2

CONTENTS

CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 2

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3

1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 5

2. BRIEF NOTES ON THE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 6

3. CHANGES, EVALUATIONS AND AUDITS ................................................................................................. 8

4. PROGRESS BY AGIR THEME IN 2015 ..................................................................................................... 8

5. GOOD DONORSHIP PRINCIPLES .......................................................................................................... 18

6. FINANCIAL REPORT [NOTES AND EXPLANATIONS] ............................................................................. 21

a. Financial Performance.................................................................................................................... 21

b. Expenditure Structure .................................................................................................................... 21

7. CONCLUSIONS AND CHALLENGES ....................................................................................................... 23

7.1. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 23

72. Challenges ......................................................................................................................................... 23

8. ANNEXES: ............................................................................................................................................ 24

8.1. Financial Report .......................................................................................................................... 24

8.2. RISK ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................. 28

8.3. OVERARCHING RESULTS FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 32

8.4. CSO´S CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................ 79

8.5. CRONOGRAMA DE ACTIVIDADES DAS IPOs (IBIS, DIAKONIA, OXFAM E WE)] PARA 2015 ......... 88

8.6. LIST OF POS AND FUNDS TO POS IN 2015 .................................................................................. 96

3

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AAAJC Associação de Assistência e Apoio Jurídico às Comunidades

ACABE Associação Criança Boa Esperança

ACAMO Associação dos Cegos e Amblíopes de Moçambique

ACDH Associação Centro de Direitos Humanos

ADE Apoio Directo às Escolas

ADECRU Associação Académica para o Desenvolvimento das Comunidades Rurais

ADEMUM Associação para o Desenvolvimento das Mulheres de Murrua

AGIR Action for Inclusive and Responsible Governance

AMCS Associação da Mulher na Comunicação Social

AMME Associação Moçambicana das Mulheres na Educação

AMODEFA Associação Moçambicana para o Desenvolvimento da Família

AMUDEIA Associação das Mulheres Desfavorecidas da Açucareira da Manhiça

AMMCJ Associação das Mulheres Moçambicanas de Carreira Jurídica

AMPCM Associação Moçambicana de Promoção de Cooperativismo Moderno

AMUDZA Associação das Mulheres Domésticas da Zambézia

AWEPA African Western European Parliamentarians with Africa

CAICC Centro de Apoio à Informação e Comunicação Comunitária

CB Capacity Building

CBO Community Based Organizations

CEC Centro de Estudos Interdisciplinares de Comunicação

CEDE Centro de Estudos de Democracia e Desenvolvimento

CESAB Centro de Estudos Sociais Aquino de Bragança

CIP Centro de Integridade Pública

CO Country Office (Mozambique)

CODD Centro de Estudos e Promoção da Cidadania, Meio Ambiente e Direitos Humanos

CRM Complaints and Response Mechanism

CS Civil Society

CSO Civil Society Organization

CSR Corporate Social Responsibility

DB Duty Bearer

DECOM Associação de Defesa do Consumidor

EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

EoS Embassy of Sweden

FM Fórum Mulher

FRELIMO Frente de Libertação de Moçambique

FORCOM Fórum Nacional das Rádios Comunitárias

GDI Instituto para a Democracia e Governação

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GMD Grupo Moçambicano da Dívida

HAP Humanitarian Accountability Partnership

HO Head Office

4

HOPEM Homens pela Mudança

IESE Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Económicos

IPO Intermediary Partner Organization

INGO International Non-Governmental Organization

IPCC Community Consultative and Participation Institutions

KUKUMBI Associação de Desenvolvimento Rural

LDH Liga dos Direitos Humanos

MDM Mozambican Democratic Movement

MEAL Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning

MGD Millennium Development Goals

MISA Media Institute of Southern Africa

MULEIDE Associação Mulher, Lei e Desenvolvimento

NAFEZA Núcleo das Associações Feministas da Zambézia

NANA Núcleo dos Amigos da Natureza e Meio Ambiente

NCCAMS National Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy

NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

OAM Ordem dos Advogados de Moçambique

OE / EO Observatório Eleitoral/Electoral Observatory

PSCM-PS Plataforma da Sociedade Civil para a Protecção Social

PNDH Pressão Nacional para Direitos Humanos

PFM Public Finance Management

PROPAZ Associação Instituto para a Promoção da Paz

RBA Rights Based Approach

RBM Results Based Management

RECAC Rede de Comunicadores Amigos da Criança

REDE CAME Rede Contra o Abuso de Menores

RENAMO Resistência Nacional de Moçambique

RENSIDA Rede Nacional de Associações de Pessoas vivendo com HIV&SIDA

RH Right Holder

RO Regional Office

RSHR Sexual Reproductive and Health Rights

RUTH Rede Uthende

SA Sociedade Aberta

SE Swedish Embassy

SEKELEKANI Centro de Estudos de Comunicação para o Desenvolvimento

STAE Secretariado Técnico de Administração Eleitoral

ToC Theory of Change

WLSA Women and Law in Southern Africa

YP (PJ) Youth Parliament /Parlamento Juvenil

5

1. INTRODUCTION This is the 2015 AGIR II Overarching Report (Narrative and Financial), presenting and analyzing the main

activities implemented during the year under review, and also briefly stating the results achieved by the

AGIR Programme – coordinated by four INGOs, namely Diakonia, IBIS, Oxfam and We Effect,

denominated Intermediary Partner Organizations (IPOs) – through its implementing partner

organizations (POs).

The second phase of AGIR, or AGIR II, has been designed to last for six years (2015-2020); the six-year

period is divided in two parts: the first one (2015-2017) and the second one (2018-2020). Structurally,

the Results Framework has been designed to consider reflective reporting in terms of results by the end

of each of the two aforementioned periods, with very precise qualitative and quantitative indicators to

measure progress, having as reference the baseline done at the start of the programme (1st January

2015).

As a logical consequence of the reporting structure, and bearing in mind that AGIR is a democratic

governance and human rights programme, in 2015 and 2017, the first two years of the first period; and

in 2018 and 2019, the first two years of the second period; the annual report has, thus, to adopt a

progress description and/or discussion perspective, i.e., by – methodologically speaking – provision of

elements (progress markers) showing what is being done towards the intermediary (31st December

2017) and final (31st December 2020) end-lines. A comparatively more profound description of activities

undertaken in 2015 [the same will apply in 2016, 2018 and 2019], will be found in the disaggregated

reports of the four Sub-programmes of AGIR.

Up to its end, in 2020, AGIR envisages: “A Mozambican society where its citizens, particularly also

women and other presently marginalized groups, fully enjoy their rights to social inclusion and gender

equity, to retribution of wealth created from the country’s patrimony, to accessible and affordable public

services of good quality, to basic civil freedoms and to political representation and participation; in a

peaceful and ecologically sustainable environment”.

The change building process is synthetized in an overarching Theory of Change, which has two

components: (a) a theory on how partner organizations’ capacity can be enhanced to increase their

effectiveness and relevance as civil society organizations who aim to impact on the different duty

bearers, in the five thematic fields1; and (b) a theory on how the partner organization can actually bring

about such structural and sustainable change on the rights situation. The first theory is in essence a

theory about organizational and institutional development. The second one is fundamentally a theory

about social change dynamics.

1 Right to Inclusion and Equality; Right to Retribution of Wealth Created from the Country’s Patrimony; Right to Accessible and Affordable Public Services of Good Quality; Right to Basic Civic Freedoms; and Right to Political Representation and Participation.

6

This report comprises seven sections, the first one being the introduction. Section two is reserved for

brief notes on the context, with special focus on the enabling and disabling environment and on the

democratic environment as such. Section three is a synthetic presentation of main changes, evaluations

and audits occurred and/or realized during the year under review. Section four contains notes on

progress in each of the six AGIR themes (five strictly programmatic and one on CSO´s capacity

development). Section five is on how AGIR dealt with good donorship underlying principles in 2015.

Section six is dedicated to financial reporting. Section seven is on conclusions (mainly on whether the

programme´s' relevance has been confirmed on its first year of the second phase, including core

achievements).

2. BRIEF NOTES ON THE CONTEXT This section summarily describes how the foreseen context for the year under review was in terms of

actual dynamics. The basis for this is the context analysis considered in the AGIR II Overarching

Proposal.

At an overarching level, AGIR identified, for its six year duration (2015-2020), two dimensions of

contextually relevant aspects: (i) enabling and disabling environment; and (ii) democratic environment.

For the year under review (2015), both dimensions did impact at AGIR at large, mainly at the country

level, as the following situations do substantiate:

▪ Enabling domain: (i) The inauguration address by President Filipe Nyusi, by the beginning of the

year, in which he did emphasize the need for all (citizens, unions, civil society, political parties,

etc.) to participate in the governance process, followed by another one during the swearing in

ceremony of his cabinet members (ministers), may have functioned as a call for openness: most

probably, that explains the reasons for many cases the establishment of MoU with duty bearers

was, in 2015, easier than in the previous years; (ii) The approval, by the Government, of the

Right to Information by-law was a very positive news for the environment under which AGIR

operates. Actually, effective legal framework for access to information is of great relevance for a

governance and human rights initiative such as AGIR programme. Nevertheless, the late

approval of the by-law (December 2015) turns it impossible to account on the fulfillment of its

norms and principles by relevant duty bearers;

▪ Disabling domain: (i) The worsening of the political and military stand-off between the

Government and Renamo, the main opposition party, eventually happened to be the most

serious threat to the environment in which AGIR is meant to operate; (ii) Cases of clear attack to

critics (individual and CSO´s, as well as any other kind of dissent), in social media platforms and

on media historically close to the Government, may have caused fears within rights-holders and

CSO´s in terms of holding the Government accountable in burning and sensitive issues.

Consequently, both the IPO´s and the PO´s felt a sort of scaling up government´s control and

scrutiny over PO´s and IPOs´ work. This somehow contrasts with what the incumbent President

7

said during his swearing in, leading to readings related to the probably existence of more than

one ‘power centers’.

The coexistence of enabling and disabling factors showed that actions undertaken by rights-holders

through AGIR PO´s, on one hand, and the receipt and/or reaction of duty bearers (over which change is

supposed to happen, before the societal degree of change), on the other hand, rely on a sort of love-

hate environment. Formally, the democratic environment was friendly to civil society’s work, but the

bad receipt of criticism, mainly directed to the Government, whose party is in a majority position at the

National Parliament2, suggested that collaboration and/or partnership with CSO´s is maybe motivated by

a strategic positioning rather than by a matter of conviction.

The quasi-war lasting from 2013 and which worsened by second quarter of 2015 affected some AGIR

planned actions (e.g. 1. Trainings which were meant to be done by CAICC in Gorongosa, Sofala

provinceProvince, ended-up being postponed; 2. Field visits to Buzi and Nhamatamba in Sofala (with

Wadzafica and PNDH) were not realized due to fearing of armed conflict)., mainly in the provinces of

Sofala, Manica, Tete and Zambézia; about 11 thousand Mozambicans fled to neighboring Malawi,

receiving support from ACNUR; this occurred in an economic recession situation (positive economic

growth, but below the expectations), as for the first time in the last 15 years economic growth was of

just approximately 5%. International crisis in commodity markets affected the extractive sector, with

some companies withdrawing investment plans (Vale in Tete and Mozal in Maputo, for example) or

giving-up to their presence in the country (Rio Tinto in Tete, for example). Food insecurity increased:

floods in central and northern Mozambique and droughts in the south caused devastation in cattle

population, which originated internal migrations and resulted in deaths caused by hunger.

The outlook for 2016 suggests that the socio-economic situation may become even worse: after

disclosure, in international media, of a secret loan in the beginning of 2015 (Mozambique tuna scandal,

amounting to USD 850 million - EMATUM), another three hidden debts, contracted without the

mandatory approval from the Parliament, have been revealed by the beginning of 2016: Proindicus (a

company linked to security services) with more than USD 800 million; Nacala Naval Base with USD 550

million; and a loan of 130 to 200 million USD, apparently channeled to the Home Affairs Ministry, for

unknown purposes. The exposé was done by international media and the immediate effect was the IMF

freeze of funds which were to be disbursed to Mozambique by mid-April under the IMF bailout for

Mozambique; IMF’s position was, then, followed by the US Government, DFID, Canada and traditional

Mozambican Programme Support Partners, formerly known as G-19 but now comprising the 14 partners

that support the State Budget.

As the cost of living is constantly increasing, leading to a wide peoples’ frustration, as witnessed by

media reports, social unrest may occur any time and calls for demonstrations, initially led by anonymous

entities, and then by some political parties (Partido Ecologista, PIMO and PT) and CSO´s (Fórum Mulher,

2 In 64 parliaments [one national one; 10 provincial ones; and 53 local/municipal assemblies] in Mozambique, Frelimo, the party in Government, has got an absolute majority in 57 of them.

8

LDH, IESE, HOPEM, GMD, WLSA, etc.) are being made since mid of April, but only one (led by CSO´s)

happened (18th June, 2016), after several threats by anonymous people apparently linked to the

intelligentsia. . The Metical, the local currency, is facing huge depreciation to both the United States

Dollar (USD) and the South African Rand (ZAR), and, as a consequence, the country is witnessing a

spiraling increase in prices. Prices of public transportation and bread have not yet increased but only

due to a political management of the situation – probably not sustainable for long: media is already

reporting on closure of some bakeries in the suburbs of Maputo.

3. CHANGES, EVALUATIONS AND AUDITS This section describes what was done in 2015 within the AGIR Programme (focus on PO´s); highlight is

placed on relevant changes, evaluations and audits. A connection to the following year (2016) is also

briefly stated.

A holistic AGIR Partners Satisfaction Survey, conducted by external persons (individual or companies),

was supposed to have been conducted (initiated and concluded) in 2015, but that did not happen, as the

process ended-up beginning just by the end of the year under review, as IPO´s spent much more time

discussing the approach to be adopted, plus what they were expected to do, as individual organizations,

in line with their systems or orientations from their head offices3.

The four IPO´s carried out external and independent audits, under which specific recommendations (e.g.

absence or problematic procurement, payment authorizations by staff not entitled to, lack of proper

accounting software and insufficient asset registers.) were drafted. In some cases, the seriousness of the

recommendation obliged the IPO´s, based on relevant contractual arrangements, to request funds back

from two PO´s (LDH and CEDE).

Although the four IPO´s had unqualified audit reports, each IPO does include, on its individual annual

report, programme cases both at their (IPO) and/or PO levels that describe what needs to be addressed

in 2016. Overall, the most frequent cases highlighted in the IPO´s recommendations are as follows: i)

weak documentation systems; ii) delayed disbursements; and iii) quality and quantity of monitoring

visits (including follow up of findings).

4. PROGRESS BY AGIR THEME IN 2015 This section does consider an analytical account of progress in the five AGIR themes, plus what was

the situation in terms of CSO´s capacity development (which is theme six for AGIR).

For all the AGIR below mentioned themes, the final outcome is: “The emergence of an active, strong and

vibrant civil society in Mozambique, who legitimately raise and channel the voice of the female and male 3 The task was commissioned to the consultancy firm Keystone Accountability, which is to end the work during the first quarter of 2016. Relevant report for be considered in the overarching AGIR II report for 2016 (by beginning of 2017).

9

rights-holders who are at present being politically, socially and economically marginalized, secure their

access to all information they need to exercise their civic rights, and effectively participating in and

influencing of the course of policy decision-making process and accountability of the duty bearers for a

transparent, democratic, inclusive, gender just and human rights sensitive governance”4.

After mentioning which IPO´s are working/contributing in/to a specific theme and stating correspondent

Long-term Objectives (LO), attention will be given to analytical notes on the progress in 2015.

Methodologically, the succinct analysis will adopt the progress markers approach, as the intention is to

briefly describe what is being developed so that the target set for the end of the first three years of AGIR

(by 31st December 2017) can be seen as being progressively met.

Theme 1: Right to Inclusion and Equality

In this AGIR Theme, three of the four IPO´s are active: namely Oxfam – LO´s 2 and 3 -; We Effect - LO 2-

and Diakonia - LO 1-

Notes on the Progress in 2015:

According to 2015 Annual Report from some PO´s under Diakonia Sub-programme there was an increase on public resources allocation for improved universal access to key public services (justice, education, health, SRHR and social services) by the most vulnerable groups in 2015. About 63.5% of the state budget (3, 4 thousand million Dollars) were allocated to the social and economic sectors against 2.7 thousand million Dollars in 2014 (52. 7%) representing an increase of budget allocation to social and economic sector of about 10.8%. The education sector has received 1,248 million Dollars, corresponding to 22, 8% of the total budget expenditure, against 1,035 million Dollars in 2014 (19.8% of the total budget). The health sector has received 561, 5 million Dollars (10.2% of the total budget), representing an increase of 1, 1% against 477, 6 million Dollars in 2014, when the expenditure attained 9.1%5. Regarding budget allocation that would contribute to more access to justice and social protection, the scenario from the 2015 budget was as described below. Total budget allocated for the judicial system was of 3, 525.6 million Mozambique’s Metical (MZM) in 2014, which is equivalent to 1.9% of the total budget. In 2015, the budget allocated was of 4,001.7 million MZM, equivalent to 2.0 % of the total state budget for that year. For social protection and labour, the proposition of state budget allocated was 6,509.7 million MZM, equivalent to 3.5% of the total budget in 2014. In 2015 there was an increase of 0.1% (3.55) in the total State budget amount allocated, equal to 7,087.5 million MZM. Although there was a small increase, resource allocations for the most vulnerable groups were scarce6.

4 AGIR II Overarching Proposal, 5th Version 5 Orçamento do Estado de Moçambique cresce em 2015 para 6315 milhões de dólares, 2016, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/pt/category/noticias/, 22/03/16, 12:15:00 6 Previsão das Despesas nas Áreas de Protecção Social De forma a prosseguir com a implementação da Estratégia de Protecção Social Básica que tem como objectivo mitigar o impacto do custo de vida da população mais

10

Considering that the most vulnerable groups are more concentrated at provinceProvince and district levels, the 2015 State budget has reduced the percentage of budget allocated centrally from 69% to 59.8% increase over the provincial budget (from 17.8% to 23.2%), district (from 11.8% to 23.2%) and municipalities (from 1.4% to 1.6%).this scenario meant that there was more money to be allocated to those allocation decisions. However, the above mentioned positive changes, verified in 2015, that are in line with what AGIR has set as the Sub-programme expected outcomes for this theme, cannot be attributed to actions undertaken in 2015 by PO´s, but as an aggregation of the work that has been done in previous years. A set of public policies, laws and by-laws/regulations creating an enabling framework/ environment for a broader social inclusion, of the most vulnerable rights holders, have been approved or reviewed by relevant duty bearer’s (Parliament/National Assembly). Some examples:

✓ Approval of the National Strategy for Prevention and Struggle to Premature Marriage in Mozambique (in December 2015);

✓ Approval of the new National HIV and AIDS Response Strategy (PEN V); ✓ Approval of the revised penal code that removed ambiguous legal aspects that threatened the

realization of human rights of the sexual minorities and incorporated articles that decriminalize the abortion;

✓ Approval of a State Budget [for 2015] considering some of the suggestion channels by some CSO´s [CIP, CEC, IESE, GMD, through the Fórum de Monitoria Orçamental (FMO)] to the Parliamentary Commission of Plan and Budget.

