69910 Craig Dunphy Craig Dunphy Dissertation 3169742 829058583
Transcript of 69910 Craig Dunphy Craig Dunphy Dissertation 3169742 829058583
i
Understanding the Physical Characteristics of Elite Youth Soccer Players in Ireland
Craig Dunphy
A dissertation submitted in part of the requirement for the Bachelor of Business (Hons) Degree in Recreation and Sports Management
May 2020
Department of Sport and Exercise Science
School of Health Sciences
Waterford Institute of Technology
Supervisor: Chris Thompson
i
Statement of Originality and Ownership of Work
Department of Sport and Exercise Science
BB (Hons) Recreation and Sports Management
Name: Craig Dunphy I confirm that all the work submitted in this dissertation is my own work, not copied from any other person’s work (published or unpublished) and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment on any other course, in any other institution. Double click the following box and select ‘ticked’ to agree with above statement: Date: 04/05/2020 Student Number: 20075573 Address: 8 Fairfield Court, Belvedere Manor, Waterford Word processor word count: 7336
ii
Acknowledgements
Firstly, I would like to thank my Supervisor Chris Thompson for getting me through
the year. Our weekly 15 minute meetings to chat about the thesis that turned into
hours speaking about football, which was truly enjoyable . Thanks for getting me
through the year Chris and I hope having me in your first year of thesis supervision
in WIT wasn’t too much of a pain.
To Dr. Patrick Delaney, thanks so much for your advice throughout the year. Even
though you could wreck my head at some stages I knew you were putting me on the
right track and thanks for keeping me motivated throughout the SPSS and Covid 19,
your work doesn’t go unnoticed.
To Gary Hunt, Shane Nolan & Jamie Dalton and all Coaches and players from
Waterford FC for allowing me to conduct the research in this area, thanks so much
lads and best wishes for the season.
To my family, thank you so much for putting up with me for the year and supporting
me throughout my journey over the last 4 years.
To all the staff in the Department of Sport and Exercise Science thank you so much
for making it an enjoyable experience.
The Rec Man group of 2020, what a laugh this has been over the four years, I don’t
think there has been a day where I regret going to college or haven’t smiled, we lost
a few faces over the years but I have certainly made friends for life, Thanks Lads.
To the lads in the WIT Vikings Soccer club and Sports Office thank you so much for
getting me through the years with football and placement. I will never forget the
night in Home Farm when the CFAI cup came back to WIT.
To my 2nd, 3rd & 4th Readers, Derek, Barry and Brendan thanks for your eagle eye
and making sure it was perfect.
iii
Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii
Table of Contents iiiTable of Figures v
List of Tables vi
List of Abbreviations vii
Abstract viii
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Literature Review 3
2.1 Physical demands of Football 3
2.2 Demands of Youth Football: 4
2.3 How frequent are accelerations, change of direction and jumping in football match-play? 52.4 Differences in football-specific physical performance between academy age categories. 52.5 Physical Bias: 6
2.5.1 Physical Profile of Player 6
2.5.2 Relative Age Effect 7
3.0 Rationale 8
3.1 Research Question 1 8
3.2 Research Question 2 9
3.3 Research Question 3 9
4.0 Methods 94.1 Research Design 9
4.2 Participants 9
4.3 Procedures 10
4.3.1 Pre-Testing Procedures 10
4.3.2 Jumping Ability 10
4.3.3 Acceleration Abilities 11
4.3.4 Change of Direction 11
4.4 Data Analysis 125.0 Results 13
5.1 Introduction 13
5.2 Anthropometrics 13
5.3 Acceleration 14
iv
5.4 Jump 15
5.5 Agility 16
6.0 Discussion 18
6.1 Introduction 18
6.2 Differences in Anthropometric data between age groups 186.3 Difference in age categories and physical testing data 19
6.4 Difference in physical tests from other countries 21
6.5 Practical application, what does the data mean for practitioners? 22
6.6 Limitations 23
6.7 Conclusion 24
References 26
Appendix: 33
Appendix A: 33Appendix B: 34
v
Table of Figures Figure 1: Countermovement Jump………………………………………………….11
Figure 2: Modified agility test free (MATF) or (‘’T’’ Test) …………………….....12
vi
List of Tables Table 1: Weight……………………………………………………………………..13
Table 2: Height……………………………………………………………………...14
Table 3: 30m Acceleration …………………………………………………………15
Table 4: Countermovement Jump…………………………………………………..16
Table 5: Change of Direction ………………………………………………………17
vii
List of Abbreviations COD Change of Direction
CMJ Counter Movement Jump
AACMJ Arm Assisted Counter Movement Jump
SJ Squat Jump
UEFA Union of European Football Associations
FAI Football Association of Ireland
PDP Player Development Plan
CD Central Defender
WD Wide Defender
CM Central Midfielder
WA Wide Attacker
ST Striker
MSS Max Sprint Speed
MAS Max Aerobic Speed
KM Kilometres
FIFA Fédération Internationale de Football
Association
Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 Quarter 1,2,3,4
ETP Emerging Talent Programme
FA Football Association
MATF Modified Agility Test Free
SPSS Statistical Package for Social Science
viii
Abstract
Overview: The aim of this research was to understand the physical characteristics of
elite youth football players in Ireland using Vertical Jump Height, 30m Acceleration
and Change of Direction. The results will be compared to other nations globally to
see how Ireland compares to bigger countries.
Methods: This research was carried out using quantitative methods by using testing
procedure the population size was 65. All participants came from the same League of
Ireland club and played across four age groups (U13, U15, U17 & U19)
Results: The findings from the research found that the athlete’s performance across
Vertical Jump Height, 30m Acceleration and Change of Direction all improved as
the age group increased. The U19 had the most cluster score and the U15 had the
largest range of scores across the 3 tests.
Conclusion: As the athlete gets older their anthropometric scores increase and their
performance on the physical tests also improves. The new pathway for player
development here in Ireland shows that there is a pathway in Ireland to play
professional football when comparing the data in Ireland to data from professional
academies globally.
1
1.0 Introduction Football is an intense multi-directional and intermittent field sport which requires
high technical ability, tactical awareness and a high level of physical conditioning
(Wilson et al. 1995). Indeed, differences in physical performance are evident
between playing standards and age categories (Reilly et al. 2000). There are four
locomotor categories that define physical match demands: 1) standing; 2) walking;
3) low intensity running (these included both jogging and backwards running); and
4) high intensity running and sprinting. (Mohr et al. 2003). Previous research has
investigated the quantity of physical actions (e.g. total distance covered, high-
intensity running) performed in elite match-play (Mohr et al. 2003; Bangsbo et al.
