3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

download 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

of 53

Transcript of 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    1/53

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    2/53

    1

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Note: Stock prices as on December 30, 2011

    Table of Contents

    StrategyStrategyStrategyStrategyStrategy 2-62-62-62-62-6

    3QFY2012 Sectoral Outlook3QFY2012 Sectoral Outlook3QFY2012 Sectoral Outlook3QFY2012 Sectoral Outlook3QFY2012 Sectoral Outlook

    Automobile 8

    Banking 11

    Capital Goods 15

    Cement 18

    FMCG 20

    Infrastructure 22

    Metals 26

    Oil & Gas 29

    Pharmaceutical 32

    Power 35

    Real Estate 37

    Software 39

    Telecom 42

    Stock WStock WStock WStock WStock Watchatchatchatchatch 4545454545

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    3/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 2

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Strategy

    We expect Sensex companies to maintain healthy top-line growth

    momentum, with projected growth of 18.5% yoy in sales.

    However, growth is likely to be slower than the ~23% growth

    witnessed in 2QFY2012. On the bottom-line front, margin woes

    are likely to continue, leading to low 7.7% yoy earnings growth

    for Sensex companies. Ex. ONGC, Sensex earnings growth is

    likely to be ~11%, as ONGC's earnings are expected to decline

    37% due to higher subsidy-sharing burden. Across the board,

    margin compression, as witnessed over the past few quarters,

    is likely to continue in 3QFY2012 as well. On a yoy basis,

    operating margin is expected to contract by a rather steep 300bp

    to 22.3%. On a sequential basis, margin compression is expectedto be 40bp. Net profit margin is expected to come in lower at

    12.4%, implying a decline of 176bp yoy (40bp qoq).

    We expect strong numbers to be posted by BFSI and IT stocks

    in 3QFY2012, accounting for ~83% of Sensex' net profit growth.

    Top-line growth is likely to be dominated by auto and oil and

    gas stocks, accounting for combined top-line growth of ~58%.

    Sensex IT companies are expected to report strong 31.3%

    yoy sales growth, partly aided by the recent sharp INR

    depreciation. On the back of sharp depreciation of INR vis--

    vis the USD, profitability of companies such as TCS, Infosys and

    Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (````` cr)cr)cr)cr)cr) Net PNet PNet PNet PNet Profit (rofit (rofit (rofit (rofit (````` cr)cr)cr)cr)cr)

    CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany WWWWWeightage (%)eightage (%)eightage (%)eightage (%)eightage (%) 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg

    Finance 23.4 25,149 21,657 16.1 7,223 6,244 15.7

    IT 18.1 32,307 24,598 31.3 6,620 5,445 21.6

    Oil & Gas 13.5 95,564 80,613 18.5 10,728 12,219 (12.2)

    FMCG 11.9 12,241 10,481 16.8 2,344 1,962 19.5

    Auto 9.2 68,269 56,004 21.9 4,813 4,783 0.6

    Engineering 6.0 23,044 20,436 12.8 2,332 2,244 3.9

    Metals 5.6 49,547 46,470 6.6 2,985 3,640 (18.0)

    Telecom 3.6 18,133 15,756 15.1 1,445 1,304 10.9

    Power 3.2 21,757 17,834 22.0 2,825 2,782 1.6

    Pharma 2.9 3,562 3,102 14.8 720 583 23.5

    Mining 1.6 17,664 12,692 39.2 3,650 2,626 39.0

    Real Estate 0.6 2,719 2,480 9.6 414 466 (11.1)

    Construction 0.5 3,304 2,949 12.0 70 233 (70.2)

    SensexSensexSensexSensexSensex 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0 373,263373,263373,263373,263373,263 315,072315,072315,072315,072315,072 18.518.518.518.518.5 46,16946,16946,16946,16946,169 44,53044,53044,53044,53044,530 3.73.73.73.73.7

    SensexSensexSensexSensexSensex##### 18.918.918.918.918.9 7.77.77.77.77.7

    Exhibit 1: Sensex earnings summary

    Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: #On free-float adjusted basis

    3QFY2012 Sensex earnings - Margin woes likely to lead to sub-10% profit growth

    Wipro is expected to rebound by healthy 25.1%, 23.4% and 12.8%

    yoy, respectively, resulting in combined PAT growth of 21.6% yoy.

    Sensex pharmaceutical companies are expected to buck the

    trend of margin compression, with a strong 574bp yoy OPM

    expansion on the back of 14.8% yoy top-line growth, partly

    aided by the recent depreciation of the INR vs. USD. Bottom-

    line growth is expected to be healthy at 23.5% yoy.

    We expect Sensex BFSI companies to post healthy 16.9%

    yoy bottom-line growth on the back of stable to improving

    margins and healthy performance of private banks. Ex. BFSI,

    growth in Sensex profit is expected to be weak 5.2% yoy. While oil and gas stocks are expected to contribute a sizeable

    ~31% to the top-line growth of the Sensex, operating margins

    are expected to decline rather steeply. Operating margin for

    ONGC is expected to fall sharply by 13.5% yoy and 11.6%

    qoq, resulting in a sharp 37.1% yoy fall in earnings despite a

    relatively lower (17.3%) decline in sales. The sharp compression

    is expected on account of higher subsidy-sharing burden. For

    RIL, we expect strong 31% yoy top-line growth on the back of

    rise in prices of petrochemical products. However, margin

    compression is expected to limit the bottom-line expansion to

    22.2% yoy.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    4/53

    3

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Earnings growth of Angel coverage universe likely to

    moderate to ~4%.

    Earnings growth trajectory for our coverage universe is also

    expected to moderate considerably in 3QFY2012, as higher

    input costs and interest rates continue to hamper margins and

    the overall profitability of corporates. For our coverage universe

    as a whole, we expect top-line growth to remain healthy at

    close to 17% levels. However, the compression in OPM is likely

    to restrict operating profit growth to just ~6% and net profit

    (primarily due to higher interest costs) is likely to rise at an even

    slower pace of 3.5% yoy.

    Standout performers among the sectors under our coverage

    are likely to be IT, FMCG and pharma companies. FMCG and

    pharma companies being the typical defensives have been least

    impacted by the ongoing domestic as well as the global

    slowdown.

    The FMCG sector's earnings growth trajectory remains

    healthy, backed by the ever-growing consumer demand and

    relative price inelasticity of their products. For 3QFY2012, we

    expect our FMCG coverage universe to register healthy ~18%

    top-line growth, backed by modest volume growth and price

    hikes. OPMs are likely to expand on the back of better product

    mix and cut in ad spends, resulting in healthy ~20% growth in

    operating as well as net profit.

    IT companies are expected to reap the benefits of

    depreciating INR vs. the USD. Demand for IT solutions also

    remains better than expected, leading to modest volume growth.

    While tier-I IT companies are expected to register strong earnings

    growth, earnings for mid-tier IT companies are likely to be a

    mixed bag. Overall, we expect our IT coverage universe to

    register earnings growth of 23% on the back of strong ~31%

    top-line growth.

    Pharma companies under our coverage universe are

    expected to register strong ~47% earnings growth (ex. Ranbaxy

    at ~11%) on the back of reasonable top-line growth and lower

    forex losses for Ranbaxy.

    On the flip side, cyclical sectors viz. capital goods,

    construction and real estate are likely to face the brunt of higher

    interest costs at the time of overall demand slowdown. For our

    capital goods universe, we expect moderate 12.7% yoy

    top-line growth. However, on the bottom-line front, we expect

    most companies to post a decline mainly on account of marginpressure and, in some cases, due to higher interest costs. The

    adverse impact of slowdown coupled with higher interest rates

    is likely to be more prominent on infrastructure companies, with

    Strategy

    Though Sensex auto companies are expected to contribute

    a significant 26.8% to Sensex' top-line growth, their contribution

    to earnings growth is expected to be just 2.8%. Healthy revenuegrowth is expected to be led by strong volume growth, price

    increases along with better product mix and favorable currency

    movement (primarily on the JLR front). Operating margins are

    expected to contract by 194bp yoy, led by a yoy increase in

    raw-material prices. Further, higher discounts offered by most

    companies (except two-wheeler makers) to prop-up sales are

    also likely to weigh on margin performance. Overall, we expect

    revenue growth of ~22% for Sensex auto companies and a

    marginal 0.6% yoy increase in net profit.

    We expect Sensex FMCG companies to post decent 16.8%yoy growth in sales, aided by modest volume growth coupled

    with price hikes taken by companies. Margins are expected to

    improve by ~60bp yoy for FMCG companies, on the back of

    better product mix and cut in ad spends. Bottom-line growth for

    Sensex FMCG companies is expected to be healthy at 19.5% yoy.

    From the telecom pack, Bharti Airtel is expected to report

    15.1% yoy top-line growth on the back of modest improvement

    in KPIs and decent growth in subscriber base. While operating

    profit growth is expected to be healthy at 24% yoy, net profit

    growth is expected to be relatively lower at 10.9% yoy partly onaccount of further depreciation of the INR during the quarter.

    Metal companies are expected to witness an 18% yoy decline

    in their net profit, despite 6.6% yoy top-line growth due to a

    220bp and 180bp compression in operating and net profit

    margins, respectively. While sales are expected to increase due

    to higher realizations, relatively higher raw-material costs and

    other environmental clearance issues are likely to hamper

    earnings growth. For Coal India, we expect strong growth of

    39% yoy in net profit on account of the sharp price increase

    taken during February 2011.

    Although the capital goods sector is expected to witness

    reasonable sales growth of 12.8% yoy, PAT margin is estimated

    to fall by 86bp yoy, resulting in muted bottom-line growth of

    3.9% yoy.

    In the construction sector, we expect JP Associates to report

    disappointing performance with a 70.2% yoy decline in the

    bottom line due to abysmal OPM of the cement segment and

    higher interest costs.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    5/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 4

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Exhibit 3: India's underperformance vs global markets in CY2011

    MSCI - India MSCI - EM MSCI - World

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    Jan-1

    1

    Fe

    b-1

    1

    Mar-

    11

    Apr-

    11

    May-1

    1

    Jun-1

    1

    Jul-11

    Aug-1

    1

    Sep-1

    1

    Oc

    t-11

    Nov-1

    1

    Dec-1

    1

    earnings expected to decline by ~16% yoy despite ~10%

    revenue growth. Even for our real estate coverage universe, we

    project earnings to decline by ~9% yoy, despite a ~12% top-line growth.

    For our financials coverage universe, reasonable growth in

    earnings of large private sector banks is likely to be mainly

    Strategy

    offset by weak growth for most public sector banks, especially

    the smaller ones. Overall, we expect large private banks to

    post ~16% yoy growth in net interest income (NII), while PSUbanks are expected to register ~11% yoy growth. On the net

    profit front, the picture becomes even starker with earnings

    growth of large private banks at ~19% vis--vis weak ~3%

    growth expected for public sector banks.

    Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (`````cr)cr)cr)cr)cr) Operating POperating POperating POperating POperating Profit (rofit (rofit (rofit (rofit (`````cr)cr)cr)cr)cr) Net PNet PNet PNet PNet Profit (rofit (rofit (rofit (rofit (`````cr)cr)cr)cr)cr)

    CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg

    Auto & Auto Ancillary 82,262 68,118 20.8 9,699 9,236 5.0 5,570 5,557 0.2

    Capital Goods 21,340 18,940 12.7 3,087 3,104 (0.6) 1,960 2,001 (2.0)

    Cement 11,775 9,917 18.7 2,335 1,938 20.5 1,028 932 10.3

    Construction 24,389 22,247 9.6 3,395 3,302 2.8 1,218 1,453 (16.1)

    Financials 64,659 57,325 12.8 37,437 33,317 12.4 17,971 16,658 7.9

    FMCG 24,559 20,878 17.6 4,907 4,107 19.5 3,534 2,958 19.5

    IT 44,423 33,979 30.7 11,354 8,393 35.3 8,144 6,622 23.0

    Metals 75,893 69,562 9.1 13,199 14,216 (7.2) 7,282 8,327 (12.6)

    Mining 17,664 12,692 39.2 4,328 3,445 25.6 3,650 2,626 39.0

    Oil & Gas 108,068 93,409 15.7 23,051 25,827 (10.8) 13,769 15,197 (9.4)

    Pharmaceuticals 14,740 13,492 9.3 2,888 3,080 (6.2) 2,484 1,686 47.3

    Power 17,701 14,650 20.8 4,335 4,075 6.4 2,407 2,542 (5.3)

    Real Estate 3,421 3,060 11.8 1,585 1,522 4.2 698 768 (9.1)

    Telecom 22,991 19,712 16.6 7,444 5,930 25.5 1,599 1,547 3.4

    Angel UniverseAngel UniverseAngel UniverseAngel UniverseAngel Universe 533,884533,884533,884533,884533,884 457,977457,977457,977457,977457,977 16.616.616.616.616.6 129,043129,043129,043129,043129,043 121,491121,491121,491121,491121,491 6.26.26.26.26.2 71,31471,31471,31471,31471,314 68,87468,87468,87468,87468,874 3.53.53.53.53.5

    Exhibit 2: Angel universe estimates summary

    Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: Only for coverage stocks for which quarterly results are estimated

    Valuations de-rated due to slowdown fears

    Indian markets fell by one-fourth in CY2011 and were one of

    the worst performers across the globe due to fears of globalslowdown and slowing domestic growth trends hampering the

    India growth story. The recent spate of economic data, namely

    GDP growth falling below 7%, industrial production contracting

    for the first time in more than two years and marginal exports

    growth point towards the entrenchment of the current economic

    slowdown.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    6/53

    5

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Source: IMF, Angel Research

    Exhibit 4: Sensex one-year forward P/E

    6.0

    9.0

    12.0

    15.0

    18.0

    21.0

    24.0

    27.0

    Sensex 1 year forwa rd P/E 15 year Avg 5 year Avg

    Apr-

    96

    Jan-9

    7

    Oct-97

    Jul-98

    Apr-

    99

    Jan-0

    0

    Oct-00

    Jul-01

    Apr-

    02

    Jan-0

    3

    Oct-03

    Jul-04

    Apr-

    05

    Jan-0

    6

    Oct-06

    Jul-07

    Apr-

    08

    Jan-0

    9

    Oct-09

    Jul-10

    Apr-11

    Source: IMF, Angel Research

    Exhibit 5: Earnings yield vs. Bond yield

    3.0

    5.0

    7.0

    9.0

    11.0

    13.0

    Earnings Yield 10Yr G-Sec Yield

    Apr-

    99

    Jan-0

    0

    Oct-00

    Jul-01

    Apr-

    02

    Jan-0

    3

    Oct-03

    Jul-04

    Apr-

    05

    Jan-0

    6

    Oct-06

    Jul-07

    Apr-

    08

    Jan-0

    9

    Oct-09

    Jul-10

    Apr-

    11

    Source: Angel Research

    Exhibit 6: FY2012 EPS growth to be sub-10%

    834

    1,014

    1,110

    1,290

    350

    550

    750

    950

    1,150

    1,350

    FY2010 FY2011 FY2012E FY2013E

    (`)

    21.6% g

    rowth

    9.5%grow

    th16.2

    % growth

    The earnings growth trajectory for Indian corporates has

    moderated due to higher raw-material costs and interest rates

    hurting margins over the past few quarters. Consequently,

    valuations of Indian equities have got de-rated; and companies

    are now trading at a substantial discount to their long-term

    trading range. Based on one-year forward earnings, the Sensex

    is trading at 12.5x, which translates into a 26% and 11% discount

    to its five and 10-year trading average. The signaling of peaking

    interest rates by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and cooling,

    albeit moderately, inflation levels provide some silver linings.

    Hence, while FY2012 earnings growth is likely to be modest, cooling

    inflation and interest rates should underpin healthier growth in

    FY2013. We expect Sensex companies to deliver EPS growth of9.5% in FY2012 and improve it further to 16.2% in FY2013,

    translating into a reasonable 12.8% CAGR over FY2011-13E.

    Strategy

    The primary growth drivers of Sensex EPS over FY2011-13E

    are expected to be the BFSI, oil and gas and IT sectors, with the

    BFSI sector expected to contribute more than 30% (31.7%) tothe overall growth in Sensex EPS during the period, while

    contribution from the oil and gas and IT sectors is estimated to

    be at 19.9% and 15.5%, respectively. Strong performance by

    the BFSI sector highlights the sustained earnings outlook for

    HDFC Bank and a low base effect for SBI, which has not posted

    growth in PAT over FY2009-11. IT companies are expected to

    do well, backed by the recent sharp depreciation of the INR vis-

    -vis the USD and higher volumes. On the other hand, sectors

    such as telecom, power and FMCG are expected to

    underperform the others. The combined contribution of these

    three sectors to Sensex EPS growth is expected to be 11.8%over FY2011-13E.

    Source: Angel Research

    Exhibit 7: BFSI, Oil & Gas and IT to dominate growth

    5.4 0.54.3

    31.77.0

    15.57.8

    19.9 2.8 1.40.3 3.4 100.0

    -

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    100.0

    A

    uto

    Con

    str.

    En

    gg.

    Finance

    FMCG IT

    Metals

    Oil

    &G

    as

    Phar

    ma

    Power

    Rea

    lEs

    tate

    Telecom

    To

    tal

    (%)

    We remain confident on the long-term prospects of the Indian

    growth story due to benefits of demographic dividend, a

    primarily internal consumption-driven economy, its relative better

    positioning globally, reasonable earnings growth trajectory and

    reasonable valuations vis--vis India's structurally positive

    outlook. The peaking of inflation and interest rate cycle bode

    well for Indian Inc., which has been battered with twin pressures

    of higher raw-material costs and decadal high interest rates.As inflation peaks out, we expect the interest rate cycle to peak

    out with expected policy rate cuts from CY2012 to stimulate the

    slowing domestic growth momentum. The recent sharp

    depreciation of the INR vis--vis the USD is likely to improve

    the competitiveness of Indian exports in overseas markets.

    Accordingly, we continue to like export-oriented IT and pharma

    stocks. We also maintain our positive stance on large private

    sector banks on the back of attractive valuations and structural

    positives. We maintain our 12-18 months Sensex target of

    18,000, assigning a conservative multiple of 14x FY2013E

    earnings. Our target implies an upside of ~17% from current

    levels, which is likely to be back-ended.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    7/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 6

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Strategy

    Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (Net Sales (`````cr)cr)cr)cr)cr) Net PNet PNet PNet PNet Profit (rofit (rofit (rofit (rofit (`````cr)cr)cr)cr)cr) WWWWWeightageeightageeightageeightageeightage % Contribution% Contribution% Contribution% Contribution% Contribution

    CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E3QFY2012E 3QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY20113QFY2011 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg (%)(%)(%)(%)(%) to Sensex growthto Sensex growthto Sensex growthto Sensex growthto Sensex growth#####

    Bajaj Auto 4,720 4,028 17.2 791 667 18.6 1.7 3.9

    Bharti Airtel 18,133 15,756 15.1 1,445 1,304 10.9 3.6 3.1

    BHEL 10,873 9,023 20.5 1,465 1,403 4.4 1.6 1.4

    Cipla 1,662 1,501 10.7 295 233 26.7 1.3 2.5

    Coal India 17,664 12,692 39.2 3,650 2,626 39.0 1.6 6.4

    DLF 2,719 2,480 9.6 414 466 (11.1) 0.6 (0.8)

    HDFC 1,553 1,328 17.0 1,047 891 17.5 7.2 9.3

    HDFC Bank 4,468 3,905 14.4 1,419 1,088 30.5 6.3 16.6

    Hero Honda 6,012 5,118 17.5 629 509 23.6 1.4 3.8

    Hindalco 5,909 5,918 (0.1) 480 460 4.3 1.2 0.9

    HUL 5,815 5,027 15.7 663 573 15.7 3.4 2.8

    ICICI Bank 4,544 4,061 11.9 1,644 1,437 14.4 6.3 13.0

    Infosys 9,222 7,106 29.8 2,197 1,780 23.4 10.8 22.2

    ITC 6,427 5,453 17.8 1,681 1,389 21.0 8.5 12.8

    Jindal Steel & Power 3,848 3,168 21.5 1,005 951 5.7 1.5 1.5

    JP Associates 3,304 2,949 12.0 70 233 (70.2) 0.5 (5.6)

    L&T 12,171 11,413 6.6 867 841 3.1 4.4 1.5

    M&M 7,981 6,074 31.4 654 617 6.0 2.4 1.7

    Maruti Suzuki 7,335 9,277 (20.9) 179 565 (68.3) 1.1 (12.1)

    NTPC 16,187 13,421 20.6 2,223 2,371 (6.3) 2.1 (1.9)

    ONGC 17,200 20,804 (17.3) 4,454 7,083 (37.1) 3.5 (32.9)

    RIL 78,364 59,809 31.0 6,274 5,136 22.2 10.0 39.2

    SBI 14,584 12,364 18.0 3,113 2,828 10.1 3.7 8.0

    Sterlite 8,798 8,294 6.1 771 1,105 (30.2) 1.1 (9.4)

    Sun Pharma 1,900 1,601 18.7 425 350 21.4 1.6 1.9

    Tata Motors 42,221 31,506 34.0 2,560 2,425 5.6 2.5 5.5

    Tata Power 5,570 4,413 26.2 603 410 46.8 1.2 8.4

    Tata Steel 30,992 29,089 6.5 729 1,123 (35.1) 1.8 (17.3)

    TCS 13,256 9,663 37.2 2,936 2,346 25.1 5.4 11.1

    Wipro 9,829 7,829 25.5 1,487 1,319 12.8 1.9 2.6

    TTTTTotalotalotalotalotal 373,263373,263373,263373,263373,263 315,072315,072315,072315,072315,072 18.518.518.518.518.5 46,16946,16946,16946,16946,169 44,53044,53044,53044,53044,530 3.73.73.73.73.7 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0

    SensexSensexSensexSensexSensex##### 18.918.918.918.918.9 7.77.77.77.77.7

    Exhibit 8: Earnings estimates for Sensex companies

    Source: Angel Research; Note: #based on free-float weightages

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    8/53

    7

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    3QFY2012 Sectoral Outlook

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    9/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 8

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Automobile

    Strong demand for LCVs driving CV sales

    The CV segment continued its strong growth rate, reporting

    20.5% yoy growth YTD in FY2012, led by robust growth in the

    LCV segment, which grew by 30.9% yoy. LCV demand continues

    to be driven by growth in the agriculture sector; increasing

    preference for low payload vehicles; structural factors such as

    proliferation of the hub and spoke model; and new launches.

