9. 10. Noes). xyO,+%/,, N/A - UNT Digital Library/67531/metadc...the containment vessel and internal...

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE P.0. t

*&%

6 3 4 9 9 6 ............................ .......... 3

13a. Description of Change

F u l l s c a l e r e v i s i o n

?. ECN Category (mark one)

supplRmental

Standby [I

Direct Revision 1x1

I; Change ECN Twnporary

Supersedure Cancel/Void

13b. Design Baseline Docunent? [I yes [XI NO

3. Originator's Name, Organization, HSIN, 4 . US0 Required? 5. Date and Telephone No.

K. E . Smith, SNF P r o j e c t s , R3- [ ] Yes [XI NO 9/11/96 85, 376-0273 6. Project Title/No./Uork Order No. 7. Bldg./Sys./Fac. No. 8. Approval Designator

M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack/W-442 N/A S , 9

WHC-SD-SNF-SOW-001, Rev. xyO,+%/,, N/A N/A

9 . Docunent Nunbers Changed by this ECN 10. Related ECN Noes). 11. Related Po NO. (includes sheet no. and rev.)

14a. Justification (mark one)

:riteria Change [ X I Design lmprovement [ ] Environmental [ I FaciLity Deactivation [I 9s-Found [ ] Facilitate COnSt [ ] Const. ErrorlOmission [ ] Design Errorlomission [ ] 14b. Justification Details D e l i v e r a b l e s f o r f i n a l des ign a r e d e f i n e d i n more d e t a i l

12a. Modification Work

rl Ye:. ( f i t t out Blk.

A-7900-0'13-2 (05 /96) GEFO95

12b. Work Package 12c. Modification Work Complete 12d. Restored to Original Condi- NO. tion (Temp. or Standby ECN only)

A-7900.013-1

16. Design V e r i f i c a t i o n Required

[ I Yes

[XI No

SDDIDD

17. cost Impact 18. schedule Impact (days) ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION

Addit ional [ ] $ Additional [ I $ Improvement [ ] savings [ I Delay [ I $ savings [ I $

Function,d Design Criteria

Operating Specification

Cnticallty Spsclficatlon

Conceptcoal Design Report

Equipment Spec.

const. spec

Procurernant spec

Vendor lhformation

OM Maniiai

FSARISPR

Safety Equipment List

Radiation W o k Permit

Environmental Impact Statement

Environmental Rapon

Environrnental Permit

SeismiclStmss Analysis

StrsaslDesign Report

Interface Control Drawing

Caltbration Procedure

lnntallatian Procedure

Maintenance Procedure

Engineering Procedure

Operating Instruction

Operating Procedure

Operational Safety Raquirsment

iEFD Drawing

Cell Arrangement Drawmg

Essential Material Specification

Fac. Proc. Samp. Schedule

[ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I [ I r i

Inspscflan Plan

Inventory Adiustment Requast

Tank Calibration Manual r i Health Physics Procedure

Spares Multiple Unit Listing

Test ProcedureslSpecification

Component Index

ASME Coded Item

Human Factor Consideration

Computer Software

Electnc Circuit Schedule

ICRS Procedure

Process Control ManuallPlan

Process Flow Chart

Purchass Requisition

Tickler File

L J [ I [ I 20. Other Affected Docunents: (NOTE: Docunents Listed below u i l l not be revised by t h i s ECN.) Signatures below ' indicate that the signing organization has been n o t i f i e d of other affected docunents I i s t e d below.

Document NumberlRevision Document Nunber/Revision Document Nunber Revision

21. Approvals

Signature Date Design Authority

Cog. Eng. i; /,: i' .,' 'd K r d -*-..,a 9L,h4

Cog. HYr. ,~ . . ~ ' I ,I ,' m' QA J ' c . , ,i ' c >, .> Id ,*- t ' f l

Safety i, j ' ::./ e'< ,.' Environ.

Other

See Page 3 of ECN f a r Approvals Signature

Design Agent

PE

QA

Safety

Design

Environ.

Other

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

signature or a ContraL Number that tracks the Approval Signature

Date

ADDITIONAL

A-7900-0'13-3 (05/96) GEF096

P.0.j Of 2-L

--@€- 1. ED1 ENGINEERING DATA TRANSMITTAL

ED-7400-172-2 (04 /94 ) GEF097

BD-7400172.1

WHC-SD-SNF-SOW-001,Rev. 1

Statement of Work for System Design and Engineering of the SNF Multi-Canister Overpack

K. E. Smi th Westinghouse Hanford Company, R ich land, WA 99352 U.S. Department o f Energy C o n t r a c t DE-AC06-87RL10930

EDT/ECN: ECN NO. 634996 UC: UC-510 Org Code: 8KA10 Charge Code: LE008 B&R Code: EW3135040 T o t a l Pages: 22

Key Words: Spent Fue l , M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack, Packaging

A b s t r a c t : T h i s document d e s c r i b e s t h e workscope f o r f i n a l d e s i g n o f t h e M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack t o be used f o r l o n g t e r m s t o r a g e o f N Reactor f u e l .

AutoCAD i s a R e g i s t e r e d Trademark o f AutoDesk, I n c .

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference herein t o any speci f ic comnercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otheruise, does not necessarily const i tu te or imply i t s endorsement, recarmendation, or favoring by the United States Govermnt or any agency thereof o r i t s contractors or subcontractors.

Pr in ted i n the United States o f Amrica. To obtain copies o f t h i s document, contact. UHClBCS Docment Control Services, P.0 Box 1970, Mailstop H6-08, Richland UA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420; Fax (509) 376-4989.

