3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the...

16
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MKETIUG UP TEE BuARD uF DIRECTORS OF TARRANT COUNTY WATER COwTRuL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER ONE HELD IW TEE DISTRICT OFFICE, IN FORT WORTH, TEXAS, OilTEE 11TE DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1936, AT 3:00 P.M. All Directors were present and participating, as follows: C. A. Eickman Joe B. Eogsett E. E. Bewley ViT. S. Cooke W. K. Stripling President Hickman acted in his capacity as President of the Board and Director Stripling acted in his capacity as Secretary, whereupon pro- ceedings were had and done, as follows: 1. Minutes of the meetings of July 31, 1936, August 10, 1936, 3:00 P.M. and August 10, 1936,4:30 P.M.,were read, approved and ordered of record. 2. Attached to the minutes of this meeting as Exhibit "A" is a state- ment of the financial condition of this District as of this a ate, which shows consecutive and inclusive Voucher-checks Nos. 4953 "k° 4957 issued since the last regular meeting for the aggregate sum of $1,099*00. It also shows conse- cutive and inclusive proposed voucher-checks Nos.4958 4991 for the aggre- gate sum of !$218,990«50» There was full consideration of these matters; where- upon Director Stripling made a motion, seconded by Director Eogsett that the above listed intermeeting checks be ratified and confirmed; that the proposed voucher-checks (excepting Nos. 4988 and 4989. payable to Barker Bros., which were reserved for later action) be approved for execution and delivered to the respective parties entitled to receive the same in liquidation of accounts now do and payable by this District* Upon a vote being taken, the motion was car- ried, and it was so ordered. 3. Attached to these minutes in folio and as -tixhibit "B" hereto are

Transcript of 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the...

Page 1: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MKETIUG UP TEE BuARD uF DIRECTORS OFTARRANT COUNTY WATER COwTRuL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER ONE

HELD IW TEE DISTRICT OFFICE, IN FORT WORTH, TEXAS, Oil TEE11TE DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1936, AT 3:00 P.M.

All Directors were present and participating, as follows:

C. A. Eickman Joe B. EogsettE. E. Bewley ViT. S. CookeW. K. Stripling

President Hickman acted in his capacity as President of the Board

and Director Stripling acted in his capacity as Secretary, whereupon pro-

ceedings were had and done, as follows:

1.

Minutes of the meetings of July 31, 1936, August 10, 1936, 3:00 P.M.

and August 10, 1936, 4:30 P.M., were read, approved and ordered of record.

2.

Attached to the minutes of this meeting as Exhibit "A" is a state-

ment of the financial condition of this District as of this a ate, which shows

consecutive and inclusive Voucher-checks Nos. 4953 "k° 4957 issued since the

last regular meeting for the aggregate sum of $1,099*00. It also shows conse-

cutive and inclusive proposed voucher-checks Nos. 4958 ° 4991 for the aggre-

gate sum of !$218,990«50» There was full consideration of these matters; where-

upon Director Stripling made a motion, seconded by Director Eogsett that the

above listed intermeeting checks be ratified and confirmed; that the proposed

voucher-checks (excepting Nos. 4988 and 4989. payable to Barker Bros., which

were reserved for later action) be approved for execution and delivered to the

respective parties entitled to receive the same in liquidation of accounts now

do and payable by this District* Upon a vote being taken, the motion was car-

ried, and it was so ordered.

3.

Attached to these minutes in folio and as -tixhibit "B" hereto are

Page 2: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

documents, as i'ollows:

1. - Letter of Hawley, Freese & Nichols by John B. Hawley, dated

September 11, 1936, recommending that Barker Bros, be paid in full for their

completion of the work required under their contract for the construction of

Section "A11 of the District's levee in the city of Fort Worth, subject only

to the recommendation that $82 .00 be retained from the final estimate of the

contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure of the con-

tractors to procure suitable Bermuda Grass sod upon the levees.

2. - Letter of the engineers signed by J. K. Alewine, Resident Engineer,

dated September 8, 1936, wherein he certifies that the work to be done under' the

contract of Messrs, barker Bros, has been substantially completed and recommends

that $821;.00 (one-tenth of the amount involved in the item of "sod") be retained

until the Bermuda grass on the levees has reached a satisfactory growth.

3. - Affidavit of 'c. B. Barker that all bills for labor and materials

procured in connection with the contract (P.W.A. Docket No. 598 4-) have been

paid and statement of Butcher & Sweeney, who were the only subcontractors on

the levee work under Barker Bros., that they have been fully paid for all labor

and materials furnished by them.

4. - Letter of Hawley & Freese by J. K. Alewine, Resident Engineer,

dated September I;, 193&, wherewith he transmits to the Directors of the Dis-

trict periodic estimate &o. 8 for work done by Barker Bros. There was also

presented with the above designated documents certificate of the contractors

as to work done and payments received on P.W.A. Form 1-23 (Revised 8-6-35) "^°

which reference here is made as to part hereof.

