4th International Conference on Process Analytical Technologies in Organic Process R&D Brussels 2009
description
Transcript of 4th International Conference on Process Analytical Technologies in Organic Process R&D Brussels 2009
PAT and Process Control: Hybrid Real-Time
Technologies for Enhanced Chemical
Development
Dominique Hebrault
Sr. Technology & Application
Consultant
Brussels, March 17-18, 2009
1
Presentation Outline
Introduction
- PAT
- Process Control
Case Studies
- Real Time In Situ Reaction Monitoring with ReactIR™
- Kinetics, Scale-up, and Process Safety with RC1e, and ReactIR™
- Crystallization with FBRM®, PVM® and ReactIR™
- Experiment Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis with Enhanced
Software Tools
2
Introduction
Organic Synthesis Lab at
the turn of the century…
…which century?
3
Introduction
FDA’s View of Process Analytical Technologies
Process Analytical Technology (PAT)
- A system for designing, analyzing, and controlling manufacturing
- Through timely measurements of critical quality and performance
attributes of raw and in-process materials and processes
- With the goal of ensuring final product quality
PAT Fundamental Tenets
- Quality cannot be tested into the product; it should be built-in or should
be by design
PAT Goals
- Enhance understanding and control of processes
PAT tools can be categorized as:
- Process analyzers
- Process control tools
- Multivariate tools for design, data acquisition and analysis
- Continuous improvement and knowledge management tools
PAT tools are used:
- Process development
Process monitoring to develop mechanistic understanding
Statistical DOE and model building to enhance process
understanding
Use of risk analysis in establishment of design space
- Manufacturing
4
Introduction
Scale-up
MonARC
Understanding
ReactIR™ iC10
API Development Production APIScale up
Introduction
PVM® in the labFBRM® in the lab FBRM® in the plant
Optimization
ReactIR™ 45
RTCal™ for real-time
reaction calorimetry at lab scale
Production
Poor temperature control
– Side reactions, slow kinetics
– Supersaturation control issues → broad distribution, impurity, polymorph
Manual addition
– High reagent concentration → by-products
– Supersaturation spikes → oiling out
Poor mixing
– Slow reaction
– Concentration gradient→ side-reaction
– Solid breakage, attrition
Introduction
Reduce risk of experimental error
Reproducibility, traceability, data
logging, modeling
7
Presentation Outline
Introduction
- PAT
- Process Control
Case Studies
- Real Time In Situ Reaction Monitoring with ReactIR™
- Kinetics, Scale-up, and Process Safety with RC1e, and ReactIR™
- Crystallization with FBRM®, PVM® and ReactIR™
- Experiment Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis with Enhanced
Software Tools
Development of a Safe and Scalable
Oxidation Process for the Preparation of
6-Hydroxybuspirone
Introduction
Active metabolite of Buspirone,
manufactured and marketed as Buspar,
employed for the treatment of anxiety
disorders and depression
Multi Kg amount needed for clinical dev.