Date L-

Approved for Public Release

A-6400-073 (10/95) GEF321

(1) Document Number

RECORD OF REVISION WHC-SD-SNF-SOW- 001

Page 1

r

I I 1

&-7320-005 (08191) WEF168

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR SYSTEM DESIGN AND ENGINEERING OF THE SNF

MULTI-CANISTER OVERPACK

WHC-SD-SNF-SOW-001 R e v i s i o n 1

SEPTEMBER 1996

Prepared for the U.S. Department o f Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management

WHC-SD-SNF-SOW-001 Rev . 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Requested Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Project Objective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.0 WORKSCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 .2 Design Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.3 Design Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.4 Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 .5 Preliminary Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 .1 Management Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 .2 Technical Direction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.3 Business Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3.1 Issues/Concerns and Action Tracking System . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3.2 Monthly Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.4 Meetings and Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4.1 Kick-Off Meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4.2 Status Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4.3 Design Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4.4 Coordination Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.5 Document Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.5.1 General Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.5.2 Document Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.5.3 Document Identification and Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.5.4 Document Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.5.5 Document Transmittal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.6 Records Management Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.6.1 Record Files and Objective Evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.7 Configuration Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.8 Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.8 .1 Quality Assurance Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.8.2 Quality Assurance Accessibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.8.3 Corrective Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3 .8 .4 Quality Assurance Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.8.5 Quality Assurance Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.9 Independent Safety Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.10 Change Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

i

WHC-SO-SNF-SOW-001 Rev . 1

4 .0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRED SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 4.1 Phase 2 Design O b j e c t i v e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.2 Design Work Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.2.1 Design End Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

5.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

7.0 ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

i i

WHC-SD-SNF-SOW-001 Rev. 1

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR PHASE 2 DESIGN OF THE MULTIPLE CANISTER OVERPACK SUBPROJEC'I

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 REQUESTED SERVICES

This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the work scope for the preparation o f the Phase 2 (final) design for the Multiple Canister Overpack (MCO) equipment. The MCO is to be used as the radiological containment device for the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) assemblies, currently in wet storage in K East and West Basins, to be transported and stored in the Canister Storage Building (CSB) until final disposal facilities are made available. The engineering services contractor will be requested to provide reports, studies, analyses, engineering, drawings, specifications, estimates and schedules.

The overall goal of this task order is to do the following:

1. Prepare a fabrication specification, ASME Code exception report, a packaging, shipping and warehouse plan, and detailed fabrication drawings of the MCO in accordance with the MCO Performance Specification (WHC-S-0426, Rev. 2) for procurement activities by the SNF MCO Subproject.

2. Establish and maintain a comment data base on the comments, resolutions, changes to the design of the MCO.

3 . Support fabrication activities through the review of vendor fabrication drawings and shop test reports.

1 .2 BACKGROUND

The Hanford Spent Nuclear Fuel Project has committed to an accelerated schedule for removing spent nuclear fuel from the K Basins to a new storage facility in the 200 Areas. A key part of this action involves retrieval of the SNF materials from the basin water storage pools and transfer into the MCOs that will be used for storage of fuel prior to and after conditioning. The MCO is one of the most critical components o f the overall system because of its multiple functions and interfaces. The MCO interfaces with several portions of the SNF Project during its life cycle.

The general MCO interfaces are listed below:

The MCO is used in the basin as a container for the SNF being removed from the K West and East Basins. The fuel is to be reracked into a fuel basket and the basket is then loaded into the MCO in the basin pool. After sealing, the MCO is then drained of free water and vacuum dried at the Cold Vacuum Drying (CVD) Facility before being stored at the CSB.

1


T i t l e M i l e s t o n e number

The MCO i s used i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e t r a n s p o r t t h e SNF t o t h e CSB.

Date

s h i p p i n g cask t o c o n t a i n and

Beg in Phase 2 ( f i n a l ) des ign .

Phase 2 des ign 100% comple te

D e l i v e r f i r s t shipment o f MCOs

Beg in I n i t i a l shipment o f Fuel

Award F a b r i c a t i o n C o n t r a c t

The MCO i s used a t t h e Hot C o n d i t i o n i n g System (HCS) F a c i l i t y as a c o n d i t i o n i n g vesse l whereby some o f t h e hyd ra tes and h y d r i d e s on t h e SNF and i n t h e MCO a r e broken down t o r e l e a s e some o f t h e i r compounded hydrogen.

The MCO i s used a t t h e CSB t o h o l d and c o n t a i n t h e SNF d u r i n g an i n t e r i m s t o r a g e p e r i o d o f up t o 75 yea rs . The CSB l o c a t i o n i s w i t h i n t h e 200 East Area o f t h e Hanford S i t e , app rox ima te l y 48 km (30 m i ) no r thwes t o f R ich land , Washington.

10/01/96

03/04/97

11/03/97

12/31/97

05/01/97

1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVE

The SNF MCO Subpro jec t o b j e c t i v e i s t o des ign , f a b r i c a t e , t e s t , and p r o c u r e t h e conta inment vesse l and i n t e r n a l components f o r t h e f u e l assembl ies t o suppor t i n i t i a t i o n o f f u e l removal a c t i v i t i e s by December 1997.

The h i g h l e v e l s u b p r o j e c t m i l e s t o n e s a re d e p i c t e d i n Tab le 1-1. Tab le 1-1. MCO Subpro jec t M i l e s t o n e s .