    The M&HCV segment, however, witnessed 8.4% yoy growth

    mainly due to slowdown in industrial activity and higher

    financing rates. Going ahead, we expect the LCV segment to

    sustain its strong performance and grow at a CAGR of 16-18%

    over the next two years.

    Healthy volume growth despite macro concerns

    The Indian automotive industry sustained its healthy volume

    momentum, registering 15.4% yoy growth YTD in FY2012despite slowdown in economic growth, high interest rate

    environment and rising fuel prices. Volume growth continues to

    be driven by two-wheelers (up 17.9%), light commercial vehicles

    (LCV, up by an impressive 30.9%) and three-wheelers (up

    15.5%); however, interest-rate sensitive segments such as

    medium and heavy commercial vehicles (M&HCV, up 8.4%)

    and passenger vehicles (PV, up marginally by 2.7%) continued

    to report moderate growth. During 3QFY2012, Bajaj Auto

    (BJAUT), Hero MotoCorp (HMCL), Mahindra and Mahindra

    (MM) and Tata Motors (TTMT) surprised positively on the volume

    front, while Maruti Suzuki (MSIL), Ashok Leyland (AL) and TVS

    Motor (TVSL) posted lower-than-expected volumes. Going

    ahead, we expect two-wheeler and LCV sales to continue to

    grow at a healthy rate; however, macroeconomic concerns are

    likely to plague PV and M&HCV performance. In the long run

    though, volume outlook is expected to be positive, aided by

    rising income levels, easy availability of finance, new product

    launches and improved outlook for exports.

    For 3QFY2012, we expect our auto universe to witness strong

    revenue growth of ~21% yoy, led by healthy volume growth,

    price increases along with better product mix and favorable

    currency movement (primarily on the JLR front). We expect

    EBITDA margins to contract by ~140bp yoy (flat qoq) to 12%,

    led by a yoy increase in raw-material prices. Further, higher

    discounts offered by most of the companies (except two-wheeler

    makers) to prop-up sales are also likely to weigh on margin

    performance. While commodity prices still remain at higher

    levels on a yoy basis, they have stabilized sequentially, indicating

    improvement in margins going ahead. Led by operating margin

    pressures, adjusted net profit (excluding forex loss) is likely to

    register modest ~3% yoy growth.

    Interest rates and fuel prices continued their upward trend

    As most of the consumers in the auto industry rely on financing

    (PV: ~75% and CV: ~85%), a gradual increase in interest rates

    by the RBI over the past 18 months has resulted in higher EMI

    outflow for consumers, leading to postponement of new vehicle

    purchases. Further, increased fuel prices (petrol prices up by

    `7.6 and diesel prices up by`3.2 YTD in FY2012) have

    negatively affected sales.

    Auto Index outperforms the Sensex

    The BSE Auto Index performed better than the Sensex (1.9%outperformance) during the quarter; however, on an absolute

    basis, it registered a decline of 4.2%. Concerns regarding

    volume growth in the sector due to increasing macro-economic

    issues weighed on investor sentiments and, therefore, affected

    the stock price performance. Among the front runners, TTMT

    and BJAUT were the major gainers, led by better-than-expected

    volume performance; MM and MSIL, however, underperformed

    sharply during the quarter. While MSIL's performance suffered

    on account of labor issues (resulting in production losses) and

    impact of adverse currency movement on margins, correction

    in MM was triggered by weak 2QFY2012 results.

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Exhibit 1: Interest rates vs. auto sales

    (40.0)

    (20.0)

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    10.0

    11.0

    12.0

    13.0

    14.0

    15.0

    S BI PLR y oy change i n CV+ PV vol ume ( RHS)

    Apr-

    07

    Oct-07

    Apr-

    08

    Oct-08

    May-0

    9

    Nov-0

    9

    May-1

    0

    Nov-1

    0

    May-1

    1

    Nov-1

    1

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Exhibit 2: Stock price performance

    6.5

    (12.8)

    3.8

    (5.5)

    (18.6)

    (1.9)

    (14.9)

    (14.9)

    14.3

    10.7

    (8.7)

    8.0

    (1.4)

    (14.4)

    2.3

    (10.7)

    (10.7)

    18.5

    ( 25 .0 ) (2 0. 0) (1 5. 0) (1 0. 0) ( 5. 0) 0 .0 5 .0 1 0. 0 1 5. 0 2 0. 0 2 5.0

    Apollo Tyres

    Ashok Leyland

    Bajaj Auto

    Bharat Forge

    Exide Industries

    Hero MotoCorp

    M&M

    Maruti Suzuki

    Tata Motors

    Relative to Auto index (%) Absolute (%)

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    10/53

    9

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Automobile

    Festive season fails to boost PV sales

    The PV industry continues to face the brunt of fuel price hikes

    and increased interest rates as most buyers are waiting on the

    sidelines and are postponing their purchases. As a result, market

    conditions remained challenging, resulting in modest volume

    growth of 2.7% yoy YTD in FY2012. Noticeably, volumes in the

    domestic PC segment (~75% of PV sales) registered a decline

    of 3.5% yoy during the period. The arbitrage between petrol

    and diesel prices has increased significantly in recent times

    (currently at ~`24 against five-year historical average of ~`14),

    leading to a shift in consumer demand in favor of diesel cars.

    Thus, demand for petrol cars has been severely affected and is

    expected to have declined by ~11% in 1HFY2012 as against a

    strong 24% increase for diesel cars. We expect the demand

    environment to remain challenging in 2HFY2012 as well;however, the likely easing of interest rates from 1QFY2013 will

    lead to revival in demand. We remain positive on the long-term

    prospects of the PV sector and estimate the segment to register a

    CAGR of 10-12% over the next two years.

    During 3QFY2012, MSIL's volume declined by 27.6% yoy (5%

    qoq), primarily led by the labor strike at its plants (Gurgaon

    and Manesar) in October 2011, resulting in a production loss

    of over 40,000 units. Consequently, MSIL's market share

    dropped significantly by ~775bp yoy to 41.4% in the PC market

    YTD in FY2012. We expect MSIL to report a ~68% yoy declinein its net profit during the quarter, led by lower production and

    adverse currency movement. However, we expect MSIL to regain

    During 3QFY2012, TTMT is likely to report robust ~34% yoy

    growth in net sales backed by strong volume growth (on the

    JLR as well as standalone level) and favorable currency

    movement, primarily on the JLR front. Adjusted net profit is,

    however, likely to report modest ~6% yoy growth mainly on

    account of margin pressures. AL is expected to post ~150%

    yoy growth in its adjusted net profit, largely due to low base

    and ~23% yoy growth in revenue.

    Two-wheeler sales volume remains strong

    The two-wheeler segment sustained its strong performance,

    defying the economic slowdown, and registered 18% yoy growth

    YTD in FY2012. Two-wheeler sales continued to be benefitted

    by inadequate public transport system, rising income levels

    (particularly in rural areas) and strong replacement demand in

    urban markets. Domestic volumes grew by 16.1% yoy, while

    exports registered robust 31% yoy growth YTD in FY2012. The

    scooter and motorcycle segments maintained their strong growth

    traction, recording 25.1% and 17% yoy growth, respectively.We expect two-wheeler majors to witness top-line growth of

    17-18% yoy during 3QFY2012, largely backed by volume

    growth. Led by strong sales growth, HMCL continued to regain

    its market share, which now stands at 40.3% (39.2%) compared

    to 26.6% (26.1%) and 14.3% (15%) for BJAUT and TVSL,

    respectively. Going ahead, we expect two-wheeler sales to

    maintain their volume momentum and register a 12-14% CAGR

    in volumes over the next couple of years.

    some lost ground by the end of 4QFY2012, led by new product

    launches (Ertiga and compact Dzire) and normalization in

    production levels at its Manesar plant.

    Source: Company; Angel Research

    Exhibit 3: TTMT and AL Quarterly volumes

    SegmentSegmentSegmentSegmentSegment 3QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY12 3QFY113QFY113QFY113QFY113QFY11 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY1212121212 9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY1111111111 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg

    TTMTTTMTTTMTTTMTTTMT 227,111227,111227,111227,111227,111 186,873186,873186,873186,873186,873 21.521.521.521.521.5 626,583626,583626,583626,583626,583 566,987566,987566,987566,987566,987 10.510.510.510.510.5

    M&HCV 53,982 50,883 6.1 157,431 149,616 5.2

    LCV 89,636 74,677 20.0 256,629 201,844 27.1

    TTTTTotal CVotal CVotal CVotal CVotal CV 143,618143,618143,618143,618143,618 125,560125,560125,560125,560125,560 14.414.414.414.414.4 414,060414,060414,060414,060414,060 351,460351,460351,460351,460351,460 17.817.817.817.817.8

    Utility vehicles 13,745 9,472 45.1 36,375 29,013 25.4

    PC 69,748 51,841 34.5 176,148 186,514 (5.6)

    TTTTTotal PVotal PVotal PVotal PVotal PV 83,49383,49383,49383,49383,493 61,31361,31361,31361,31361,313 36.236.236.236.236.2 212,523212,523212,523212,523212,523 215,527215,527215,527215,527215,527 (1.4)(1.4)(1.4)(1.4)(1.4)

    Exports (incl. above) 14,135 15,962 (11.4) 45,025 42,658 5.5

    ALALALALAL 23,21523,21523,21523,21523,215 18,43718,43718,43718,43718,437 25.925.925.925.925.9 66,12066,12066,12066,12066,120 64,42664,42664,42664,42664,426 2.62.62.62.62.6

    Exhibit 5: BJAUT, HMCL and TVSL Quarterly volumes

    SegmentSegmentSegmentSegmentSegment 3QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY12 3QFY113QFY113QFY113QFY113QFY11 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY1212121212 9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY1111111111 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg

    BJABJABJABJABJAUTUTUTUTUT 1,075,4411,075,4411,075,4411,075,4411,075,441 946,850946,850946,850946,850946,850 13.613.613.613.613.6 3,332,3933,332,3933,332,3933,332,3933,332,393 2,875,7342,875,7342,875,7342,875,7342,875,734 15.915.915.915.915.9