Process lack of ruggedness and
unreliable product quality
Source: Daniel J. Watson,* Eric D. Dowdy, Jeffrey S. DePue, Atul S. Kotnis, Simon Leung, and Brian C. O’Reilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 616-623; Mettler Toledo Real Time Analytics
Users’ Forum 2004, London, UK
Case Study: FTIR, PAT Tool in Pharma Development
Challenges
Monitor deprotonation of 1 for:
-More precise determination of endpoint
to minimize bis-deprotonation
-Allow for variations in the base titer,
water content, and phosphite quality
Case Study: FTIR, PAT Tool in Pharma Development
KHMDS
1677cm-1
1627cm-1 Observations
-Deprotonation complete within 5’
-Enolate anion 3 stable at -25⁰C for 12h
-Addition of P(OEt)3 before addition of
the base → no impact on IR signal
-Kinetics of enolate degradation
Source: Daniel J. Watson,* Eric D. Dowdy, Jeffrey S. DePue, Atul S. Kotnis, Simon Leung, and Brian C. O’Reilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 616-623; Mettler Toledo Real Time Analytics
Users’ Forum 2004, London, UK
Case Study: FTIR, PAT Tool in Pharma Development
KHMDS
Observations
-Deprotonation complete within 5’
-Enolate anion 3 stable at -25⁰C for 12h
-Addition of P(OEt)3 before addition of
the base → no impact on IR signal
-Kinetics of enolate degradation
Source: Daniel J. Watson,* Eric D. Dowdy, Jeffrey S. DePue, Atul S. Kotnis, Simon Leung, and Brian C. O’Reilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 616-623; Mettler Toledo Real Time Analytics
Users’ Forum 2004, London, UK
Challenges
Monitor deprotonation of 1 for:
-More precise determination of endpoint
to minimize bis-deprotonation
-Allow for variations in the base titer,
water content, and phosphite quality
Case Study: FTIR, PAT Tool in Pharma Development
KHMDS Improved process
-Charged the base to 1 until complete
consumption → Stable signal (1677cm-1)
-1 / THF charged back to the vessel
until the signal increased → 1-3%
excess of the starting material
(quantified FTIR)
-Result: Impurity 8 is minimized
Source: Daniel J. Watson,* Eric D. Dowdy, Jeffrey S. DePue, Atul S. Kotnis, Simon Leung, and Brian C. O’Reilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 616-623; Mettler Toledo Real Time Analytics
Users’ Forum 2004, London, UK
Case Study: FTIR, PAT Tool in Pharma Development
Conclusion
-ReactIR™ allowed titration of the
correct amount of base, prevented
accidental overcharge due to
ambiguous concentration
-Implementation to the pilot plant (13Kg)
-69% yield and >99 area %, need for
recrystallization eliminated
-Robust, superior process &
crystallization thanks to the successful
use of PAT
Buspirone
Buspirone enolate
Source: Daniel J. Watson,* Eric D. Dowdy, Jeffrey S. DePue, Atul S. Kotnis, Simon Leung, and Brian C. O’Reilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 616-623; Mettler Toledo Real Time Analytics
Users’ Forum 2004, London, UK
Development and Scale-up of Three
Consecutive Continuous Reactions for
Production of 6-Hydroxybuspirone
Introduction
Control base / buspirone stoichiometry is
critical to product quality
Optimization based on offline analysis is
time consuming and wasteful
Actual feed rate adjusted based on the
feedback from inline FTIR: Flow cell and
ReactIR™ DiComp probe
Case Study: FTIR as PAT Tool for Continuous Process
Source: Thomas L. LaPorte,* Mourad Hamedi, Jeffrey S. DePue, Lifen Shen, Daniel Watson, and Daniel Hsieh, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2008, 12, 956-966; Mettler Toledo Real Time
Analytics Users’ Forum 2005 - New York
Case Study: FTIR as PAT tool for Continuous Process
Implemented startup strategy
-Start with slight undercharge of base
(feed rate) to reduce diol 8
-Flow rate increased at 1% increments
until no decrease of Buspirone 1 signal
is observed
-Base feed rate was reduced 1-3%
-Works well because enolization fast,
equilibrium reached within minutes
KHMDS
Source: Thomas L. LaPorte,* Mourad Hamedi, Jeffrey S. DePue, Lifen Shen, Daniel Watson, and Daniel Hsieh, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2008, 12, 956-966; Mettler Toledo Real Time
Analytics Users’ Forum 2005 - New York