1991; & Bangsbo, 1994), yet more specific actions (vertical jump height, change of
direction, acceleration) currently lack empirical evidence.
Strength and power have been shown to have a strong correlation with speed (5m,
10m & 20m acceleration) and change of direction (COD) ability (Rusell et al. 2017).
However, Strength and Conditioning coaches often prescribe programmes to
improve muscular power and translate that power into improvements in sprint and
COD ability. Previous research has suggested that strength, speed and COD ability
are physical match demands of football (Loturco et al. 2019). The importance of
elite athletes being monitored in speed, vertical jump and COD. Harley et al. (2010)
highlighted that there was an increase in velocity performance over five age groups
(U12 - U16) in an English academy using the flying 10m as a point of reference
throughout the research Faude et al. (2012) explicitly stated that straight line running
was the most used action demonstrated during goal scoring opportunities in the
German Bundesliga.
Despite the aforementioned literature, there is no known research on the physical
characteristics of football players in Ireland. There has been previous research
conducted in larger footballing countries such as Brazil who have a full-time
professional league for academies. For Ireland to progress on as a football nation to
compete at the top level the correct procedure must be in place to do so. Football is
the largest participation sport in Ireland at grassroots level with 4.1% of the
population take part (Woods et al. 2018). The Football Association of Ireland (FAI)
2
have introduced the League of Ireland (LOI) underage system in order to develop
players by creating the National League. Future research which provides data on
physical performance of youth Irish football players would provide normative values
on the physical demands in Irish football (which currently do not exist). It may aid
practitioners in identifying high and low physical performance values in youth
soccer players in Ireland. Therefore, the aim of the dissertation is to measure the
differences in vertical jump, acceleration and COD performance between four
different age groups (U13, U15, U17, U19) competing in a top-level League of
Ireland football club’s academy.
3
Prior to examining how jumping, acceleration and change of direction capabilities
vary between different age group football players within the League of Ireland, the
following literature review will give in detail the physical demands of football which
include several movements and there will also be a comparison between the several
different playing cohorts on the pitch.
2.0 Literature Review
2.1 Physical demands of Football Research has shown that the demands of elite football match-play are dependent on
multiple factors. These factors consist of (but are not limited to) physical capacity,
technical qualities, playing position, match tactics and quality of the opposition. A
study investigating an elite team competing in the UEFA Champions League and
Serie A (Mohr et al. 2003) illustrates four locomotor categories that define physical
match demands: 1) standing; 2) walking; 3) low intensity running (these included
both jogging and backwards running); and 4) high intensity running and sprinting.
According to DiSalvo et al. (2007), the average professional football player covers
an average distance of 10.86 km per match. In past research that focused on total
distance covered it was midfielders that covered the most distance within a football
match (Dellal et al. 2012, Guadino et al. 2012). Match play data in two of Europe’s
biggest competitions UEFA Champions League and La Liga shows that midfielders
cover a significantly greater amount of distance in a game compared to the defenders
and attacking players, Dellal et al. (2011). Due to a central midfielder being an
integral part of a team it is vital for them to cover every area of the pitch during a
match. DiSalvo et al. (2007) showed that using time motion analysis the central
midfielder covers over 12km in a game compared to a central defender who only
covers 10km. The central midfielder also ran at the highest intensity for the longest
period of time (11.1 km/h and 19 km/h). In the second half of games midfielders also
cover more distance by walking or jogging around the pitch. Although midfielders
have the greatest distance covered by high speed running all players cover over
10km in a game. Attackers perform shorter bursts of high speed running in a game,
but they cover less distance than a midfielder. This research has predominantly
described total distance covered and high-speed running as the significant factors
4
related to match-play performance yet has not considered acceleration as well as
other physical characteristics (e.g. jumping and change of direction) as a demand of
modern-day football (Dellal et al. 2011, DiSalvo el al. 2010, Bradley et al. 2009).
2.2 Demands of Youth Football: Soccer matches across the Republic of Ireland, under the guidance of the Football
Association of Ireland (FAI), are being performed in different formats depending on
age and development stage of the players. Until recently, youth soccer players
competed on a regular full-size pitch (110m x 65m) regardless of age or physical
development. In 2015 the FAI introduced the Player Development Plan (PDP) to
develop youth soccer in Ireland. The FAI introduced smaller pitches for younger
ages. For example, U10 players compete on a 90/70m pitch, with a transition to full-
size pitches (110/80m) in the U13 age category. The first time that the demand of
adult football correlates with the demand of youth football in Ireland is at under
fifteen level. A plausible relationship between player and relative pitch area per
player was noted by Catellano et al. (2015), with findings showing that higher match
demands were related to greater pitch size rather than a decrease of the number of
players per team. The FAI have also introduced different playing equipment between
different age groups. For example, all age groups use a size five football but there is
a weight difference, (270g, 320g, 370g and 450g). Future work should consider
measuring the match-running profiles of young players in different game formats
(i.e. 5v5, 7v7, 9v9, 11v11) across different age groups (i.e. 8-14 years).
This is a complex issue, but worthy of note is the evidence which is cited by Harley
et al. (2010) stated that as the athlete aged there was an increase in the performance
of their velocity threshold. This was based on 112 players across five different age
groups (U12-U16) from two professional soccer clubs in England. When examining
the age groups, a flying 10m velocity test was used. The U16 player scored the best
with a mean score of 1.31±0.06. As the players decreased in age the results of the
test decreased. The findings of this study would suggest that work rate profiles are
similar between age groups but as the athlete gets older a maturation kicks in the
performance becomes stronger. There isn’t enough academic research available on
jumping and change of direction.
5
2.3 How frequent are accelerations, change of direction and jumping in
football match-play? Worthy of note is the fact that there is match-play evidence which demonstrates the
frequency of those physical characteristic’s acceleration, change of direction and
jumping patterns. Empirical evidence from the German Bundesliga has demonstrated
that high-intensity straight line running is the most dominant action during goal
scoring opportunities (Faude et al. 2012). In this study, 83% of goals (from 298
analysed matches) were preceded by a power action (e.g. sprinting and jumping).
Moreover, the volume of high-speed running has been shown to be a distinguishing
factor between top-class players and those at lower level (Bangsbo, 2014). Change of
direction is also a common characteristic of a football match. It has been reported
that in the English Premier League, the average player makes approximately 700
turns during match-play, with around 600 being greater than 90 degrees (Bloomfield
et al. 2007). Similarly, Chaouachi et al. (2010) revealed there are 1300 changes of
activity in a football game (e.g. jumping, sprinting, shooting). Furthermore, a study
conducted within a talent program by the Greek Amateur Soccer Association
concluded that players average 16 jumps in a match with 9 of those contesting
headers in a 90-minute game (Gerodimos et al. 2006). This can vary with position,
with defenders more likely to complete headers. To summarise, match-play data has
reported that jumping, acceleration and change of direction are three vital
characteristics that are performed during match play. It is therefore important to train
these components in youth players in order to maximise the potential in their
physical development.