There was full examination of the recommendations of the engineers

and all data in reference to the performance of the work under the contract

of the District with Barker Bros.; whereupon Director Stripling made a motion,

seconded by Director Hogsett, that the recommendation of the engineers relat-

Page 3: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

ing to the payment of Estimate Wo. 8 on Section "A" of the levee do be ap-

proved; that said estimate be considered the final estimate for payment under

the contract of Barker Bros, for the District, save only as to the sum $821;.00,

which shall be retained by this District as a fund to indemnify it against such

losses as may occur through the failure of the contractors to develop a satis-

factory sod of Bermuda grass upon the levees, as provided for by the contract;

further that this District shall instantly accept the levees as constructed

and remodelled by Barker Bros, under their contract with this District, as

being substantially complete or wholly complete, in compliance with the con-

tract, save only as to the Bermuda sod hereinbefore referred to; that the Dis-

trict's Voucher-check Wo. lj.988, payable to Barker Bros, for the sum of §10,070.3 ,

and the District's voucher-check Wo. ij999» payable to Barker Bros, (for recon-

structing fence at Oakwood Cemetery) for $8,22 be both approved for payment,

execution and delivery to Barker Bros, in satisfaction of their matured claims

against this District. Upon a vote being taken, the motion was carried, and

it was so ordered.

k.

The engineers presented their estimate Ho. i(5 for fees accrued to

them under their contract with the District for the sum of $41»26. In con-

sideration of this matter Director Stripling made a motion, seconded by

Director Bewley that the claim be approved for payment and that the District's

Voucher-check Wo. l;990j payable to Hawley & Creese in the sum of j.1.26 be

executed and delivered to the engineers in payment of said account.

It was brought to the attention of the Directors the fact that the

District held in its possession the bid bonds delivered to the District at

the time the bids were received on Section "b" of the District's levee, as

follow s:

-> QO

Page 4: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

1. Cage Bros, and J. C. Ruby by National Surety

Corporation $ 2,500.00

2. Barker Bros, by United States Fidelity and

Guaranty Company $0,000*00

3. Haralson £ Cunningham by Royal Indemnity Co. 2,75 .00

I;. Lone Star Construction Co. by Fidelity &

Deposit Company of dryland 2, 00,00

It was further brought to the attention of the Directors that the

District would on this day ratify and approve the "Construction Bond" of

Cage Bros, and J. C.Ruby, executed by the National Surety Corporation, for

the sum of E08»935«50» whereupon the above designated "Bid Bonds" would cease

to have force and usefulness. Upon consideration of this matter, Director

Cooke made a motion that, instantly upon the approval of the construction bond

hereinbefore designated, each and all of the above designated bid bonds be

declared without further force and effect and that they thereupon be returned

to the several persons entitled to receive the same.

6,

Harry J. Adams, superintendent of Parks for the city of Fort Worth,

appeared to present to the Directors voucher-check Wo. k9®7» payable to the

ordor of the city of Fort orth for the benefit of the Park Department, dated

August 10, 1936, for the sum of $600.00. Mr. Adams stated that the Park Board

did not desire to endorse the check with the voucher written as shown on the

reverse side of the check presented. x'he objection was that the voucher v/ould

constitute a broad release of the District as to all matters; whereas, the

voucher should be confined to the agreement whereby the Park Department under-

took to furnish materials and labor necessary to provide a roadway over the

levee in Trinity Park, which otherwise would have been done as an obligation

of the District. There was full consideration of this matter; whereupon

Page 5: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

Director Bewley made .a motion, seconded by Director Hogsett that the voucher

endorsement on check No. ij.907 be cancelled, and further that as substitute

therefor there be placed thereon voucher endorsement, as follows:

"This check when endorsed and paid will fully satisfy the Park Depart-

ment of the City of - 'ort '-'forth for all materials and labor which it has fur-

nished in placing a roadway over the levee in Trinity ^ark, under agreement with

the District; and further shall extinguish all liability of this District by rea-

son of its prior obligation to construct said roadway."

7.

There was presented to the Directors for consideration the District's

Voucher-Check No. k9 t payable to A. J, Spears for the sum of $17*10 proposed

to be issued in satisfaction of his services in placing and restoring the fence

around the land of T. '•!•'. Thompson, '-i-liis was based upon the certificate of J»

K. Alewine certifying that the amount was due for labor involved in the con-

struction of 570 linear feet of fence, at an agreed price of three cents (3X)

per foot. The materials being furnished by the District. Upon consideration

of this matter, Director Cooke made a motion that the claim be approved as due

and payable; and that said check be executed and delivered to A. J. Spears in

payment of said account. Upon a vote being taken, the motion was carried, and

it v/ac so ordered*

8.

No further business was presented, and the meeting was adjourned.

ATTESTED:

As President

Page 6: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

EXHIBIT "A" SEPTEMBER U, 19363:00 p.H.

