3 d Toler Ancing

19
Since the 80s, with the introduc tion of CA D-CAM software, the need to clearly understand nominal specifications has been largely solved. Indeed, until this date, a nominal specification was made up of several 2D projected geometrical drawings whose consistency was uncertain. With the advent of 3D CAD-CAM, the specification becomes a “digital result” whose consistency is mathematically certified by the software! This has been a decisive benefit that explains the worldwide success of this technology. Although ambiguity of the nominal specification has all but disappeared, the technical difficulties and business conflicts are now more apparent due to the ambiguities of the differences between the nominal specification and the result. ASME and ISO tolerancing standards have as a result grown in importance and tremendously developed through the 80s and 90s. Nonetheless, they are still topics for research and development. The tolerance specification language issued from these standards allows downstream users to define the admissible limits of the dimensional defects as well as the shape, orientation and position defects of parts’ and assemblie s’ surf aces . This booklet provides a view on this language, exemplary both for its clarity and concis eness. It is an essential tool for the beginner as well as for the experienced technician. Professor Emeritus André Clément, CIRP member 2 FOREWORD FOREWORD Tolerance standardization on an international scale for technical objects can be defined with one word: interchan- geability . Modern times ha ve driven the neces sity to share technological machine features not only because of a failure, but primarily due to the systematic use of industrial suppliers to manufacture complex systems. T o get something manufactured, the client has to first “spec ify” their requests. The dimensional description of the mechanical part to manufacture is identified as the “nominal specification”, and the final actual manufactured object is called the “result”. The difference betw een the result and the nominal specification is a major s ource of co nflict. This difference needs also to be specified; giving rise to what is called the “tolerance specification”, combined with the nominal dimen- sional specification.  A specificatio n, whatever it may be, must be comprehensive, consistent and understandable without interpretation by both the client and supplier. 1 FOREWORD

Transcript of 3 d Toler Ancing

  • Since the 80s, with the introduction of CAD-CAMsoftware, the need to clearly understand nominalspecifications has been largely solved. Indeed, until thisdate, a nominal specification was made up of several 2Dprojected geometrical drawings whose consistency wasuncertain. With the advent of 3D CAD-CAM, thespecification becomes a digital result whose consistency ismathematically certified by the software! This has been adecisive benefit that explains the worldwide success of thistechnology. Although ambiguity of the nominal specificationhas all but disappeared, the technical difficulties andbusiness conflicts are now more apparent due to theambiguities of the differences between the nominalspecification and the result. ASME and ISO tolerancingstandards have as a result grown in importance andtremendously developed through the 80s and 90s.Nonetheless, they are still topics for research anddevelopment. The tolerance specification language issuedfrom these standards allows downstream users to define theadmissible limits of the dimensional defects as well as theshape, orientation and position defects of parts andassemblies surfaces.

    This booklet provides a view on this language,exemplary both for its clarity and conciseness. It is anessential tool for the beginner as well as for the experiencedtechnician.

    Professor Emeritus Andr Clment,CIRP member

    2FOREWORD

    FOREWORD

    Tolerance standardization on an international scalefor technical objects can be defined with one word: interchan-geability. Modern times have driven the necessity to sharetechnological machine features not only because of a failure,but primarily due to the systematic use of industrial suppliersto manufacture complex systems.

    To get something manufactured, the client has tofirst specify their requests. The dimensional description ofthe mechanical part to manufacture is identified as the nominalspecification, and the final actual manufactured object is calledthe result. The difference between the result and the nominalspecification is a major source of conflict. This differenceneeds also to be specified; giving rise to what is called thetolerance specification, combined with the nominal dimen-sional specification.

    A specification, whatever it may be, must becomprehensive, consistent and understandable withoutinterpretation by both the client and supplier.

    1 FOREWORD

  • 43 3D TOLERANCING IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT

    3D TOLERANCING IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT

    3D TOLERANCING IN PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT

    Customerrequirements

    Maintenance

    Functional,Logical and

    Physicaldesign

    ManufacturingQualitycontrol

    Automotive Aerospace Shipbuilding

    IndustrialEquipment High Tech

    ConsumerGoods

    LANGUAGE

    TOOLS

    METHOD

    3D Tolerancing is at the core of Product Lifecycle Management fromcustomer requirements to maintenance.

    3D Functional Tolerancing & Annotation is particularly useful in thefollowing industries.