    Motorcycles 946,749 838,487 12.9 2,937,157 2,550,350 15.2

    Three-wheelers 128,692 108,363 18.8 395,236 325,357 21.5

    Exports (incl. above) 380,912 296,644 28.4 1,232,410 927,875 32.8

    HMCLHMCLHMCLHMCLHMCL 1,589,2861,589,2861,589,2861,589,2861,589,286 1,428,0301,428,0301,428,0301,428,0301,428,030 11.311.311.311.311.3 4,663,1784,663,1784,663,1784,663,1784,663,178 3,948,0123,948,0123,948,0123,948,0123,948,012 18.118.118.118.118.1

    TVSLTVSLTVSLTVSLTVSL 529,681529,681529,681529,681529,681 524,171524,171524,171524,171524,171 1.11.11.11.11.1 1,672,0781,672,0781,672,0781,672,0781,672,078 1,512,9651,512,9651,512,9651,512,9651,512,965 10.510.510.510.510.5

    Motorcycles 194,922 208,632 (6.6) 651,047 617,996 5.3

    Scooters 136,550 122,696 11.3 412,205 342,538 20.3

    Mopeds 189,268 182,735 3.6 576,569 524,568 9.9

    Three-wheelers 8,941 10,108 (11.5) 32,257 27,863 15.8

    Exports (incl. above) 68,881 51,394 34.0 230,140 164,337 40.0

    Source:Company, Angel Research

    Exhibit 4: MSIL and MM Quarterly volumes

    SegmentSegmentSegmentSegmentSegment 3QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY12 3QFY113QFY113QFY113QFY113QFY11 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY1212121212 9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY9MFY1111111111 % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg

    MSILMSILMSILMSILMSIL 239,528239,528239,528239,528239,528 330,687330,687330,687330,687330,687 (27.6)(27.6)(27.6)(27.6)(27.6) 773,361773,361773,361773,361773,361 927,665927,665927,665927,665927,665 (16.6)(16.6)(16.6)(16.6)(16.6)

    Domestic 211,803 299,527 (29.3) 684,892 820,350 (16.5)

    Exports 27,725 31,160 (11.0) 88,469 107,315 (17.6)

    MMMMMMMMMM 190,743190,743190,743190,743190,743 153,833153,833153,833153,833153,833 24.024.024.024.024.0 531,714531,714531,714531,714531,714 423,710423,710423,710423,710423,710 25.525.525.525.525.5

    Automotive - domestic 117,402 90,205 30.2 327,897 255,965 28.1

    Automotive - exports 7,587 5,020 51.1 20,543 13,480 52.4

    Tractor - domestic 62,009 55,488 11.8 173,519 145,492 19.3

    Tractor - exports 3,745 3,120 20.0 9,755 8,773 11.2

    Source: Company; Angel Research

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    11/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 10

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Automobile

    Analyst - YAnalyst - YAnalyst - YAnalyst - YAnalyst - Yaresh Karesh Karesh Karesh Karesh Kothariothariothariothariothari

    Auto ancillaries to track the auto sector

    While the OE demand has witnessed a slowdown in 3QFY2012

    on account of macro concerns like rising interest rates andslowdown in industrial activity, replacement sales have also seen

    weaker off-take due to general weakness in overall economic

    activity thereby negatively affecting ancillary manufacturers. We

    however, expect the demand scenario to improve in the OE as

    well as replacement segments from 1QFY2013 aided by likely

    easing of interest rates.

    During 3QFY2012, we expect auto ancillary companies to report

    moderate growth in net profit on account of slowdown in

    domestic auto sales and operating margin pressures. We expect

    a sequential contraction in the operating margins of Bosch andFAG Bearings, mainly due to INR depreciation as imports form

    a substantial portion of raw-material costs for both the

    companies. Motherson Sumi (ex. Peguform) is likely to witness

    yet another challenging quarter as the company's new plants

    are still in the process of ramping up. We expect Exide Industries

    to post improved performance sequentially; however, on a yoy

    basis, the company's results would be impacted due to increased

    competitive activity and slowdown in OE and replacement

    demand in the passenger vehicle segment. Apollo Tyres is likely

    to benefit from the strong performance of its European

    subsidiary, led by seasonal demand for winter tyres; domestic

    performance is expected to remain subdued due to sluggishdemand for CV tyres in the OE and replacement segments. We

    expect Bharat Forge to report strong top-line growth driven by

    diversified business model (one-third of revenue from non-auto

    business); however, margins are expected to trend marginally

    lower due to cost pressures.

    Outlook

    Considering the near-term macroeconomic challenges,

    we expect the auto industry to register volume growth of

    12-13% yoy for FY2012. However, we believe low penetration

    levels coupled with a healthy and sustainable economicenvironment and favorable demographics supported by

    increasing per capita income levels will drive long-term growth

    of the Indian auto industry. As such, we prefer stocks that have

    strong fundamentals, ability to deliver strong top-line

    performance and are available at attractive valuations. In the

    auto sector, we continue to prefer companies with a strong

    pricing power and high exposure to rural and exports markets.

    Among auto majors, we maintain our positive outlook onAmong auto majors, we maintain our positive outlook onAmong auto majors, we maintain our positive outlook onAmong auto majors, we maintain our positive outlook onAmong auto majors, we maintain our positive outlook on

    Mahindra and Mahindra and Ashok LMahindra and Mahindra and Ashok LMahindra and Mahindra and Ashok LMahindra and Mahindra and Ashok LMahindra and Mahindra and Ashok Leyland.eyland.eyland.eyland.eyland.

    Exhibit 6: Quarterly estimates Automobile (((((`````cr)

    Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: Price as on December 30, 2011, * Consolidated numbers; OPM adjusted for royalty payments

    CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany CMPCMPCMPCMPCMP Net SalesNet SalesNet SalesNet SalesNet Sales OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%) Net PNet PNet PNet PNet Profitrofitrofitrofitrofit EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (`````))))) EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (`````))))) P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x) TTTTTaaaaargrgrgrgrgeeeeettttt Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.

    (((((`````))))) 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E chg bpchg bpchg bpchg bpchg bp 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E (((((`````)))))

    AL 23 2,742 23.1 10.1 265 108 149.7 0.4 149.7 2.4 2.1 2.5 9.6 10.9 9.3 29 Buy

    BJAUT 1,593 4,720 17.2 20.0 (34) 791 18.6 27.3 18.6 95.0 106.2 114.6 16.8 15.0 13.9 1,719 Accumulate

    HMCL^ 1,905 6,012 17.5 12.4 124 629 23.6 31.2 23.6 92.2 116.5 130.1 20.7 16.4 14.6 - Neutral

    MSIL 920 7,335 (20.9) 5.3 (417) 179 (68.3) 6.2 (68.3) 77.9 48.7 75.1 11.8 18.9 12.3 1,051 AccumulateMM 683 7,981 31.4 12.0 (313) 654 6.0 11.1 5.8 43.2 48.0 54.6 15.8 14.2 12.5 829 Buy

    TTMT* 178 42,221 34.0 11.8 (235) 2,560 5.6 8.1 5.3 28.6 26.9 29.5 6.2 6.6 6.0 193 Accumulate

    TVSL 52 1,728 7.1 6.5 40 60 7.1 1.3 7.1 4.3 5.5 6.0 12.0 9.5 8.7 66 Buy

    Exhibit 7: Quarterly estimates Auto Ancillary (((((`````cr)

    Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: Price as on December 30, 2011, * Consolidated numbers; # December year ending; & Full year EPS is consolidated

    CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany CMPCMPCMPCMPCMP Net SalesNet SalesNet SalesNet SalesNet Sales OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%) Net PNet PNet PNet PNet Profitrofitrofitrofitrofit EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (`````))))) EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (`````))))) P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x) TTTTTaaaaargrgrgrgrgeeeeettttt Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.

    (((((`````))))) 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E chg bpchg bpchg bpchg bpchg bp 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E (((((`````)))))

    Apollo Tyres* 59 2,900 22.4 8.5 (303) 78 (35.3) 1.5 (35.3) 8.7 7.2 9.3 6.7 8.2 6.3 74 Buy

    Bharat Forge& 251 917 21.6 23.5 (79) 97 16.8 4.1 16.8 12.5 18.0 19.9 20.2 13.9 12.6 299 Buy

    Bosch# 6,778 1,930 9.9 17.8 140 230 9.4 73.3 9.4 273.4 340.8 375.7 24.8 19.9 18.0 7,514 Accumulate

    Exide Industries 105 1,211 15.4 9.6 (566) 72 (42.2) 0.8 (42.2) 7.4 5.5 7.7 14.1 18.9 13.6 128 Buy

    FAG Bearings# 1,047 307 17.1 18.8 (104) 39 14.1 23.2 14.1 73.1 103.5 113.3 14.3 10.1 9.2 1,246 Buy

    Motherson Sumi* 135 2,343 12.5 8.6 (282) 79 (25.9) 2.0 (25.9) 9.9 8.9 12.0 13.6 15.2 11.2 169 Buy

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    12/53

    11

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Banking

    Banking Index underperforms the Sensex

    Banking stocks continued with their poor run in 3QFY2012 amid

    continued concerns on the credit quality front. 2QFY2012 resultsgenerated some interest in banking stocks, leading to ~15%

    gain in the Bankex in October; however, domestic macro

    concerns in the form of slowing economic and credit growth,

    coupled with deepening sovereign debt crisis in Europe led to

    heavy selling in all Indian indices, including Bankex. Expectations

    of cut in Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) by the Reserve Bank of India

    (RBI) led to a sharp surge in banking stocks in the first week of

    December; however, with the RBI resorting to open market

    operations only to ease liquidity in the 3QFY2012 monetary

    policy, led to further selling in the Bankex.

    By the end of the quarter, the Bankex was down by 15.6%

    sequentially, underperforming the Sensex by 9.6%. Within our

    coverage universe, only LIC Housing Finance and HDFC

    managed to give positive returns of 4.6% and 1.7% qoq,

    respectively.