TARRANT COUNTY WATiER CurxROL AMD _IMPRuVE[vlEiMT PI STRICT. i^IUMBER OflK

VOUCHER-CHECKS ISSUED AUGUST 28, 1936 TO SEPTEMBER 1, 1956, INCLUSIVE

NO. ISSUED I'O

C. B. Brewster)4953 Maud E. Guess )

H. T. Cooper )495U Marjorie Rowell4955 B. vsr. Bintuff

4956 C. L. McNair

14.957 A. W. McDonald, Secy.,Board of Water Engineers

COVERING

Land purchaseLevee ImprovementSection "B"Salary, August 1936

(Salary Aug. 1936, Custodian E.M.(Allowance, August 1936(Salary, Aug. 1936, Custodian B.P.(Allowance August 1936(Reimbursement for amount paid C»(Lo McNair for Salary as Gage At-(tendant, August 1936

T O T A L

$100.007.50

§ 80.00Too

AMOUNT

$ 819-00

65.00

87*50

2O.OO

$1,099.00

DISTRIBUTION OF VuUCHER-CHECKS V&953 TO ^4957. INCLUSIVE

Levee Improvements, SectionOffice.Eagle Mountain DamBridgeport Dam

"B"

T O T A L

819.0065-00

107.50j.Q7*30

1,099.00

oooooooooooooooo

NO. ISSUED TO

4958 C. A. Hickman4959 E. E. Bewley4960 W. K. Stripling4961 Joe B. Hogsett4962 W. S. Cooke4963 Sidney L.Samuels4964 Ireland Hampton4965 E. B. Cheatham

4966 Hawley, Freese & Nichols

4967 R. D. McDaniel4968 Leo Warner4969 H. R. McDaniel4970 A-l Typewriter Shop4971 The Babcock Co.4972 Vfau Capps Bldg0 Co*4973 Fan Rent Co.4974 Fort Worth Bluprint Co.4975 The Gaither Oil Co.4976 C. A. Hickman4977 Home Telephone & Electric Co.4978 Morrow Wrecking Co.4979 The Southwest Telephone Co.4980 Southwestern Bell Telephone Co«4981 Stafford-Lcwdofi Co.4982 Texas Power & Light Co.4983 Mrs. Happy Shelton, County Clk04984 H. D. Young, Postmaster4985 Continental National Bank,

Fort Worth, Texas4986 Continental National Bank,

Fort Worth, Texas.

VOUCHER-CHECKS #4953 TO #4991 INCLUSIVE

COVERING

Director's FeesDirector's FeesDirector's FeesDirector's FeesDirector's FeesLegal ServicesLegal ServicesSalary(Engineering & Supervision(Month of August, E.M.(Month of August, B.P.Labor, B.P0Labor, B.P.Labor, B.P.Typewriter RibbonEnvelopes & PaperOffice Rent, September

AMOUNT

$100.00lOOoOO

"B"

Thompson Land

Rental Electric Fan, P.W.A. Engineer's OfficeBlue prints, Levee Improv. Section50 Gal. Gas for Truck, E.M.Traveling ExpensePhone Service, E.M.Material for Fence, T.T.Phone Service, B.p.Phone Service, officeOffice SuppliesElectric Service, B.P.Recording Deed, Maud E. Guess, et alPostage Stamps(Telegraphic Cost, Transferring Funds to( New York City(Funds to be transferred to Hew York( City

10.0010000100001000010000

333.34500.00200,00

200900

8,201.802,80

-7512.1240.003.001.295*507.507o509.8510.758.281.6014.001.253o501.57

163.03

Page 7: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

NO. ISSUED TO COVERING

(Funds to be transferred to New York City,498? Continental National Bank, (to pay bonds and interest coupons matur-

Fort Worth, Texas (ing" Sept. 15, 19564988 Barker Bros. Payment #8, Levee Improv. Section "A"4989 Barker Bros. Reconstructing Fence Oakwood Cemetery,)

Levee Improv. Section "A" )4990 Hawley and Freese Estimate $45, Engineering4991 Fort Worth Bluprint Co. Blue Prints, Area at YJest End Dam - E.M.

T O T A L

DISTRIBUTION OF VOUCHERS #1*958 TO $4991, INCLUSIVE

DirectorsLegalOfficeEngineeringEAGLE MOUNTAIN DM:Engineering & Supervision $100.00Phone Service 7°50Gasoline for TruckBlue Prints

BRIDGEPORT DAM:Engineering & Supervision • $100.00Phone Service 10075Electric Service 14«00Labor . 12080

Bonds Maturing Sept, 15, 1936Interest Coupons Maturing Sept. 15, 1936Expense Paying Bonds and Interest Coupons

LEVEE IMPROVEMENT:Section "A"Section "B11

T 0 T. A L

C O N D I T I O N O F F U N D S

CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION MAINTENANCEFUND" ACCOUNT FUND

BOOK BALANCE: August 10, 1936 $26,065*89 $ 3.3°°»26 $30,874-22RECEIPTS : Taxes, Penalty, etc. 118.81

Interest on Collector's D/B *02Interest on Bank D/B 8.15 6.78P.W.A. Grant Requisition #1 18,925*6?Land Rentals 110.00Miscellaneous 2.^0

$£6,074.04 $22,225<>93 $31,112.13DISBURSED:8/28/36 to 9A/36 Incl. by Vo.