    3D Functional Tolerancing & Annotation 3D FTA

  • 65 CONTENTS

    GLOSSARY p. 7

    DIMENSIONS p. 9

    TOLERANCED FEATURE p. 10

    DATUM AND DATUM FEATURE p. 11

    TOLERANCE ZONE p. 14

    GEOMETRIC TOLERANCES p. 15

    Form p. 15

    Profile p. 17

    Orientation p. 19

    Location p. 21

    Runout p. 25

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION p. 27

    TEST YOUR SKILLS! p. 38

    Type Characteristic Example Page

    Straightness

    15Circularity

    Flatness

    Cylindricity

    Profile of a line17

    Profile of a surface

    Parallelism

    19Perpendicularity

    Angularity

    Symmetry

    21Concentricity

    Position

    Circular Runout25

    Total Runout

    GEOMETRIC TOLERANCES

    GEOMETRIC TOLERANCES

    For

    mP

    rofil

    eO

    rient

    atio

    nLo

    catio

    nR

    unou

    t

    CONTENTS

  • 87

    TOLERANCE ZONE P. 14A portion of space defined by perfect geometry in which thetoleranced feature has to be included to comply with the geo-metric specification.

    MAXIMUM MATERIAL CONDITION (MMC) LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION (LMC) P. 27-32

    The condition in which a feature of size contains the maximum(respectively least) amount of material within the stated limitsof size; for example, minimum (respectively maximum) holediameter, maximum (respectively minimum) shaft diameter.

    VIRTUAL CONDITION P. 28, 29The envelope or boundary that corresponds to the collectiveeffects of a size features specified MMC or LMC materialcondition and the geometric tolerance for that material condition.

    GLOSSARY

    GLOSSARY

    TOLERANCED FEATURE P. 10An actual feature or a derived feature from an actual featureof a part which supports a geometric specification (size, form,profile, orientation, location, runout and roughness).

    DATUM FEATURE P. 11, 12An actual feature of a part (physical plane, physical hole,physical slot, etc ) which is used to establish a datum.

    DATUM P. 11-13 A theoretically perfect geometric feature (exact point, axis, orplane) derived from the true geometric counterpart of adatum feature. Datums are used as references from whichgeometric tolerances (position, profile, orientation, runout)are established.

    DATUM TARGET P. 11, 12 A point, a line or an area of an actual feature of the part whichis used to establish a datum.

    GLOSSARY

    M L

    The following definitions are based on ASME Y14.41-2003.

  • 109

    When the note n surfaces is mentioned, several surfacesare considered as a single interrupted or noncontinuous surface.The control is the same applied to a single plane surface.

    An actual feature or a derived feature from an actual featureof a part which supports a geometric specification (size, form,profile, orientation, location, runout and roughness).

    TOLERANCED FEATURES

    DIMENSIONS

    DIMENSIONS

    TOLERANCED FEATURE

    COPLANAR SURFACES

    Surface selection

    Axis selection

    Median plane selection

    Unless Perfect Form at MMC not required is mentioned, the limitsof size rule is applied. When only a size dimension is given:

    2 the size dimension at any cross section shall be within thesize tolerance,

    2 the surface(s) shall not extend beyond the perfect formdefined by the MMC size.

    DIMENSIONS

    49 ai 50

    ANGLE DIMENSIONS

    Toleranced Feature

    34.7 di 35.3

    Leg

    end

  • 1211 DATUM DATUM

    DATUM

    Datum Association Criteria

    Point

    Line

    Plane

    Plane:Complexsurface

    A theoretically perfect geometric feature (exact point, axis, or plane)derived from the true geometric counterpart of a datum feature.Datums are used as references from which geometric tolerances(position, profile, orientation, runout) are established.

    Single Datum

    Multiple Datum

    Datum Reference Frame

    Datum Target

    The datum triangle is placed on a featuresurface or on an extension line of the featureoutline. When the Datum Feature is the lineor surface itself, the triangle must be separatedfrom the dimension line.

    The datum triangle is placed on the extension of a dimension arrowwhen the datum feature is the axis or the median plane. The datumtriangle can replace a dimension arrow if there is not enough room.

    Center ofthe smallestcircumscribedsphere

    Center ofthe largestinscribedsphere

    Axis ofthe largest inscribedcylinder

    Axis ofthe smallest circumscribedcylinder

    Tangent plane closest to theactual surface / Least squaresplane / etc...

    Median plane of thelargest circumscribedparallel planes / etc...

    Datum feature Datum

    Lege

    nd

  • 1413 DATUM TOLERANCE ZONE

    TOLERANCE ZONE

    As seen in this example, the order in which the datums are placedin the tolerance frame is very important. On a functional perspective,these two ways of annotating are totally different.

    A portion of space defined by perfect geometry in which the tolerancedfeature has to be included to comply with the geometric specification.

    A geometric tolerance is expressed on the model by:2 an arrow indicating the toleranced feature,2 a tolerance frame containing the tolerancing characteristics.