    Exhibit 1: 3QFY2012 stock performance

    (%)(%)(%)(%)(%) Returns (qoq)Returns (qoq)Returns (qoq)Returns (qoq)Returns (qoq) Returns (yoy)Returns (yoy)Returns (yoy)Returns (yoy)Returns (yoy)

    LIC Housing Finance 4.6 13.3

    HDFC 1.7 (10.5)

    SensexSensexSensexSensexSensex (6.1)(6.1)(6.1)(6.1)(6.1) (24.6)(24.6)(24.6)(24.6)(24.6)

    Federal Bank (8.5) (15.2)HDFC Bank (8.7) (9.0)

    South Indian Bank (9.7) (16.8)

    Yes Bank (12.4) (23.7)

    Bank of Baroda (12.7) (25.8)

    Indian Bank (13.5) (25.1)

    State Bank of India (15.3) (42.4)

    Bank of India (15.5) (41.0)

    BankexBankexBankexBankexBankex (15.6)(15.6)(15.6)(15.6)(15.6) (31.6)(31.6)(31.6)(31.6)(31.6)

    Jammu & Kashmir Bank (15.8) (13.7)

    Bank of Maharashtra (16.5) (42.0)

    Corp Bank (17.0) (45.0)

    Vijaya Bank (17.2) (55.6)

    Canara Bank (17.9) (44.8)

    Punjab National Bank (18.1) (36.1)

    Axis Bank (20.7) (40.1)

    Indian Overseas Bank (20.8) (50.0)

    ICICI Bank (21.8) (40.2)

    IDBI Bank (24.0) (52.8)

    Allahabad Bank (27.1) (49.1)

    UCO Bank (30.4) (60.8)

    Union Bank of India (30.6) (51.1)

    Oriental Bank of Commerce (32.8) (51.6)

    Syndicate Bank (34.3) (46.6)

    Andhra Bank (35.4) (46.9)

    Central Bank Of India (35.9) (57.4)Dena Bank (37.3) (58.1)

    United Bank of India (37.5) (53.2)

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Source: RBI, Angel Research; Note: #Between March 26, 2010 andDecember 17, 2010, * Between March 25, 2011 and December 16, 2011

    Exhibit 2: Deposits increase, while credit offtake slows

    399,781

    313,401328,324

    467,890

    -

    100,000

    200,000

    300,000

    400,000

    500,000

    C re di t o fft ake ( ` c r) D ep os it m ob il is at io n ( ` c r)

    FY2 011 # FY20 12*

    (`cr)

    Source: RBI, Angel Research

    Exhibit 3:Average LAF borrowings higher in 3QFY2012

    (2,000)

    (1,500)

    (1,000)

    (500)

    -

    500

    1,000

    Jan-1

    1

    Fe

    b-1

    1

    Mar-

    11

    Apr-

    11

    May-1

    1

    Jun-1

    1

    Jul-11

    Aug-1

    1

    Sep-1

    1

    Oc

    t-11

    Nov-1

    1

    Dec-1

    1

    (` bn)

    Considering the slowing growth momentum, we expect credit

    growth to slow down to 16-17% for FY2012-13.

    Credit growth slows on expected lines amid a

    weakening economic outlook

    Credit growth for the banking sector has been on a decliningtrend since the beginning of FY2011. Credit growth as of

    December 16, 2011, dropped to its lowest level since April

    2010 (20 months) to below 18% (at 17.1%) because of slowing

    economy as well as a high base effect (23.9% yoy growth).

    Incremental credit in FY2012 YTD is lower by 17.9% yoy

    compared to FY2011 YTD; however, deposit accretion continues

    to be healthy with incremental YTD deposits growing by 49.3%

    yoy. Despite increasing deposit growth rates, liquidity pressures

    increased in 3QFY2012, compared to 2QFY2012 (LAF

    borrowings averaged ~`86,500cr in 3QFY2012 vs.

    ~`42,800cr in 2QFY2012) as the widening fiscal deficit led toa substantial increase in government borrowing requirements.

    While most large banks chose not to raise their deposit rates

    over the past quarter, few mid-size banks increased them by

    15-25bp. On the advances side as well, most banks kept their

    lending rates constant over the last quarter with a few banks

    increasing their base rates by 25-50bp. Amongst banks underour coverage, Jammu and Kashmir Bank had the highest

    average base rate increase (39bp), followed by Yes Bank (38bp)

    and Federal Bank (36bp).

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    13/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 12

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Banking

    Exhibit 4: 2QFY2012 and 3QFY2012 Lending and deposit rates

    Source: Company, Angel Research

    AvgAvgAvgAvgAvg. Base rates. Base rates. Base rates. Base rates. Base rates BPLR ratesBPLR ratesBPLR ratesBPLR ratesBPLR rates FD ratesFD ratesFD ratesFD ratesFD rates

    BankBankBankBankBank 2QFY122QFY122QFY122QFY122QFY12 3QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY12 BP changeBP changeBP changeBP changeBP change 2QFY122QFY122QFY122QFY122QFY12 3QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY12 BP changeBP changeBP changeBP changeBP change 2QFY122QFY122QFY122QFY122QFY12 3QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY123QFY12 BP changeBP changeBP changeBP changeBP changeJ&KBK 9.92 10.31 39 14.50 15.00 50 9.50 9.50 -

    YESBK 10.05 10.43 38 19.75 20.00 25 9.60 9.60 -

    FEDBK 10.16 10.52 36 17.25 17.75 50 9.90 9.50 (40)

    BOM 10.37 10.70 33 15.00 15.00 - 9.35 9.35 -

    HDFCBK 9.74 10.00 26 18.50 18.50 - 9.25 9.25 -

    SBI 9.74 10.00 26 14.75 14.75 - 9.25 9.25 -

    CENTBK 10.50 10.75 25 15.00 15.00 - 9.40 9.40 -

    IDBI 10.50 10.75 25 15.25 15.25 - 9.50 9.50 -

    PNB 10.50 10.75 25 14.25 14.25 - 9.40 9.40 -

    UCOBK 10.50 10.75 25 15.00 15.00 - 9.50 9.50 -

    ICICIBK 9.76 10.00 24 18.75 18.75 - 9.25 9.25 -

    UNBK 10.52 10.75 23 15.00 15.50 50 9.25 9.25 -

    BOI 10.53 10.75 22 15.00 15.00 - 9.25 9.25 -ALLBK 10.54 10.75 21 15.00 15.00 - 9.50 9.50 -

    INDBK 10.55 10.75 20 15.00 15.00 - 9.25 9.50 25

    BOB 10.55 10.75 20 15.00 15.00 - 9.35 9.35 -

    OBC 10.55 10.75 20 15.00 15.00 - 9.75 9.75 -

    ANDHBK 10.55 10.75 20 15.00 15.00 - 9.40 9.40 -

    DENABK 10.52 10.70 18 15.75 15.75 - 9.60 9.60 -

    SIB 10.32 10.50 18 19.00 19.00 - 9.75 9.75 -

    SYNBK 10.57 10.75 18 15.00 15.00 - 9.35 9.35 -

    IOB 10.58 10.75 17 15.00 15.50 50 9.25 9.50 25

    CANBK 10.58 10.75 17 15.00 15.00 - 9.25 9.25 -

    UTDBK 10.44 10.60 16 14.85 14.85 - 9.25 9.25 -

    CRPBK 10.52 10.65 13 15.00 15.00 - 9.50 9.65 15

    AXSB 9.88 10.00 13 17.75 17.75 - 9.25 9.25 -VIJAYA 10.54 10.65 11 15.00 15.00 - 9.35 9.35 -

    Overall, we expect large private banks to post 16.2% yoy growth

    in net interest income, while PSU banks are expected to register

    10.8% yoy growth. Large private banks are expected to

    outperform on the pre-provisioning profit front also with growth

    of 13.7% yoy compared to 12.3% yoy for PSU banks. While

    large private banks are expected to report healthy 19.3% yoy

    growth on the net profit front, PSU banks are likely to post weak

    2.6% yoy growth (growth of 0.3% yoy only excluding SBI) due

    to higher provisioning expenses.Asset quality to be the key monitorable for banks going forward

    Most PSU banks witnessed asset-quality stress and reported

    higher slippages (11 out of 21 PSU banks reporting more than

    a 20% qoq increase in their absolute net NPA levels) in

    2QFY2012, primarily on account of completion of transition to

    system-based NPA recognition. Apart from slippages arising

    due to the switchover to system-based NPA recognition platform,

    delinquencies from the SME and agri books further aggravated

    asset-quality pressures and led to higher provisioning expenses

    for most banks during 2QFY2012. While broadly asset quality

    deteriorated for PSU banks, private banks on the contrary, whichhave sharply improved their asset quality over the past two years,

    remained comfortable on the asset-quality front. Apart from

    some concerns from the MFI segment, which led to higher

    restructuring during 2QFY2012 for ICICI Bank (~`740cr),

    Axis Bank (~`230cr), Yes Bank (~`90cr) and South Indian Bank

    (~`81cr), overall slippages remained contained for private banks

    under our coverage.

    The incremental increase in base rates by banks, trailing the

    hikes in repo rates by the RBI over the past year (average increase

    of 250-300bp in base rates), coupled with the slowdown in

    economic activity over the same period, evidenced from the

    GDP growth slowing to below 7% for 2QFY2012 and IIP

    contracting for the first time in more than two years by 5.1%yoy in October 2011, is expected to have made debt servicing

    more challenging for borrowers. Moreover, on account of high

    (albeit cooling) inflation as well as high fiscal and current account

    deficits, interest rates are expected to remain high until the onset

    of FY2013. Also, with sectors such as infra, real estate and

    exports continuing to face macro headwinds, asset-quality

    concerns are expected to linger. However, that said, incremental

    provisioning expenses in the current fiscal by banks on account

    of switchover to system-based NPA recognition and to meet the

    increase in NPA prudential norms and the mandated provision

    coverage ratio of 70% have led to a high base. Hence, the

    percentage increase in actual provisioning expenses in the P&L

    is not expected to increase significantly, even though genuine

    slippages are expected to increase going forward.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    14/53

    13

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Banking

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Exhibit 6: Net NPA trends (%) Private vs. PSU

    1.31

    1.39

    1.15

    1.05

    0.90

    0.78

    0.62 0.62 0.59

    1.04

    1.22 1.26

    1.271.21 1.18

    1.26 1.28

    1.53

    0.30

    0.50

    0.70

    0.90

    1.10

    1.30

    1.50

    1.70

    2QFY10 3QFY10 4QFY10 1QFY11 2QFY11 3QFY11 4QFY11 1QFY12 2QFY12

    Pvt Banks PSU Banks

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Exhibit 9: Corporate and G-Sec bond yields

    9.60

    9.55

    9.51

    9.56

    8.43

    8.32

    8.38

    8.42

    9.54

    9.58

    9.52

    9.42

    8.43

    8.44

    8.53

    8.57

    7.0

    7.5

    8.0

    8.5

    9.0

    9.5

    10.0

    AAA 1 Yr AAA 3 Yr AAA 5 Yr AAA 10 Yr Gsec 1Yr Gsec 5Yr Gsec 7Yr Gsec 10Yr

    (%)

    29-Se p-11 30-De c-11

    Source: Company, Angel Research

    Exhibit 5: Gross NPA trends (%) Private vs. PSU

    2.96

    3.19 3.123.20

    3.06 2.89

    2.65

    2.552.45

    2.32

    2.53 2.562.64 2.58 2.59 2.61

    2.71

    2.96

    1.50

    1.80

    2.10

    2.40

    2.70

    3.00

    3.30

    3.60

    2QFY10 3QFY10 4QFY10 1QFY11 2QFY11 3QFY11 4QFY11 1QFY12 2QFY12

    Pvt Banks PSU Banks

    Apart from higher absolute NPAs, another major concerning

    factor for banks in the coming quarters would be the recent

    build-up in their restructured books. With banks preferring the

    restructuring route currently to minimize provisioning expenses

    and considering the downside risks to economic growth,

    slippages could start flowing from these accounts and aggravate

    the asset-quality situation once the moratorium period ends.