$_\W*> to #&*7 Inclfl 819.00 280.00$26,07 .01; $21,406.93 ^30,832,13

DISBURSED:Bv Vo. #49S8 to &L991. Incl. 47-31 10,093.95 1. 566,711

BOOK BALANCE September 10, 1936 $26,026*73 $11,312.98 $29,365.39

AMuUNT

$207,282,50

10, 070^348.22

41.26c55

3218,990.50

$ 57«50833.34266.2541.26

io7o50 /5*50 /

7137.55

f59, ooo 0 oo

U.|.8,282o50164.60

10,091.1.1205i;

e2l8,990o50

INTEREST ANDSINKING KTND

$268,635*734,158»23

.8057.05

$272,851,8!

1272,851.81

207.282,5.0.

$ 65,569-31

Page 8: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

JOHN B. HAWLEY

S. W. FREESEM. C. NICHOLSH. A. HUNTER

COCOcry

INHIBIT "B" SEPTEMBER 11, 1956.3:00 P.M.

HAWLEY. FREESE AND NICHOLS.CONSULTING ENGINEERS

4O7-4IO CAPPS BUILDING

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

WATER PURIFICATION

SEWERAGESEWAGE TREATMENT

FLOOD CONTROL

APPRAISALS

Sept. 11, 1936

CL.1_Uc/o

Hon. C. A. Hickman, President,Tarrant County Water Control andImprovement District Number One,Fort Worth, Texas.

Dear Sir:

Barker Bros., general contractors, who havebeen improving the levees along the Clear Fork andWast Fork of the Trinity River upstream from PaddockViaduct have substantially completed the work coveredby their contract. A final inspection has been madeby the engineers and it is our recommendation thatthe job be accepted as substantially completed.

The only work not done strictly in accordancewith the specifications ia some of the Bermuda grasssodding and it is recommended that the sum of $82U.OObe retained from the payment now due the contractorpending the completion of this feature of the work.

Yours very truly,

HAWLEY, FRESSE and NICHOLS

Page 9: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

JOHN B. HAWLEY

S. W. FREESE

M. C. NICHOLSH. A. HUNTER

HAWLEY, FREESE AND NICHOLSCONSULTING ENGINEERS

4O7-4IO CAPPS BU1UDINGFORT WORTH. TEXAS

Sept. 8, 1936

WATEi^lPPLYWATER PURIFICATION

SEWERAGESEWAGE TREATMENT

FLOOD CONTROLAPPRAISALS

COCDCD

Board of"Directors,Tarrant County Water Control andImprovement District Number 1,Fort Worth, Texas.

Gentlemen:,

Pursuant to receiving written notice of completion fromBarker Bros., Contractors, dated August 29, 1936, a final'inspec-tion was made on September 1, 193 by S. W. Freese, J. K. Alewine,J. W. Lane, Contractor's Superintendent, E. H'. Conrad and J. E.James, Resident Engineer-Inspector, PVTA, of all the constructionwork done on the levee improvement project, PWA Docket No. 5$&4; ,belonging to the contract of .Barker Bros., Fort Worth, Texas,

This -is to certify that all the work belonging to theabove contract has been substantially completed according tothe Plans and Specifications and the provisions of the contract,with the following exception. At the time of completion .a por-tion of the Bermuda'grass sodding had not obtained'a satisfactorygrowth and it was recommended that ten percent (10$) of the itemfor Bermuda grass sodding, which ten percent was $8214..00, beretained until the grass had obtained satisfactory growth.

The work was completed within the time accorded by th&contract»

Yours very truly,

HAWLEY and FREESE, Engineers

Ap Alewine, Resident Engineer

"cc- Barker &ros, Contractorcc- E. H. Conrad

Page 10: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

BROS.

PWADQCKBT No* 5984. Texas.

STATS OF TEXAS. )) ss;

COUETY OF TARBAFP.)

Warrant County Water Control and Improvement District No» 1Fort Worth, Texas*

It is hereby certified that all bills against Barker Brothers for labor,

materials and services of every nature in connection with contract for

Levee Improvement, PISA Docket No. 5984, Texas, have been paid.

BARKER BROS,Employer

of Firm*

Sworn to and Subscribed to before roe this // day of v -*-&-'T^ 1956.

Hotary Pufelicf^ Warrant Co* Texas.

SML- ^

My Commission expires V/Oc^-^ -I I 7 3 /

Page 11: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

BARKBH BROS.

In Account with

Butcher and Sweeney.

Statement of isrorlc completed to date by Butcher & Sweeney,sub-contractors on Levee Improvement Project Bo. 5904:

Item V 100$ complete §3466*00Item 8 10$ complete -4642.00Item 9 100^ complete 4017.00Total chance orders 100 complete 499.22

Total work, all completed 12824.22

Less previous payments 11411•06

Balance due in full settlement 1413.16

Received payment in amount $1413.16 in full settlementof all emounts due us on our sub-contract on tho abovementioned project*

BUTCHER AIJD 377EEHDY,Sub-Contraotors.

Port ffortb, 0?exaa.September 10, 1926.