2.4 Differences in football-specific physical performance between
academy age categories. What follows is an outline of evidence which addresses the question that the stability
of the relationships between acceleration, COD and vertical jumps can vary between
players across professional playing standards (Los Arcos et al. 2017). Forty-two
senior players from the second and third Spanish Leagues performed numerous tests
in relation to jumping, acceleration and change of direction abilities. To test vertical
6
jump height, three tests were used; squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ)
and arm assisted CMJ (AACMJ). The results of the CMJ showed that there was a
range of 33.00-51.80cm. Within the study it also shows that there is a correlation
between acceleration and COD ability. When testing the acceleration, it was broken
down into three parts for the results 0-5m, 5-10m & 10-15m. There was a range of
2.15-2.53 in the 15m acceleration. The COD test is 5m bout and they can measure
the acceleration and deceleration of the athlete. The 15m acceleration test and the
505 COD test results are similar. The quickest 15m acceleration time was 2.15
meters per second (m/s) and the quickest 505 COD result was 2.32 m/s. When
broken down the same distance was covered between the two tests and less than 0.2
m/s was the difference between the two results even though during the COD the
athlete must stop and change direction.
Abbott et al. (2018) reported the position-specific variation in the physical demands
of match-play in an English Premier League Academy team. Thirty-seven U23
Premier League players (central defender (CD), wide defender (WD), central
midfielder (CM), wide attacker (WA) & striker (ST)). The data was collected using
GPS measurements over a two-season period with at least one match per week. The
results of the data showed that the CD produced the lowest total of both MSS and
MAS (7.4 ± 0.3). CM produced the highest total distance (11570 ± 420). This is
likely due to the fact that CM have a role of combining all positions on a pitch
together in a game situation. The WA produced the highest running speed (8.6 ±
0.4). The observational evidence demonstrates an advantage for older/more
physically developed players in favour of the concept that age has an effect of athlete
performance in a football specific setting.
2.5 Physical Bias:
2.5.1 Physical Profile of Player
Physical profiles of players can vary with age and position on the pitch. A study
conducted by Sporis et al. (2009) examined the physical profiles of 270 professional
soccer players from the Croatian Premier National League. The participants were
split into 4 groups in order of position (Goalkeeper, Defender, Midfielder &
Attacker). Initial body weight, height and body fat percentage were measured at the
7
beginning of the study. Furthermore, participants completed 5m, 10, 20m sprints,
CMJ, SJ and a VO² max test. The results showed that the goalkeepers were the tallest
and heaviest players in the team. They were also the slowest over 10m and 20m in
the team. Moreover, there was a difference between defender and attacker in vertical
jump height which the midfielders edged out by insignificant differences (Defender-
44.2±1.9, Midfielder- 44.26±2.1) by squat jump. The goalkeepers had the best
performance in the explosive power test (CMJ & SJ). Midfielders had significantly
greater VO² max test values. Goalkeepers had a physical advantage due to their size
in the physical test but when it came to the aerobic VO² max test the goalkeeper was
reduced due to the goalkeeper having a smaller aerobic capacity. It is important for
coaches to calculate the physical profile of a player to design specific training
programs for each position in order to maximise the overall fitness ability of each
player in order by position.
2.5.2 Relative Age Effect
The Relative Age Effect (RAE) is a phenomenon in which an athlete born close to a
cut off period in a year may have a physical and maturation advantage. The RAE
refers to the overall difference in age between individuals within each group, which
may result in significant performances (Barnsley, Thompson & Legault, 1992). Due
to their maturity state, players that are born in the first quarter of the year (January,
February & March) have a greater representation youth football teams compared to
those born in the final quarter (October, November & December). During a
longitudinal study over 21 seasons (Mukija et al. 2009), 189 players (aged 11-18)
were divided into four subgroups (Senior, Elite Youth, Regional Youth & Schoolboy
youth) and birthdate related to the four quarters of the year (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). Q1
made up most of the sample size with 46.6% born in Q1 compared to Q4, where
only 10% of the athlete’s part of the elite group were born. Similar research
(Finnegan et al. 2016) elaborated further in illustrating that in the first quarter of the
year RAE amongst players in Ireland is up around 38.2%. The participants of this
study were part of the youth elite section in Ireland who took part in the Emerging
Talent Program (ETP). The study took place across 12 different ETP centres in
Ireland across a six-year period. While it is evident that RAE does exist in the Irish
8
youth system, it is difficult to gauge an athlete's development throughout their
experiences as a youth.
3.0 Rationale As margins of increasing match day performance in elite youth athletes are lessening
due to advancements in training methods (in both pitch and gym-based sections), it
is vital for players to maintain the highest performance levels. The demands of the
game show the importance of movements such as running, jumping and change of
direction. Bloomfield et al. (2007) stated that players who play in the Premier
League change direction 700 times in a game. The average player jumps sixteen
times in a game with nine of those being contesting a header Gerodimos et al.
(2006). The LOI underage structure has only been in existence through four age
groups the last year (introduced in the 2019 season). However, there has been
research done in other countries (Los Arcos et al. 2017). A study like this is
completely novel in Irish football. In Ireland there is no professional underage set up
compared to the underage systems across England so effectively the participants in
this study would be classed as part time athletes and it is important to note that and
compare that to the results of professional youth athletes. Goal scoring can be
decided by short and explosive actions (Faude, O., Koch, T., & Meyer, T. (2012) and
it is therefore essential to train this in elite youth soccer players. Previous research
has quantified physical characteristics in elite youth soccer players in Brazil
examined age-specific development of vertical jump, straight line acceleration and
change of direction speed (Locturo et al. 2019). As the LOI is such a new and
emerging league, it is important to understand the physical characteristics of its
players. The information that is collected during this research will be useful to
compare youth Irish players to their counterparts from around the world.
3.1 Research Question 1
• What are the physical (Acceleration, Jumping and Change of Direction)
characteristics of Irish youth level football players?
9
3.2 Research Question 2
• Do the results in Acceleration, Jump and Change of Direction performance
vary between the different age groups?
3.3 Research Question 3
• Understanding how the average values in Ireland compare to the values of
other countries?