Case Study: FTIR as PAT Tool for Continuous Process
Outcome
-Ensure product quality via proper ratio
and base feed rate
-Minimize waste of starting material
-Faster reach of steady state via real-
time detection of phase transitions
-FTIR also used for enolization
monitoring during steady state
Scale-up
-Lab reactor: Over 40 hours at steady
state
-Pilot-plant reactor: Successful
implementation (3-batch, 47kg/batch)
Source: Thomas L. LaPorte,* Mourad Hamedi, Jeffrey S. DePue, Lifen Shen, Daniel Watson, and Daniel Hsieh, Bristol-Myers Squibb
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, NJ, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2008, 12, 956-966; Mettler Toledo Real Time
Analytics Users’ Forum 2005 - New York
16
Presentation Outline
Introduction
- PAT
- Process Control
Case Studies
- Real Time In Situ Reaction Monitoring with ReactIR™
- Kinetics, Scale-up, and Process Safety with RC1e, and ReactIR™
- Crystallization with FBRM®, PVM® and ReactIR™
- Experiment Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis with Enhanced
Software Tools
An Integrated Approach Combining
Reaction Engineering and Design of
Experiments for Optimizing Reactions
Introduction
Early phase RC1e experiments to obtain
a basic understanding of:
-Enthalpy
-Kinetics
-Mass Balance
-Type of phases
Case Study: Calo for Reaction Kinetics Screening
Source: D.M. Roberge, Department of Process Research, Lonza, Switzerland, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 1049-1053;
Mettler Toledo 15th International Process Development Conference 2008, Annapolis, USA; Chem. Eng. Tech., 2005, 28, No. 3, 318-323
Type A: Very fast, t1/2< 1 s, controlled by
mixing
Type B: Rapid, 1 s < t1/2< 10 min, mostly
kinetically controlled
Type C: Slow, t1/2 > 10 min, safety issue
in a batch mode
50% of reactions in the
fine/pharmaceutical industry could
benefit from a continuous process
(microreactors)
RC1e allows precise measurement of
reaction enthalpy
Instantaneous reaction heat is related to
reaction rate
Results: Very fast reaction
-No heat accumulation
-Dosing controlled
Case Study: Calo for Reaction Kinetics Screening
Source: D.M. Roberge, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 1049-1053; Mettler Toledo 15th International Process Development
Conference 2008, Annapolis, USA; Chem. Eng. Tech., 2005, 28, No. 3, 318-323
C=C double bond oxidized / cleaved by
aqueous NaOCl catalyzed by Ru
Type A: Very fast, t1/2< 1 s
controlled by mixing
Results: Rapid reaction
-Heat signal function of dosing rate
-Reagent accumulates and reacts
after the end of the dosage
-Lower temperatures favor high
accumulation
-Higher temperatures favor formation
of side products
Case Study: Calo for Reaction Kinetics Screening
Source: D.M. Roberge, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 1049-1053; Mettler Toledo 15th International Process Development
Conference 2008, Annapolis, USA; Chem. Eng. Tech., 2005, 28, No. 3, 318-323
Quench of ozonolysis into methanol /
dimethyl sulphide
Type B: Rapid, 1 s < t1/2< 10 min, mostly
kinetically controlled
Results: Slow reaction
-Accumulation of energy > 70%
-Most of the heat potential evolves
after the end of addition
-Typically initiated by temperature
increase or catalyst addition
-Autocatalytic reaction and / or
induction period
Case Study: Calo for Reaction Kinetics Screening
Source: D.M. Roberge, Organic Process Research and Development, 2004, 8, 1049-1053; Mettler Toledo 15th International Process Development
Conference 2008, Annapolis, USA; Chem. Eng. Tech., 2005, 28, No. 3, 318-323
Knoevenagel-type reaction catalyzed by NaOH:
intramolecular aromatic ring condensation
Type C: Slow, t1/2 > 10 min, safety
issue in a batch mode
Conclusion
Real time RC1e calorimetry also for early
on kinetics and safety assessment
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Industrial Scale-Up
Thorough Examination of a Wittig-Horner
Reaction Using Reaction Calorimetry
(RC-1), LabMax®, and ReactIR™
Introduction
Process not ready for industrial
development: Lack of robustness due to
poor understanding of water effect, base