    Bond yields ease after hitting three-year high during the quarter

    The 10-year G-sec yields continued their uptick and reached a

    three-year high (9%) in the first fortnight of November, as

    inflationary expectations, weakening INR and rising fiscal deficit

    hurt bond market sentiments. With the government mostly set

    to exceed its annual fiscal deficit target, bond yields continuedto harden until the RBI reassured bond market investors by

    injecting liquidity into the system through its open market

    operations. Inflation figures for November eased significantly

    Source: Company, Angel Research

    Exhibit 7: Gross NPA trend (%) for the banking industry

    2.372.46

    2.362.43 2.47 2.40

    2.272.43

    2.73

    1.50

    1.80

    2.10

    2.40

    2.70

    3.00

    3.30

    3.60

    2QFY10

    3QFY10

    4QFY10

    1QFY11

    2QFY11

    3QFY11

    4QFY11

    1QFY12

    2QFY12

    Source: Company, Angel Research

    Exhibit 8: Net NPA trend (%) for the banking industry

    1.061.16

    1.09 1.08 1.071.00 0.98

    1.04

    1.28

    0.30

    0.50

    0.70

    0.90

    1.10

    1.30

    1.50

    1.70

    2QFY1

    0

    3QFY1

    0

    4QFY1

    0

    1QFY11

    2QFY11

    3QFY11

    4QFY11

    1QFY1

    2

    2QFY1

    2

    and the RBI's dovish stance concerning interest rates helped aid

    in further easing bond yiels to 8.3% towards the end of

    December. The 10-year G-sec yields rose sharply again by

    ~25bp in the last week of December to end at 8.6% for CY2011.

    Most banks have already booked MTM losses on bond yields

    to upwards of 8.5% for 2QFY2012 and, hence, are expected

    to report only marginal MTM losses (particularly for banks

    carrying a relatively higher modified duration investment book)

    in 3QFY2012 results. Also, considering the sharp movement in

    yields during the quarter, several banks could report trading

    gain as well.

    Outlook and valuation

    The broad lending and deposit rates seem to have settled down.Further, with interest rates only poised to start declining from

    FY2013, we expect margins of banks to remain at relatively

    similar levels for 2HFY2012, as witnessed in 2QFY2012.

    Source: Bloomberg, Angel Research

    Exhibit 10: 10-year G-sec yields movement

    8.0

    8.2

    8.4

    8.6

    8.8

    9.0

    9.2

    30

    -Sep-1

    1

    7-Oct-11

    14

    -Oct-11

    21-Oct-11

    28

    -Oct-11

    4-Nov-1

    1

    11-Nov-1

    1

    19

    -Nov-1

    1

    25-Nov-1

    1

    2-Dec-1

    1

    9-Dec-1

    1

    16

    -Dec-1

    1

    23

    -Dec-1

    1

    30

    -Dec-1

    1

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    15/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 14

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Banking

    Analyst - VAnalyst - VAnalyst - VAnalyst - VAnalyst - Vaibhav Agrawaaibhav Agrawaaibhav Agrawaaibhav Agrawaaibhav Agrawal/l/l/l/l/Shrinivas BhutdShrinivas BhutdShrinivas BhutdShrinivas BhutdShrinivas Bhutdaaaaa/////VVVVVarun Varun Varun Varun Varun Varmarmarmarmarmaaaaa

    Source:C-line, Angel Research

    Exhibit 12: Large Pvt. banks price band (P/ABV)

    -

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.003.50

    4.00

    Apr-

    01

    Nov-0

    1

    Jun-0

    2

    Jan-0

    3

    Aug-0

    3

    Mar-

    04

    Oct-04

    May-0

    5

    Dec-0

    5

    Jul-06

    Fe

    b-0

    7

    Sep-0

    7

    Apr-

    08

    Nov-0

    8

    Jun-0

    9

    Jan-1

    0

    Aug-1

    0

    Mar-

    11

    Oct-11

    Source:C-line, Angel Research, Note:* For PSU banks , excl. SBI and IDBI

    Exhibit 11: PSU banks price band (P/ABV)*

    -

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    1.60

    1.80

    Apr-

    01

    Nov-0

    1

    Jun-0

    2

    Jan-0

    3

    Aug-0

    3

    Mar-

    04

    Oct-04

    May-0

    5

    Dec-0

    5

    Jul-06

    Fe

    b-0

    7

    Sep-0

    7

    Apr-

    08

    Nov-0

    8

    Jun-0

    9

    Jan-1

    0

    Aug-1

    0

    Mar-

    11

    Oct-11

    However, leftover upward deposit re-pricing coupled with increased

    saving deposit rates in cases of some banks could result in marginal

    NIM contraction. With interest rates having been at the higher-

    end for quite some time now and macro headwinds continuing to

    hit sectors such as power, textile and real estate where banks

    have significant exposures material asset-quality concerns have

    started to emerge. While NPA ratios of most PSU banks were

    expected to deteriorate during 2QFY2012on account of switchover

    to system-based NPA recognition, fresh slippages from agri-based

    and SME segments and higher NPAs from metals and

    export-oriented sectors led to higher-than-estimated provisioning

    expenses for most banks under our coverage.

    Accordingly, we prefer banks with a more conservativeasset-quality profile, especially among mid caps (for instance,

    relatively lower yield on advances and moderate credit

    growth) this includes banks such as Bank of Baroda amongst PSU

    large caps as well as Syndicate Bank and Bank of Maharashtra.

    Also, from a medium-term perspective, we continue to prefer large

    private banks with a strong structural investment case within which

    we prefer Axis Bank and ICICI Bank from a valuation perspective.

    Exhibit 13: Quarterly estimates (((((````` cr)cr )cr)cr )cr)CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany CMPCMPCMPCMPCMP Operating Income Net POperating Income Net POperating Income Net POperating Income Net POperating Income Net Profit EPS (rofit EPS (rofit EPS (rofit EPS (rofit EPS (`````) Adj B) Adj B) Adj B) Adj B) Adj BVPS (VPS (VPS (VPS (VPS (`````))))) P/E (x) P/ABP/E (x) P/ABP/E (x) P/ABP/E (x) P/ABP/E (x) P/ABV (x)V (x)V (x)V (x)V (x) TTTTTargetargetargetargetarget Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.

    (((((`````))))) 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E (((((`````)))))

    AXSB 807 3,428 19.0 1,012 13.5 82.5 93.5 109.3 462.5 524.4 607.8 9.8 8.6 7.4 1.7 1.5 1.3 1,216 Buy FEDBK 338 636 11.7 203 42.0 34.3 43.1 43.8 298.3 332.7 367.2 9.8 7.8 7.7 1.1 1.0 0.9 - Neutral

    HDFCBK 427 4,468 14.4 1,419 30.5 16.9 22.2 28.9 109.1 126.2 148.4 25.3 19.3 14.8 3.9 3.4 2.9 482 Accum.

    ICICIBK 685 4,544 11.9 1,644 14.4 44.7 53.8 63.5 478.3 508.3 544.0 15.3 12.7 10.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 954 Buy

    SIB 20 319 25.3 100 33.2 2.6 3.3 3.3 15.0 17.6 20.2 7.8 6.1 6.2 1.3 1.1 1.0 - Neutral

    YESBK 239 610 25.9 234 22.2 20.9 26.8 29.0 109.3 132.6 157.0 11.4 8.9 8.2 2.2 1.8 1.5 298 Buy

    ALLBK 115 1,700 29.9 452 8.7 29.9 38.4 35.9 160.5 190.2 217.9 3.9 3.0 3.2 0.7 0.6 0.5 131 Accum.

    ANDHBK 80 1,169 12.6 303 (8.3) 22.6 22.4 20.5 116.0 124.5 134.3 3.5 3.6 3.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 - Neutral

    BOB 661 3,454 16.4 1,208 13.0 108.0 118.4 129.0 534.4 625.6 724.9 6.1 5.6 5.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 797 Buy

    BOI 266 2,758 4.7 624 (4.4) 45.5 42.9 45.5 287.1 289.9 305.7 5.9 6.2 5.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 290 Accum.

    BOM 39 789 22.3 146 61.4 6.2 9.6 9.0 57.3 68.3 68.4 6.3 4.0 4.3 0.7 0.6 0.6 48 Buy

    CANBK 364 2,817 (3.0) 912 (17.5) 90.9 77.4 78.6 401.1 444.4 486.0 4.0 4.7 4.6 0.9 0.8 0.7 413 Accum.

    CENTBK 66 1,737 3.3 237 (41.2) 27.7 13.5 15.9 126.4 115.9 120.9 2.4 4.9 4.1 0.5 0.6 0.5 - Neutral

    CRPBK 349 1,132 2.3 371 (3.1) 95.4 99.0 92.1 481.5 537.6 599.6 3.7 3.5 3.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 390 Accum.

    DENABK 49 659 11.0 166 6.9 18.3 20.3 19.2 103.5 121.1 137.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 - Neutral

    IDBI 78 1,683 1.9 488 7.4 16.8 18.9 20.3 128.5 138.6 153.2 4.6 4.1 3.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 84 Accum.

    INDBK 184 1,457 13.3 458 (6.8) 38.8 40.0 41.8 184.4 215.7 248.2 4.7 4.6 4.4 1.0 0.9 0.7 199 Accum.

    IOB 74 1,711 15.5 332 43.5 17.3 17.7 19.9 128.4 143.3 156.0 4.2 4.2 3.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 82 Accum.

    J&KBK 677 538 15.2 201 19.5 126.9 157.0 167.4 717.4 837.2 965.1 5.3 4.3 4.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 724 Accum.

    OBC 197 1,307 3.6 302 (26.1) 51.5 39.4 44.2 350.0 359.1 387.1 3.8 5.0 4.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 213 Accum.

    PNB 784 4,568 12.5 1,274 16.9 139.9 156.6 161.2 628.1 756.0 882.3 5.6 5.0 4.9 1.2 1.0 0.9 926 Buy

    SBI 1,620 14,584 18.0 3,113 10.1 130.1 168.7 206.7 967.6 1,067.2 1,237.9 12.4 9.6 7.8 1.7 1.5 1.3 2,029 Buy

    SYNBK 69 1,581 15.9 316 23.2 18.3 21.8 23.1 116.1 132.7 150.6 3.7 3.1 3.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 90 Buy

    UCOBK 46 1,289 1.0 296 (1.7) 12.6 14.9 15.5 67.6 76.1 82.2 3.6 3.1 2.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 - Neutral

    UNBK 170 2,272 7.7 530 (8.4) 39.6 36.7 39.4 203.3 223.0 246.9 4.3 4.6 4.3 0.8 0.8 0.7 191 Accum.