4.0 Methods
4.1 Research Design The present quasi-experimental study will compare jumping, acceleration and
change of direction capabilities between four different age groups (U13, U15, U17 &
U19) from a LOI Academy team and will also compare the data collected in Ireland
to data that has been collected from countries across the world (Spain, Slovakia &
Brazil). A convenient sample will be used during this testing. The study population
was chosen due to an elite level of the academy players. This type of sampling is
beneficial because a profile can be created around the results and future research
with a larger sample size can be conducted if appropriate. Prior permission has been
granted by the Head of the Academy to proceed with the testing. Each
participant/parent will be provided with a participant information sheet and informed
of data protection policies. The study protocol will take place over two days. The
first day will involve the U17 and U19 groups and the second day will involve the
U13 and U15. This will reduce participant numbers in the testing location and
minimise external distractions under testing conditions.
4.2 Participants The studies participants will consist of 60-80 underage elite youth soccer players in
Ireland who compete in the SSE Airtricity League (U13, U15, U17 & U19). The
players were recruited on convenient sampling by contacting the Head of the
academy of the local LOI club. The players from U15, U17 & U19 players would
have competed at the LOI level previously; however, it is the first step on the League
10
of Ireland pathway for the U13. They were previously exposed to grassroots level.
The U19, U17 & U15 player would have experienced competing at LOI level
previously, with some U19 level players being in the League of Ireland system since
the U15 age categories.
4.3 Procedures
4.3.1 Pre-Testing Procedures
The testing will be explained verbally, and each group will be given an example of
each test (CMJ, 20m Sprint and ‘’T’’ Test). Each participant that has taken part in
the testing was given a participation information sheet which gives them a written
explanation of each test which was performed so they are fully aware of the
procedures which has taking place. Before the testing will began, every athlete took
part in a controlled warm up to avoid injuries and to give each participant a level
playing field. Athletes performed a standardised warm-up which includes running at
a moderate intensity in order to increase heart rate followed by dynamic stretching
and movement that is related to the testing (i.e. Squat jump).
The order of assessments was as follows: 1) Counter Movement Jump; 2) Linear
speed acceleration (20m test with speed gates at 5m, 10m and 20m); 3) Change of
direction ability (‘’T’’ Test). Demonstrations of each test (CMJ, 20m Acceleration &
‘’T’’ test) will be provided by the researcher. On the day of testing each player
completed an online wellness questionnaire to measure the athlete’s mood, readiness
to train, tiredness and level of injury. All U15, U17 and U19 players took part in
previous testing and are familiar with the procedures involved in the tests. The U13
age group will be fully familiarised with the study protocol tests in order to achieve
an accurate result for the age group.
4.3.2 Jumping Ability
Vertical jumping ability was measured using the CMJ. A CMJ is where the jumper
starts from an upright standing position, makes a preliminary downward movement
by flexing at the knees and hips, then immediately extends the knees and hips again
to jump vertically up off the ground. Each athlete had three attempts at the jump
11
with fifteen seconds recovery between each jump for recovery. Jump height of the
CMJ will be determined by flight time using a contact mat (Chronojump,
Boscosystems, Spain).
Figure.1. Countermovement Jump (Cheraghi et al. 2017).
4.3.3 Acceleration Abilities
Speed gates (Witty Timing Systems, Microgate, Italy) were positioned at distances
0m, 5m, 10m and 30m along the course with 1.5m between the pair of speed gates as
a track. To avoid any environmental influences and provide reliable time
measurements, the acceleration test took place in an indoor court. The acceleration
was measured in three different distances along the track (0-5m, 5-10m and 10-30m).
In order to provide a mean time, the player repeated the test twice.
4.3.4 Change of Direction
The COD test was performed on a hard-indoor surface and consists of the “T” test.
To perform this test, one speed gate and three cones are required. The is placed 5m
perpendicular to the speed gates. The cones are placed in a horizontal line 2.5m
between each cone. The test begins with the athlete starting at the speed gate. The
participant then accelerates in a straight line and when reaching the cone, decelerates
and turns to the left, then accelerates and decelerates before they reach the cone in
order to turn and accelerate once again to the furthest cone 5m away. The athlete will
then accelerate 2.5m towards the middle cone and decelerate and turn left once and
accelerate through the speed gates.
12
.
Figure 2. Modified agility test free (MATF) or (‘’T’’ Test). (Los Arcos et al. 2017)
4.4 Data Analysis Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software was used to analyse all data
collected throughout this research. SPSS was used to determine the results between
the age groups. Then Microsoft excel was used to input the data in to receive a chart
output.
13
5.0 Results
5.1 Introduction This chapter provides a detailed and complete report of all data obtained during the
testing procedures in this research. The purpose of this chapter is to present a clear
explanation of the results.
5.2 Anthropometrics The anthropometric data is displayed Table 1. (Weight) and Table 2. (Height). The
data shows a steady increase in both weight and height between all age groups.
There is a strong correlation in both weight and height between U13 and U15 age
group players, there is also a strong relationship between the U17’s and U19’s in
both height and weight. The minimum weight for the U13’s and U15’s is similar
(U13 – 33.3kg & U15 – 34.0 kg).
Table 1. Weight data for all U13-U19
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
WeightKG
AgeGroup
Weight
U13 U15 U17 U19
14
Table 2. Height data for all U13-U19
5.3 Acceleration There is a linear association between age and acceleration. In the U13 30m
acceleration the scores were (4.64 ± 0.47 s). The median score for the U15 team
increases by 0.01 s but the standard deviation is lower (4.65 ± 0.36 s). The U13 and
U15 age groups are similar with the median result (U13 - 4.64±0.47 & U15 -
4.65±36). The U17 & U19 scores decrease over 0.25 s. As the players have not fully
developed at U17 the deviation is greater (4.35 ± 0.34 s) compared to the U19 who
scores are more clustered and the difference between the maximum and minimum is
considerably lower (4.21 ± 0.19 s).
135
145
155
165
175
185
195
Height(CM
)
AgeGroup
Height
U13 U15 U17 U19
15
Table 3. 30-meter acceleration data
5.4 Jump The CMJ scores increased with age. There is an association in age and CMJ
performance which gives the player a great jump height. The mean score is listed in
Table 4. The U13 have scored the lowest again (24.93 ± 5.13). The U15 are
marginally greater than the U13 (29.13 ± 8.05) but the deviation is greater at U15
compared to U13. The U17 (40.94 ± 5.2) also has a lower deviation compared to the
U15 but the deviation is still just greater than the U19 deviation. The U19 jumps
score is the largest and the jumps are clustered compared to the other teams and the
deviation is smaller (41.06 ± 5.06).