In 2015, part of the Sub-programme partners, together with their constituency and represented groups, “…have brought the inclusion agenda into the public policy making and decision debate on key services (access to education, health, SRHR, access to justice and political participation) at different levels ( district, province, municipality and national levels)”. The main focus of inclusion was around:

✓ Social, political and economic Inclusion of people with blindness with special focus on access to education, health, justice and other public and private services (e.g. bank credit);

✓ Children inclusion in debate on issues that affect their lives (trough mechanisms like child parliament etc.) and access to basic public series trough more budget allocation to children social protection;

Over the reporting period, OXFAM PO´s referred that the number of women that have reported to have

suffered from gender based violence increased in 5%, from 15,628 in January 2015 to 16,372, in

December 2015, according to some partners’ (AMME, WLSA, FM, NAFEZA, HOPEM, Lambda, PNDH,

Nweti) 2015 Annual Reports. It is important to highlight that on the one hand the increase of people

that reported having suffered from GBV might be seen as a concern due to increase of wave of violence.

But on the other side, and considering the expected outcome, the increase of people that report having

suffered from GBV is a result of the work performed by CSO´s on sensitizing GBV survivors to report

abuse. Additionally, 128 districts provided SRHR services, with 35 health units implementing initiatives

desfavorecida, está previsto o montante de 3.522,3 milhões de MT, onde o número de beneficiários passará dos 439.144 previstos em 2014 para cerca de 475.097, em 2015, um aumento nominal de 8,2%.

11

aimed at humanizing health services. Furthermore, specific legal frameworks related to promotion of

rights of marginalized groups were approved, including the revision of the HIV and AIDS National

Strategy (PENIV) and the approval of the Penal Code. Both documents include provisions aimed at

protecting the rights of marginalized groups such as LGBT, children, women, the disabled and PLWHA.

We Effect: On what regards CSO´s and rights holders successfully influencing formulation and

implementation of policies on promoting equitable rural growth and right to food, it is important to

mention that partners such as AMPCM, AENA, OMR, ORAM, UNAC and UPCT, were involved in lobby

and advocacy activities aiming to influence formulation and implementation of policies relating to food

rights. Proposals concerning related tax regimes and participation in consultations regarding the rural

development and food security strategies and plans for reduction of chronic malnutrition are just some

examples of activities carried out in 2015. Several processes in which the partners have participated

have resulted in an approved document in 2015. Although partners might not fully agree with the

contents of these documents, the fact that they are consulted and participating is a good step towards

successful influence over the formulation process. However, it is more challenging to receive approval

on proposals and influence implementation. As this is a long-term outcome, continuous effort will be

made to fully reach this outcome at a further stage of Programme implementation.

Theme 2: Right to Retribution of Wealth Created from the Country’s Patrimony

In this AGIR Theme, three of the four IPO´s are active, namely Oxfam (LO 4); IBIS (LO 1) and We Effect (LO 1). The main achievements are as follows:

Notes on the Progress in 2015:

IBIS and Oxfam: The recent data (2015) provided by Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) 6th

annual report shows that the contribution from the country´s patrimony in extractive sector (mining and hydrocarbon area) [excluding capital gains] in the State budget was only 2.65%. This contribution is very low, when compared to other figures that report that the extractives sector was responsible for 30% national exporting, with about, 17.6% dominated by coal, 8.2% for natural gas and 4.2% for heavy sands. However, when we make a connection within areas with natural resources abundance, we realize that the poverty indexes, calculated by household (Survey Family Budged IOF2014/015) are far from achieving the indicator (42%), and the average poverty index is around 45% in those areas.

Figures presented above on the contribution of the extractive industry are in line with the debate

around extractive industry in 2015, through which it became consensual among key players of the sector

that the reality about the revenues from the extractive industry is, by far, below the higher expectations

on the extractive industry prospects.

We Effect: Almost all the PO´s under NACE Sub-programme were, during the year under review,

involved in lobby and advocacy actions relating to land rights and natural resources. As part of that,

more than 30 processes, of which 7 position papers, 15 seminars and workshops and 8 demonstrations

were carried out in 2015 with common involvement of PO´s and rights holders. The civil society is strong

12

and vibrant in regard to these issues and is successful in its role as a watchdog to the government. PO´s

reports describe various examples of positive decisions and measures taken by the Government

considering CSO´s recommendations (e.g. The launch by MITADER of the Project “Terra Segura”, were

5 million DUAT´s should be given to communities by 2019; the agreement on revising the Prosavana

Master Plan, the revision of resettlements processes in areas with mining, gas, and natural resources

investments, etc.). However, this is a difficult area of change with many challenges in terms of political

will from the private sector and the government itself. In short, the level and variety of involvement

from the civil society is highly satisfactory, but the effect it has on the fulfillment of rights is still

somewhat limited. This area hence continues to be an area in need of support and advocacy action, to

strive towards the fulfillment of the long-term outcome within the provided timeframe.

Theme 3: Right to Accessible and Affordable Public Services of Good Quality

In this AGIR Theme, the four AGIR IPOs are active, in these terms: Oxfam (LO 1); IBIS (LO 3); We Effect

(LO 3) and Diakonia (LO 4).

Notes on the Progress in 2015:

Diakonia: there is a remarkable increase of public resources (% of the total state budget) allocated for

improved universal access to key public services (justice, education, health, SRHR, and social services) by

the most vulnerable groups. The state budget of 2015 indicates that there was an increase of budget

allocated for the improvement of key public and basic services as mentioned in theme rights of inclusion

and equality.

“Increased recognition, by the duty bearers (the elected and the professional civil servants), on the

demands made, by rights holders, for the need for improved state performance in the provision of public

services quality (access to education, health, SRHR, justice, social services) in Mozambique”. However,

the recognition required still remains discursive and few material measures have been taken by the duty

bearers to increase government performance in providing services.

IBIS: In 2015, initial work towards the achievement of the enjoyment of the right to accessible and

affordable public services of good quality was initiated. The various activities that aimed at

disseminating the RTIL among female and male rights-holders, duty bearers and civil society

organizations and, introduction of ICT´s to right-holders, female and male members of the

(sub)committees, were the highlights of 2015 in pursuit of the right in question. Initial signs of

improvement in the performance of the subcommittees (education) that benefited from training, were

already visible in 2015, as such committees started meeting more regularly for planning and managed to

create different task forces to operationalize their role to monitor the use, for example, of Apoio Directo

às Escolas ADE funds and inform communities, with Zambézia (Mocuba, Alto-Molócuè and Quelimane)

being the province in which that was witnessed in monitoring visits

13

Actions that looked at increasing collaboration between CSO´s and local government bodies such as:

signing of MoU´s7 and, joint organization of relevant initiatives between CSO´s [mapping of schools and

health units for the purposes of monitoring and coverage and quality of services, by Solidariedade (a PO

based in Nampula) and District Directorate of Education and Health, in Moma, Larde, Nacala Porto and

the Nampula city municipality, all in Nampula province] and local government institution, were also

reported in 2015 in selected provinces and districts. The dissemination of RTIL was always a present

aspect in both initiatives.

We Effect: Rights holders (women and men) are empowered to advocate for, influence, monitor the

implementation of, and hold duty bearers accountable for measures that secure a safe and healthy

environment and promote resilience to climate change impacts.

AGIR partner organizations are involved in various advocacy and monitoring actions. These included

participation of PO´s in international and national events such as COP21, held in November 2015 in

Paris. Several partners (ABIODES; JA; LIVANINGO) were involved in the preparatory work for COP21

together with MITADER to formulate a Mozambican position during the conference. JA! and LIVANINGO

participated in the conference and were part of a global civil society march to promote specific climate

actions and climate justice and also participated in several workshops, giving voice to Mozambique’s

problems and position on climate change. The involvement of rights holders in this area is still subject

to improvement. Climate change and environmental issues are fairly complex and abstract issues that

challenge the involvement of rights holders in the advocacy process. Therefore, partners are also on

large-scale raising awareness and conducting trainings, to increase the understanding of how these

areas affect rights holders in their everyday life and therefore demands action.

Theme 4: Right to Basic Civic Freedoms

In this AGIR Theme, one of the four AGIR IPOs (IBIS) is active: IBIS on its LO 4

Notes on Progress in 2015:

IBIS: The main expected result at this point (media associations and rights holders role as change agents strengthened) is related to reduction of cases of ethical violation by the media houses (Public and Independent) and adherence to the Journalists Code of Conduct8. Another aspect is freedom of expression, press freedom and diversity and RTI guaranteed in law and adhered to by duty bearers in practice.

7 Through IBIS as IPO but for the benefit of all its PO´s, MoU´s were concluded with duty bearers like the provincial governments of Zambézia and Nampula; the municipalities of Quelimane, Mocuba and Alto-Molócuè (Zambézia); Nampula (Nampula province); Pemba (Cabo Delgado province); and, at large, with all the other municipalities through the National Municipalities Union (ANAM). 8 The one approved in 2011, as self-regulatory instrument, by the Mozambican Union of Journalists (SNJ), following a suggestion presented in a conference, during the same year, in Maputo, by the Swedish Press Ombudsman, highlighting the advantages of that (self-regulation), when compared to regulation from Government or Parliament.

14

A research funded by AGIR through AICE/IBIS Sub-programme on cases of ethical violations in the

media, was carried out in 2015 by CEC under its lead Communication´s Watch. The research found that

in general journalists and editors are aware of the standard ethical values/principles applicable to their

duties, but they end-up not materially adhering to them as a result of economic interests, with the

pursuit of profit being one of those cases. AGIR will take into account these issues in 2016 for advocacy

in order to mitigate/modify the status quo. Additionally, the World Journalism Index by Reporters

without Borders Report 2016 (but reporting the year 2015) reveals that Mozambique dropped two

degrees on the World Press Freedom. The country is now positioned 87 out of 180 countries in global

ranking.

To mitigate/modify the issues above, three public media houses (Radio Mozambique, TVM and ICS) and

three independent media houses (SOICO, Miramar and TIM) and 12 community radios from Gurue,

Maganja da Costa, Ile, Alto Molócué, Chinde, Namarroi, Nicoadala , Morrumbala, Namacurra and

Pebane were trained during2015 on Self-Regulation and Ethical Journalism. The training was carried out

by AICE Sub-programme. CEC and CAICC).

During an International Conference on Social Communication held in 2015, under the auspices of CEC

and SEKELEKANI, the media houses that attended the conference Televisão de Moçambique (TVM),

Radio Mozambique (RM), SOICO Media Group (STV, O País and SFM), Mira-Mar Television, Televisão

Independente de Moçambique (TIM), Instituto de Comunicação Social (ICS), which owns some of local

radio stations] made a commitment to change the current scenario. In a corporate way, for example,

MISA-Mozambique compromised itself to develop, in 2016, in partnership with the Mozambican Union

of Journalists (SNJ), efforts aimed at improving the 2011 Mozambican Journalists Code of Conduct, and,

thus, safeguard the watchdog role of the media.

In what refers to freedom of expression and press freedom, the 2015 World Press Freedom Index by

Reporters Without Borders (released in the first quarter of 2016) reveals that Mozambique dropped two

positions on the world press freedom, which is (according to the same source) due to self-censorship

and assassination of a journalist in 2015. Now, Mozambique is in position 87 out of 180 countries. The

legal environment as such did have a positive change, thanks to the approval of the RTI by-law.

Theme 5: Right to Political Representation and Participation

In this AGIR Theme, two of the four AGIR IPO´s (IBIS and Diakonia) are active: IBIS: LO 2 and Diakonia: LO

2.

Notes on Progress in 2015:

Diakonia: One of the expected outcomes within this theme is: “The process and results of the elections are transparent, reliable, complying with international electoral standards (e.g. SADC electoral principles and guidelines and IDEA)”.

15

This expected long term outcome is still to be realized. Next elections are expected to happen only in 2018. Meanwhile, the Electoral Observatory has started, in 2015, a consultation work towards the development of position paper and political/legislative proposal for the review of the electoral framework and addition of new contributions from civil society in order to, at bridging outcome level, contribute to a reform, on the present framework, that would make sure that “a broadly accepted (legal and institutional) electoral framework, by the main political actors (political parties and civil society organizations) has been established. The Public policy development process is politically and socially inclusive and participatory; There is some openness from government institutions for the participation and engagement of civil society organizations on the services delivering (e.g. education, health, SRHR) public policy development and implementation process. This participation tends to be institutionalized in consultative and participations forums such as:

✓ CNAC (National Council for the Advance of Child Rights) phased out in 2015 and substituted by a broader council- CNAS;

✓ Development Observatories.

The new participatory mechanism reported to 2015 was: ✓ CNAS (National Council of Social Action) has been established in 2015 and is an aggregation of

different councils (child advancement council, women advancement council, elderly advancement council etc.). Partner CSO´s working on child rights (ACAMO, Rede da Criança and Rede came) do claim that the decision of merging all these councils in one was not participative and reduced the number of representation of civil society organization in the consultative forum. To exemplify, Rede da Criança reported that in CNAS child rights organizations used to be represented by 7 organizations but in the CNAS framework the number has been cut to only two representations. The reported change was decided in the Council of Ministers based on the cost-efficiency argument that there were many different Councils dealing with different vulnerable groups within the same Ministry (CNAM- Conselho Nacional do Avanço da Mulher, Conselho Nacional do Avanço da Criança and the one dealing with elderly and disabled).

There are positive reports from partners indicating “duty bearers have included rights holder’s claims and concerns regarding inclusive access to justice, political participation, education, health, SRHR, social services, into the policy and governance agenda”. Some evidences are given in the annex matrix and in the text above regarding new policy and legal frameworks in debate or approved by the parliaments such as:

✓ The approval of national strategy against premature marriages; ✓ The debate on inclusive and rehabilitative education for people with disabilities.

IBIS: Regarding the right for political representation and participation, IBIS found that 2015 was

essentially a period to create the conditions to provide the members of parliament at various levels

(national, provincial and municipal), as well as civil society organizations, with solid knowledge regarding

the Right to Information Law. Therefore, in order to achieve that objective, the main activities carried

out were the training on the content of the RTIL and how can citizens and parliamentarians use it as a

16

mean to foster political participation was one of the key activities in 2015. The trainings were mainly

undertaken by AICE Sub-programme partners (ACDH, GDI, OAM, SEKELEKANI and Solidariedade

Moçambique). As these actions are still in an initial stage, it is expected that during 2016, members of

the assemblies at the various levels will use the knowledge gained to develop more informed

interventions, using as support the RTIL.

17

Notes on ‘Right to Accessible and Affordable SRH Public Service of Good Quality’1 Government actions for an improved service delivering of, an inclusive (women and men, young and adults), sexual and reproductive health care have improved. Regarding government improved actions, taken for a better and inclusive SRH service delivery in 2015, the

main changes reported were at policy and legislation levels1. New strategies and policies were put in place as reported above. No substantial evidences were found/reported indicating any meaningful change on governmental performance to better deliver services at different levels (province, district). “Improved and inclusive SRH service delivering has been placed in the priority of the public policy agenda on health services delivering”. The new approved strategy for family planning with a reference method on women and girls at the community and sanitary units represents a sign that inclusion of women and girls at the community level in regard to SRH service is being put in the public policy priority. This strategy

implies the allocation of more resources to SRH at the communities’ levels. “Government performance (national and provincial levels) in protecting and promoting people’s (vulnerable

children, women, disabled people and those living with HIV and AIDS) right to sexual and reproductive

health has improved”. The Government continued implementing the integrated protocol for assistance of

women and girls who have been victims of sexual harassment and domestic violence. The implementation

is being done under the “Multissectorial Mechanism for Integrated Assistance for Women, Victim of

Violence and the referring Manual. This has been a reference documents used by partners (MULEIDE,

AMMC) when assisting women seeking for assistance for having been effective or potential victims of

violence (MULEIDE is running a host house for women victims of domestic violence in Manhiça, Maputo).

In 2015, the implementation of the protocol has been done in partnership with CSO´s (Among them

MULEIDE, AMMCJ, and the main outcome was the provision of capacity building trainings to the technical

personnel from the health sector. The focus of the trainings was on the functionality of the mentioned

protocol. With reference to the Provincial Health Department in Niassa, 2015, the implementation of the

protocol has also resulted in the expansion of health technicians providing psychiatric assistance to the

victims of sexual harassment and violence in that province.

Two relevant policy change occurred with the partners contribution: PENIV (HIV and AIDS National

Strategy), that include provision on better and quality SRHR services and the National Strategy for

Prevention from and Fight Against Early Marriage. Regarding the promotion of human rights of sexual

minorities in Mozambique, the Ministry of Health included specific needs for sexual minorities in the list of

essential drugs and medical consumables, which are also distributed by the Health Sector Supply Chain to

national, provincial and district health facilities. The production and realization of the campaign "Different

but Equal" had an ever expected repercussion as very high levels of membership were achieved over the

year in every corner of the country. The campaign was disseminated in various media, with a greater focus

on radio, television and the internet. This was used as support to promote greater interaction between

LGBT organizations, the community and the general public that is interested in the cause of Lambda, thus

allowing more people to be involved in the campaign.

Regarding the promotion of SRHR among citizens, one of the AICE Sub-programme PO´s (GDI) sent about

375.000 SMS´s to citizens located in Nampula city and Nacala-Porto. The objective was to increase

awareness on issues like the conditions under which abortion is permitted by law. Though not linked with

SRHR, this partner used this campaign to alert citizens that the worker is not obliged to inform his HIV

status and on the importance of respecting fundamental rights (life in this case) and avoiding the

discrimination/trafficking of albinos.

CACHA

18

5. GOOD DONORSHIP PRINCIPLES This section contains notes on how AGIR IPO´s applied the good donorship principles in 2015, based on

the two most recent and relevant aid effectiveness instruments, namely The Busan Partnership for

Effective Development Cooperation (2011) and Istanbul CSO Development Effectiveness Principles

(2010), both held as references in the Embassy of Sweden Operational Guidelines for Partnering with

and Supporting Civil Society in Mozambique. All the actions are based in the HRBA (Human Rights

Based Approach).

As per The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, four shared principles are meant

to guide the work of AGIR, namely (i) ownership, (ii) focus on results; (iii) partnerships; and (iv)

transparency and shared responsibility. In what refers to 2015, AGIR worked in line with those good

donorship values is synthetized in the following lines:

Ownership: In 2015, AGIR IPO´s did renew Partnership Agreements with almost all PO´s (exceptions:

Magariro, CEMO and CESAB) which transited from AGIR I to AGIR II based on their own core-business

and priorities, as per their statutes, strategic plan and policies. The same applied to those which joined

AGIR for the first time in 2015 (Solidariedade Moçambique, Gender Links, etc.). The PO´s of AGIR are

funded, as a generally rule, via the core-funding modality. In some cases (CODD, AMCS, MISA-

Mozambique, AWEPA, CEDE), where PO´s still face some organizational and/or internal governance

challenges, funding may be year-marked, but towards core-funding modality, which is the main funding

approach of AGIR. For PO´s which are not core PO´s of AGIR, but which can contribute to achievement of

results, another funding windows, concretely small/nursery funds does exist.