2 .0 WORK SCOPE

Th is SOW i s i n tended t o address t h e Phase 2 des ign th rough March 1997. Suppor t d u r i n g l a t t e r phases o f t h i s p r o j e c t may be a d m i n i s t e r e d th rough r e v i s i o n s t o t h i s SOW. The S e l l e r s h a l l be f u l l y r e s p o n s i b l e and accoun tab le f o r t h e work performed under t h i s SOW. The S e l l e r s h a l l be r e s p o n s i b l e and accoun tab le f o r t he p r o f e s s i o n a l q u a l i t y , t e c h n i c a l accuracy , c o s t - e f f e c t i v e n e s s , t i m e l i n e s s , c o o r d i n a t i o n , and development o f a l l end i t e m d e l i v e r a b l e s per fo rmed under t h i s SOW. A l l t e c h n i c a l work s h a l l comply w i t h t h e MCO Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n (WHC-S-0426, Rev. 2 ) .

2


2.1 GENERAL

The Seller shall perform Phase 2 design in sufficient detail to permit procurement of MCO’s under a firm fixed price contract.

In addition to all basic design support analyses (such as structural, seismic, thermal, etc), the Seller shall also perform all required special design support analyses, including, but not limited to, shielding; reliability, availability, and maintainability; life-cycle cost; human factors engineering assessment; operabilitylmaintainability assessments; etc. The final design work shall be documented and summarized in a Design Report. All design media prepared under this contract shall become the property of the DOE.

The Phase 2 design shall incorporate the design features resulting from the prototype development and testing program. Prototype fabrication drawings and analyses will be provided to the Seller for incorporation into Phase 2 design. The Seller should notify the Technical Representative (MCO Subproject Design Authority) of any deviations from these design features deemed necessary t o comply with the Performance Specification, and include justification for the change. deviation.

The Seller shall obtain Technical Representative concurrence for each

2.2 DESIGN RESPONSIBIL ITY

The Seller shall be considered the responsible design agent ensuring that the overall MCO design, including designs furnished by subcontractors, meets all the specification criteria.

2.3 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

The design shall be in accordance with the MCO Performance Specification (WHC- S-0426, Rev. 2).

2.4 SCHEDULE

The MCO Phase 2 Design milestones are presented in Table 2-1. should propose in work plan a schedule for the deliverables to be provided at the 60% and 90% design reviews.

Deliverables at the 90% complete milestone should be fully developed, except for incorporating reviewer comments, which represents the final 10% of the design effort.

The Seller

3

M i l e s t o n e *

Phase 2 Design Task Award

Phase 2 Des ign 60% r e v i e w completed

Phase 2 Des ign 90% r e v i e w i n i t i a t e d

Phase 2 Des ign 100% complete

2.5 PRELIMINARY INFORMATION

A l l p r o t o t y p i c d e s i g n media (d raw ings , analyses, s t u d i e s , e t c . ) w i l l be p r o v i d e d under separa te cove r .

Da te

10/01/96

12/10/96

01/24/97

03/04/97

3.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

T h i s s e c t i o n d e s c r i b e s t h e p r o j e c t management approach and t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r t h e S e l l e r p r o j e c t management system f o r t h e MCO S u b p r o j e c t Des ign phase.

3 . 1 MANAGEMENT APPROACH

Q v e r a l l p r o j e c t management w i l l be p r o v i d e d by t h e SNF MCO S u b p r o j e c t Manager. A d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e S e l l e r c o n t r a c t w i l l be p r o v i d e d by t h e d e s i g n a t e d procurement s p e c i a l i s t . R e p r e s e n t a t i v e f o r a l l scope i n c l u d e d i n t h i s Statement o f Work.

The SNF MCO Design A u t h o r i t y i s t h e T e c h n i c a l

3 .2 TECHNICAL DIRECTION

The SNF MCO Techn ica l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e has t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y and a u t h o r i t y t o p r o v i d e t e c h n i c a l d i r e c t i o n t o t h e S e l l e r f o r a c t i v i t i e s w i t h i n t h e scope o f t h i s SOW. impac ts any o f t h e c o n t r a c t c o s t / s c h e d u l e p r o v i s i o n s o r i t s t e rms o r c o n d i t i o n s , must come o n l y f rom t h e procurement s p e c i a l i s t . The S e l l e r s h a l l n o t i f y t h e procurement s p e c i a l i s t o f any d i r e c t i o n i t has r e c e i v e d f r o m t h e 'SNF MCO T e c h n i c a l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e o r S u b p r o j e c t Manager t h a t impac ts t h e c o n t r a c t p r o v i s i o n s and r e q u e s t a u t h o r i z a t i o n .

Any changes t o t h e requ i remen ts o f t h i s SOW, o r d i r e c t i o n t h a t

4

WHC-SO-SNF-SOW-001 Rev. 1

3.3 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

3.3.1 Issues/Concerns and A c t i o n T r a c k i n g System

The S e l l e r s h a l l deve lop and m a i n t a i n an i s s u e s and concerns t r a c k i n g system. T h i s system s h a l l r e c o r d and t r a c k s i g n i f i c a n t d e s i g n - r e l a t e d i s s u e s t h a t a re r a i s e d by any SNF s u b p r o j e c t p a r t i c i p a n t o r o u t s i d e o v e r s i g h t e n t i t y , b u t a r e n o t immed ia te l y r e s o l v a b l e . The system s h a l l c l e a r l y i d e n t i f y t h e i s s u e , t h e p a r t y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r r e s o l u t i o n , and a p lanned i s s u e c l o s u r e da te . The system s h a l l i n c l u d e i s s u e s / a c t i o n s r a i s e d v i a cor respondence and d u r i n g mee t ings .