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
U13 U15 U17 U19
Time(Seconds)
AgeGroup
16
Table 4. Countermovement Jump data for all age groups
5.5 Agility As players get older the scores improve. This can be seen in Table 3, Table 4 and
Table 5. Table 3 shows there is a correlation between results between U13 & U15 as
well as U17 & U19. In the U13 ‘’T-Test’’ scores were (7.36 ± 0.56). The median
score for the U15 team decreases by almost 0.5 s but the standard deviation is greater
(6.78 ± 0.91). The U13 and U15 age groups are similar with the median age. The
U17 & U19 scores are similar with only 0.01 s the difference of the median score.
The U19 has a greater standard deviation (6.31 ± 0.6) compared to the standard
deviation of the U17 (6.32 ± 0.48).
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
U13 U15 U17 U19
Height(CM
)
AgeGroup
17
Table 5. Change of Direction data for all age groups
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.8
7
7.2
7.4
7.6
U13 U15 U17 U19
TIme(Seconds)
AgeGroup
18
6.0 Discussion
6.1 Introduction This section of the dissertation is a descriptive analysis and discussion of the results
collected over the duration of this research. This section will analyse the results in
depth and will be supported by previous research which was done in the literature
review chapter earlier.
The primary purpose of this dissertation was to get an understanding of the purpose
of physical characteristics of elite youth soccer players in Ireland with specific
attention being drawn towards jumping, straight line acceleration and change of
direction ability. The study adopted purely quantitative methods through the forms
of physical testing. The testing consisted of three tests. Countermovement Jump was
used for the jump scores, a 30m acceleration was used to calculate the players max
speed and the Modified agility test free (MATF) (Los Arcos et al. 2017) was used to
measure the players change of direction ability. Obtaining large amounts of data by
examining three tests across four different age groups (U13, U15, U17 & U19) this
allowed the researcher to conduct extensive testing. With the results inputted into
IBM SPSS Statistics. The output was then transferred to Microsoft Excel to create
the presentation table and give the researcher the output of results. The participants
from this study came from one LOI premier division side academy structure
(Waterford FC). The participants came from different age groups, U13, U15, U17
and U19.
6.2 Differences in Anthropometric data between age groups Gil et al. (2007) states that the maturation state of young players has been shown as a
selection factor, which leads to greater weight and height of the selected players as
compared with the unselected ones, giving prominence to the discussion of the
relative age and the potential impact on the future of these athletes. The findings
from previous research provided and mentioned that height, weight and body mass
increased as the athlete got older between the ages of 9-16 (Emmonds et al. 2018).
This research showed that as the player will progress through the age groups they
will develop into bigger and stronger players. The players from this study reported at
U19 (Height: 179.25 ± 8.75 cm & Weight: 74.5 ± 14.7 kg). The U19 age group
19
showed the lowest deviation out of the 4 age groups as the players have already been
through the maturation phase between the ages of 9-16 as stated previously by
Emmonds et al. (2018). The data collected in this research shows that the largest
deviations are between the U13 and U15 age groups (U13: Height: 156 ± 15.5 cm &
Weight: 47.2 ± 10.6 kg, U15: Height: 159.5 ± 16 cm & Weight: 53 ± 19.85 kg) The
U17 age group are similar to the U19 group where the players have mostly gone
through the main maturation and physical development phase as noted by Emmonds
et al. (2018). As there are still a small number of players just reaching the end of the
maturation phase there is a slightly larger deviation in the anthropometrics compare
to the U19 (U17: Height: 175.5 ± 10 cm & Weight: 67.6 ± 15 kg) but a smaller
deviation when comparing to the U13 and U15. Differences in height and body mass
are associated with increased maturity with increasing chronological age, along with
the biological, morphological, hormonal and neurological changes that occur during
this period of development (Ford et al. 2011). Previous research conducted by
Loturco et al. (2019) states anthropometrics of 3 age groups (U15, U17 & U20) of
football players who were part of two professional football clubs in Brazil. Loturco
states that (U15: 61.8 ± 7.3 kg; 172.6 ± 6.3 cm, U17: 64.8 ± 7.3 kg; 176.3 ± 8.3 cm
& U20: 73.4 ± 9.3 kg; 178.2 ± 9.6 cm). When comparing the finding from this study
to the data collected in Ireland there isn’t a significant difference between the
anthropometrics data from Ireland and Brazil at U17 as well as comparing the U19
from Ireland and the U20 from Brazil. However, there was a notable difference
between the anthropometrics at U15 age group between Ireland and Brazil. The Irish
players are a lot less physically developed when comparing them to the Brazilian
athletes. As the development of every child is different the anthropometric results
will fluctuate more at the younger age groups and as the athlete gets older there will
be less of a difference between the data.
6.3 Difference in age categories and physical testing data The data from the physical testing shows that there is a difference between all four
age groups in each of the three tests. The whole data scores increased as the players
did with age. At U13 the CMJ was the lowest out of the four age groups and this
trend continued throughout each of the three tests. There was also a difference in the
standard deviation for each of the tests. In the 30m ACC the standard deviation
20
decreased between the age group but the same cannot be said for the CMJ and the
COD tests. In the CMJ the U13 (24.93 ± 5.13) and when it is compared to the U15
CMJ (29.13 ± 8.05), the standard deviation increases in the U15 while the jumps
increase. There is justification to show why the deviation is great at the U15 age
group compared to the U13. The Relative Age Effect (RAE) comes into play at the
U15 age group as a lot of the players are born in Q4 of year two in the U15 age
group which really makes them U14. They are closer to the U13 age group in
anthropometric whereas the more physical and older athletes involved in the U15 age
group could pass as an U17 athlete with the data produced.
The U17 and U19 scores for the CMJ (U17 40.94 ± 5.20 & U19 41.06 ± 0.19)
showed that once the athlete develops and matures physically the data scores reduce
in the standard deviation, but it also increases the median score achieved by the age
group. In the COD the median score decreased as the age group increased. As
expected, the U13 were by far the slowest in this test with the median time over half
a second slower than the U15. The standard deviation for the U13 was lower than the
U15 but the slowest score was still at U13 level. (U13 7.36 ± 0.53 & U15 6.78 ±
0.91). The same can be seen when comparing the U17 & U19 (U17 6.32 ± 0.48 &
U19 6.31 ± 0.60). The median score decreased by 0.01 of a second between the U17
and U19 but the deviation increased by 0.12 of a second for the U19 compared to
U19. There is a bigger gap between the results of the U19 compared to the U17
where the results are more clustered. Examining the 30m ACC test the trend that is
seen in the CMJ and COD test is seen in the U17 and U19 but in the U13 and U15
the median score increases by 0.01 of a second for the U15 compared to the U13, the
deviation increases in the U13 scores by 0.11 of a second. (U13 4.64 ± 0.47, U15
4.65 ± 0.36, U17 4.35 ± 0.34 & U19 4.21 ± 0.19). When analysing the data in the
League of Ireland club there was a notable difference in the performance of results
between the U15 and U17. The U17 squad scored significantly better in each of the
three tests. This is where the most notable difference was between each of the four
age groups. This could be due to the U15 squad’s majority being born later in the
year compared to the U17 squad where many of them are born in Q1, Q2 & Q3 of
year one for the U17 age group. The age gap in some of the players is 3 years and
this causes the U17 anthropometrics to be greater, but they are also more mature
compared to their U15 counterparts.