Focus on Results: AGIR IPO´s did agree, with all their PO´s, to focus their intervention on results, not on

activities or mere objectives. In all the monitoring visits undertaken by IPO´s in 2015, the issue of results

documentation and monitoring was always part of the discussions. So, Results Based Management

(RBM) is ab initio agreed by the parts. AGIR IPO´s provide trainings, in various forms (classic ones, tailor-

made and/or in the job training), which do also cover the RBM. Challenges are still there, as some PO´s

are demonstrating weaknesses in migrating from management by activities to RBM, but 2015 PO´s

reports showed an overall progress in working with RBM.

Partnerships [for Developments]: For the achievement of expected results, AGIR establishes

partnerships with Mozambican CSO´s/PO´s, as collective change agents targeting, in their interventions,

individual change agents or rights-holders. Considering that development relies on various actors, AGIR

also works with relevant duty bearers (parliaments and government departments, for example), with

which it firms strategic partnerships (Memorandums of Understanding). Table on joint activities

specifically list some examples of this partnerships. In the partnerships, AGIR does place particular

respect to the principle of equality (donors or their representatives and/or intermediaries and PO´s have

to have horizontal relations), to the principle of mutual accountability (AGIR reports to its PO´s and this

also report to AGIR), to the principle of predictability (via the establishment of multi-annual partnership

19

agreements), except (for the latter principle) in the situation in which their organizational and/or

internal issues to sort out.

Transparency and Shared Responsibility: The principle of transparency is agreed, by AGIR IPO´s and

implementing partners (PO´s), to be an omnipresent reality, meaning that every action within the

partnership has to have transparency as part of it. For example, the IPO´s did share with the PO´s all the

relevant programmatic information (programme document/proposals, detailed budgets, baselines, anti-

corruption policies, gender policies, etc.), as to allow an unrestricted access to information related to

AGIR9. During the partnership, all the parts share responsibilities, even in the cases in which a given

partner fails to achieve the desired results. Permanent and systematic accompaniment of this is made

possible via monitoring and evaluation exercises.

To keep impetus on the aid development agenda, as one of the recommendations of the Paris

Declaration (2005) and Accra Agenda for Action (2008) assessment in 2011, in 2015 AGIR interventions,

through local PO´s, did consider, as widely as possible:

▪ The use of results frameworks, which means that every operational plan established is supposed

to be based in a matrix in which different levels of results are presented (outputs, outcomes and

impacts), with an clear baseline, indicators (qualitative and/or quantitative), plus means of

verification, as to enable change measurement;

▪ Untie aid is adhered to by AGIR as much as possible, but, considering that there are still

significant challenges when it comes to funds channeled for activities [attained to results] and

those channeled to administration (salaries included), a 30-70 rule (30% of funds for

administration and 70% for activities, including, in the latter, 15% for capacity development via

the PO per se) was introduced in 2015, mostly based in the lessons learnt from AGIR I (2010-

2014).

As said in the introduction to this section, all the actions and interventions are drafted and implemented

rigorously inspired in the Human Rights Based Approach (HRBA), mainly on its five core principles,

namely participation; accountability; empowerment of rights-holders; legality of rights; and non-

discrimination and equality, the latter being strategically privileged, given the historically disadvantage

that women, girls, LGBT and other marginalized groups do experiment in Mozambique.

To ensure that partners understand in the same way what HRBA entails in the AGIR context, AGIR IPO´s

considered, in various ways, the matter with PO´s: that included bilateral talks, mainly during monitoring

visits; tailor-made trainings; discussions within the annual meetings between the IPO´s and PO´s; classic

trainings to PO´s on the matter (AICE Sub-programme, for example), etc. As to showcase what in

particular AGIR achieved in 2015 in what refers to the HRBA principle of non-discrimination and quality,

below are provided notes on mainstreaming of gender, HIV and AIDS and climate change:

9 The establishment of website (for AGIR) was also planned for 2015, as part of the transparency promotion, but that ended-up being delayed. Once finished, in 2016, all the programmatic information (including programmatic and audit report) will be published, for access by everyone).

20

For 2015, the joint activities planned in the area of gender and HIV/AIDS were: (i) health fair; (ii) training

in gender and HIV/AIDS; (iii) gender group technical meetings; and (iv) training on the fair resources

allocation system (FRAS). Those main joint activities were performed as below:

The health fair took place in Quelimane, following AGIR partner´s forum which allowed the participation

of AGIR partners as well as local CBO´s and the citizens of Quelimane. The objective was promoting

styles of sexual life and reproductive health for women and men and sexual minorities .The main

activities that took place in the fair were a march which started at Valentine Garden until Chirangano

field, where gymnastics activities took pace. During the fair, about 280 people benefited from blood

pressure tests, 78 people made HIV testing, 98 women benefited from different contraceptives for

family planning, and 80 people benefited from oral health education. All the participants on the fair

(approximately 600) were exposed to materials related to sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR)

and domestic violence. Three plays on matters related with SRHR were performed by children from the

local Primary School that works with AGIR PO´s. 2016 AGIR PO´s Forum will associate this fair to other

events which aim at strengthening active citizenship of citizens taking into account the rights and duties.

This fair will have the participation of other public institutions like Ministério da Administraçãoo Estatal

e Função Pública, Autoridade Tributária, etc.

Training in gender and HIV has not been implemented in accordance with the previously established for

two main reasons: i) the late implementation of joint activities as a result of the late start of

implementation of AGIR II. The closure of AGIR I have proven to be slower than envisioned. Therefore,

the four IPO´s decided not to carry out common trainings and alternatively they provided “tailor-made

training” to partners, specific attention was given to the new AGIR partners.

The Organization of training on the Fair Resources Allocation System was coordinated by We Effect,

since their regional office has experience in implementing this model. The training itself has not yet

taken place but We Effect held a preparatory meeting attended by programme and finance officers of

the four IPOs where they discussed the concept and operationalization of the FRAS methodology. Due to

the agenda of We Effect regional staff, this activity was postponed to the first quarter of 2016.

Gender group technical meetings took place as planned (one per trimester) and they were an important

moment for experience sharing among AGIR partners and delimitation of new strategies to improve

IPO´s role on helping PO´s mainstream gender.

The outputs of the activities carried out are: Some AGIR partners showed proof of understand gender

mainstreaming and improved their capacity of undertaking gender analysis in their strategic (ACDH and

OAM) and operational documents (ACDH, GDI, OAM, SEKELEKANI); partners developed draft gender

policies and action plans that were approved on their general assemblies; Some PO´s (OAM and

Solidariedade Moçambique)developed draft policies that are still to be submitted to their members

(Annual Generals Meetings), to be discussed and, most probably, to be approved.

Main challenges faced in 2015 were: (i) the continuous staff mobility within the partners and the

precarious knowledge management systems among their organizations lead to a situation where the

IPO´s need to be constantly training on the same issues; (ii) Despite the effort that has been made in

21

terms of bringing the executive staff and social organs to gender trainings, in some organizations still

there is disparity on what regards their attendance to the trainings and their commitment to gender

equality. Gender mainstreaming continues to be an issue that is taken care by executives of the PO´s;

(iii) In some cases, PO´s efforts to mainstreaming gender into their programs and organizational culture

still remain a matter of compliance to a donor requirement than a commitment with gender equality

and women’ rights (e.g. CODD). To tackle this identified challenge, in 2016, more emphasis will be

placed in usage of methodologies (GAL) that value increasing individual awareness and commitment to

gender equality and women’ rights as an important factor to achieve sustainable and lasting change in

PO´s organization culture and programming.

6. FINANCIAL REPORT [NOTES AND EXPLANATIONS]

a. Financial Performance

In 2015 AGIR donnors have disbursed around SEK 202,530,032.11 to IPO´s. The expenditures incurred in

the same period were SEK 149,591,983.84, which represents 74% of the total disbursed funds. The final

balance to be forwarded to 2016 were SEK 52,938,048, or 26% of the disbursed funds.

The total budget approved from AGIR donnors for the 4 IPO´s in 2015 were SEK 180,528,422. The total

funds available were SEK 202.530.032 which represent 112% of the approved budget . The reason why

the available funds were higher compared to the approved funds is because OXFAM has put own funds

into AGIR Programme.

b. Expenditure Structure

The structure of the expenditure shows that the total funds transfered to local organizations represent

75% of the total expenditure incurred in 2015, where 72% of funds were disbursed to PO´s and 3% of

funds were used in Other Mechanisms of Funding budget line.

The budgetline linked to tehcnical support to PO´s, IPO Lead Activities and Monitoring&Evaluation,

represents 4% of total expenditures of 2015.

The budgetline related to managament of the Programme, Programme Support Costs, Flat Rate for

Indirect Costs e Programme Staff Costs, represents 20% of total expenditures of 2015. So 80% of

expenditures of 2015 were allocated to PO´s and local organizations as funds transferred and tecnhical

support services delivered.

22

Funds Transfer to Partners,

112,450,611, 75%

IPO Lead Activities, 4,016,424.60, 3%

AGIR Joint Activities,

1,214,319, 1%

Monitoring and Evaluation ,

2,107,230, 1%

Programme Staff Costs, 13,304,945,

9% Programme Support Costs, 5,642,532,

4%

Flat Rate for Indirect Costs ,

10,855,922.75, 7%

c. Budget Performance

AGIR Programme has met the target fixed for 2015 since 90% of funds planned to PO´s were transferred.

The execution on Other Mechanisms of Funding budgetline were 28% of planned funds. The low level of

performance in this budgetline was due to the procceess of advertisement, evaluation and selection of

proposals being longer.

The performance on the budgetline related to IPO´s Lead Activities and Monitoring and Evaluation was

respectively 59% and 56% of the planned funds. The reasons that explain this low level of performance

are linked to AGIR I (2010 - 2014) phasing out and the needed arrangements to start implementing AGIR

II (2015-2020).

We need to pay a particular attention to Programme Support Costs budgetline where the execution was

106%. Well that shows that some IPO´s still need to address adjustmens on their costs structure,

specially on office costs.

Description Budget Expenditure %

(1) (2) (3)=(2) / (1)

Funds Transfer to Key Partners 119,625,109 107,800,079 90%

Other Mechanisms of Funding 16,421,550 4,650,531 28%

IPO Lead Activities 6,802,946 4,016,425 59%

AGIR Joint Activities 2,785,160 1,214,319 44%

Monitoring and Evaluation 3,760,019 2,107,230 56%

Programme Team Costs 14,331,757 13,304,945 93%

23

Programme Support Costs 5,299,415 5,642,532 106%

Flat Rate for Indirect Costs 11,502,467 10,855,923 94%

Total 180,528,422 149,591,984 83%

7. CONCLUSIONS AND CHALLENGES

7.1 Conclusions Being this the first year of implementation of AGIR II and also due to a short programme

inception period, 2015 performance has suffered many constraints that impacted in the ability

to fulfill some of the set targets (outputs). Nevertheless, what was accomplished will contribute

to bring about the changes that AGIR Programme pursues.

7.2 Challenges • The ongoing armed conflict has contributed to shrinking of civil space work in the country,

mainly as a result of increasing lack of trust in political arena. The once earned collaboration and

space by CSO´s was greatly reduced due to political and military clashes between Government

and Renamo as Government institutions became even more suspicious of CSO’s actions,

especially advocacy-related ones. The conflict also affected the extent to which partners were

able to fulfill their work plans as some PO´s are based/or have activities in province directly hit

by the conflict;

• The devaluation of the local currency (Meticais) vis-a-vis USD has affected initial agreed budgets

and the recent information that has been shared by Government indicates that the devaluation

can continue;

• There is still high partners´ dependence on AGIR funding. More information on partners

dependency on AGIR funding can be seen in annex 1;

• Deficient access to information (mostly from key sectors) limited collection and collation of

relevant data for the programme planning and reporting;

• The delay in establishment of a joint capacity building technical group affected realization of

joint activities.

24

8. ANNEXES:

8.1. Financial Report

AGIR - ACÇÕES PARA UMA GOVERNAÇÃO INCLUSIVA E RESPONSÁVEL

Consolidated Income and Expenditure Statement

Period: January – December

Year: 2015

Currency: SEK

DESCRIPTION 2015 %

1. Funds Received 202,530,032.11

1.1 Diakonia 54,617,400.00

1.2 IBIS-Moçambique 40,000,000.00

1.3 Oxfam Novib 76,265,632.11

1.4 We Effect 31,647,000.00

2. Effective Expenditures (January - December 2015) 149,591,983.84

74%

2.1 Diakonia 33,871,163.00 17%

2.2 IBIS-Moçambique 28,688,518.35 14%

2.3 Oxfam Novib 65,315,808.26 32%

2.4 We Effect 21,716,494.23 11%

3. Excess of receipt under expenditures (1-2) 52,938,048 26%

3.1 Diakonia 20,746,237.00

3.2 IBIS-Moçambique 11,311,481.65

3.3 Oxfam Novib 10,949,823.85

3.4 We Effect 9,930,505.77

25

AGIR - ACÇÕES PARA UMA GOVERNAÇÃO INCLUSIVA E RESPONSÁVEL

CURRENCY: SEK

PERIOD: January - December 2015

CONSOLIDATED BUDGET MONITORING

Category DESCRIPTION Budget Diakonia IBIS OXFAM WE EFFECT TOTAL Balance % Notes

Funds Transfer to Partners

KEY PARTNERS

KEY PARTNERS 119,625,109 20,137,483 18,866,989

52,717,344 16,078,262 107,800,079

11,825,030 90%

SUB - TOTAL OF KEY PARTNERS 119,625,109 20,137,483 18,866,989

52,717,344 16,078,262 107,800,079

11,825,030 90%

OTHER MECHANISM OF FUNDING

c) Small Funding 9,078,091 2,017,809 414,665 - 660,763 3,093,237 5,984,854 34%

d) Innovative Funding 4,150,908 - 577,996 - - 577,996 3,572,912 14%

e) Agile Funding 3,192,551 - 970,348 - 8,951 979,299 2,213,253 31%

SUB-TOTAL- OTHER MECHANISM OF FUNDING

16,421,550 2,017,809 1,963,008 - 669,714 4,650,531 11,771,018 28%

TOTAL KEY PARTNERS PLUS OTHER MECHANISM FUNDING

136,046,659 22,155,292 20,829,998

52,717,344 16,747,976 112,450,611

23,596,048 83%

IPO Lead Activities

Other Programme Costs

Base-line Study 966,445 449,131 202,928 210,195 862,254 104,191 89%

Civil Society Study and Surveys 515,575 - 437,547 14,520 452,067 63,508 88%

Midterm evaluation - - - - - -

Partners assessment 510,812 7,500 116,306 2,054 125,861 384,952 25%

Capacity building programmes 3,582,253 123,939 170,664 1,452,148 9,453 1,756,205 1,826,048 49%

Thematic training 894,408 125,470 438,488 1,784 565,742 328,665 63%

Programme communications 210,503 47,800 116,827 21,727 18,219 204,572 5,931 97% N1

Coordination and networking activities 122,950 34,150 15,573 - 49,723 73,227 40%

Sub-total Other programme costs 6,802,946 338,859 1,306,990 2,118,189 252,387 4,016,425 2,786,521 59%

26

AGIR Joint Programme Costs

AGIR Joint Activities

Template Design 20,662 - - - 20,662 0%

Joint Capacity Building 398,470 600 57,760 38,435 96,794 301,676 24%

Partner Satisfaction Test 276,336 - - - - 276,336 0%

Consultative Forum 257,992 427,716 51,714 374,632 854,061 (596,069) 331% N2

Communication and newsletter printing 388,215 33,750 94,654 61,206 7,543 197,153 191,062 51%

Joint Studies 478,469 - 60,790 60,790 417,679 13%

Joint MEAL specialist 376,826 - - - 376,826 0%

Joint communication specialist 376,826 - - - 376,826 0%

Seminaries Workshops and exchange visits 170,774 - 3,532 1,988 5,520 165,254 3%

Laptops and furniture for specialists 40,589 - - - 40,589 0%

Sub-total Joint programme costs 2,785,160 462,066 204,127 538,595 9,531 1,214,319 1,570,841 44%

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation costs

Programme Audit 823,756 118,741 - 474,065 192,888 785,694 38,062 95%

Partner Forum and M and E partner workshops

1,114,992 57,560 157,059 228,559 328,139 771,317 343,676 69%

Critical friends 332,068 10,019 - - 10,019 322,049 3%

Partner satisfaction Survey 254,425 5,400 - - 5,400 249,025 2%

National travel 974,607 31,495 102,131 201,351 65,988 400,965 573,642 41%

International travel 154,758 60,000 56,102 - 17,733 133,835 20,923 86%

Head office program coordination 91,187 - - - 91,187 0%

Head office controller support 14,225 - - - 14,225 0%

Sub-total Monitoring and Evaluation 3,760,019 283,215 315,292 903,975 604,748 2,107,230 1,652,789 56%

TOTAL IPO ACTIVITY, JOINT ACTIVITY AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION

13,348,125 1,084,140 1,826,410 3,560,758 866,666 7,337,974 6,010,151 55%

Mozambique Programme Team Costs

PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT AND STAFF COST

Personnel Costs 14,331,757 5,564,088 2,513,374 3,506,273 1,721,210 13,304,945 1,026,812 93%

Sub-total personnel costs 14,331,757 5,564,088 2,513,374 3,506,273 1,721,210 13,304,945 1,026,812 93%

Programme Programme Support Costs

27

Support Costs Equipment 1,700,624 177,150 666,050 785,495 35,642 1,664,337 36,287 98%

Country Office Operational Costs 3,598,791 1,257,802 978,677 817,421 924,295 3,978,195 (379,404) 111% N3

Sub-total programme support 5,299,415 1,434,952 1,644,726 1,602,917 959,937 5,642,532 (343,118) 106%

TOTAL PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT AND STAFF COSTS

19,631,172 6,999,040 4,158,101 5,109,189 2,681,147 18,947,477 683,695 97%

TOTAL PROGRAMME COSTS 169,025,956 30,238,472 26,814,508

61,387,292 20,295,789 138,736,061

30,289,894 82%

7% of flat Rate for Indirect Costs 11,502,467 3,632,691 1,874,010 3,928,516 1,420,705 10,855,923 9,628,457 94%

GRAND TOTAL 180,528,422 33,871,163 28,688,518

65,315,808 21,716,494 149,591,984

39,918,351 83%

Notes

N1- Expenses were higher compared to funds budgeted.

N2- Expenses were higher because the venue for the Consultative Forum was changed from Maputo to Quelimane.

N3 - IPOs still have challenge to manage cost operational office.

28

8.2. RISK ANALYSIS Internal risk analysis for each IPO, will figure in the individual reports of each IPO. This report merely wants to point out the most relevant external risks in

relation to implementation of the AGIR Programme. The context is not static; other economic and environmental aspects in the risk analysis matrix were

included. These aspects were identified as New Risks Identified

External Risks to implementation of AGIR Programme in Mozambique (Domestic political context)

Risk Risk level10: High, Medium, low.