form, kinetics, and thermo-dynamics
-RC1™ used for kinetic and heat
information
-ReactIR™ and LabMax® used for
quantitative kinetic simulation under
well controlled conditions
Source: Michael Grabarnick and Sharona Zamir*, Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., Israel, Organic Process Research and Development, 2003, 7,
237-243, Mettler Toledo 2001 RXE User Forum
Side-reaction: Benzyl phosphonate hydrolysis
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Industrial Scale-Up
Results
Heat flow from RC1™ used as a real-time
monitoring technique
Initial RC1™ and DOE study results
showed reaction is fast and yield
sensitive to base addition
Source: Michael Grabarnick and Sharona Zamir*, Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., Israel, Organic Process Research and Development, 2003, 7,
237-243, Mettler Toledo 2001 RXE User Forum
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Industrial Scale-Up
-Eahydrolysis > Eastilbene_formation →
temperature↓
-Stilbene formation more sensitive to
H2O than hydrolysis → [H2O] ↓. Impact
on reaction rate constant
-Stilbene formation 2nd order versus
[BA] → [BA] ↑
Validation Run
-Stilbene formation 1st order versus
[KOH]
-Validation experiment under improved
conditions in RC1™
Source: Michael Grabarnick and Sharona Zamir*, Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., Israel, Organic Process Research and Development, 2003, 7,
237-243, Mettler Toledo 2001 RXE User Forum
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Industrial Scale-Up
Process simulation
-BA/stilbene concentration
-Plant reactor temperature (Cp, heat
data from RC1)
Validation of the simulation process with
ReactIR™ and LabMax®
-Real-time concentration data, under
well controlled scaled-down conditions
-Comparison to simulated profiles: good
fit, confirmed 94% yield
-Model tested: 8 m3 production reactor
-Reactants dissolution at 50⁰C
-Tj: -10⁰C
-Once 30 < Tr < 40⁰C, aq. KOH added
Source: Michael Grabarnick and Sharona Zamir*, Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., Israel, Organic Process Research and Development, 2003, 7,
237-243, Mettler Toledo 2001 RXE User Forum
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Industrial Scale-Up
Conclusion
Use of real-time analytics (FTIR, heat)
and modeling to study the mechanism of
a Wittig-Horner reaction via a thorough
kinetic and thermodynamic research
Improved large scale conditions were
obtained
Preparation of mathematical model to
plan industrial equipment: Need for a
more effective heat exchanger for yield
improvement
Source: Michael Grabarnick and Sharona Zamir*, Makhteshim Chemical Works Ltd., Israel, Organic Process Research and Development, 2003, 7,
237-243, Mettler Toledo 2001 RXE User Forum
26
Presentation Outline
Introduction
- PAT
- Process Control
Case Studies
- Real Time In Situ Reaction Monitoring with ReactIR™
- Kinetics, Scale-up, and Process Safety with RC1e, and ReactIR™
- Crystallization with FBRM®, PVM® and ReactIR™
- Experiment Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis with Enhanced
Software Tools
27
PVM® Technology
Particle Video Microscope
Microscope quality images, in-process and in
real-time
Characterize particle systems from 2μm to 1mm
FBRM® Technology
Focused Beam Reflectance Measurement
Track real-time changes in particles and droplets as they naturally exist in the process
Characterize particle systems from 0.5μm to 3mm
FBRM® PVM®
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Crystallization
Process Design and Scale-Up
Elements for Solvent Mediated
Polymorphic Controlled Tecastemizole
Crystallization
Introduction
Tecastemizole: Active metabolite of
histamine H1-receptor antagonist
Astemizole, 2 polymorphic forms A
(stable) and B
800L scale process history shows high
risk of not obtaining desirable polymorph:
Seed controlled to solvent mediated
interconversion
Raman spectroscopy and DSC
unsuitable for interconversion monitoring
Source: Kostas Saranteas,* Roger Bakale, Yaping Hong, Hoa Luong, Reza Foroughi, and Stephen Wald Chemistry and Pharma Sciences,