21
6.4 Difference in physical tests from other countries As the LOI is not a fully professional set up with the majority of first teams being
professional the academy structure in Ireland is run on a very semi-professional
basis. The original idea for this research was to examine whether or not elite youth
soccer players could stay in Ireland for their youth development and then when they
receive their education, they can make the step into professional football around the
world. Three countries were examined across the world and they were all compared
with Ireland in the following three tests, 30m ACC, CMJ and COD. The three
countries two of which are in Europe (South Europe and Central Eastern Europe) as
well as a country from South America. Each country has conducted at least one of
the tests that were conducted in an Irish context. As noted in research question 3 it is
important to understand the average values in these other countries who have full
time professional leagues as well as professional academies and compare them to the
semi-professional academies in Ireland. 30m ACC times in Ireland at U19 level
ranged between 4.21 ± 0.19 seconds, this test was compared to research which was
conducted by the Slovakian FA with the U21 squad who were preparing for a major
European championship at the time and the majority of the athletes involved in the
squad were involved with full time professional academies in Slovakia. The
Slovakian national team averaged a score of 4.59 second for the 40m ACC
(Pivovanrnicek et al 2014). When comparing these two countries in the Acceleration
test Ireland was conducted over 30m where the Slovakian test was conducted over
40m. There was a difference in scores by 0.39 of a second, when comparing the
scores at different distances the result is what you could expect with the addition of
an extra 10m to the Slovakian test. As the players are at max speed at 30 m the extra
0.39 second onto the 30m would be the equivalent if the Slovakian test was done at
30m.
When comparing the averages on the CMJ data Ireland will be compared with a
South American country in Brazil. The testing in Brazil was done with an U20 squad
so the data will be compared with the U19 CMJ data in Ireland. The U19 data from
Ireland shows that they have an average jump height of 42.42cm and the Brazilian
data shows that they average 41.91cm. The data from Ireland shows that Ireland has
a greater performance in CMJ height. Jump height is an important movement in
22
football for the action of heading if an outfield player or leaping to catch the ball if
the athlete is a goalkeeper. The data from Ireland shows that there is a difference of
0.51cm compared to the Brazilians. The Brazilian data comes from a professional
club which has a full-time academy. As the Irish data comes from a semi-
professional academy set up it shows that Irish players are more than capable of
progression through the Irish system and then making the move to professional
football in Ireland or around the world.
In context of answering the question asked, specific attention will focus on the U19
results and they will be compared to the results of a professional academy set up in
Spain. There is over a one second difference when comparing the academy from
Ireland to the academy from Spain. The U19 data from Ireland are significantly
slower over the Modified agility test free (MATF) (Los Arcos et al. 2017). The
scores from Ireland had a median of (6.31 ± 0.60s) being the deviation between the
results. The Spanish academy came in with times of (4.91 ± 0.16s). The Spanish
deviation is a lot lower than the deviation from Ireland. Out of the three tests
conducted in the professional academy in Ireland the Change of Direction is the only
test that there is a significant gap in the test scores when comparing them to another
professional academy in Spain. What was noticeable is that none of the athletes in
Ireland get close to the range of the Spanish academy (4.47 – 5.29). The quickest
time from Ireland in the MATF test was 5.71s. The Irish academy is 0.42 seconds
behind the slowest from the Spanish academy. If an athlete from Ireland wants to
make the step form underage academy football to professional football across the
world the MATF times must improve significantly to give the athlete any chance of
making it in the professional game at the top level.
6.5 Practical application, what does the data mean for practitioners? How can the data collected during this research be of use to practitioners? Most
importantly the data can be used each season to monitor the athlete’s performance
throughout the season as well as the athlete’s progression through the age groups in
LOI. As the research conducted has never been conducted before in this particular
League of Ireland club it would be worthwhile keeping record of the data collected
from the U13 team and see how the results improve in their League of Ireland
journey and see how many of the athletes that enter the system at U13 progress
23
through the age groups to U19 level and the onto professional football whether that
is in Ireland or across the world. It can also show that having a national level
competition at underage level can show the development system in Ireland can be a
progression for a player looking to make it as a full time professional. It can show a
natural ladder for players to come into the system early and go the whole way while
getting a full-time education in Ireland if professional football doesn’t work out for
the athlete. Previously players from Ireland looking to make it as a professional had
to go to England because the professionalism of the LOI wasn’t there, the player
would leave school at 16 without a full education and move to a different country to
play football. If it didn’t work out for that player they would return home to Ireland
with no education looking for work but now the LOI underage system is in place to
show that there is a chance of making a professional in Ireland and there is a backup
plan there in case football doesn’t work for that player. The data can be used by
Coaches, Strength and Conditioning, Sport Science, Academy Directors and also
parents to show that the FAI are making huge steps in elite underage football and
show that there is a pathway to professional football for these academy athletes.
6.6 Limitations There are always limitations in research or else there would be no need for research.
A limitation of this study was the sample size was not equal between the age
groups.The validity of a study would have improved in strength if there was an equal
number of players involved in the testing procedures from this club, but this was due
to player availability on testing days. When analysing the data another limitation
could be that the research was only done within one club, one club does not represent
the whole country or league. To get more reliable data testing could have been done
in four clubs across Ireland, North, East, South and West. If the research was
conducted in this manor the data would more accurately represent the whole country.