Mitigation

Socio – Economic- New Risk Identified

After years of a fast growing economy, especially related to the expansion in developments related to the extractive industry, it is now clear that growth expectations were not very much realistic. Not only are taxes and income from this industrial development much lower than expected; even more so because the state is indebted beyond sustainability, through megaprojects such as Ematum and Proindico – indirectly financing military investments. The state has further contracted more debts (kept as secret) during the last 5 years of the former presidential period. The current debt level is considered unsustainable and will have a direct impact on the state’s ability to finance its budget, as well as its ability to comply with its other financial obligations such as international debt repayments (including bonds). This in conjunction with major donors’ decision to stop financing of the Mozambique state budget will lead to big financial gaps with less funds available for social sectors such as health and education. Space for CSO´s to monitor budgets might become even more restricted/less transparent.

Likelihood high Impact high

For AGIR IPO´s to closely monitor developments and actions/reactions of the GOM in managing the debt crisis. Ensure use of available spaces (even if decreasing) to improve transparency and financing of basic social services. Strengthen links with international advocacy and lobby institutions to insure support for advocacy and access to information in-country. Support PO´s in their support to populations’ organizations for better livelihoods.

Governo de Moçambique, Junho 2015, Mecanismo Multisectorial de Atendimento Integrado a Mulher Vitima de violência; Ministerio da Saude manual Para Atendimendo Integrado as Vitimas de Violencia , Junho, 2015

29

Prices of basic goods have risen more than 50%, leaving the populations ability to maintain a normal livelihood impossible. In this setting, public services, such as health and education are neglected by state support, whilst privatization in the sector is rife – creating a situation where most people cannot afford to access quality services in this sector.

Non-inclusive growth, increasing the gap between the poor and rich.

Focus on interaction with government institutions at different levels to improve understanding of impact of corruption. Ensure information flow to CSO`s and citizens in order to organize constructive interactions with government at all levels

Increased corruption (Mozambique is now amongst the top 10 most corrupt countries in Africa according to TI’s Global Corruption Barometer 2014).

Political -

1. Increased military conflict Lack of inclusive political environment leads to instability in the country. The war against the opposition’s armed forces is devastating vast regions in the central area of the country – producing refugees in neighboring countries (Malawi and Zimbabwe).

Likelihood is high Impact is high

IPO´s to monitor closely on security situation, together with partners, to ensure safety of personnel and beneficiaries at all times. (security plan) IPO´s to adapt planning according to accessibility of Partners/ geographical areas of intervention – in coordination with EoS.

The internal power struggle in FRELIMO is leading to a kind of dual state situation. Even with the current President being the party president, there is no change in political course – there is an increasingly militarization.

Likelihood is high Impact is high

30

Lack of separation of power between the State and the ruling party FRELIMO.

Likelihood is high Impact is high

Lack of implementation of the Peace Accords of 1992 and 2014. Resulting in military actions in the central area of country.

Likelihood high Impact to high

Democratic rule of law under pressure (e.g. freedom of expression, press freedom and political participation). Opposition members are systematically murdered by “unknown” groups. Outspoken personalities ( also from civil society and partners of IBIS) are threatened and intimidated in leaving the country

Likelihood high Impact high

Close monitoring by all IPOs, jointly with the (I)NGO and Donor community to ensure safety of POs, staff and beneficiaries at all times. Periodical analysis on situation and adaptation of security plans.

A general decrease in the space for civil society, as well as a co-option of civil society and academics by the dominant party in power.

Likelihood high Impact high

Close monitoring and analysis – followed by adaptation plans where possible – in coordination with EoS

A general decrease in tolerance of INGO´s, especially when focusing on development of civil society. (non-issuing of work permits for ex-pats) This has resulted in INGO´s leaving the country.

Likelihood High Impact High

2. Co-option of civil society by government and/or industry

In a context of decrease of donors that support CSO´s, the political or extractive industry company interference in the CSO´s can influence the quality of their work.

Likelihood High Impact High

What IPO´s did in 2015 is a Improving internal democratic structures. Ensured that all social organs are engaged in the organization

3. New legislation which severely limits the operations and financing of CSO activities and INGO´s

Likelihood High Impact High

The interventions of the CSO´s in the political and economic context have proven effective which fears that freedoms are limited. All CSO´s in Mozambique are financially dependent on what makes them very fragile

Since AGIR I IPO´s have been developing actions with the PO´s in order to improve their communication strategies with all stakeholders.

Climate- New Risk Identified

31

Mozambique is one of the most vulnerable counties to climate change in southeast Africa, the effects of which risk undermining possible social and economic progress and achievements. Climate change impacts most severely the poorest and highly vulnerable groups of people and makes it more difficult to break the cycle of poverty. 2015 saw floods in central Mozambique ate the beginning of the year, whilst in the southern part a widespread drought continued into 2016 – affecting 900.000 people by march 2016. (Estimated 1.500.000 people affected by October 2016). Government declared temporary red alert late in the process (over 900.000 people affected).

Likelihood is high Impact is low

When disaster impacts on accessibility for POs/IPOs to reach planned areas of intervention, plans will be adjusted to ensure the maximum realization of original planned support. ( risk of higher costs – to be negotiated and adapted with EoS)

Currently Mozambique is experiencing the effects of “El Nino” (2015 – 2016) – with extreme drought in most of southern regions and parts of the central region. It is expected that later 2016, the effects of ‘La Nina” will start, resulting in extreme weather conditions of excessive rains and cyclones.

32

8.3. OVERARCHING RESULTS FRAMEWORK

Objectively verifiable

indicators

Baseline

(Jan 2015)

Target Means of

verification

Status by End of 2015

Mid-term

(Dec 2017)

End-line

(Dec

2020)

Impact: A Mozambican society

where its citizens,

particularly also women

and other presently

marginalized groups, fully

enjoy their rights to social

inclusion and gender

equity, to retribution of

wealth created from the

country’s patrimony, to

accessible and

affordable public services

of good quality, to basic

civil freedoms and to

political representation

and participation; in a

peaceful and

ecologically sustainable

environment

Increase in gender

development index,

above the SADC

countries’ average

(Benchmark) +3% +10% UN Human

Development

report

Increase in social

institutions and gender

index, above the SADC

countries’ average

(Benchmark) +3% +10% SIGI report

Increase in social

institutions and gender

index, above the SADC

countries’ average

(Benchmark) +2% +5% Afrobarometer,

World Values

Surveys,

Minorities at Risk

reports

Coverage of strategic

poverty reduction and key

public services operational

budget from tax revenues

TBD 40% 95% State Budget

Progress towards linearly

extrapolated (post-2015)

MDGs, above the SADC

countries’ average

(Benchmark) +5% +20% UN (Post-2015)

MDG progress

reports

33

Increase in human

freedom index, above the

SADC countries’ average

(Benchmark) +5% +15% Freedom

House’s

freedom reports

Increase in democracy

index, above the SADC

countries’ average

(Benchmark) +5% +15% Economist

Intelligence

Unit’s

democracy

index reports

Increase in Africa

governance index, above

the SADC countries’

average

(Benchmark) +5% +15% Mo Ibrahim

Foundation’s

Africa

governance

reports

Final

outcome:

The emergence of an

active, strong and vibrant

civil society in

Mozambique, who

legitimately raise and

channel the voice of the

female and male right

holders who are at

present being politically,

socially and

economically

marginalized, secure their

access to all information

they need to exercise

their civil rights, and

effectively participating

in and influencing the

course of policy decision-

making process and

accountability of the

% of CSO´s who score

positive on their

governance, social

legitimacy, management,

financial systems and

sustainability assessments

TBD 45% 95% AGIR

assessments

% of CSO´s whose

campaigns reach more

than 85% of their strategies

targets for two

consecutive years

TBD 20% 85% Campaign

evaluation

reports; Annual

reports of

partner

organizations

% of CSO´s whose

campaigns were designed

in direct and decisive

participation with (a

representation from) the

right holders (of the right

holders’ choice)

TBD 70% 100% Campaign

planning

reports; Annual

reports of

partner

organizations

34

duty bearers for a

transparent, democratic,

inclusive, gender just and

human rights sensitive

governance

% of CSO´s who are

regularly (at least once a

month) invited by duty

bearers to contribute to

relevant documents (e.g.

poverty reduction

strategies, sectorial annual

and strategic plans)

TBD 15% 50% Campaign

evaluation

reports; Annual

reports of

partner

organizations

Theme 1:

Goal for

Theme 1:

Right to Inclusion and Equality

A political ecosystem in which all the rights-holders (women, girls and other marginalized groups) are equally included in the socio-economic

development process is established and functioning

Long-term

outcomes:

Oxfam2a: Mainstream norms and

beliefs enable women to have equal

chances for social, economic and

political participation

% of Men and

Women that

shows positive

attitudes and

behaviors to

gender equality

in their daily lives

20%

40% 70% Gender norms

and attitudes

surveys

BL Research

N/A – Figures to be

confirmed through a MTR in

2018

# policies and

mechanisms

created by

initiative of duty

bearers to

promote gender

equality that are

duly

implemented

4 5 6 Annual Reports of

the PES (Plano

Económico

Social); State

Budget

Apart from the figures in the

baseline, there was also the

approval of the National

Strategy for Prevention of

Early Marriage which also

encompasses issues related

to promotion of gender

equality. Thus, quantitatively,

the cumulative figure is 5

(baseline+1). Qualitatively,

WLSA continued to work with

the Ministry of Gender, Child

and Social Action, Ministry of

Interior, Ministry of Health

(Health Training Centres),

Ministry of Justice (School of

35

Judges to be) and the

Attorney General to

promote gender equality.

Additionally, WLSA and

Forum Mulher led Women´s

National Conference to

reflect on women´s rights.

# relevant inter-

national

protocols and

mechanisms to

promote the

rights of women

ratified,

adopted,

adapted and

under implemen-

tation

2 2 3 National

Constitution;

Women specific

legislation; Sector

(Ministry of Health,

Ministry of Social

Action, Ministry of

Justice, Ministry of

Interior) Plans

No new relevant

international protocol

approved, but the MDG´s

have been changed into

Sustainable Development

Goals (SDG). Furthermore,

Fórum Mulher, WLSA and

WLSA participated in the

Commission for the Status of

Women which also discussed

issues related to gender

promotion.

Oxfam2b: Gender based violence is

prevented and victims of GBV are

effectively supported by government

structures

# of women that

have reported to

have suffered

from GBV

2225

4450 8900 GAMC reports The number of women that

have reported to have

suffered from gender based

violence increased in 5%,

from 15,628 in January 2015

to 16,372, in December 2015,

according to some partners’

(AMME, WLSA, FM, NAFEZA,

HOPEM, Lambda, PNDH,

Nweti) 2015 Annual Reports

36

% of women who

reported GBV

who are satisfied

by attendance

of police,

judiciary and

psycho-social

counselors

20%

45% 65% Satisfaction

surveys

GAMC

FM

WLSA

N/A – Figures to be

confirmed through the MTR

in 2018

WLSA continued to work with

the judiciary, Ministry of

Interior, Ministry of Health

and the Attorney General on

strategies to reduce gender

based violence.

Oxfam2c: The majority of women in

their reproductive age have free and

unrestricted access to adequate

sexual and reproductive health

services

% of women in

reproductive age

who feel free to

access SRH care

15%

25% 40% MISAU

WLSA

N/A – Figures to be

confirmed

through the MTR in 2018

N´weti continued to work

with the Ministry of Health

on promotion of SRHR

through a social and

behavior change

communication (TV and

Radio Programme - Tua

Cena). Additionally, AMME

and NAFEZA continued

awareness raising activities

to promote girls and

women´s access to SRHR.

# districts at

national level

providing SRHR

128 144 144 MISAU

Homepage;

MISAU 2014 PES

Review

128 districts provided SRHR

services

37

# of health units

in the country

that apply

humanization of

health services

initiatives

Information

not available.

+30% +65% MISAU

Homepage;

MISAU 2014 PES

Review

35 health units (27%)

implementing initiatives

aimed at humanizing health

services in 2015

Oxfam3: Duty-bearers and community

leaders display positive attitudes

towards the rights of LGBTI, PLWHA

and elderly people and their social

and political inclusion

% of duty bearers

and leaders

displaying

positive attitudes

towards rights of

LGTBI, PLWHA

and older people

LGBTI: 1%

PLWHA: 15%

Older: 40%

)

5%

30%

50%

15%

60%

60%

Attitude surveys

FTI, LAMBDA and

RENSIDA Reports

N/A – Figures to be

confirmed through the MTR

in 2018

Although there is no a formal

and legal approval of

Lambda, the Ministry of

Health introduced two

relevant reforms in 2015. First,

it started to provide drugs

and medical consumables

destined specifically to LGBT.

Second, the revised list of

essential drugs includes LGBT

specific needs. FTI and

PSCM-PS disseminated the

law on rights of older people.

The Ministry of Health and

the National AIDS Council,

approved, with contributions

from some partners

(Lambda, RENSIDA, N´weti

and Hopem), the National

Strategy on HIV and AIDS

(PENIV), including rights of

PLWHA.

38

# specific legal

frameworks

related to

promotion of

rights of

marginalized

groups (LGBTI,

PLWHA, and

older people)

2

(Law on

discrimination

against

PLWHA, law

on promotion

of the rights of

older people)

2 3 State Journal;

Shadow reports

Apart from the ones in the

baseline, 2 relevant

policies/legal frameworks

were approved: PENIV and

the Penal Code.

We2a: Civil society organizations and

rights holders successfully influence

formulation and implementation of

policies promoting equitable rural

growth and right to food

# of policies

strategies and

programmes

designed in

direct and

decisive

participation with

righters holders´

representatives

5 10 15 Policy papers,

strategies and

government

programmes,

Minutes, partners

reports

Although partners are

involved in processes related

to promoting equitable rural

growth and right to food,

there was less dynamic in

these areas: Two proposals

regarding i) the degree of

the Tax Regime Law for

cooperative enterprises and

regulation of the law of

modern Cooperatives were

submitted by AMPCM11 to

the government for

approval. Partners have also

been involved in the

consultation process of

elaboration of the Rural

Development Strategy. The

Final document is influenced

and contains the vision of

CSO´s about Rural

Development in the Country.

Two Multi- sectorial Plans for

the Reduction of Chronic

Malnutrition (PAMRDC), one

in Nampula and the other

11 AMPCM - Mozambican Association for promotion of modern Cooperatives

39

We2b: Civil society and rights holders

have improved their mobilization and

advocacy to promote policy change

on equitable rural growth and right to

food

one in Tete, were

elaborated, with

participation of AENA and

UPCT, together with

members of farmer’s district

unions. The plans were

approved and adopted by

provincial governments in

both Provinces. OMR have

been involved in the

elaboration of two

documents: The first to be

to be used as a reference

for formulation, by WFP, of

the strategy on food

security and nutrition in

Mozambique to be

submitted to the

government in 2016, the

second, supported by FAO,

The draft guidelines for the

Support of Family Agriculture

in the CPLP countries will be

discussed and Adopted by

The Presidents of the CPLP

countries in July 2016 in Brazil

# of dialogue

sessions with key

policy makers,

and duty bearers

to which CSO´s

are invited

24

35

50

Minutes, partners

reports

During 2015, partners

attended more than 7

dialogue sessions with

National and Provincial

governments, mostly the

agriculture sector’s and

Parliamentarians,

concerning: i) revision of

the Master Plan of and

consultation process

(rounds) the PROSAVANA;

40

ii) The increase of

agribusiness in the

Agriculture sector.

Additionally, meetings were

also undertaken for approval

of provincial Agriculture

reports and planed activities

for 2016.

Diakonia 3 - There is an increase of

public resources allocation for

improved universal access to key

public service (justice, education,

health, SRHR, and social service) by

the most vulnerable groups;

Proportion (%) of

budget

allocated to

each key service

area at national

level;

1-education-

19.8%

2- Health -

9.1%

3-SRH - N/A

4- Justice –

1.9%

5- social

service –3.5%

20%

9.55

N/A

-

-

22.8%

10.2%

N/A

2.0%

3.6%

-Analyze on the

annual budget

and state

account reports

In 2015 there was some

increase in the total budget

allocate at national level in

some social areas of interest

of the sub-programme.

About 63, 5% of the state

budget (3, 4 thousand million

dollars) was allocated to the

social and economic sectors

against 2.7 thousand million

dollars in 2014 (52, 7%)

representing an increase of

budget allocation to social

and economic sector of

about 10.8%. The education

sector has received 1248

million dollars, corresponding

to 22, 8% of the total budget

expenditure, against 1035

million dollars in 2014 (19, 8%

of the total budget). The

health sector has received

561, 5 million dollars (10, 2%

Ratio (in #) of

available senior

professional’s in

each area

(teachers/

medical doctors/

judges) at district

level;

1-education-

1 teacher/69

2- Health – 1

doctor for

30.000

inhabitants;

3-SRH - N/A14

1/60

1/27.000

N/A

1/95 mil

1/50

1/25m

1/90 mil

Sectorial Reports

(Education, Health

and Justice)

14 No updated figures found.

41

4- Justice – 1

judge/100.000

inhabitants;

5- social

service –

N/A

N/A

of the total budget),

representing an increase of

1, 1% against 477, 6 million

dollars in 2014, when the

expenditure attained 9, 1%12.

Regarding budget

allocation that would

contribute for more access

to justice and social

protection, the scenario from

the 2015 budget is described

below.

- Total budget (national

level) allocated for the

judicial system J3, 525.6

Meticais in (2014) equivalent

to 1.9% of the total budget.

In 2015, the budget

allocated 4,001.7 Meticais

equivalent to 2.0 % of the

total state budget. For social

protection and labour, the

proposition of state budget

allocated was 6,509.7

Meticais, equivalent to 3, 5%

of the total budget in 2014.

In 2015 there was an

% of resources

allocated for

gender,

disabled, poor’s

and aged

people inclusion;

Disaggregate

d data not

available;15

- - Annual report of

Gender, child and

Social actin

sector.

12 Orçamento do Estado de Moçambique cresce em 2015 para 6315 milhões de dólares, 2016, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/pt/category/noticias/, 22/03/16, 12:15:00 15 The aim is that by 2017 (2020) desegregated data is available as a result of partners’ advocacy.

42

increase of 0, 1% (3.55) in the

total State budget amount

allocated, equal to 7,087.5

Meticais. Although there was

a small increase, resource

allocations for the most

vulnerable groups remained

scarce13.

Considering that the most

vulnerable groups are more

concentrated at province

and district levels, the 2015

State budget has reduced

the percentage of budget

allocated centrally from 69%

to 59, 8% increase over the

provincial budget (from 17,

8% to 23, 2%), district (from

11, 8% to 23, 2%) and

municipalities (from 1, 4% to

1, 6%). This scenario meant

that there was more money

to be allocated to those

decentralised places.