I n a d d i t i o n t h e S e l l e r w i l l e s t a b l i s h and m a i n t a i n a comment da tabase c o n t a i n i n g t h e ques t i ons , comments, concerns and t h e r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e i ssues , a c t i o n s and concerns .

3.3.2 Mon th l y Repor t s

The S e l l e r s h a l l p r o v i d e mon th l y s t a t u s r e p o r t s . These r e p o r t s s h a l l be submi t ted on o r be fo re t h e t e n t h day o f each month ( f o r t h e p r e v i o u s month) and s h a l l i n c l u d e , b u t n o t be l i m i t e d t o , t h e f o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n :

P r o j e c t manager 's n a r r a t i v e h i g h l i g h t s and s t a t u s assessment f o r each CWBS e lement i n c l u d i n g a c t i v i t i e s p lanned f o r t h e n e x t month

Issues /concerns ( c o s t , schedule, t e c h n i c a l ) , recommended s o l u t i o n ,

DOE "Cost Performance Repor t " f o rma ts 1 and 3 and Var iance

and p rog ress toward r e s o l u t i o n

A n a l y s i s ( s e e DOE Order 1332.1A, U n i f o r m R e p o r t i n g System [DOE 19851 comple ted a t t h e CWBS l e v e l . Repor ts shou ld p r o v i d e i n t e g r a t e d CWBS cos t / schedu le d a t a f o r measur ing per fo rmance. t h e l a t e s t r e v i s e d e s t i m a t e s h a l l be i n c l u d e d i n t h e Cost Performance Repor t . The Var iance A n a l y s i s s h a l l be on t h e c u r r e n t month and cumu la t i ve - to -da te and i n c l u d e cause, e f f e c t , and c o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n . The v a r i a n c e a n a l y s i s s h a l l be p repared a t t h e CWBS l e v e l w i t h e x p l a n a t i o n l o w e r r e q u i r e d t o adequa te l y address problems ( o f f s e t t i n g va r iance , e t c . ) . Cost and schedu le v a r i a n c e a n a l y s i s t h r e s h o l d s ( c u r r e n t month and c u m u l a t i v e da te ) s h a l l be SlOk and 10%.

S ta tused c r i t i c a l p a t h l o g i c ne twork schedu les and a f o r e c a s t o f schedu le impacts , i n c l u d i n g a s t a t u s e d l o g o f c o n t r o l m i l e s t o n e s .

The mon th l y Cost Performance

Earned v a l u e p rog ress and any changes i n

5


3.4 MEETINGS AND REVIEWS

3.4.1 K i c k - O f f Mee t ing

A des ign k i c k - o f f mee t ing w i l l be h e l d a t t h e S e l l e r ’ s o f f i c e a f t e r t h e t a s k i s awarded. documents t o accompl ish t h e r e q u i r e d a c t i v i t i e s . d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e SOW and S e l l e r ’ s work p l a n .

3.4.2 S t a t u s Meet ings

B i -week ly meet ings s h a l l be h e l d a t t h e S e l l e r ’ s o f f i c e s t o r e v i e w p rog ress o f t h e work. D u r i n g these meet ings , t h e S e l l e r s h a l l p r e s e n t s u b p r o j e c t t e c h n i c a l p rog ress . D u r i n g t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n , t h e S e l l e r s h a l l i d e n t i f y e x i s t i n g o r a n t i c i p a t e d prob lem areas f o r each a c t i v i t y ( i n c l u d i n g impac ts ) , and r e p o r t on p rog ress toward prob lem r e s o l u t i o n . The S e l l e r s h a l l p repare and d i s t r i b u t e t h e mee t ing m inu tes w i t h i n 10 work ing days a f t e r t h e mee t ing f o r app rova l by t h e SNF MCO Subpro jec t Manager. M inu tes s h a l l emphasize i ssues , concerns and p lanned a c t i o n s .

The purpose o f t h e mee t ing i s t o p r o v i d e t h e S e l l e r w i t h approved T h i s mee t ing w i l l f ocus on a

3.4.3 Des ign Reviews

Des ign r e v i e w meet ings s h a l l be h e l d t o ensure t h a t t h e des ign o b j e c t i v e s a r e b e i n g ach ieved. A fo rma l r e v i e w w i l l be conducted a t t h e 90% comple te m i l e s t o n e . Buyer ’s d e s i g n r e v i e w team, a f t e r wh ich comments w i l l be fo rwarded t o t h e S e l l e r f o r d i s p o s i t i o n , i n c o r p o r a t i o n , and t r a c k i n g . I f necessary , meet ings s h a l l be h e l d t o ensure t h a t t h e des ign o b j e c t i v e s a re b e i n g ach ieved and t o r e s o l v e s i g n i f i c a n t comments i n a t i m e l y manner t o a l l o w f o r t h e comp le t i on o f t h e des ign t a s k . The 60% and 90% Des ign rev iews s h a l l be i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e work p l a n .

3.4.4 C o o r d i n a t i o n Mee t i ngs

C o o r d i n a t i o n meet ings , i n c l u d i n g te lephone conferences , w i l l be h e l d as r e q u i r e d , between t h e Techn ica l Represen ta t i ve and t h e S e l l e r t o d i s c u s s v a r i o u s s u b p r o j e c t i s s u e s as t h e y a r i s e . Mee t ing m inu tes w i l l be p repared by t h e S e l l e r and i ssued t o t h e meet ing p a r t i c i p a n t s w i t h i n 5 work ing days o f t h e mee t ing f o r r e v i e w and comments. Any o r a l communicat ions ( i n c l u d i n g te lephone con fe rences ) hav ing an impact on t h e work s h a l l be i ssued w i t h a c o n t r o l l e d r e c o r d number and ma in ta ined as s u b p r o j e c t r e c o r d s .