Each test was used using professional equipment like the Chronojump mat by
Boscosystems and the Whitty Timing system by Microgate. All tests were conducted
2/3 times and the best score was taken in case there was a poor performance by the
athlete who was taking part in the test. As the athletes were elite underage players
and were part of a semi-professional environment the data will differ to data that is
collected from a club that has a fully professional academy with proper
24
infrastructures in place to make the elite youth into professional footballers. As the
athletes involved in this research are not professional athletes their physical
performance will improve immensely over the years in the underage structure of
LOI. As the academy was run on a semi-professional basis all the testing was done in
the evening time. A review conducted by Cappaert (1999), shows how the time of
day can affect an athlete’s performance. As the players are also in full time education
from 9am – 4pm fatigue can come into play ideally the player would want to be fresh
when undertaking the test to achieve maximum performance in all tests. All
participants were given the same familiarisation of each test and each one was
demonstrated so the participant fully understands what they have to do. There was an
open-door policy so if the player had any issues or queries, the participant could ask
them, and answers would be provided to help the participant achieve maximum
performance. There is also a lack of academic research done on understanding the
physical characteristics in elite youth soccer, especially in Ireland. This is a pilot
study and it definitely requires future research to see how the FAI compares to other
big footballing nations across Europe and the world. The FAI have been focused on
player pathway and coach education and there are structures in place for these but
physical characteristics are also crucial to development for a young footballer so this
area should be researched further in a Irish context, to help improve the standard of
Irish players as well as create a more improved pathway for players in Ireland and so
that they don’t have to look abroad
6.7 Conclusion This research provides novel findings which demonstrate the physical characteristic
of elite youth football players that compete in the LOI. The results show that
physical characteristics of soccer players improve with age with the 3 specific
movements that were examined. These findings provide a reference point for future
studies that can be undertaken in a larger context in Ireland. Research in the future
could be undertaken that looks at the pathway of a player that enters the system at
U13 and makes the steps the whole way through the system to U19. Monitoring the
players arthrometric, physical characteristic movements and development of a player
throughout the LOI pathway from U13 to U19 will be the best gauge of to see how
successful the system is and then from there comparing the system to other set up in
25
different countries that use national leagues for youth development. As the national
league is regionalised into North and South future studies could compare data from
the north and south. Time of year the study has been done could also be as the study
here was conducted in February (Pre-season for LOI, Summer Football) if the study
was done in a traditional season in August (Winter Football) would the data and
results shown vary. For more clear-cut evidence on the importance of physical
characteristics and anthropometrics data should be collected throughout the season to
monitor the athlete’s performance throughout the season.
26
References Abbott, W., Brickley, G., & Smeeton, N. J. (2018). Physical demands of playing
position within English Premier League academy soccer. Journal of Human Sport
and Exercise, 13(2). doi: 10.14198/jhse.2018.132.04.
Arcos, A. L., & Yanci, J. (2017). Specificity of jumping, acceleration and quick
change of direction motor abilities in soccer players. Kinesiology, 49(1), 22–29. doi:
10.26582/k.49.1.12.
Bangsbo, J. (1994). The physiology of soccer – with special reference to intense
intermittent exercise. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica,
Bangsbo, J., Nørregaard, L. and Thorsøe, F. (1991). Activity profile of competition
soccer. Canadian Journal of Sports Science, 16, 110–116.
Bangsbo, J. (2014). Physiological demands of football. Sports Science Exchange,
27(125), 1-6.
Bradley, P. S., Carling, C., Archer, D., Roberts, J., Dodds, A., Mascio, M. D., …
Krustrup, P. (2011). The effect of playing formation on high intensity running and
technical profiles in English FA Premier League soccer matches. Journal of Sports
Sciences, 29(8), 821–830. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.561868.
Barnsley, R. H., Thompson, A. H., & Legault, P. (1992). Family planning: Football
style. The relative age effect in football. International Review of Sport Sociology, 27,
78-87.
27
Bloomfield, J., Polman, R. & P, O’Donoghue (2007). Physical Demands of Different
Positions in FA Premier League Soccer. Journal of Sport Science Medicine, 6(1):63-
70.
Cappaert, A. T. (1999). Review: Time of Day Effect on Athletic Performance: An
Update, Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 13(4), 412–421
Castellano, J., Puente, A., Echaezarra, I., & Casamichana, D. (2015). Influence of the
number of players and the relative pitch area per player on heart rate and physical
demands in youth soccer. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(6),
1683-1691
Capranica, L., Tessitore, A., Guidetti, L. and Figura, F. (2001). Heart rate and match
analysis in pre-pubescent soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19:379-384.
Chaouachi, A., Manzi, A., Wong del, P., Chaalali, A., Laurencelle, L., Chamari, K.
& Castagna, C. (2010) Intermitting endurance and repeated sprint ability in soccer
players. Journal Strength Conditioning Research. 24: 2663-2669.
Cheraghi, M., Sarvestan, J., Sebyani, M., & Shirzad, E. (2017). Stretch-Shortening
Cycle in Countermovement Jump: Exclusive Review of Force-Time Curve Variables
in Eccentric and Concentric Phases.pp.3 doi: 10.20944/201708. 0070.v1.
Dellal, A., Owen, A., Wong, D., Krustrup, P., Exsel, M. V., & Mallo, J. (2012).
Technical and physical demands of small vs. large sided games in relation to playing
position in elite soccer. Human Movement Science, 31(4), 957–969. doi:
10.1016/j.humov.2011.08.013.
28
Dellal, A., Chamari, K., Wong, D. P., Ahmaidi, S., Keller, D., Barros, R., …
Carling, C. (2011). Comparison of physical and technical performance in European
soccer match-play: FA Premier League and La Liga. European Journal of Sport
Science, 11(1), 51–59. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2010.481334.
DiSalvo, V., Baron, R., Tschan, H., Calderon Montero, F.J., Bachl, N. & Pigozzi, F.
(2007). Performance Characteristics According to Playing Postion in Elite Soccer.
Internation Journal of Sports Medicine. 28, 222-227 doi:10.1055/s-2006-924294.
Domene, Á. M. (2013). Evaluation of movement and physiological demands of full-
back and center-back soccer players using global positioning systems. Journal of
Human Sport and Exercise, 8(4), 1015–1028. doi: 10.4100/jhse.2013.84.12.
Emmonds, S., Till, K., Redgrave, J., Murray, E., Turner, L., Robinson, C., & Jones,
B. (2018). Influence of age on the anthropometric and performance characteristics of
high-level youth female soccer players. International Journal of Sports Science &
Coaching, 0(0) 1-8, doi:10.1177/1747954118757437
Faude, O., Koch, T., & Meyer, T. (2012). Straight sprinting is the most frequent
action in goal situations in professional football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(7),
625–631. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.665940
Finnegan, L., Richardson, D., Littlewood, M. & McArdle, J. (2016). The influence
of data and place of birth on youth player selection to a National Football
Association elite development programme, Science and Medicine in Football,
doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1254807
29
Ford, P., De Ste Croix, M., Lloyd, R., Meyers, R., Moosavi, M., Oliver, J., &
Williams, C. (2011). The Long-Term Athlete Development model: Physiological
evidence and application. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(4), 389–
402. doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.536849
Gil, S., Ruiz, F., Irazusta, A., Gil, J. & Irazusta, J. (2007). Selection of young soccer
players in terms of anthropometric and physiological factors. Journal Sports
Medicine and Physical Fitness, 47, 25–32
Harley, J. A., Barnes, C.A., Portas, M., Lovell, R., Barrett, S., Paul, D., & Weston,
M. (2010). Motion Analysis of match play in elite U12 - U16 age group soccer
players. International Journal of Sport Science, 28(13), 1391-1397.
doi:/10.1080/02640414.2010.510142
Hunter, F., Bray, J., Towlson, C., Smith, M., Barrett, S., Madden, J., … Lovell, R.