    UTDBK 47 788 11.7 138 (15.1) 13.3 13.2 14.4 101.2 101.9 107.5 3.5 3.5 3.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 54 Buy

    VIJAYA 45 650 1.9 170 12.1 8.8 9.8 9.5 65.3 72.8 72.4 5.2 4.6 4.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 - Neutral

    HDFC 649 1,553 17.0 1,047 17.5 24.1 28.3 31.2 118.1 129.3 159.3 26.9 23.0 20.8 5.5 5.0 4.1 - NeutralLICHF 222 458 (16.1) 275 28.6 20.5 20.5 27.2 87.8 104.2 126.0 10.8 10.8 8.1 2.5 2.1 1.8 - Neutral

    Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: Price as on December 30, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    16/53

    15

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Capital Goods

    Capital Goods - Despair continues

    For 3QFY2012, we expect companies in our capital goods (CG)

    universe to post moderate top-line growth of 12.7% yoy.However, on the bottom-line front, the picture is mixed, with

    most companies in our coverage universe posting a decline

    mainly on account of margin pressure and, in some cases, due

    to higher interest cost.

    ABB India (CMP/TP: `584/`427) (Rating: Sell)

    For 4QCY2011, we expect ABB India (ABB) to post strong

    top-line growth of 16.4% yoy to `2,412cr, driven by the

    company's balanced performance across all segments. EBITDA

    margin is likely witness a sharp uptick of 352bp yoy to 5.1%

    (4QCY2010 margins were suppressed by higher provisioning

    on account of rural electrification projects). Also, on a qoq basis,

    we expect margins to improve by ~120bp. Aided by strongAided by strongAided by strongAided by strongAided by strong

    revenue growth and an extremely low base of the priorrevenue growth and an extremely low base of the priorrevenue growth and an extremely low base of the priorrevenue growth and an extremely low base of the priorrevenue growth and an extremely low base of the prior-year-year-year-year-year

    period, ABB's bottom line is expected to jump eightperiod, ABB's bottom line is expected to jump eightperiod, ABB's bottom line is expected to jump eightperiod, ABB's bottom line is expected to jump eightperiod, ABB's bottom line is expected to jump eight-fold to-fold to-fold to-fold to-fold to

    `````61.9cr61.9cr61.9cr61.9cr61.9cr.....

    Areva T&D (CMP/TP: `164/-) (Rating: Neutral)

    For 4QCY2011, Areva T&D is expected to post subdued

    top-line growth of 4.2% yoy to `1,383cr, mainly on account of

    lower volumes, pricing pressures and execution slowdown.

    Consequently, EBITDA margin is expected to compress by

    ~443bp yoy to 9.0%, although we expect a sequential

    improvement of ~100bp due to slight easing of pricing

    pressures. LLLLLed by muted growth and dip in margin, Areva'sed by muted growth and dip in margin, Areva'sed by muted growth and dip in margin, Areva'sed by muted growth and dip in margin, Areva'sed by muted growth and dip in margin, Areva's

    PPPPPAAAAAT is expected to decline by 35.5% yoy toT is expected to decline by 35.5% yoy toT is expected to decline by 35.5% yoy toT is expected to decline by 35.5% yoy toT is expected to decline by 35.5% yoy to `````56.8cr56.8cr56.8cr56.8cr56.8cr.....

    BHEL (CMP/TP: `239/-) (Rating: Neutral)

    We expect BHEL to post top-line growth of 20.5% yoy to

    `10,873cr for 3QFY2012. This growth is on the back of its

    strong order book of ~`1.6tn, which provides revenue visibility.

    On the EBITDA front, the company's margin is expectedto compress by ~296bp yoy to 20.0%. Hence, theHence, theHence, theHence, theHence, the

    companycompanycompanycompanycompanys bottom-line growth is expected to be subdued ats bottom-line growth is expected to be subdued ats bottom-line growth is expected to be subdued ats bottom-line growth is expected to be subdued ats bottom-line growth is expected to be subdued at

    4.4% yoy to4.4% yoy to4.4% yoy to4.4% yoy to4.4% yoy to `````1,465cr1,465cr1,465cr1,465cr1,465cr.....

    BGR Energy (CMP/TP: `179/-) (Rating: Neutral)

    We expect BGR Energy's (BGR) top line to be under pressure

    due to high base created in 3QFY2011 and partly due to

    execution delays. The top line is expected to decline by 28.3%

    yoy to `901.1cr. On the operating front, EBITDA margin is

    expected to come at 12.0%. Interest cost is expected to stretch

    further (owing to hike in interest rates and enhanced workingcapital debt levels); which, along with slumped revenue, is likely

    to drag the bottom line down by 46.1% yoy tothe bottom line down by 46.1% yoy tothe bottom line down by 46.1% yoy tothe bottom line down by 46.1% yoy tothe bottom line down by 46.1% yoy to `````47.2cr47.2cr47.2cr47.2cr47.2cr.....

    Crompton Greaves (CMP/TP: `126/`146) (Rating: Buy)

    For 3QFY2012, we project Crompton Greaves to report

    moderate top-line growth of 10.5% yoy to `2,649cr, mainly

    aided by a favorable currency translation gain for its

    international revenue (thereby overshadowing persistent

    weakness in the power system segment, which has remained a

    drag since the past few quarters). On the EBITDA front, the

    company's margin is expected to decline sharply by ~470bp

    yoy to 9.5%. However, we expect an uptick of 110bp qoq in the

    companys margin, factoring in the cooling of commodity prices

    (read copper). PAT for the quarter is expected to drop by 42.6%

    yoy to `133.6cr.

    Jyoti Structures (CMP/TP: `39/`49) (Rating: Buy)

    For 3QFY2012, we expect Jyoti Structures to post decent

    top-line growth of 18.4% yoy to `652.7cr. We expect the

    company's EBITDA margin to marginally contract by ~91bp

    yoy to 10.5%. Interest cost is expected to increase due to higher

    working capital borrowings. Against this backdrop, the

    company's PAT is expected to decline by 16.0% yoy to `20.8cr.

    KEC International (CMP/TP: `36/`45) (Rating: Buy)

    For 3QFY2012, KEC International (KEC) is expected to register

    strong growth of 18.2% yoy to `1,266cr on the back of executionof its robust order book. On the EBITDA front, despite increased

    contribution from SAE Towers, the company's margin is expected

    to contract by ~313bp yoy to 8.5% due to margin pressures

    faced by the company in the domestic business. Interest cost is

    expected to remain at elevated levels, but it is likely to be offset

    by an extraordinary gain of `70cr (sale of land), which will

    possibly boost the company's PAT by 48.1% yoy to `85.9cr.

    Thermax (CMP/TP: `395/`457) (Rating: Buy)

    For 3QFY2012, we expect Thermax to report a 3.0% yoy decline

    in its top line to `1,204cr, as high base effect created in

    3QFY2011 and weak order inflows since the last couple of

    quarters will keep the company's revenue under strict check.

    The company's EBITDA margin is likely to compress by ~110bp

    yoy to 10.7% due to higher contribution of low-margin EPC

    contracts in the aggregate revenue. Lower revenue and margin

    contraction are expected to drag down the company's PAT by

    10.8% yoy to `89.4cr.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    17/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 16

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Capital Goods

    Source: C-line, Angel Research

    Abs. ReturnsAbs. ReturnsAbs. ReturnsAbs. ReturnsAbs. Returns Relative to SensexRelative to SensexRelative to SensexRelative to SensexRelative to Sensex

    (%)(%)(%)(%)(%) (%)(%)(%)(%)(%)

    BSE Sensex (6.1) -

    BSE Cap Goods (24.9) (18.8)

    A B B (15.7) (9.7)

    Areva T&D (24.7) (18.6)

    B H E L (27.0) (20.9)

    BGR Energy Sys. (44.4) (38.4)

    Crompton Greaves (17.4) (11.3)

    Jyoti Structures (41.9) (35.8)

    K E C Intl. (40.8) (34.7)

    Thermax (10.4) (4.4)

    Exhibit 1: 3QFY2012 Sensex vs. CG stocks

    Source: C-line, Angel Research

    Exhibit 2: CG index Relative returns to the Sensex

    17.2

    (6.2)

    (14.1)

    9.4

    (9.7)(7.1)

    48.6

    (10.7)

    0.6

    (0.6)

    3.5

    (4.6) (5.8)(9.0)

    8.2

    (10.1)

    (18.8)(30.0)

    (20.0)

    (10.0)0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    3Q08

    4Q08

    1Q09

    2Q09

    3Q09

    4Q09

    1Q10

    2Q10

    3Q10

    4Q10

    1Q11

    2Q11

    3Q11

    4Q11

    1Q12

    2Q12

    3Q12

    (%)

    Key developments

    T&D space on gradual recovery; PGCIL ordering

    gathers momentum

    After a dry spell in the initial part of the year, PGCIL's ordering

    has intensified considerably. YTD FY2012 orders

    (April-November) grew magnificently by 157% yoy to

    ~`9,000cr, largely driven by a spectacular surge in October

    2011 (orders worth`4,074cr were tendered during the month).

    Orders were dominated by the transmission towers segment

    (34.4%), followed by the sub-stations (25%) and conductors

    (21.8%) segments.

    Capital Goods Index Leap from the valley into the well

    During 3QFY2012, the Capital Goods (CG) Index was one of

    the worst performers, falling 25% compared compared to the6.1% fall of the Sensex. Broader markets witnessed a steep

    slide on the back of global crisis and sluggish domestic industrial

    growth, led by elevated interest rates and stubbornly high

    inflation. The discouraging economic indicators and chronic

    lack of confidence among investors led to extremely bearish

    sentiments for CG stocks. All companies in our CG universe

    performed miserably, with BGR Energy, KEC International and

    Jyoti Structures emerging as major losers, nosediving 40-45%

    in absolute terms and underperforming the Sensex by 34-38%.

    Rest of the companies in our universe lost around 10-27%.

    Source: C-line, Angel Research

    Exhibit 3: PGCILs ordering on an uptick...

    -

    500

    1,000

    1,500

    2,000

    2,500

    3,000

    3,500

    4,000

    4,500

    Ap r-1 1 M ay -1 1 J un -1 1 Ju l-1 1 A ug -1 1 S ep -1 1 O ct-1 1 No v-1 1

    (cr)

    Competition intensifiesThe T&D space is getting extremely competitive with market

    leaders (KEC International, Kalpataru and Jyoti Structures,

    among others) being invaded on their turf, mainly by industry

    players and new entrants. In the tower EPC space, Electrical

    Manufacturing Company (EMC) has clearly surprised by

    pocketing orders worth `970cr YTD in FY2012 (30% of the

    segment's orders), thereby comfortably surpassing the market

    leaders. Notably, KEC International has struggled to secure

    orders from PGCIL and has bagged only one order worth`70cr

    YTD in FY2012 (vs.`740cr orders won last year).

    In the 765kV sub-station segment, after the exclusion of the

    circuit breaker in the scope of contract in early FY2012, new

    entrants such as L&T, EMC, Crompton Greaves and Techno

    Electric have rushed to capture the pie of this lucrative

    high-voltage segment as general products and civil works

    constitute a major portion of the sub-station contract. These

    new entrants have posed a tough competition to traditional

    T&D majors such as ABB, Areva and Siemens (which together

    commanded 100% market share in the previous year) and have

    already captured ~71% market share YTD in FY2012.

