Ontario’s Green Energy and Economy Act Power and prosperity to the people

Kristopher Stevens  Executive Director October 15, 2012

Close to $30 billion invested

Canadian Wind Energy Association, 2009 - http://www.canwea.ca

Wind in 2009

Canadian Wind Energy Association, 2012 - http://www.canwea.ca

Wind in 2012

Ontario’s Long-Term

Energy Plan

18 19

Build

ing

Our

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ture

FIGURE 5: BUILDING A CLEANER ELECTRICITY SYSTEM

Coal Free

The Ontario government is committed to improving the health of Ontarians and fighting climate change. Coal-fired plants have been the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the province and among the largest emitters of smog-causing pollutants. Ontario’s reliance on coal-fired generation shot up 127 per cent from 1995-2003, significantly polluting the province’s air. During that period Ontario also relied on importing coal-fired power from the United States. An Ontario study found the health and environmental costs of coal at $3 billion annually (“Cost Benefit Analysis: Replacing Ontario’s Coal-Fired Electricity Generation,” April 2005).

Since 2003, the government has reduced the use of dirty coal-!red plants by 70 per cent. Eliminating coal-fired electricity generation will account for the majority of Ontario’s greenhouse gas reduction target by 2014 — the equivalent of taking 7 million cars o" the road.

FIGURE 4: CONTRAST BETWEEN GENERATION AND INSTALLED CAPACITY

Selecting a supply mix and investment in supply is a matter of choices and trade-offs. A variety of power supply sources — some designed for baseload requirements, some designed for meeting peak requirements — is superior to relying heavily on only one source. For this long-term plan the government has considered environmental, economic, health, social and cost implications to come up with the best possible supply mix.

This improved supply mix will be cleaner, sustainable, modern and reliable. It phases out coal-!red generation at a faster pace, it modernizes Ontario’s nuclear #eet, it includes more renewables, it maximizes hydroelectric power over the near term, and it advances Ontario’s conservation goals.

By 2030, Ontario will have completely eliminated coal as a generation source and will have also increased wind, solar and bioenergy from less than one per cent of generation capacity in 2003 to almost 13 per cent. To ensure reliability, the strategic use of natural gas will be required to complement renewable generation. Nuclear will continue to supply about 50 per cent of Ontario’s electricity needs.

The following chapter will include a review of the various components of Ontario’s electricity supply:

Ontario’s evolving electricity pie

Ontario Ministry of Energy, 2011 – http://www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/

A change in scale and distribution

Preben Maegaard, 2010 – Nordik Folecenter, Denmark

What’s possible?

Paul Gipe, 2012 – http://www.wind-works.org

Smart Power Grid

“Right to Connect”

Streamlined Approvals

Feed-in-tariff program

Promoting Conservation Domestic

Content

The Green Energy and Economy Act & the Feed-in tariff programs

http://www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/energy/gea/ http://www.greenenergyact.ca/ http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/

8

FITs are fair, fixed and long term

Photo by K Stevens, 2009 – Exhibition Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Comparing Ontario’s options

Clean Air Alliance, 2011 – http://www.cleanairalliance.org/files/costcompare.pdf

FIT program progress

Ontario Power Authority, June 25, 2012 – http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/

Community FIT projects

Ontario Power Authority, June 25, 2012 – http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/

Aboriginal FIT projects

Ontario Power Authority, June 25, 2012 – http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/

Ontario’s Long-Term

Energy Plan

18 19

Build

ing

Our

Cle

an E

nerg

y Fu

ture

FIGURE 5: BUILDING A CLEANER ELECTRICITY SYSTEM

Coal Free

The Ontario government is committed to improving the health of Ontarians and fighting climate change. Coal-fired plants have been the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the province and among the largest emitters of smog-causing pollutants. Ontario’s reliance on coal-fired generation shot up 127 per cent from 1995-2003, significantly polluting the province’s air. During that period Ontario also relied on importing coal-fired power from the United States. An Ontario study found the health and environmental costs of coal at $3 billion annually (“Cost Benefit Analysis: Replacing Ontario’s Coal-Fired Electricity Generation,” April 2005).

Since 2003, the government has reduced the use of dirty coal-!red plants by 70 per cent. Eliminating coal-fired electricity generation will account for the majority of Ontario’s greenhouse gas reduction target by 2014 — the equivalent of taking 7 million cars o" the road.

FIGURE 4: CONTRAST BETWEEN GENERATION AND INSTALLED CAPACITY

Selecting a supply mix and investment in supply is a matter of choices and trade-offs. A variety of power supply sources — some designed for baseload requirements, some designed for meeting peak requirements — is superior to relying heavily on only one source. For this long-term plan the government has considered environmental, economic, health, social and cost implications to come up with the best possible supply mix.

This improved supply mix will be cleaner, sustainable, modern and reliable. It phases out coal-!red generation at a faster pace, it modernizes Ontario’s nuclear #eet, it includes more renewables, it maximizes hydroelectric power over the near term, and it advances Ontario’s conservation goals.

By 2030, Ontario will have completely eliminated coal as a generation source and will have also increased wind, solar and bioenergy from less than one per cent of generation capacity in 2003 to almost 13 per cent. To ensure reliability, the strategic use of natural gas will be required to complement renewable generation. Nuclear will continue to supply about 50 per cent of Ontario’s electricity needs.

The following chapter will include a review of the various components of Ontario’s electricity supply:

Threats and opportunities

Ontario Ministry of Energy, 2011 – http://www.mei.gov.on.ca/en/

Year Capacity to replace

TWh to replace

2015 881 MW 6.42 TWh 2017 881 MW 6.42 TWh 2019 881 MW 6.42 TWh 2020 881 MW 6.42 TWh

Wind - $738,300,000 Nuke cheap - $12,198,000,000 + liability

Nuke expensive - $23,754,000,000 + liability

Creating good jobs

Resilient communities and healthier environments

Kristopher Stevens, 2012, M’Chigeeng First Nation, Ontario

Help us build a Roadmap to 2020

Ontario Sustainable Energy Association – http://www.ontario-sea.org

Join the rest of the sector in 2013!

http://go.ontario-sea.org/ALL-ENERGYCANADA

Kristopher Stevens Executive Director

info@ontario-sea.org

416-977-4441 www.ontario-sea.org

Kristopher Stevens, 2012 – M’Chigeeng First Nation, Ontario, Canada

Equity

Barriers

Policy and regulatory

Knowledge

Project financing

Entrenched interests

Our culture

Start small and build on your success

http://tinyurl.com/d52cnkl

Ensure everyone will benefit Investment + pooling/collaborative land leases