13 Previsão das Despesas nas Áreas de Protecção Social de forma a prosseguir com a implementação da Estratégia de Protecção Social Básica que tem como objectivo mitigar o impacto do

custo de vida da população mais desfavorecida, está previsto o montante de 3.522,3 milhões de MT, onde o número de beneficiários passará dos 439.144 previstos em 2014 para cerca de

475.097, em 2015, um aumento nominal de 8,2%.

http://www.dno.gov.mz/docs/OE2015/Orcam_Cidadao%202015_Versao_Final.pdf, Maputo, 22/0372016, 12:44:00

43

Diakonia1a- A set of public policies,

regulations and laws creating an

enabling framework/ environment for

a broader social inclusion, of the

most vulnerable rights holders, have

been approved or reviewed by the

duty bearer’s at the parliament;

# of new or

revised policies,

regulations, laws

on key service

provision;

The

Constitutional

rights; and

Laws about

inclusive

education;

access to

health care

including

sexual

reproductive

health care;

access to

justice (Lei

17/2003) and

to social

protection of

vulnerable

people (Lei

4/2007,

Decree

85/2009 -

women,

infected by

HIV and AIDS,

elderly) and

to minors;

1; 2; 3;5 4; Partner’s reports/

Republics Bulletin

and gov, website;

On top of other existing

policy, legislative and

programmatic documents,

during 2015 new tools were

approved and entered in

force (national level), which

will improve the enabling

environment for change and

social inclusion;

✓ Approved the

National Strategy for

Prevention

premature marriage

in Mozambique

(December 2015) –

AMMCJ,

✓ Approved the new

National HIV and

AIDS response

Strategy (PEN V)16—

✓ Approved the

revised penal code

which has removed

ambiguous legal

aspects that

threatened the

realization of human

rights of the sexual

minorities and has

incorporated articles

16 Approved November 2015

44

that decriminalizes

the abortion –The

state budget 2015

indicating increase

in the social sectors

(health care and

education) –

Level (three

levels scale), of

gender and

vulnerable

groups

inclusiveness on

the new/revised

policy

frameworks;

Actual level of

data

disaggregatio

n (by gender/

vulnerable

groups) for

better

monitoring

and

accountability

demanding

was assessed,

by partners, to

be low;

Medium high Evaluation reports

/ qualitative

studies reports;

Target set to 2017 not

assessed in 2015 as it was

unlikely to change in the

initial yer of the programme;

Theme 2:

Goal for

Theme 2:

Right to Retribution of Wealth Created from the Country’s Patrimony

As a result of rights holders’s access to information, these claim for fair distribution of resources and duty bearers improve wealth retribution created from the country’s patrimony

45

Long-term

outcome:

Oxfam4: The extractive sector in

Mozambique is transparent,

accountable, and responsible (fiscally,

economically, environmentally and

socially) and contributes as a result

significantly to the socio-economic

development of the country

% infrastructure

investment costs

and recurrent

running costs for

basic services

covered by

revenues from

extractive

industries

Information

not

available.

35%

25%

75%

65%

State Budget Figures on the contribution of

the extractive industry

revenues to the State

Budget and re-enforcement

of infrastructure are not

available so far due to

resistance of some

government officials to

provide disaggregated data

on budget sources. Thus,

reporting on these figures will

be through a medium-term

review to be carried out in

2018

% state budget

deriving from

extractive

industries

Information

not

available.

20% 35% State Budget

% of mining

companies that

implement their

environmental

management

plans

50% 65% 80% Cadastro

Mineiro; MICOA

Report

46

IBIS1: Governmental duty bearers in

the EI show proof of taking

accountability vis-à-vis the access to

information law, including the respect

for it, while private sector duty bearers

take accountability by responding

positively to rights

safeguarding

1. % of national /

international

companies

holding

concessions in

extractive sector

who regularly

supply information

under EITI

31% 50- -100 EITI; INE; DNO

National statistics

on Poverty

In 71 projects selected to

provide information to the

EITI report, 15 didn’t reply,

which corresponds to 21%, of

which, 13 in mining project

and 2 in hydrocarbons

projects. The figure of those

who reacted positively

represents a percentage of

79%.

2. % of of EI

projects who

report tax under

EITI

84 100 100 According to the Extractive

Industry Transparency

Initiative (EITI) report, in 6th

biannual report (current and

recent included the fiscal

years 2013-2014, published in

December 2015, we can

see, in about 151 existing

extractive industry projects in

the mining area, 51 were

selected through the

materiality criterion or having

a contribution less than

500.000MT, representing 33%

of those which reported the

payment of tax. In what

refers to hydrocarbon

project, all of them (20) did

report their tax payment,

47

which represents 100%.

3. Ratio of

Expenditure for

Education and

Health / total

Revenue (in%)

34 40 50 Based on the EITI report, the

total of revenue coming

from extractive industries,

excluding capital gains, was

MZM 13.476.675.577,7. The

2015 PES report is not clear

on whether this revenue has

contributed to the

expenditure for education

and health sectors.

4. Contribution of

mega projects

(incl. EI) revenue

to total revenue

(in %)

6,7 10 20 The contribution of revenue

in 2015 according to the EITI

report (excluding capital

gains) to the state budget

was 3, 79%, which is lower

than the set target. Actually,

this is explained by the

reduction of commodities

prices in the international

market, mainly coal. So, the

initial expectations have

drastically changed.

48

5. Poverty Index

by target

Provinces

CD: 37.4

NA: 57.7

ZA: 70.5

TE: 42.0

CD: 31.8

NA: 49.0

ZA: 59.9

TE: 35.7

CD: 27.0

NA: 41.7

ZA: 54.9

TE: 30.0

Based on the Family Budged

Survey (IOF2014/15) the

poverty indexes in the areas

with natural resources

abundance, calculate by

household, is far from

achieving the target, for

instance in the AICE’s priority

provinces. In Cabo Delgado

the poverty index is 53%,

Nampula (36%) and Tete

(45%). We can see that

Nampula province is where

the poverty indexes

reduced. The reason for that

is still to be surveyed.

6. Ratio of

Employment

Index in industry /

average Business

Volume Index in in

EI and mining (in

%).

22 30 50 Based on the PES 2015

forecast, the extractive

industry sector should create

192,446 employments, but

according to the EITI data

(6th report), only 27,560 jobs

were created, which

corresponds to only 14% of

what had been forecast. The

percentage is lower when

compared to the target

which had been set (30%),

which can be explained by

the crisis in the price of

commodities (coal in

particular) in the

49

international market, plus the

delays in the establishment

of plants, especially in Cabo

Delgado.

7. Evidence that

at least 5% of

royalties from EI

are earmarked in

annual budget for

communities in

districts affected

by EI(Yes / No)

No

CD: N

NA: N

TE: N

CD: Y

NA: Y

TE: Y

CD: Y

NA: Y

TE: Y

Based on the EITI 6th report,

an amount of MZM 16.2

million generated from this

sector was transferred to the

state administrations of the

communities whereby

exploitations are being

undertaken, namely through

tax royalties (2,75%). Moatize

(in Tete) obtained MZM 8.6;

Moma (in Nampula) MZM 2.3

million. Cabo Delgado,

another priority province for

AICE, received nothing, to to

the non-start of the LNG

project (concretely in

Palma). The rest of the

above mentioned MZM 16.2

million for transferred to

other provinces with EI

projects (Inhambane, in

particular).

50

% 5) - -

51

We1a: Civil society organizations and

rights-holders successfully advocate

the respect for legal and customary

rights to land and natural resources

# of advocacy

processes and

events addressing

land and NR

designed in direct

and decisive

participation of

rights holders

representatives

131

150

200 Policy papers,

Open letters,

Media articles,

Minutes, Process

plans, Reports,

Radio and TV

debate/

programmes

All 13 Partners of the NACE

subprogram were more

dynamic demonstrating

engagement in promotion of

advocacy and lobby on

land and natural resources

with significant results. More

than 30 processes, of which

7 position papers, 15

seminaries and workshops, 8

demonstrations were carried

out with involvement of right

holders. This was among

others due to the maturation

of ongoing processes (e.g.

the campaign “Nao ao

Prosavana), Palma case in

Pemba, Vale, Jindal and

ICLV cases in Tete, Kenmare

in Nampula and other

mining investments, forestry

and land process in all

provinces; that resulted in

positive decisions and

measures taken by the

Government (e.g. The

launch by MITADER of the

Project “Terra Segura” where

5 million DUAT´s should be

given to communities by

2019. The agreement on

revising The Prosavana

Master Plan, MoU and

agreements signed by duty

52

bears with right holders).

53

# of women who

through partners´

support received

land titles (DUAT)

with verified

benefits

54

65

100

Minutes, partners

reports, ,M&E

visits

During 2015, ORAM

continued to support

women to acquire DUATs,

both individually and/or

collectively as members of

women associations or

gender mixed associations.

A total of 39 areas of

associations where

demarcated, benefiting 313

women. Additionally, CTV

carried out a study on

“Customary Rules and

Practices Strengthen

Women’s Land Tenure in

Rural

Mozambique”,(www.ctv.org.

mz or www.namati.og),

We1b: Civil society and rights holders

have improved their mobilization and

advocacy for land rights and benefits

from natural resources

1.5.1 # of

processes to

which CSO's have

been invited by

duty bearers

139 150 200

Theme 3:

Goal for

Theme 3:

Right to Accessible and Affordable Public Services of Good Quality

Empowered CSO (partner organization’s) defending the rights-holders (women and men) right to accessible, affordable and high quality public

services and to a safe and healthy environment

54

long-term

outcome:

Oxfam1: Duty-bearers increasingly

take citizens’ demands into account

and as a result, the State Budget to

key public service sectors (health,

water, public transport and social

protection) has increased with 25% as

compared to 2015

% of state

budget

allocated to key

public service

sectors

43.9% +8% +20% State budget According to 2015 Annual

reports from some partners

(Akilizetho, CIP, ESTAMOS,

Facilidade, Nweti, GMD e

PSCM-PS) that are part of

development

observatories, the

percentage of state

budget allocated to key

public sectors decreased

from 43,9 % at the

beginning of the year to

38,9%. This is under-

achievement as the target

was 46,9%.

IBIS3:

Female and male rights -holders and

CSO´s are able to make evidence

based suggestions to the

improvement of quality and coverage

of services in health and education

sector in the selected provinces and

local governments

1. Nº of annual

pieces of

evidence17

aimed at

improving

services in

Education

and Health

and / or

influencing

policy

decisions and

changes

(plans,

budgets)

NA18:

Educ: 0

Health: 0

ZA

Educ: 0

Heath: 0

NA:

Edu: 2

Health: 1

ZA

Educ: 3

Health: 2

NA:

Educ: 4

Health:

2

ZA

Educ: 6

Health:

3

Admin data;

IPO / CSO / PSO data,

(social)

Survey data.

Baseline survey; Mid-

term and final

On what regards the

Education Sector,

according to Balanço

Anual do PES 2015 for

Zambézia Province,

improvements were

reported in Education and

Health sectors. 84 new

schools became available

in the that province

reducing the province

average distance school-

home from 2,4 to 2,2 km in

EP1 and, 3,3 to 3,1 Km in

17 studies, statistics, survey, monitoring report etc. 18 NA stands for Nampula and ZA stands for Zambézia

55

produced

and

submitted to

subnational

executive

(municipal

and

provincial

governments)

and / or

sectorial

services;

evaluation survey;

Media coverage;

Partners reports; AGIR

reports; Balanço Anual

do Plano Económico

Social Provincial and

MINEDH and MISAU

Annual Reports.

EP2. Mocuba and Alto-

Molócue reported

respectively 3.2% and 0.4%

of increase in number of

schools available

comparatively with the

previous year [2014].

According to the same

report, ratio pupil/teacher

increased in the province

from 70 to 71.

In the Health Sector,

Zambézia province

registered an increase in

the number of health

centers available, with 3

more if compared to the

previous year and the

number of Medical

Doctors available in the

province also increased by

31.8%. Child and maternal

health coverage plan for

2015 in Mocuba and Alto-

Molócue districts was

exceeded by 14% and

4.4%, respectively.

According to MINEDH 2015

report, Nampula Province

hired 566 male and 567

female additional

teachers, reaching the

56

set target for the year

under review.

2. Quality of

submissions (non-

submission= 0;

poor = 1;

medium =2;

good=3);

NA:

Educ: 0

Health: 0

ZA

Educ: 0

Health: 0

NA:

Educ: 2

Health: 2

ZA

Educ: 3

Health: 2

NA:

Educ: 3

Health:

3

ZA

Educ: 3

Health:

3

3. Fix rate, in % NA:

Educ: 0

Health: 0

ZA

Educ: 0

Health: 0

NA

Educ: 30

Healt: 20

ZA

Educ: 30

Health: 20

NA

Educ 80

Health:

50

ZA

Educ:

80

Health:

50

57

We3: Rights holders (women and men)

are empowered to advocate for,

influence, monitor the implementation

of, and hold duty bearers

accountable for measures that secure

a safe and healthy environment and

promote resilience to climate change

impacts

We 3b: Civil society and rights holders

have improved their mobilization and

advocacy to promote policy change

# of spaces for

dialogue with

duty bearers,

advocacy

events and

mobilization

(alliances and

networks)

61

75

100

Policy papers/

documents, Open

letters, Media articles,

Minutes, Process plans,

Reports, Publications

During 2015, The Climate

change and environment

outcome areas have seen

considerable actions

especially at national level

(e.g. preparedness of civil

society to participate in

the Cop 21). 3

Considerable spaces of

dialogue with duty bearers

especially at national level

were established by

partners in this area of

results: First: A Joint

consultation Meeting with

MITADER to discuss and

prepare a common

document of Mozambique

to be presented in Cop

21/ (Intended National

Determined Contribution).

Second: The Seminar on

REDD + Initiative and

elaboration of the Kick Off

of the National REDD +

Strategy in Mozambique

organized by MITADER

Third: Under the National

Platform of SC

organization on Climate

Change, a Consultative

group were established

with MITADER to work on

climate change and

58

on equitable rural growth and right to

food

environment issues.

59

# of position

papers

contribute for

better dialogue

13

15

20 Position papers/

documents, Open

letters, Media articles,

Minutes, Reports,

Publications

8 position documents and

papers were developed

and submitted to

national or international

government’s regarding

the COP 21, Climate

Justice, common

principles of adaptation

and mitigation of Climate

Changes , REED+, EU

energy goals,

environmental impacts of

construction of Mphanda

Nkuwa dam on

Communities

Two Platforms revitalized in

2015, and conducted

meetings focused on

discussing environmental

issues and define

strategies for advocacy:

The National Platform of

CSO on Climate Change,

the forum of CSO for

marine and coastal area

FOSCAMC.

# and diversity of

strategies and

spaces for

mobilization and

advocacy by

CSO´s on

environment and

climate change

40

45

60

Policy papers/

documents, Open

letters, Media articles,

Minutes, Process plans,

Reports, Publications

Diakonia 1b)- There is a remarkable

increase of public resources (% of the

total state budget) allocated for

improved universal access to key

public service (justice, education,

health, SRHR, and social service) by

% of total state

budget

proportion

allocated to

each key service

area at national

Data of

2015

1-

educatio

191-

Education-

inclusive

schools not

progressing;

22.8%

10.2%

N/A

Annual budget and

annual budget

expenditure reports;

social and economic

plans;

Increased recognition, by

the duty bearers (the

elected and the

professional civil servants),

on the demands made, by

rights holders, for the need

19 Information provided by ACAMO (inclusive education, CESC (health services urban/rural), AMMCJ (justice).

60

the most vulnerable groups; level; n- 19.8%

2- Health -

9.1%

3-SRH -

N/A

4- Justice

–1.9%

5- social

service –

3.5%

2- Health –

poor access

on rural

areas and

for the poor;

3-SRH –

outdated

policy

4- Justice –

No

information

on access

at district

level;

5- social

service –

N/A

2.0%

3.6%

for improved state

performance in the

provision of public service

o quality (access to

education, health, SRHR,

justice, social service) in

Mozambique.

The state budget of 2015

indicates that there was

an increase of budget

allocated for the

improvement of key public

and basic services as we

can see below.

Education – 1248 million de

dollars, corresponding to

22,8% of the total budget

expenditure, against 1035

million dollars in 2014 (19,

8% of the total budget

Health including SRH–

561,5 million dollars (10, 2%

of the total budget),

representing an increase

of 1,1% against 477,6

million de dollars in 2014,

when the expenditure

attained 9,1%.i

Justice: 4,001.7meticas

equivalent to 2.0 % of the

total state budget against

61

3, 525.6 in metical in (2014)

equivalent to 1.9% of the

total budget.

Social Service (protection

and labor) - there was an

increase of 0, 1% (3.55)

increase in the total State

budget amount allocated,

equal to 7,087.5 against

the proposition of state

budget allocated was

6,509.7 equivalent to 3, 5%

of the total budget in 2014

Ratio (in #) of

available

professional’s in

each area

(teachers/

medical doctors/

judges) at district

level;

Data of

2015

1-

educatio

n- 1

teacher/6

9

2- Health

– 1 doctor

for 30.000

inhabitant

s;

3-SRH -

N/A

4- Justice

There has

been an

effort in

establishing

official

forums for

consultation

and policy

dialog with

CSO´s by

the

government

(at national

and

provincial

levels) with

different

levels of

openness to

1/50

1/25m

1/90 mil

N/A

Annual budget and

annual budget

expenditure reports;

social and economic

plans;

No information available

to report in 2015

62

– 1

judge/100

.000

inhabitant

s;

5- social

service –

be assessed;

Oxfam: 2.C.1: Duty-bearers adopt,

adapt and implement international

frameworks n SRHR

# of international

frameworks on

SRHR that

Mozambique has

ratified

3

(MDG,

Cairo

Declarati

on,

Internatio

nal

Planned

Parentho

od

Federatio

n)

3 4 MISAU 2014 PES

Review;

AMODEFA Annual

Reports

3 (Same as baseline and

target for 2015)

Oxfam: 2.c .1.1: CSO´s with capacity

to monitor international protocols on

SRHR

# of CSO´s finish-

ed capacity

building to

monitor inter-

national SRHR

frameworks

1

(FM)

720 7 Partners Annual

Reports

5 (FM, WLSA, Lambda,

HOPEM, Nweti)

20 WLSA, N’weti, CIP, HOPEM, FM, RENSIDA, LAMBDA

63

Oxfam: 2.c.2: Increased dialogue

and interaction between CSO´s and

duty-bearers on the quality and

accessibility of SRH care

# of government

events at all

levels to which

CSO´s are invited

to present their

information on

SRH care quality

and access

4 6 10 MISAU National

Coordinating Council

Aid Memoire;

Bi-Annual MISAU

Meetings with partners

Nweti (Invited by the

Ministry of Health during

the National Coordinating

Council and MoH-NGOs

Meeting), Lambda and

RENSIDA (Invited by the

AIDS National Council for

review of the PENIV),

Forum Mulher and PSCM-

PS (Invited by the Ministry

of Gender, Child and

Social Action to deliver

speeches during the

National Meeting with

partners)

# communities in

Maputo province

and city, Sofala,

Nampula,

Zambezia and

Niassa

participating in

SRH service

quality

monitoring

0

75 150 Reports of public

service provision

monitoring exercises

112 communities (Nweti –

26; SA- 4; Facilidade – 38;

Estamos – 27; NAFEZA – 5

and Wadzafika - 12

Oxfam:2.c.3: Reduced maternal and

child mortality rate trough the

improve the quality of SRH services

Maternal

mortality rate

0.13% -10% -25% MISAU 2015 PES

Review

0,4

Infant mortality

rate

79.2% -4% -10% MISAU 2015 PES

Review

N’weti, Facilidade, AMME

continued to work with the

64

Ministry of Health and its

local institutions to

promote institutional

deliveries among mothers-

to-be. Quantitative figures

will be updated through

the MTR in 2018

% pregnant

women who

completed 4

anti-natal care

visits

69% 84% 99% MISAU 2015 PES

Review

85%

Oxfam: 2.c.4: Duty-bearers are

responsive to CSO claims for approval

of law on abortion and its

implementation in practice.

