistical Victim Food shortages in Malawi are
affecting more than three million children.
In Zambia, severe rainfall deficits have resulted in a 42 percent drop in maize production from 2000. As a result, an estimated three million Zambians face hunger.
Four million Angolans—one third of the population—have been forced to flee their homes.
More than 11 million people in Ethiopia need immediate food assistance.
Study Design
Three groupsIdentifiable VictimMy version of statistical victimSlovic’s version of statistical victim
Two conditionsControlGroup effort
Sample
N=122Randomly
assigned to each group and condition.
Gender
19%
81%
Male
Female
Ethnicity
0%
0%
55%
8%5%
22%
10%Black/African American
Native American
Asian
Latino
Middle Eastern
Whit/European American
Other
FindingsAmount of money that people are willing to donate
6.179.21
20.7922.26
6.45
15.68
0
5
10
15
20
25
Control Group Effort
Condition
Amou
nt o
f mon
ey
Identifiable Victim
My Statistical Victim
Slovic's Statistical Victim
Group effort manipulation increased the donation for all groups. In control condition, donation for IV almost equal to donation for
Slovic’s version of Statistical Victim. Consistent with the first study, donations for my SV is much higher
compared to other groups (p=.033)
More findings
Emotional reactionsReplicated the result from study one
Analytical questions (effectiveness & significant difference)Replicated the result from study one
Conclusions
Metric information tends to anchor people’s donations.“$5 is enough to feed an African child for a week”Donation ≈ $5
Group effort information really makes people realize that their contributions do make difference.It increased people’s donation in both studies.
Conclusions
Making a donation to individual is not just an emotional reaction, it has logical reasoning behind it.
Implications on how charities should approach people
Acknowledgment Prof. Peter H. Ditto Prof. Valerie Jenness Members of Ditto Lab
Graduate studentsDavid TannenbaumSena KolevaAndrew Mastronarde
Undergraduate studentsCassie DiazYvette Jaramillo Goldie Chan
Members of Social Ecology Honors’ Program