Sepracor Inc., MA, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2005, 9, 911-922, Mettler Toledo 2001 Lasentec® Users' Forum
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Crystallization
Results
Interconversion rate influenced by
temperature, mixing, B agglomerate size,
initial seed composition
Source: Kostas Saranteas,* Roger Bakale, Yaping Hong, Hoa Luong, Reza Foroughi, and Stephen Wald Chemistry and Pharma Sciences,
Sepracor Inc., MA, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2005, 9, 911-922, Mettler Toledo 2001 Lasentec® Users' Forum
Water added
IR Peak Area, 1513 cm-1
Tr
Particle # / secSeeding
Challenges
Methodical study under well
controlled conditions
-Need for computer control of
batch temperature, agitation
rate, and dose control of the
antisolvent addition (LabMax® )
-Real time supersaturation
determination (ReactIR™)
-In situ particle count and size
measurements (FBRM®)
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Crystallization
-Significant effect on interconversion
rate of hold and cooling temperature
profile following addition of water
-Nonlinear cooling profile takes advantage of the temperature rate
effect on form interconversion (4 h above 70⁰C)
-Interconversion rate-limiting step is
growth of form A
Source: Kostas Saranteas,* Roger Bakale, Yaping Hong, Hoa Luong, Reza Foroughi, and Stephen Wald Chemistry and Pharma Sciences,
Sepracor Inc., MA, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2005, 9, 911-922, Mettler Toledo 2001 Lasentec® Users' Forum
Case Study: Integrated PAT for Crystallization
Summary and conclusion
Scale-down version of the crystallization
step performed at lab scale under well
controlled conditions with LabMax®,
FBRM®, and ReactIR™
After better crystallization understanding,
and optimization, scale-up successfully
validated at both pilot (1200L) and full-
scale manufacturing (6000L)
New profile
Old profile
Tr
Time
Source: Kostas Saranteas,* Roger Bakale, Yaping Hong, Hoa Luong, Reza Foroughi, and Stephen Wald Chemistry and Pharma Sciences,
Sepracor Inc., MA, USA, Organic Process Research and Development, 2005, 9, 911-922, Mettler Toledo 2001 Lasentec® Users' Forum
32
Presentation Outline
Introduction
- PAT
- Process Control
Case Studies
- Real Time In Situ Reaction Monitoring with ReactIR™
- Kinetics, Scale-up, and Process Safety with RC1e, and ReactIR™
- Crystallization with FBRM®, PVM® and ReactIR™
- Experiment Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis with Enhanced
Software Tools
Software for Design, Data Acquisition and Analysis
Automated Lab Reactor
– Initiate and control PAT experiments
– Live drag/drop data exchange with reactor
Process Analyzers
– Control lab reactor based on trend data
– Live drag/drop data exchange with reactor
Multivariate analysis
– ConcIRT™ live algorithm:
Converts in situ FTIR/Raman
data into concentration profiles
– iC Quant™ determines
component concentrations in
an unknown mixture
Data to information software tools
– iC SafetyTM converts reaction
calorimetry data into process
safety information
Summary
- Did the reaction work?
- Understand selectivity and reactivity
- Identify intermediates or by-products
- How long did it take?
- Endpoint, initiation-point, stall-point
- Can this process be scaled-up?
- Identify key control parameters
- Understand reaction kinetics- Will it be safe?
- Measure reaction heat/enthalpy
- Determine heat capacity, heat
transfer coefficient
- Worst case scenario estimation
- Thermal accumulation and
conversion
Process chemistry challenges: ReactIR™, calorimetry and automated reactors
Summary
- Do the particles have the right
dimensions, distribution,
morphology?
- Do product scale-up consistently
meet specifications? Does it
require rework?
- How is filtration rate? How about
drying time? Is it consistent?
- Measure solubility and screen MSZ
- Understand, monitor, and control
supersaturation
- Track nucleation and growth kinetics of
crystallization
- Identify and control critical parameters
- Scale-down experiments in the lab
Crystallization development: ReactIR™, FBRM®, PVM®, automated reactors