# law on

abortion

approved

1 1 1 State Journal 1 (as per baseline and

target for 2015). WLSA,

N’weti, FM, NAFEZA ,

AMME and Lambda

continued to do

advocacy for the

implementation of the

Penal Code

% of sanitary units

providing safe

abortion

30% 50% 65% Reports of sanitary

units; MISAU Report

To be updated in 2018 MTR

# of CSO´s with

capacity to

engage with

2

(WLSA,

6 921 Capacity building

assessments

5 (WLSA, FM, Nweti,

Lambda, HOPEM)

21 WLSA, N’weti, CIP, HOPEM, FM, RENSIDA, , LAMBDA, ESTAMOS, Wadzafica.

65

duty-bearers and

moral authorities

on issues related

to abortion law

FM)

Oxfam:2.c.5: CSO´s effectively stage

ICT-base advocacy campaigns to

raise awareness and change attitude

and practises and eliminate harmful

cultural practices and prejudices that

promote early marriages, unwanted

pregnancies and sexual violations

# CSO using ICT-

based advocacy

campaigns on

SRHR and

underlying norms

and prcatices

3

(LAMBDA,

Nweti,

FM)

6 922 Campaign

evaluations and

reports

5 (LAMBDA, Nweti, FM,

HOPEM, FM )

DIAKONIA 3 - There is a markable

increase of public resources

allocated for improved universal

access to key public service (justice,

education, health, SRHR, and social

service) by the most vulnerable

groups;;

Rate of access to

family planning in

health posts per

districts covered

by partners

working on SRHR;

Zambézia

– 6.5%

Niassa –

6%

Zambézia –

8%

Niassa – 8%

Zambézi

a – 12%

Niassa –

11%

Ministry of health

reports/ INE reports

Regarding government

improved actions, for

better and inclusive SRH

service delivery in 2015,

the main changes

reported were at policy

and legislation levels

(AMMCJ and Muleide).

New strategies and

policies were put in place

as reported above. No

substantial evidences

were found/ reported

indicating any meaningful

change on governmental

performance to better

deliverer services at

Rate of access to

safe childbirth/

institutionalized

child delivery

services per

districts covered

Zambézia

- 27.8%

Zambézia-

29%

Niassa – 63%

Zambézi

a- 32%

Niassa –

65%

Ministry of health

reports/ INE reports

22 WLSA, N’weti, CIP, HOPEM, FM, RENSIDA, , LAMBDA, ESTAMOS, Wadzafica.

66

by partners

working on SRHR;

;

Niassa –

61.4%

province and district levels.

The new approved

strategy for family

planning23, with a

reference method on

women and girls at the

community and sanitary

unities has become more

important; a sign that

inclusion of women and

girls at community level, as

regarding SRH service, has

become a real public

policy priority. This strategy

implies the allocation of

more resources to SRH at

communities’ levels

(working at national level –

AMMCJ, FORCOM, and

YP; at provincial and

district level – NANA,

AMUDZA, ADEMUM –

Zambézia; Othoko—

Niassa, CESC, at selected

districts and

municipalities).

Rate of access to

free

contraceptives,

for safe sex life,

per districts

covered by

partners working

on SRHR;;

Zambézia

– 4.7%

Niassa –

12.4%

Zambézia-

6%

Niassa – 14%

Zambézi

a- 10%

Niassa –

18%

Ministry of health

reports/ INE reports

% pregnancies

with access to

prenatal and

antenatal health

services per

districts covered

by partners

working on SRHR

Zambézia

– 74%

Niassa –

90%

Zambézia –

77%

Niassa – 92%

Zambézi

a – 80%

Niassa –

95%

Ministry of health

reports/INE reports

23 Estratégia de Planeamento Familiar e Contracepção, approved in June 2010

67

% of population

with access to

medicines for

sexually

transmitted

diseases per

districts covered

by partners

working on SRHR

Not

available

- - District government

reports – health sector

Ministry of health

reports/INE reports

The Government is

implementing the

integrated Protocol for

assistance of women and

girls who have been

victims of sexual

harassment and domestic

violence (2012) - AMMCJ

and Muleide. In 2015, the

implementation of the

protocol was carried out in

partnership with CSO´s; the

main outcome was the

provision of capacity

building trainings to

technical personnel from

the health sector. The

focus of trainings was on

the functionality of the

mentioned protocol, with

reference to the Provincial

Health Department in

Niassa, 2015 the

implementation of the

protocol has also resulted

in expansion of health

technicians providing

psychiatric assistance to

victims of sexual

harassment and violence.

Theme 4:

Goal for

Right to basic civic freedoms. # 2 3 5

68

theme 4:

To contribute for an environment where people’s rights to expression, freedom and information’s is

guaranteed by law and respected all duty bearers;

Long-term

outcome: IBIS4: Freedom of expression, press freedom and diversity and RTI guaranteed in law and adhered to by duty bearers in practice

Country has

signed and

ratified all

relevant treaty

obligations and

regimes, with no

significant

exemptions (yes

/ no

No

yes

yes Reporters Without

Borders annual reports

The 2015 World Press

Freedom Index by

Reporters Without

Borders, released in the

first quarter of 2016,

reveals that

Mozambique dropped 2

positions on the world

press freedom, which is

(according to the same

source) due to self-

censorship and

assassination of a

journalist in 2015. Now,

Mozambique is in

position 87 out of 180

countries. The legal

environment as such did

have a positive change,

thanks to approval of the

RTI by-law. Regarding to

the adherence to

international treaties on

the matter, we expected

to commence the

process to join the Open

Government Partnership

Initiative, to which only

countries that have Right

69

to Information Law are

eligible. In 2016, more

concrete work will be

done at the level of

central duty bearers (via

the Ministério da

Administração Estatal e

Função Pública), with

which AICE

subprogramme has

already signed a MoU

aimed at promoting

wide access to public

interest information,

especially the one held

by the Government.

-Public is aware

of law enabling

access to official

information (No

awareness=0,

low degree= 1;

medium = 2;

high = 3).

0

2

3

Regional [SADC] Press

Freedom NGOs annual

reports;

Freedom House annual

reports

Regarding the

knowledge of the Right

to Information (RTI) law,

in 2015 the activities

focused on the

preparation of the Right

to Information ByLaw,

Partners proposed this

document that was

adopted almost in full

by the Government.

Furthermore, to ensure

that the principles of the

RTI law are respected,

the process of preparing

70

a study which presents

all legislation contrary to

the Right to Information

(Lei de Segredo do

Estado, Lei de

Segurança de Estado,

Lei de Imprensa e Lei de

Probidade Publica) has

been initiated. The draft

will be submitted to the

Parliament in 2016.

% of public bodies (govt and public companies) releasing information both pro-actively and on demand

20%

50%

90%

Laws revoked and/or

revised;

PO surveys

2015 was the first year

after the adoption of

the Right to Information

Law, so that there were

10 training sessions and

dissemination to duty

bearers (217) and CSO´s

(50) .In 2015, a survey on

the pre-conditions for

effective

implementation of RIL

was also concluded: this

found that the

preparedness of the

duty bearers and

proactive dissemination

of relevant information is

essential for the RTI law

to be effectively

implement. In 2016 AICE

71

will monitor the level of

public information

released by the

competent bodies and

the institutionalization of

information officer posts

in public sector.

Theme 5:

Goal for

theme 5

Right to Political Representation and Participation

To contribute for an improved, transparent, participative and gender inclusive democratic and political processes in Mozambique

4Long-term

outcome:

IBIS2: Female and male

parliamentarians at sub national levels

(provincial and local) in target areas

playing their oversight role and

demanding accountability from the

executive

1. % of women

chairing

parliamentary

committees

APs24: 25

AMs25: 12

APs: 30

AMs: 20

APs: 50

AMs: 30

Records of

parliamentary

administration and

municipal parliaments;

No data available at the

end of 2015. Partners

didn’t have in 2015

monitoring systems in

place with indicators

that could be used to

capture that information.

They are revising their

monitoring matrixes and

this information will be

collected during 2016.

2. Evidence of

competencies

of male and

female duty

bearers /

APs: 0

AMs: Yes

APs: Yes

AMs: Yes

APs: Yes

AMs: Yes

Parliamentary records,

CSO data, media

reports;

No data available at the

end of 2015. Partners

didn’t have in 2015

monitoring systems in

place with indicators

24 AP stands for Assembleia Provincial 25 AM stands for Assembleia Municipal

72

parliamentaria

ns’

(´champions’)

understanding

of

parliamentary

oversight and

accountability

role (Yes/ no)

that could be used to

capture that information.

They are revising their

monitoring matrixes and

this information will be

collected during 2016.

3. Increase of

queries on

sectorial and

geographical

spending

priorities in

plans and

budgets

tabled to

executives at

all levels (no

increase=0;

slight increase

= 1; medium

increase=2;

good

increase=3)

APs: 0

AMs: 0

APs: 1

AMs: 2

APs: 2

AMs: 3

Parliamentary records,

CSO data, media

coverage;

No data available at the

end of 2015. Partners

didn’t have in 2015

monitoring systems in

place with indicators

that could be used to

capture that information.

They are revising their

monitoring matrixes and

this information will be

collected during 2016

Nº of cases of

non-approval of

municipal PAO

and/or Conta de

Gerência (in all

municipalities in

target areas)

0 2 3 Records of Assembleias

Municipais (AM) and

media reports.

During 2015 there were

no cases of non-

approval of municipal

PAO and/or Conta de

Gerência (in all

municpalities in target

areas)

73

Diakonia 2a).- The process and results

of the elections are transparent,

reliable, complying with international

electoral standards (e.g. SADC

electoral principles and guidelines

and IDEA);

# of elections

observation

institutions which

clearly26

declared the

elections as

having been fair

and transparent;

0/8 –

National

(O.E, CIP,

PJ, ONP,

LDH,

FORCOM,

CESC,

OAM),

1/6-

Internationa

l (EU, SADC,

Carter

Foundation,

CEDEAO,

CPLP, EISA,

0/8 –

National

(O.E, CIP,

PJ, ONP,

FORCOM

, CESC,

OAM),

1/6-

Internatio

nal (EU,

SADC,

Carter

Foundati

on,

CEDEAO,

CPLP,

EISA,

- -All This expected long term

outcome is still to be

realized. Next elections

are expected only in

2018 and 2019.

Meanwhile, the Electoral

Observatory has started,

in 2015, a consultative

work towards the

development of a

position paper and a

political/legislative

proposal to review the

electoral framework and

add new contributions

from civil society aiming

at bridging the outcome

level, contribute to a

reform on the present

framework that would

ensure that “a broadly

accepted (legal and

institutional) electoral

framework by the main

political actors (political

parties and civil society

organizations) has been

in place. Main activities

towards this outcome

are to be carried out

Level of

consensus (three

level scale)

around the

reliability of the

electoral process

and results (as

reported in the

final statement of

the Constitutional

Council) by the

contestant

political parties);

Among the

contestant

political

parties 29

out of 30

did not

endorse the

2013 and

2014

election

process and

results as

being

reliable.

Among

the

contesta

nt

political

parties

29 out of

30 did

not

endorse

the 2013

and 2014

- At least the 3 main

political parties;

26 In all electoral processes since 1999, we had some observers that never declared or stated that the elections were “fair and transparent”. Some say that the irregularities observed were not enough to alter the results. Others used different wording but not a clear statement. This is something that partners have interest to monitor, considering it relevant.

74

Frelimo

party

declared it

as being

reliable ;

election

process

and

results as

being

reliable.

Frelimo

party

declared

it as

being

reliable27;

along 2016.

Diakonia 2b) - The Public policy

development process is politically

and socially inclusive and

participatory;

# of political

parties

participating in

political debate

and electoral

process;

Political

parties - 30

political

parties out

of 61 and 14

coalitions

have been

registered

for the last

electoral

process. But

3 (Frelimo,

Renamo

and MDM)

are the

ones active

in political

debate;

-10 -15 Political profile reports

and government

website;

There was some

openness from

government institutions

for participation and

engagement of civil

society organizations on

services delivered (e.g.

education, health care,

SRHR) public policy

development and

implementation process.

This participation tends

to be institutionalized in

consultative and

participations forums

such as:

✓ CNAC (National

Council for the

27 We see a challenge for partners to have access to information as suggested: in all 51 municipalities, 10 province assemblies.

75

level of

participation

(three level

scale) of

vulnerable

groups (women,

youth, children,

disabled, poor’s

and HIV positive

people) in

political debate

and influence;

Women –

medium

Youth –

medium

Children –

low

Disabled

people –

low

Poor’s – low

PLW HIV-

AIDS –

medium

Medium

Medium

Low

Low

Low

Medium

- High

- High

- Medium

- Medium

- Medium

- High

Analytical studies,

evaluations and reports

from different sources:

Gov, UNDP, World Bank,

Advance of

Child Rights)

phased out in

2015 and

substituted by a

broader council-

CNAS – reported

by Rede da

Criança and

Rede CAME;

✓ Development

Observatories –

reported by all

partners;

The new participatory

mechanism reported to

2015 was:

✓ CNAS (National

Council of Social

Action) this has

been

established in

2015 and is an

aggregation of

different councils

(child

advancement

council, women

advancement

council, elderly

# of formal

participatory

policy dialog

frameworks,

participated by

sub-programme

partners,

extended to

province levels28;

1. CNAC-

Conselho

Nacional

da Criança;

1.. Child

observatory

– bill

proposal;

1. RARA –

Reunião

Annual de

Revisão do

3 6 Assessment studies and

reports of political

participation;

28This means that the POs of national outreach will be accessed also at provincial level, by the work of their delegations, member´s organizations or focal points.

76

Sector da

Educação

advancement

council etc.).

CSO´s partners

working on

child´s rights

(ACAMO, Rede

da Criança REDE

CAME, and

ACABE) to claim

that the decision

of merging all

these councils in

one was not

participatory

and has

reduced the

number of

representation of

civil society

organizations in

the consultative

forum. To

exemplify, Rede

da Criança

reported that

CNAS child rights

organizations

used to be

represented by 7

organizations but

in the new CNAS

framework the

number has

been reduced

77

to only two

representations.

There are positive reports

from partners indicating

that “duty bearers have

included rights holder’s

claims and concerns

regarding inclusive assess

to justice, political

participation, education,

health, SRHR, social

service, into the policy

and governance

agenda”. besides text

above, regarding new

policy and legal

frameworks in debate or

approved by the

parliaments such as:

✓ The approval of

national strategy

against

premature

marriages –

partially

achieved with

advocacy

carried out by

AMMCJ,FORCO

M, MULEIDE,

Rede da

Criança, Rede

78

CAME (national

level), Othoko

and ACABE

(Niassa), and

Amudza

(Mocuba,

Zambézia).

✓ The debate on

inclusive and

rehabilitative

education for

people with

disabilities –

partly approved

with the actions

of ACAMO

79

8.4. CSO´S CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

29 Results Framework as in Overarching Proposal Version 19th February 2015. 30 All baseline figures refer to the cumulative status at end-AGIR I 31 POs in this framework refer to partners receiving core support from one of the four intermediaries 32 Diak; 100% (12/12); IBIS; 84% (11/13); Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE:84% (11/13) 33 Diak; 83% (10/12); IBIS; 90% (12/13) Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE: 100% (13/13) 34 Diak; 17 % (2/12); IBIS; 16 % (2/13); Oxfam 30 % (7/22); WE 23 % (3/13)

Theme 6: CSO´s Capacity Development29

Long-term Outcome 5 (for all IPOs): POs are Effective and Sustainable Agents of Transformational Change

Objectively verifiable

indicators

Baseline30

(Jan 2015)

Target Means of verification

Status by End of 2015

Mid-term

(Dec 2017)

End-line

(Dec 2020)

Bridging

Outcomes

(in bold)

and Outputs

(below)

5.1 POs31 are considered

democratic, well governed,

legitimate by their members

and support base,

accountable and apply

strong management

practices

% of POs with approved

strategic and operational

plans

94 %

(56/59)

100% (X/X) 100% (X/X) POs Annual Plans and

Reports

100% (59/59)

% of POs holding regular

(annual) general meetings

according to the frequency

in their statutes

94 %

(56/59)

95% (X/X)

100% (X/X) General Assemblies

minutes

96% (57/59)32

% of POs with unqualified

audit reports

69% (41/59) 80% (X/X) 90% (X/X) POs Audit Reports;

IPOs staff monitoring visit

reports

88% (51/59)33

% of POs that produce and

share consolidated plans

and reports through their

website

20 %

(12/59)

70% (X/X) 100% (X/X) POs websites 23% (14/59)34

80

35 Diak: 17 % (2/12) (FORCOM, OTHOKO); IBIS: 31 % (4/13) (ACDH; OAM; KUKUMBI; Solidariedade); Oxfam: 59 % (13/22) (AMME, NAFEZA, PNDH, N'WETI, LAMBDA, ESTAMOS, FACILIDADE, AKILIZETHO, FM, WLSA, CIP, JOINT, HOPEM); WE 38 % (5/13) (OMR, AENA, AMPCM, ORAM, Udeba-Lab) 36 Diak: 42 % (5/12) (ACAMO, CEDE, OE, FORCOM, MULEIDE); IBIS: 100 % (13/13); Oxfam: 64 % (14/22) (WLSA, CIP, GMD, HOPEM, SA, N'WETI, Facilidade, Akilizetho, JOINT, AMME, NAFEZA, PNDH, ESTAMOS, LAMBDA); WE: 100 % (13/13 37 The audit reports are sometimes not delivered in time, but due to reasons beyond the control of partners 38 Diak: 50% (6/12); IBIS; 92 % (12/13) Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE; 100% (13/13) 39 Diak; 41% (5/12) IBIS; 100% (13/13); Oxfam; 100% (22/22); WE: 100% (13/13)

% of PO’s with at least 50% of

members paying quotas

33 %

(20/59)

50 % (X/X) 70 % (X/X) PO Reports 38 % (23/59)35

% of POs that deliver reports

(narrative, financial and

audit) within the deadline

73 %

(43/59)

95 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) Intermediary records and

assessments of reports

91 % (54/59)3637

5.1.1 POs capacity

strengthened in good

governance of their

organizations

% POs underwent capacity

building in good governance

of their organizations

94 %

(56/59)

Annual: 100

% (X/X)

Cumulative:

100 % (X/X)

Annual: 100 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100 % (X/X)

Capacity building

assessments; 5C

assessment

Annual: 89 % (53/59)38

Cumulative: 94 %

(56/59)

5.1.2 POs internal

governance, accountability

and transparency

strengthened

% of social organs of all POs

actors meet as per regularity

specified in their statues

94 %

(56/59)

100 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) General Assemblies

minutes; monitoring visit

reports;

Reports of internal

meetings of social organs.

