A Cold Atom Experiment
Transcript of A Cold Atom Experiment
A Cold Atom Experiment
Fuqiang Wang 王福强
Huzhou University, Purdue University
Outline Hydro flow or escape?
Motivation for a cold atom experiment Cold atom laboratory
To verify the uncertainty principle* Summary
Heavy ion experiment
7/26/2017 2 / 19 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
Model: Song et al. arXiv:1011.2783
The Hydrodynamics Paradigm
4
Strong elliptic anisotropy BNL press release 2005
Nearly perfect fluid (sQGP)
7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
5
Hydro questionable!
Mean free path: Lmfp = 1/rs
Ncoll = Opacity = L/Lmfp = rsL
AMPT
Ncoll ≈ O(1)
He, FW, et al. PLB753(16)506
Is it really hydro? Heavy ion collision: dN/dy 1000, r 1000/pR2t 6 fm-3
rsL 7fm-3*3mb*3fm 5
7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
Relative escape contribution
• Escape contribution still sizeable even at x10 larger x-sections.
8
Ncoll ≈ 5 20 35 50
7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
Strong anisotropy, but no energy loss
9 7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
Small system collisions
Flow from Coulomb interaction
• Coulomb interactions
• Can change trap size and anisotropy, and ion density
10
• a = 10 nm, b = 80 nm, c = 100 nm
• Number of ions =1000
• Initial thermal velocity 2000m/s
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Flow from Coulomb and Elastic scattering
11
a = 10 nm, b = 24 nm, c = 50 nm
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Trap size: ab = 240 nm2, c = 50 nm. Number of particles: 1000
Anisotropy mechanism
12
Expansion, flow Hydro paradigm
No expansion Escape
7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
13
Heavy ion collisions
Perfect liquid Hydrodynamics
Low density/opacity Mundane physics
Need experimental test!
7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
14
K. M
. O’H
ara
et a
l., S
cien
ce 2
98
, 21
79
(2
00
2)
Another system with large anisotropy
Large elliptic anisotropy in cold atom systems
consistent with hydrodynamic flow
7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
Opacity
15
Mean free path: Lmfp = 1/rs , Ncoll = Opacity = L/Lmfp = rsL
AMPT
Low opacity in AMPT
a ≈ 5×10-5 cm sint ≈ 10-8 cm2
r ≈ 5×1013 /cm3
Lmfp ≈ 2×10-6 cm L ≈ 2×10-3 cm L/Lmfp ≈ 1000
Ncoll ≈ O(1)
Indeed hydro!
Hydro??
Very high opacity for the cold atom system
Heavy ion collision: dN/dy 1000, r 1000/pR2t 6 fm-3
rsL 7fm-3*3mb*3fm 5
Cold atom system:
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
K. M
. O’H
ara
et a
l., S
cien
ce 2
98
, 21
79
(2
00
2)
To emulate QGP with cold atoms K
. M. O
’Har
a et
al.,
Sci
ence
29
8, 2
17
9 (
20
02
)
rsintL: reduce opacity by 103
1000 1
a ≈ 5×10-5 cm sint ≈ 10-8 cm2
r ≈ 5×1013 /cm3
Lmfp ≈ 2×10-6 cm L ≈ 2×10-3 cm L/Lmfp ≈ 1000
Very high opacity for the cold atom system
Opacity: rsL
X10-3
0-1
Low opacity for the cold atom system
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 16 7/26/2017
A cold atom experiment Setting up a cold atom experiment in Huzhou University
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 17 7/26/2017
Summary
• Close connections between hot QGP and cold atoms.
• Cold atoms are hydrodynamical; QGP may not be.
Make it less interacting, more dilute, or smaller to mimic QGP.
• QGP is quantum mechanical; cold atoms are “classical.”
Make it smaller, or colder to mimic QGP, and measure the uncertainty principle.
• Use controllability of cold atom system to address QGP questions
18 7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop
Hot QGP vs Cold Atoms
19 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
To verify the uncertainty principle*
20
T = 104 K
Classical?
Quantum Mechanical?
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Is QGP classical?
21
?