The S e l l e r shou ld a l l o w f o r a t e n work ing day r e v i e w by t h e

3.5 DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS

Record documents and c o n t r a c t documents w i l l be genera ted d u r i n g t h e cou rse o f t h e des ign . Record documents a r e those end- i tem documents r e q u i r e d by t h i s

6


SOW. C o n t r a c t documents a r e those documents i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e t a s k o r d e r agreement and t h i s SOW.

3.5.1 General Data

A l l d rawings from d e t a i l e d des ign s h a l l be p repared u s i n g t h e computer -a ided des ign and d r a f t i n g (CADD) process compa t ib le w i t h t h e AutoCAD.dwg d raw ing format. t h e i n t e n t o f t h e P r o j e c t t o p roduce a l l f i n a l e n g i n e e r i n g d raw ings i n compl iance w i t h t h e requ i remen ts d e f i n e d i n ICF KH Hanford A/E Standard , General Manual GG-DWG-01. D u r i n g t h e Des ign phase, t h e S e l l e r s h a l l implement c o s t - e f f e c t i v e compl iance t o t h e requ i remen ts o f GG-DWG-01. I f S e l l e r p r o p r i e t a r y s o f t w a r e i s used, t h e Buyer s h a l l have f r e e access t o i t a f t e r t h e des ign i s completed. A l l commercial s o f t w a r e u s e r r i g h t s w i l l be t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e Buyer on o r b e f o r e t h e p r o j e c t i s comple ted .

F u l l - s i z e drawings s h a l l be 71 by 102 cm (28 by 40 i n . ) . be 36 by 50 cm (14 by 20 i n . ) i f m u t u a l l y agreed upon by t h e Techn ica l R e p r e s e n t a t i v e and t h e S e l l e r . r e p o r t s can be 28 by 43 cm (11 by 17 i n . ) . Drawing s i z e s o t h e r t h a n those l i s t e d may be accepted on a m u t u a l l y agreed upon b a s i s . Reproduc ib les f o r d rawings s h a l l be f u r n i s h e d by t h e S e l l e r pend ing approva l by t h e Techn ica l Represen ta t i ve .

Any excep t ions s h a l l be i d e n t i f i e d and submi t ted f o r app rova l . It i s

Reduced d raw ings can

Drawings o r ske tches i n c l u d e d i n t o p i c a l

3.5.2 Document C o n t r o l

P r e p a r a t i o n , i d e n t i f i c a t i o n , app rova l , t r a n s m i t t a l , and f i n a l d i s p o s i t i o n of new and r e v i s e d r e c o r d documents s h a l l con form t o t h e S e l l e r ’ s e s t a b l i s h e d procedures o r s p e c i a l i n s t r u c t i o n s . Use o f c o n t r a c t documents s h a l l be c o n t r o l l e d i n accordance w i t h t h e S e l l e r ’ s e s t a b l i s h e d procedures o r s p e c i a l i n s t r u c t i o n s . The S e l l e r s h a l l i d e n t i f y i n t h e i r work p l a n t h e document c o n t r o l p rocedures i n tended f o r use.

3.5.3 Document I d e n t i f i c a t i o n and Format

The S e l l e r i s r e q u i r e d t o use a numbering system f o r a l l documents, i n c l u d i n g correspondence, t e c h n i c a l r e p o r t s , d rawings and s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , e t c . The numbering system w i l l be deve loped by t h e S e l l e r and concur red w i t h by t h e Techn ica l Represen ta t i ve . Numbering sequences f o r ske tches and d raw ings s h a l l be p r o v i d e d by t h e Techn ica l Represen ta t i ve .

Each r e c o r d document s h a l l have t h e f o l l o w i n g fo rma t :

P r o j e c t and c o n t r a c t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n

7


- SNF - P r o j e c t number, i f ass igned - C o n t r a c t number

O r i g i n a t i n g f i r m ’ s name

Document t i t l e

Document i d e n t i f i c a t i o n number (on each page)

R e v i s i o n o r addendum number o r l e t t e r (on each page w i t h r e v i s e d p o r t i o n o f page i n d i c a t e d )

Issue o r r e v i s i o n d a t e ( r e l e a s e d documents o n l y )

A u t h o r i z e d use stamp (e.g. , d r a f t , f o r app rova l , approved f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n , p r o p r i e t a r y i n f o r m a t i o n , s e c r e t )

T o t a l number o f pages and number o f each page (e.g. , page 1 o f 4 )

Tab le o f c o n t e n t s o r a t tachments (as needed)

Approva l s i g n a t u r e and t i t l e o f r e s p o n s i b l e person i n o r i g i n a t i n g f i r m ( r e l e a s e d documents o n l y ) .

3 .5 .4 Document Approva l

A l l des ign drawings and t e c h n i c a l documents submi t ted f o r r e v i e w s h a l l f i r s t be a p p r o p r i a t e l y rev iewed by t h e S e l l e r ’ s r e s p o n s i b l e t e c h n i c a l s t a f f i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , QA, s a f e t y , and d r a f t i n g checker pe rsonne l . Repor ts and documents s h a l l be checked f o r t e c h n i c a l and e d i t o r i a l accuracy b e f o r e t h e y a re submi t ted f o r any rev iew . F i n a l des ign drawings , r e p o r t s , and documents submi t ted f o r acceptance s h a l l be approved by t h e S e l l e r . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e f a b r i c a t i o n drawings , f a b r i c a t i o n s p e c i f i c a t i o n , and t h e e x c e p t i o n r e p o r t s h a l l be stamped by a p r o f e s s i o n a l eng inee r l i c e n s e d by Washington S t a t e . The S e l l e r s h a l l have w r i t t e n procedures i n p l a c e t h a t d e l i n e a t e t h e requ i remen ts f o r rev iew ing , check ing , t e c h n i c a l e d i t i n g , and approva l o f documents b e f o r e issuance. These procedures s h a l l be i s s u e d f o r r e v i e w and concur rence w i t h t h e document c o n t r o l p l a n .