100% (59/59)

% of partners whose reports

(narrative, financial and

audit) were approved by the

general assembly

98 %

(58/59)

100 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) General Assemblies

minutes; Monitoring visit

reports;

Reports of internal

meetings of social organs.

100% (59/59)

5.1.3: POs capacity

strengthened in financial,

HRM and results-based

management

%POs underwent capacity

building in financial, HRM,

and RBM management

94 %

(56/59)

Annual: 100

% (X/X)

Cumulative:

100 % (X/X)

Annual: 100 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100 % (X/X)

Capacity building

assessments; 5C

assessment, FSA reports

Annual: 88 % (52/59)39

Cumulative: 94 %

81

40 Averages per intermediary: Diak: 55 %, IBIS: 64%; Oxfam 56 %; WE 30 % 41 Averages per intermediary: Diak: 64,5 %, IBIS: 74 %; Oxfam 59 %; WE 33,5 % 42 Diak: 100 % (12/12), IBIS; 100 % (13/13) Oxfam: 59 % (13/22) (SA, Akilizetho, AMME, Facilidade, FM, GMD, Hopem, Lambda, N´weti, NAFEZA, PNDH, PSCM-PS, WLSA); WE 100 % (13/13) 43 Diak; 2 (16%) IBIS; 4 (25 %) Oxfam; 22 (100%); WE: 13 (100 %) 44 Diak: 0,8 % (1/12) (CESC); IBIS: 0%; Oxfam: 36 % (8/22) (CIP, Facilidade, FM, N´weti, WLSA, JOINT, SA, Wadzafica) WE 0,7 %(1/13) (CTV) 45Diak; 75 % (9/12) (AMMCJ, Rede Came, CEDE, Muleide, Othoko, CESC, Forcom, Acabe, PJ); IBIS 62 % (8/13) (ACDH, AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, KUKUMBI, GDI; OAM); OXFAM 45 % (10/22) (WLSA, HOPEM, AMME, NAFEZA, SA, GMD, PNDH, FACILIDADE, FM, Nweti); WE 69 % (9/13) (AAAJC, AENA, ABIODES, CTV, JA, Livaningo, ORAM, UNAC, UPCT) 46 Diak:50 % (6/12) (Muleide, AMMCJ, PJ, R. CAME, NANA, FORCOM) IBIS: 62 % (8/13) (ACDH, AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, KUKUMBI, GDI; OAM); Oxfam: 91 % (20/22) (all except CEMO and CIP); WE: 46 % (6/13) (AENA, CTV, ORAM, Abiodes, UNAC, Livaningo)

POs average % dependency

of AGIR

51%40 45 % 30 % Financial reports 58 % 41

% of POs with M&E systems in

place

86 %

(51/59)

90 % (X/X) 100%( X/X) POs Annual Plans and

Reports, M&E meeting

minutes

86 % (51/59)42

5.1.4 Members participate in

strategic planning exercise

% POs that include members

in their strategic planning

process

94 %

(56/59)

100 % (X/X) 100 % (X/X) POs Annual Plans and

Reports, minutes

100% (59/59)

5.1.5 POs strengthened to

mainstream environment

and climate change in their

strategic and operational

plans

% of POs that include

mainstream environment

and climate change in their

strategic and operational

plans and internal

documents

30 %

(18/59)

Annual: 15 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

60% (X/X)

Annual: 15 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100% (X/X)

Reports of capacity

building assessments

Annual: 39 % (23/59)

Cumulative: 69 %

(41/59)43

5.1.6 Partners have their anti-

corruption policies and

implement them

% of POs that have internal

anti-corruption policies in

place

0,01 %

(1/59)

Annual: 10 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

30 % (X/X)

Annual: 10 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

90% (X/X)

POs Anti-corruption

Internal Policies

17 % (10/59)44

5.2 Strengthened gender

mainstreaming among AGIR

POs at programme and

activity level, as well as in

the work place

% of POs that have gender

equality policies formulated

75% (44/59) Annual: 10 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

75% (X/X)

Annual: 10 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100% (X/X)

POs Gender Internal

Policies

Reports of capacity

building assessments

Annual: 62% (37/59) 45

Cumulative: 62% (37/59)

% of partners doing gender

analysis in project or

programme strategic

69 %

(41/59)

Annual: 10 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

Annual: 10 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

Reports of capacity

building assessments

Annual: 67 % (40/59)46

Cumulative: 67 %

(40/59)

82

47 Diak: 33% (4/12) (Muleide, AMMCJ, FORCOM, PJ); IBIS 0 %; Oxfam 18 % (4/22) (WLSA, FM, LAMBDA, HOPEM); WE 23 % (3/13) (UNAC, ORAM, CTV) 48 Diak 40% (5/12); IBIS 46% (6/13); Oxfam 50% (11/22); WE 46% (6/13) 49 Activity was not carried out in 2015 50 While some partners have gender indicators other, the majority provide gender desegregated information and very few effectively do gender analyses. 51 UNAC (WE) 52 Activity was not carried out in 2015

documents 75% (X/X) 100% (X/X)

% of POs involved in regional

initiatives on gender issues

22% (13/59) 30% (X/X) 50% (X/X) Gender Link reports

SADC gender Protocol

Barometer

19% (11/59) 47

% of partners with at least

50% of women working and

represented in leadership

decision- making positions

67 %

(40/59)

70% (X/X) 90% (X/X) Annual plans and report 45% (27/59)48

5.2.1 AGIR POs applying

tools to address and monitor

progress in regard to

promoting gender equality

and justice and women’s

empowerment

% of partners trained on

developing gender

indicators, gender

disaggregation and gender

analysis

0% (0/59) Annual: 60%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

70 % (X/X)

Annual: 100%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100 % (X/X)

IPO monitoring reports 0% 49

% of partners applying

gender indicators, gender

disaggregation and gender

analysis

0% (0/59) 60% (X/X) 80%(X/X) POs Annual reports

POs Annual Plans

0%50

% of partners trained in the

system for equitable

allocation of funds

methodology (FRAS)

0,01 %

(151/59)

Annual: 80%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

81 %

Annual: 19 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100% (X/X)

Budget, Financial reports Annual 2015: 0% (0/59)52

Cumulative: 0,01 %

(1/59)

% of partners implementing

the system for equitable

allocation of funds

methodology (FRAS)

0,01 %

(1/59)

Annual: 10%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

30% (X/X)

Annual: 10%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

60% (X/X)

POs Annual reports

POs Annual Plans

Annual 2015: 0% (0/59)

Cumulative: 0,01 %

(1/59)

% of partners implementing

the system for equitable

allocation of funds

0,16%

(1/59)

Annual: 5%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

Annual: 5%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

Budget and financial

reports

Annual 2015: 0% (0/59)

Cumulative: 0,16 %

(1/59)

83

53 Those events were: Rural women Fair (ORAM), International Women day (WLSA/FM), Rural Women’s National Conference (Forum Mulher), National Conference on the SADC Gender Protocol (FM ans WLSA) ;1 position paper against gender based violence among PO in Maputo (MULEIDE); 2 workshops : one on Law of Succession regarding women position in heritage and the other) discussed Family Law on union fact regulation (AAMCJ) 54 Diak: 1 (National Strategy on Prevention of Early Marriage); IBIS: 2 (Aprovação da Lei do Direito à Informação em 2014 & Regulamentação da Lei do Direito à Informação; Oxfam 3 (PENIV, National Strategy on Prevention of Early Marriage, Set Up of CECAP) WE: 2 (Prosavana, Terra Segura) 55 No staff swapping occured in 2015 56 Diak 42% (5/12); IBIS 66% (9/13); Oxfam 53% (12/22); WE 46 % (6/13) 57 Diak: 42% (5/12); IBIS: 58% (7/13); OXFAM: 50% (11/22); WE: 38% (5/13) 58 Diak: 33 % (4/12) (ACABE, ADEMUM, AMUDZA, NANA) IBIS: 62 % (8/13) (ACDH, AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, KUKUMBI, GDI, Sekelekani) Oxfam: 90 % (20/22) WE: 100 % (13/13)

methodology (FRAS) that

reach the 50 % goal

20% (X/X) 40% (X/X)

5.2.2 Coordination between

AGIR POs on gender-

sensitive advocacy and

dialogue strengthened

# of events/position papers

/seminars/campaigns in

gender are held by partners

per year

3/year 3/year 3/year Annual reports, position

papers

7 events53

# of policy changes with

contribution from CSO´s

10 Annual: 5

Cumulative:

15

Annual: 5

Cumulative:

25

POs Annual reports

Reports of the events

Annual: 854

Cumulative: 18

# of staff swapping in

between the partners

10 Annual: 10

Cumulative:

30

Annual: 10

Cumulative:

30

Annual reports Annual: 055

Cumulative: 10

5.3 AGIR partners upscale

HIV/AIDS interventions

internally & externally and

have the capacity to

provide an effective

response to the right holders

% of POs that have HIV/AIDS

policies formulated

50% (30/59) 80% (X/X) 90% (X/X) POs HIV Internal Policies

Reports of capacity

building assessments

50% (30/59)56

% of POs mainstreaming

internally and externally

HIV/AIDS issues

45% (27/59) 50% (X/X) 75% (X/X) Annual report and plans 45% (27/59)57

5.3.1 POs with capacity to

mainstream HIV/AIDS

% of POs trained on how to

mainstream internally &

externally HIV/AIDS

86 %

(51/59)

Annual: 60%

(X/X)

Cumulative:

70 % (X/X)

Annual 30 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

100% (X/X)

POs HIV Internal Policies

Reports of capacity

building assessments

Annual: 76% (45/59)58

Cumulative: 85 %

(51/59)

84

59 # rather than % here since it is not applicable for all AGIR partner 60 Diak: 33 % (4/12) (MULEIDE, AMMCJ, REDE DA CRIANÇA, OTHOKO); IBIS; 0, 7 % (1/13) (KUKUMBI); Oxfam: 32 % (7/22) (RENSIDA, N'weti, Hopem, Lambda, FM, WLSA, ESTAMOS); WE: 0 % (n/a) 61 The policies revised and/or adopted are: PENIV and the National Strategy on Prevention from and Fight Against Early Marriage 62 Activity not carried out in in 2015 63 Diak: 5 (Muleide, Nana, Othoko, Forcom, PJ); IBIS: 2 - (KUKUMBI e GDI); Oxfam: 7 (RENSIDA, N'weti, Hopem, Lambda, FM, WLSA, ESTAMOS) WE: 0 64 The programs are: Tua Cena (N’weti – National coverage), Global Fund (Lambda – Maputo City, Beira, Nampula), “Youth Today, Time to Act” (PJ – Maputo) 65 The events were: Health Sector Partners’ Health Fair; 2015 Consultative Meeting-side Health Fair; campaign against early marriage; campaign to sensitize woman in relation to prevention and treatment of obstetric fistula

5.3.2 POs are innovative,

creative and work in

strategic partnerships on

HIV/AIDS

#59 of POs engaged in

strategic partnerships and

networks with HIV/AIDS

specialized organizations

12 15 15 Annual report and plans 1260

5.4 POs are trained on SRHR

and influence for better

quality service on SRHRs for

women, men, girls and boys

# of SRHR related public

policies revised and/or

adopted

1 Annual: 1

Cumulative:

3

Annual: 1

Cumulative: 5

Annual reports plans Annual: 261

Cumulative: 3

5.4.1 POs strengthened on

SRHR and including it in their

plans

# of training sessions carried

out in SRHR

0 Annual: 1

Cumulative:

1

Annual: 0

Cumulative 2

Training reports Annual: 062

# of relevant partners that

include SRHR in their plans

14 Annual: 2

Cumulative:

16

Annual: 1

Cumulative:

19

POs Strategic and

operational plans

1463

5.4.2 POs and rights holders

have access to information

on SRHR

# of programs on

comprehensive SRHR

information to teenagers and

youth (girls and boys)

4 15 30 Annual reports & plans 464

# of events/seminars held

promoting SRHR-related

issues

2 10 20 Annual reports & plans 465

85

66 Prosavana (Oxfam partners in Nampula, Akilizetho and Falicidade),, Climate Change/ COP 21 (Livaningo, JA!) Campaign on human rights; 16 activism days (Forum Mulher, WLSA, Lambda, Joint, Hopem); campaign against trial of human right defenders (Castelo Branco and Fernando Banze) (Joint and WLSA),; campaign against Early marriage (WLSA, Lambda, Hopem, FM, all under SRHR Network); campaign for the approval of the RTIL By-law (Regulamento) (Sekelekani) 67 Diak: 75 % (9/12) (Forcom, ACAMO, AMMCJ, CESC, R. CAME, R.Criança, PJ,CEDE, Muleide); IBIS: 69 % (9/13) (AMCS, CAICC, CEC, CODD, IESE, KUKUMBI, GDI, OAM, Sekelekani); Oxfam: 32 % (7/22) (WLSA, PSCM-PS, Lambda, Nweti, CIP, HOPEM, JOINT); WE: 85 % (11/13) (UPCT; AMA; AJC; AMPCM; AENA;CTV; JA!; Livaningo; OMR; ORAM; UNAC) 68 Diak: 33 % (4/12) (PJ, R. Criança, AMMCJ, MULEIDE); IBIS: 0,7 % (1/13) (Sekelekani); Oxfam: 18 % (4/22) (WLSA, CIP, JOINT, HOPEM); WE: 23 % (3/13) (UNAC, Livaningo, ORAM)

5.5 POs are effective,

creative, dynamic, work in

networks and are

resourceful enough to

accomplish their mission

and vision using innovative

technical (websites & social

media) tools in their

interventions

# of joint public campaigns

organized by POs

12 Annual: 10

Cumulative:

30

Annual: 10

Cumulative:

60

POs annual plans and

reports

Annual: 866

Cumulative: 20

# of national and regional

linkages and networks

created among POs

11 Annual: 5

Cumulative:

20

Annual: 3

Cumulative:

30

POs annual plans and

reports

Annual: 4

Cumulative: 19

# of POs thematic

knowledge improved by

sharing their experience

(lesson leaning and best

practice) between each

other

17 Annual: 5

Cumulative:

30

Annual: 5

Cumulative:

45

Reports of experience

exchange reports

Annual: 6

Cumulative: 23

# of position papers released 25 Annual: 25

Cumulative:

100

Annual: 25

Cumulative:

175

Newspaper cuts Annual: 62

Cumulative: 87

% of POs that have functional

websites

50% (29/59) 60% (X/X) 75% (X/X) POs webpages 61% (36/59)67

% of POs activist networks to

stage their advocacy

20% (12/59) Annual: 5 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

30 % (X/X)

Annual: 3 %

(X/X)

Cumulative:

45 % (X/X)

POs activists network

register; POs activists

feeding communications;

POs databases

Annual: 20% (12/59)68

Cumulative: 20% (12/59)

86

69 Diak: 75 % (9/12) (ACAMO, ACABE, AMMCJ, MULEIDE,FORCOM, CESC, R.CAME, R.CRIANÇA, PJ); IBIS: 38 % (5/13) (CAICC, CODD IESE, KUKUMBI, OAM, Sekelekani); Oxfam: 32% (7/22) (WLSA, PSCM-PS, Lambda, Nweti, CIP, HOPEM, JOINT) WE: 100 % (13/13) 70 All applicable/that have delegations 71 IESE, CIP, Fórum Mulher, GMD, CTV, OMR 72 Diak: 0 % ; IBIS: 0,7 % (1/13) (IESE); Oxfam: 18 % (4/22) (CIP, FM, GMD, Estamos); WE: 15 % (2/13) (CTV, OMR) 73 Diak: 42 % (5/12) (AMMCJ, FORCOM,R. CAME, CESC, Muleide); IBIS: 23 % (3/13) (IESE, KUKUMBI, Sekelekani); Oxfam: 27 % (6/22) (CIP, N´weti, GMD, LAMBDA, FM, HOPEM); WE: 54 % (7/13) (AAAJC, AENA, UNAC, CTV, Livaningo, ORAM, JA!)

% of partner POs that use

social media (Facebook,

twitter, Google, Instagram,

blogs) to implement their

advocacy and disseminate

their results

52 %

(31/59)

70% (X/X) 90% (X/X) POs social media pages 57% (34/59)69

5.5.1 Improved connections

between POs and their

provincial delegations

% of core funding contracts

signed with POs with clauses

on support to provincial

branches

13, 5 %

(8/59)

72 % (X/X)

72 % (X/X) Contracts between IPOs

and partners

72% (42/59)70

% of PO’s with delegations

that transfer part of the fund

to their provincial

delegations

43 %

(18/42)

50 % (X/X)

60 % (X/X) POS budget

POs financial and

narrative reports

55% (23/42)

% of POs with delegations

that transfer funds that reach

the goal of 30 %

0 % (0/42) 5 % (X/X) 10 % (X/X) POS budget

POs financial and

narrative reports

0 % (0/42)

5.6 POs benefit from

improved alignment

between donors and

application of “good

donorship” principles

% of partners that have

basket funds

10 %

(671/59)

15 % (X/X) 20 % (X/X) Memorandum of

Understanding

12 % (7/59)72

% of partners that have more

than 4 donors

66 %

(39/59)

50 % (X/X) 70 % (X/X) Financial reports 12 % (7/59)73

87

74 Diak: 0,8 % (1/12) (FORCOM); IBIS: 23 % (3/13) (IESE, Kukumbi, OAM); Oxfam: 23 % (5/22) (CIP, GMD, FM, FTI, PSCM-PS); WE: 31 % (4/13) (UNAC, Livaningo, CTV, OMR) 75 Diak: 0, 8 % (1/12) (LDH); IBIS: 38 % (5/13) (CAICC; IESE, OAM; KUKUMBI; SEKELEKANI); OXFAM 100 % (22/22); WE 46 %(6/13) (OMR, JA!, CTV, Udeba-Lab, Abiodes, AENA) 76 This number is for 2013. 6 Planning & Reporting, 5 Gender 77 At least 4 per group. The groups are: Financial, Planning & reporting, Gender and Capacity building (new 2015) 78 4 financial, 4 planning and reporting, 4 gender 79 Consultative Meeting (AGIR PARTNERs ANNUAL MEETING), Health Fair

% of POs that benefit from

regular (at least one per

semester) donor meetings

22% (13/59) 50% (X/X) 75% (X/X) Donor meeting minutes 20% (12/59)74

# of partners producing only

one plan/budget and reports

to their donors

58 %

(34/59)

65 % (X/X) 75 % (X/X) POs plans and reports 58 % (34/59)75

5.7 The intermediate (IPOs)

increase coordination

between themselves

# of ICC´s realized over the

year

4 4/year 4/year Meeting reports 3

# of technical group

meetings held

1176 Annual:

16/year77

Cumulative:

55

Annual:

16/year

Cumulative:

90

Minutes and reports Annual: 1278

Cumulative: 23

# joint public events annually

and jointly held by the IPOs

7 Annual: 3

Cumulative:

15

Annual: 3

Cumulative:

18

Reports Annual: 279

Cumulative: 9

88

8.5. CRONOGRAMA DE ACTIVIDADES DAS IPOs (IBIS, DIAKONIA, OXFAM E WE)] PARA 2015

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

Coordenação entre as

intermediárias/IPOs

Intermediárias/

IPOs

aumentam a

coordenação

entre si

Estabelecidos e

implementados

mecanismos

funcionais de

coordenação

entre as

intermediárias

Realizar 4 sessões do Comité de

Coordenação das

intermediárias/IPOs (ICC)

X X X X Intermediárias/IP

Os

ICCs realizados

conforme o

planificado.