    The transformer market is largely controlled by domestic players

    YTD in FY2012. During this period, market share of Crompton

    Greaves remained fairly stable at 22% and Transformers and

    We believe investment activity is likely to remain subdued in the

    near-to-medium term. Acceleration in awarding of road projects

    and improved ordering in the T&D space are few silver

    linings in the otherwise dampened investment climate.

    Overall, a substantial pick-up in the implementation of

    big-ticket economic reforms, growth impulse and anticipated

    easing of monetary policy will remain key drivers for CG stocks,

    in our view.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    18/53

    17

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report

    Capital Goods

    Analyst - Shailesh KAnalyst - Shailesh KAnalyst - Shailesh KAnalyst - Shailesh KAnalyst - Shailesh Kanani / Hemang Thakeranani / Hemang Thakeranani / Hemang Thakeranani / Hemang Thakeranani / Hemang Thaker

    Exhibit 4: Quarterly estimates (((((`````cr)cr)cr)cr)cr)

    Source: Company; Angel Research; Note: Price as on December 30, 2011; * December year ending; For KEC, we expect an extraordinary income worth `70cr for 3QFY2012E.

    CompanyCompanyCompanyCompanyCompany CMPCMPCMPCMPCMP Net SalesNet SalesNet SalesNet SalesNet Sales OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%)OPM (%) Net PNet PNet PNet PNet Profitrofitrofitrofitrofit EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (`````))))) EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (EPS (`````))))) P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x)P/E (x) TTTTTararararargggggeeeeettttt Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.Reco.

    (((((`````))))) 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E chg bpchg bpchg bpchg bpchg bp 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg 3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E3QFY12E % chg% chg% chg% chg% chg FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E FY11FY11FY11FY11FY11 FY12EFY12EFY12EFY12EFY12E FY13EFY13EFY13EFY13EFY13E (((((`````)))))

    ABB* 584 2,412 16.4 5.1 352 61.9 815.0 2.9 815.0 3.0 8.9 17.8 195.6 65.7 32.8 427 Sell

    Areva* 164 1,383 4.2 9.0 (443) 56.8 (35.5) 2.4 (35.5) 7.8 7.2 8.4 21.0 22.8 19.5 - Neutral

    BHEL 239 10,873 20.5 20.0 (296) 1,465 4.4 6.0 4.4 24.7 28.7 26.0 9.7 8.3 9.2 - Neutral

    BGR 179 901.1 (28.3) 12.0 29 47.2 (46.1) 6.5 (46.1) 44.8 36.0 33.6 4.0 5.0 5.3 - Neutral

    Crompt. Greav. 126 2,649 10.5 9.5 (469) 133.6 (42.6) 2.1 (42.6) 14.4 8.1 12.2 8.7 15.5 10.3 146 Buy

    Jyoti Structures# 39 652.7 18.4 10.5 (91) 20.8 (16.0) 2.0 (16.1) 12.1 14.2 12.2 3.2 2.7 3.2 49 Buy

    Kec Intl' 36 1,266 18.2 8.5 (314) 85.9 48.1 3.3 48.1 8.0 6.7 8.9 4.5 5.3 4.0 45 Buy

    Thermax 395 1,204 (3.0) 10.7 (110) 89.4 (10.8) 7.5 (10.8) 32.0 34.6 35.6 12.3 11.4 11.1 457 Buy

    Rectifier (TRIL) emerged as a leader in transformer orders,

    pocketing 44% of the orders.

    ...However, BTG space remains in doldrums

    With numerous headwinds surmounting the power sector

    (inadequate coal supplies, land acquisition issues and huge

    losses at SEB levels), the BTG space has come to a virtual

    standstill. As per the corporate announcements made so far in

    3QFY2012, no major order is booked in the BTG space. Instead,

    management commentaries suggest further sluggishness in

    the sector, owing to slowdown in the economy. Given the

    below-expectation ordering and domestic players progressing

    to set up BTG manufacturing facilities through JVs (seven players

    in total vs. the previous monopoly of BHEL), we believecompetition in the BTG space is set to intensify and predatory

    pricing is imminent.

    Depreciating INR will have a mixed impact:Depreciating INR will have a mixed impact:Depreciating INR will have a mixed impact:Depreciating INR will have a mixed impact:Depreciating INR will have a mixed impact: The sudden and

    substantial deprecation of the INR will certainly have its bearing

    on companies in our CG universe. INR depreciation will help

    reducing competition, especially from Chinese/Korean players

    in the BTG and T&D space, as imported equipment (BTG or

    T&D) will now turn expensive and will likely narrow the price

    differential with domestic equipment.

    In contrast, the INR slide weighs on operating costs for companiessuch as ABB, Areva and BGR, who import sizable quantity of

    raw materials (18-40%). Companies such as Crompton Greaves,

    Thermax, Jyoti Structures and KEC International will be

    moderately affected, as their major raw materials (steel and

    copper) are global commodities.

    Overall, the outlook remains challenging:Overall, the outlook remains challenging:Overall, the outlook remains challenging:Overall, the outlook remains challenging:Overall, the outlook remains challenging: A handful of positives,

    especially in the T&D space, does very little to warrant a change

    in our pessimistic view. Against the backdrop of economicslowdown, we believe the overall picture remains gloomy for

    market leaders (read BHEL, ABB and Crompton Greaves,

    among others) as well as for mid-size companies (such as

    Jyoti Structures, KEC International and BGR). While the

    government is speeding up its efforts to resolve the key issues in

    the power sector, we believe it will take a while for the sector to

    witness dramatic improvements. Given this, we expect the

    slowdown to continue for the next couple of quarters. Therefore,

    companies catering to the power sector will witness a high

    degree of discomfort unless the core concerns soothe.

    VVVVValuations have come to attractive levels:aluations have come to attractive levels:aluations have come to attractive levels:aluations have come to attractive levels:aluations have come to attractive levels: Most companies in

    our coverage universe have witnessed a sharp fall in stock prices

    over the past couple of months, which was in-line with our

    negative stance on the sector. This fall has brought stocks to

    attractive levels, considering the latent opportunities offered by

    these companies. Hence, we believe investors with a medium

    to long-term view should start considering accumulating quality

    large and mid-cap companies. Considering this, we prefer

    companies with diversified revenue streams, healthy return

    ratios, strong balance sheet and compelling valuations (on the

    back of subdued expectations). Therefore, we like CromptonTherefore, we like CromptonTherefore, we like CromptonTherefore, we like CromptonTherefore, we like CromptonGreaves and Thermax in the largeGreaves and Thermax in the largeGreaves and Thermax in the largeGreaves and Thermax in the largeGreaves and Thermax in the large -----cap space andcap space andcap space andcap space andcap space and

    Jyoti Structures in the mid-Jyoti Structures in the mid-Jyoti Structures in the mid-Jyoti Structures in the mid-Jyoti Structures in the mid-cap space. Fcap space. Fcap space. Fcap space. Fcap space. For BHELor BHELor BHELor BHELor BHEL, we continue, we continue, we continue, we continue, we continue

    to maintain our negative stance, owing to structuralto maintain our negative stance, owing to structuralto maintain our negative stance, owing to structuralto maintain our negative stance, owing to structuralto maintain our negative stance, owing to structural

    issues heightened competition, margin erosion and slowingissues heightened competition, margin erosion and slowingissues heightened competition, margin erosion and slowingissues heightened competition, margin erosion and slowingissues heightened competition, margin erosion and slowing

    of order inflows.of order inflows.of order inflows.of order inflows.of order inflows.

  • 8/3/2019 3QFY2012ResultPreview-January2012

    19/53

    Refer to important Disclosures at the end of the report 18

    3QFY2012 Results Preview||||| January 3, 2012

    Cement

    Cement dispatches growth at decent 8.4% yoy inOctober-November 2011

    Cement demand, after growing moderately (3.1% yoy) in1HFY2012, showed some signs of improvement and grew by

    decent 8.4% yoy in October-November 2011. For 8MFY2012,

    cement demand growth remained low at 4.4% yoy, as high

    interest rates and policy inaction on the government's part

    affected construction demand. In all, we expect cement demand

    growth to be at ~5% for FY2012E.

    During October-November 2011, JP Associates was the top

    performer among large players with 27.1% yoy growth in its

    dispatches; while, Ambuja Cements (Ambuja) reported dispatch

    growth of 14.1% yoy. Dispatch growth for both the players was

    on account of capacity addition and minimum/no exposure to

    southern India, where a low-demand scenario continues.

    Price situation

    All-India average cement prices, after increasing during the

    end of the previous quarter, continued their upward movement

    and increased by`5-15/bag and`8-10/bag in October and

    November, respectively. However, push-up in sales by calendar

    year-ending companies has led to a `5-10/bag decline in

    average prices from earlier levels during mid-December.

    Southern region:Southern region:Southern region:Southern region:Southern region: Although demand in the region remains

    sluggish, prices in the region have held ground due to the strong

    production discipline amongst players in the region. Prices at

    the start of the quarter were at `270-280/bag, and they are

    now at`275-285/bag.

    Northern region:Northern region:Northern region:Northern region:Northern region: Prices in the northern region, which had

    increased on an average by`9-10/bag at the end of the last

    quarter and witnessed an increase of `5-10/bag and

    `10-15/bag during October and November, respectively, in

    anticipation of demand pick-up after the end of monsoons,

    corrected during mid-December on an average by

    `15-20/bag as improvement in demand was lower than

    expected. Prices are currently quoting at`255-275/bag .

    Eastern region:Eastern region:Eastern region:Eastern region:Eastern region: In the eastern region, prices are currently

    in the broad range of `300-330/bag, up `50-60/bag from

    `245-265/bag at the end of 2QFY2012. This sharp increase in

    prices was because of strong demand after the festivital season.

    WWWWWestern region:estern region:estern region:estern region:estern region: Prices in the western region stood at

    `230-275/bag during mid-September. Sand availability issues

    prevalent in Maharashtra in the last quarter were sorted out

    during 3QFY2012, which along with upbeat infrastructure

    growth in Gujarat aided demand pick-up in the region. On the

    back of good demand, prices moved upwards during the quarter

    and are currently at`275-295/bag.

    Central region:Central region:Central region:Central region:Central region: Prices in the central region, which were at

    `225-240/bag at the beginning of the quarter, increased by

    ~`35/bag during the first two months of the quarter. However,

    prices have fallen by`10-15/bag since then and are currently at

    `250-265/bag as demand in the region continues to be moderate.

    Cement stocks Performance on the bourses

    During 3QFY2012, the large-cap cement stocks in our coverage

    universe outperformed the Sensex, which lost 6.1%.

    Shree Cements was the biggest gainer, up 18.2%. Ambuja, ACC

    and UltraTech rose by 4.6%, 3.5% and 2.0%, respectively.

    JK Lakshmi, however, was the biggest loser, falling by 11.5%.

    Source: BSE, Angel Research

    Exhibit 3: Cement stocks performance in the bourses in 3QFY2012

    (6.1)

    3.5

    4.6

    (9.2)

    (11.5)

    2.3

    18.2

    2.0

    (12.0) (7.0) (2.0) 3.0 8.0 13.0 18.0

    Sensex

    ACC

    Ambuja

    In