Page 12: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

JOHN B. HAWLEYS. W. FREESE WATER PURIFICATION

M. C. NICHOLS SEWERAGEH. A. HUNTER SEWAGE TREATMENT

FLOOD CONTROLAPPRAISALS

HAWLEY, FREESE AND NICHOLSCONSULTING ENGINEERS

4O7-41O CAPPS BU1UDINGFORT WORTH. TEXAS

Sept. k» 1936

Tarrant County WC&ID No. 1Levee ImprovementsFWA Docket No. 598)4.

Board of Directors,Tarrant County Water Control andImprovement District Number One,Fort Worth, Texas.

Gentlemen:

We hand you herewith Periodical Estimate forpartial payment Ko. 8 for work done by Barker Sros., contrac-tors on Levee Improvement project, FWA Docket No,

You will note that this project is substantiallycomplete and that this estimate is payment in full except theamount of $821;. 00, which amount represents 10$ of the item forBermuda grass sodding which was retained account of unsatis-factory condition at time of completion* The amount retainedis deemed to be adequate by the writer and Mr. Freese to pro-tect the Owner until a satisfactory condition of the grass isobtained.

Yours very truly,

HAWLEY and FREESE

Approved:

Page 13: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

Section 9 of the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935, reads as follows:

"Any person who knowingly and with intent to defraud the United States makes eny false statement in connection with any application for any project, employment, or relief aidunder the provisions of this joint resolution, or diverts, or attempts to divert, or assists in diverting for the benefit of any person or persons not entitled thereto, any moneys appro-priated by this joint resolution, or any services or real or personal property acquired thereunder, or who knowingly, by means of any fraud, force, threat, intimidation, or boycott,deprives any person of any of the benefits to which he may be entitled under the provisions of this joint resolution, or attempts so to do, or assists in so doing, shall be deemed guiltyof a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both."

n' a' eoi\Eum;z.'i i j imiHa oinct ic — i.-p

Section'35'of thef CriminaVCoderas amended7provides-a-penaltyof not'more than-$10;000-or imprisonment of-not-rnore-.than-lO-•nnwinerltj' anrt «fi1lfn11v mnlrincr nr fnncinor fn Hf> tnarlp " bmr folnp i-irJ-frmi nlanl- ntal-f'rnpnhB'' * i* * nr lisp nr cniiip tn TIP rnaI 7 ~^ f •"<-« * ^ j_^ — ,*!•-» , t «^r\* ^* x<r \i

for knowingly and willfully making or causing to be made "any.false orJfraudulent statements

•-both,

false-

or use or cause to be made or used

*—accountr claimrcertificaterarfidavitror'depositionrknowing the same to contain-any. fraudulent or fictitious statementI jftjafctr^jH ufOLcq- j t ajjomc_q- ! I —"—•-—~_ ~~

relating to any matter within the jurisdiction of any governmental department or agency."

e_CERTIEICATION_OF_THE_CONTRACTOR_OR_HIS DULY, AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

86

TOO

TCtT~

any

To the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that all items, units, quantities, and prices of work and material shown on the face of Sheets

of this Periodical Estimate are correct; that all work has been performed and materials supplied in full accordance w.ith the termsNos,

and conditions of the corresponding construction contract documents between

(Contractor's namaj

State Director; that the following is a true and correct

£aiW»t_Cc>._Jto^^ and

the

'statement of the contract account up to and including the last day of the period covered by

(Borrower's name) |

-r\__ i n IG^EK !., dated •**?»?_..•••..'.*...~*1?7* approved by the State Director, and all change orders app oved by

this estimate and that no part of the " total amount payable this estimate " has been received:

unit price contract[a) Total due based on the

'&) Total additions beyond

'(c) Total earned, original contract and additions

Total

•jcy^yw-iipafl1 ypnriey t-

scope of contract

^sum of a and b).

1849.22.

525.5690,374.78ftft

10J& of sodding retainedretained including this estimate, a/ . **.1.8^0*0^ °0nditi <»•

(e) Total due on account of original contract plus additions and minus retained percentage

(/) Total previously received (from last estimate}.

( Balance due this payment on contract and additions.

} Advance on materials stored this period

(/) Total amount payable this estimate

I further

Construction

Contractor

tf,i<Vf>0certify that all just and lawful bills against

aboa &JTTCJTexpendable equipment employed in the performance

Regulations.

Barker Bros.T-00 ;J

JJOof said contract have

Barker Bros.I (Contractor's name)

~\1*V'

824.00

89,550.78

79.480.44

10,070.34

0

.:/..

/

10,070.34

For labor,

been paid in full in accordance with * Paragraph 11,

Fort Worth, Texas,

material

12, P.

and

. A.

TitM i Superintendent"~9 * Date «_k,-,=3i-..-;Js-V O'* «5 WU

Sept. 2, 1956.