    Here are some tolerance zones:

    Some tolerance zones are not fixed into space; they have the possibilityto move along different directions or rotate around several axes (DOF:Degree Of Freedom).This compass indicates which move is possible for each tolerance zone:

    DATUMCASE OF A SPECIFIED DATUM SYSTEM

    A B B ADIFFERENCE BETWEEN AND

    Datum plane A

    Actual surface A

    Datum Axis B

    Actualsurface B

    Freerotations

    Lockedtranslations

    Freetranslations

    Lockedrotations

  • 1615 FORM FORM

    FORM Toleranced Feature Tolerance Zone Legen

    d

    Straightness

    Circularity

    Flatness

    Cylindricity

  • 1817 PROFILE PROFILE

    PROFILE

    Profileof a line

    Profileof a surface

    Profileof a surface

    Toleranced Feature Datum feature Datum Tolerance Zone

    Leg

    end

  • 2019 ORIENTATION ORIENTATION

    ORIENTATION

    Parallelism

    Perpendicularity

    Perpendicularity

    Angularity

    Toleranced Feature Datum feature Datum Tolerance Zone

    Leg

    end

  • 2221 LOCATION LOCATION

    LOCATION

    Concentricity

    Symmetry

    Position

    Toleranced Feature Datum feature Datum Tolerance Zone

    Leg

    end

  • 2423 LOCATION LOCATION

    LOCATION

    Position

    Position:a composite

    tolerance

    0.2 A B

    0.1 A B

    0.2 A B

    0.1 A B

    x2

    x2

    Toleranced Feature Datum feature Datum Tolerance Zone

    Leg

    end

  • 2625 RUNOUT RUNOUT

    RUNOUT

    Circular runout

    Total runout

    AXIAL

    Toleranced Feature Datum feature Datum Tolerance Zone

    Leg

    end

    RADIAL

  • 2827 MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    CLASSIC TOLERANCING WITHOUT MMC

    Maximum and Least Material Condition are powerful tolerancingtools allowing the user to transcribe easily and rapidly some of thefunctional aspects of assembly parts. They are also of great valueduring conception, manufacturing and inspection stages.

    MMC is used to ensure interchangeability.

    This male part is rejected because it exceeds the specifications limits( L = 19.94 mm and = 0.23 mm ). However, it can still beassembled with conform female parts and it answers to the factor G 0.The tolerancing for this function isnt adapted.

    Is it possible to respect to the assembly function G 0 without over-constraining the parts geometry?

    It can indeed be done by respecting the virtual condition. The virtualcondition is the perfect geometric feature centered around the assemblyfunction binding complementary parts which must be put together:

    Gmin = (20 + 0.2) (20.5 - 0.3) = 0 mm

    Gmax = 20.6 - 19.9 = 0.7 mm

    part 1

    part 2

    In this example, part 1 and part 2 form a rigid joint.There is a functional condition (Gap) for the assembly: G 0

    M L

    M

    L

    0.20.23

    19.919.94

    20.0

    Tolerancingarea

  • 3029 MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    The male part is the only one dealtwith in this section; the process isthe same with the female one.

    It is possible to go on with this transfer by exclusively putting the tolerancevalue on the dimension and to reach tolerance zero with the geometrictolerance:

    20 and 0.2 20 and 0If the Maximum Material Condition is not dimensionally reached, it ispossible to transfer the margin (difference between the tolerance sizeand the actual size) on the geometric specification (and vice versa).The Maximum Material Condition must not be exceeded.

    Virtual Condition: The envelope or boundary that corresponds to thecollective effects of a size features specified MMC or LMC materialcondition and the geometric tolerance for that material condition.

    M L

    L

    0.2

    0.3

    19.9

    Tolerancingarea

    20.0

    Virtual L = Lmin - max = 20.5 - 0.3= 20.2

    Virtual L = Lmax + max= 20 + 0.2= 20.2

    L

    0.2

    0.3

    19.9

    Tolerancingarea

    20.0 20.2

    0

    -0.1

    +0.2

    -0.1

    TOLERANCING WITH MMC M TOLERANCING WITH MMC AT TOLERANCE ZERO M

  • 3231 MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    MAXIMUM AND LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    CONCLUSION OF MMC

    LEAST MATERIAL CONDITION

    The Least Material Condition is also used to facilitate the fabricationprocess. It can be used to maintain a critical wall thickness to avoidruptures or to guarantee a maximal value to a defect. This exigencyallows greater control of the precision of a mechanical guide

    (example: prismatic joint ensured by two complementary components)ensuring not to exceed the virtual state at least material. As seen in the diagram above with MMC, the concept of expandingthe range of acceptable components can also be applied for LMC.

    M

    M

    L

    L

    0.2

    0.3

    19.9

    Tolerancingarea

    20.0L

    0.2

    0.3

    19.9

    Tolerancingarea

    20.0 20.2L

    0.2

    19.9 20.0

    L

    Tolerancingarea

    Decrease cost

  • 3433 3D FUNCTIONAL TOLERANCING AND ANNOTATION

    3D FUNCTIONAL TOLERANCING AND ANNOTATION

    3D FUNCTIONAL TOLERANCING AND ANNOTATION

    CATIA 3D Functional Tolerancing and Annotation is a new-generationCATIA product addressing the easy definition and management oftolerance specifications and annotations of 3D parts and assemblies.