Acceptance by t h e Techn ica l Represen ta t i ve i s t h e a c t o f r e v i e w i n g an a c t i v i t y o r document and acknowledg ing t h a t i t may be used f o r t h e purpose i n t e n d e d a t t h a t t i m e . f u t u r e changes w i l l n o t be r e q u i r e d , and does n o t convey o r i m p l y app rova l , o r assumption o f r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e a c t i v i t y o r document. The o r i g i n a t o r remains f u l l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a l l aspec ts o f t h e a c t i v i t y o r document; f o r f u l f i l l i n g a l l s p e c i f i c a t i o n s ; and f o r any o t h e r o b l i g a t i o n o r l i a b i l i t y o t h e r w i s e a r i s i n g under a s p e c i f i c a t i o n , agreement, o r c o n t r a c t .

Acceptance by t h e Techn ica l Represen ta t i ve does n o t ensure t h a t

8


3.5.5 Document Transmittal

Unless otherwise agreed upon, transmittal of record documents shall include one reproducible and 10 copies. (8 1/2 by 11 in.), full-size, photo-quality reproducibles shall be included. Transmittal of record documents produced electronically shall include indices that identify directory and data set file names. documented on a suitable, sequentially numbered form that contains a standard document identification number, distribution, and space for reviewers to note the disposition of 1 isted attachments in accordance with DOE Order 1324.2A, Records D i s p o s i t i o n (DOE 1988b) and the Seller Project document transmittal procedure. All final deliverables shall also be provided on an electronic file (e.g., CADD, ANSYS, WP5.1, etc.).

For documents larger than 21.6 by 27.9 cm

Transmittals shall be

3.6 RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES

Records shall be managed in accordance with the procedures submitted in the Seller's work plan. Records management shall include receipt, transmittal, processing, disposition, and storage requirements.

3.6.1 Record Files and Objective Evidence

Record files with current and previous revisions shall be maintained for record documents in accordance with the Seller's approved QA plan. At the conclusion of the design and fabrication phase, the Seller will be advised of the file's disposition. The Seller shall keep duplicate copies of data to meet code or legal requirements.

Objective evidence is test material and unreduced data that support record documents. Objective evidence includes, but is not limited to, material samples used in examinations and tests, instrument records, radiographs, and photographs. Unless needed for evaluation of a nonconformance or other special use, objective evidence will not be distributed. A "record only" transmittal should be issued with the objective evidence listed in the document index and retained with the record files.

3.7 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

The Seller shall identify the configuration management process for control and status of the Phase 2 Design. This process shall be identified in an update (as-needed) to the CMP that was prepared for Phase 1 Design and shall be submitted for review and approval. The CMP shall be developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in DOE Order 4700.1 and WHC-SD-SNF-CM-001.

9


3 . 8 QUALITY ASSURANCE

All work under this task order shall be performed in accordance with the Seller's ICF KH approved Quality Assurance Plan. comply with those sections of 10 CFR 71, subpart H, "Quality Assurance," that affect the particular tasks being performed. Initially, the program shall encompass those QA elements applicable only to design tasks. elements applicable t o follow-on services, such as fabrication support and inspection, will be added when options for these services are exercised.

The QA Program shall also

Other QA

3 .8 .1 Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)

The Seller shall submit for approval an update (as-needed) to the project- specific QAP that was prepared for Phase 1 Design which provides a description of the QA Program and how the QA requirements in Section 3.8 will be applied to the design work.

3.8.2 Quality Assurance Accessibility

The Seller shall provide access to all documents, files, and workstations for purposes of audit or surveillance of ongoing activities by the SNF Project and its designated agents. The Seller shall provide support, as requested, for audits or surveillances conducted by the Buyer, or the Buyer in conjunction with other project participants and specialists.

3 . 8 . 3 Corrective Action

The Seller shall be responsive to deficiencies identified by the DOE or SNF Project, via QA reports, corrective action reports, nonconformance reports, audit/surveill ance/management assessment reports, stop work orders, or reviews/evaluations. The Seller shall provide input data (i . e . , nonconformance report, corrective action report, audit findings, unsatisfactory surveillance) and develop a project quality trend program that identifies conditions adverse to quality.

3.8.4 Quality Assurance Matrix

The Seller shall develop a matrix of implementing procedures. shall be developed to demonstrate that each of the applicable requirements of ANSI/ASME NQA-1-1989 (ANSI/ASME 1989) and 10 CFR 71, subpart H, "Quality Assurance," have been addressed in the Seller's QAP and subsequent implementing procedures. This matrix is a controlled document and shall be annually updated to address requirements that have been changed, added, or deleted. the QAP.

This matrix

The QA matrix shall be submitted to the Buyer for concurrence with

10


3.8 .5 Quality Assurance Reporting

The Seller shall provide to the MCO Subproject Manager a monthly QA report. This report shall contain a status of the QA Program and include summaries of deficiencies that require corrective action, updates of corrective actions, audits performed and results, trend information, and key QA personnel changes. This report shall be submitted with the monthly activity report. information will not initially be required to be addressed until the Seller’s project quality trend program has had time to fully mature.