3<3EjmiJICATE OJNTHI? -BORROWER'S SUPERVISING ARCHITECT IN CHARGE ffCOlAnuti

I certify that I have verified ithis Periodical Estimate, and thattathe.bestbf my knowledge and belief it is a true and correcfstatemeiit of worko i '-^o'fir* i " nno oo i j ^"Mv uu 'K o o\u w 'fx i * - r' ~ iperformed and material supplied by the contractor, and that the contractor's certified statement of his account and the amount due him is correct

I I t I t ! ' !and just, and that all work and material included in this Periodical Estimate have been^performed and supplied in fulhaccordance witKithe terms

I •"* I (V*;f) i T(?O OO I W i\J»a «*> '(•*• °Jand conditions of the corresponding construction contract documents and change orders approved by the State Director.

Name

Title

' £9r.fc..Wo.r&u..!j;0 «fi

a

CERTIFICATE OF THE PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEER INSPECTOR IN CHARGE

0 T ''V*^ft * '1 0

TOO

TOO

TOO

TOOI certify that I have verified this Periodical-Estimate, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief it is a true and correct statement of work

performed and'Jmaterial supplied by the contractor, thatjl have in my possession satisfactory evidence of payment by the contractor of all just and

lawful bills-against'him'for labor, material, and'expendable equipment"employed"in the performance of his contract "in fuH'accordaiice with *Para-I T *"-*TC?T*"*£T ^?£IUJtIf J * USD C^^'THJiJfc; I T1^ T'fG ^U/IPr'-Q *"*nJT£?!'C^ ' f^SLJCXT ' TO CTITCC i

graph 11, 12, P. W. A. Construction Regulations, that all work and'material included ir^this Periodical Estimate have been inspected by' me or my

duly, authorized assistants and have been found to comply with the terms and conditions of the construction contract documents.and change^orders| U-Y«Tf-iriT.I T »™*-w*,» -.o_.j, ..l

approved by the State Director.VWOflHX oioacciA

NamebpAsicsf bCLccirf cQUJbjGfG'

place ____--___--_-LJ-_-£ojrt^War«i*...f Q*S TOO

Page 14: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

a

qnjAStst

bCL£

auq

auq

bCL£

XKJ;

COD

cxbc

FJJJ3

saq

LGJtf|

iOt]

--

t V v

ixOAGq pA

SJlt«fi»5No.

F T I * IS'

iLincq ouj CGHmX

2

3

e „_ ^

iV

5 'nef euq

ungr onI CCLfltA

7

8

\.ojj-VX^,

13

fLnCflOCT

uqspjG G

0.) x°f°

(c) x°fc

iBfinjofG

:ouqifiot

T

«- • - -T--^ v>

•A* C^^

*" '•'Unit price " "

B' M' V C0""**™-

"oaiTC ^

^ :0'°J25r^

3,466^00:

4.842,00 y

... ,017.00.

i.oo y

"vSlueeof0ltccLfi^X fpsf ajj In;

'UCC OU UJ3FGLJSI3 a

ice qnc tpis boirot

bLCAIOnOJA LCCGIAt

i qnc ou acconiif o$_

i ctoucq' OLiEmsj c

[ sqqif JOU3 pCAonq

qnc paccq ou fpc

tuq fp^f uo bptf 0^1

.: fp3f fpe JPJJOJAJU

*i}CGX B £ 6~8 *

a 01. fpc coiLC3l)ouq

01, fpi3 j^eiioqicfj,o (pc pc?f o(. uj A pnOMjeqE

Totals,

1

V '> v '\ "

G -- /-*-; _,^ t '

. — U1_

— \ \ ? *v

Total physical percent complete,

AMOUNTAC pccii ^oniiq fo couibjA «if(rp jrpc rctma euq couqifioua oj_ f JIB consfLncfiou couftacf qocmn

Detailed estimate

577226.S7 '

Ea4-;500ot)p

VN;- x^ ^'wtai^^fflsinv*pA ri*G£2iKi,?j:rc».t qu

6,000.00ppia j,It{oq;<.jj Ji3fiui3

,E (3,466.00iKKO

4,842.00.. ..

f IU fpG bGH.OLLU3UCGems upon whichC suq TSAAini niria ago

470.00

oicq fp;a bGijoq

nf ou coupiocp auq aq

5 (y.ouj jssp csfitusf e^

itiSjusj couf Lacf bjna t

;q lucjnqiuS fpis csfiu

)ufiacf auq oqqiqous

(_ nmf bucc coufLscf J

pc , , fOfOj auionuf bsX* 13 e fine suq cotLecf

UG COUBfLnCflOU COUfLi

[ £;3fiaibfG OLC COLLCCI3 auq pGjiGi' i ccifnX

98.466.37' ^(Jf^^ilJilCVilUW Uiii illil^ «J<

Total-— Change orders, ,

mS co GUA rosffci. amno fpclnLiaqicfjou O^SUA 6o/Materials stored, 'if all owed, ,

uoAunSrA suq MijjinjA ujajcruu OL ctmaniS f o pc zunitf 'n J&rand^total, ITTTIT m "„„„, „„ „,„'„,„„„, *,,„„

This estimate ' "

f$^ pOAG 1U LUX bO3BG33]

:G' suq fpSF (° flic Pr^C

568.66 y

208.30°^

19.88;f qocnuicuf a auq cpau!

