A CA of english and persian intonation melika rajabi
Transcript of A CA of english and persian intonation melika rajabi
Introduction
Contrastive Analysis Declaratives: +/-
Simple sentences Questions: Wh Q
Yes/no Tag Q
Compound sentences Coordinate Sen.
Subordinate Sen. Conditional Sen
Predictions dependent clause
Experiment
Discussion
Conclusion
Theoretical stand point
First objective
Predict the problems of Iranian speakers in
producing the correct patterns of English
intonation
Simple
Three levels of structure Compound
Complex
Second objective
Evaluate CAH by means of a simple
experiment
CAH:
The degrees of similarity and difference
correspond respectively to the degrees
of simplicity and difficulty.
Simple Sentences
Falling intonation
English +
Persian +
Affirmative
Example
No serious difference
Declaratives
Declaratives
Negative
Falling intonation Stress
Negative markers
English + _
Persian + næ/ ne/ mæ
The intonation patterns don’t seem to be exactly the same
Questions
Wh Q
Example:
Falling
intonation
Stress
English + Secondary stress/ Voice on content
word
Persian + Primary stress/ voice on Q word
Questions
Yes/no Q
intonation
English 23 Glides to a slightly higher position
Persian Rising intonation
No change in word order except for ?aya
A change in the word order of the statement
Questionslg Intonation Rising Falling
English Asking for
information
Get the
conformation
Persian Seeking information Confirmation
Question-tags
English
Rising intonation: The speaker is asking for
information
(2 3 2I2)
4
3
2
1
You can do it, can’t you?
Falling intonation: The speaker is a little more
sure that s/he is trying to get the confirmation
she expects
/2 3 1I3 1/
Compound sentences
2 sent. have falling tone if conj væ is fully pronounced
In PersianThe pre-conj remains level, but the post-conj Sen is
falling
Compound sentences
Each Sen has only one primary stress
In English
/232I231/ Slight pause at the end of the first Sen but the pitch
goes on with the beginning of the second sentence
Subordinate sentences
Conditional sentences
if-clause: a low rise
In Persian
Subordinate clause: falling tone
Last syllable of the if-clause
receives primary accent followed
by a low rise
If is omitted in if-clause the
intonation pattern doesn’t change
If the order of clauses change, the
intonation pattern will slightly change
1. if clause: /2 3 2/ pattern
In English subordinate clause: /2 3 1/ pattern
2.if clause: /2 3 2/ pattern with a low rise
subordinate clause: /2 3 1/ pattern
In English
The speaker intends to have a pause
so we have a little rise at the end of
the modifying clause
No pause
Predictions
Basic assumptions of CAH:
Learners of any lg tend to transfer the structure of
their native lg into that of target lg.
General predictions derived
from the contrast made btw 2
lg Negative statements
Empathic expression
is rendered as
Question-tags
No difficulty in intonation but substituting the information-
seeking intonation with asking for confirmation
is rendered as
Different types of clauses
Difference: stress patterns of the 2 lgs causes the learners to raise their voice on the Persian-based accented words
is rendered as
Experiment The idea of interference was of preliminary significance
to the present study
Experiment
Subjects 10 university students majoring in fields other than English
Data Statements and questions among all the Sen types discussed
Administration -Select Sen of other types to divert their attention
-Read Sen once
-Record their voice
-four judges
-format with 3 column: words, tones, attitudes
Data analysis -Columns analyzed separately
-divide responses: S=similar to normal Eng
D=different from normal Eng.
followed Persian stress= inter
Locate stress on other words= others
Discussion
Affirmative Sentences:
1. 95% of SS, read with falling intonation
2. 29% followed the Persian Sen stress rule in
specifying the prominent words
In Persian stress occurs mostly on the final words or phrases
20% stressed the words of the Sen in other
places according to their perception
Intralingual error, a complexity
within the TL
Negative sentences
93% correct in falling intonation
62.25% stressed the wrong words
50.75% located the strongest stress in negative
markers
Wh-question
Contrary with predictions:
15% followed Persian stress sys (Not interference)
Correct prediction:
84% of SS read Sen with a falling tone
Information-seeking type
Yes/no Q
Confirmed predictions
87% used rising intonation at the end of the Q
60.25% located the correct Sen stress.
39.75% Placed strongest stress on other words
Confusing phenomenon
Are you watching, boys?
Boy is an addressee in the former
Boy is an obj in the latter
Word ordering
English: often fixed
Wh-words
Persian: Flexibility is relatively greater
English: always fixed
Negative markers
Persian: more flexible
Conclusion
Stress has sig influence on intonation
To make the analysis reliable we have to take
the entire sentence structure into account not
just the end of it.
Lg intonation Falling in Rising in
English/ Persian statements, Wh-
questions
Yes/no questions
and some types
of tag questions
Similarities btw English and Persian
Conclusion
Because Terms similarity and difference defined
broadly, result of many studies may not be valid
so we have to define them narrowly to have an
accurate result.
Six level generalizations to specify the relative
degrees of similarity and difference between the
intonation patterns of 2 lgs
Level 2
The final syllable of the word in the 2 lgs is
stressed regardless of its location in the Sen.
Level 3
The final two-syllable word of the 2 Sen. is
stressed but:
The primary stress occurs on the
first syllable in L2
The primary stress occurs on
the second syllable in L2
Level 5
The negative markers are stressed in L1
but unstressed or less stressed in L2
The pitch changes toward
the end of the sentence
The pitch changes
on negative markers
Level 6
Wh-words are stressed in L1 but
unstressed or less stressed in L2
Their position is fixed in L2
Any content word
towards the end of
the sentence