Trend

3.9 INDEPENDENT SAFETY PROGRAM

The Seller shall be responsible for satisfying all safety requirements imposed on the design by the criteria documents, safety and health protection requirements (i.e., nuclear safety, fire protection, industrial safety and hygiene, health physics, radiation protection engineering, etc.). Features o f the MCO which provide fuel containment and criticality control are considered Safety Class items per WHC- CM-4-46, Rev. 2 . The specific listing of Safety Class and Safety Significant components is included in the MCO Performance Specification.

This shall ensure compliance with

3.10 CHANGE CONTROL

Change control shall be managed in accordance with the MCO Project Management Plan (PMP), WHC-SD-W442-PMP-001, Rev. 0. The Seller shall track changes less than $50,000 and will be requested to maintain a log of all changes until the cumulative exceeds $50,000. Once the cumulative total of Seller changes exceeds the $50,000 threshold, the Seller shall submit a change request for approval.

4.0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRED SERVICES

The Seller is the fully responsible design agent for translating the MCO Subproject performance specification into a cost-effective final design. The tasks described in this section are those that the SNF MCO Subproject has specifically identified for the development of Phase 2 Design. The Seller may supplement this task list by adding new work items or upgrading definitions of identified tasks, as necessary, to satisfy its assessment of the tasks required to produce an acceptable Design that meets all technical and quality requirements.

11


4.1 Phase 2 Design Objectives

The overall objective is to produce final design media suitable for MCO procurement activities.

The principal objectives of the Phase 2 Design are as follows:

Provide a fabrication specification and fabrication drawings i n compliance with the Performance Specification that can be used for fixed price competitive procurement of the MCOs.

Document compliance with the Performance Specification requirements.

Provide input to the MCO Topical Design Report

4 . 2 DESIGN WORK ITEMS

The Seller is required to perform the following SNF MCO Subproject activities, at a minimum.

1. Review the Performance Specification and preliminary information provided for the SNF MCO Subproject, and identify those items or areas that require further clarification.

2 . Develop the prototype design into a final design and document compliance with Performance Specification requirements.

a.

b.

C.

Provide an update to the Fabrication Specification (WHC-S- 0453, Rev. 0) to reflect compliance with the Performance Specification and consistency with the Phase 2 Design drawings.

Provide a Phase 2 Design Report describing the MCO features, materials, components, quality characteristics, safety features, etc. Include a detailed matrix listing the specific design requirements included in the Performance Specification and indicating how the design has complied with each requirement.

Prepare, review, and approve an ASME code exception report to the Performance Specification where the levels of compliance are described, exceptions described, and levels of the exceptions justified against the Performance Specification MCO life cycle paths. Suitability of the lesser compliance levels will be compared to the active service interval in the MCO life cycle path.

12


3 , As part of the development of the Phase 2 Design of the MCO, the Seller may perform additional (not routine design) special studies/tasks as required or directed by the Technical Representative to evaluate alternatives and document design recommendations. Such studies shall be documented in topical reports that contain technical findings, tradeoffs, developments, analysis performed, recommendations, etc. prepared in accordance with applicable QA requirements such that content may be used as design input. A standard format shall be developed by the Seller with concurrence from the Technical Representative for use in preparing study reports. outline, including alternatives to be evaluated, work statements, decision hold points, and cost and schedule of each study, in the standard format, shall be submitted for approval.

Perform required shielding analyses and issue a report that documents the design's compliance with specification requirements. To ensure that standardized, validated methods are followed for shielding calculations, the Technical Representative will review and concur with the Seller's shielding design code(s). In addition, the Technical Representative will review and concur with source terms, bases for assumptions, and modeling done in support of shielding design to ensure that codes and the principles of "as low as reasonably achievable" have been properly applied. Shielding calculations may be reviewed by the Technical Representative before the Seller uses the calculated values in the design.

5. As requested, consult with and advise the Technical Representative concerning any questions that may arise in connection with the Seller services described within the contract. Participate in special study tasks, technical services, discussions, and meetings required on an "as-needed'' basis to support the SNF MCO design and development. Provide assistance with briefings and formal presentations, as requested. The estimated frequency of presentations i s one per month. Assistance shall include generation of briefing material (narratives, cost data, and graphics), participation in portions of the briefing, and responding to actions (via agreement/commitment documentation and meeting minutes) for which the Seller is made responsible.

a description of safety systems and components, human factors, and design criteria.

engineering reviews, audits and surveillances, and independent cost estimate reviews, as required.

The reports shall be

A detailed

4 .

6. Provide support in the development of a Topical Design Report with

7. Provide support for other special need items, such as independent

13

WHC-SD-SNF-SOW-001 R e v . 1

8. Superv i se p r e p a r a t i o n o f des ign , ana lyses , s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , r e p o r t s , and o t h e r i t ems such t h a t t h e f a b r i c a t i o n drawings , f a b r i c a t i o n s p e c i f i c a t i o n , and e x c e p t i o n r e p o r t a r e approved by a Pro fess iona l Eng ineer i n accordance w i t h methods p r e s c r i b e d under Washington S t a t e law.

components as f a b r i c a t e d and sh ipped t o t h e Han fo rd s i t e f o r use. The p l a n s h a l l address t h e f o l l o w i n g , a t a minimum:

9. Prepare a packaging, sh ipp ing , and warehouse p l a n f o r MCO’s and

a. I d e n t i f y p o t e n t i a l l o c a t i o n s f o r warehous ing o f MCO’s and components on s i t e .