[ f pUf fpG COUfiaCfOltB

Q

- ., 6-

0 ]3

O^ 33tq COUfLSCf paAG

no work was pe

qqipious nuq ruiung tGf s

??\0 fJUBU^IS^

XOv? ^^ OOQ^J

rt

ipje tpj3 GBFimsfc t( pasJF^f GDJGUf Ol_ f pG COUfL!

cf qocnujcuf 3 pcf MCGIT

I fpat all fllOLP P^s pcG^JSF SJI If WU3* ITUJF31 d/

2,036.84 VJ

l^lAB V C.iUU Uii HI26.34

CLUUJGUfSrqGb^CUf

^«asoe^.i8i5

icinqcq m f 'us KGuoqicTo date

1$ esfiatscfOLA CArqciic

31 UlX KUO/ATfifCSEUq P

1,320.00 v

VXIOM EHeillEEK

' 49,545.66 v

11,632.56. i

^ 6,371.40 vc oiqGLS obbiOAcq pA c;pgAG pcGi387 ..60sq i

G EM3r466«00^ "

, 4,842.00 A,

4,017.00 ;

;G 27.00 t

pcco bsiq m ton in (rf ormed :

(QOTIfLOtfOI.,!) UOIIig)

E. ptoa*

S*^TO"TC

>GCU LCCciAcq :

CF scconuf nb fo euq 11

f.cq pA fpc gfSfc DJ«

SJTtLcrxrp QO» ^o-|

i bcL^OLUicq auq njapeinufjficB1 suq bLiccs oj,

89,849.22 *»J miTA V11XUOBISI

525.56

^s^^^

JI EBTTUJIT£?i1TJAe OGGU•*" Unusted balance

: $ (. bSAlDGUF pi fpG CO

jfG^if J3 3 f-tnc Huq COt

X 0

-^ \4ui^"^"OLP &6K$£f* £Z

0'6,3F3f c DILCCF°i-'Jjq anbbjicq in ^Osccip--acconuF auq ^pc am

i^HIXECl IM ^HVl

/

^ o^ o

E»oi»f /io*^^p 3i€

ccoLqaucc »;Fp ^bSLt

""*" ™JO*t

* T0»(

MN

ea'E

n- g

ao't

•c]nqiuS Fpc jsgf qoX oj

cfoi' auq on cpau&e c

G^CI Qouf *fj IIEO*

rajs enbbjicq iu tnll 3C(

ftOL]c suq ujgf GLiaj spo/

^ 0

0

__^-^^/ „ Oi nBG OL CSrtSC .^ „! ^ . o

0.2 1 100Estimated monetarypercent completed-.

II0hGrff:qPeriod'

Perc«i(rftscfOL o:ccf ef3f e:

0HGE

1

1

0.3

iLqsuO ^muf qnc \

o0

3KT0"

Stnbp jj'

io-av0

AO-Wao-w

90 -48

S«'CO

Wi8S8-8G

Fpc bcuo

,qci.3 abb

OLqOUCG A

0.2E •

5

o nc moo..0.2 . ,

)/ UTQ 0!To date

9]J JflBf

/ntrp o(. J

100

100

100

100

100'c fruj 13 CO!

100 °i '

LOO

LOO—

LOO

LOO

13' b' A

\

^-

r-

\

^

^

A

1 COACLCf

3- J

ifp fpcf3CG 0(. 2]

100

100

» a•• 01 nacq100

UJA '

.OI p

LLJJ3

LGCf

' V

suq .

PA

onq

IUJ3

CGf3

e nOUA

U . S . G O V E R N M E N T P R 1 N T I N S 5FFICE 16 — *250qcic^iaoT. dig epqi pe pntfj uof mote fpcn £5'000 °i nubueoncq nor IBOLC (pnn j Xcai' ct potp-,,CUA bcinoii o\_ ODA o{. fpc p; ocjifa fo «pjcjj pc tucX p: cufjocq iroqci fpc biOAiqooa o^ fpia lonif icsoinfiou' OL otfe^jtifa co [a qo' OL czcijfii ID so qoiuC' apajj ,pc qccimq Gmjflv

fau-3j?cq pA rpia 1o:af LG^ojnisty' OL rn>. tci/jcca OL LCCTJ ox IiCLcoijai bLobctfA scdnrLcq fpcLcimqGL' OL /Apo [ruo/AiuQiX1 px mccua o^ BTJA (.lanq' IOLC&' rpxc^f lufiniiqapoij' OL poZcorf'miqci fjrr. bioAiajona o{, fpJ3 1°!U£ Lc~=;rr(iou' ot qjAdfa' 01 cftembfa fo qiACif1 OL osoisfo m qiAct-qaS fpL fp; pcnsgt o(, tmA bcLCou 01 bcuoira not cuqqcq cpcLc(X>' miX tuoueAB abbLO-

Apo puofliij^Ii cuq A'jfp mfcnf fo qcp-tmq fpc fjoircq gfcfica mopco c«3v ^ojss ifSfcujGup 10 comjccfjoa "-Jlfi CTIA obbjicofiou 101 OUA biolccf' nu&]o&uicoc' OL icfic^ ciq

ot fpc f oj, 1022' 03

Page 15: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

F. W. Form 1-23 Sheet ..A...- of __!_„ sheets.

Fo

Lo

Be

Co

£Of oj — cjiau^c otqcto'FEDERAL EMERG1

pcss qeqriC£;orr oi.qr.i.8' 1

Xor:T PERIODICAL tf , s L' r-. C

r t

sal

rrc

ie peric^ August lj

Fort Wo.