Actualizar o Quadro de Resultados

(Results Framework) da Proposta

Conjunta (Overarching) do AGIR II

X X Intermediárias Processo iniciado, mas

ainda por ser

concluído (face às

notas dos doadores,

do primeiro trimestre

de 2016).

Finalização do Overarching

Proposal do AGIR II, depois dos

últimos comentários dos Doadores

X Intermediárias/IP

Os

Processo iniciado, mas

ainda por ser

concluído (face às

notas dos doadores,

do primeiro trimestre

de 2016).

Realizar encontros dos grupos

técnicos

(Planificação/Monitoria/Resultados,

Género, Finanças)

X X X X Grupos Técnicos

das

intermediárias/IP

Os

Os encontros foram

realizados, sempre

que se julgou

necessário. Os

atinentes à

Monitoria/Resultados

não foram realizados

conforme se previa,

pela demora na

contratação do

overarching oficial de

monitoria.

89

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

Finalise the common AGIR criteria

on small funding mechanisms

X ICC Finalizado, mas

somente no terceiro

trimestre, devido às

aturadas discussões

entre as IPOs e aos

comentários dos

doadores.

Develop joint strategy on

sustainability, including exit and

weaning principles and procedures

X ICC Não iniciado, por

conta do processo de

fecho do AGIR I e do

arranque do AGIR II.

Remarcado para o

primeiro semestre de

2016.

Desenvolvida e

mantida a

identidade e

imagem pública

do programa

AGIR

Contratar um Assessor de

Comunicação das Intermediárias

X Intermediárias/IP

Os

Com a demora no

processo de

aprovação do AGIR,

tal acabou iniciando

somente no IV

trimestre de 2015, pelo

que foi replanificado

para conclusão no

primeiro trimestre de

2016.

Realizar o Partner Satisfaction Test X Intermediárias/IP

Os, com apoio

de Consultor(a)

Externo(a)

Discussões sobre

‘como proceder’,

alinhando o approach

do AGIR aos das IPOs,

enquanto entidades

independentes,

acabaram

concorrendo para

que o processo fosse

somente iniciado no

90

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

IV trimestre e

conclusão

reprogramada para I

semestre de 2016.

Realizar Fórum Consultivo Anual do

AGIR

X Intermediárias/IP

Os

Realizado conforme

planificado,

nomeadamente na

segunda metade de

Outubro, em

Quelimane, Zambézia.

Pela primeira vez, o

Fórum Consultivo

Anual foi realizado

back-to-back com

outro evento (a Feira

de Saúde), que juntou

rights-holders e duty

bearers.

Produzir e distribuir newsletter do

Programa AGIR (PlataformAGIR)

X X X X Intermediárias/IP

Os

No lugar de quatro

edições, foram

produzidas e

distribuídas somente

três. Uma falha na

coordenação, aliada

ao atraso verificado

na contratação do

overarching oficial de

comunicação,

concorreu para o

efeito.

Criação do website do AGIR X Intermediárias/IP

Os

O processo acabou se

alastrando até ao final

do ano de 2015, sem

que fosse concluso. As

discussões sobre que

91

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

tipo de website em

concreto (com apoio

de especialistas)

acabaram se

lastrando por demais,

ao que se ajuntou a

necessidade de

acertos orçamentais

por parte das IPOs,

por os custos reais

terem superado os

que tinham sido

orçados. Finalização

remarcada, assim,

para o primeiro

semestre de 2016.

Disseminar a brochura dos

resultados do Programa AGIR I

X X Intermediárias/IP

Os

As brochuras foram

produzidas e

disseminadas.

Formações/Activi

dades Conjuntas

Feira de Saúde X Intermediárias/IP

Os, sob a

coordenação

do Grupo de

Género

Realizada na segunda

metade de Outubro,

back-to-back com o

Fórum Consultivo

Anual do AGIR, em

Quelimane, Zambézia.

Formação em Género e HIV X X Intermediárias/IP

Os, sob a

coordenação

do Grupo de

Género

Tendo em conta que

os POs se achavam

em posições diversas

(exemplo: umas com

políticas relevantes,

outras sem políticas,

etc.), o Grupo Técnico

discutiu a

harmonização das

intervenções, após o

92

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

que cada IPO assistiu

os POs sob sua

alçada. Em 2016, será

oferecido um

treinamento

abrangente/moldes

clássicos, e mais

especializado

[metodologia do FRAS

(Fair Resource

Allocation System).

Formação em Advocacia para

Mudança/Policy Dialogue

X Intermediárias/IP

Os

Não realizada, por

conta o início efectivo

tardio do AGIR II, mais

a demora na

contratação do

overarching oficial de

comunicação do

AGIR.

Balanço Anual do Programa X Intermediárias/IP

Os

Realizado por todas as

IPOs, com seus POs,

no quadro do

princípio de mutual

accountability e

como parte dos seus

[IPOs] sistemas de

gestão de parcerias e

prestação de contas.

Por outro lado, as IPOs

mantiveram, com oa

doadores do AGIR

(Dezembro de 2015), o

Annual Review

Meeting, no qual

foram abordadas

93

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

questões do domínio

overarching do AGIR.

As actividades

e serviços do

programa são

de boa

qualidade e

os programas

são cost-

efficient

Desenvolvido e

mantidos

mecanismos de

coordenação do

programa com

outras iniciativas e

instituições do

governo

Continuação do trabalho com

outros mecanismos (IREX, KEPA,

DIALOGO, CEP, MASC e CAP-

FHI360, OSISA) para a conclusão e

disseminação dos resultados do

estudo sobre sustentabilidade

X X Intermediárias/IP

Os, com

liderança [onde

aplicável] da

Oxfam e da

Diakonia

Realizado. Isso incluiu

a realização de 3

mesas-redondas e 1

evento de

Desenvolvimento

Profissional para a

disseminação de 3

Estudos sobre o apoio

da Sociedade Civil:

Estudo sobre

Sustentabilidade das

OSCs no qual também

participaram a

Diakonia e Oxfam,

Road Map das OSCs

pela EU; e Enabling

Environment pela

JOINT e CIVICUS

Assinados MoU com relevantes duty

bearers e/ou parceiros estratégicos

(media, outros mecanismos de

apoio à sociedade civil, etc.).

X X IPOs Parte significativa dos

MoUs com relevantes

duty bearers e entes

estratégicos (media)

foram firmados em

2015 [exemplos:

Ministério do Género,

Criança e Acção

Social; Ministério de

Ciência e Tecnologia,

Ensino Superior e

Técnico Profissional;

Grupo SOICO;

Associação Nacional

dos Municípios

(ANAM); governos

94

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

províncias da

Zambézia e de

Nampula, etc.] ,

sendo que os não

estabelecidos

naquele ano

(exemplo: com os

governos provinciais

de Tete e Cabo

Delgado e com os

Ministérios da

Administração Estatal

e Função Pública e da

Educação e

Desenvolvimento

Humano) sê-lo-ão em

2016.

Sistemas de

Monitoria e

Controlo de

Qualidade do

Trabalho

Estabelecidos

Relatórios das

visitas de

monitoria.

Contratação de um Oficial de

Monitoria e Avaliação das

Intermediárias/IPOs

X Intermediárias/IP

Os. Oxfam na

liderança

Processo iniciado

somente no IV

trimestre, tendo a

conclusão sido

reprogramada para o

I trimestre de 2016.

Atraso se deveu aos

desafios atinentes ao

arranque efectivo

demorado do AGIR II

e ao processo de

fecho do AGIR I.

Elaboração da Linha de Base

Conjunta

X X Intermediárias/IP

Os, sob a

coordenação

dos Grupos

Técnicos

Não-aprovação

formal/definitiva dos

proposals dalgumas

IPOs concorreu para

que tal não fosse

materialmente

possível em 2015.

95

ÁREA DE COORDENAÇÃO/OBJECTIVO ESPECÍFICO

OUTCOME DELIVERABLE/OUTPUTS

ACTIVIDADES ANO 2015

TRIMESTRE RESPONSABILIDADE

NOTAS SOBRE O PLANIFICADO VERSUS REALIZADO

T1 T2 T3 T4

Actividade

reprogramada para o

primeiro semestre de

2016, com o apoio de

especialistas externos.

Desenho e actualização dos Planos

de Acção de seguimento das

recomendações das auditorias e

avaliação institucional (Moore

Stephens)

X X X X IPOs Acção

tempestivamente

atendida pelas IPOs,

em coordenação

com os doadores do

AGIR, por via da EoS

(lead donor).

Visitas de monitoria aos POs X X X X IPOs No geral, todas as

IPOs realizaram as

visitas de monitoria

conforme planificado

e em linha com os

seus sistemas de

gestão de parcerias.

As [IPOs] que o

fizeram parcialmente,

relevantes motivos se

acham insertos nos

seus relatórios anuais

[2015] individuais.

96

8.6. LIST OF POS AND FUNDS TO POS IN 2015

IBIS Partner organization

Focus Area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)

Disbursements 2015

%

first disbursement

1st semester 2nd semester

1 ACDH · Promotion of citizenship, human rights 1,990,190 423,627 1,431,121 93% 28/01/2015

2 AMCS · Media Sector(women journalists) 1,204,819 273,594 914,799 99% 28/01/2015

3 CAICC · Media sector (Strengthen the network of Community ICT for Good Governance)

2,484,609 596,582 1,687,450 92%

28/01/2015

4 CEC · Communication and Policy; Gender and Human Rights;

1,597,089 378,22 1,142,765 95%

28/01/2015

5 CESAB · environment and access to information 367,977 318,856 - 87% 02/02/2015

6 CODD · Promotion of citizenship, human rights, environment and access to information

1,204,819 219,213 906,995 93%

02/02/2015

7 GDI · Transparency and Duty Bearers Accountability; 1,987,687 745,039 1,127,813 94% 28/01/2015

· strengthening of local governance

8 IESE · Transparency and Duty Bearers Accountability (Social, Political, Economy and Development)

1,863,457 - 2,124,222 114%

27/05/2015

9 KUKUMBI · Governance monitoring, natural disasters, HIV and Aids, education

2,236,148 847,22 1,248,975 94%

26/01/2015

97

10 MISA · Media sector (Governance and Democracy) - 203,221 629,086 #VALUE!

Direct Payments addressed by Ibis

11 OAM · Human Rights Based Organization(quality and coverage of public services)

2,069,438 342,936 1,381,485 83%

28/01/2015

12 SEKELEKANI · Democracy and Governance 2,109,120 455,848 1,740,958

104%

19/01/2015

· Mass Media and ICTs

· Natural Resources and Environment

13 Solidariedade Moz

· Governance and Extractive Industry 746,13 - 436,965 59%

10/08/2015

· Climate Change

TOTAL 19,861,483 4,804,356 14,772,634 99%

WE EFFECT Partner organization

Focus Area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)

Disbursements 2015

1st semester 2nd semester

1 AAAJC · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

2 ABIODES · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 14/05/2015

· Environment and climate change

3 AENA · Land rights and NR 1,400,000.00 840,000.00 560,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

· Agriculture and right to food

· Environment and climate change

4 AMA · Land rights and NR 850,000.00 500,000.00 350,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

· Agriculture and right to food

· Environment and climate change

5 AMPCM · Agriculture and right to food 800,000.00 500,000.00 300,000.00 100% 14/05/2015

· Environment and climate change

6 CTV · Land rights and NR 2,100,000.00 1,400,000.00 700,000.00 100% 07/05/2015

· Environment and climate change

7 JA · Land rights and NR 2,100,000.00 1,400,000.00 700,000.00 100% 03/04/2015

98

· Environment and climate change

8 Livaningo · Land rights and NR 1,000,000.00 600,000.00 400,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

· Environment and climate change

9 OMR · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

· Agriculture and right to food

10 ORAM · Land rights and NR 1,600,000.00 900,000.00 700,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

· Agriculture and right to food

· Environment and climate change

11 UDEBA- LAB · Environment and climate change 1,025,000.00 600,000.00 425,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

12 UNAC · Land rights and NR 2,850,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,350,000.00 100% 31/03/2015

· Agriculture and right to food

13 UPCT · Land rights and NR 900,000.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 100% 16/04/2015

· Agriculture and right to food

TOTAL 17,325,000.00 10,240,000.00 7,085,000.00 100%

OXFAM Partner Organization

Focus area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)

Disbursements 2015

1st Semester 2nd Semester

Key partners cat A

1 CIP Budget monitoring, and tracking 5,296,746 2,276,701 3,027,726 100% 10/06/2015

2 WLSA Gender and SRHR 4,551,891 883,366 3,680,628 100% 17/04/2015

3 LAMBDA LGBTI and Gender and SRHR 4,138,083 673,428 3,487,578 101% 24/06/2015

4 Forum Mulher Gender inequality/ reduced GBV and and SRHR 4,965,699 2,519,245 2,466,406 100% 24/06/2015

5 Estamos Budget monitoring, and tracking, Social audits, CSCards, Basic Public Services (health, water)

2,241,662 0 3,861,040 172%

29/07/2016

6 NWETI Gender and SRHR 4,965,699 1,994,075 2,988,346 100% 19/06/2015

26,159,780 8,346,815 19,511,725 106%

99

Key partners cat B

7 AKILIZETHO Social audits, Community Score Cards 2,490,736 1,330,997 1,162,626 100% 29/06/2015

8 GMD Tax justice 1,868,052 1,145,740 1,336,217 133% 21/05/2015

9 RENSIDA PLHIV 1,903,518 1,158,840 756,398 101% 29/06/2015

10 HOPEM Gender inequality/ reduced GBV, SRHR 3,144,943 1,595,510 1,550,703 100% 19/06/2015

11 PNDH Human Rights 1,369,905 762,376 609,973 100% 19/06/2015

(non-discrimination/legal framework)

12 FACILIDADE Budget monitoring, and tracking, Social audits, CSCards, Basic Public Services (health, water)

1,494,442 0 1,443,876 97%

19/08/2015

13 RUTH Basic Public Services (public transport, water and sanitation)

1,245,368 0 0 0%

-

14 MAGARIRO Basic Public Services (public transport, water and sanitation)

1,655,233 1,679,474 0 101%

19/06/2015

15 AMME Gender inequality/ underlying causes, SRHR 1,245,368 0 1,232,624 99% 17/07/2015

16 NAFEZA Gender inequality/ underlying causes, SRHR 871,758 572,87 305,124 101% 24/06/2015

17,289,321 8,245,808 8,397,541 96%

Key partners cat C

17 JOINT Laws and international commitments 1,324,186 0 2,221,266 168% 29/07/2015

18 PSCM-PS Basic Public Services (social protection), Human Rights 2,069,041 1,190,338 884,314 100% 19/06/2015

(non-discrimination/legal framework) 29/06/2015

19 FTI Basic Public Services (social protection), Elderly people 1,241,425 629,804 617,38 100% 19/06/2015

20 WADZAFICA Gender inequality/ reduced GBV, SRHR 1,241,425 687,53 561,805 101% 24/06/2015

21 Sociedade Aberta

Social audits, CSCards, Complaint boxes, Basic Public Services (health, water)

996,294 606,532 396,62 101%

19/06/2015

22 CEMO social research 413,808 419,866 0 101% 29/07/2015

7,286,180 3,534,071 4,681,385 113%

100

TOTAL 50,735,281 20,126,693 32,590,651 104%

DIAKONIA Partner organization

Focus Area Total Budget 2015 ( SEK)

Disbursements 2015

1st semester 2nd semester

1 ACAMO · Human rights focused on people with special needs

2,385,000 1,192500 1,192500 100%

00-04-2015

2 FORCOM · Political and democratic participation 2,385,000

1,192,500

1,192500

94% 30-04-2015

· SRHR

3 LDH · Human rights 4,535,000

0

0 0%

NA · Inclusive citizenship

· Research

4 P. Juvenil · Youth rights and priorities 2,385,000

1,192,500

1,192,500 100%

08-04-2015

· SRHR

5 AMMCJ · Political advocacy 1,985,000

992,500

992,500 100%

14-04-2015 · Legal assistance for vulnerable groups

6 CEDE · Research, governance and democracy, human rights

2,004,891

992,500

1,012,391

100%

21-07-2015

· Conflict transformation,

· Civic education and electoral procedures

7 CESC · Monitoring of public policies 1,985,000 992,500 992,500 100% 18-04-2015

8 MULEIDE · Gender equality 2,118,884

992,500

1,126,384 100%

08-04-2015 · SRHR and HIV/AIDS

· Legal Assistance and dissemination of laws

9 Rede CAME · Rights of children and their welfare 1,985,000 992,500 992,500 100% 08-04-205

10 Rede da Criança · Rights of children and their welfare 2,012,326

992,500

992,500

100% 14-04-2015

11 AWEPA · Strengthening parliamentary democracy 1,685,000 0 0 100% NA

101

12 O. Eleitoral · Electoral processes, including voter registration, campaigns and the vote count, and civic education

1,685,000

421,250

605,132 61%

14-04-2015

13 ACABE · Monitoring of public policies and human rights. 650,000

325,000

325,000 100%

27-07-2015 · Education for young girls

· HIV and AIDS

14 NANA · Environment

650,000

325,000

325,000 100%

17-09-2015

· Health services (SRHR) and HIV/ AIDS

· Monitoring of public policies and human rights.

· Education and governance

15 OTHOKO · Monitoring of public policies and human rights. 717,809

325,000

392,809 100%

16-09-2015 · SRHR

· HIV and AIDS

16 AMUDZA · Rights of women and young girls 220,000

0

0 0%

NA · SRHR

· Community health

17 ADEMUM · Gender equality

110,000

0

0 0%

NA

· SRHR

· HEALTH

· EDUCATION

· Environment

· NUTRITION AND FOOD SECURITY

TOTAL 29,498,910 10,928,750 11,226,642 97.3%

i Orçamento do Estado de Moçambique cresce em 2015 para 6315 milhões de dólares, 2016, http://www.macauhub.com.mo/pt/category/noticias/, 22/03/16, 12:15:00