5 - Transportation Planning Concept

32
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONCEPT

description

transportation

Transcript of 5 - Transportation Planning Concept

  • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONCEPT

  • DEFINITION OF PLANNING

    Conyer and Hill, 1984

    a continuous process which involves decisions, or choices, about alternative ways of using available resources, with aim achieving particular goals at some time in the future.

    Sujarto, 1985

    The efforts to use all available resources that observe all limitations to accomplish a purpose in efficient and effective.

  • The Essential Element of Planning

    Timescale and Phasing

    Calculation and Rational Analysis

    Repetition Process (Feedback)

    Cost-Benefit Evaluation

    Coordination and Flexibility of changes

  • Planning Process

    Goals, Objectives,

    Targets

    Planning

    Alternative Planning

    Assessment

    Best Alternative

    Designing

    Implementation

    Monitoring and Evaluation

    DATA

    DATA

    DATA

    DATA

  • Purpose of Transportation Planning

    Preventing unexpected problem that occur in the future (preventive action)

    Looking for any solution (problem solving)

    Serving the transportation demand optimally and balanced

    Preparing for action or policy to respond the future

    Optimizing the used of carrying capacity (resources), that including of limited funds as optimal as possible, to achieve the goals or plans with maximum

  • Macro Transportation Planning

    Activity System(Transport Demand)

    Movement System(Traffic)

    Network System(Transport Supply)

  • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING CONCEPT

    Basic relationship between micro transportation

    system can be combine in many sequence steps,

    as follows :

    Accessibility and Mobility

    Traffic Generation

    Traffic Distribution

    Mode Choice

    Imposition of Network

    Dynamic Traffic Flow

    Modeling Transportation

    four stages

  • Accessibility and Mobility

    Accessibility : a concept that combine a management system of land use geographically with transportation network system that connected them.

    Land use changes will cause many zones and different geographic in another place between the zones will be easily to connectedwhen there is the provision of infrastructure or transportation facilities.

  • Accessibility : measurement of comfortability or simplicity in one location can be achieved by a network transportation system (transportation and infrastructure)

    Comfortability and simplicity is subjective, qualitative, and relative.

    Comfortability and simplicity influenced by:

    Distance

    Time

    Cost

  • Distance : as closer the distance, as higher the accessibility

    Time : as shorter the travel time, as higher the accessibility

    Cost : as cheaper the cost, as higher the accessibility

    Distance

    FarLow

    AccessibilityMedium

    Accessibility

    NearMedium

    AccessibilityHigh

    Accessibility

    Infrastructure Condition Poor Good

  • Accessibility Quantification

    (Black, 1981)

    Hi = Accessibility from origin zone I to destination zone j

    Ldj = Size of activity in zone j

    Tij = Limited factor from origin zone i to destination zone j

    n = Number of destination zone

  • Mobility

    The size of capability or simplicity to travelling

    Expressed by capability to pay transport fee.

  • Relationship between Accessibility - Mobility

    Accessibility increasing, will mobility increase?

    Mobility increasing, will accessibility increase?

    Invest in the transportation system, will mobility increase ?

  • Trip Generation

    Stages of modeling that predicting the number of movement that comes from a land use (origin zone i) or the number of movement that led to another Land Use (destination zone j)

  • Trip generation :

    Trip production : number of movement (people/goods/vehicles) that coming out/ awakened from an origin zone .

    Trip attraction : number of movement (people/goods/vehicles) that entering/ attracted to a destination zone .

    i j

  • Trip Generation influenced by :

    Type of Land Use

    Intensity of Land Use

    Different types of land use affected on :

    Number of movement that generated / attracted

    Type of traffic that generated / attracted

    The timing generation/attraction of movement

  • Example of the differences in generation and attraction due to type of Land Use

    The difference of movement numbers

    the number of movement = f (parameters soc-ec)

    Land Use Average of movement per

    100m2

    Number of study

    Supermarket 136 3

    Fast-food Restaurant 595 6

    Office 13 22

    Hospital 18 12

    Industrial Areas 5 98

    Source : Black (1978)

  • Example of the differences in generation and attraction due to type of Land Use

    The difference of movement types

    the types of movement = f (parameters soc-ec)

    Land Use Jenis Kendaraan

    Supermarket Passenger cars, Motorcycle

    Fast-food Restaurant Passenger cars, Motorcycle

    Office Passenger cars, Motorcycle

    Tourism Area Passenger cars, Motorcycle, Bus

    Industrial Area Truck

  • Example of the differences in generation and attraction due to type of Land Use

    The difference of times in movement

    Land Use Times of movement

    Supermarket Supermarket operational time (ex : 09.00 21.00)

    Fast-food Restaurant

    Fast-food operational time (ex : 09.00 21.00)

    Office Office operational time (ex : 08.00 16.00)

    Tourism Area Tourism area operational time (ex : 09.00 21.00)

    School School operational time (ex : 07.00 13.00)

  • Intensity (density) of different Land Use affected on the number of generation/attraction. The higher level of land use, the higher of movement that occurred.

    Example:

    Type of Housing SettlementDensity

    (family/ha)

    Movement per day

    Trip Generation per ha

    Settlement in ruralareas

    15 10 150

    Settlement in suburban areas

    45 7 315

    Unit house in urban areas

    80 5 400

    High level flat in CBD

    100 5 500

  • i j

    Trip Distribution

    Stages of modeling that predicted the number of movement that comes from land use (origin zone i) that led to another land use (destination zone j).

  • i(200)

    j (150)

    Example of Trip Distribution

    75

  • Trip Distribution influenced by:

    Space separation : getting closer distance/ shorter travel

    time, the distribution of movement that occurred will be

    greater .

    Land Use Intensity : the greater land use intensity, the

    distribution of movement will be greater.

    Distance

    Far Ignored Low Medium

    Near Low Medium High

    Land Use Intensity Small - Small Small - Big Big - Big

  • Mode Choice/Modal Split

    Stages of modeling that predicted of mode choice can be used to travelling from origin zone I to destination zone j

    Mode choice is very diverse, ranging from the selection between public transport or private cars, until more detailed, for example the private cars to be able to choose between motorcycle or cars

  • i(200)

    j (150)

    45

    30

    Example of Mode Choice

    Private cars

    Public transport

  • Trip Assignment/Route Choice

    Modeling levels that predicted the route choosing can be used to travelling from origin zone i to destination zone j

    Levels of route choosing generally only to private cars, when several route are options, and the object free to choose the route

    Public transport is a captive, because they have to followed fixed route

  • i(200)

    j (150)

    25

    Example of Route Choice

    Route I

    Route II

    20

  • Dynamic Traffic Flow

    The final result of the previous steps is invisibility traffic flow on the network transportation , such as on road A there is a movement as follow:

    MC 100 veh/hr

    Cars 50 veh/hr

    Public transport 20 veh/hr

  • Traffic flow interacts with the network transportation system.

    Traffic flow increasing travel time increase, speed decrease

    Getting closer to the road capacity, travel time will increase asymptotically .

    Comparison Volume and Road Capacity

    Tra

    vel T

    ime

    1

  • Level of Service

    Term by traffic flow

    Comparison volume and road capacity

    Op

    era

    tin

    g S

    peed

    1

    A

    B

    C

    D

    E

    F

  • Level of Service

    Term by facility

    Comparison of volume and road condition

    Co

    mp

    ari

    so

    n o

    f actu

    al

    travel

    tim

    e a

    nd

    fre

    e f

    low

    co

    nd

    itio

    n t

    ravel

    tim

    e

    10 0,5

    1

    2

    3

    Poor service Levels

    Good service Levels

  • Thank You