)wer's name and addres;

ntractor's name and addr

7

STIMATE FOR Pis

1936 to

rtht .„._ st

, Tarraut Count

District Ho.

Bar

For

ItemNo.

j-y-a

y — '*" ' -^

T-7-£

1jo-

6

6

7

8

9

13

Units or lump sum

SOC'ASAcre

Yd. sta.

uu* xu.

CM* Yd.

Acre

L. 3.

L. S.

L. 3.

Cu. Yd.

,

Detailed estimate

10

341,650

* 1,160,000

ov, rOUc

600

30

1

1

1

20

iNCY ADMINISTR

IRTIAL PAYMENTubstant'ially Cc

August 3I_, IS

ate Texas

y Water Control

1

ter Bros. ,

t Worth, Texas.-

\T1ON OF PUBLIC WORKS

NO. .-1-..., IIDCKET NO .ase*.nrplete .

*?o ( inclusive. Type of projec

Levee IraoroM

-«O5E?_PW««ttt Svmbol No.

ESTIMATED NUMBER OF UNITS (Quantity)

™.-^-W

00

3, 39S?

16ffi64j.pis caquroce

IVMOE OBD2ira

0

6.20

0

0

0.

0

)___

./• . ~, ^ __ . -

T-fi^a*

6oO 1

295,795 •t

930,605 v

J,o qsjc1

*

9

41,20 '

100 *

1CK$ "

ioojS ^

27 -

^rs axoHED

Contract No.

Estimated cost

Contract price,

Uncompleted U

0000

0/ fianaeq poioucc

0

- 0

^ 0

0

p0

0

1

•Texas*

'amenta

JEXflAfi '

6964

$

$ 98,4*

Estimatedpercent co

T.f*O

PerccTii0001

B^o,

0.3con

A-

15

0

0

0

0

/-v^

IGC

iisu

56.37

physicalmpleted

To 'date

TOO100TOO

100

io qas

100^\ctctjtrj bciccuf

100

100

100

100

100

>

—. •

Page 16: 3. - Tarrant Regional Water District · to the recommendation that $82^.00 be retained from the final estimate of the contractor as a fund to indemnify the District against failure

(Ti;,'

'*

12

a

8

ieu*

No.

1-A

1-A'HO

UflSCft

U.O/ACL

-. f ITG b

Total,

5.

-3

r* 3*

r" a*

r. j.

u« Ay

Additions

Veto204.72

26.34fiuipt en jirdb smn

1,3 U3UJG girq gqqt

2 USIUG guq uqqiGE

;uc

£0&* ^0

17JSSfla* "*'

„ pr-.525.56s r,IS.1- ( l - » i ! i i t 8 i ( : \ / u II

Less deduction orders,

J'

soI

T

I

ao

c:s -^

Deductions

yietrcoo$s^T'eso

TO

l*™««n»*

£OZ

BJJZ

j370£j*yo$. 3d^*

3 BIWOT* COmT<

Tase

r

2 n Of IF G-nt iv

tEDEBVP EWEKCTotal — Change orders,

TAEKS— MATEEI-•-*

0

0

0

0

e-so

iANGE ORDERS

This estimate

a'aoa000

XPP c;jg6v34

E3XIWVXED HflPIBE

f £|.05i|!p* £62Ctt3*

PeiBBOE-

T -

i iW« GQBfLO]

W £19X30

V-onaf 21 Tc

ramTHSraB

•MCA VDWIMiaiH

4.LS STORED

JOO^

100 ? '

vT*SO /

To date

$

sea *43a '294.50

e°o '204.72

*• '26.34

i o& ntuxs (ciii«B(j(x}i

S3J«T jniDjiOAGIS3J

cjy

nb jo^o •p/]j|- 525t56— " f

fjLion ot bnsnc

~ >

0

0

0

0

0

, V

A

Unused balance

V$

000

0

n— blcfcq 0

^OUfLHCf bUCG

.p gXiupoj pjo* — •

53"ABO"inffli£CH

J,A,fa6 O{_ bLO^GC

iH'j^I'f^fl PIlHl cO,Q«

MOWK8

0

0

0

0

T2

TOO

TOO

TOO

TOO

TOO

Estimated percentcompleted

(VQ 1 Tftf*

Period

.Percent

T000

fetLKUt

bl'00g^^°

*aef**

TOW

TJWV^-TTT*-.foUJvJ.-^.

•^rr?E5

To dat

i vftrcen

TOO100

TOO

100

•LOOatycccq

— —

:_

:e*SA

T2JT

- -

100

J -£"