K. M
. O’H
ara
et a
l., S
cien
ce 2
98
, 21
79
(2
00
2)
Li: M6000 MeV T1mK10-16MeV
x20mm, y100mm p(TM)1/210-6MeV
p quan1/r10-8MeV
E quan1/(mr2)10-20MeV Negligible!
Cold atoms are hot,
“classical” w.r.t. trap size.
Ko
lb, H
ein
z, n
ucl
-th
/03
05
08
4;
Lisa
et
al. N
ew J
. Ph
ys. 1
3 (
20
11
) 0
65
00
6
q,g: M0 MeV T200 MeV
x3fm, y4fm p200MeV
p quan1/r200MeV
E quan200 MeV Comparable!
QGP is cold,
quantum mechanical.
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
QM uncertainty principle
/ 2x p
y
x
x yp p
2 22 2
22 2 2 2cos2
x y
x y
p py xv
y x p p
- -
22 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Infinite square well
22
cos
2
sin
odd
even
nx
aE
nmx
a
p
p
-
22 2 2 2
2
2 2 22 2 2
Take even mode for example:
2 ; ;
4
2 2 > / 24 4
oddx
x odd
a np k x k
k a
k ap x n
p
p
-
- -
2 2 2 2
2 2 22 2 for all .
x y
x y
p p b av n
b ap p
- -
23
a
b
1 fm
Single state anisotropy
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Harmonic oscillator
22 2 21 1
; 2 2 2
m x E E nm
-
22 2
2 2
1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2
1
2
x
x
p Em x n
m
p x n
2 2
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 for each and all
x y x y
x yx y
x y
x y
p pv
p p
y x
y x
v n
- -
- -
24 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Thermal probability
then it’s independent of potential. It’s isotropic at all temperature because K=(px
2+py2)/2m is isotropic.
Because This is classical physics limit.
x, y at same Fermi energy, so different number of filled energy levels.
At high temperature, classical limit, sum is approximated by integral:
25 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Thermal probability weight
26 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Quantum physics anisotropy
27
D. Molnar, FW, and C.H. Greene, arXiv:1404.4119
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Cold atoms Strong elliptic anisotropy
K. M. O’Hara et al., Science 298, 2179 (2002).
Lithium atoms M ~ 6000 MeV Temperature T ~ 1 mK ~ 10-16 MeV Trap size x ~ 20 mm, y ~ 100 mm Typical momentum (TM)1/2 ~ 10-6 MeV Intrinsic momentum quantum ~ 1/r ~ 10-8 MeV, negligible. Typical energy ~ T ~ 10-16 MeV Intrinsic energy quantum 1/(mr2) ~ 10-20 MeV, negligible. Cold Lithium atoms are actually “hotter” than the hot QGP.
~ 10-5
The observed large v2 is indeed due to strong interactions.
29 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Is quantum v2 real in QGP?
30
K. M
. O’H
ara
et a
l., S
cien
ce 2
98
, 21
79
(2
00
2)
Li: M6000 MeV T1mK10-16MeV
x20mm, y100mm p(TM)1/210-6MeV
p quan1/r10-8MeV
E quan1/(mr2)10-20MeV Negligible!
Cold atoms are hot,
classical.
Ko
lb, H
ein
z, n
ucl
-th
/03
05
08
4;
Lisa
et
al. N
ew J
. Ph
ys. 1
3 (
20
11
) 0
65
00
6
q,g: M0 MeV T200 MeV
x3fm,y4fm p200MeV
p quan1/r200MeV
E quan200 MeV Comparable!
QGP is cold,
quantum mechanical.
X10-2
x10-4
• It should be… but need experiment to verify (cold atom experiment)
• Cold atoms are “classical.” Make it Quantum Mechanical.
• Would be neat to verify QM and uncertainty principle
Sichuan University AMPT Workshop 7/26/2017
Summary
• Close connections between hot QGP and cold atoms.
• Cold atoms are hydrodynamical; QGP may not be.
Make it less interacting, more dilute, or smaller to mimic QGP.
• QGP is quantum mechanical; cold atoms are “classical.”
Make it smaller, or colder to mimic QGP, and measure the uncertainty principle.
• Use controllability of cold atom system to address QGP questions
31 7/26/2017 Sichuan University AMPT Workshop