(2014). Individualisation of Time-Motion Analysis: A Method Comparison and Case
Report Series. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(01), 41–48. doi:
10.1055/s-0034-1384547.
Krustrup, P., Mohr, M., Amstrup, T., Rysgaard, T., Johansen, J., Steensberg, A., …
Bangsbo, J. (2003). The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test: Physiological Response,
Reliability, and Validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35(4), 697–705.
doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000058441.94520.32.
Los Arcos, A., Mendiguchia, J. & Yanci, J. (2014). Specificity of Jumping,
Acceleration and Quick Change of Direction Motor Abilities in Soccer Players.
Journal of Kinesiology, 1, 22-29
30
Loturco, I., Jeffereys, I., Cal Abad, C., Kobal, R., Zannetti, V., Pereira, L. &
Nimphus, S. (2019). Change of Direction, speed and jump performance in soccer
players: a comparison across different age categories. Journal of Sport Sciences,
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1574276
Mendez-Villanueva, A., Buchheit, M., Simpson, B., & Bourdon, P. (2012). Match
Play Intensity Distribution in Youth Soccer. International Journal of Sports
Medicine, 34(02), 101–110. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306323.
Mohr, M., Krustruo, P. & Bangsbo, J. (2003). Match performance of high-standard
soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue. Journal of Sport
Science, 21:7, 59-528 doi: 10.1080/0264041031000071182
Mujika, I., Vaeyens, R., Matthys, Stijn P.J., Santiseban, J., Goiriena, J. &
Philippaerts, R. (2009). The relative age effect in a professional football club setting,
Journal of Sport Sciences, 27:11, 1153-1158. doi: 10.1080/02640410903220328
Osgnach, C., Poser, S., Bernardini, R., Rinaldo, R., & Prampero, P. E. D. (2010).
Energy Cost and Metabolic Power in Elite Soccer. Medicine & Science in Sports &
Exercise, 42(1), 170–178. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181ae5cfd.
O’Donoghue, P., Rudkin, S., Bloomfield, J., Powell, S., Cairns, G., Dunkerley, A.,
… Bowater, J. (2005). Repeated work activity in English FA Premier League soccer.
International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 5(2), 46–57. doi:
10.1080/24748668.2005.11868327.
Pivovarnicek, P., Pupis, M., Tonhauserova, Z. & Martina, T. (2014). A level of
running speed of elite young soccer players at different positions, International
Scientific Journal, 8, 21-26.
31
Reilly, T., Bangsbo, J., & Franks, A. (2000). Anthropometric and physiological
predispositions for elite soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9), 669–683.
doi:10.1080/02640410050120050
Russell, M., Shearer, D., Cook, C., & Kilduff, L. (2017). Predictors of Linear And
Multidirectional Acceleration In Elite Soccer Players, Journal of Strength
Conditioning Research.
Salvo, V. D., Baron, R., Tschan, H., Montero, F. C., Bachl, N., & Pigozzi, F. (2007).
Performance Characteristics According to Playing Position in Elite Soccer.
International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28(3), 222–227. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-
924294.
Sporis, G., Jukic, I., Ostojic, S. & Milanovic, D. (2009). Fitness Profiling in soccer:
Physical and Physiologic Characteristics of Elite Players. Journal of Strength and
Conditioning, 23(7): 1947-1953
Stroyer,J., Hansen, L. and Klausen, K. (2004). Physiological profile and activity
pattern of young soccer players during match-play. Journal of Sports Sciences,
36(1):168-174
V. Gerodimos, V. Manou, P. Iakimidis, S. Perkos & S. Kellis. (2006). Vertical
jumping ability in elite young soccer players. Journal of Human Movement Studies.
51: pp.89-101.
Wilson, G.J., Lyttle, A.D., Ostrowski, K.J., & Murphy, A.J. Assessing dynamic
performance: a comparison of rate of force development tests. Journal of Strength
Conditioning, Res 9(3): 176-181, 1995.
32
Woods, C.B., Powell, C., Saunders, J.A., O’Brien, W., Murphy, M.H., Duff, C.,
Farmer, O., Johnston, A., Connolly, S. & Belton, S. (2018). The Children’s Sport
Participation and Physical Activity Study 2018 (CSPPA 2018). Department of
Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland,
Sport Ireland, and Healthy Ireland, Dublin, Ireland and Sport Northern Ireland,
Belfast, Northern Ireland.
33
Appendix: Appendix A:
13th January 2020
Re: Craig Dunphy
To whom it concerns,
Waterford FC are delighted to be able to be in a position to assist your student Craig Dunphy for this Thesis. Craig is looking to carry out research with our Academy players and as soon as we have them all signed up for 2020 season, we will be working closely with Craig to assist him with this.
We are always delighted to work in collaboration with WIT students as they complete their studies. Many thanks for your continued good work with the students whom have gone on to become coaches within Waterford FC, including myself.
As Head of Academy I will be monitoring each players progression throughout the season closely and I am aware with GDPR rules and regulations that once the season has finished that the data will be destroyed.
Kind Regards,
Gary Hunt
Head of Youth Development
Waterford FC
Waterford FC: Club Secretary: Email: Phone:
WATERFORD FOOTBALL CLUB
Regional Sports Centre, Cork Road, Waterford.
Ireland.
34
Appendix B:
Participant Consent Form:
I Craig Dunphy am in my final year of a Level 8 Honours Degree in Bachelor of Business in Recreation and Sports Management in Waterford Institute of Technology. As part of my final year I must undertake and complete a Thesis/ Dissertation.
The aim of this research is to Understand the Physical Characteristic of Elite Irish youth soccer players using three testing method. Acceleration, Jumping and Change of Direction. I will be comparing the results across four age groups, U13, U15, U17 & U19.
This is a quasi-experimental study, which will include a Countermovement Jump to measure Jumping ability, a 20m Acceleration will be used to measure Acceleration and the Modified agility test free (MATF) or (‘’T’’ Test) will be used Change of Direction.
1. I confirm that I fully understand the study and am willing to cooperate to the best of my own potential.
2. I Understand that my participation in voluntary and can leave the study at any stage.
3. I understand that neither that myself (Craig Dunphy) nor Waterford Institute of Technology are not responsible if any injury occurs during testing.
Signature of Participant:
Signature of Researcher:
X
X