b . D e f i n e package s i z i n g

c . warehouse env i ronments .

d . E s t a b l i s h a numbering c o n t r o l methodo logy

e . S p e c i f y s tandard packag ing i d e n t i f i c a t i o n

f. I d e n t i f y c l e a n i n e s s c o n t r o l requ i remen ts

I d e n t i f y r e q u i r e d cove r ings /packag ing s u i t a b l e f o r

C o o r d i n a t i o n and i n p u t f r o m t h e WHC M a t e r i a l C o n t r o l and Warehouse personne l on s i t e w i l l be r e q u i r e d i n o r d e r t o p repare t h i s p l a n . Packaging and s h i p p i n g requ i remen ts deve loped i n p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h i s p l a n s h a l l be r e f l e c t e d i n t h e f a b r i c a t i o n s p e c i f i c a t i o n .

11. I d e n t i f y and p r o v i d e des ign drawings f o r any s p e c i a l t o o l s and/or h a n d l i n g dev i ces f o r c l o s i n g t h e MCO o r movement o f t h e MCO’s and components d u r i n g s to rage . T h i s i n c l u d e s a means o f l i f t i n g an empty MCO i n t o t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n cask a t t h e CSB, b u t exc ludes g r a p p l e s f o r h a n d l i n g t h e loaded MCO, l o a d i n g baske ts i n t o t h e MCO, and p l a c i n g t h e s h i e l d p l u g i n t o t h e MCO.

14


I t e m S e l l e r WHC

Update t o Phase 1 P RIA C o n f i g u r a t i o n Manaaement P1 an

Schedule

w i t h i n 10 w o r k i n g days ANTP

M o n t h l y Repor t s , a c t i o n t r a c k i n g , weekly mee t ings Update t o Phase 1 Qua l i t y Assurance P1 an

F a b r i c a t i o n S p e c i f i c a t i o n

P i d e n t i f i e d I I I At r e v i e w s

Phase 2 F a b r i c a t i o n Drawings

P R 1 0 t h o f each month ANTP

P RIA W i t h i n 10 c a l e n d a r days ANTP

i d e n t i f i ed r e v i e w s

P RIA A t

S h i e l d i n g Analyses P RIA w i t h 90% Repor t r e v i e w I 1 I package S t r u c t u r a l Design C a l c u l a t i o n s

Phase 2 Design Repor t

Packaging, Sh ipp ing , and Warehouse P lan

ASME Code E x c e p t i o n Repor t

P RIA w i t h 90% r e v i e w package

i d e n t i f i e d r e v i e w s

r e v i e w package

i d e n t i f i ed r e v i e w s

P RIA A t

P R/A w i t h 90%

P RIA A t

S p e c i a l s t u d i e s P RIA 1 as schedu led


5.0 REFERENCES

10 CFR 71, Subpar t H, " Q u a l i t y Assurance," Code o f F e d e r a l Regu la t i ons , as amended.

ANSI/ASME, 1989, Q u a l i t y Assurance Program Requ i rements f o r N u c l e a r F a c i l i t i e s , ANSI/ASME NQA-1-1989, American N a t i o n a l S tandards I n s t i t u t e / American S o c i e t y o f Mechan ica l Eng ineers , New York, New York .

DOE, 1985, U n i f o r m R e p o r t i n g System, DOE Order 1332.1A, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE, 1987, P r o j e c t Management System, DOE Order 4700.1, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D . C .

DOE, 1988b, Records D i s p o s i t i o n , DOE Order 1324.2A, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

DOE-RL, 1990, " P r e p a r a t i o n and C o n t r o l o f Eng ineer ing and F a b r i c a t i o n Drawings , " HPS-SDC-1.3, Rev. 6, Han fo rd P l a n t S tandards , U.S. Department o f Energy-R ich land Opera t i ons O f f i c e , R ich land , Washington.

WHC, 1996, "Performance S p e c i f i c a t i o n f o r M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack," WHC-S- 0426, Rev. 2 , Westinghouse Hanford Company, R ich land , Washington

WHC, 1996, " P r o j e c t W-442 M u l t i - C a n i s t e r Overpack P r o j e c t Management P lan , " WHC-SD-W442-PMP-001, Rev. 0, West inghouse Hanford Company, R ich land , Washington

16


6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Clean Air Act o f 1977, 42 USC 7401, et seq.

DOE, 1993, Extension o f DOE N 4700.5, DOE N 4700.6, U.S. Department o f Energy, Washington, D.C.

National Environmental Policy Act o f 1969, 42 USC 4321, et seq.

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act o f 1976, 42 USC 6901, et seq.

RL, 1994, Project Cost Estimating, Analysis, and Cost Standardization, DOE RLID 5700.3, U.S. Department o f Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.

17


7 . 0 ACRONYMS

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

ANTP AWP CADD CMP CSB DO E F&R LLW MCO NRC PMB PMP PSEMP QAP RL ROM SNF sow

after Notice to Proceed in accordance with approved work plan computer-aided design and drafting Configuration Management Plan Canister Storage Building U.S. Department of Energy Function and Requirements low-level waste multi-canister overpack U. S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission performance measurement baseline Project Management Plan Project Systems Engineering Management Plan Qual i ty Assurance P1 an U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office rough-order-of-magnitude spent nuclear fuel Statement of Work

18

9. 10. Noes). xyO,+%/,, N/A - UNT Digital Library/67531/metadc...the containment vessel and internal...

Documents

Transcript of 9. 10. Noes). xyO,+%/,, N/A - UNT Digital Library/67531/metadc...the containment vessel and internal...