9:00-10:30Pilot interventions session plan

• Summary of previous day - 15’• Group discussions – 45’• Report back – 30’

Background• Good practice report and principles• Sumary on evidence• Pilot intervention themes• Open discussion from yesterday

General ideas• Feasibility, flexibility and pragmatism. Keep it simple. (Finland

and IE)• Different interventions but comparable• Gender perspective (Finland)• Confidentiality issues (Poland)• Quality versus Quantity (Scotland)• Embedded in a health promotion perspective (Poland)• Public health and best practice perspective (Romania)• Individual companies choices. • Minimal impact on day-to-day work (UK). • Economic difficulties for many enterprises (Greece).• Share resources (Croatia)

Target• Engaging intermediaries (Trade Unions) (IE)• Work with known companies and adapt

implementation to the stage of development (absolute beginners, champions) (Italy)

• Try to reach different sectors (Italy)• Smaller companies (Scotland)• The same multinational in different countries (Ireland)• Company’s size and the impact in implementation

(Eurocare)

How and WhatHow• Guidelines should be developed immediately (all)• Materials, resources and (assessment) tools (Cr) • Peer to peer methodology (Italy and Romania) or

cascade (Scotland)What• Promote an alcohol policy development within the

company (Scotland)• Policy templates adaptable to each company (UK)• Self-help on-line tools (UK)

More…..Assessment• Qualitative (soft) or quantitative (hard) indicators Barriers• Time constraints: preparation 3-6 months (Be)• Defining start and end point for pilots (Germany)

Proposal of principles of the pilot interventions from the lessons learnt

What type of intervention?

Why is this particular company participating? Which are the aims and objectives of the company?

Who? To whom is the intervention addressed? Who will actively participate in the implementation?

Where? When? Schedule the timing.

How? Plan evaluation . Agree intervention content.

Levels of intervention

BASIC1. Awareness raising 2. Targeted training

MEDIUM1. Awareness raising - 2. Targeted training

3. Policy development/update & implementation

COMPREHENSIVE1. Awareness raising 2 - targeted training

3. Policy development/update & implementation4. Early identification, referral to clinical care and reinsertion.

Working groupsWG1 - Raising awareness and targeted training

Rapporteur/chair – Mary Elmers (AFS)

WG2 - Policy development and implementationRapporteur/chair – Bart Garmyn (Securex)

WG3 - Early identification , intervention and referralRapporteur/chair – Lidia Segura (GENCAT)

WG4 - Assessment toolRapporteur/chair – Theodor Haratau (RF)

Working groups• Discuss its importance• Identify and define key elements that should be

included• Identify existing examples if any

• Rapporteur/Chair: – Lead the group (4 people minimum)– Report to the group (oral) – 5 minutes– Bullet points to be shared with SARD