    FTA is fully compliant with the ASME Y14.41-2003 standard.

    The intuitive interface of CATIA 3D Functional Tolerancing andAnnotation product provides an ideal solution for new CATIA customersin small and medium size industries, looking to reduce reliance on 2Ddrawings and increase the use of 3D as the master definition.

    Define in the 3D model all what is used to be defined in a 2D drawing: 2 toleranced dimensions, datums, geometrical tolerances,2 roughness, partial surfaces, 2 notes, symbols, Enhance the quality of the product definition by removinginconsistencies between 3D definition and 2D Drawing definition.

    Validate the Dimensioning and Tolerancing specifications:2 assist the user in the correct definition of Dimensioning &

    Tolerancing specifications (Tolerancing Advisor capabilities).2 check the validity (according to ASME or ISO standards rules) of

    Dimensioning &Tolerancing specifications: for all the geometric modifications, for all the tolerancing scheme modifications.

    Enhance the quality of the product definition by checkingfull compliance to ASME or ISO standards.

    FTA

  • 3635 DELMIA

    3D FTA - CATIA 3D FTA - DELMIA

    CATIA

    REUSE OF FTA BY DOWNSTREAM APPLICATIONS

    METROLOG V5

    MACHINING

    TOLERANCING

    ASSISTANT

    DELMIA can read and re-use FTA information in different workbenchesas in: 2 DELMIA Machinining Tolerancing Assistant (MTT): MTT is anadd-on product to DPM Machining Process Planner that will allowmanufacturing process planner to create in-process manufacturingtolerances on the unique in-process model generated from DPMMachining. MTT is a tolerance stack-up analysis tool that will enableplanners to analyze the stack-up distribution with respect to the FTAdefined tolerances. 2 Metrologic Inspection: FTA tolerances can also be reused in theoff-line & on-line inspection application developed by DELMIA partnersMetrologic. Metrologic software is native to V5 & reads all FTA definedtolerances & automatically creates an inspection plan.

    Manufacturing,Assembly Process

    Planning

    Tolerance Analysis(Manufacturing

    context)

    Inspection

    Assembly Design(Functional

    Requirements)

    Part Design(Functional

    Specifications)

    FunctionalToleranceAnalysis

    (Design context)

    FTA

  • 37 CERTIFICATION

    About VirtoolsAcquired by Dassault Systmes in mid-2005, Virtools is the leading provider of comprehensive software solutions for buildinghighly interactive 3D life-like applications. Virtools 3D real-time technologies and solutions are used in a wide variety ofapplications such as simulation of product usage, ergonomic testing, creating the shopping experience, training scenarios,right through to branding, advertising and web marketing applications. For more information, visit www.virtools.com

    About Dassault Systmes As a world leader in 3D and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) solutions, Dassault Systmes brings value to more than100,000 customers in 80 countries. A pioneer in the 3D software market since 1981, Dassault Systmes develops andmarkets PLM application software and services that support industrial processes and provide a 3D vision of the entire lifecycleof products from conception to maintenance. The Dassault Systmes portfolio consists of CATIA for designing the virtualproduct - SolidWorks for 3D mechanical design - DELMIA for virtual production - SIMULIA for virtual testing and ENOVIAfor global collaborative lifecycle management, including ENOVIA VPLM, ENOVIA MatrixOne and ENOVIA SmarTeam.Dassault Systmes is listed on the Nasdaq (DASTY) and Euronext Paris (#13065, DSY.PA) stock exchanges. For moreinformation, visit http://www.3ds.com

    Trademarks CATIA, DELMIA, ENOVIA, SIMULIA and SolidWorks are registered trademarks of Dassault Systmes or its subsidiaries inthe US and/or other countries.

    ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Defined For Professionals2 The Dassault Systmes Professional Certification gives to engineering

    users the expertise level wanted by industry market needs.2 CATIA Certification is the valuable distinction deployed like a professional

    curriculum by employers working in most high-tech industries of the world.

    Adopted By Teachers & Researchers2 The CATIA Certification is a tangible benefit for any academic participant

    to build credibility within the industry market and bridges the gap betweenacademia and industry.

    2 Expand your Universitys influence by becoming a Dassault SystmesAcademic Certification Partner and provide opportunities for students tobecome CATIA certified professionals.

    A Differentiator For Students2 In various engineering domains, Dassault Systmes Professional

    Certification is one of the best assets to promote your professional skills.2 Dassault Systmes Professional Certification increases your student chances

    to acquire the brightest jobs of the future.

    Dassault Systmes CertificationShow Them What You know

    http://www.3ds.com/education/certification/